BPM flow instance identifier in message mapping

Question: Is the unique instance identifier (number) of an executing BPM flow available to a message map being executed in a transformation step in the flow? I'm thinking that it would be a parameter available in the container object, or something like that. I would expect to need a user defined function to access it.
Thanks,
Chris

I doubt that you can do that.
All the StreamTransformationConstants that you can access can be found if you write
StreamTransformationConstants.
and press ctrl+space, in eclipse (or NWDS).
Make sure you have
import com.sap.aii.mapping.api.StreamTransformationConstants;
and that you have added aii_map_api.jar to your project.
Regards,
Henrique.

Similar Messages

To get exception value in Message Mapping

Hi folks,
I would like catch bpm step exception in one message mapping, for example:
I have create on ccBPM using one block, in block i have createad "ex" exception variable and set ex in all step (send and transformation), i have created one exception branch in block using "ex" exception.
How can i get "ex" value and pass for one message mapping ?
In MM how can i get text values from excpetion ocurred in ccBPM ?
Im am trying using Global Variables but not found any parameter of exceptions.
Can anybody help me, please?

hi,
>>In MM how can i get text values from excpetion ocurred in ccBPM ?
this is not possible
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

BPM Message Mapping: "Cannot produce target element /ns1:BAPI...."

Hi,
A scenario File - BPM - BAPI call was developed, as described in blog 'RFC scenario using BPM' cfr. link
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
The Mapping is as follows:
MT_EDB_MATERIAL_REQ (1:1) --> BAPI_MATERIAL_EXISTENCE_CHECK (1:1)
MATNR (1:1) -
> MATERIAL (1:1)
When executing the scenario, an error appears in the trace of SXMB_MONI, step 'Request Message Mapping'
Cannot produce target element /ns1:BAPI_MATERIAL_EXISTENCECHECK. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd....
I tried the following:
1) import the XML-file into the testmapping: executed successfully
File:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_EDB_MATERIAL_REQ xmlns:ns0="http://agfa.com/SD_EDB">
<MATNR>15P6X</MATNR>
</ns0:MT_EDB_MATERIAL_REQ>
2) Removed the mapping on node level and left mapping only on element level (material): same error
3) Activated the message mapping, interface mapping, determinations, etc again...:same error
4) Removed the Interface Mapping and created it again: same error
5) Compared the version ID of the Interface Mapping/message mapping in the Monitor trace with the version ID of the IR and saw that there was a difference.
After the CPA full cache, SXI_CACHE full refresh and object refresh in the IB Administration, the differences remain, and also the error....
Anybody an idea ?

Hi
>>>Cannot produce target element /ns1:BAPI_MATERIAL_EXISTENCECHECK. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd....
The error clearly says that one of the occurrence value for the target node mentioned is not coming from the source during mapping. The easiest way to solve the problem is as follows

First Execute the mapping as pointed out by "Raj" and the following steps.

1. Goto the Mapping Editor
2. Double click on the target node that is causing the problem here BAPI_MATERIAL_EXISTENCECHECK.
3. Right click on the same node and select "DisplayQueue".
4. View the Queue.
5. YOu will find "Suppress" entries, which means a value is expected but no value is coming in.
6.Go from right to left and check each node in the mapping and you will be able to trace where the suppress node comes from and take appropriate action
regards
krishna

CPU time of BPM or message mapping?

Hi all,
is there a way to find out how much CPU time is spent by a certain BPM instance (or message mapping instance)?
It would be sufficient to get that value per BPM type / message mapping type.
So far, I've found the following sources, which all won't work, unfortunately:
- table SWWWIHEAD: No CPU time information (as far as I see)
- transaction STAD: I don't see a way to connect an entry to the resp. BPM. There is a Transaction-ID, but I can't find it in the BPM...
- transaction ST03N: Only aggregated values for user WF_BATCH, not detailed statistics
- several places, which only show clock time, but not CPU time
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Dennis

Hi Michal,
Thanks a lot for your info.
Too bad that there is no other possibility yet.
I'm not completely sure whether the result is worth the effort, though, as there will probably be a lot of different BPM types on this system, so benchmarking each is quite some work (and requires an otherwise idle test system during this time).
In addition, it could be difficult to generate test data that will most likely represent the expected data during production use. Especially for BPMs with many conditional tasks (branches, loops, ...), this can be a mess...
But I will propose it anyway. If it gets accepted, I'll post the gained experience with this approach here. Maybe it works better than my pessimistic expection.
Hopefully, SAP will integrate this functionality somewhen. I guess I set up some customer feedback.
Kind regards,
Dennis

Accessing container variable of BPM in Message Mapping function

Hi,
I have a scenario in BPM where i have a container variable that is used as a loop counter.I want to access that counter defined , every time when i go around the loop and perform certain actions based on that counter. so how can i access that variable in my message Mapping function.

Hi Sudharshan,
check these links, hope they give you the required information (i think there is some problem with SDN site, check these links after a while)
Re: How to use Container Variable across Maps
Container object in Message Mapping
Copy value of container (abstract interface) to an other container
Regards
Vishnu

Different options for message mapping in BPM

Hey guys
i m in the learning phase of BPM and am kinda confused with the different ways we can do message mapping in a BPM scenario.
first of all we can do message mapping before BPM,we can also do after BPM and lastly we can do inside BPM(ofcurse this is not recommended as its too resource consuming)
i have bene through starters blog on BPM by Krishna moorthy and Arpit seth,and now am wondering how to use the mapping in diff. ways
suppose i m doing a simple File to File with BPM(just for practise purpose)
now here is what i have designed in IR
DT_sender_File DT_receiver_File
MT_sender_File MT_receiver_File
MI_Outbound_sender(async,outbound), MI_Inbound_receiver(async,inbound)
AI_sender(abstract,async) AI_receiver(abstract,async)
MM_File_File(using MT_sender_File and MT_receiver_File)
now i want to clear some doubts about interface mapping.my understanding is
if i do interface mapping between MI_Outbound_sender and AI_receiver,this will be interface mapping before BPM.
if i do interface mapping between AI_sender and MI_Inbound_receiver,this will be interafce mapping after BPM
and if i do interface mapping between AI_sender and AI_receiver then it will be mapping inside BPM.
is my understanding correct?if yes,then does that means we can we any of the above mapping in our scenario.(if we dont consider the performance issue as of now)
thanx
saif

Hi Saif,

is my understanding correct?
Yes, thts correct
if yes,then does that means we can we any of the above mapping in our scenario
Of course, u can use any of them (overlooking the performance issue)
Regards,
Prateek

How to Access a BPM container variable in XI graphical message mapping

Hello XI BPM and Mapping experts,
is it possible to access a BPM container variable from an graphical mapping?
If yes, how ?
We need this for the following scenario:
IDOC to BPM.
BPM transforms and sends transformed IDOC to fileadapter
If both steps are successful a STATUS.SYSTAT01 IDOC should be send back to SAP-ISU with status 06.
If one of these steps fails the status in the SYSTAT01 should be set to 05. (Exception branch of block)
We want to avoid to write 2 mapping programs for mapping the SYSTAT01.
Instead we would like to use a BPM Container Variable which contains the status.
In the mapping for the SYSTAT01 we want to use this Container Variable.
Is this possible?
Thanks for soon answers.
Regards Marlies

Hi Marlies,
Is not possible to acces a BPM container variable from graphical mapping. For other hand, you can to use runtime variables for this purpose.
You could create an abstract interface with a message type having a single node with the required value and using this message in other mapping.
Best regards
Ivá

Message Mapping Error in BPM

when message mapping, if the length of source field is longer than specified length, I need to output these kinds of messages. what is the solution?

Hi,
        try using a user defined function written in java where u can check for the condition and raise a exception.
           if(sourcefield.length()>16)
S.O.P("The Invoice Number is greater than 16 characters");
or
   using a BPM where u can check whether Invoice number is greater than 16 characters and if it is true then raise an exception and send the message through BPM.
regards
jithesh

Message Mapping outside BPM

I often see a point from XI-Legends that a Message Mapping should be executed out side the BPM and that will make the XI performance good.
How to do a Message Mapping outside BPM? What does it mean?
Any Blog that narrates the above situation?
Thanks.

Data Types
Source/Sender Data Format ---     DT_Sender File
Target/Receiver Data Format --     DT_Receiver
Message Types
Sender Message Type - MT_SenderFile
Receiver Message Type - MT_ReceiverFile
Message Interface
MI_OB_Sender(Async, Outbound)            MI_IB_Receiver(Asynch,Inbound)
AI_Sender(Async, Abstract)                    AI_Receiver(Async,Abstract)
So
if the mappaing is done between
MI_OB_Sender       To   AI_Receiver           (Its Before BPM)
AI_Sender              To   MI_IB_Receiver      (Its After BPM)
AI_Sender              to AI_Receiver            (Its inside BPM)
Whether my understanding is correct? Thanks for your patience.

Message mapping when using BPM?

We are doing a test to see if you can do a split of a string using standard functions, UDF or BPM.
We discovered that standard function has some of the functionality but if you are going to solve the problem that way the solution will be very complex. You will get no flexi bility in how to design the string and all the feilds will have to have fix length. So Standard functions are not the solution for us.
UDF works realy great. Write your java function and map it and everything are running.
We wont to test BPM as well. and i just started to look at it and how to solve it. I'm a newbee on BPM and for start I'm wondering how the message mapping should look to use in the BPM?
Sourcemessage looks as follow:
<Header>
 <Line>
 <SegmentA> 0 to unbounded
 <SegmentB> 0 to unbounded
 <SegmentC> 0 to unbounded
SegmentA contains a value to be copied to a segment in the target.
SegmentB contains a date to be copied to a targetelement.
SegmentC contains a string that we want to split into several elements in the target structure.
Targetmessage looks as follow:
<Header>
 <LineA> 1 to 1 (Will get the value from SegmentA in the sourcemessage.)
 <LineB> 1 to 1 (Will get the value from SegmentB in the sourcemessage.)
 <LineC> 0 to unbounded
 <ElementA> 0 to 1 (Will get a part of the string from SegmentC in the sourcemessage.)
 <ElementB> 0 to 1 (Will get a part of the string from SegmentC in the sourcemessage.)
 <ElementC> 0 to 1 (Will get a part of the string from SegmentC in the sourcemessage.)
To able to get the messages into BPM I need a interfacemapping and to do the interfacemapping I need to do a messagemapping. How should that messagemapping be configured?

> Now i want to try to replace that UDF with a BPM (Integration Process).
An UDF is part of a mapping and an Integration Process is used if you want to realize a more complex scenario then sending a message from System A to System B. In BPM you can do things like collecting messages, use timeouts, ...
But if you want to use a mapping in a BPM you define your mapping in your Integration Repository (like in a standard scenario without BPM) and then you can use the mapping in the Integration Process.
That's why i say it's maybe possible to realize your mapping without UDF (for example only with standard functions), but it makes no difference if you use BPM.
If you want to try finding a solution without UDF, i would suggest to open a new thread for this question.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Patrick

Multi-Message Mapping based on value of field - (Without BPM)

Hi.
I am having a bit of difficulty with multi-message mapping without BPM. I want to map to message1 & message2 based on a field in the rows of the source structure.
e.g.
row1-Source-Field1=> (if equal 0) => Message1-field1.
row2-Source-Field1=> (if equal 10) => Message2-field1.
To attempt to do this, I use the conditions in the graphical mapper:
if row-Source-Field1 = 0 => Map "Row to MessageType1".
if row-Source-Field1 = 10 => Map "Row to MessageType2".
However when I test this the mapping only seems to consider the first row value in row-Source-Field1 and ignores the fact that row two has a value of 10. I think this has something to do with contexts etc..
I would appreciate any help please.
Regards.
Mick.

in that case try this out
row1-source-field1 (remove context) -- UDF -splitbyvalue-target
UDF1(for message 1)
for(int i=0;i<field1.length;i++)
if(field1.equals("0"))
result.addValue(<field to be mapped>);
UDF2(for message 2)
for(int i=0;i<field1.length;i++)
if(field1.equals("10"))
result.addValue(<field to be mapped>);

BPM Pattern Collect Message Mapping run time error

Hi,
I'm carrying out a replica of BPMCOLLECTMESSAGE Pattern from sap basis...
Doing a simple file to file scenario and simple mapping....
I'm getting a MAPPING RUNTIME error at the transform step.
kindly help in this regards..
The checks i'v made are...
1. Deleted all the work flow items from SWWL transaction
2.SXI_CACHE is 0
3.Payload cross checked.
Is there any solution please ???

Hi,
On sending Stop message PE at technical details i get error stating : *com/sap/xi/tf/_BpmPatternCollectMerge_com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException:RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns0:Messages/ns0~*
kindly look at the Trace error at PE
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="T">CL_XMS_MAIN->DETERMINE_EXT_PID: CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender scheme external = XIParty</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender agency external = http://sap.com/xi/XI</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: receiver</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver scheme external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver agency external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party external =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party normalized =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine?type=entry</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS">
<Trace level="1" type="T">CL_XMS_MAIN->DETERMINE_EXT_PID: CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">CL_XMS_MAIN->DETERMINE_INT_PID: SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = PI2</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2009-03-17T04:35:42Z CET</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = D3370BB6DF244EA7356EECD16D0E6FAD</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start sender interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface BpmPatternCollectIfStopCollect</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace http://</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start receiver interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Loop 0000000001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--no sender or receiver interface definition found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hence set action to DEL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Exception from packaging: No messages for constructing a package available.</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Continue single processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = PI2</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2009-03-17T04:35:42Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">>>>PID delete old pid determination coding</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_INB">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_VALIDATION-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Reading sender agreement</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Inbound validation by Integration Engine does not take place</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTOX0__0002</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name =</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Exception from packaging: No messages for constructing a package available.</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Continue single processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = PI2</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2009-03-17T04:35:42Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">>>>PID delete old pid determination coding</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">No mapping required</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_OUTBOUND_BINDING">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV" />
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_XML_VALIDATION_RQ_OUT">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_VALIDATION-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Reading receiver agreement</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Outbound validation does not take place</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_CALL_ADAPTER" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_BPE-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start sender interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface BpmPatternCollectIfStopCollect</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace http://</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--start receiver interface action determination</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Loop 0000000001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface BpmPatternCollectIfStopCollect</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace http://</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">--no sender or receiver interface definition found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Hence set action to DEL</Trace>
</SAP:Trace>
Edited by: Robin on Mar 17, 2009 10:11 AM

Message mapping (data flow editor, data dependcies buttons not visible)

Hi,
In my SAP PI...IR ...in message mapping screen some buttons are not enable/visible like
data flow editor, data dependcies,clear mapping buttons not visible)
any oss notes/help will be appreciated.
Thanks

Hi,
This will help you
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/02/13/unable-to-open-iresrid-xipipi-71-updated-for-pi-71-support
Go for 1.4.X version than 1.6.X The Problem will be resolved
Regards
Sangeetha

Request Message mapping in SXMB_MONI for File - RFC - File without BPM

Hi ,
In my File-RFC-File scenario, the messages are processed successfully.
but when i look into the SXMB_MONI for File to RFC step, the records are present only till the Message split According to Receiver List and not able to see the records from Request Message mapping step onwards.it contains
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<ns1:Z_PI_LOTUSNOTES_UNIFORM xmlns:ns1="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions" />
in my mapping for the receiver RFC i have not done the mapping for all the fields. few fields i have disabled. whether this could create a problem in message mapping. pls let me know what needs to be done.

Is it only for this scenario that the above display issue is occuring or is it for all scenarios?
If onlt a particular Pipeline steps are displayed then you can check what is the TRACE level set in SXMB_ADM --> Integration Engine Configuration --> and check if the TRACE parameter is set to at least 2 (max is 3 which will ensure that your DB will get full quickly)
For more information refer: /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/05/10/xi-i-cannot-see-some-of-my-messages-in-the-sxmbmoni
Regards,
Abhishek.

Retrieve Specific Mapping Error Information Within BPM Flow.

I have an Integration Process which executes a message mapping step prior to further processing. When the message mapping receives an error there is an exception branch
within the process that will send an email using the Mail Receiver Adapter. The mail message prototcol is XIALL which sends the payload and soap envelope.
However, I need to retrieve the actual error returned from the mapping step and forward that specific information to the originator of the failed message as an email.
I know we can use the alert functions to send alerts, but my requirement is to send the actual error via email to our external vendors / customers.
Has anyone had success doing this?

Hi, have you got it done? Please share!
Thanks,
Karthik

BPM flow instance identifier in message mapping

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for