BPM using multiple interface

Hi All,
i have a sceanrio where i have one sender idoc and multiple(5) soap receivers.so i have five interface that have same sender idoc and different soap receiver.Soap is syncronous and sending us the response of that message.
So we have to create a scenario as IDOCSoapRequestSoapResponse---File for each interface
I know it requires BPM to fullfill the condition of multiple interface.Please suggest the BPM design to achive the scenario.
Regards
Laxmi Bhushan

hi Laxmi Bhushan Jha ,
IDOCSoapRequestSoapResponse---File for each interface
As per my knowledge that is poosiable and simple with SOAP Lookup in ESR Mapping
for Soap Lookup:
Webservice Calls From a User Defined Function.
and coming to id:
in receiver determination , we need to define multiple recievers
in interface determiination, we define multiple operation mappings.
thanks,

Similar Messages

How to use multiple Interfaces for the same BS?

Hi @ ,
Is it possible to have a scenarion where i am using multiple interfaces in the same BS based upon some conditional field in the message.
I amnot able to get the solution I know with condition editor I can have multiple receivers but in my scenarion based upon message fiels i have to decide which BAPI to be used and wht mapping and then post it to the same System
Any help will be highly rewarded
Regards

Hi-
Yes it is possible you can use multimapping for mapping the interfaces.
To know more about multimapping see
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/21/6faf35c2d74295a3cb97f6f3ccf43c/content.htm
Some more helpful links
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible

How java support multiple inheritance by the use of interface.

As per my understanding, Interface is just having the signatures of the methods not the implementation.
So How java support multiple inheritance by the use of interface?
Answer 1: we can institate interface reference by its implemented
class.
          �� interface inf...
          �� class aa implements inf..
          �� class bb implements inf....
           Now, inf i = new aa();
           inf i = new bb();
Answer 2: We can extends as many interface as we want in the
single
           interface.
           i.e. interface infFirst....
           interface infSecond....
           interface infThird....
           Now ,
           interface ingMulti extends infFrist, infThird...
By above two answers its not prity clear as per the multiple inheritance in C or C++.
           i.e.
           class first{
           method abc();....}
           class second{
           method bbc()......}
           class multi::first::second{
           we can call to abc();.....as well as bbc();
-Please give your important suggstion on the same.(Hope I explain it well.)
-Jeff

The keyword implement is used only for interfaces not
for abstract class. If i am wrong correct me.I believe your right, but I will double check.
As for the multiple inheritence think about the following code:
class Animal {
    // Animal generic stuff in this class
interface Eat {
    // Generic stuff that models eating behavior
interface Runs {
    // generic methods that model running behavior
public class Horse extends Animal implements Eat, Runs {
    // Stuff specific to a horse
}The Animal class is generic but has stuff in it common to all animals.
The Eat interface models behavior that is generic to eating, all living things have to eat something to survive. Herbavore are different from carnivores.
The Runs interface models generic behavior to running, such as speed. A cheeta definately runs faster than a human.
This brings us to the Horse class. It extends the Animal class because it "is-a" animal, and it implements the eat and runs interface because they are behaviors a horse has.
I hope that helps.
Extending an abstract class is the same as extending a regular class with the exception you MUST override all abstract methods in the abstract class. Thats not too difficult but I believe when designing classes, designing an abstract can be more diffecult than modeling the base class, and generic behaviors in interfaces. JMO.
JJ

Delete a column froma table that is used in multiple interfaces

Is there a way to delete a column from a table where the table is being used in an interface ? The only way I could find so far was to delete the interface, delete the column then recreate the interface.
Otherwise deleting warns that the object is referred to by another object and lists the interfaces.
unfortunately the table in question is being referred to in multiple interfaces, so I'd prefer not to have to recreate all of them.
Many thanks

You can delete all the mappings (source an target) which refer to this column and then physically delete the column.
It's long but maybe better than dropping the whole interfaces using this column.
Regards and Merry Christmas
Brice

Multiple records in BPM using Switch

Hi Frnds,
I was doing File to RFC to Webservice sceanrio using multiple records.
For that i have used
ReceiveTransformation-Block(ForEach)-Send Sync-ContainerEndBlock-TransformationSendTransformation(Multimapping)-Block-switch-sendsync-containerendblock-Transformation---send.
In switch, i was checking the condition like, if the material is present, then it got the first branch or else it should go to next branch.
In switch i was facing the problem, if i give multiple records with the same value, i am getting the output. If i give different values like for one record, material is present and the other record material is not present, then i am not getting the output.
Could you please help in this issue.

In switch i was facing the problem, if i give multiple records with the same value, i am getting the output
The standard behaviour of Switch is that in case of multiple records, the Last Record value is taken and checked with the switch condition.
U break all the records into individual records usinf "Recordset per message = 1" or transform one message with multiple records into multiple records, save it into multiline container variable and then use Block with mode ForEach.
Regards,
Prateek

Single IDOC to Multiple Interface Mapping

We have a requirement in our project where one masterdata IDOC will be sent from a SAP MDM box and will be transformed to a target IDOC and be sent to an SAP SNC box. However, the scenario is that depending on the contents of the IDOC, there can be multiple IDOCs that need to be created. For example, the single MDM IDOC has V1, V2 and V3 values then the IDOCS that should be sent to the SAP SNC box should be three.
The IT head of the customer decided against using Enhanced Interface Determination (since the problem can be easily solved using a 1:n mapping) due to the complexity especially when the solution is rolled out to other regions as each region has it's own logic (currently, the other implementation has only 1:1 mapping so there is no problem). I had developed a 1:n mapping but the resulting map is too big and very complex.
What I tried to do is to create separate mappings for each scenario that an IDOC needs to be generated out of the values from the received IDOC in XI and then define rules in the Interface Determination. Problem is that XI throws an error stating that multiple interfaces are found. So I cannot use Interface Determination to trigger creation of multiple IDOCS of the same type with different values from a single IDOC sent by the same SAP box.
Question is, is there any way to solve this requirement without using Enhanced Receiver Determination. I was thinking of BPM but not really sure how to do it.
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards,
Rommel Mendoza
Hewlett Packard Asia-Pacific, Ltd.

Thanks a lot for that.
For example, We have this input Message:
<ZMATMA>
<IDOC>
 <E1MARAM>
 <E1MARMM>
 <MEINH>IT</MEINH>
 </E1MARMM>
 <E1MARMM>
 <MEINH>CS</MEINH>
 </E1MARMM>
 <E1MARMM>
 <MEINH>SW</MEINH>
 </E1MARMM>
 </E1MARAM>
</IDOC>
</ZMATMA>
then there should be an output of:
<SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<IDOC>
 <BUOM>IT</BUOM>
</IDOC>
</SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<IDOC>
 <BUOM>CS</BUOM>
</IDOC>
</SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<IDOC>
 <BUOM>SW</BUOM>
</IDOC>
</SAVEMULTIPLE204>
The logic is when the MEINH field of the ZMATMA02 IDOC has the values: IT, CS and SW, create one IDOC for each.
Thanks in advance!
Edited by: Rommel Mendoza on Nov 6, 2008 7:30 PM

Idoc to multiple interfaces in XI

Hi,
how can we handle same Idoc ( MATMAS.MATMAS03) sending to multiple interfaces in XI otherthan using multi mapping?
If we develop one scenario now and in future if you want to send same idoc to different systems, do we have to change the existing interface?. Alternatively is it possible to add another interface?. Please clarify.

ok, as it's case 1, I think it's easier.
You have two ways:
1. Inside ID, use your previous Scenario:
=> after that, you will have 1 scenario...
1.1 Create a new Business Process (BPM_2)
1.2 Inside your existing Receiver Determination, add your new BPM_2 as a receiver (use righ-click + "insert above").
1.3 with your triplet "Sender_name + Sender_interface + BPM_2", create your Interface Determination
1.4 As receiver is a BPM, Receiver Agreement is not needed.
Then, you need to configure the step "BPM_2 -> Receiver_2"
1.5 Create a Receiver Determination between your BPM_2 (sender) and your receiver_2.
1.6 create your Interface Determination
1.7 create your Receiver Agreement (receiver adapter)
2. Inside ID, use a new Scenario:
=> after that, you will have 2 scenarios which use the SAME Receiver Determination "Matmas -> Receiver_1 + BPM_2"
2.1 create a new Scenario
2.2 ADD to this scenario your existing Receiver Determination ("Matmas -> Receiver_1").
2.2 do the same steps than "1.1 -> 1.7"
At the end, you will have:
Matmas --> | Receiver_1 => File_1 with single Idoc
 | BPM_2
 BPM_2 --> Receiver_2 => File_2 with collected IDocs
Mickael
Message was edited by: Mickael Huchet

Timesten replication with multiple interfaces sharing the same hostname

Hi,
we have in our environment two Sun T2000 nodes, running SunOS 5.10 and hosting a TT server currently in Release 7.0.5.9.0, replicated between each other.
I would like to have some more information on the behavior of the replication w.r.t. network reliability when using two interfaces associated to the same hostname, the one used to define the replication element.
To make an example we have our nodes sharing this common /etc/hosts elements:
151.98.227.5 TBMAS10df2 TBMAS10df2-10 TBMAS10df2-ttrep
151.98.226.5 TBMAS10df2 TBMAS10df2-01 TBMAS10df2-ttrep
151.98.227.4 TBMAS9df1 TBMAS9df1-10 TBMAS9df1-ttrep
151.98.226.4 TBMAS9df1 TBMAS9df1-01 TBMAS9df1-ttrep
with the following element defined for replication:
ALTER REPLICATION REPLSCHEME
ADD ELEMENT HDF_GNP_CDPN_1 TABLE HDF_GNP_CDPN
CHECK CONFLICTS BY ROW TIMESTAMP
COLUMN ConflictResTimeStamp
REPORT TO '/sn/sps/HDF620/datamodel/tt41dataConflict.rpt'
MASTER tt41data ON "TBMAS9df1-ttrep"
SUBSCRIBER tt41data ON "TBMAS10df2-ttrep"
RETURN RECEIPT BY REQUEST
ADD ELEMENT HDF_GNP_CDPN_2 TABLE HDF_GNP_CDPN
CHECK CONFLICTS BY ROW TIMESTAMP
COLUMN ConflictResTimeStamp
REPORT TO '/sn/sps/HDF620/datamodel/tt41dataConflict.rpt'
MASTER tt41data ON "TBMAS10df2-ttrep"
SUBSCRIBER tt41data ON "TBMAS9df1-ttrep"
RETURN RECEIPT BY REQUEST;
On this subject moving from 6.0.x to 7.0.x there has been some changes I would like to better understand.
6.0.x reported in the documentation for Unix systems:
If a host contains multiple network interfaces (with different IP addresses),
TimesTen replication tries to connect to the IP addresses in the same order as
returned by the gethostbyname call. It will try to connect using the first address;
if a connection cannot be established, it tries the remaining addresses in order
until a connection is established.
Now On Solaris I don't know how to let gethostbyname return more than one interface (the documention notes at this point:
If you have multiple network interface cards (NICs), be sure that “multi
on” is specified in the /etc/host.conf file. Otherwise, gethostbyname will not
return multiple addresses).
But I understand this could be valid for Linux based systems not for Solaris.
Now if I properly understand the above, how was the 6.0.x able to realize the first interface in the list (using the same -ttrep hostname) was down and use the other, if gethostbyname was reporting only a single entry ?
Once upgraded to 7.0.x we realized the ADD ROUTE option was added to teach TT how to use different interfaces associated to the same hostname. In our environment we did not include this clause, but still the replication was working fine regardless of which interface we were bringing down.
My both questions in the end lead to the same doubt on which is the algorithm used by TT to reach the replicated node w.r.t. entries in the /etc/hosts.
Looking at the nodes I can see that by default both routes are being used:
TBMAS10df2:/-# netstat -an|grep "151.98.227."
151.98.225.104.45312 151.98.227.4.14000 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.227.5.14005 151.98.227.4.47307 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.227.5.14005 151.98.227.4.48230 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.227.5.46050 151.98.227.4.14005 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
TBMAS10df2:/-# netstat -an|grep "151.98.226."
151.98.226.5.14000 151.98.226.4.47699 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.226.5.14005 151.98.226.4.47308 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
151.98.226.5.44949 151.98.226.4.14005 1049792 0 1049800 0 ESTABLISHED
Tried to trace with ttTraceMon but once I brought down one of the interfaces did not see any reaction on either node, if you have some info it would be really appreciated !
Cheers,
Mike

Hi Chris,
Thanks for the reply, I have few more queries on this.
1.Using the ROUTE CLAUSE we can use multiple IPs using priority level set, so that if highest priority level set in thr ROUTE clause for the IP is not active it will fall back to the next level priority 2 set IP. But cant we use ROUTE clause to use the multiple route IPs for replication simultaneously?
2. can we execute multiple schema for the same DSN and replication scheme but with different replication route IPs?
for example:
At present on my system, I have a replication scheme running for a specific DSN with stand alone Master-Subscriber mechanism, with a specific route IP through VLAN-xxx for replication.
Now I want to create and start another replication scheme for the same DSN and replication mechanism with a different VLAN-yyy route IP to be used for replication in parallel to the existing replication scheme. without making any changes to the pre-existing replication scheme.
for the above scenarios, will there be any specific changes respective to the different replication schema mechanism ie., Active Standby and Standalone Master Subscriber mechanism etc.,
If so what are the steps. like how we need to change the existing schema?
Thanks In advance.
Naveen

Issue in File to RFC to File Scenario with BPM using Block Step

Hi Everybody,
                       I am doing File to RFC to File Scenario for multiple records using BPM using Block Step. The File Message is getting posted and after that, the message is getting stuck up in the qRFC Monitor (Inbound Queue).
                    After seeing the message in Inbound Queue, I am trying to execute and release the message. But when i execute the LUW, it says " Function module doesnt exist or EXCEPTION raised" in Inbound queue.
Could somebody suggest me the outcome of this? What does this mean and how to
release the stuck up message in Queue.
Thanks and Regards,
N.Jayanth Kumar

Hi Rajesh,
                       After going through the blog, i saw the trace messages. It says
" The   exception occurred (program: CL_SWF_XI_INBOUND=============CP, include CL_SWF_XI_INBOUND=============CM00F, line: 19)"
Regards,
N.Jayanth Kumar

Single SOAP receiver adapter for multiple interfaces

Hi,
I have to send multiple interfaces like Vendor, Customer, Material to one receiver.
I want to configure only one communication channel (receiver SOAP adapter) to send all these interfaces. Is this possible?
Currently I am provided with different URLs from the receiver system as below.
http://host:port/Services/Vendor.wsdl
http://host:port/Services/customer.wsdl
http://host:port/ServicesMaterial.wsdl
I will be having 3 Sender agreement, 3 receiver determination, 3 interface determination and 3 Receiver agreement.
I want only one SOAP reciever adapter which goes inside all the above 3 Receiver agreement.
So When I give the target url as http://host:port/Services, the messages fail.
But When I specify the full targert url in the adapter as http://host:port/Services/Vendor.wsdl then it works.
Which means I would have to create as many communication channel as interfaces.
Is there a work around for this?

hi kantheri,
For this, we have to fill the TargetURL and the SOAPAction in Receiver Communication channel dynamically.
So, we need to write UDF in Message Mappings using DynamicConfiguration to fill the TargetURL and the SOAPAction Dynamically.
DynamicConfigurationKey keyURL = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","THeaderSOAPACTION");
DynamicConfigurationKey targetURL=DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","TServerLocation");
// access dynamic configuration
DynamicConfiguration conf = (DynamicConfiguration) container
.getTransformationParameters()
.get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
conf.put(keyURL,"Soap action");
conf.put(targetURL,"target url");
return "";
In this UDF, we are filling the TargetURL in u201CTServerLocationu201D message attribute and SOAPAction in u201CTHeaderSOAPActionu201D message attribute.
So, whenever we execute this corresponding operation these values will be filled in receiver communication channel at runtime.
TargetURL- Give some dummy URL or http://
SOAPAction - *
regards,
ganesh.

Configuration Scenario for BPM Using Integration Scenario

hi All,
I Have an Scenario where i am using BPM. Most of the blog tells about manually creating all Configuration objects. I had created an Integration Scenario for this scenario by referring to the earlier threads available for same.
Hoe to Create Integration Scenario for BPM Scenario
Integration Scenario in BPM and few more.
My IS looks like
Sender App Component - Integration Process - Receiver App Component
Now when i am trying to create Configuration scenario for same using model configurator, i am getting Model as "Not Configurable"
And when i click "Configurability Check" Button, i am getting below as status:
Component view IS_POC_BPM: Connection from receivePayload to getABSPayload does not have an inbound service interface
Component view IS_POC_BPM : Connection from sendABSPayload to getPayload has no outbound interface
getABSPayload and sendABSPayload are actions for Abstract interfaces.
IS_POC_BPM is the Integration Process Name.
Also in Integration Scenario, when i create connection between sender action to BPM action there is no inbound interface coming. And viceversa.
Please help me in identifying if i am doing any thing wrong in creating this scenario.
Is it possible to create Configuration Scenario for BPM Using Integration Scenario?
Thanks,
Mayank
Edited by: Mayank Gupta on Apr 21, 2010 6:35 AM

I think you shoudl refer the available Integration Scenarios created for BPMs in IR --> SAP BASIS --> http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/Patterns
Sender template will have the Action with Outbound Service Interface and then in the BPM Template the action will have Inbound Interface.....then within the BPM itself this inbound will be mapped to Action with Abstract Interface
may be after looking the Integration scenarios you will get more idea
Regards,
Abhishek.

PO7.31 and BPM: Using Operation Mapping within BPM

Hello everyone!
I am facing an issue while trying the import/execute an Operation Mapping within a BPM. Have a PO 7.31SP07 installation (NWDS also on 7.31 SP07), and the process already have some working interface calls to PI, however still having issue while trying to execute the Operation Mapping:
1. After deploying the process, going to NWA -> SOA tab -> Application and Scenario Communication -> Application Communication -> select the process -> check the "localhost"/WS group for "Local System". The "Processing State" shows the error below:
Configuration for service group [localhost] failed. Error details:
[No endpoints found. Check if the service is configured and if its
endpoints are available in the . Service:
[{http://fusionconsultoria.com.br/sales_order_create}fusionconsultoria_salesord_om_SalesOrderSplit_ServicePortType]
Assigned Provider: [Local System]
Service Group: [localhost]
Service Group application: [fusionconsultoria/salesord]
Service Reference application: [fusionconsultoria/salesord]
2. During runtime, when trying to execute the OM automated step, on log viewer:
Error during SCA Processing
[EXCEPTION]
com.sap.engine.interfaces.sca.config.exception.ESBConfigurationException:
Could not process message for operation om_SalesOrderSplit_Service in
web service plugin module.
at com.sap.engine.services.sca.plugins.ws.WebServiceImplementationInstance.accept(WebServiceImplementationInstance.java:223)
at com.sap.engine.services.sca.das.SCADASImpl.invokeReference(SCADASImpl.java:314)
Caused by: com.sap.esi.esp.lib.mm.config.exceptions.ObjectNotExistsException:
Configuration not found for application:
fusionconsultoria/salesord,serviceRefId:{http://www.sap.com}salesord_fusionconsultoria~salesord~BPMcomponent_29768b4e-f59a-4ba3-a2ff-dee594b01ecf_WS.
Please check the configuration details from the NWA. You may have not
assigned the Service Group to a Provider System, or the generation of
the configuration has failed.
3. Carried out the steps from the referenced links below. They are quite similar to each other, however still facing the issue:
Reuse PI Operation Mapping as a service in SAP NetWeaver BPM
Using Operation Mappings (PI) in a BPM Process - Process Orchestration - SAP Library
Using NetWeaver PI’s Mapping in NetWeaver BPM
- Marked as "local provider" and WS;
4. Tried deleting, creating the automated step aswell reimporting the Operation Mapping.
5. Already reviewed the input/output mapping of the automated activity;
6. On ESR, the mapping works correctly.
7. Tried changing the outbound and inbound Service interfaces for the OM from stateless to stateless XI3.0, as well from synchronous to asynchronous.
At this moment I've completely ran out of ideas. Appreciate if anyone could give any insights, since I am running out of time with this project!
Thanks in advance to all and
Best regards,
Lucas Santos

Hi Lucus
I'm facing the same type of problem.
Why would re-creating the BPM fix this issue ?.    I fear I would spend all this effort for nothing.
What does your operation mapping wsdl:service > soap:address look like ?   What does your NWA BPM application Communication Configuration look like now - before you had that red light - like I have now.
The WSDL that is generated from the imported Operation Mapping : what end point is expected here. My wsdl:service > soap:address location has a port of 50500 - which does not even exist!. How can it work Does this get automatically deployed onto the Service Registry?.
I have built and deployed this but I get a run time error when it executes the operation mapping.   A technical error during invocation: Could not invoke service reference name.
I have seen in the deployed BPM's Application Configuration against the Consumed Service Groups an error against the associated service group
Configuration for service
group [SG_localhost] failed. Error details: [No endpoints found. Check if the service is configured and if its endpoints are available in the . Service
It almost seems that it wants me to publish the end point on the service registry - no idea how....but I none of the blogs and post indicate that I need to fiddle with this at all.
I have this question in SDN too if you care to take a look.

HMI using multiple VI´s

Hi. I'm beggining to use Labview as HMI, but I don't know exactly how to do it. I'd like to build about 4 screens to navigate. I've read that I could use tab control, but when I tried, only the chosen tab was working properly - the others lost data. My application consists in control of a simple educational / research plant (about 3 inputs and 3 outputs), to work with PID / fuzzy control. How can I do this HMI (the easiest way)? Does anyone have a step-by-step tutorial on this subject?
Mauro
Labview 8.2
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Mauro,
Bellow there are a link where you can find some information about how to develop a user interface using Event-Driven, so you can use multiple loops to acquire and present data according the user interaction.
Developing User Interfaces with Event-Driven Programming
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/5785
Using Local Variables, Queues, and Notifiers to Synchronize Data with Parallel Loops
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/epd/p/id/3717
Bellow some information about Design Patterns that can be useful for your application.
Application Design Patterns: Master/Slave
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3022
Application Design Patterns: Producer/Consumer
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/3023
I hope that it may help you.
Regards,
Osvaldo Santos

Encrypting Aironet 1410 bridge link using multiple VLANs

I've looked at the documentation available for Aironet 1400 series, and still would like to see a single document showing an example of
the best encryption/authentication available for bridge links using multiple VLANs.
As I understand it, 1400 series can support WPA-PSK using AES, which would work for me. I just can't picture how to integrate chapters 9 and 10 for the 'WEP and WEP Features' + 'Configuring Authentication Types' instructions.
I'm looking either for an example config, or a step-by-step that did all steps consecutively.
Thanks

What doc are you refering to? If you want to encrypt the link from root bridge to non-root bridge, then WPA/TKIP-PSK is what you should use. Here is a link to how to setup your link ssid to WPA: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/bridge/1400/12.2_15_JA/configuration/guide/p15auth.html#wp1044935
Don't worry about the example they show on the WEP, just use the configuration from the above link for your encryption.
Configuring a VLAN
Configuring your bridge to support VLANs is a five-step process:
1. Create subinterfaces on the radio and Ethernet interfaces.
2. Enable 802.1q encapsulation on the subinterfaces and assign one subinterface as the native VLAN.
3. Assign a bridge group to each VLAN.
4. (Optional) Enable WEP on the native VLAN. <-- Use WPA-PSK
5. Assign the bridge's SSID to the native VLAN.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/bridge/1400/12.2_15_JA/configuration/guide/p15vlan.html
Here is an example of vlan 1 (native) will be your management and your wireless link. vlan 10 & 20 will pass through the link.
BR# configure terminal
BR(config)# interface dot11radio0.1
BR(config-subif)# encapsulation dot1q 1 native
BR(config-subif)# bridge group 1
BR(config-subif)# exit
BR(config)# interface fastEthernet0.1
BR(config-subif)# encapsulation dot1q 1 native
BR(config-subif)# bridge group 1
BR(config)# interface fastEthernet0.10
BR(config-subif)# encapsulation dot1q 10
BR(config-subif)# bridge group 10
BR(config)# interface fastEthernet0.20
BR(config-subif)# encapsulation dot1q 20
BR(config-subif)# bridge group 20
BR(config-subif)# exit
BR(config)# interface dot11radio0
BR(config-if)# ssid batman
BR(config-ssid)# vlan 1
BR(config-ssid)# infrastructure-ssid
BR(config-ssid)# end

SWIG - C++/Java and multiple interface inheritance - SWIG typemaps

In C++ I have the following. Can someone explain how to use SWIG typemaps to accomplish multiple interface inheritance in Java? I understand there is a javainterfaces typemap built into SWIG however I am such a newb with SWIG I really don't know where to start.
class IRemoteSyncIO
public:
virtual ~IRemoteSyncIO () {}
protected:
IRemoteSyncIO () {}
private:
IRemoteSyncIO (const IRemoteSyncIO&);
IRemoteSyncIO& operator= (const IRemoteSyncIO&);
class IRemoteAsyncIO
public:
virtual ~IRemoteAsyncIO () {}
protected:
IRemoteAsyncIO () {}
private:
IRemoteAsyncIO (const IRemoteAsyncIO&);
IRemoteAsyncIO& operator= (const IRemoteAsyncIO&);
class RemoteMpe : public IRemoteSyncIO, public IRemoteAsyncIO
}Thanks!

Actually now I understand what you mean.... Ok, now I am going to modify the problem slightly and add Interface2 into the picture. The new code is:
interface Interface1<SelfType extends Interface1<SelfType>>
interface Interface2
class Superclass implements Interface1<Superclass>
class Dependant<Type extends Interface1<Type>>
 public static <Type extends Interface1<Type> & Interface2> Dependant<Type> getInstance(Class<Type> c)
 return new Dependant<Type>();
class Subclass extends Superclass implements Interface2
public Subclass()
 Dependant<Subclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Subclass.class);
}Now, previously I could replace:
Dependant<Subclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Subclass.class);
with
Dependant<Superclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Superclass.class);
and it solved the problem, but now that Type must implement Interface2 I cannot.
The reason I added this requirement is that this is actually what is going on in my applicationI had made mistakely omited this detail from the original use-case.
Can you think up of a possible solution to this new use-case?
Thanks,
Gili

BPM using multiple interface

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for