Balance Carryforward - Non-Leading Ledger

Hello SAP'ers,
We have 2 ledgers, 1 leading of course with a Fiscal Year of June to May, and one non-leading ledger with a fiscal year of April to March. I can't find any documentation on when to run the balance carryforward program for the non-leading ledger. We have started FY2009 for our non-leading on April 1/ Do I run FAGLGVTR - Balance Carryforward (New), for the non-leading ledger only? I know in June I will run it for the leading. SAPs info is fuzzy regarding the non-leading carryforward process.
Thanks for your help.
JIm

Hello,
I am not sure if I understand quesition correct.
1. Internal order per ledger - this link might give you some information.
FB50L FI-posting to an internal order
You can report internal orders per cost element (acutal and plan)
Use reports in: SAP Menue/ Information Systems/Accounting/Controlling/Reports for Internal Orders/Summarization Reports or/and More Reports
as an instance: S_ALR_87013010
direct output to Excel and drill down functionality for details.
2. GL balances per ledger: use F.08 and select ledger, then you have report per ledger
Let me know if this is what you have expected.
all the best Erwin

Similar Messages

GL account balance for Non Leading Ledger

Hi,
I am trying to get GL account balance for Non leading ledger.
I am able to get Balance sheet GL account balance for leading ledger using 'BAPI_GL_GETGLACCPERIODBALANCES', but I am unable to do so.
For P&L GLs, requirement is to get internal order wise account balance. I am able to get GL balance for leading ledger using documents in BSEG.
Any idea on how we get GL balance for non leading ledger?
Thanks in Advance.
Tejas

Hello,
I am not sure if I understand quesition correct.
1. Internal order per ledger - this link might give you some information.
FB50L FI-posting to an internal order
You can report internal orders per cost element (acutal and plan)
Use reports in: SAP Menue/ Information Systems/Accounting/Controlling/Reports for Internal Orders/Summarization Reports or/and More Reports
as an instance: S_ALR_87013010
direct output to Excel and drill down functionality for details.
2. GL balances per ledger: use F.08 and select ledger, then you have report per ledger
Let me know if this is what you have expected.
all the best Erwin

Asset Balances for Non-Leading Ledger Period - AR01

Dear Members,
A Company Code follows K4 (Jan to Dec)
for IT purpose Non-Leading Ledger was used with FYV - V3 (April to March)
Trail Balance (F.08) is having option of selecting required ledger. Based on the Ledger Selected we can have GL Balances of Jan to Dec or April to March
Same way is there any report is there for asset balances like AR01, so that we can get balances of either Jan to Dec or April to March?
Also let me know there are any other reports like Depreciation / Additions or deletions during the non-leading ledger period for Assets
AR01 is giving balances of Jan to Dec (K4) only
Thanks .... Ramesh

Hi Ramesh
Asset Accounting is linked to Leading Ledger only.. Hence, all asset reports you will get only for Jan-Dec
GL balances report can be fetched for Apr-Mar, but not Asset related reports
You can think of developing custom reports using ABAP, but i am sure there would be limitations
Br. Ajay M

Tax depreciation area and non-leading ledger

I want to know how to post assets retirement and transfer transaction into non-leading ledger.
I setup one depreciation area 50 for local tax depreciation and accordingly one non-leading ledger ZZ for local satuary report.
Depreciation area posting indictor
01: Book depreciation             1
50: Tax depreciation               3 (only post depreciation)
90: Variance (50 minue 01)      6
system was able to peform below:
1) for acquisition transaction, same APC value was updated into both ledger
2) for depreciation, different depreciation amount can post into each ledger
But I don't understand below results:
1) For retirnment transaction, there is only one FI document posted into leading ledger with APC and accumulated depreciation. But I could not find any related document in non-leading ledger.
2) Same as assetes transfer transaction
3) But in assets explorer, the APC, accumulated depreciation was cleared correctly, also there is difference of accumulated depreciation in area 90(derived area)
I think it was different with my expectation: I thought SAP can post FI document to each ledger with APC and different accumulated depreciation.
My question was how to get the APC and accumulated account balance in non-leading ledger with local tax depreciation based.
Thanks in advance!

Thanks first.
ASKB was "Periodic Assets posting" but in our IMG the G/L posting indictor of prallel depreciation area was 3 (only post depreciation) and 6(only APC directly).
The setting was configured through the SAP wizard "Setup Areas for Paralle valuation".
Can you give further advice?

GRR1-Report painter balance sheet for non leading ledger

Hi Experts,
I want to create a balance sheet for non leading ledger group using GRR1 report painter functionality. i have created also however in general selection i have selected non leading ledger under ledger characteristics. and when i am trying to execute report no data is coming in report. however when i assigned leading ledger report is coming correctly. so my question is how to assign a non leading ledger group in report created using GRR1 ?.
Thanks in advance for your comments!!

Dear Mustafa,
Please go to transaction code se16n, enter table FAGLFLEXT. Give the parameters which you have given in the report painter and try to execute, see whether you get any result. If you find any result, please let us know your general data characteristics and what filter you have put at the column level.
Best Regards,
Raj

Opening balance upload in Leading and NOn leading ledger.

Hi All.
We are in the phase of opening balance upload. We are using Leading and Non leading ledger concept. Our Leading ledger starts on 29th of March 2009 as per UK reporting and Non leading ledger starts from 1st April to 31st of March as per India reporting.
We were going to upload the opening balance as on 22nd of Nov as per UK reporting. But here We stuck because as per India reporting our 2008 fiscal year has been closed on 31st of march 2009 also financial books has been closed. But due to UK reporting we are carrying 29th to 3st march 2009 P&L balances in Leading ledger which has been considered in the India Balance sheet ( has come in Profit and Loss Account).
Here I am not able to understand that how I should upload the 29th to 31st march P&L balances in leading ledger because if I will upload these through F-02 or FB50 BDC than these will effect the India balances also. If I am using the FB01l or FB50L to upload the Non leading ledger balances, than system is not allowed me to upload the balances in open item management accounts. System prompt me following message.
Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted
Message no. FAGL_POST_SERVICE012
Diagnosis
You use G/L account 213702 in company code 7041 with open item management. However, postings are not permitted to G/L accounts in individual ledgers with open item management.
Procedure
If you have not yet made any postings to this account and if the account is to be used for closing processes in non-leading ledgers, deactivate the Open Item Management indicator in the company code data for the G/L account.
Can any one tell me that how I can Achieve the same with correct P&L affect in Leading Ledger and correct effect in Non leading ledger Profit and loss account.
Appreciate your immediate response.
Many thanks

Hi
If your problem is solved, can you please let me know the solution for upload of customer, vendor and other open GL items in Non Leading Ledger.
Regards
Sourabh

Leading and non leading ledger balances do not match in FAGLB03

Hi,
Balance for period 5 as per FAGLB03 for leading ledger (0L) is say $104.
The same balance as per nonleading ledger is $176.
I checked in FAGLF03 and no difference exists there.
The issue is only with period 5, the other periods display the balance right.
There is some balance from period 6 that adds up in the credit line items balance and thats the reason for difference.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Soujanya.

Hi all,
Any ideas please??
In other words from my previous posts:
1. Earlier this year (around February) the non leading ledger's (Fiscal Year Variant - K4) was changed in accordance to leading ledger's FYV - YY which is April to March (year dependent).
2. So, the periods in FAGLB03 are divided based on calender months for non leading ledger (X1).
3. As the periods in leading ledger(0L) are year dependent the open and close dates are different than the calender months.
4. That's how calender month(or old K4's fiscal period of X1) August, has 2 0L's fiscal periods i.e. 5 and 6 (5th period closing date was 27.08.2011) and the 6th period start date is 28.08.2011
5. For X1 - non leading ledger when I drill down on the balance of 8th calender month i.e. August , it shows some balance from period 6, where it should not. It should only give us the results of period 5.
6. The results were right for periods 2, 3 and 4 in accordance to 0L's year dependent results. Wondering what went wrong in period 5.
As this is a month end closing issue, would appreciate any clues fast.
Regards,
Soujanya.

Profti Center Determination for Non Leading Ledger

Hi,
We are on ECC6, EHP4. We have activated non leadgin ledger and I am facing issue in asset accounting transaction type for Write up, I have created for Non leading ledger (IFRS) . Following is the issue.
I have created the transaction type "Z71" and attached it to the "IFRS " depreication area. Whenever I post the write up entry and process it from "ASKB" with transaction type "Z71"I get the error "Balancing Field Profit Center in line item 001 not filled." Whenever I use transaction type which posts to both the ledger, entry gets posted correctly without any error.
What could be the issue, am I missing sometihing in configuration?
Please advise
Regards
Shailesh

Dear shilesh,
were you maintain profit center in Define document splitting characteristics for general leadger account
Pls reply me
Thanks & Regards
shankar

Report Painter for Non Leading Ledger (Error GH113)

Hi,
Kindly note that we are in the process of enhancing a report for Monthly Balance Sheet as per our client's requirement. The report is based on report painter and we want to add Ledger as an input selection so that the report can be run for Leading Ledger(0L) and for Non Leading ledger(CL)as well .Initially there was no ledger selection and the report ran only for Leading ledger (0L). However when we try to run it for non leading ledger CL it throws an error message GH113 (more than one ledger not allowed in drill down report.)
Our ABAP Consultants have investigated this issue and suggested that for field (RLDNR) ledger the program is picking up "CL" as per input selection , However 0L is also getting captured thereby resulting in conflict and consequently throwing error GH113.
Concern
1) Does this report has a constraint that it can be run only for leading ledger and not for non leading ledger?
2) Apart from report painter form are there any other default setting which extracts "0L" and puts in the report.
Also note that the report painter form settings have been checked thoroughly and ledger has been defined as local variable for input selection.
Thanks

Hi,
Thanks for your quick response. I have already added the ledger as part of report selection and declared it as a local variable so that input selection is possible. but When I select the non leading ledger "CL" and try to execute report it throws error message GH113.
have checked all the settings in report painter form and not too sure as to from where the report is picking up Leading ledger "0L" although as a part of input selection i have selected non leading ledger "CL"
Appreciate your response.
Thanks

Document splitting with non leading ledger activation

Hi experts,
Thanks for your advance help. we have activated document splitting in my company code pofit center is deriving proprly. for below entry.
1 31       503402     Vinayaka International Ltd.     4100     3,000.00-     0.00
2 40       53080043     ELECT.CHRGS-NON PLT     4100     2,000.00     0.00 4206
3 40       53080043     ELECT.CHRGS-NON PLT     4100     1,000.00     0.00 4207
system is deriving profit center like below.
000001 31 16011002     SUNDRY CREDITORS     2,000.00-     INR   4207
000002 40   53080019     BAD DEBTS WRITTEN OF     1,000.00     INR   4207
000003 40   53080043     ELECT.CHRGS-NON PLT     1,000.00     INR   4206
000004 50   19910001     INTER BRCH/DIVN A/C     1,000.00-     INR   4206
000005 40   19910001     INTER BRCH/DIVN A/C     1,000.00     INR   4207
in the same way i have activated document splitting in another company code with non leading ledger activation. and posting same transation
1 31       503402     Vinayaka International Ltd.     4100     3,000.00-     0.00
2 40       53080043     ELECT.CHRGS-NON PLT     4100     2,000.00     0.00 4206
3 40       53080043     ELECT.CHRGS-NON PLT     4100     1,000.00     0.00 4207
system is not deriving pofit center and it is giving the below error.
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
please advise any configration i have missed out.
any quaries please please let me know.
Regards

Hi Venkat,
Even in the first transaction, the profit center has not been determined by document splitting
if the profit center was derived by document splitting we would have seen 2 items for sundry creditors in the GL view
So check your document splitting settings for the corresponding document type, and transaction variant
the account category which includes vendor's recon accounts should be included in "item categories to be edited" list
Regards
Sach!n

Whether Non leading ledger will have copy of Leading ledger transactions?

Hi,
I have basic understanding about leading and non leading ledgers. My question to the forum is whether non leading ledger will have copy of leading ledger transactions meaning whether entries posted from other modules like SD,MM,PP will be available in both leading and non leading ledger or how it will be saved in system. Then if I post any entries only in non leading ledger, for particular set of GL's and If I want to view the GL balances line item wise (with entry posted in non leading ledger) how can i view it.
Regards
Karthikeyan G

Hi karthik,
The postings in different ledgers happen through Ledger groups.
Say you have one Leading ledger - 0L and two non leading Ledgers N1 & N2
In Configuration you define ledger groups
You can have a single 0L Ledger in a ledger group or you can have all the three ledgers in a ledger group
At the time of transaction posting in FI, you have the option to enter ledger group also. If you dont enter any ledger group, then entries will flow in all the ledgers, and if you enter a ledger group where only 0L is included, then it will flow only in 0L and when you use a ledger group where one leading and one non leading ledger is included, it would flow to only two ledgers.
For entries from MM, SD or other modules, you dont have the option of entering ledger groups, so entries will reflect in all ledgers.
Regards,
kavita

Post open item management account into non-leading ledger independently

I want to use FB50L to post an open item management account balance value into non-leading ledger, the system throws out an error.
I know it can not delete the sign ---open item.
Could anyone give some advice?
Thank you!

Hi,
Open item management account as an adjustment account.
By your description the adjustment account for GL account is the same
at Trx OBA1, so this is the reason for error message
FAGL_FC_VAL does not allow Open item management account as an adjustment account
in standard because normally there are more than one ledger set up,
and Open item management account must be valid for all ledgers (as the clearing can't be
carried out by ledger). If FAGL_FC_VAL allows this and made the posting
on one specific non-ledger, this basic rule can't be fulfilled.
It's same as trx. FB50L that doesn't allow Open item management account to be
entered in case of ledger-specific posting.
FAGL_POST_SERVICE012. This is justified because open items must be
made valid for all ledgers in the client, and even if there's only one
ledger (0L) in your case that this is also considered as 'ledger-
specific' posting.
Please also check the SAP note:
1239651 FAGL_FC_VALUATION: Posting with a ledger
However you can apply SAP note 884639 to remove the ledger group from
FAGL_FC_VAL posting, and this way the Open item management account can be
used as an adjustment account. However please note that SAP note 884639
is MODIFICATION and the coding could be overwritten by applying the
support package or with upgrade.
Thanks,
Raviteja

Double Posting using Leading and Non-leading ledger...

Gurus'
I am at a client that is using the leading (0L) and non leading (PL) ledger set up. Also, we have configure an additional document document (ZF) for posting to the (PL) ledger. The following configuration settings have been made:
1     US GAAP (group accounting) (PLN)                    1     0L
2     Depreciation on tax limited value (cars)                    0
3     PAS (Polish Accounting Standards) (PLN)                    2     PL
10     CIT TAX (Polish taxation accounting) (PLN)                    3     PL
30     Consolidated balance sheet in local currency PLN       0
31     Consolidated balance sheet in group currency USD     0
32     Book depreciation in group currency (USD)                    0
Can someone explain why I am seeing a duplicate posting on the non leading ledger. Using the settlement transaction from Project Systems or ABZON from the Asset Module I get the expected (AA) document type posting on the leading ledger but also on the non-leading ledger. When I run ASKB, the document ZF is also posted on the non-leading ledger.
Can someone help me figure this out? Thanks,

Hi,
You can check BKPF (document header) and there is a field "ledger group" for which the document was posted onto. If there's no value in the field, it means the document was posted to all ledgers (leading and non leading).
Kyoko

Choosing the leading ledger-non-leading ledger

Hi,
I am in a regional project in southamerica. We are goning to use New GL. We are going to have different companies for each country. The chart of account is going to be one which is usefull for all country (it has different group account for each country), we are also going to have a group chart of account for statement balance sheet. We have to report abroad by USGAAP, but locally by other rules. In the distant future we think to use consolidation.
We are going to define the leading ledger and the non leading ledger, but we have the following problems:
-Which one should be the leading ledger (USGAAP or local rules), because I need many reports for two rules.
-What should I consider for this decision?
-In case I choose the USGAAP as leading ledger, what functionality I am going to loose for local report, (inflation, some report, asset accounting (I need more than one depreciation area for local rules and in some countries the functionality of inflation, etc).
Thanks,
Cecilia

Hi,
I suggest to have leading ledger following group GAAP (inyour case US-GAAP, often IFRS). The number of reports does not affect this decision from my point of view as its the same, no matter which ledger is the leading one...
I am not familiar with inflation accounting but using asset accounting with derived depreciation area(s) which post the difference of (real-time) US-GAAP area (posted to all ledgers) and your local depr. area (to the ledger group needed) should work fine.
Set the derived depr. as a "real area" as a derived area does not provide the full (balance sheet) account determination functionality...
best regards, Christian

Choosing the leading ledger- non leading ledger New GL

Hi,
I am in a regional project in southamerica. We are goning to use New GL. We are going to have different companies for each country. The chart of account is going to be one which is usefull for all country (it has different group account for each country), we are also going to have a group chart of account for statement balance sheet. We have to report abroad by USGAAP, but locally by other rules. In the distant future we think to use consolidation.
We are going to define the leading ledger and the non leading ledger, but we have the following problems:
-Which one should be the leading ledger (USGAAP or local rules), because I need many reports for two rules.
-What should I consider for this decision?
-In case I choose the USGAAP as leading ledger, what functionality I am going to loose for local report, (inflation, some report, asset accounting (I need more than one depreciation area for local rules and in some countries the functionality of inflation, etc).
Thanks,
Cecilia
Edited by: Cecilia Penelas on Dec 6, 2010 6:18 PM

Hi,
I suggest to have leading ledger following group GAAP (inyour case US-GAAP, often IFRS). The number of reports does not affect this decision from my point of view as its the same, no matter which ledger is the leading one...
I am not familiar with inflation accounting but using asset accounting with derived depreciation area(s) which post the difference of (real-time) US-GAAP area (posted to all ledgers) and your local depr. area (to the ledger group needed) should work fine.
Set the derived depr. as a "real area" as a derived area does not provide the full (balance sheet) account determination functionality...
best regards, Christian

Balance Carryforward - Non-Leading Ledger

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for