BOBJ DEV and BOBJ Q.A environments are syncing :(

HI experts,
I am facing an issue i have some folders and repors in bobj dev .but when i log in to bobj q.a i can see the same reports and folder .i did not export them and they are not pointing to same database .if i delete a folder in dev i can see its deleted in q.a ..help me how to resolve
i also created a user in dev and i was not able to login with that user in q.a so it shows database is not same but how come reports and folder are in sync ????????
please help me

Hi,
Did you migrate the whole CMS database from DEV to QA (using database copy or Copy Datasource method)? If yes, you need to delete and recreate your server and cluster entries as copying the datasource wouldn't change the metadata in the CMS database and your target system will be pointing to the source host only.

Similar Messages

Dev and Production BW systems not in sync.

Hello All,
We have been using two BW systems for our implementation project. One is the development and second one is production BW system. I observed that few BW objects have different configuration (like update rules, user exits, queries , web templatesetc) in the production compared to the development system. Now my requirement is to find out the all the BW objects in the production that having different status than development. So that I can make corresponding changes in the development system as well in order to sync dev and production systems.
1. Is there any tool/transaction is available by which I can retrieve the list of the BW objects and may be delta changes between dev and prd systems.
2. Or any standard process exists to sync the both versions.
Any help to this will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Harsh.

Hi Harsh,
For the Transfer rules/update rules you can do a remote compare of the Generated Program which would give you an idea whether they are in sync or not. Likewise you can do remote compare of the User exit fn module.
Bye
Dinesh

Just updated iphone 4 and now no tv shows are syncing

I updated my iphone and now no tv shows are showing on the iphone. They are showing in itunes, but here is the weird part, when Sync TV shows is DE-SELECTED it shows a certain amount of blue for audio, purple for video, same for photos, apps and other and shows 5.60 GB free.
Then when I SELECT TV Shows there are roughly 10-12 TV shows that it should include, it then shows a very small amount of blue Audio, NO purple for video, photos, apps and other remain the same AND shows 8.10 GB Free..... Shouldn't this have DECREASED since I added.... Logically doesn't make any sense. Any guidance??

try downloading a new free app and run it.
Sounds crazy, but this has helped many

What do you do when you try and sync your phone and it says you are synced with another computer and u are not?

I am having trouble syncing ringtones and movies

If it says you are synced with another computer, you are synced with another computer. The only alternative is you have wiped and reloaded the computer that you normally sync with, essentially making it a new computer.
Use the search function, this question is asked on a daily basis.

Are web/cloud-based dev and apps dist the future for LV?

The direction of software companies such as Microsoft and Adobe is that they are no longer distributing media for standalone PCs. (we all know that if we didn't need to dist the hefty LV RTE life would be a bit easier)
You no longer purchase specific versions of their software instead you subcribe and login to have access to the latest versions from any location.
Examples are Office 365 and Adobe Creative Cloud. Presumably the subscription arrangement for them is more profitable.
Will this (a) be the future for LV development environment; and (b) will this make it possible for developers to adopt similar strategies for distributing their own apps?
Currently is this something that the webservices features of LV can deal with to some degree? I understand this is limited to a small number of concurrent users at a time? I also understand that web-based are not exactly the same as cloud-based applications.
Is this something NI is not moving toward since LV has traditionally been tied to fixed hardware (i.e. data acquisition) applications?
Anyway, I'd be interested in hearing people's opinions..

I can't speak for NI's future plans. But I don't think a move like this would benefit much of the LabVIEW community. I'm sure there are some that would fine a clound or web based distribution system convinient but for me many of the system I install LabVIEW, TestStand, DAQmx, XNET, and many other NI tools are offline perminently. These computers don't get future Windows updates, or NI updates unless I make an effort to put them on the network, or bring over DVDs and external drives with updates on them.
So as for distributing NI applications I don't think this is a good move. They already have a subscription based approach with things like the VLA, Enterprise solutions, and SSP. Having the user go NI.com and download the tools you want has worked, and moving to a cloud application won't really work because NI users are quite diverse. Office 365 works because if you use office, you use the same office. But with LabVIEW there are so many 3rd party tools and libraries that the LabVIEW you use can be very different from the one I use.
As for distributing your own built applications I think this would be neat, but again not right for me.
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines - Hooovahh - LabVIEW Overlord
If 10 out of 10 experts in any field say something is bad, you should probably take their opinion seriously.

OLAP Universe Sturcture in Production not same as Dev and QA

We have created a OLAP Univese from a SAP BEX Query .The BEX Qeury is identical in structure and Result in Dev(migrated to QA and Production)
The BOBJ Olap Universe creates a Main Class ( FROM SAP DIMENSION -Three of them ) and Sub Class ( Characterstic -13 of them ) in the Dev and QA, however the Production Universe creates a flat stucture of the Class from the Characteristics ( universe identify all the objects and new objects)
So my Webi reports in DEV and Qa do not work in Production, as it sa
We are not able to identifyt why this is happening, or what else we can check that is causing a class subclass sturcute in DEV and Qa and FLAT Class structure in Production.

Hi,
First check BEx query is same in the prod environment as dev and QA.
Thanks,
Amit

Dev and Prod Environment Sync.

Hello Experts,
I would like to ask for your kind help in the following matter: How to resynch the dev and production environments.
For some (inextricable) reason, the production and development servers are out of sync. Mainly the SLD content is in different versions. The production one is older. Oh and there is no QA environment.
Besides that the business systems were created manually in each server and have inconsistencies. No SLD information was transported between them, only the repository and some directory information. Other directory information was created in the production environment directly. And I am affraid some development took place in production server directly too.
So I have been asked to produce a plan to get all this mess into shape. So far at a macro level I have these tasks planned:
10.- Backup prod and dev servers.
20.- Load latest CIM model and CR content on both servers (and see what happens).
30.- Connect the SAP systems as SLD data sources to prod SLD.
40.- Redo configuration in prod to point to automatically created business systems (and retest).
50.- Cleanup of manually created business systems the prod environment.
60.- Config the prod SLD as data source for dev SLD.
70.- Redo configuration in dev server to make it match prod SLD.
80.- Cleanup of manually created business systems the dev environment.
90.- Create in the dev server the repository objects that were directly created in prod.
100.- Test everything for consistency.
Please help me improve the task list/order.
-Sam.

Hi Sam
You are planning a lot of activity on a production environment. Two coments:
1. When you have your dev SLD configured as you require, with CIM, PI Content & Business Systems updated etc .. perhaps you should do a level of regression testing on this environment before embarking on changing the Live env.
2. Once you are happy that the Dev env It is possible to Export and import manually the SLD content from the Dev to the Live to align both systems, refer to link:
https://websmp104.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000315022005E.PDF
This is available through the Export Link in Administration page.
Thanks
Damien

Multiple connections to dev and prod

Hi All,
I trying to connect multiple environments (Dev and Prod) from shared connections in Smartview.
When I right click on the existing planning I couldn't see anything (there were suggestions from other posts that by right clicking you will get an option to add new server).
Also I have differetn URL's for dev and Prod.

I think from 11.1.2.2 onwards the ability to add servers in Shared Connection is removed and an enhancement is filed to have that ability.
You can use private connection to connect to different instances
http://DEV:19000/aps/APS for Essbase
http://DEV:19000/HyperionPlanning/SmartView HyperionPlanning
If you are on 11.1.2.3 you can create an XML file and use that as your Shared Connection
Essbase Labs: Smart View News
Regards
Celvin
http://www.orahyplabs.com

Org.structure differs on dev and production

Hi,
I'm developing a workflow and in one of the steps (activity step), I assign agent using organizational structure (position from HR). The problem is, that the org.structure differs on dev system and on production system. Mainly the IDs of position posts differ. How to solve this? Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Tomas

>
Tomas Linhart wrote:
> thanks for answer, I guess that's the best way of handling such situation. I'm going to creat custom table holding position used in workflow mapped to real position ID from org.structure. Or more generally, holding WF post mapped to org.structure type (position, job, ...) with corresponding ID in org.
I don't see why you need a custom table?
The org issues aside, all that is needed is to assign your org unit to the task. Then leave the agent assignment blank in your WF. Job done.
The other option is to create a dummy rule, which you thought was to be avoided. I don't agree, it takes 5 minutes, less effort than a table, less non-standard stuff ==> less explaining to people how to maintain & easier to troubleshoot.
Edit: Forgot to answer your other question
> I'm not sure if you consider org. replication the same as transport of org. I was thinking of transport myself, just didn't know the way how to. I've found transaction RE_RHMOVE30 (also acessible from customizing), that should do that, but am not sure, if that's the right one and/or what options to select when transporting. Also, I'm not sure if this would ensure the position/job IDs are the same on both systems.
Replication would be carried out via transports. The RHMOVE* reports can also be used, or you could even set up an ALE connection between DEV and PRD. However I still would not recommend it. The development system is where you would need to create test users and/or org units. The other alternative is to have a master data client. All of these are a great deal of work which only make sense in certain types of environments - certainly not for the sake of a workflow.
Edited by: Mike Pokraka on Sep 27, 2009 9:52 PM

The iPod "bobj's iPod" cannot be synced. The required file cannot be found.

Windows XPHome, iPod Touch 4G (now) version 4.3.4. Attempted to update to 4.3.4 last night. Files downloaded, but got message that it could not connect to server. A few hours later I tried again, this time it started the update, but when it got to "Installing new hardware, iPod Touch (Recovery Mode)" it couldn't seem to find the drivers, so the iPod was stuck on the cable/iTunes screen. This AM, I did a complete uninstall/reinstall of iTunes, Quictkime, etc. This freed up my iTunes to restore my iPod. I then did a Restore from Backup. Everything worked fine EXCEPT at the end I got the message: The iPod “bobj’s iPod” cannot be synced. The required file cannot be found. It also seems that the onlything that didn't restore were the photos. Subsequent attempts at syncing produced the same error message. My photo cache is in the same location as before and it's location is correct in iTunes. I even reselected and applied it.
What are the next steps to solve this problem.

Thanks. Worked perfectly. Had to turn the photo sync back on and select the folders, but all that took was a few clicks. It's been a harrowing day sinced the failed update, but everything seems back to normal now.

Overwriting Dev and Stage DB's with Production creates Missing Dependencies

When I refresh my Dev and Stage environments by restoring the DBs with those from Production, I get numerous Missing Dependency errors.
We have lots of custom WSPs, and I think that the cause is that the production WSPs are overwriting those in the other environments without first retracting/deleting them.
Is there a way to restore without creating these errors?
Thanks,
Scott

if the custom WSP is deployed as a sandbox solution, then it'll be included in the content database refresh.
the missing dependency stuff is all about finding GUIDs that SharePoint can't resolve... whether that's a web part or a feature.
The retraction/deletion process doesn't actually clean up contents in the content database (web parts in use, etc)... it just handles the synchronous deployment of the feature between servers. So regardless of how a custom WSP is deployed/updated/etc, missing
dependencies can happen.
The question you need to address, is tracking down the missing dependencies, and determining whether they are still in use in PROD (perhaps the component was removed, but the web part still exists on a page), and if so making sure it's also available in
DEV/TEST... assuming it's necessary... if a web part isn't available in DEV/TEST, maybe it doesn't matter, and maybe the missing dependency isn't an issue.
Scott Brickey
MCTS, MCPD, MCITP
www.sbrickey.com
Strategic Data Systems - for all your SharePoint needs

Can a single Sun IDM gateway agent be used for both Dev and QA machine

We have three different machines - one for IDM QA, one for IDM DEV and one remote machine where Sun IDM gateway is installed.
If we run the Dev and QA gateway on the same server, we won't be able to test any updates in an isolated environment before rolling out to QA..right?
Is it possible to have a Sun IDM gateway agent instance on the same remote machine? or do we have to install gateway separately on DEV and QA? Any ideas??

Hello Manidhar,
You have three different machines -
QA,DEV and IDM Remote gateway.
If we run the Dev and QA gateway on the same server,
we won't be able to test any updates in an isolated
environment before rolling out to QA..right?
you are right. you won't have an isolated environment for testing. it creates interdependancy between DEV/QA environments.
on the other hand, if DEV or QA server goes down, you end up loosing both the enviroments Gateway. it creates a SPF ( Single Point Failure) and it's not a best practice to do so from archicture point of view if you indend to maintain HA ( High Availability) 99.99% up-time.
Is it possible to have a Sun IDM gateway agent
instance on the same remote machine for DEV/QA?
this also creates a SPF situation.
or do we have to
install gateway separately on DEV and QA?
Since you have 3 different machines for 2 +1 Environments,
it is best practice to have
1. Seperate Gateway(s) for each Environment
1. For Dev, 1 For QA
so you have two isolated enviroments for testing, but also gives you the flexibility of keeping the QA Environment closer to Production possible without disturbing Dev
let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Sam
We have three different machines - one for IDM QA,
one for IDM DEV and one remote machine where Sun IDM
gateway is installed.
If we run the Dev and QA gateway on the same server,
we won't be able to test any updates in an isolated
environment before rolling out to QA..right?
Is it possible to have a Sun IDM gateway agent
instance on the same remote machine? or do we have to
install gateway separately on DEV and QA? Any
ideas??

ONE BI publisher for DEV and Production

Hi,
is there anyway I can setup ONE BI publisher for both the dev and production environment. the dev and production are in
separate boxes? the reason I need to do this is that oracle charges licenses fees for the development as well.
Thanks,
Odeh

Hi,
Iis technically possible to have two different databases pointing at BI Publisher, but you want to make sure the users can access the correct reports. But what I would say is that it isn't a particular good way to have your environments setup. The point of having a dev and a prod environment is to ensure that things are tested and proof of concept can be carried out without affecting the live systems. I would suggest that the separate licenses is worth the cost from my own personal experience, otherwise you risk having a live environment that is quite unstable.
Suzanne

Analysis Authorization In Dev and impact of reports and roles in prod trans

Hello,
We are planning to switch to analysis authorization. We plan to make that change first in Dev and we were wondering what would be the impact on roles and reports we transport from dev (which is switched to Analysis Authorization) to production( on Old authirization) ? We wont transport new things to production till we switch to new auth in Prd.
Thanks a lot,
BP.

Hello
Even if you are transporting the roles from dev to quality and production, the analysis authorization objects will not be checked until you set "current procedure..." in RSCUSTV23.
So there is no harm in transporting the roles and auhotrization until you change the concept to analysis.
regards,
Payal

Performance problems between dev and prod

I run the same query with identical data and indexes, but one system takes a 0.01 seconds to run while the production system takes 1.0 seconds to run. TKprof for dev is:
Rows Row Source Operation
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BANDVALUE
3 NESTED LOOPS
1 NESTED LOOPS
41 NESTED LOOPS
41 NESTED LOOPS
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_PACKAGE
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0032600 (object id 51356)
41 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BANDELEMENT
41 AND-EQUAL
82 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BE2 (object id 53559)
41 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BE1 (object id 53558)
41 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BAND
41 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0034599 (object id 53556)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0032549 (object id 51335)
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BV1 (object id 53557)Tkprof for Prod is :
Rows Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT MODE: ALL_ROWS
1 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BANDVALUE' (TABLE)
52001 NESTED LOOPS
26000 NESTED LOOPS
26000 NESTED LOOPS
26000 NESTED LOOPS
1 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_PACKAGE' (TABLE)
1 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0018725' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
26000 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BANDELEMENT' (TABLE)
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_BE2' (INDEX)
26000 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BAND' (TABLE)
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0030648' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0018674' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_BV1' (INDEX).The row count varies greatly. But it shouldn't as the data is the same.
Any ideas?

From DEV you show the Row Source Operations for the query. The column named "Rows" signifies the actual number of rows processed with each step.
From PROD you show the Execution Plan for the query; that is, tkprof was executed with the EXPLAIN option which generates the execution plan as of the time when tkprof was run. The "Rows" column in the Explain Plan output comes from the PLAN_TABLE.CARDINALITY, which represents an estimate by the CBO for the number of rows [expected to be] processed with each step.
So, if by <quote>The row count varies greatly</quote> you meant these "Rows" columns outputs then you're are comparing actuals from a database with estimates from another. Get the Row Source Operations from both.
"Identical data and indexes":
1. data may be the same, but it is not necessarily stored physically the same way.
2. Indexes being the same means their definitions are the same; again, physically they are not necessarily identical
In other words, data in PROD (the way it is stored on disk) may have evolved as a result of discrete deletes/updates/inserts ... in DEV it could be, for example, stored more compact if you took a copy of PROD and moved into DEV. So, the number of blocks for your segments will likely be different between PROD and DEV, the clustering factor for your indexes are likely different, etc ... things which could [and do] influence the CBO. The statistics may be different.
I guess what I'm saying is ... it is quite hard, if not outright impossible, to get two identical databases/instances/load ... hence, don't expect the executions to be 100% identical, even if you have "identical data and indexes". By all means compare between DEV and PROD (make sure you compare the same thing though) and use the observed differences as an indicator for further investigation ... don't chase the goal of 100% identical behavior.
Now, by all means look at that query taking 1 second in PROD ... I have only addressed <quote>The row count varies greatly. But it shouldn't as the data is the same.</quote>

BOBJ DEV and BOBJ Q.A environments are syncing :(

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for