Best Practice Implementation in landscape

Hi,
We had requirement for implementing SAP BP in our landscape on ECC system. Do we require to install Bp's on all three systems (Dev, Qas, Prd). Or the configuration change request movement into QAS and Prod is sufficient with out implementing BP's there.
Thankyou.
Regards.

Look into using NWDI as your source code control (DTR) and transport/migration from dev through to production.  This also will handle the deployment to your dev system (check-in/activate).
For unit testing and debugging you should be running a local version (NWDW).  This way once the code is ready to be shared with the team, you check it in (makes it visible to other team members) and activate it (deploys it to development server).
We are currently using a separate server for WD applications rather than running them on the portal server.  However, this does not allow for the WD app to run in the new WD iView.  So it depends on what the WD app needs to do an have access to.  Of course there is always the Federated Portal Network as an option, but that is a whole other topic.
For JCo connections, WD uses a connection name and this connection can be set up to point to different locations depending on which server it is on.  So on the development server the JCo connection can point to the dev back-end and in prod point to the prod back-end.  The JCo connections are not migrated, but setup in each system.
I hope this helps.  There is a lot of documentation available for NWDI to get you started.  See:  http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/01/9c4940d1ba6913e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
-Cindy

Similar Messages

  • Best Practice Implementation for Enterprise Portal

    hi,
    I am doing Best Practice Implementation on Enterprise Portal.
    In that i cant find one file. Can you please help me in finding these file "BP_RAPID_ALL.epa"
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards,
    Raju

    Hi All,
    Till now no one has answered for my query.
    can i know is there any replacment for this file(BP_RAPID_ALL.epa) in new version of Best Practices.
    Regards,
    Raju
    Edited by: V R K Raju P on Feb 17, 2009 1:04 PM

  • Portal Best Practice Implementation

    hi,
    I am doing Best Practice Implementation on Enterprise Portal.
    In that i cant find one file. Can you please help me in finding these file "BP_RAPID_ALL.epa"
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards,
    Raju

    No one answered for this problem.

  • Best Practices Implementation on Enterprise Portal

    Hi All,
    Can you please explain me what is Best Practice Implementation and Also please help me in Best Practices Implementation on Enterprise Portal.
    Regards,
    P V R K Raju
    Edited by: V R K Raju P on Feb 11, 2009 12:25 PM
    Edited by: V R K Raju P on Feb 11, 2009 12:25 PM

    Raju,
    The best practices are all scenario based.
    You may however check them out.
    help.sap.com -> Best Practices.
    Best Practice for Portal =>
    http://help.sap.com/content/bestpractices/crossindustry/bestp_crossindustry_ep.htm
    http://help.sap.com/bp_epv170/EP_US/HTML/Portals_intro.htm
    Regards,
    Ritu

  • Best practice implementation. What are the steps for this?.

    We had an upgrade from CRM 4 to 7 undertaken by some outfit (name deleted). After the upgrade was complete it would look as though the comapny carried on using the GUI interface rather than the WebUI interface, mainly because that's how CRM 4 worked. Now they would like to use the WebUI interface of CRM 7, as the GUI interface is no longer supported, but are receiving a number of errors when using certain features of teh WebUI. It would look as though a lot of config is missing, especially in the UI Framework area. I can only assume that whichever company performed the upgarde simply skipped this section when upgrading.
    I assume that I could download the best practice install/upgrade (?) and then just execute the section regarding the UI Framework, if such a section exists. bearing in mind that there seems to be a lot of config missing in the UI Framework section, would you recommend the course of action that I have mentioned?.
    Our WebUI Interaction centre is giving errors when we go in and I have been informed that I need to complete the config for:
    Customer Relationship Management->UI Framework->UI Framework Definition->Maintain Runtime Framework Profile
    But as I mentioned, there are lots of other sections in the UI Framework area that are empty and hence the suggestion I made above. Hopwever, I would specifically be interested to hear from anyone who can tell me what the entries are in the view table BSPWDV_RF_PROF_C and possibly the table BSPWDV_CTRL_REPL and BSPWDV_DEF_CC.
    I know this only completes part of the config, but it might be enough so that the WebUI IC can be viewed.
    On another subject, I have just come into this company and if I wanted to see what had been installed how do I go about that. for example, if I wanted to know if there had been an upgrade from 4 to 7 for a particular Industry solution, where do I check this?.
    Jason

    I have been through the following steps:
    Entered this URL http://help.sap.com/bp/initial/index.htm
    Clicked on 'Cross-industry Packages'
    Clicked on 'CRM'
    Clicked on 'Englilsh'
    Then the following page is displayed:
    http://help.sap.com/bp_crm70/CRM_DE/HTML/index.htm displayed
    But now what?. How do I get the Best practice instructions for a CRM implemenation?.
    Jason

  • Inconsistency in best practice implementation guides

    Hi gurus.
    We are assisting a customer to install a Best Practice solution running Baseline Austrian 2.600 and IM&C 2.600.
    My main issue is the requirements for the supportpackages differ.
    This inconsistency are valid for all components, but exemplified here by the SAP_BASIS component.
    The Baseline 2.600 Austriandemands the following support package :
    http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/BL_Austria/documentation/BL_Quick_Guide_EN_AT.doc
    SAP_BASIS     700     0010     SAPKB70010     SAP Basis Component
    The Industry Solution IM&C 2.600 demands the following support package
    http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/Documentation/E00_BB_InstallGuide_EN_DE.doc
    SAP_BASIS     700     0007     SAPKB70007     SAP Basis Component
    Both installation guides contain similar statements that support packages must me on correct version, not higher and not lower, otherwise only limitied support can be given.
    Anyone that have had any similare experience or anyone that can give me some pointers on what to do?
    Regards
    Fredrik

    No one able to answer....

  • Some issue in Best Practice Implementation

    Hi,
    When i try to "Register Item for New system" in
    System Administration --> System Configuration -->Universal Worklist & Workflow --> Universal WorkList - Administration,
    i am getting the following error :
    Errors:
    System SAPRETAIL: Mon Mar 09 12:25:43 IST 2009
    (Connector) :com.sap.netweaver.bc.uwl.connect.ConnectorException:Mon Mar 09 12:25:43 IST 2009
    (Connector) :com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception:Issuer of SSO ticket is not authorized
    Item type retrieval and registration requires a connection to the systems and may take a couple of minutes.  Please be patient.
    For each system they are generated as the configuration named 'uwl.webflow.<systemalias>' or 'uwl.alert.<systemalias>'.
    After configuration changes on the backend, the system has to be re-registered.
    *Here SAPRETAIL is the system alias name.*
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards,
    Raju

    No one able to answer....

  • Best Practice of using ERM (Role Expert) in Landscape

    Hello,
    Can anyone tell me what is the best practice (choice) of using ERM in the SAP landscape?
    1. Creating a role in DEV system using ERM and using SAP standard transport process to transport role to QAS and PRD systems.
    OR
    2. Creating a role in all systems in ladscape (DEV, QAS and PRD).
    Please share if you have any best practice implementation scenarios.
    Appreciate for the help.
    Thanks
    Harry.

    Harry,
       The best practice is to follow Option 1. You should never directly create a role in Prod system. This is what SAP recommends as well.
    Alpesh

  • Best practice SAP landscape

    Hello all,
    I would like to know if there is some kind of best practice regarding SAP landscape in a big company.
    For example is it recommended to have in the landscape a SAP Quality Assurance System open for customizing (transaction SCC4) so that quick customizing tests are performed at any moment, instead of customizing in Development system and then transports in QaS. (this can be very frustrating because for solving and testing an issue it's possible that numerous customizing tasks and reset of customzing is neccessary) ?
    How SAP compliant would this solution be?
    Thank you very much for your help!
    Daniel Nicula

    Hmmm, I do not know exactly if the question can be posed here in GRC related threads.
    But it seemed to me that it is somehow connected.
    Anyway, I agree with you that final customizing should be done in DEV and then transported in QAS.
    What i am not sure is if it is against SAP recommendations to have a QAS opened for customizing and try all the solutions for an issue. And in the end when you are sure of what you want to do and to obtain, then you do the customizing also in DEV and follow the normal transport route.
    Which can be the risks in case you have a QAS opened for customizing?
    Thank you.

  • Implement Best Practice in existing system

    Hi,
    I am trying to figure out the smartest way to implement best practice.
    The only problem is that it is to be implemented in an existing landscape containing a Finance solution.
    We will implement IM&C which mainly comes with complete new configuration.
    It is more or less impossible to implement the Best Practise in the existing system, so we have to install a new system on the correct support package and create transport requests from this system to the existing development system.
    Now we face the problem of overwriting existing code in the development system.
    Any one with any experience of similar problems?
    All help is appreciated.
    Regards Fredrik

    No one able to answer....

  • SLD Landscape Best Practice recomendation

    I am seeking advise on setting up SLD in my ever growing landscape.
    I currently have a Master SLD on the same system as my NWDI system and a local SLD on my Solution manager 7.0 system that is updated from the master.
    The Master SLD is shared by our ECC6 Duel Stack landscape and my BI 70 Duel stack portal landscape.
    I have upcoming projects of implementing a PI 7.1 landscape, implementing CTS+ and a Solution Manager Enterprise upgrade all of which will be heavily dependent on SLD.  
    I have seen documentation that PI would like it's own local SLD.
    My question is what would be the prefered SLD landscape and how to I get there.  Any recomendations or best practices would be most appreciated.
    Bill Stouffer
    Basis Administrator.

    Hi,
    SLD that we have implemented in our landscape is like bleow:
    1) All PI  and Portal system has local SLD.
    2) For all non- production system, we have one SLD and production system we have seperate SLD.
    3) It means we are following 3 tier SLD landscape as resommended by SAP.
    4) Main SLd lies on solman, for production  we have seperate and non-production we have seperate. non production and production sld sent data to main sld that is on solman.
    4) All systems except PI and portal send data to production and non-production sld. PI and portal systems first send data to local which in turns send to production and non-production sld.
    5) So by this way you whole environment is secure as production sld is different.
    So, i will recommend to have 3 tier SLD approach. One of the important thing is don't use cenrtal user to send data across SLD as one user lock will in turns be the fallback of whole environment. So, always make each system specific user for data transfer so that user lock of one system will not impact other.
    If you need any other information please let me know.
    Thanks
    Sunny

  • Best Practice to implement row restriction level

    Hi guys,
    We need to implement a security row filter scenario in our reporting system. Following several recommendations already posted in the forum we have created a security table with the following columns
    userName  Object Id
    U1             A
    U2             B
    where our fact table is something like that
    Object Id    Fact A
    A                23
    B                4
    Additionally we have created row restriction on the universe based on the following where clause:
    UserName = @Variable('BOUSER')
    If the report only contains objects based on Fact table the restriction is never applied. This has sense as docs specify that the row restrictions are only applied if the table is actually invoked in the SQL statement (SELECT statment is supposed).
    Question is the following: Which is the best practice recommended in this situation. Create a dummy column in the security table, map into it into the universe and include the object in the query?
    Thanks
    Edited by: Alfons Gonzalez on Mar 8, 2012 5:33 PM

    Hi,
    This solution also seemed to be the most suitable for us. Problem that we have discover: when the restriction set is not applied for a given user (the advantage of using restriction set is the fact that is not always applied) the query joins the fact table with the security table withou applying any where clause based on @variable('USER'). This is not a problem if the secuity table contains a 1:1 relationship betwwen users and secured objects , but (as in our case) relathion ship is 1:n query provide "additional wrong rows".
    By the moment we have discarded the use of the restriction sets. The effect of putting a dummy column based on the security table may have undesired effects when the condition is not applied.
    I don't know if anyone has found how to workaround this matter.
    Alfons

  • Best Practice to implement Reporting Exits

    Hello,
    I want to know the best practice to implementing reporting exits.
    We have a case statement there and i_vnam.
    THen we write like
    WHen i_vnam
    Code for filling the variable values.
    The above method has a drawback that if one person is changing the program another person cannot at the same time and if one person transports it all the other changes are also transported. So if there is some code which is not ready to be used even it will be transported.
    Another option is if we creae an include for each variable eg. ZBW_'variable name'...
    And then for each variable we just have to transport the include and not the entire exit...
    Do you see any drawbacks in this method or is there any other better way?

    Hi,
    You can create your program in SE38 for your own variable & call ZXRSRU01 program in it & pass the value to a variable which will in turn pass to to variable for CASE ivnam = "".
    in this way the ZXRSRU01 will become accessible & can be called in any program.
    But it will impact all the variables.
    Its a good practice so that ZXRSRU01 is not impacted after that.
    Hope it helps.
    Thanks,
    Rashmi.

  • Best Practice regarding using and implementing the pref.txt file

    Hi All,
    I would like to start a post regarding what is Best Practice in using and implementing the pref.txt file. We have reached a stage where we are about to go live with Discoverer Viewer, and I am interested to know what others have encountered or done to with their pref.txt file and viewer look and feel..
    Have any of you been able to add additional lines into the file, please share ;-)
    Look forward to your replies.
    Lance

    Hi Lance
    Wow, what a question and the simple answer is - it depends. It depends on whether you want to do the query predictor, whether you want to increase the timeouts for users and lists of values, whether you want to have the Plus available items and Selected items panes displayed by default, and so on.
    Typically, most organizations go with the defaults with the exception that you might want to consider turning off the query predictor. That predictor is usually a pain in the neck and most companies turn it off, thus increasing query performance.
    Do you have a copy of my Discoverer 10g Handbook? If so, take a look at pages 785 to 799 where I discuss in detail all of the preferences and their impact.
    I hope this helps
    Best wishes
    Michael Armstrong-Smith
    URL: http://learndiscoverer.com
    Blog: http://learndiscoverer.blogspot.com

  • Best practice in implementation of SEM-CPM

    Is someone have  the experiance of implementing SEM-CPM using best practice. and if so, does it reduces implementation time?

    We should be able to adopt the best pratices when the software finally gets integrated into netweaver.
    Ravi Thothadri

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do i add section on page to the beginning of a document

    i have finished a pages document but i need to add a  new section at the beginning of the document how do i do this? and how do i flatten my document so everything in anchored down and not moving

  • Is there a way to stop the text shifting between mac and pc?

    I can't believe there is still no fix to the vertical text shift issue when transferring fla's between Mac and PC's. Create an fla on a Mac put some text in it, save the file and open it on a PC and see how the text has dropped. Adobe please tell me

  • (URGENT)Problem in PL/SQL package with date.

    Hi, When I am running this query "SELECT a.street_addr address, a.mailing_city_name city, d.pa_cust_name county, a.zip_cd zip, a.last_update_dt lastdate, a.status_cd status FROM CWT003_PEND_ADDR a, CWT004_ACTVITY_LOG b, CWT005_PUBLIC_AUTH c, CWT005_P

  • Error Code 39

    I have a computer with a code 39 error and need some help. The CD and DVD rom was not working in my computer when the os starts the device manager sees drives but is unable to access it. Can anyone help me?

  • How to insert date in mmm/dd/yyyy format

    hi all, im getting date from user-interface in the format of mmm/dd/yyy. when i tried to insert data in this format, insert into temp values('10-july-2000); insert into temp values('july-10-2000'); the first statement is working fine. and the second