Best Practice for new BI project

we are about to start new BI project.
what is the best practice to start new BI project
1. start only with FI as poc
2. more than one module does not matter if the project was planned and scoped well
can you give me link to best practice in starting BI projects?
Regards

Hi,
Please go through following links.
Business Intelligence : Getting Started with Business Intelligence ,Reporting, Analysis, and Planning , Data Warehousing, BI Accelerator Embedded and Process-Centric BI
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/nw-bi
The Home of SAP Business Warehouse (BW)
http://www.erpgenie.com/sap/sapfunc/bw.htm
SAP Business Information Warehouse
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/b2/e50138fede083de10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
Business Intelligence : Programming in BW
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/bi/programminginBW&
BW and Portals 2005
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/bi-and-portals2005
SAP Business Warehouse (BW) Overview
http://gleez.com/sap/bw/overview
Business Intelligence : Steps to get started with SAP BW
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/bi/stepstogetstartedwithSAPBW&
SAP Business Information Warehouse Scenarios
http://help.sap.com/bp_biv335/BI_EN/html/Bw.htm
SAP BW Learning Guide
http://searchsap.techtarget.com/general/0,295582,sid21_gci1077480,00.html
SAP BW Business Warehouse - Introduction
http://www.thespot4sap.com/Articles/SAP_BW_Introduction.asp
Business Content Frontend Design Guidelines (NW04)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/bda556e9-0c01-0010-83b0-d519d6deb9e9
How ToCreate and Maintain UI Patterns of BI Content
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ad214fe9-0c01-0010-4291-a629e5ba5f90
SAP NetWeaver BI Integrated Planning for Finance
http://www.sap-press.de/katalog/buecher/htmlleseproben/gp/htmlprobID-113
Info object,infocube,infosource,datasource,commn structure,extract structure ..etc..
http://www.erpgenie.com/sapgenie/docs/MySAP%20BW%20Cookbook%20Vol%201.pdf
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/01b9395c-0e01-0010-6786-c4ee5e5d2154
BI Performance Tuning
FAQ - The Future of SAP NetWeaver Business Intelligence in the Light of the NetWeaver BI&Business Objects Roadmap
Business Intelligence Journal Improving Query Performance in Data Warehouses
http://www.tdwi.org/Publications/BIJournal/display.aspx?ID=7891
Achieving BI Query Performance Building Business Intelligence
http://www.dmreview.com/issues/20051001/1038109-1.html
SAP Business Intelligence Accelerator : A High - Performance Analytic Engine for SAP Ne tWeaver Business Intelligence
http://www.sap.com/platform/netweaver/pdf/BWP_AR_IDC_BI_Accelerator.pdf
BI Performance Audit
http://www.xtivia.com/downloads/Xtivia_BIT_Performance%20Audit.pdf
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10564d5c-cf00-2a10-7b87-c94e38267742
Enhancements in SAP BW
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/59069d90-0201-0010-fd81-d5e11994d8b5
Customer Enhancements in SAP NetWeaver BI (Exits, BAdIs and ABAP in the SAP NetWeaver BI Back End)
http://www.sap.com/community/pub/showdetail.epx?itemID=5257
BW 3.x and 3.5 "How To" Guides List
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/docs?rid=/webcontent/uuid/ee14e25d-0501-0010-11ad-8eb2861a7ec0 [original link is broken]
Assign ponits if it helps
Thanks & Regards
santo

Similar Messages

Best Practices for new iMac

I posted a few days ago re failing HDD on mid-2007 iMac. Long story short, took it into Apple store, Genius worked on it for 45 mins before decreeing it in need of new HDD. After considering the expenses of adding memory, new drive, hardware and installation costs, I got a brand new iMac entry level (21.5" screen,
2.7 GHz Intel Core i5, 8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3 memory, 1TB HDD running Mavericks). Also got a Superdrive. I am not needing to migrate anything from the old iMac.
I was surprised that a physical disc for the OS was not included. So I am looking for any Best Practices for setting up this iMac, specifically in the area of backup and recovery. Do I need to make a boot DVD? Would that be in addition to making a Time Machine full backup (using external G-drive)? I have searched this community and the Help topics on Apple Support and have not found any "checklist" of recommended actions. I realize the value of everyone's time, so any feedback is very appreciated.

OS X has not been officially issued on physical media since OS X 10.6 (arguably 10.7 was issued on some USB drives, but this was a non-standard approach for purchasing and installing it).
To reinstall the OS, your system comes with a recovery partition that can be booted to by holding the Command-R keys immediately after hearing the boot chimes sound. This partition boots to the OS X tools window, where you can select options to restore from backup or reinstall the OS. If you choose the option to reinstall, then the OS installation files will be downloaded from Apple's servers.
If for some reason your entire hard drive is damaged and even the recovery partition is not accessible, then your system supports the ability to use Internet Recovery, which is the same thing except instead of accessing the recovery boot drive from your hard drive, the system will download it as a disk image (again from Apple's servers) and then boot from that image.
Both of these options will require you have broadband internet access, as you will ultimately need to download several gigabytes of installation data to proceed with the reinstallation.
There are some options available for creating your own boot and installation DVD or external hard drive, but for most intents and purposes this is not necessary.
The only "checklist" option I would recommend for anyone with a new Mac system, is to get a 1TB external drive (or a drive that is at least as big as your internal boot drive) and set it up as a Time Machine backup. This will ensure you have a fully restorable backup of your entire system, which you can access via the recovery partition for restoring if needed, or for migrating data to a fresh OS installation.

Best practices for setting up projects

We recently adopted using Captivate for our WBT modules.
As a former Flash and Director user, I can say it’s
fast and does some great things. Doesn’t play so nice with
others on different occasions, but I’m learning. This forum
has been a great source for search and read on specific topics.
I’m trying to understand best practices for using this
product. We’ve had some problems with file size and
incorporating audio and video into our projects. Fortunately, the
forum has helped a lot with that. What I haven’t found a lot
of information on is good or better ways to set up individual
files, use multiple files and publish projects. We’ve decided
to go the route of putting standalones on our Intranet. My gut says
yuck, but for our situation I have yet to find a better way.
My question for discussion, then is: what are some best
practices for setting up individual files, using multiple files and
publishing projects? Any references or input on this would be
appreciated.

Hi,
Here are some of my suggestions:
1) Set up a style guide for all your standard slides. Eg.
Title slide, Index slide, chapter slide, end slide, screen capture,
non-screen capture, quizzes etc. This makes life a lot easier.
2) Create your own buttons and captions. The standard ones
are pretty ordinary, and it's hard to get a slick looking style
happening with the standard captions. They are pretty easy to
create (search for add print button to learn how to create
buttons). There should instructions on how to customise captions
somewhere on this forum. Customising means that you can also use
words, symbols, colours unique to your organisation.
3) Google elearning providers. Most use captivate and will
allow you to open samples or temporarily view selected modules.
This will give you great insight on what not to do and some good
ideas on what works well.
4) Timings: Using the above research, I got others to
complete the sample modules to get a feel for timings. The results
were clear, 10 mins good, 15 mins okay, 20 mins kind of okay, 30
mins bad, bad, bad. It's truly better to have a learner complete
2-3 short modules in 30 mins than one big monster. The other
benefit is that shorter files equal smaller size.
5) Narration: It's best to narrate each slide individually
(particularly for screen capture slides). You are more likely to
get it right on the first take, it's easier to edit and you don't
have to re-record the whole thing if you need to update it in
future. To get a slicker effect, use at least two voices: one male,
one female and use slightly different accents.
6) Screen capture slides: If you are recording filling out
long window based databse pages where the compulsory fields are
marked (eg. with a red asterisk) - you don't need to show how to
fill out every field. It's much easier for the learner (and you) to
show how to fill out the first few fields, then fade the screen
capture out, fade the end of the form in with the instructions on
what to do next. This will reduce your file size. In one of my
forms, this meant the removal of about 18 slides!
7) Auto captions: they are verbose (eg. 'Click on Print
Button' instead of 'Click Print'; 'Select the Print Preview item'
instead of 'Select Print Preview'). You have to edit them.
8) PC training syntax: Buttons and hyperlinks should normally
be 'click'; selections from drop down boxes or file lists are
normally 'select': Captivate sometimes mixes them up. Instructions
should always be written in the correct order: eg. Good: Click
'File', Select 'Print Preview'; Bad: Select 'Print Preview' from
the 'File Menu'. Button names, hyperlinks, selections are normally
written in bold
9) Instruction syntax: should always be written in an active
voice: eg. 'Click Options to open the printer menu' instead of
'When the Options button is clicked on, the printer menu will open'
10) Break all modules into chapters. Frame each chapter with
a chapter slide. It's also a good idea to show the Index page
before each chapter slide with a progress indicator (I use an
animated arrow to flash next to the name of the next chapter), I
use a start button rather a 'next' button for the start of each
chapter. You should always have a module overview with the purpose
of the course and a summary slide which states what was covered and
they have complete the module.
11) Put a transparent click button somewhere on each slide.
Set the properties of the click box to take the learner back to the
start of the current chapter by pressing F2. This allows them to
jump back to the start of their chapter at any time. You can also
do a similar thing on the index pages which jumps them to another
chapter.
12) Recording video capture: best to do it at normal speed
and be concious of where your mouse is. Minimise your clicks. Most
people (until they start working with captivate) are sloppy with
their mouse and you end up with lots of unnecessarily slides that
you have to delete out. The speed will default to how you recorded
it and this will reduce the amount of time you spend on changing
timings.
13) Captions: My rule of thumb is minimum of 4 seconds - and
longer depending on the amount of words. Eg. Click 'Print Preview'
is 4 seconds, a paragraph is longer. If you creating knowledge
based modules, make the timing long (eg. 2-3 minutes) and put in a
next button so that the learner can click when they are ready.
Also, narration means the slides will normally be slightly longer.
14) Be creative: Capitvate is desk bound. There are some
learners that just don't respond no matter how interactive
Captivate can be. Incorporate non-captivate and desk free
activities. Eg. As part of our OHS module, there is an activity
where the learner has to print off the floor plan, and then wander
around the floor marking on th emap key items such as: fire exits;
first aid kit, broom and mop cupboard, stationary cupboard, etc.
Good luck!

Validation Best Practice for an javafx project

Hello,
I am investigating how to validate a JavaFX project and specifically where to display the validation results with appropriate icons and text. Do you have any thoughts on best practice for this? Are there any features in JavaFX to do this? Are there any third-party library that does this?
Thanks

See:
Re: Forms and validations - here's some of my ideas, what are yours? "Thread: Forms and validations - here's some of my ideas, what are yours?"
And messages in this mailing list thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/openjfx-dev/2012-February/000717.html "Validate Me"

Best Practice for unimplemented OTC project transports?

Hello,
We implemented and went live with portions of ERP modules COPA, MM, GL(new), and Consolidations 2 years ago as a Phase 1 implementation. Phase 2, which began directly afterwards, included CRM, OTC, and BW. The problem that has come up is that due to numerous implementation issues, we have not gone live with Phase 2 and it is still undetermined when/if we will implement at least OTC in ERP. We have a 3-system (Dev, QA, Prod) ERP landscape and are running into issues due to inconsistencies between QA and Prod. All the transports related to the Phase 2 project were created in Dev and moved into QA, but due to the status of the project were never moved into Production. We recently had an issue with moving changes to our operating concern through the landscape, due to the existing inconsistencies of the operating concern configurations between Dev, QA, and Prod which led to us not being able to re-activate the Operating Concern in Prod until we moved in additional transports that were tied to Phase 2.
My question is this...What would be the best practice/approach to resolving the inconsistencies in our ERP landscape to assure that we have accurate QA testing of our Phase 1 implementation, but also trying not to lose the existing Phase 2 development if we decide to implement OTC in the future? I'm considering the below options:
A) Move all Phase 2 requests
- Refresh QA (via system copy of Prod)
- Move all Phase 2 transports that were originally moved into QA into the refreshed system and test existing Phase 1 business processes to determine risk of moving into Prod
- Move all Phase 2 transports into Prod in order to maintain 3-system consistency
B) 2 system consistency
- Refresh QA (via system copy of Prod)
- Leave all Phase 2 transports in import queue for QA, and maintain Prod/QA consistency only
- OTC implementation can be realized with moving Phase 2 transports through QA at some point in the future
C) "Reset button"
- Refresh QA (via system copy of Prod)
- Refresh Dev (via system copy of Prod) - I'm not sure what technical considerations would need to be made around the development system's role as the origin of rep and dictionary objects and how this can be maintain in a system copy?
- This would wipe out all Phase 2 development
I would greatly appreciate anyone's guidance on our options given our current scenario.
thanks,
John

I would suggest to go with the option A though it seems more work with this option. But this is the only option which can effectively work in the long run. With option B, you will not completely eliminate the problem and with option C, you will loose all your phase 2 work, which will be big waste of the efforts.
Additional advantage with option A is that whenever your organization decides to go-live with Phase 2 work then minimal regression testing will be required as most of your work will be already tested and verified. Regression testing and remediation is significant work whevever a solution is introduced in a working environment.

Best Practices for Maintaining SSAS Projects

We started using SSAS recently and we maintain we one project to deploy to both DEV and PROD instances by changing the deployment properties. However, this gets messy when we introduce new fact tables in to DEV data warehouse (that are not promoted to
Production data warehouse). While we work on adding new measure groups and calculations (based on new fact tables in DEV) we are unable to make any changes to production cube (such as changes to calculations, formatting etc) requested by business
users. Sorry for long question but is there is a best practice to manage projects and migrations? Thanks.

While we work on adding new measure groups and calculations (based on new fact tables in DEV) we are unable to make any changes to production cube (such as changes to calculations, formatting etc) requested by business users.
Hi Sbc_wisc,
You can create a new project by importing the metadata from the production cube on the server, using the template, Import from Server (Multidimensional and Data Mining) Project, in SQL Server Data Tools (SSDT). And then make some changes on this project
and then redeploy it to production server.
Referencec:
Import a Data Mining Project using the Analysis Services Import Wizard
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Best Practice for New Doc Version?

I'm a RH novice who needs to create a V1.1 doc based on the
V1.0 source topics, TOC, and images. I'm using RH HTML X5. What is
my best practice? The previous author left a unclear doc suggesting
something like the following:
Copy the current V1.xpj, V1.hhc, and V1.hhp files and rename
them as V1.1.xpj, V1.1.hhc, and V1.1hhp
Place the renamed files in the V1 root directory and open the
V1.1.xpj file.
Create and edit new content
Not understanding RH too well, this seemed reasonable. It
appears what he is suggesting will bring everything forward in a
new project, but leave the V1 structure intact. I tried this, and
it seemed to be working but I was confused by RH also making
changes to the OLD V1.cpd and V1.pss (I don't know that those files
are).
So, apparently the copied files contain references to at
least the old cpd and pss files (and maybe others). I'm concerned
that continuing down this path will corrupt V1 and leave me
mis-matched conventions. Some files being V1, and some being V1.1.
Is there a how-to somewhere that can help me create a new
version and not muddy up the old? Do any X5 gurus remember how they
did this?
Thanks in advance,
Keith

Peter,
Hopefully you'll see this. I tried you suggestion. Opened the
old file and renamed the project. About 10 links came up broken
that weren't broken before. Any ideas why this would happen. I
didn't make any changes other than the rename.
Thanks,
Keith

Best Practice for SAP BW project implemetation/management

BACKGROUND: I have worked with Microsoft NAV ERP system, but in my new job I am working with SAP BW including BPS.
In Microsoft world we had a framework covering all aspects of a project form pre-sales, analyzis, design, implementation called Sure Step. (http://www.microsoft.com/dynamics/support/implementation/success.aspx)
The framework consist of templates like risk register, business case, requierement collection, questionaries and check-lists. In addition to cover the whole project management part of a project (texts about what should bee done in diffrent phases).
I found a template searching for some BPS stuff http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=SAPBPScreate+questionaree&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CDkQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sdn.sap.com%2Firj%2Fscn%2Findex%3Frid%3D%2Flibrary%2Fuuid%2F90465610-181c-2a10-eba4-eb6d550682f5%26overridelayout%3Dtrue&ei=7EzfTof3DqiQ4gTc0_C9Bg&usg=AFQjCNFJTtkQ8d3c3ZA_NbW0Gpot_m0SwQ
QUESTION:
Does SAP have a similar project framework (for BW) with templates to use in different part of a project, like analysis, design and so on? Is it free for everybody to download and use?

Hello Ramesh,
you should have a look at the SAP Instguide, and if it tells you to do as your colleagues say, open a ticket to SAP and ask, whether doing it the otherw ay could have spoiled your system. Anything but an official "yes, it's ok" won't help you.
For the other guys: have a loook at http://service.sap.com/instguides, there you can find all the guides you need.
kind regards,
Carl

Best practices for hierarchy within project?

I am looking for some advice, here is my situation:
I have am using Labview and the DSC module to create an HMI for a customer. I am connecting through OPC to a PLC, and I have access to over 1000 tags. I don't use them all at the same time, but they are in my project. I have imported them all as Network Shared Bound Variables. I originally created "Virtual Folders" to store the bound variables by data type. However, you are not allowed to view and edit them in the Multiple Variable Editor when they are in Virtual Folders. So, as per recommendation by a Labview Engineer. I converted all my Virtual Folders into "Libraries". That worked well for me as I was able to view and edit my shared variables in the multiple variable editor. But now, as I am attempting to build an application executable, I find that according to this article, I am supposed to combine all of my dependent libraries if I want my library to deploy programmatically. This will lump 1000 variables all in the same folder where they will no longer be sorted by PLC data type. It seems NI engineers and documentation are running me in circles, so I was hoping for a better way. Anybody have any experience with this sort of thing?

I have been playing around with this problem for a little while and have a couple of suggestions for you. The first is to place all of your variables within the same library and use the Multiple Variable Editor to sort the variables by data type. This won't sort them in the project for you, but you will still be able to view and edit your tags by data type. If this isn't quite what you are looking for, another thing you could try would be to use nested libraries. Create a library and place your I/O Server inside. Then create new libraries inside of the original library and arrange the variables inside of these sub-libraries. You should still be able to edit them all in the Multiple Variable Editor and they should all still deploy because they are technically all still inside the same library as their I/O Server. Let me know if this helps.
Regards,
Burt S

Best practices for large ADF projects?

I've heard mention (for example, ADF Large Projects of documentation about dealing with large ADF projects. Where exactly is this documentation? I'm interested in questions like whether Fusion web applications can have more than one ViewController project (different names, of course), more than one Model project, the best way to break up applications for ease of maintenance, etc. Thanks.
Mark

I'd like to mention something:
Better have unix machines for your development.
Have at least 3 GB of RAM on windows machines.
Create all your commonly used LOVs & VOs first.
If you use web services extensively, create it as a seperate app.
Make use of popups, it's very user friendly and fast too. You no need to deal with browser back button.
If you want to use common page template, create it at the beginning. It's very difficult if you want to apply it later after you developed pages.
Use declarative components for commonly used forms like address, etc.
Search the forum, you will see couple of good util classes.
When you check-in the code, watch out some of the files don't show up in JDev like connections.xml
Make use of this forum, you will get answers immediately from great experts.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/collateral/4gl/papers/Introduction_Best_Practices.pdf

Best practice for new analytical authorizations

Coming from old RSR concept, I'm currently trying to find a good solution for developing roles using the new authorization concept.
In BW 3.x, I just entered the activites directly into the authorization objects. Now, with the new analytical authorizations, I have to assign them via a single auth object. But what is the recommended way for the distribution of auth-relevant InfoObjects into single authorizations?
Example: let's say we have marked 0COSTCENTER as auth-relevant. In the old RSR concept, I just added the corresponding authobject to the role and entered the number of the cost center.
Now, with the new authorization concept, I first have to build an authorization for every cost center (CC1000, CC1001, ...) and then assign the corresponding CC authorization to the role using S_RS_AUTH.
That means, if I need to restrict the "usual" InfoObjects like cost center, company code, plant, etc., I have to prebuild thousands of AAs beforehand. Did I miss something? This new concept looks to me way more costly than the old concept.

Hi,
When you have to deal with many authorization objects and many roles you can:
Use two kind of roles:
1. Make roles where you define what can be used for reporting eg. rights to infoobjects (you don't define S_RS_AUTH authorization object here),
2. Then you create special roles (say: ZBI_ROLE_(1..xx)_AUTH ) where you define rights to data that could be displayed (eg. restricting 0bus_area). In each that role you should define relevant authorization object (S_RS_AUTH).
You can combine theese roles to users:
User 1
ZBI_ROLE_1 (definition what data is allowed )
ZBI_ROLE_5
ZBI_ROLE_1_AUTH (eg. for 0bus_area=0001)
ZBI_ROLE_2_AUTH (eg. for 0bus_area=0002)
ZBI_ROLE_3_AUTH (eg. for 0bus_area=0003)
and so on ...
Hope that helps,
Leszek

Best Practice for E&C and Professional Services

Hello Experts,
Where do I find the Best Practice for implementing Oracle Projects, specific to Industries like E&C, Professional Services, Etc.
Thanks

Hi Anuj,
Thanks for the links, they have been helpful.
I understand now that OSR is only meant to contain only Proxy services. The synch facility is between OSR and OSB so that in case when you are not using OER, you can publish Proxy services to OSR from OSB. What I didn't understand was why there was a option to publish a Proxy service back to OSB and why it ended up as a Business service. From the link you provided, it mentioned that this case is for multi-domain OSBs, where one OSB wants to use the other OSB's service. It is clear now.
Some more questions:
1) In the design-time, in OER no Endpoints are generated for Proxy services. Then how do we publish our design-time services to OSR for testing purposes? What is the correct way of doing this?
Thanks,
Umar

(Request for:) Best practices for setting up a new Windows Server 2012 r2 Hyper-V Virtualized AD DC

Could you please share your best practices for setting up a new Windows Server 2012 r2 Hyper-V Virtualized AD DC, that will be running on a new WinSrv 2012 r2 host server. (This
will be for a brand new network setup, new forest, domain, etc.)
Specifically, your best practices regarding:
the sizing of non virtual and virtual volumes/partitions/drives,
the use of sysvol, logs, & data volumes/drives on hosts & guests,
RAID levels for the host and the guest(s),
IDE vs SCSI and drivers both non virtual and virtual and the booting there of,
disk caching settings on both host and guests.
Thanks so much for any information you can share.

A bit of non essential additional info:
We are small to midrange school district who, after close to 20 years on Novell networks, have decided to design and create a new Microsoft network and migrate all of our data and services
over to the new infrastructure . We are planning on rolling out 2012 r2 servers with as much Hyper-v virtualization as possible.
During the last few weeks we have been able to find most of the information we need to undergo this project, and most of the information was pretty solid with little ambiguity, except for
information regarding virtualizing the DCs, which as been a bit inconsistent.
Yes, we have read all the documents that most of these posts tend point to, but found some, if not most are still are referring to performing this under Srvr 2008 r2, and haven’t really
seen all that much on Srvr2012 r2.
We have read these and others:
Introduction to Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) Virtualization (Level 100),
Virtualized Domain Controller Technical Reference (Level 300),
Virtualized Domain Controller Cloning Test Guidance for Application Vendors,
Support for using Hyper-V Replica for virtualized domain controllers.
Again, thanks for any information, best practices, cookie cutter or otherwise that you can share.
Chas.

Best practices for folder structure in SOA Project

Actually, In my project, I have more than 10 BPEL process and several DBAdapters and some HumanTasks. For each BPEL process, JDeveloper creates .bpel, .componentType, wsdl files. For DBAdapters JDeveloper creates lot of files, and same for HumanTasks as well.
By default Jdeveloper puts all these files in root directory of the Project. It looks messy having 100's of files in root directory.
How can I organize all these files?
What are the best practices for folder structure in SOA Project ?
Thanks

Yes Yatan. I did noticed that Polling service WSDL disabled in EM . But I want to try this approach beacause I want to move all database related stuff to one composite. I have another composite with 3 BPEL Processes. One BPEL queries external webservice and save the response in DB. One BPEL just fires the first Process(Query) and respond to caller with an unique id. I have Another BPEL which keeps polling on database for 5 sec(I'm using PICK Activity), if there is any new record in database it will retrun to caller. If no new records in database, returns empty to the caller after 5 sec.
If I put all these in one composite, having lot of files in root directory, the composite really looks very messy.
As you said, I want to have 2 composites. First Compoiste will have 3 BPEL processes, and 2nd Composite will have DB Polling and DB Save. I will have another project for MDS to store XSDs.
So because I can't have Polling service as exposed service, I have to keep Polling service in the same Composite where the BPEL is. Now again it goes back to Big and messy project.
Is there any way I can separate all DB related including polling in a separate Composite ?
Thanks
--Sreeny

Best Practices for Defining NDS Java Projects...

We are doing a Proof of Concept on using NDS to develop non-SAP Java applications. We are attempting to determine if we can replace our current Java development tools with NDS/WAS.
We are struggling with SAP's terminology and "plumbing" for setting up/defining Java projects. For example, what is and when do you define Tracks, Software Components, Development Components, etc. All of these terms are totally foreign to us and do not relate to our current Java environment (at least not that we can see). We are also struggling with how the DTR and activities tie in to those components.
If any one has defined best practices for setting up Java projects or has struggled with and overcome these same issues, please provide us with some guidance. This is a very frustrating and time-consuming issue for us.
Thank you!!

Hi Peggy,
In Component Model we divide software projects into small components.Components can use other components in well defined manner.
A development object is a part of a component that can be changed or developed in some way; it provides the component with a certain part of its functionality. A development object may be a Java class, a Web Dynpro view, a table definition, a JSP page, and so on. Development objects are always stored as sources in a repository.
A development component can be defined as a frame shared by a number of objects, which are part of the software.
Software components combine components (DCs) to larger units for delivery and deployment.
A track comprises configurations and runtime systems required for developing software component versions.It ensures stable states of deliverables used by subsequent tracks.
The Design Time Repository is for versioning source code management. Distributed development of software in teams. Transport and replication of sources.
You can also find lot of support in SDN for the above concepts with tutorials.
Refer this Link for a overview on Java development Infrastructure(JDI)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/webas/java/java development infrastructure jdi overview.pdf
To understand further
Working with Net Weaver Development Infrastructure :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/03/f6bc3d42f46c33e10000000a11405a/content.htm
In the above link you can find all the concepts clearly explained.You can also find the required tutorials for development.
Regards,
Vijith

Best Practice for new BI project

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for