Best practice for sharing html content on different group spaces?

How can html content be shared between several group spaces?
One way I have found is to add a html doc to ucm and then to add this doc as a iframe to a page.
Are there other ways, like adding on one group space page a html layout element and then to view this content in a different space. How could this be done, with an expression language reference?
Has someone experience in presenting the same html content on different spaces and can share how he does it. Any ideas are welcome.
Thanks,
Max

Hey Max,
Check out our technical whitepaper on Integrating ECM with Portal Technologies.
Our "Fishbowl Portlets" allow you to share any content - HTML, WYSIWYG user generated content, documents etc - in multiple contexts (portlets, web apps, etc).
This is one of the things that we showcased as the recent Collaborate conference in Vegas - WebCenter framework, UCM and the portlets surfacing the same items in different contexts - all personalization aware, configurable and end user/super user editable.
The white paper can be found here:
http://www.fishbowlsolutions.com/StellentSolutions/ContentManagementResources/index.htm
A blog post on it can be found here:
http://cfour.fishbowlsolutions.com/2010/03/10/fishbowl-portlets-followup-cis-and-content-consumption-options/
warmly,
Billy Cripe
Fishbowl Solutions

Similar Messages

  • Best practice for sharing data with model window

    Hi team,
    what would the best practice for sharing data with a modal
    window be ? I use a modal window to display record details from a
    record list, but i am not quite sure how to access the data from
    the components in the main application in the modal window.
    Any hints would be welcome
    Best
    Frank

    Pass a reference to the parent into the modal popup. Then you
    can reference anything in the parent scope.
    I haven't done this i 2.0 yet so I can't give you code. I'll
    post if I do.
    Oh, also, you can reference the parent using parentDocument.
    So in the popup you could do:
    parentDocument.myPublicVariable = "whatever";
    Tracy

  • Best practice for multi-language content in common areas

    I've got a site with some text in header/footer/nav that needs to be translated between an English and Spanish site, which use the same design. My intention was to set up all the text as content to facilitate. However, if I use a standard dialog with the component's path set to a child of the current page node, I would need to re-enter the text on every page. If I use a design dialog, or a standard dialog with the component's path set absolutely, the Engilsh and Spanish sites will share the same text. If I use a standard dialog with the component's path set relatively (eg path="../../jcr:content/myPath"), the pages using the component would all need to be at the same level of the hierarchy.
    It appears that the Geometrixx demo doesn't address this situation, and leaves copy in English. Is there a best practice for this scenario?

    I'm finding that something to the effect of <cq:include path="<%= strCommonContentPath + "codeEntry" %>" resourceType ...
    works fine for most components, but not for parsys, or a component containing a parsys. When I attempt that, I get a JS error that says "design.path is null or not an object". Is there a way around this?

  • "Best practice" for components calling components on different panels.

    I'm very new to Swing. I have been learning from tutorials, but these are always relatively simple interfaces , in which every component and container is initialised and added in the constructor of a main JFrame (extension) object.
    I would assume that more complex, real-world examples would have JPanels initialise themselves. For example, I am working on a project in which the JFrame holds multiple JPanels. One of these Panels holds a group of JToggleButtons (grouped in a ButtonGroup). The action event for each button involves calling the repaint method of one of the other Panels.
    Obviously, if you initialise everything in the JFrame, you can simply have the ActionListener refer to the other JPanel directly, by making the ActionListener a nested class within the JFrame class. However, I would like the JPanels to initialise their own components, including setting the button actions, by using an extension of class JPanel which includes the ActionListeners as nested classes. Therefore the ActionListener has no direct access to JPanel it needs to repaint.
    What, then, is considered "best practice" for allowing these components to interact (not simply in this situation, but more generally)? Should I pass a reference to the JPanel that needs to be repainted to the JPanel that contains the ActionListeners? Should I notify the main JFrame that the Action event has fired, and then have that call "repaint"? Or is there a more common or more correct way of doing this?
    Similarly, one of the JPanels needs to use a field belonging to the JFrame that holds it. Should I pass a reference to this object to the JPanel, or should I have the JPanel use "getParent()", or some other method?
    I realise there are no concrete answers to this query, but I am wondering whether there are accepted practices for achieving this. My instinct is to simply pass a JPanel reference to the JPanel that needs to call repaint, but I am unsure how extensible this would be, how tightly coupled these classes would become.
    Any advice anybody could give me would be much appreciated. Sorry the question is so long-winded. :)

    Hello,
    nice to get feedback.
    I've been looking at a few resources on this issue from my last post. In my application I have been using the Observer and Observable classes to implement the MVC pattern suggested by T.PD.(...)
    Two issues (not fatal, but annoying) with this are:
    -Observable is a class, not an interface; since most of my Observers already extend JPanel (or some such), I have had to create inner classes.
    -If an Observer is observing multiple Observables, it will have to determine which Observer called its update() method (by using reference equality or class comparison or whatever). Again, a very minor issue, but something to keep in mind.I don't deem those issues are minor. The second one in particular, is rather annoying in terms of maintenance ("Err, remind me, which widget is calling this "update()" method?").
    In addition to that, the Observable/Observer are legacy non-generified classes, that incurr a loosely-typed approach (the subject and context arguments to the update(Observable subject, Object context) methods give hardly any info in themselves, and they generally have to be cast to provide app-specific information.
    Note that the "notification model" from AWT and Swing widgets is not Observer-Observable, but merely EventListener . Although we can only guess what reasons made them develop a specific notification model, I deem this essentially stems from those reasons.
    The contrasting appraoches are discussed in this article from Bill Venners: The Event Generator Idiom (http://www.artima.com/designtechniques/eventgenP.html).
    N.B.: this article is from a previous-millenary series of "Design Techniques" articles that I found very useful when I learned OO design (GUI or not).
    One last nail against the Observer/Observable model: these are general classes that can be used regardless of the context (GUI/non-GUI code), so this makes it easier to forget about Swing threading rules when using them (essentially: is the update method called in the EDT or not).
    If anybody has any information on the performance or efficiency of using Observable/ObserverI would be very surprised if this had any performance impact. If it had, that would mean that you have either:
    - a lot of widgets that are listening to one another (and then the Mediator pattern is almost a must to structure such entangled dependencies). And even then I don't think there could be any impact below a few thousands widgets.
    - expensive or long-running computation in the update methods. That's unrelated to the notification model itself.
    - a lot of non-GUI components that use the Observer/Observable to communicate among themselves - all the more risk then, to have a GUI update() called outside the EDT, see remark above.
    (or whether there are inbuilt equivalents for Swing components)See discussion above.
    As far as your remark 2 goes (if one observer observes more than one subjects, the update() method contains branching logic) : this also occurs with the Event Delegation model indeed: for example, it is quite common that people complain that their actionPerformed() method becomes unwieldy when the same class listens for several JButtons.
    The usual advice for this is, use anonymous listeners, each of which handles the event from only one source (and generally very close in code to the definition of that source), and that simply translates the "generic" event notification method into a specific method call of a Controller or Mediator .
    Best regards.
    J.
    Edited by: jduprez on May 9, 2011 10:10 AM

  • Best Practices for sharing media with iMovie and FCPX

    So I've a large iMovie Events directory, and would like to use that media with both iMovie and FCPX projects.
    I'd rather not duplicate the media, so would prefer to import as references into FCPX.
    The dilemma is that I see that it's possible to modify or move media from within the iMovie application, and therefore break the reference to that media with FCPX.
    I only see two options:  (1) Never Ever modify the location/name of media in the iMovie Events file (even from within the iMovie app) since I would break an FCPX link if that media is referenced, or (2) always import (copy) the iMovie events into the FCPX Event Library making an independent original so that I can confidently operate on those media files in either application.
    I'd surely rather not have to do (2 )(e.g. doubling my storage demands) to gain the flexibility of using either application to edit the video, but really don't want to live with the restrictions of (1).
    Thoughts / Solutions?  What might you consider as options or best practices?

    Unless there is some other reason, users should own the right to share their mailboxes - it shouldn't be something that demands administrator management (if only so that the administrators aren't swamped by user requests for sharing their mailboxes). 
    For true shared mailboxes, when the mailbox is created, full access is granted by an administrator.

  • Best Practice for Searching HTML Source

    Hello
    What is the best way to search the content of html files?
    These would be files I create.
    I have tried to use SpotLight but it's not up to it.
    The best thing I have found thus far is Multi-File Search in BBEdit.
    There I find my annotations under '/* NOTES:'
    Thanks

    Thanks for the response, but unfortunately the provided links are not much help:
    - The first link is about an article I don't have access to (i'm not a registered user)
    - The second link is about Integration Services. This is nice for Integration stuff, but I need to have a functionality within a frontend. 
    - The third link is for use in Excel.
    Maybe I'm looking for the wrong thing when wanting to create an extra column with "cleaned" up data. Maybe there's another solution from within my frontend or business layer, but I simply want a textbox on a form where users can type a search-value like
    "BAKKER". The result of the search should return names like "DEBACKER", "DE BEKKER", "BACKER", "BAKRE", ...
    I used to work in a hospital where they wrote their own SQL-function (on an Interbase database) to do this: They had a column with the original name, and a column with a converted name:
    => DEBACKER => Converted = DEBAKKER
    => DE BEKKER => Converted = DEBEKKER
    => BACKER => Converted = BAKKER
    => BAKRE => Converted = BAKKER
    When you searched for "BAKKER", you did a LIKE operation on the converted column ...
    What I am looking for is a good function to convert my data as above.
    Greetz,
    Tim

  • Best Practices for Creating eLearning Content With Adobe

    As agencies are faced with limited resources and travel restrictions, initiatives for eLearning are becoming more popular. Come join us as we discuss best practices and tips for groups new to eLearning content creation, and the best ways to avoid complications as you grow your eLearning library.
    In this webinar, we will take on common challenges that we have seen in eLearning deployments, and provide simple methods to avoid and overcome them. With a little training and some practice, even beginners can create engaging and effective eLearning content using Adobe Captivate and Adobe Presenter. You can even deploy content to your learners with a few clicks using the Adobe Connect Training Platform!
    Sign up today to learn how to:
    -Deliver self-paced training content that won't conflict with operational demands and unpredictable schedules
    -Create engaging and effective training material optimized for knowledge retention
    -Build curriculum featuring rich content such as quizzes, videos, and interactivity
    -Track program certifications required by Federal and State mandates
    Come join us Wednesday May 23rd at 2P ET (11A PT): http://events.carahsoft.com/event-detail/1506/realeyes/
    Jorma_at_RealEyes
    RealEyes Connect

    You can make it happen by creating a private connection for 40 users by capi script and when creating portlet select 2nd option in Users Logged in section. In this the portlet uses there own private connection every time user logs in.
    So that it won't ask for password.
    Another thing is there is an option of entering password or not in ASC in discoverer section, if your version 10.1.2.2. Let me know if you need more information
    thnaks
    kiran

  • Best practices for sharing mailboxes

    Hello,
    To share mailboxes, I am not sure of the 'best practices'. 
    From my point of view, there are two scenarios :
    classic mailbox : an user A wants to share his mailbox so it assigns rights on his mailbox for an userB via Outlook. The userB will add the userA's mailbox to his profile
    shared mailbox : the rights are managed by the administrator
    Is it correct to divide the management (i.e classic user manages his own mailbox and the administrator manages rights on shared mailbox) or is not ?
    And the delegation functionnality in Outlook is not really what I want because the userB must have only access to the mailbox (+calendar+contacts) but he hasn't to manage the appointments, etc.
    Thanks for your help

    Unless there is some other reason, users should own the right to share their mailboxes - it shouldn't be something that demands administrator management (if only so that the administrators aren't swamped by user requests for sharing their mailboxes). 
    For true shared mailboxes, when the mailbox is created, full access is granted by an administrator.

  • Best practices for sharing iPhoto libraries across multiple Macs

    I have a pair of iMacs running 10.6.x. and iPhoto 11 connected via Ethernet to an Airport Extreme. I am looking for a way to share my iPhoto library between the two Macs.
    I found an Apple Support note on the topic (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1198) which states that a disk image is a supported location for a shared iPhoto library (with limitations acceptable to me) and it strikes me that this would be a way of hosting a shared iPhoto library onto a NAS device.
    Am I missing a simpler solution or, more importantly, am I missing any blindingly obvious caveats? I'd love to hear from anybody who has tried this (successfully or otherwise) or anybody who has a better idea. I haven't bought a NAS device yet, so I'm open to alternative suggestions.
    Specific requirements:
    Members of my family use either one of a pair of iMacs.
    The only user who edits the iPhoto library is me and I only need read/write access from one machine.
    iPhoto library access limited to one user at a time is acceptable and practical in my case.

    Easiest:
    If the other users only get to see the Library then just use iPhoto Sharing.
    Enable sharing in the iPhoto Preferences on the Host machine, then go to the other macgine and in the same location enable 'Look for Shared Libraries'
    Other forms of sharing will give the users read/write access to the Library.
    A strong warning: If you're trying to edit the Library (that is, make albums, move photos around, keyword, make books or slideshows etc.) or edit individual photos in it via Wireless be very careful. Dropouts are a common fact of wireless networking, and should one occur while the app is writing to the database then your Library will be damaged. Simply, I would not do this with my Libraries. 
    Regards
    TD

  • Best practices for translating FrameMaker content?

    I'm interested in learning from Adobe or experienced users about best practices to follow (or references worth reading) about translating FrameMaker publications.

    Haven't done this for a while, but I believe the first recommendation used to be "work with a reputable translation agency who will accept, translate and return .mif files." fwiw, I still remember a run-in with one agency that claimed they did but didn't … they passed our .mif files on to translators who used Word =8-} The result in our case was that all the autonumbering in a long, complex regulatory document failed, because Word had slipped a fine-space character in before every colon in the French translation.
    A separate issue is whether it's worth moving to structured Frame, which is said to make translation management easier as your document evolves.
    There'll be lots of people who can give you more complete, more up-to-date answers, though.

  • Best Practice for Shared Contacts available as an Address Book in Outlook??

    Yep so crazy that Microsoft still refuses (by design) to enable address book option for Shared contacts!!!!!!!  So I am asking what do they suggest then for my clients to have a shared contact list that is available as an address book and available
    to sync to your phone?
    Problem:
    I have a client that the boss has a contact list in his outlook that he has synced to his phone that is shared so that everyone else on his team can see the contacts, since it is a shared contact list users are not able to add it to their address book (by
    design..nice design)
    Solutions I know of:
    1.Use public folder for contact list...= Nope public folder contact list will not sync with his iphone/ipad...(yes there are 3rd party tools but I would prefer to not go this route)
    2.Sharepoint....I have heard this one but don't know much about it.   How does it sync to outlook and phones?  Is it seemless?  can user add contacts in outlook?
    3. ??
    Seems like this would be a huge issue that microsoft would have fixed by now.  Let me know if anyone has any ideas... 
    Sbs 2003 I will miss you !!!!

    Hi,
    For more methods of making Shared Contacts available as an Address Book, you can refer to the following articles:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/9d20ffad-d49a-4aa3-8d49-c63b8d4583ee/adding-shared-contacts-to-the-address-book-without-public-folders-in-outlook-2010?forum=outlook
    Add shared Contacts folder as Address Book list:
    http://www.msoutlook.info/question/614
    Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. The sites are not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or information found there. Please make
    sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
    Hope it can help you.
    Thanks,
    Angela
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Best practice for sharing LOV's over multiple Application Definitions?

    We want to define/generate (complex) LOV's in 1 place and use them in multiple sub-applications (different application definition files).
    What is the best practive to accomplish this?
    Frank

    Frank,
    Here is what you do:
    - Generate the LOV the "normal" way using your first app def file
    - In all other app def files, you create a "dummy" LOV group by the same name with the same items, so you can associate items with the LOV and specifiy return values
    - For each "dummy" LOV group uncheck the checkboxes "Generate Pages", "Generate Page Definitions" and "Generate Controller Group". (only visible in expert mode)
    - Make sure you first generate the first app def file before you run the [ages generated by other app def files.
    Steven Davelaar,
    JHeadstart Team.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

  • Best practices for sharing a SAN-attached tape loader between servers.

    When configuring zones to allow a tape loader to be shared by multiple servers, is there a preferred zoning method?
    For instance, I have my primary fabric configured so that the zone for each data server using a LUN on my array consists of the primary port of the HBA on the server and the primary port of the HBA for each controller on my array.
    My backup server does not use any LUNs on the array, so its zone consists solely of its primary HBA port and the HBA port of the tape loader.
    If I want give my data servers access to the tape loader, should I add the tape loader's port to the zone of each server, or should I add the port of each server to the zone that currently consists of only the backup server and the tape loader?
    Or does it matter?
    The network is small:
    One Windows server dedicated to backup, three NetWare servers handling data storage and 12 other VM servers running a mixture of Linux, NetWare, and Windows that handle various services but don't contain any significant amounts of data.
    My intent is to give the 3 data servers access to the tape loader directly, so that their backup streams don't involve the LAN.
    The remaining servers are small enough that backing them up over the LAN is not an issue.
    I doubt that it matters for this, but the SAN switches are MDS9124's and the SAN array is an HDS AMS2100 with active/active controllers.
    All server HBA's are dual port, as are the HBA's on each array controller.
    In addition to the primary zone, each server and the array controllers are attached to a failover zone via the 2nd port of the HBA's.
    Unfortunately, my backup software doesn't support NDMP, so I can't back up the array LUN's directly to the tape loader.

    NDMP is for backing up NAS platforms.
    Does your backup software support "LAN-Free" backup ? Typically enterprise backup software like Netbackup, TSM, Networker require a special license/agent that gets loaded on server where you are going to implement LAN-Free backups. Without that software/license servers will be fighting for tape resources and it will be a mess (if it works at all). Also you want to use dedicated HBA or port on dual HBA for tape traffic, do not mix tape and disk traffic on the same HBA/port. In big shops people configure dedicated "tape" VSANs but that would be an overkill for your current environment.
    @dynamoxxx

  • What is best practice for multi camera edit with differing lengths?

    I have three cameras that took video of an engagement party. Camera A and B took it all (with some early extra material exclusive to each camera). Camera C took some, then stopped, then took more.
    So I have four sets of clips - A and B which are complete, then C then D.
    Should I create sequence 1 with A, B and C synchonised, then create sequence 2 with A, B and D synchronised, then sequence 3 with sundry early non-multi camera clips, plus sequence 1 plus sequence 2 then late non-multi camera clips?
    Or can I synchronise A, B and C, then on the same timeline synchronise A, B and D? I'm concerned that the second synchronisation will put C out of sync.
    What is the best way to approach this?
    Thanks in advance.

    A and B which are complete, then C then D.
    I think you're looking at this in the wrong way.  You have only three cameras, A, B and C, but you don't really have a D camera, as those are just other clips from camera C.  You might call them C1 and C2 if you like, but calling them D seems to be confusing the issue, as it's still only three cameras, and three shots to choose from when cutting the sequence.  (Except for the gap between C clips, where you will have only the A and B shots to choose.)
    You can absolutely sync all the clips form camera C on the same sequence as A and B.  And it will probably be easier to do so.

  • Best practice for Admin viewing contents of network homes

    How are you viewing the contents of your users' network home directories in the gui?
    Is there a better way than logging in locally as root? I'd like to do this over AFP if possible.
    Can I make an HomeAdmins group and propogate that group to have read access to all users' home folders? How about for new homes that are subsequently created?
    Thanks,
    b.

    You probably know this already, but:
    1. Nothing bad should happen if you change the group owner of your home directories unless you're using the current group ownership for something important.
    2. If you set the setgid bit on the root directory of the sharepoint and it is owned by the admin group then new folders created within should have the group owner you want. There are various ways to ensure the home directories would have the proper permissions.

Maybe you are looking for