Best internal SATA RAID option

I'd like to add more drives internally and create a RAID 0 for video production (DV work right now, but DVCProHD in the near future).
I've found different options for mounts and controller cards from Sonnet, Wiebtech, RocketRAID, Digital Virgin, MaxConnect and Granite Digital.
Can anyone recommend or give their own pros and cons for these different systems?
Thanks,
dgh

The drives look very cute on those wooden popsicle sticks. I don't know if saving on the mounts is helpful to the overall picture considering the cost of the drives and controller card.
Here's all the information I've been able to dig up and I thought I'd share it. To me the MaxConnect 4port CPU bay system ($220US) using 3 MaxLine III 300GB drives ($360US) looks like the most bang for your buck. It gives you a 900GB RAID for $580.
PCI-E host controllers:
RocketRAID 2320 (can't boot from it) $290 for 8 internal channels/SATA II
RocketRAID 2310 (can't boot from it) $150 for 4 internal channels/SATA I & II
http://www.highpoint-tech.com/
Tempo SATA E4i (can't boot from it) $200 for 4 internal channels/SATA II
http://www.sonnettech.com/product/temposatae4i.html
SATAVue™ SATA Hot-Swap PCI Host Adapters $50 for 2 internal channels/SATA II
http://www.granitedigital.com/catalog/pg49_fasthostadapters.htm
MaxExpress 2 port SATA Controller w/CPU Bay mounts & cables $140
MaxExpress 4 port SATA Controller w/CPU Bay mounts & cables $270
http://www.maxupgrades.com/istore/index.cfm?fuseaction=product.display&Product_I D=141
G5 PowerMac mounting kits:
G5 Dual Drive Mounting Kit (ugly, screws mount to front) $50 to mount 2 drives in CPU bay
http://www.granitedigital.com/catalog/pg63_g5dualmounkit.htm
TeraScoop (complete systems - looks cool!) $4K for 2TB/200MBS, $6.5K for 4TB/540MBS, $6.6K for 1.2TB/800MBS!
http://www.digitalvirgin.net/
G5Jam Express (seems like a bad orientation for airflow) $70 to mount 2 drives in CPU bay (no cables)
http://www.wiebetech.com/products/G5JamExpress.php
G5 Jam Plus (replaces door - kind of ugly you can see screws, also seems like a bad orientation for airflow) $400 for 4 internal & 4 external (no cables)
http://www.wiebetech.com/products/G5Jamplus.php
G5 Jam (replaces door - kind of ugly you can see screws, seems like a bad orientation for airflow) $400 for 2 drives in CPU bay (no cables)
http://www.wiebetech.com/products/G5Jam.php
SwiftData200 and SwiftData200R $80 for 3 drives in CPU bay (with cables)
http://www.transintl.com/store/category.cfm?Category=2490
MaxConnect PCI $120 for 2 drives in PCI bay (no cables)
http://www.maxupgrades.com/istore/index.cfm?fuseaction=product.display&Product_I D=140
MaxConnect Optical $220 for 4 drives in Optical bay (no cables)
http://www.maxupgrades.com/istore/index.cfm?fuseaction=product.display&Product_I D=141
MaxConnect CPU $75 for 3 drives in CPU bay (no cables)
http://www.maxupgrades.com/istore/index.cfm?fuseaction=category.display&category _id=307
G5 Jive $100 for 3 drives in CPU bay (no cables)
http://www.sonnettech.com/product/g5_jive.html
Cables:
Tempo SATA cable kit $25 each
http://www.sonnettech.com/product/tsata_cablekit.html
Wiebtech cables $10 each
MaxConnect cables $10 each
Fastest Drives (according to Barefeats):
1.MaXLine Pro 500 16MB $255
2.MaxLine III 300 16MB $120
3.Hitachi Deskstar 7K500 16MB $220
http://www.barefeats.com/quad08.html

Similar Messages

  • Best internal SATA expansion card?

    Two quick questions:
    1. What is a good (and simple) PCI(e) expansion card to add 4 internal SATA connectors to the mother board? I had been using an Adaptec 1405 SAS-SATA card that doesn't want to work after my recent clean installation. During boot up, the Adaptec BIOS discovers the connected devices (that had been formatted and used with the same card till last Thursday, before the recent OS reinstallation) but the computer can't see them. BTW, I do not have a driver, but according to Adaptec, I do not need it if I do not want to connect boot disks to this card (that I never wanted to do anyway). Any advice?
    2.(Not) completely unrelated: Windows 7 64-bit Pro fails restore operations (Error message: 0x80070005 - that's one reason why I had to do a complete reinstallation). My suspicion is BitDefender AV Pro 2011. There are several comments about this problem on the Internet, and not only with BD AV 2011 but with other AV software, also. Windows error message after the failed restore operation also mentions anti virus programs (even if they are disabled during the operation) as possible culprits. Any insight/advice?
    Thanks for any comment, Laci.

    Hi Bill (and others who could help...),
    By the suggestions of this thread, I installed the Areca ARC-1300-4i storage controller a few weeks ago. Easily installed the driver, and everything showed up in the Device Manager, the Disk Management and in (My) Computer. (2x 2 TB HDDs and 2x LG optical drives are connected to it.) No problem with the HDDs, and no problem with reading from the optical drives (or playing movies, etc.).
    However, I run into a big problem when I wanted to write (burn) on the optical drives! I was trying out some burner software but nothing seemed to work: Windows Explorer froze and I had to hard reboot the system a few times. I have used "Nero micro" before without any problem to read and write with the Adaptec expansion card (which went bad and I replaced with this Areca card).
    I removed all the third party burner software (Revo is an excellent tool!), and tried Windows 7's native burning application: it also messed up Windows Explorer (hard reboot again...).  When I connected one of the LG optical drives directly to the mother board's SATA 3.0 Gb/s port (see attachment): voil'a, everything works just fine.
    I am contacting the Areca technical support tomorrow, and will report their input. Still, since it might be some deeper problem with the whole system, I would greatly appreciate if anybody would give me any idea what to try - short of reinstalling the operating system (again...) - which might be necessary after the many restore/restart operations during the Adaptec card replacement with the Areca card a few weeks ago.
    Thank you,
    Laci
    P.S.
    Adaptec is exchanging the bad Adaptec card with a brand new card (Adaptec 1405 SAS/SATA Controller), may be I will use that card after all...
    The attached Intel Matrix Storage Consol shows the situation when one of the optical drive is directly connected to port 5 on the mother board.

  • Internal SATA RAID Mirror or Simple Back-Up Util

    I have two 500gb SATA drives. One has the system, applications and data on it. The second drive is a new install and clean.
    What would be the best strategy for back-up of entire drive? Use Back-up .Mac application to copy to the second drive or use a Raid Mirror on the seond drive?

    Hi Jazzman,
    Keep in mind that RAID level 1 is not a backup at all, its only for protecting the integrity of your data. In the case were you will delete a file or overwrite one, only a true backup will help.
    RAID will only recover when the other disk will fail.
    Ziv

  • Best Throughput for RAID - Internal SATA vs. PCI RAID Card

    Hi, we're upgrading our old server, which has been on an upgraded G4. We put 3 SATA drives in it, connected to a Highpoint 1820a RAID card running RAID 5.
    We're moving this to an older G5 1.6 GHz model (2003). It currently has 2 internal SATA drive bays, but I know can be expanded with an adapter kit. It also has just plain PCI slots (not PCI-X or PCIe).
    So I'm wondering what would provide better performance (throughput I guess):
    • Using the 2 internal bays with a software RAID 1?
    • Putting our old Highpoint RAID card in the PCI slot and running RAID 1 or possibly RAID 5 (with another drive)?
    I know the RAID card doesn't use the processor for RAID functions, but I think in a RAID 1 it's fairly minimal, correct? I'm mostly wondering if the older basic PCI slot would bet the bottleneck in a fast system compared to the onboard SATA controllers?
    THANKS!

    Well, we're most concerned with data security and reliability. We're not streaming video or anything else that would demand extreme throughput. The server is mostly serving files to 4-5 users. So I imagine the performance gains would only be noticed when opening/closing files off the server, correct?
    And we already own the Highpoint card, which has 8 internal SATA ports, so we'll probably use this. It works fine on PCI bus. So we can run this with 4 drives in either two RAID 1s (boot & files); a RAID 5, or a RAID 10.
    We'll probably stick with Western Digital or Seagate 'enterprise' SATA drives, such as the WD RE3.
    So, do you think we would see much real-world difference between the different RAID options (RAID 1 software, RAID 1 hardware, RAID 5 hardware, RAID 10 hardware)?
    Thanks!

  • 3rd Party SATA raid cards for internal drives?

    All --
    Apart from the discussion as to if RAID actually benefits a home desktop system, I am wondering if anyone has the lowdown on using 3rd party SATA raid cards to support the INTERNAL hard drives on the Mac Pro series?
    My Mac Pro is still slated to be built at Apple and for now I have the minimum memory and HD spec being requested at Apple, with the plan to upgrade the memory and drives from OWC or another vendor.
    I've toyed with the idea of utilizing Disk Utility's software RAID features (e.g. RAID 0 for scratch disks, RAID 1 for boot, RAID 0+1 for all else.) I've also toyed with the notion of searching for a hardware raid solution which would allow me to transfer the internal SATA cable runs from the motherboard to a host adapter card for an internal multi-channel experience (with options to create and break mirrors to external devices for backup purposes.)
    So....
    Has anyone experience or utilized 3rd party hardware raid controllers which can connect to the internal HD bays? Are there limitations to this (ie, does the boot drive HAVE to reside off the internal motherboard controllers, or can an internal hardware controller successfully boot the system) of which ought be noted?
    Finally, in the event that a host adapter card cannot drive the interna bays, can anyone give feedback to hardware SATA cards to power external drive bays with support for Disk Utility (to allow RAID1 pairings of internal drives to external snapshot-backup drives)?
    Thanks for your time,
    Ian Poulin
    Richmond, Va

    I am wondering if anyone has the lowdown on using 3rd party SATA raid cards to support the INTERNAL hard drives on the Mac Pro series?
    There are many 3rd party controllers that support the internal HDs if an internal iPass connector is used. The problem is that some are bootable but most are not.
    The Areca ARC-1680ix-12 and the HighPoint RocketRAID 4320 are bootable. However, the system cannot be installed via the Apple DVD. Instead the user needs to clone a boot drive with the proper drivers to the boot volume on the controller and then boot from the 3rd party controller.
    The other issue I found is that these controllers do not support Boot Camp. If Boot Camp is desired, my recommendation would be to leave the internal HDs on the Mac Pro internal bus intact and use the 3rd party controller for external storage. This method provides four internal bays that are bootable, support Boot Camp and can be used for system backups. I use the 3rd party controller for external storage for large RAID sets and hot swapping hard disks.
    With the internal bays intact and external hot swap RAID storage available the user can support Boot Camp, multiple system volumes and large external RAID sets. From my experience using a 3rd party controller with the internal HD bays always has some limitations. The user usually does not realize it unit later when Boot Camp does not work or the computer fails on a system upgrade or the controller does not work at all with a new version of Mac OS X.
    Staying with the standard internal Mac Pro bay configuration will be the best configuration to avoid compatibility issues with future versions of Mac OS X. It is rumored that the new Snow Leopard may require 64-bit drivers. If that is the case, I would expect most if not all existing 3rd party controller drivers to fail. Some drivers will be upgraded after a few months while others may not. Having the internal Mac Pro SATA controller intact should at least allow the Mac Pro to boot if my guess about compatibility issues is correct.
    can anyone give feedback to hardware SATA cards to power external drive bays with support for Disk Utility (to allow RAID1 pairings of internal drives to external snapshot-backup drives)?
    There are a large number of external controllers that work with Disk Utility. Here are some of my favorites.
    1. FirmTek SeriTek/2SE2-E and the SeriTek/5PM
    http://firmtek.stores.yahoo.net/sata5pm2se2.html
    http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/amug/reviews/articles/firmtek/5pm/
    2. Sonnet Tempo E4P
    http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/amug/reviews/articles/sonnet/mac-pro/
    3. DAT Optic eSATA_PCIe8
    http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/amug/reviews/articles/datoptic/pcie8/
    Have fun!

  • What is the best e-Sata PCI RAID card for Mavericks.

    What is the best e-Sata PCI RAID card for Mavericks.  Bought a new MAC PRO with Mavericks and the older PCI 1095,3124 that I used on older MAC Pro does not work.  The MAC sees it, but the drivers never show up as being installed.  If I could find drivers that work or a recommended PCI card it would be appreciated.
    Thanks

    PM made sense - 6 yrs ago when disk drives were much slower. Today it is a bottleneck.
    SAS makes more sense. Outside of SSD, no disk drive maxes out by itself one PM interface (an SSD will) but it also means just two drives are enough to do so. So check out why to avoid PM:
    www.macperformanceguide.com

  • Raid or internal sata card for my mac?

    Hi People,
    I have some problems with my internal sata ports and therefore I'm thinking about buying either a raid card (I want to run my two internal harddrives in raid0 so doing it hardware would not be a bad idea) or just a simple internal sata card. But I can't seam to find any products like that except for the raid card apple wants like 1400$ for which is way overkill for this little hack. This can be done for something like 80$ on PC, isen't it possible to get something for my powermac g5 quad that will work?
    Thank you in advance.

    Hi-
    Replied to your other post. Check out the Firmtek line (PCI Express) at OWC (will ship worldwide):
    http://eshop.macsales.com/Search/Search.cfm?Criteria=SATA%20High%2DSpeed%20Contr oller%20Mac%20Cards&sort=a
    For RAID, this Highpoint would set you up right:
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Highpoint%20Technologies/RRAID2310/

  • 2-Drive Raid 0 on Apple Internal SATA bootable?

    This has sort of been answered in these forums but I want to be sure:
    If I add an extra 160GB drive, identical to the 160 that shipped with my 2004 Dual 2ghz G5, can I Raid-0 them together using Disk Utility and be able to have this raid volume as the startup disk?
    I want the extra read/write speed a raid-o will give me to maybe capture, but definitely playback 1:1 uncompressed Avid video media. I need about 45MB/s sustained. Performance tests I did on the single 160 SATA already installed gives me around 43MB/s sustained.
    2ghz Dual G5   Mac OS X (10.4.3)   2gb ram

    3 more questions:
    1. Is a Raid-O configuration more prone to harddrive
    failure than just a single drive on it's own?
    Yes
    2. Do I have to buy the same model/brand drive as the
    one I already have, or I can I get a different brand
    with the same specs/size?
    You do not have to have the same model or brand. But you should understand that using drives that are not matched pairs will cause the stripe RAID set to perform slower. Typically using different brands will cause the RAID to perform at the slowest rate of performance for each drive. Hooking up a fast drive with a slower drive will usually result in worse performance than if you had two matched slow drives.
    3. The current drive installed is a 160GB Seagate
    Baracuda SATA 1.5Gb/s. The same size/brand, except
    SATA 3.0Gb/s I find more in stock and available
    online. Anyone know if there are issues with Raiding
    the SATA-150 w/SATA-300?
    You can easily RAID SATA I and SATA II drives. I do it all the time. However, in some cases the results will be slower. Usually mixing brands provides worse performance than mixing SATA I and SATA II models of the same brand and size.
    Frankly - I think you would be better off getting a single Maxtor Maxline III 7V300F0 300GB Serial ATA 3Gb 7200RPM Hard Drive for $123.75 here:
    http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=100719-9
    This drive will boot faster than a 160GB mixed RAID and comes with a 5 year warranty. I have used a dual striped RAID set for booting and find it is noisier and does not provide any real performance boost except when copying data. Booting with a RAID is not faster - usually it is a little slower. Launching apps are not faster either. If I want a fast RAID for copying I hook up a 4-6 drive SATA RAID using a FirmTek bootable card like the SeriTek/1eVE4 Host Adapter. You can see more on it here:
    http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/amug/reviews/articles/firmtek/1eve4/
    I find a single fast boot drive performs just as well as a bootable RAID at all things other than copying data. In fact, two drives can actually work faster when not RAIDed. For detailed tests on this issue see:
    http://www.barefeats.com/hard63.html
    RAID PAIR or INDEPENDENT DRIVES?
    "Based on the mixed gains of the RAID pairs over single drives, I hypothesized that there are more avantages to having two independent drives as opposed to a bootable RAID 0 pair. Why? Because things don't happen in sequence. Your normal work flow causes storage events to happen in parallel."
    I agree with barefeats on this. If you copy data to your drive most of the day a RAID is great but otherwise there is very little REAL performance gain unless you like to look at Xbench all day
    Have fun,
    Michael

  • Best RAID option for old video

    I want to create an inexpensive RAID for old video and data. The stuff is very important to me, but I don't need performance, as this is "deep storage." In order to save money, I'm thinking of using 2 500 GB drives and Disk Utility.
    What would be your preferred RAID option and why? Thanks.

    I would say RAID 1 "mirrored".
    Your data would be stored on both disks and if you had a failure with one disk.
    quote from Disk Utility Help:
    +About mirrored RAID sets+
    +To help protect your data against disk failure, you can create a mirrored RAID set, also called RAID 1. In a mirrored RAID set, your data is written to two or more disks at once. If one of the disks fails or is disconnected, your computer can still access the data from the other disks. If you reconnect a disk you disconnected, the RAID set can rebuild it in the background so that it contains the latest data.+
    +You can add spare disks to the set, called hot spares, that aren’t written to unless another disk fails or is disconnected. The RAID set then rebuilds one of the hot spares. If you reconnect a disk after the RAID replaces it with a hot spare, the reconnected disk is treated as a hot spare.+
    +You can choose to have the RAID set rebuild a reconnected spare disk automatically. Otherwise, you must rebuild it yourself.+
    +You still need to back up your data regularly, even though you have a mirrored RAID set. Mirroring protects you from some types of hardware failure, but not from user errors or software corruption. If you delete a file, it’s deleted from the mirror as well. If software corrupts a file, it’s also corrupted on the mirror.+
    Message was edited by: David Altonaga

  • Questions about streaming disk, firewire and SATA raids.

    I have two internal drives, one for applications/system and one for audio, which had been suitable up until recently. I recently added Ivory, and some addons to the BFD drums. The BFD Deluxe has significantlly more velocity layers, and is placing a strain on computer and drives.
    I moved the BFD drum data onto an external firewire 800 (because of data size) The BFD drums seem to be having a hard time keeping up, (it glitches and stutters).
    I have 3 gig of ram, so I guess I'll add more ram. But I'm unsure about SATA raids. Is it better to add an external firewire RAID?... Mac Guru, has some reasonably priced kits. Has anyone had experience with them?
    There is a 3 drive bay which you can put inside your G5, but I have concerns it will draw too much power and generate too much heat.
    Lastly, if I buy a 4 bay external raid, can i create a 3 drive raid, and keep 1 one drive as a seperate drive (do I have to stripe all drives in one enclosure, or can they be seperate?
    Any insights would be helpful.. thanx

    depending on whether you use eSATA or FW, you have differnet options as to how you mount the drives as volume(s) to your computer. FW pretty much limits you to a single logical volume, although it could be RAID-0 or in some rare instances, RAID-5 with certain enclosures.
    eSATA, again, depending on the specific enclosure, can mount all the drives as a single volume, but you may have the option to mount multiple logical volumes... like the 1 RAID-0 and 1 independent volume like you mentioned.
    earlier tonight i recommended this drive to someone else for a laptop application...
    http://www.lacie.com/products/product.htm?pid=10724
    for a desktop application, you would probably go with their 3.5" solutions since buss power is not important to you.
    this might not be accurate, but this is my understanding of highest read/write performance to lowest in terms of general specs (certain products may have advantages / dissadvantages depending on the implementation) all RAID-0 volumes are assumed to be 2 drive RAID, although it is technically possible to do more with certain hardware.
    1) RAID-0 eSATA
    2) RAID-0 FW
    3) RAID-5 eSATA
    4) single eSATA
    5) single FW
    6) RAID-0 USB2
    7) RAID-5 FW
    8) single USB2
    9) RAID-5 USB2
    RAID-5 is a real wild card here because a 3 drive image is really not the intended configuration for RAID-5... more drives is preferred before you start reaching theoretical efficiency and the actual XOR engine or lack of one can drastically affect your performance levels.

  • RAID Options-Which is better?

    I'm about to place a hefty order with OWC for my new Mac Pro before it arrives. I use Aperture and keep the library on a different drive than my boot drive. I would like to set up a RAID 0 for maximum speed. I'm going to order 2 500GB Western Digital RE SATA RAID Edition drives (have had good luck with WD). I know that a software RAID isn't as good as a hardware RAID. Which do you think would be the better choice below. I will be backing up the Media drive regardless.
    1. Add two of the above drives internally and use Disk Utility to create a 1 TB RAID 0
    2. Use this enclosure:
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/MEFW924AL2K/
    which allows spanning w/ two different drives (may come in handy someday), striping as a RAID 0, or spanning in sequence. The other options besides RAID may be just a bonus later. Speed is my concern.
    The enclosure has a jumper that sets the configuration. I realize this isn't as good as a RAID card or an eSATA enclosure, but price is becoming an object. I guess I'm asking if this is hardware RAID on the cheap and better than a software RAID.
    If #2 is faster and/or more reliable, I'd back up to a large internal drive. Thank you for any advice.

    +Pick up the dual SATA $67 black case from OWC and avoid FireWire, and those FW RAID type.+
    Just curious - why avoid FW or just for raid. I have 2 Mercury Elite FW 800 externals that work fine.
    +There are two extra SATA ports on the motherboard that can be used.+
    +NewerTech kit from OWC $25.+
    I did a search on OWC and couldn't find this. Could you link to it?
    +Sonnet Tempo E4P SATA controller 4-channel and up to 20 drives for external RAID. When you find the need.+
    Looks like a great card, but $270 + eSATA enclosure + drives not a current option. As you state, maybe in the future.
    +I would pick up a 750GB WD Caviar SE16 or RE2 for your boot drive or internal Time Machine. Fast and excellent boot drive even if you use half. If price wasn't an issue I'd skip the 500GB for 750GB model but they are $100 extra each.+
    I may go w/ WD 750 for the boot drive, but just to return to the RAID question-I wasn't referrring to either a boot or backup drive. I keep most of my media on a second internal drive. I would like to make it a RAID. Any thoughts on my #1, a software RAID?
    +The Newer kit is difficult to install (needle nose and good eyesight) plus $67 case and another pair of WD RE2s is $330. And faster (almost 150MB/sec) than 80MB/sec of FW interface you get otherwise.+
    I know the case you mean. I'm confused, though. I assumed you used a PCI eSATA card for connection. How could it connect from interior to exterior of Mac Pro case?

  • Best Internal HD for video editing??

    I bought my Mac Pro month ago with only a 250gb HD, i want to buy a new HD to run windows Vista, i have parrallels desktop but it only uses 1gb Ram from my 4gb I have on my system...i use Final Cut Pro as well as Premiere Pro and other Adobe and windows applications that i cant run on a Mac.. so i was thinking of getting a new HD 2 run windows with Bootcamp
    * i dont want to mess with the same HD since windows still have problems with viruses so i want to run both OS in separate HD.
    I want to know what is the best internal HD to run heavy windows applications on my Mac (with Bootcamp) seagate, Maxtor?? plz give me the models and serial#s
    Thanks
    Hansel Jr.
    Mac Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.10)  

    I don't want to mess with the same HD since windows still has problems
    with viruses so I want to run both OS in separate HD.
    There is nothing to stop a Window's virus from formatting a second disk drive, even if it doesn't know how to read or write its file system. It's no harder than wiping out a second partition on the same drive as Windows, so using separate drives is not adding much more protection for OSX against Windows. You just have to trust your virus protection on Windows. Of course, having separate drives does give you the option to unplug the OSX drive before you boot Windows. (Turn off the power first.) It would be nice if SATA drives had a connection for a write disable switch.

  • SATA RAIDS

    Hey all,
    I'm working on my home system, trying to decide what the "RAID for me" is. I'm considering going the internal route, with wiebetech's G5Jam+ and the 8-port SATA card (4 internal, 4 external), using either 400GB Seagate drives or 500GB Hitachis (ideally, the Hitachis). I'd start with 2 drives (limited budge), but it'd be nice to have room to grow, hence the G5jam+.
    Option B I guess would be the Burly 4 drive RAID enclosure over at macgurus, and a similar interface card. This is an external RAID, each drivebay has a separate eSATA port, so it can be setup as JBOD, or as a huge RAID-0. I would also start with just 2 drives on this one, and build over time.
    I've considered getting a G-RAID SATA, 1 TB for like $1200 - a good deal for sure, and a spifferoo enclosure. My concern here is that I'll be needing to edit 1080P HD uncompressed 10-bit at some point, and I'll need the bandwidth to do so. (I'm planning a super16mm shoot, telecine to 23.98 1080P D5, capture to 10-bit uncompressed, do all my FX, editing, preliminary CC, and then final CC at another facility with a real monitor... finally for output to D5 again, for uprez to 2k, and print to 35mm. Ambitious, I know, but production value and realism in this project are going to have to be absolutely stellar, despite having to do things on a smaller budget.)
    The TRT of this project is going to be no more than 22 minutes all told, so I won't need to capture more than 2 hrs. of HD at a time. At this point I'm leaning towards the Burly external RAID, so that I'll have portability, in case I have to capture and export at a different facility without dragging my computer over there. Then again, I could always rent a D5 deck.
    ...thoughts?
    thanks in advance to any advice.
    -Kristoffer

    I'd like to know more about SATA Raids as well. Been researching them, but haven't gotten very far. Bare Feats.com has some info there and I believe you need 225 MB/s sustained.
    I posted this in an earlier thread. Hope it helps somewhat:
    I've read a lot about eSATA or SATA II raids. Much cheaper (than fiberchannel), but the claimed speeds vary so much for what seems to be the same basic product. For example, this product seems to claim up to 150 MB/s per drive:
    http://www.kanotechnologies.com/products/XPD-4XKTSI.cfm
    And this product claims up to 300 MB/s and Uncompressed HD editing:
    http://www.sonnettech.com/publicfiles/pdfs/pdfdatasheets/fusiondatasheet.pdf
    But I've read in other places and been told that SATA drives realistically run closer to 56 MB/s and eSATA drives only 3-20 MB/s faster.
    Sure would be nice to have a cheaper alternative, but sorting through all this and trying to figure out which eSATA card will fit your G5 w/o taking up extra slots or running too slow b/c it's on the same bus as another card, etc etc, is imho a total mess.

  • Best configuration for RAID-setup?

    After reading the post about what FS would be best for 5x500GB, it occurred to me that I have to migrate my RAID-setup soonish and that I would like to hear some more opinions before doing so.
    At the moment, my server is running 64bit Arch for 1.5 years now, and it is composed of new parts (C2D 8400, 4GB RAM and 3x320GB HD) with an 'old' 6-port SATA RAID-controller (HP-rebranded Adaptec 2605-card) that I recuperated from our previous office-server. Since I had never worked with RAID before in my life, I was very happy that installing an FS on it and installing arch on that FS went without a hassle.
    Now I have to grow the capacity, and although I have some spare ports (3 out of 6 are free), I fear that I'll have to rebuild the FS, since I didn't install LVM. Rebuilding the array might include a risk to lose my data, so I'm thinking of just starting over and doing it right this time:
    1. Separate disk for the OS, not in a RAID-array
    2. 3-disk RAID-5 array, with LVM
    3. Partition the LVM in two slices (1 for work and 1 for 'play').
    Are there any considerations I have to think of before doing this? I think Ext4 is the FS-of-choice for a server that will be doing mainly NFS (media), CUPS, and some HTTP/PostgreSQL...

    All sounds good to me... I'm not personally a fan of RAID-5 just due to personal preference, but with 3 disks it's your only option really.

  • PT8 Neo SATA Raid Configuration Utility

    I recently upgraded my system which was running a AMD athlon 1.2GHZ processor and only 128mb SDRAM.  The system was stable and running windows XP home edition.
    I upgraded to the PT8 Neo motherboard which supports SATA hard drives.  I was expecting a dramatic increase when I upgraded my system to the new P4 800mhz FSB 3.0GB processor and 512MB DDR 400mhz ram.
    I was still using my WD 60GB EIDE Hard Drive when I upgraded the Motherboard, Ram, & Processor.  The upgrade went smoothly and system worked without glitches.
    Unsatisfied with the increase in performance, I also purchased a Western Digital Raptor 74GB 10000 RPM hard drive using the SATA interface cable.
    I have updated the bios of the motherboard and updated the driver for the SATA raid controller using Live Bios Update 3.
    I am having 2 problems:
    Problem 1.  When I enter the bios for the SATA Raid configuration utility after the initial post by pressing , none of the selections are available.  I move my arrows down but nothing highlights and I can't select anything in the configuration utility except ESC key to exit.
    The SATA controller is enabled in the BIOS.
    The initial SATA Raid Configuration displayed immediately after the post, does show the hard drive.
    I want to be able to boot from the new WD Raptor Hard Drive and transfer all the existing files from the IDE Drive to the SATA drive, but I can't seem to get the drive to initialize, format, fdisk, etc.
    Problem 2.  Windows XP doesn't have enough resources available to activate the VIA Serial ATA RAID Controller in Device Manager.  It shows a Yellow ! and returns a code 12 (This device cannot find enough free resources that it can use).  I have tried disabling several items in the bios including LAN support, On board Sound but nothing seems to work.
    Keep in mind, I have downloaded the latest bios, latest drivers, etc.
    The rest of the components on my machine are as follows:
    1.  Custom Built Computer (Non-Branded)
    2.  60GB Western Digital 7200 RPM IDE Hard Drive on IDE0 (Master)
    3.  DVD Rom on IDE0 (Slave)
    4.  MSI 52x32x52x CDRW on IDE1 (Master)
    5.  Zip 100 IDE Drive (Slave)
    6.  Floppy Drive
    7.  Pentium 4 3.0GZ 800mhz FSB
    8.  512mb DDR 400mhz Memory
    9.  ATI All-In-Wonder PCI Video Card
    10. SIIG Firewire controller
    I have already tried removing the SIIG firewire controller thinking that it was getting in the way of available resources.  That did not work.
    I have invested alot of money on this system, I wanted the best and have always used MSI motherboards because of their stability and reliability.
    Please help as soon as possible.
    Thanks

    first off you are only using one SATA so no option are avalible in Raid Bios
    in order to install windows the safe way detach your 60ata hrad drive plug in the raptor and install windows then Press F6 at the begining the you will have to the SATA diskett in the floppy drive  in stall SATA windows drivers continue with install.
    once you are fished Windows, drivers then shut down and plug in your ATA hard drive turn on your PC enter the bios navagate to the Advanceed BIOS Features/Boot Sequency selected your SATA raid drive as First boot then CD roms as second. then your done boot in to windows

Maybe you are looking for