Brazil - SAP Standard Delivered Rule / Config for R/3 ?

Hi
I have recently come across an issue with updating a Brazilian employees IT0008 - Basic Pay screen. I was trying to modify the start date of the screen (BEGDA) to reflect a date other than the 1st of the month. When I attempt to do this though I get a hard stop error message.
I was told that this rule / hard stop error message in R/3 when trying to update IT8 for Brazil employees was as standard delivered SAP rule.
I am trying to validate if that is the case, and if so if anyone can give me more details on this SAP delivered rule / functionality.
If it's not a SAP delivered, but something my company has put in place perhaps, is there a way to find out in R/3 where this rule is set-up/referenced in order to remove it potentially to allow for IT8 Begda changes for Brazil ?
Any help on this matter would be much appreciated and rewarded with points.
Nicola.

Please check the BADI under the following include
Main Program     MP000800
Source code of   MPPERS00
Form - POST_INPUT_EDYNR
Line - PERFORM badi_after_input(sapfp50m).
IMP_NAME     BR_SALARY_INCREASE
INTER_NAME     IF_EX_HRPAD00INFTY
IMP_CLASS     CL_IM_BR_SALARY_INCREASE
Main Program     CL_IM_BR_SALARY_INCREASE======CP
Source code of   CL_IM_BR_SALARY_INCREASE======CM002
method IF_EX_HRPAD00INFTY~AFTER_INPUT
Line 23 - 35
Regards
Ravikumar

Similar Messages

Best practices / preferred usage of SAP standard (delivered) roles

Dear Experts,
When going about designing roles for a new system, what is the preferred usage on SAP standard/delivered roles? I was thinking of using them as a "base", then tweaking auth objects here and there to make the roles work but the more I work with them, I find it may be better to create roles entirely from scratch. A lot of the time, I find a lot of inactivated auth objects or objects that seem to not really be needed when looking at the t-codes offered in the menu (S_TCODE).
In that case, I figured it might be cleaner if I started creating roles and adding t-codes via the Menu and maintaining only the auth objects that are proposed in PFCG (and adding a few if necessary).
Do people typically build their roles around these the standard SAP role set or is it preferred to create your own and only use the SAP standard roles as reference (i.e. the t-codes offered in the menu, etc.)?
Thanks for any insights!

> When going about designing roles for a new system, what is the preferred usage on SAP standard/delivered roles?
Those are provided by SAP as a reference so that you can consult with the Authorization Structure of a Standard Position / Task for which you are going to create your own role. For e.g. what are the TCodes, values of Objects should be given to users for their tasks.
I was thinking of using them as a "base", then tweaking auth objects here and there to make the roles work but the more I work with them, I find it may be better to create roles entirely from scratch.
Absolutely! Please do not use SAP delivered roles for you use and also don't try to alter any values.
A lot of the time, I find a lot of inactivated auth objects or objects that seem to not really be needed when looking at the t-codes offered in the menu (S_TCODE).
>
> In that case, I figured it might be cleaner if I started creating roles and adding t-codes via the Menu and maintaining only the auth objects that are proposed in PFCG (and adding a few if necessary).
>
> Do people typically build their roles around these the standard SAP role set or is it preferred to create your own and only use the SAP standard roles as reference (i.e. the t-codes offered in the menu, etc.)?
>
Yes.. as reference.. as you say..
Regards,
Dipanjan

Adding a custom field in a sap standard screen in pa30 for an infotype.

Hi to all..
i'm in a requirement to add a custom field in a standard screen of pa30. for the infotype 0442.
I googled up.. but i was not getting proper solution for it.. can any one provide a solution for it..
With regards.
Aahbha.

Hello Sirs,
Step by step instructions on:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/4f/d52552575e11d189270000e8322f96/frameset.htm
The below thread provide more info on how to create an infotype from scratch, but this is just for the reference:
add custom fields to standard infotype
Regards,
Bentow.

SAP STANDARD RETRIGGER WORK FLOW FOR SC CHANGES -SRM 550

Hello ALL
assume that we use any standard sap WF templates
SC created
SC awaiting for manager approval
now requester changes any piece of data . will work flow retrigger ( again workitem created) for any cosmetic changes upon standard work flow templates used?
what are the actions on shopping cart will retrigger the workflow
now sc is awaiting for approval but below actions done by REQUESTER in the shopping cart
1. changing sc descrition name?
2. notes for approval?
3.change qty /price /uom/ pg /product changes/ cost center changes /add attachment
4.changing vendor
please share what are the above actions will retrigger the workflow in SAP STANDARD.
etc
Mutu

Hi,
There is BBP_WFL_SECURITY setting in SRM 5.0.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/37/830b3b7e7ef74de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
I'm not sure if the table BBPD_COMP_FIELDS is for checking the changes.
We can get answer by testing.
Regards,
Masa

List of available SAP standard delivered forms (print and interactive)

Hi,
does anyone know where to get a complete list of all available SAP standard forms (print and interactive) and where to download the latest versions of the forms?
best regards
norbert

Hi Norbert,
    I am also looking for standard Adobe forms latest version . If you have got it , kindly tell me where i can get them .
    I searched for stadard form SD_BIL_PRINT01 in my system in SFP transaction , but its not available .
   Kindly guide me regarding this issue .
Regards,
S.Sivakumar
Edited by: sivakumar subramaniam on Oct 9, 2009 1:52 AM
Edited by: sivakumar subramaniam on Oct 10, 2009 1:51 PM

SAP standard form or template for check printing

Hi Guys
Is anyone aware of any standard SAP output templates, forms or output types that exist for printing checks?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Sunit

Hi,
1.Go to SE71 and enter the SAP standard layout set F110_PRENUM_CHK. Copy this layout set into custom SAP script starting with Z.
( it will be easy to copy from standard layout set instead of creating SAP script).
2. Then change the copied layout as per the custom requirement.
3. Then go to FBZP transaction and in the payment methods for company code, find the company code click on "Paylink Cheques" and assign the custom form name here.
Once you are ok with the format and test the form otherwise go to sap script form and do the changes in layout.
4. Check print program name is RFFOUS_C. Go to SE38 and the run the program RFFOUS_C. There you can see all the form names used for check printing.
Regards,
Jyothi CH.

SAP standard FM or BAPI for getting customer details from condition record

Can someone suggest some SAP standard BAPI or FM with the help of which we can get the customer details of all it's pricing conditions maintained in condition tables provided we have the condition record number with us.

Hi,
look at the below BAPI's
BAPI_CUSTOMER_DISPLAY
BAPI_CUSTOMER_GETDETAIL2
Regards
Sudheer

SAP Standard Field Attributes for ME21n and ME

Hi,
Can anyone suggest me where i can see all the display,Hidden,Mandatory, optional SAP Standard field attributes for ME21N and ME51N.
I looking for Configuration settings
Thanks
Venki

Hi ,
All i see is Field Label Reqd.entry Opt. entry Display for ME21N and ME51N
I want to see what SAP Standard Fields are Hidden for these T-codes.
I want to use and Non Used Field ( Hidden SAP Field) for new Enhancement instead of creating a custom Tab
Thanks
Venki

Do you trust the SAP standard rule set ?

Hello all,
I have the impression that, too often, the SAP standard ruleset has been taken for granted : upload, generate and use. Here is a post as to why not to do so. Hopefuly, this will generate a interesting discussion.
As I have previously stated in other threads, you should be very careful accepting the SAP standard rule set without reviewing it first. Before accepting it, you should ensure that your specific SAP environment has been reflected in the functions. The 2 following questions deal with this topic :
1. what is your SAP release ? ---> 46C is different than ECC 6.0 in terms of permissions to be included in the function permission tab. With every SAP release, new authorization objects are linked to SAP standard tcodes. Subsequently some AUTHORITY-CHECK statements have been adapted in the ABAP behind the transaction code. So, other authorizations need to provided from an implementation point of view (PFCG). And thus, from an audit perspective (GRC-CC), other settings are due when filtering users' access rights in search for who can do what in SAP.
2. what are your customizing settings and master data settings ? --> depending on these answers you will have to (de)activate certain permissions in your functions. Eg. are authorization groups for posting periods, business areas, material types, ... being used ? If this is not required in the SAP system and if activated in SAP GRC function, then you filter down your results too hard, thereby leaving certain users out of the audit report while in reality they can actually execute the corresponding SAP functionality --> risk for false negatives !
Do not forget that the SAP standard ruleset is only an import of SU24 settings of - probably - a Walldorf system. That's the reason SAP states that the delivered rule set is a starting point.
So, the best practice is :
a. collect SAP specific settings per connector in a separate 'questionnaire' document, preferably structured in a database
b. reflect these answers per function per connector per action per permission by correctly (de)activating the corresponding permissions for all affected functions
You can imagine that this is a time-consuming process due to the amount of work and the slow interaction with the Java web-based GRC GUI. Therefore, it is a quite cumbersome and at times error-prone activity ...... That is, in case you would decide to implement your questionnaire answers manually. There are of course software providers on the market that can develop and maintain your functions in an off-line application and generate your rule set so that you can upload it directly in SAP GRC. In this example such software providers are particularly interesting, because your questionnaire answers are structurally stored and reflected in the functions. Any change now or in the future can be mass-reflected in all (hundreds / thousands of) corresponding permissions in the functions. Time-saving and consistent !
Is this questionnaire really necessary ? Can't I just activate all permissions in every function ? Certainly not, because that would - and here is the main problem - filter too much users out of your audit results because the filter is too stringent. This practice would lead too false negatives, something that auditors do not like.
Can't I just update all my functions based on my particular SU24 settings ? (by the way, if you don't know what SU24 settings are, than ask your role administrator. He/she should know. ) Yes, if you think they are on target, yes you can by deleting all VIRSA_CC_FUNCPRM entries from the Rules.txt export of the SAP standard rule set, re-upload, go for every function into change mode so that the new permissions are imported based on your SU24 settings. Also, very cumbersome and with the absolute condition that you SU24 are maintained excellent.
Why is that so important ? Imagine F_BKPF_GSB the auth object to check on auth groups on business areas within accounting documents. Most role administrator will leave this object on Check/Maintain in the SU24 settings. This means that the object will be imported in the role when - for example - FB01 has been added in the menu. But the role administrator inactivates the object in the role. Still no problem, because user doesn't need it, since auth groups on business areas are not being used. However, having this SU24 will result in an activated F_BKPF_GSB permission in your GRC function. So, SAP GRC will filter down on those users who have F_BKPF_GSB, which will lead to false negatives.
Haven't you noticed that SAP has deactivated quite a lot of permissions, including F_BKPF_GSB ? Now, you see why. But they go too far at times and even incorrect. Example : go ahead and look deeper into function AP02. There, you will see for FB01 that two permissions have been activated. F_BKPF_BEK and F_BKPF_KOA. The very basic authorizations needed to be able to post FI document are F_BKPF_BUK and F_BKPF_KOA. That's F_BKPF_BUK .... not F_BKPF_BEK. They have made a mistake here. F_BKPF_BEK is an optional auth object (as with F_BKPF_GSB) to check on vendor account auth groups.
Again, the message is : be very critical when looking at the SAP standard rule set. So, test thoroughly. And if your not sure, leave the job to a specialized firm.
Success !
Sam

Sam and everyone,
Sam brings up some good points on the delivered ruleset. Please keep in mind; however, that SAP has always stated that the delivered ruleset is a starting point. This is brought up in sap note 986996     Best Practice for SAP CC Rules and Risks. I completely agree with him that no company should just use the supplied rules without doing a full evaluation of their risk and control environment.
I'll try to address each area that Sam brings up:
1. Regarding the issue with differences of auth objects between versions, the SAP delivered rulset is not meant to be version specific. We therefore provide rules with the lowest common denominator when it comes to auth object settings.
The rules were created on a 4.6c system, with the exception of transactions that only exist in higher versions.
The underlying assumption is that we want to ensure the rules do not have any false negatives. This means that we purposely activate the fewest auth objects required in order to execute the transaction.
If new or different auth object settings come into play in the higher releases and you feel this results in false positives (conflicts that show that don't really exist), then you can adjust the rules to add these auth objects to the rules.
Again, our assumption is that the delivered ruleset should err on the side of showing too many conflicts which can be further filtered by the customer, versus excluding users that should be reported.
2. For the customizing settings, as per above, we strive to deliver rules that are base level rules that are applicable for everyone. This is why we deliver only the core auth objects in our rules and not all. A example is ME21N.
If you look at SU24 in an ECC6 system, ME21N has 4 auth objects set as check/maintain. However, in the rules we only enable one of the object, M_BEST_BSA. This is to prevent false negatives.
3. Sam is absolutely right that the delivered auth object settings for FB01 have a mistake. The correct auth object should be F_BKPF_BUK and not F_BKPF_BEK. This was a manual error on my part. I've added this to a listing to correct in future versions of the rules.
4. Since late 2006, 4 updates have been made to the rules to correct known issues as well as expand the ruleset as needed. See the sap notes below as well as posting Compliance Calibrator - Q2 2008 Rule Update from July 22.
1083611 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q3 2007
1061380 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q2 2006
1035070 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q1 2007
1173980 Risk Analysis and Remediation Rule Update Q2 2008
5. SAP is constantly working to improve our rulesets as we know there are areas where the rules can be improved. See my earlier post called Request for participants for an Access Control Rule mini-council from January 28, 2008. A rule mini-council is in place and I welcome anyone who is interested in joining to contact me at the information provided in that post.
6. Finally, the document on the BPX location below has a good overview of how companies should review the rules and customize them to their control and risk environment:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/bpx-grc
Under Key Topics - Access Control; choose document below:
    o GRC Access Control - Access Risk Management Guide   (PDF 268 KB)
The access risk management guide helps you set up and implement risk
identification and remediation with GRC Access Control.

Best practice for deletion of SAP standard configuration

Does anyone have any documentation related to deletion of standard SAP configuration? My client is requesting deletion of all the standard delivered company codes and I believe it is best practice to never delete them. I am looking for supporting documentation that supports this.

Rhonda,
I have never seen a system where the standard delivered company codes did not exist, so I can't say what the implications of deletion are. I suppose it is possible to do....
For documentation, I guess you could search through service.sap.com/support.
I would think you would respond to the request as follows:
Tell the client it will be extra work to delete the items. Which will translate into additional billable fees.
Tell the client (in writing) that you cannot predict what all possible outcomes will be, but that you are willing to work with him to fix anything that gets broken in the process. For additional billable fees.
In the end, the client is paying for your advice and your services. In the end, he owns the license and the system upon which it is running. He can have anything he wants, there is no other 'right' or 'wrong'.
I suggest you don't delete anything in client 000. Most companies keep this as a reference. If the client later decides to reconstruct, this would be a nice source of info.
Since company codes greatly affect FI/CO, you might want to post the question in one of those forums.
Best Regards,
DB49

1099 Misc reporting for US in SAP Standard report not containing any value

HI All,
In my current clients requirement is to get the SAP Standard reprort for 1099 Misc reporting for US
1) Accordingly i have done configuration for Withholding tax for US with tax type FE
2) There are 14 WHT Tax codes under FE , like 01 = Rent , 02 = royalty, 03 = other income etc.
3) Assigned Tax type with Co. Code
4) Activated WHT tax at Co. code
5) Created WHT country US
And also assign WHT tax type FE and respective tax code to vendors in Accounting info in Vendor Master
Posted couple of vendor invoices and made payment for those also
Then after this when i run the SAP Standard report for 1099 Misc reporting for US , then the output contains with no data.. but only contains vedor names and WHT tax code which i have assigned..
I think i have missed some configuration may be . Can any one let me know the detail step by step config and process how to get proper out put in 1099 Misc reporting for US in Standard reporting..
Regards,
Sandip

Hello auroar,
I followed the path that you provided and that lead me to this part of the tree: Define File Format for Withholding Tax Reporting...This is where I found the information that I needed.
Thank you very much.
-Patrick
Edited by: Patrick Smith on Oct 22, 2009 8:41 PM

Use of Adjust function to copy standard config for Upgraded system

I have worked on a number of different ERP 6 systems that have been upgraded from previous versions.
Some of the basic standard delivered config will be missing and there is a simple task of using the "adjust" function to copy the standard config from client "001" to the developement client "XXX"
However I know have a client who has the missing config in the dev client "XXX" but when you use the adjust back to "001" there is nothing there.
Do you know a way to re-create the core config?
An example is in Dispute Management - if you go to the case type config. SAP delivers F_DM as a base - but there is nothing there.
thanks

Try to copy from client "000"

Sap standard report for delivery document block.

Hi,
We want to block delivery document for further processing that picking and PGI.
For that we are looking for sap standard report if available so we could provide it to client.
so we need
SAP standard report for blocked delivery document.

Hi,
As far as my understanding there is no such report but you can try with report MATERIAL WHERE USED LIST
Please find t-code for this as due to system unavailable i am not mentioning t-code for same
kapil

O/P format info req for an SAP standard reprot.---urget???

Hi
I need to change the O/P display format for the tocde IH01,its an SAP-standard report for PM,but displays the O/P in an different format,is there any way so that i can make it to ALV,or SAP list format.
I want to save the dat of O/P in an excel,but frm this O/Pi am unable to save the data in my way,it coming in an jumble way,so it will be only done if its displyed in SAP List or ALV,can tell me anyone,will this optoon is possible in this or not.
Regrds

Hi Experts,
I got the same Requirement i have to display the tree structure output of IH01 Transaction into ALV grid display .

SAP standard example to get start with Webdynpro for ABAP

Hi,
I just started learning Webdynpro for ABAP.
I'm looking for SAP standard buit in applilcation example which explains all the the view controls, properties and Layout desining.
please let me know the standard applications of SAP for learning.
Many Thanks,
Gupta

hi..
just go to package SWDP_DEMO, it has all sample webdynpro applications using all UI elements.
By the way...question is posted in wrong forum
Regards
Manas Dua

Brazil - SAP Standard Delivered Rule / Config for R/3 ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for