Billing due list problem with customized document types

Dear Team,
We have created a new Rental contract and Rental Invoice document types by copying the standard ones (MV & FV), while trying to get the Billing due list, unable to get the Rental Invoice type, rather the system is proposing the standard Invoice type (i have already changed the Billing type to the customized one in sales document type).
Can you please let me know the pre-requisites for the billing due list.
Regards
Sreedhar

Hi,
Thank you for your response. But, i was not able to implement those oss notes as the current highest support package we are currently using is SAPKB70208, Software component - SAP-BASIS.
Kindly let me know if you have more inputs.
Regards,
Vinitha

Similar Messages

There is a requirement to have the Billing due list(VF05) with the VAT numb

Hi Experts,
There is a requirement,to have the Billing due list(VF05)-Out put with the VAT number.
Is there a scope to acheive this, so that we can have the VAT number of the Sold to Party displayed in the Billing Due list.
Regards
Montee

Hi William,
Thanks for your reply.
It solved the issue.
Regards
Montee

Problems with Custom Data Types when converting from TS 1.0 to 3.0.

I am currently involved in the process of converting a test environment from TestStand 1.0, LabVIEW 5.1, and Windows NT to TestStand 3.0, LabVIEW 7.0, and Windows XP. We use a custom Operator Interface developed in LV. Based on the entered Model and Serial number, the appropriate Test Sequence is called. We also use a custom Process Model. The steps in the Test Sequence are either LV code modules or DLLs created in C++. We have LV SubVIs and C++ API functions that allow the developers of the test steps to add data to various Custom Data Types. For example, a developer may set up a test to add a note (Step.Result.Notes[x].String) when the test fails. Step.Result.Notes is a container for an array of strings. The attempt to set a note first attempts to use SetDimensions to redimension the array, then SetValString to set the value. These notes are added to the report. On the old system, everything worked fine. A note could be added to any result. On the new system, if a note is added to say the 5th result, but results 1-4 do not have a note, the test sequence ends and the Operator Interface returns to waiting for data entry (as if no test ever happened). No report is generated. The LabVIEW libraries have been modified to solve this problem by calling SetDimensions to incrementally increase the array size by one, and populating the unused TestStand array elements with an empty array of LabVIEW strings using the SetValString call . In other words, based on the previous example, if the user wants to set a note for the 5th result, the notes for results 1-4 must first be sent an empty array of strings. The report will only display the note for Result 5 (as desired). In addition to this being cumbersome, attempting to implement the same workaround in the C++ API has been unsuccessful because even though the note arrays for unwanted notes (1-4) is initialized with nothing, it is still displayed as a note (empty) on the report. If anybody knows what is wrong and what the solution is, it will be appreciated.

Aaron,
Thanks for your reply. I will attempt to clarify. I am working with a single step. The step calls a DLL. The DLL performs many 'checks' on the UUT (e.g. Model Number Check, Serial Number Check, Calibration Constants Check, etc.). Under the Type Palette - MyTypes.ini, we have a Step Type called TEST_DLL with a container in it called Results. In the Results container are a number of things, but I will only list the important ones:
Notes (Array of Type 'Notes'; Type 'Notes' is a Custom Data Type (container, Type Definition)containing an array of strings called 'String')
-Notes are generally set when on of the checks fails, otherwise no Note is set for the check.
Val (Array of Type 'Val'; Type 'Val' is Custom Data Type (container, Type Definition) containing a Boolean called 'Boolean')
-Val indicates whether the check passed of failed
Pseudocode example:
//Model Number Check
check# = 0;
resultBOOL = ModelNumberCheck();
SetDimensions("Step.Result.Val", 0, "[0]", check#);
SetValBoolean("Step.Result.Val[check#].Boolean", 0, resultBOOL);
if(resultBOOL == FAIL)
Note# = 0;
SetDimensions("Step.Result.Notes", 0, "[0]", check#);
SetDimensions(Step.Result.Notes[check#].String, 0, "[0]", Note#);
SetValString("Step.Result.Notes[check#].String[Note#]", 0, "Model Number Check failed");
Note# = 1;
SetDimensions(Step.Result.Notes[check#].String, 0, "[0]", Note#);
SetValString("Step.Result.Notes[check#].String[Note#]", 0, "Model Number = 1234");
//Serial Number Check
check# = 1;
resultBOOL = SerialNumberCheck();
SetDimensions("Step.Result.Val", 0, "[0]", check#);
SetValBoolean("Step.Result.Val[check#].Boolean", 0, resultBOOL);
if(resultBOOL == FAIL)
Note# = 0;
SetDimensions("Step.Result.Notes", 0, "[0]", check#);
SetDimensions(Step.Result.Notes[check#].String, 0, "[0]", Note#);
SetValString("Step.Result.Notes[check#].String[Note#]", 0, "Serial Number does not match expected");
More Checks
As you can see above, the "Step.Result.Val" array is redimensioned for every check. The "Step.Result.Notes" array is only redimensioned when a note needs to be added for a failing check. If the entire step executes and no check adds a note, the sequence is fine. If every check fails and therefore every check adds a note, the sequence is fine. However, if there are any gaps (e.g. check 0 adds a note, check 1 does not add a note, and check 2 tries to add a note), the sequence will stop. If I add blank notes for every check that would otherwise not have a note, the sequence completes, but the report shows the blank note.
Also, the exact code that is causing these problems runs fine on our old systems (TestStand 1.0). I hope that I clarified the problem and thanks again for the help.

Problem with customized info type creation

hi
When i am creating customized info type using T-code PM01, i get error message like "package in non original system only modifiable with organizer tools".
The above message is coming whenever save the infotype in either customized package or local package.
As per my observation when i save the infotype, it default takes SAP package So i need to change that package.So how can i change the package in T-code PM01.
Please tell me the solution to overcome the error.
Thanks,
Ali

Hi,
Since infotype attribute in table T582A is clent specific, so you should maintain the entries in the target client.
Create the table entry of your infotype in the other client in view V_T582A (infotype attribute) or via t-code PM01 and click button 'infotype characteristics. Also you can transport CR from client to client via t-code SCC1 as well.
Hope helps,
Chen Jian

Add sales document number in a Billing due list(VF05)

Hi Experts,
Like the thread There is a requirement to have the Billing due list(VF05) with the VAT numb
There is a requirement,to have the Billing due list(VF05)-Out put with the sales document number VBAK-VBELN and customer purchase order number VBKD-BSTKD.
I want to apply the OSS note 398575:
Replace dummy in the structure VKDFIZ field with VBELN and BSTKD .
in Table T180A , add two new data record:
                              TBNAM = 'VKDFIF'
                              FDNAM = 'BSTKD'
                              ZUART = 'D'
But my question is : for the record
                              TBNAM = VKDFIF
                              FDNAM = 'VBELN'
                              ZUART = 'D'
The fileds VBELN already exist in the structure VKDFIF and don't designate the sales document number.
What can I do to designate the sales document number added in the structure VKDFIZ ????
Regards
Marie-Madeleine

Hi
The Tcode VF05 is not billing duelist but it is the list of billing documents. For including the fields you want, please go through the OSS note 485928

Billing Due List Date

Hi,
I only want the Billing Due List to run for documents with a 'Billing Doc Created On' date <= today's date. I can type the entry in manually and it works perfectly, but is it possible to have a variant for the Billing Due List which will always place the current date into the 'Billing Doc Created On' To-Date? This variant would then be used in the scheduled job.
Thanks,
Aidan.

Hi Aidan
I think that if you hit the 'Save' button to create a selection variant, you should be able to use a Selection Variable to fill the date.
If you choose type 'D - Dynamic date calculation' then the first entry is 'Current date'.
You shouldn't need to create a TVARV variable.
Cheers
Dom

Billing Due List shows third party sales orders that have no SGR

Hello,
I've run into an issue where the billing due list (VF04) shows sales documents that have not gone through statistical goods receipt. In our normal flow we create a sales order, which automatically creates a purchase requisition (PR). We create a purchase order (PO) from the PR and when we generate a shipping notification (ASN) we also do a statistical goods receipt, which kicks off billing.
Normally items show up in the billing due list based on the billing type of the sales order item category. In this case that indicator is B - relevant for order-related billing on the basis of the order quantity. My understanding is that it should not show up in the billing due list until goods receipt, which is not happening for us. We're seeing sales orders based on non-SGR'd PO's in the billing due list.
Also, in sales to billing copy control (vtfa) the billing quantity indicator is E - Goods receipt less invoiced quantity.
Any ideas? Have I provided enough info? Thanks in advance!

Kapil,
Thank you very much! However, a setting of 'F' only seems to show line items in the Billing Due List after I create a vendor invoice. We are not using vendor invoices for our process and I want items to show up in the Billing Due List after the GRN. Are you saying that you think items should show up in the Billing Due List after the GRN? I know SAP doco kind hints to that, but I did try a setting of 'F' and it does not work; the items only show up after I create a vendor invoice.
Any other info or guidance is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark

Problem with Billing due list, relating to Returns Credits

Hi
I have a query/ problem with the billing due list
I cannot seem to be able to create billing documents via VF04 for Returns credits, only via VF01
I have changed Billing relevance of Item category REN to be A - Delivery related,
As we previously had problems with incorrect qty being billed IF returned delivery quantity was different to Returns order quantity - this resolved the problem but I now cannot create billing via billing due list
Messsage appears ' delivery type LR cannot be invoiced with billing type F2'
If i enter billing type RE then the document is not gettting picked up at all
when Billing relevance of item category was B, order related - all seemed to be working ok
I have copy controls set up from LR to RE with item category REN, with pricing type G
Please advise how i can get the Returns to appear in the billing due list
many thanks for your help
Tony

Hi,
In copy controll VTFL
LR to F2 at item level
REN >>> Deatila >>> Put billing quantity as - D delivery related
Kapil

Problem with TCode VF04, Billing Due List

Hi,
In billing due list (Transaction VF04) we find that when the sales orders are displayed on execution of this transaction and we select all the sales orders and click on collective billing button, very few of them are included in the proforma invoice. Earlier all of those selected used to become part of proforma invoice.
I have tried debugging after selecting all the sales order and clicking on the collective billing button (all of which is standard SAP code), but cannot understand
why some of the sales order are included in the proforma invoice and why some are not included.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Mick

Thanks Ganesh. All are order type ZO05. These are document sales orders (DSO). This is a cutomised type of sales order.
However this is the 1st time we have got such a issue when we select all the sales orders and only few of them selectively become part of a proforma invoice.
Your help would be greatly appreciated.

Documents with billingblocks should not appear in billing due list

Dear all
we have a requirement that in VF04 when i select both delivery related and no docs with billing block it is still showing the documents which have billing block in the sales order header .
pls let me know is there any thing i can do to avoid the delievry documents which have billing block in header of sales document doesnt appear in the billing due list.
regards
baranidharan

Hi Baranidharan,
As per the standard For order related billing
The billing block at header level is taken into account in the billing due list, the billing block at item level is not relevant
Your requirement is
Avoid the delievry documents which have billing block in header of sales document doesnt appear in the billing due list.
So you copy the standard programe then do the changes as per your requirement with the help of ABAPer.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Billing due list gettnig updated with unwanted Invoice type

Hi SAP Guys,
Using VF04, i get a Billing due list. The issue is - I don't want a particular invoice type to be seen in the Billing due list though that invoice type exists and has different purpose.
Please, advise.

hi,
pl do it this way
1) go to VF04 t.code
2)enter the selection criteria as required to carry out the billing process.
3) then the second field in the VF04 selection screen, you have billing type field > on the right side you have an arrow > clikc to open it > on the top you will find two green light and two red lights > here you have options to select or exclude
a) a range of billing doc types
b) single values.
4) now go the red light single values and give the billing type which you dont want to invoice.
5) click the execute button there.
6) Now all the screen selection is done
7)Now click the save button > it will ask do you want to maintain billing due list > click yes > give a name and save it.
8) now you have created a varaint for VF04.
9) Execute the due list.
regards
sadhu kishore

Document still appears on Billing Due List after creation of Credit Memo

Hello everyone!
I would like to seek your help in knowing the reason why documents in the Billing Due List dated on or before June 30, 2008 with billing type ZRJF would require three creations of Credit Memo before the delivery returns status will change from "being processed" to "completed." Please note that there was a configuration made on June 31, 2008 in the copy control of ZREF to ZRBO wherein the pos./neg. quantity of item cat ZRBO was changed from to (+).
Moreover, what should I do with the documents in VF04 dated on or before June 30, 2008 that still appears after one creation of credit memo?
Thanks in advance. Have a great day to all!

Hi Ravi,
Thanks for your prompt response. I checked the delivery return status and it is still "being processed" eventhough I have already created a credit memo for all the returned goods.
I actually observe this in my documents dated on or before June 31, 2008. At that time, the copy control pos./neg. quantity was set to negative (-). Is this the reason why documents still appear in the billing due list? If so, what should I with these documents so it will no longer appear in the Billing Due List?
Thank you very much!

Sales document is deleted still billing plans are in billing due list

Hello,
Sales document is deleted which have billing plans, But still billing plans are showing in billing due list for billing. Please let me know how to delete the entries in billing due list.
Thanks and Regards
Vikram.M

Run program RVV05IVB in SA38 to correct the billing index. Before running the program read OSS Note 128947 - Correction of SD document indexes with RVV05IVB on the checks to be done before running the program.
Regards,

Billing due List - Net amount not showing for bill type F2

Hi
Could someone please advise me why the net value is not showing on the billing due list for F2 billing types ?
It is showing for L2, G2 and RE billing types
Many thanks for your help and advise
Tony

Hi
KIndly check the oss note 445763 and the report RVDELSTA
if the above is not working then kindly use the below logic with the help of ABAPer to update the same
TABLES: VBFA.
SELECT SINGLE * from vbfa where VBTYP_N = ' ' and vbelv = ' '.
if sy-subrc = 0.
UPDATE vbfa SET PLMIN = ' ' where vbelv = ' ' and vbtyp_n = ''.
endif.
Regards
Damu

Delivery document in Billing due list even after complete deivery

Hi
I am facing a situation where in a delivery document still appears in Billing due list VF04 even after completely invoiced.
The delivery documents are run in the background.
Has anyone faced such a scenrio before ?
Thanks
Anil
Edited by: Kumar Anil on Apr 27, 2011 5:31 PM

Hi Lakshmipati
It is blank "not relevant for completion".Not sure hw it works well with other documents.the same item cat is assigned to those too.
Sivaram, i will update once i check it
Edited by: Kumar Anil on Apr 28, 2011 6:55 PM

Billing due list problem with customized document types

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for