Best practices for 40 MB limit?

I use Catalyst a lot for prototyping and adding visual elements during the development process. Now, for the first time, a designer has given me a PSD file of an entire application design. I'd like to load it into Catalyst, as advertised! But the file is 57 MB, and Catalyst is telling me it has a 40 MB limit on PSDs. I can think of a few things to do:
Break the file into two PSDs with about half the layers in each
Try to optimize the file itself somehow before importing it
Copy-and-paste from Photoshop rather than opening the file in Catalyst
Exporting to FXG from Photoshop (does Photoshop do that)?
Exploit some workaround or hidden feature that allows me to open the file as is (gimme an easter egg, please)!
Not sure what's the best thing to do. Any suggestions on best practices?

I would refactor the PSD. I would break it down it the same pattern that you will be breaking it into inside Catalyst. You also might want to look for any merging of layers that make sense to do in the PSD. The flatter the file, the better FC will run, and eventually the SWF.
Chris

Similar Messages

Best-practice for Catalog Views ? :|

Hello community,
A best practice question:
The situtation: I have several product categories (110), several items in those categories (4000) and 300 end-users. I would like to know which is the best practice for segment the catalog. I mean, some users should only see categories 10,20 & 30. Other users only category 80, etc. The problem is how can I implement this ?
My first idea is:
1. Create 110 Procurement Catalogs (1 for every prod.category). Each catalog should contain only its product category.
2. Assign in my Org Model, in a user-level all the "catalogs" that the user should access.
Do you have any idea in order to improve this ?
Saludos desde Mexico,
Diego

Hi,
Your way of doing will work, but you'll get maintenance issues (to many catalogs, and catalog link to maintain for each user).
The other way is to built your views in CCM, and assign these views to the users, either on the roles (PFCG) or on the user (SU01). The problem is that with CCM 1.0 this is limitated, cause you'll have to assign one by one the items to each view (no dynamic or mass processes), it has been enhanced in CCM 2.0.
My advice:
-Challenge your customer about views, and try to limit the number of views, with for example strategic and non strategic
-With CCM 1.0 stick to the procurement catalogs, or implement BADIs to assign items to the views (I experienced it, it works, but is quite difficult), but with a limitated number of views
Good luck.
Vadim

Best Practice for External Libraries Shared Libraries and Web Dynrpo

Two blogs have been written on sharing libraries with Web Dynpro DC, but I would
like to know the best practice for doing this.
External libraries seem to work great at compile time, but when deploying there is often an error related to the external library not being a deployed component.
Is there a workaround for this besides creating a shared J2EE library which I have been able to get working? I am not interested in something that works, but really
what are the best practice for this. What is the best way to limit the number of jars that need to be kept in a shared library/ext library. When is sharing ref service/etc a valid approach vs. hunting down the jars in the portal libraries etc and storing in an external library.

Security is mainly about mitigation rather than 100% secure, "We have unknown unknowns". The component needs to talk to SQL Server. You could continue to use http to talk to SQL Server, perhaps even get SOAP Transactions working but personally
I'd have more worries about using such a 'less trodden' path since that is exactly the areas where more security problems are discovered. I don't know about your specific design issues so there might be even more ways to mitigate the risk but in general you're
using a DMZ as a decent way to mitigate risk. I would recommend asking your security team what they'd deem acceptable.
http://pauliom.wordpress.com

Best Practice for FlexConnect Wireless roaming in MediaNet environment?

Hello!
Current Cisco best practice recommendations for enterprise MediaNet design, specify that VLANs be local to a switch / switch stack (i.e., to limit the scope of spanning-tree).
In the wireless world, this causes problems if you want users while roaming to keep real-time applications up and running. Every time they connect to a new AP on a different VLAN, then they will need to get a new IP address, which interrupts real-time apps.
So...best practice for LAN users causes real problems for wireless users.
I thought I'd post here in case there's a best practice for implementing wireless roaming in a routed environment that we might have missed so far!
We have a failover pair of FlexConnect 7510s, btw, configured for local switching for Internal users, and central switching with an anchor controller on the DMZ for Guest users.
Thanks,
Deb

Thanks for your replies, Stephen and JSnyder.
The situation here is that the original design engineer is no longer here, and the original design was not MediaNet-friendly, in that it had a very few /20 subnets bridged over entire large sites.
These several large sites (with a few hundred wireless users per site), are connected to an HQ location (where the 7510s in failover mode are installed) via 1G ethernet hand-offs (MPLS at the WAN provider). The 7510s are new, and are replacing older contollers at the HQ location.
The internal employee wireless users use resources both local to their site, as well as centralized resources. There are at least as many Guest wireless users per site as there are internal employee users, and the service to them consists of Internet traffic only. (When moved to the 7510s, their traffic will continue to be centrally switched and carried to an anchor controller in the DMZ.)
(1) So, going local mode seems impractical due to the sheer number of users whose traffic bound for their local site would be traversing the WAN twice. Too much bandwidth would be used. So, that implies the need to use Flex / HREAP mode instead.
(2) However, re-designing each site's IP environment for MediaNet would suggest to go routed to the closet. However, this breaks seamless roaming for users....
So, this conundrum is why I thought I'd post here, and see if there was some other cool / nifty solution I wasn't yet aware of.
The only other (possibly friendly to both needs) solution I'd thought of was to GRE tunnel a subnet from each closet to the collapsed Core / Disti switch at each site. Unfortunately, GRE tunnels are not supported in the rev of IOS on the present equipment, and so it isn't possible to try this idea.
Another "blue sky" idea I had (not for this customer, but possibly elsewhere in the future), is to use LAN switches such as 3850s that have WLC functionality built-in. I haven't yet worked with the WLC s/w available on those, but I was thinking it looks like they could be put into a mobility group, and L3 user roaming between them might then work. Do you happen to know if this might be a workable solution to the overall big-picture problem?
Thanks again for taking the time and trouble to reply!
Deb

Best practice for consuming web services

Hi
we are consuming web service in orchestration by "Add Generated Item".By using this option it creates 1 orch,1xsd file and some bindings.
we have different projects for schemas,maps and orchestration under our solution in visual studio.
Now i need to know that what will be the best practice for consuming web service in orchestration i mean in which project should i use "add generated item" (in orchstration project or in schemas project) coz it generates both 1 orch and 1
schema.
thanks

From a service orientation perspective you should abstract the service artifacts from the other artifacts. Otherwise it will be very difficult to update the service interface without affecting the other artifacts. For example you don't want to have to redeply
your entire application if only one field changes in the service you consume.
So I typically generate the items, remove the unnecessary stuff, and put them in a separate project.
Depending on the control you have over the services you want to consume, it would even be better to create another layer of abstraction. By that I mean create your own interface (schema) and map that one to the one the service exposes. This basically
is only necessary if you consume external services that are beyond your control. By abstracting the interface it exposes, you limit the impact of changes of that interface on the rest of your system. All changes are abstracted behind your own interface.
If you consume internal services, you can probably control the way the interface is defined. In a service oriented world all internal services expose a well known interface, based on the domain objects you have within your organisation.
Jean-Paul Smit | Didago IT Consultancy
Blog |
Twitter | LinkedIn
MCTS BizTalk 2006/2010 + Certified SOA Architect
Please indicate "Mark as Answer" if this post has answered the question.

What are the best practice for CQ5.5 configuration?

Hello,
What are the best practice for CQ5.5 configuration which handle for High availability.
Last time I had a issues on server when I was uploaded 2 GB of DAM and then after that the server is not able to start and always getting error regarding Tar Persistance.
So kindly request you to please let me know what are the best apache felix configuration.
Thanks in advance...
Regards,
Satish

Hi,
A DAM upload, regardless of the size of the assets, never should result in TarPM problems, unless you run into an OOM, which left the repository in an unclean state. So if you regularly do DAM uploads of that size, you should check the Garbage Collection logs and probably adjust the heapsize if necessary. You might want to limit the number of concurrent running workflows to keep the memory consumption a bit lower.
To your question: HA in a traditional sense you cannot achieve with a single box, even with optimized settings. In an author usecase you would need clustering.
Jörg

Best practices for logging results from Looped steps

Hi all
I would like to start a discussion to document best practices for logging results (to reports and databases) from Looped Steps
As an application example - let's say you are developing a test for one of NI's analog input or output cards and need to measure a voltage across multiple inputs or outputs.
One way to do that would be to create a sequence that switches the appropriate signals and performs a "Voltage Measurement" test in a loop.
What are your techniques for keeping track of the individual measurements so that they can be traced to the individual signal paths that are being measured?
I have used a variety of techniques such as
i )creating a custom step type that generates unique identifiers for each iteration of the loop. This required some customization to the results processing . Also the sequence developer had to include code to ensure that a unique identifier was generated for each iteration
ii) Adding an input parameter to the test function/vi, passing loop iteration to it and adding this to Additional results parameters to log.

I have attached a simple example (LV 2012 and TS 2012) that includes steps inside a loop structure as well as a looped test.
If you enable both database and report generation, you will see the following:
1) The numeric limit test in the for loop always generates the same name in the report and database which makes it difficult to determine the result of a particular iteration
2) The Max voltage test report includes the paramater as an additional result but the database does not include any differentiating information
3) The Looped Limit test generates both uniques reports and database entries - you can easily see what the result for each iteration is.
As mentioned, I am seeking to start a discussion for how others handle results for steps inside loops. The only way I have been able to accomplish a result similar to that of the Looped step (unique results and database entry for each iteration of the loop) is to modify the process model results processing.
Attachments:
test.vi ‏27 KB
Sequence File 2.seq ‏9 KB

Best Practices for FSCM Multiple systems scenario

Hi guys,
We have a scenario to implement FSCM credit, collections and dispute management solution for our landscape comprising the following:
a 4.6c system
a 4.7 system
an ECC 5 system
2 ECC6 systems
I have documented my design, but would like to double check and rob minds with colleagues regarding the following areas/questions.
Business partner replication and synchronization: what is the best practice for the initial replication of customers in each of the different systems to business partners in the FSCM system? (a) for the initial creation, and (b) for on-going synchronization of new customers and changes to existing customers?
Credit Management: what is the best practice for update of exposures from SD and FI-AR from each of the different systems? Should this be real-time for each transaction from SD and AR (synchronous) or periodic, say once a day? (assuming we can control this in the BADI)
Is there any particular point to note in dispute management?
Any other general note regarding this scenario?
Thanks in advance. Comments appreciated.

Hi,
I guess when you've the informations that the SAP can read and take some action, has to be asynchronous (from non-SAP to FSCM);
But when the credit analysis is done by non-SAP and like an 'Experian', SAP send the informations with invoices paid and not paid and this non-SAP group give a rate for this customer. All banks and big companies in the world does the same. And for this, you've the synchronous interface. This interface will updated the FSCM-CR (Credit), blocking or not the vendor, decreasing or increasing them limit amount to buy.
So, for these 1.000 sales orders, you'll have to think with PI in how to create an interface for this volume? What parameters SAP does has to check? There's an time interval to receive and send back? Will be a synchronous or asynchronous?
Contact your PI to help think in this information exchange.
Am I clear in your question?
JPA

Best practice for ASA Active/Standby failover

Hi,
I have configured a pair of Cisco ASA in Active/ Standby mode (see attached). What can be done to allow traffic to go from R1 to R2 via ASA2 when ASA1 inside or outside interface is down?
Currently this happens only when ASA1 is down (shutdown). Is there any recommended best practice for such network redundancy? Thanks in advanced!

Hi Vibhor,
I test ping from R1 to R2 and ping drop when I shutdown either inside (g1) or outside (g0) interface of the Active ASA. Below is the ASA 'show' failover' and 'show run',
ASSA1# conf t
ASSA1(config)# int g1
ASSA1(config-if)# shut
ASSA1(config-if)# show failover
Failover On
Failover unit Primary
Failover LAN Interface: FAILOVER GigabitEthernet2 (up)
Unit Poll frequency 1 seconds, holdtime 15 seconds
Interface Poll frequency 5 seconds, holdtime 25 seconds
Interface Policy 1
Monitored Interfaces 3 of 60 maximum
Version: Ours 8.4(2), Mate 8.4(2)
Last Failover at: 14:20:00 SGT Nov 18 2014
This host: Primary - Active
Active time: 7862 (sec)
Interface outside (100.100.100.1): Normal (Monitored)
Interface inside (192.168.1.1): Link Down (Monitored)
Interface mgmt (10.101.50.100): Normal (Waiting)
Other host: Secondary - Standby Ready
Active time: 0 (sec)
Interface outside (100.100.100.2): Normal (Monitored)
Interface inside (192.168.1.2): Link Down (Monitored)
Interface mgmt (0.0.0.0): Normal (Waiting)
Stateful Failover Logical Update Statistics
Link : FAILOVER GigabitEthernet2 (up)
Stateful Obj xmit xerr rcv rerr
General 1053 0 1045 0
sys cmd 1045 0 1045 0
up time 0 0 0 0
RPC services 0 0 0 0
TCP conn 0 0 0 0
UDP conn 0 0 0 0
ARP tbl 2 0 0 0
Xlate_Timeout 0 0 0 0
IPv6 ND tbl 0 0 0 0
VPN IKEv1 SA 0 0 0 0
VPN IKEv1 P2 0 0 0 0
VPN IKEv2 SA 0 0 0 0
VPN IKEv2 P2 0 0 0 0
VPN CTCP upd 0 0 0 0
VPN SDI upd 0 0 0 0
VPN DHCP upd 0 0 0 0
SIP Session 0 0 0 0
Route Session 5 0 0 0
User-Identity 1 0 0 0
Logical Update Queue Information
Cur Max Total
Recv Q: 0 9 1045
Xmit Q: 0 30 10226
ASSA1(config-if)#
ASSA1# sh run
: Saved
ASA Version 8.4(2)
hostname ASSA1
enable password 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
interface GigabitEthernet0
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 100.100.100.1 255.255.255.0 standby 100.100.100.2
ospf message-digest-key 20 md5 *****
ospf authentication message-digest
interface GigabitEthernet1
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.1.2
ospf message-digest-key 20 md5 *****
ospf authentication message-digest
interface GigabitEthernet2
description LAN/STATE Failover Interface
interface GigabitEthernet3
shutdown
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet4
nameif mgmt
security-level 0
ip address 10.101.50.100 255.255.255.0
interface GigabitEthernet5
shutdown
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
ftp mode passive
clock timezone SGT 8
access-list OUTSIDE_ACCESS_IN extended permit icmp any any
pager lines 24
logging timestamp
logging console debugging
logging monitor debugging
mtu outside 1500
mtu inside 1500
mtu mgmt 1500
failover
failover lan unit primary
failover lan interface FAILOVER GigabitEthernet2
failover link FAILOVER GigabitEthernet2
failover interface ip FAILOVER 192.168.99.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.99.2
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
asdm image disk0:/asdm-715-100.bin
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
access-group OUTSIDE_ACCESS_IN in interface outside
router ospf 10
network 100.100.100.0 255.255.255.0 area 1
network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 area 0
area 0 authentication message-digest
area 1 authentication message-digest
log-adj-changes
default-information originate always
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 100.100.100.254 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
timeout floating-conn 0:00:00
dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
user-identity default-domain LOCAL
aaa authentication ssh console LOCAL
http server enable
http 10.101.50.0 255.255.255.0 mgmt
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart warmstart
telnet timeout 5
ssh 10.101.50.0 255.255.255.0 mgmt
ssh timeout 5
console timeout 0
tls-proxy maximum-session 10000
threat-detection basic-threat
threat-detection statistics access-list
no threat-detection statistics tcp-intercept
webvpn
username cisco password 3USUcOPFUiMCO4Jk encrypted
prompt hostname context
no call-home reporting anonymous
call-home
profile CiscoTAC-1
no active
destination address http https://tools.cisco.com/its/service/oddce/services/DDCEService
destination address email [email protected]
destination transport-method http
subscribe-to-alert-group diagnostic
subscribe-to-alert-group environment
subscribe-to-alert-group inventory periodic monthly
subscribe-to-alert-group configuration periodic monthly
subscribe-to-alert-group telemetry periodic daily
crashinfo save disable
Cryptochecksum:fafd8a885033aeac12a2f682260f57e9
: end
ASSA1#

Best practices for setting up users on a small office network?

Hello,
I am setting up a small office and am wondering what the best practices/steps are to setup/manage the admin, user logins and sharing privileges for the below setup:
Users: 5 users on new iMacs (x3) and upgraded G4s (x2)
Video Editing Suite: Want to connect a new iMac and a Mac Pro, on an open login (multiple users)
All machines are to be able to connect to the network, peripherals and external hard drive. Also, I would like to setup drop boxes as well to easily share files between the computers (I was thinking of using the external harddrive for this).
Thank you,

Hi,
Thanks for your posting.
When you install AD DS in the hub or staging site, disconnect the installed domain controller, and then ship the computer to the remote site, you are disconnecting a viable domain controller from the replication topology.
For more and detail information, please refer to:
Best Practices for Adding Domain Controllers in Remote Sites
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc794962(v=ws.10).aspx
Regards.
Vivian Wang

Best Practice for Securing Web Services in the BPEL Workflow

What is the best practice for securing web services which are part of a larger service (a business process) and are defined through BPEL?
They are all deployed on the same oracle application server.
Defining agent for each?
Gateway for all?
BPEL security extension?
The top level service that is defined as business process is secure itself through OWSM and username and passwords, but what is the best practice for security establishment for each low level services?
Regards
Farbod

It doesnt matter whether the service is invoked as part of your larger process or not, if it is performing any business critical operation then it should be secured.
The idea of SOA / designing services is to have the services available so that it can be orchestrated as part of any other business process.
Today you may have secured your parent services and tomorrow you could come up with a new service which may use one of the existing lower level services.
If all the services are in one Application server you can make the configuration/development environment lot easier by securing them using the Gateway.
Typical probelm with any gateway architecture is that the service is available without any security enforcement when accessed directly.
You can enforce rules at your network layer to allow access to the App server only from Gateway.
When you have the liberty to use OWSM or any other WS-Security products, i would stay away from any extensions. Two things to consider
The next BPEL developer in your project may not be aware of Security extensions
Centralizing Security enforcement will make your development and security operations as loosely coupled and addresses scalability.
Thanks
Ram

Best practice for multi-language content in common areas

I've got a site with some text in header/footer/nav that needs to be translated between an English and Spanish site, which use the same design. My intention was to set up all the text as content to facilitate. However, if I use a standard dialog with the component's path set to a child of the current page node, I would need to re-enter the text on every page. If I use a design dialog, or a standard dialog with the component's path set absolutely, the Engilsh and Spanish sites will share the same text. If I use a standard dialog with the component's path set relatively (eg path="../../jcr:content/myPath"), the pages using the component would all need to be at the same level of the hierarchy.
It appears that the Geometrixx demo doesn't address this situation, and leaves copy in English. Is there a best practice for this scenario?

I'm finding that something to the effect of <cq:include path="<%= strCommonContentPath + "codeEntry" %>" resourceType ...
works fine for most components, but not for parsys, or a component containing a parsys. When I attempt that, I get a JS error that says "design.path is null or not an object". Is there a way around this?

Best Practice for utility in Sol Man 4.0

We have software component ST-ICO of release 150_700 with Patch level 5
We want a Template Selection for Utility industry. I checked in
the service market place and found that 'Baseline Package United
Kingdom V1.50, Template: BP_BLKU150' is available in the above software
component.
But we are not getting any templates other than 'BP_UTUS147 - Best Practices for Water Utility' in the 'SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN'
transaction.
Kindly suggest any patch needs to be applied or some configuration need to be done.
Regards
Mani

Hi Mani,
Colud u plz give me the link of "where u find the template BP_BLKU150"?
It will be helpful for me.
Thanks
Senthil

Best Practices for SRM Installation !!

Hi
can someone share the best Practices for SRM Installation ?
What is the typical timeframe to install SRM on development server and as well as on the Production server ?
Appericiate the responses
Thanks,
Arvind

Hi
I don't know whether this will help you.
See these links as well.
<b>http://help.sap.com/bp_epv170/EP_US/HTML/Portals_intro.htm
http://help.sap.com/bp_scmv150/index.htm
http://help.sap.com/bp_biv170/index.htm
http://help.sap.com/bp_crmv250/CRM_DE/index.htm</b>
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points.
Regards
- Atul

Best practices for ARM - please help!!!

Hi all,
Can you please help with any pointers / links to documents describing best practices for "who should be creating" the GRC request in below workflow of ARM in GRC 10.0??
Create GRC request -> role approver -> risk manager -> security team
options are : end user / Manager / Functional super users / security team.
End user and manager not possible- we can not train so many people. Functional team is refusing since its a lot of work. Please help me with pointers to any best practices documents.
Thanks!!!!

In this case, I recommend proposing that the department managers create GRC Access Requests. In order for the managers to comprehend the new process, you should create a separate "Role Catalog" that describes what abilities each role enables. This Role Catalog needs to be taught to the department Managers, and they need to fully understand what tcodes and abilities are inside of each role. From your workflow design, it looks like Role Owners should be brought into these workshops.
You might consider a Role Catalog that the manager could filter on and make selections from. For example, an AP manager could select "Accounts Payable" roles, and then choose from a smaller list of AP-related roles. You could map business functions or tasks to specific technical roles. The design flaw here, of course, is the way your technical roles have been designed.
The point being, GRC AC 10 is not business-user friendly, so using an intuitive "Role Catalog" really helps the managers understand which technical roles they should be selecting in GRC ARs. They can use this catalog to spit out a list of technical role names that they can then search for within the GRC Access Request.
At all costs, avoid having end-users create ARs. They usually select the wrong access, and the process then becomes very long and drawn out because the role owners or security stages need to mix and match the access after the fact. You should choose a Requestor who has the highest chance of requesting the correct access. This is usually the user's Manager, but you need to propose this solution in a way that won't scare off the manager - at the end of the day, they do NOT want to take on more work.
If you are using SAP HR, then you can attempt HR Triggers for New User Access Requests, which automatically fill out and submit the GRC AR upon a specific HR action (New Hire, or Termination). I do not recommend going down this path, however. It is very confusing, time consuming, and difficult to integrate properly.
Good luck!
-Ken

Best Practices For Household IOS's/Apple IDs

Greetings:
I've been searching support for best practices for sharing primarily apps, music and video among multple iOS's/Apple IDs. If there is a specific article please point me to it.
Here is my situation:
We currently have 3 iPads (2-kids, 1-dad) in the household and one iTunes account on a win computer. I previously had all iPads on single Apple ID/credit card and controlled the kids' downloads thru the Apple ID password that I kept secret. As the kids have grown older, I found myself constantly entering my password as the kids increased there interest in music/apps/video. I like this approach because all content was shared...I dislike because I was constantly asked to input password for all downloads.
So, I recently set up an individual account for them with the allowance feature at iTunes that allows them to download content on their own (I set restrictions on their iPads). Now I have 3 Apple IDs under one household.
My questions:
With the 3 Apple IDs, what is the best way to share apps,music, videos among myself and the kids? Is it multiple accounts on the computer and some sort of sharing?
Thanks in advance...

Hi Bonesaw1962,
We've had our staff and students run iOS updates OTA via Settings -> Software Update. In the past, we put a DNS block on Apple's update servers to prevent users from updating iOS (like last fall when iOS 7 was first released). By blocking mesu.apple com, the iPads weren't able to check for or install any iOS software updates. We waited until iOS 7.0.3 was released before we removed the block to mesu.apple.com at which point we told users if they wanted to update to iOS 7 they could do so OTA. We used our MDM to run reports periodically to see how many people updated to iOS 7 and how many stayed on iOS 6. As time went on, just about everyone updated on their own.
If you go this route (depending on the number of devices you have), you may want to take a look at Caching Server 2 to help with the network load https://www.apple.com/osx/server/features/#caching-server . From Apple's website, "When a user on your network downloads new software from Apple, a copy is automatically stored on your server. So the next time other users on your network update or download that same software, they actually access it from inside the network."
I wish there was a way for MDMs to manage iOS updates, but unfortunately Apple hasn't made this feature available to MDM providers. I've given this feedback to our Apple SE, but haven't heard if it is being considered or not. Keeping fingers crossed.
Hope this helps. Let us know what you decide on and keep us posted on the progress. Good luck!!
~Joe

Best practices for 40 MB limit?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for