Block Property - Update

Hi,
I have a problem with forms dev. 6.0 block property. I have only one master block and no details blocks. And I set want user can update the block but not insert. So i set the properties update and insert, true-false properly. But when i want to update a column in the block it wont let me to update. I check the status of the both properties and there was no change. but still cant solve it. Can u help me please. Thanks.

i've done it already. I've checked the insert and update properties and theres no change of any property but it still dont let me to update. I looked up to the block triggers and item triggers that any changing procedure but i found nothing.

Similar Messages

What property/preference sets block property "Update changed columns only"

Hi, we are wondering how Designer (latest version 10.1.2.4) desides when it generates a form with block property "Update changed columns only" set to Yes.
Under some cricumstances this property is No in the generated .fmb
We checked the object library, but the .olb has this property set to No, so Designer overrules it.
Our goal is to generate all blocks with the "Update changed columsn only" set to No, because we ran in a forms bug that it can't handle Insert statements on blocks with this property set to Yes (ORA-01036). This bug only occurs in the latest forms version 10.1.2.3
Hope anyone can help to force this property to be No when we want to achieve 100% generation from Designer.
Kind Regards
Auke Quist
Edited by: aukequist on Oct 13, 2008 8:49 PM

I think that's not possible in designer. You could define a block with this property set in the template form or in the object library. The use this block use the template/library object property in designer.
Regards Erik

Item property does not overrides block property ?

I have CURRENT RECORD VISUAL ATTRIBUTE set to SOMETHING for block A. i also have CURRENT RECORD VISUAL ATTRIBUTE for item AA in block A ( A.AA) . but when i run form, it looks like item AA's CURRENT RECORD VISUAL ATTRIBUTE is not in effect ?
usually item's property should override block property. but it'snot happening here.. can anyone figure out??

Set_Item_Instance_Property is a more specific control, so Set_Item_Property logically should not change it.
Create two package variables defined in a package specification in the form, trig_item and trig_record.
Change your WBP trigger:
Set_Item_Instance_Property(Pkg1.trig_item,Pkg1.trig_record, VISUAL_ATTRIBUTE,'');
Pkg1.trig_item := :System.trigger_item;
Pkg1.trig_record := :system.trigger_record;
Set_Item_Instance_Property(Pkg1.trig_item,Pkg1.trig_record, VISUAL_ATTRIBUTE,'SET');
Actually, a When-New-Item-Instance trigger might be better than the WBP trigger, so the same action would occur no matter how the cursor is moved around your form (Using Enter or Tab, or shift-Tab, or scrolling).

Item property : Update allowed: No

I have created a tabular form. Due to the fact that it is not possible to record the primary key manually, i have create a fake primary key on field 'ID'. The field 'StatusID' has now a unique constraint in the database. Also the foreign keys refer to the field 'StatusID'.
I want to prevent updating the field 'StatusID'. In Oracle Forms this was very easy.
You can set the item property Update allowed : NO.
But how can I implement this in an APEX tabular form?
Regards,
Johan Brouwer

Leo,
It's a tabular form. The field StatusID can be recorded manual.
When a StatusID has been created, it's not allowed to change it anymore.
If you use "display as text, save state", you are also not able to insert the data in that field.
So if a record has been created, then it's not allowed to change the field anymore.
In oracle forms, this was very easy. You could set the insert_allowed property on YES and the update_allowed property on NO. I'll want to built the same functionality in the tabular form.
Regards,
Johan

Block Property (Query Data Source Type)

Hello Friends
I am using Forms 6i.oracle 9i.
in the Block Property Pallete under Query Data Source Type there
are 4 Type is mentioned.i have used Table,From Clause Query but yet to use Transactional Trigger and Procedure.How to use this two and it will be very kind enough if u give any example about these twos.
Regards

There's a whole bunch of explanation about this subject in the online help of Forms. Just select the Query Data Source Type property and press F1. The initial explanation is very limited but there are a number of useful links under "Related topics"

PLSQL Block for Update Statement

Oracle : 10.2.0.5
update TEST.USER_PROFILEs c
set c.uswin = (
select a.uswin from TEST.GBL_USER_PROFILE a, test.user_profiles b
where b.five_and_two=a.uswin
where c.five_and_two in ( select e.uswin from TEST.GBL_USER_PROFILE e, test.user_profiles f
where f.five_and_two=e.uswin )
above query is throwing
ORA-01427: single-row subquery returns more than one row that's because of my in clause.
Looks like I have to write a block to update my user_profile table from GBL_USER_PROFILE. Any suggestiion ??

It is completely unclear what are you trying to do, but looks like:
update TEST.USER_PROFILEs c
   set c.uswin = (
                   select a.uswin
                     from TEST.GBL_USER_PROFILE a
                     where c.five_and_two=a.uswin
where c.five_and_two in (
                           select uswin
                             from TEST.GBL_USER_PROFILE
/SY.

I want to block the Update plugins pop up, I have a PPC I can't update!

I want to block the Update plugins pop up. I have a G5 MAC running Power PC processors. The newer versions of Flash and Java are for Intel processors. I can not utilize those newer updates. So if I can't have Fire Fox stop popping up that annoying reminder then, I will be forced to uninstall Fire Fox and use Safari.

You can set the <b>plugins.update.url</b> pref to an empty string and set the <b>plugins.hide_infobar_for_outdated_plugin</b> pref to true on the about:config page.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/about:config

How to block specific updates?

Let's say you have a particular bad update that slipped through your software update piloting process and now you need to temporarily - or permanently - block this update. What's the best way to accomplish this?
One possible answer is removing the offending software update from all software update groups (edit membership) and deleting its content from all deployment packages - but this doesn't necessarily tell clients not to apply the update: clients that have already
determined the update is applicable and downloaded content will still apply it, depending on timing.
Is there actually a way to directly tell clients 'do not apply <this> update'?
born to learn!

No, there's no way to block an update to my knowledge.
Removing it from the update groups is sufficient though to prevent it from being installing unless you are doing this at the very last minute. Once clients update their polices (which by default happens every 60 minutes) they will see that the update
no longer has a deadline or is even deployed and so won't install it.
Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com | @jasonsandys

Query_data_source_name block property

Hi all.
I want to create a block non-base table in which I want to change dynamically the source of the block. I have thougth to set at runtime the block property query_data_source_name and to pass it a different select at a different value of a parameter.
My questions are:
1) How is the use of this property??? I have seen it on the on line help but it's not clear.
2) Is there another way to obtain the same result??
I'm on devsuite10g.
Thanks in advance for the collaboration.
Fabrizio

I have tried to clear the block; but the result is the same.
Here is my code:
DECLARE
condizione varchar2(5000) := null;
BEGIN
     condizione := '(select '||:parameter.campo1||', count('||:parameter.campo1||') from '||:parameter.imposta_ricerca||' group by '||:parameter.campo1||')';
     go_block('sag_cong_congiunturali');
     clear_block;
     set_block_property('sag_cong_congiunturali_raggr',query_data_source_name,condizione);
     go_block('sag_cong_congiunturali_raggr');
     execute_query;
END;
When I'm in runtime the select is this:
(select CODICE, count(CODICE) from SAG_CONG_CONGIUNTURALI group by CODICE)
I don't understand where is the error...
Fabrizio

No more anti-spam filter or block list updates?

Our Exchange Server 2007 (Enterprise) was receiving these updates rather frequently until February 2nd. There was a connection error but then nothing. I just looked in the Microsoft update catalog and the server
is has the latest updates (compared against the Exchange console).
What gives? Did support stop? Or, when will the spam and block list updates resume? Our spam has increased dramatically since that date... I've been searching a lot but everything I find only talks about having
that service enabled, which it is.
TIA
Here are the latest versions I have installed:
Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Enterprise Block List Updates v3.3.14529.029 (2/2/2015)
Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 Enterprise Anti-spam Filter Updates v3.3.14528.472 (1/29/2015)

Thank you for trying to help and offering that reply. I did try that originally. I've disabled and re-enabled both through the command line and through the management console. Everything shows that the updates
are off/on (as I make the change), indicating all the commands are working as they should.
Unfortunately, it seems there just aren't any updates. It doesn't make any sense. When I go to the link below, I don't see anything there beyond February
1st. And, I have all the updates through then (on the block/spam side) and I can receive manually and automatically all the updates for SBS 2008 in general since. It's just this one product feature not working/updating...
Is anybody getting updates for Exchange 2007 Enterprise?
Here's the link that's not showing any updates since February 1st, 2015:
http://catalog.update.microsoft.com/v7/site/Rss.aspx?q=exchange+server+2007+anti-spam&lang=en

WINXP SP2 block Automatic Update

I was hoping anybody has an idea. I want to block auto update . Microsoft
has a blocker tool which run from a command line. The problem is it requires
a machine name and the variable don't wark in Zenworks. Also it is just a
registry entry, so I tried to have the entry loaded but that seems to fail
also. Any ideas.

Thomas,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Do a search of our knowledgebase at http://support.novell.com/search/kb_index.jsp
- Check all of the other support tools and options available at http://support.novell.com in both the "free product support" and "paid product support" drop down boxes.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses: http://support.novell.com/forums/faq_general.html
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/

Change block property to insert mode

Can i change the status of block property to insert mode while run time.
Please help me.
Vikas

Yes, see the Set_Block_Property() built-in in the online help.
Francois

Dunning block getting updated wringly in invoice

hi
i have changed sales order and updated dunning block as "FREED FROM DUNNIN". when i created invoice and check for dunning block its updated as "A Manual block reason A,
may i know how to resolve this issue.

Hello,
field VBRK-MANSP is automaticaly filled with 'A' if the billing document is relevant for Invoice list.
A billing document is relevant for Invoice list if the Payer has field KNVV-PERRL filled, and the billing type has the field TVFK-FKART_RL filled.
See the SAP note [1078149|https://bosap-support.wdf.sap.corp/sap/support/notes/1078149].
Best regards,
Ivano.

Multi-table data block with update

My data block is set up by joining 3 tables. Only 1 table is
set up as updatable. The columns from the other 2 tables are
set in property palette as not updatable. But when I try to
update the data block row, I get: FRM-40501 ORACLE error:
unable to reserve record for update or delete.
I have tried using an updatable view in the data block and even
wrote an INSTEAD TRIGGER for the update but I receive the same
message.
I appreciate your help.
Thanks.

you can try on-update trigger on block level to handle this
problem.

Firefox 34.0.5 says Adobe Flash plugin is blocked, but update check reports my Flash plugin (ver. 16.0.0.235) is current. How to fix???

About 1 month ago, I updated Flash and Firefox to most current versions. Firefox 34.0.5, running on WinXP, SP3, shows Adobe Flash plugin as ver. 16.0.0.235, but this is now being blocked again. No other versions of Flash are evident. When I choose option on Flash screen to check plugins are up to date, Firefox reports Flash plugin is up to date.
This program behaviour is wrong and should be fixed. Checking at Adobe, current Flash is 16.0.0.305.
Who or what is broken here? Is Firefox broken, and not reporting correctly that more current Flash plugin is available?
I do not appear to have previous versions of Flash installed on system. This combo of software was working correctly for a while, and then became broken, without a proper path to allow users to resolve it. If Firefox is rigged to "Block" a plugin, then it *MUST* be configured to easily and **CORRECTLY** allow that plugin to be updated. Using most current software, my clicking on the "Check for updates" feature reports that Adobe Flash is most current version. Arrrrgh!!
I am now back to "diagnose and fix broken Firefox+Flash" exercise, which I just went thru.
Best solution here would be to allow user to easily override the "blocking" mechanism. This would assist users who only use Flash video access on trusted sites.
If there is an obvious solution to this current Flash "BLocking" goofery, please inform. Otherwise, if and when I resolve this, I will post a reply to my own question here, indicating what I did to fix this, as it appears to be affecting other Firefox+Flash users, without a clear solution being posted.

Adobe issued 3 new Flash 16 versions in January alone, then another new one - .305 - in February, ''along with one in early December. Five new versions in 2 months time''. So with updating Flash "about 1 month ago", you are probably 2 or 3 versions behind the latest Flash 16 version.
Note that Adobe has its own internal updater, which by default is set to check for an update ''(only)'' once a month. Adobe does their own updates for their software, Firefox just tells you when your version is on the blocklist due to known security issues with the version you have installed. It is up to you to do a manual update between the monthly update check that Flash does for your installation.
The "solution" is for Adobe to fix their stuff. Like maybe an updater that checks for updates more frequently, and not hide their updater user preferences where users don't know where they are and be able to set it for more a frequent update check cycle. ''[Firefox "checks" every time Firefox is launched, as does Chrome]''. Or fix the code in Flash that leads to it being so exploitable, and not have to do 5 separate security fixes in as little as a 2 month time span. ''Flash went almost 2 years prior to Dec 2014 without Mozilla needing to blocklist it, and when Mozilla did first blocklist it in Dec it was / is a soft-block where the user can still use it by using Allow per Flash presentation.''
My advice is to grab the Extended Support Release - Flash Player 13.0.0.269 from here - https://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html - over 3/4 down that page. IMO the best version for WinXP users, as the later versions have features for Vista and later versions of Windows - won't work on WinXP or may cause problems on WinXP.

Block Property - Update

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for