Browser for low-end laptop

Hi,
my girlfriends laptop is running arch linux (I installed it for her a year ago...). The problem is that it's not a high performance machine but rather low-end instead. It's an "Acer Extensa 5635Z" (Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200, Intel GMA, 2 gig ram, some kind of slow laptop hdd...). All she does on this machine is browsing the web (facebook, last.fm, simfy.de) and listening to music. Occasionally she may rip some audio cds and stuff... The only process that literally kills the machine is firefox and/or flash. She tends to open around 30 - 90 tabs with all kinds of facebook stuff where it seems to be the case that everyone is posting stupid youtube "links" all the time. She needs that many tabs for all the stuff she plans to review. This means she treats "tabs" as some kind of "to read" shelf. I have tried to get here to use bookmarks but this feels to "clumsy" for her and she says she would "forget" about stuff when its not "opened".
This situation will not get better. So I'm desperately in search of a very light browser that may enable her to handle the load she produces. Can't use chromium because it has no "search bar" and I'm not getting here to put search terms into the location bar. We tried midori but it died a segfault death soon after...
The desktop environment we're using is xfce at the moment. I could go as low as fluxbox but I fear that won't improve much. Any ideas?

I have a much low end computer (4 years old computer 1.2 Gb RAM Celeron M 1.6 Ghz processor). Your laptop is powerful to run the browser of your choice (choosing a different one would not make a real difference). I now prefer google chrome (I use the open source version chromium): it seems more responsive than Firefox (you can search in the address bar, I do not see the problem). The performance problems most probably comes from flash animations and javascript. If you use Firefox, I suggest to install flasblock (block all flash animation unless clicked, possibility to whitelist some domain). For javascript, some sites may be a processor hog. Install the yesscript extension: it enable javascript by default but allow to stop it by clicking on an icon. I suggest you to install a CPU monitor, so you can easily identify which tabs pose problems and block javascript/flash inside them.
Now 30-90 tabs is a lot. It might still work by making sure javascript/Flash are blocked in all but one tab. But maybe it would be better to proceed differently. Putting bookmarks on the bookmark bar seems a good idea. It seems that it make little difference for the user: you see the sites in the bookmark bar instead of the tab bar. Only one tab is open at once anyway.
Last edited by olive (2011-07-19 20:15:38)

Similar Messages

Introducing Lowarch - Arch for low-end systems

Some of you might remember that I mentioned my plans of making an Arch install cd for low end systems. I've come quite far with this project now.
First, I must say that it was a lot harder than I first expected. So I can say I have learned a lot in the process.
Second, before I start ramblig about where I am in the process, I'll just outline what the plan is:
The best Linux distribution is Arch Linux, because of it's speed, simplicity and elegance in design. I often get hold of some old laptops which are too old for Arch (i586 normally, but also i486). I have tried a lot of distros made for low end systems, but I always end up thinking, ah how wonderful it would have been to have Arch on this. It would have been the perfect distro for this machine.
And the more I thought about it, I realised that even though Arch is perfect for super modern systems, it would be even more perfect for old systems, because of it's speed and simplicity, and not least the choice of packages.
Some have started projects to port Arch to i586. I don't think that is the best solution. A lot of Arch isn't really useful on these machines. Therefore I decided to make a new distro based on Arch, where the main difference is the choice of packages. You don't want to run a video editor on a i586. For now I've called the distro Lowarch.
Here's what I have done so far:
1st try:
Oh, I just change the compiler flags to i486 in /etc/makepkg.conf and start compiling all the packages. That worked great. Almost everything in base compiled fine. Until I started to notice the strange i686's coming up in all the ./configure outputs, and when I tried to install some of it on my i586, a lot of Illegal instruction messages came up.
After doing some research, I understood that some programs make static links to libraries, all of which, of course, are i686 coded on my system. I realised I needed to do this differently. Of course I didn't want to do all the compiling on a 486 machine.
2nd try:
I made a Cross Linux From Scratch system, compiled for i486. Even that I had to make twice, for a lot of programs check what processor they are running on and compile for that. So the second time I used a so-called uname-hack. A small kernel module which makes the kernel report that it's running on an i486 machine.
When I had a basic build system, I compiled pacman, and started to build packages. This time I had to take care of the order for dependencies to work out. First kernel-headers, glibc, etc. I installed one package at a time into an empty directory with the pacman -r option.
After having the base system compiled, I booted it, and (using the uname-hack still) continued to compile the other packages in current, and the ones that I wanted from extra.
It was really hard, since a lot of packages just don't compile with recent glibc and gcc. I have learned a lot about writing small patches just to make gcc happy or take away symbols not used anymore etc. The dependencies in the pkgbuilds are not always correct when it comes to building packages. Sometimes, and this is the most frustrating, packages seems to build correctly, but because some library wasn't installed or whatever, a few files are missing from the package, and I have no way to know, untill something goes wrong. Often this wrong is a package not compiling because include files are missing.
Another problem was to make an installer. I decided I just wanted a simple installer, like Arch has. So I compiled busybox and made an almost exact copy of the 0.7.2 install cd, just compiled for i486, and with my package selection on it.
What's left to do:
1. Look more closely at the package selection. If there are people who are interested in this we can have some nice discussions about this. There are a lot of packages I just don't know what is for, and therefore I don't dare take them away.
2. Clean up the PKGBUILDs, e.g take away references it the i686 and 64bit arch.
3. Compile the whole set of packages again, just in case.
4. Releasing it.
I've set up a wordpress page at lowarch.linuxophic.org, which is empty now, but where I'll put out a link to the iso when it's ready.

Yes, I think it would be smart to check out the PKGBUILD once in a while and see if they are still able to build packages. It seems this is only done when new releases arrive.
The thing about old programs not compiling with newer glibc and gcc or other libraries is unavoidable, and there's an unending stream of patches to address this issue. If a package hasn't had a release for a year, it's quite common that a change in a library it depends on will break the compilation. When or if new releases come, they should usually fix this.
Of course, PKGBUILDs of current packages should work with a current system, not with a system from last year, if their supposed to be of any use. But it's a huge job to keep this up to date at all times, and you need some programming skills to do it, and I would rather have the devs focus on more important things, like updating packages and making everything work even better.

How to better improve the playback efficiency of HD videos on Premiere Pro CC for low-end computers?

Title explains it all really!
The playback of selected files on the upper left and right box are glitchy and slow when playing back, which makes it near impossible (or just really frustrating) to properly sync with other video clips and audio.
On lower-end video editing programs, the solution I made for this was applying Speed Change effect, but not adjusting the speed by keeping it at 100.
Details of my computer are : AMD E-350 Processor; 1.60 GHz, 3 GB RAM, Windows Vista 64bit
Thanks in advance

Win7 64bit will use almost all of your 3Gig of ram to load, leaving almost nothing to run PPro
You need to buy or build a better computer
Buy a Desktop Video Editing PC
-http://www.adkvideoediting.com/
-http://www.sharbor.com/
Here Build a Desktop Video Editing PC
-3 price level ideas in http://www.pacifier.com/~jtsmith/ADOBE.HTM
-http://ppbm7.com/index.php/tweakers-page
-what PC to build http://forums.adobe.com/thread/947698
-2 how to build videos http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1104182
-another video http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1145366
-another video http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1132363
-planning & Building http://ppbm7.com/index.php/intro-part-1
-memory for LGA2011 http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1098759
-an Adobe FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/thread/878520
-http://www.shawnlam.ca/2012/premiere-pro-cs6-video-editing-computer-build/
-http://www.videoguys.com/Guide/E/Videoguys+DIY9+Its+Time+for+Sandy+Bridge+E/0xe9b142f408a2 b03ab88144a434e88de7.aspx
-several more links http://forums.adobe.com/thread/815798
-build tuning http://ppbm7.com/index.php/final-results
-http://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Adobe-Premiere-Pro-CC-Professional-GPU-Accelerat ion-502/

Adobe Reader for Low End PCs.

Hello, I'm an air ambulance pilot and I'm donating several desktop pcs to a rural school in a mountainous province in the Philippines. I bought them by bulk in Hong Kong and some of them are low end. I was wondering what version of adobe reader works well with low end pcs? The latest versions make the low end pcs crawl in performance. The pcs are using windows xp os.

Consider other PDF readers. I recommend the free Foxit Reader for old computers it's small and fast and doesn't carry all the garbage and vulnerabilities of the Adobe software.
http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/reader/

Is there any LIGHT (low memory) version of Firefox available for low end android deviced?

There is always a low memory version of almost every browser. Opera has both "Opera Classic" and "Opera Mini", UC Browser has both "UC Browser" and "UC Browser Mini". These Mini-s run very fluently on Low end devies. Takes less RAM (Though they always fail to load pages with better HTML coding) and almost never lags. I want that Firefox also either make their RAM Usage less or release a mini version. Otherwise, like UC Browser, they also should make the Cache storage to SDCARD by default.

We want to release a browser with roughly the same capabilities as the Desktop version of Firefox. Creating a low feature version of Firefox would only confuse web developers as to what features Firefox on Android has.

Can you realise firefox mobile for low-end android devices like Samsung GT-I5700 Galaxy Spica?

Now the realised version of Firefox doesn't work on low-end Android devices.

Probably not. The ARMv6 version was very unstable, and always crashed, according to the knowledge base.
(https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Platforms/Android)

Editing in lower res for lower end hardware?

Hi guys
I just got done shooting 6hrs of footage of an event with the XH-A1. It was the first time I'd ever shot in HD and I'm finding that my laptop can't handle it. In premiere it's pausing and skipping, etc.
I have captured the video from the XH-A1 with HDSplit. The resulting files are .M2T Is there a way to somehow convert the clips I need into a lower res for editing, but then when I come to encode the result, it uses the full HD files?

ok thanks, this is starting to make sense now. One point. I converted some files to h.264 MP4 files. It appears that I can't add meta data to these mp4 files and indeed I may not be able to edit them in Premiere? Is that right? (I'm away from my PC at the moment, so can't check it).
If this is true and I can not edit h.264, then what should I convert to? Can I down sample the HDV M2T files to a SD format without loosing too much of the quality (over and above the obvious differences between HDV and SDV

Is it true that I will not be able to update my browser for my g4 laptop?

I would like to know if apple is not letting users upgrade their safari browsers on older powermac g4 laptops?

Many PowerPC users are moving to Ten Four Fox:
http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/
It uses technology from more recent versions of FireFox that only run on Intel Macs but ports them to run on 10.4 and 10.5 PPCs.
By default, plug-ins are disabled. However, you can use these instreuctions:
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1226744
to activate plug-ins and use Flash.
As many web technologies are no long optimized for the PowerPC, even 10-4-Fox can't restore neck-snapping speed, but the compatibility with modern sites is quite good.

Sh led also on low end routers

Hello all,
If I remember correctly it was possible to lit up led's on a GSR router...(12k) through the cli remotely....
Here comes perhaps a strange or odd request for lower end type of routers (and possible also switches)
Would it be possible to have a command in the Cisco IOS, to light up any light emitting diode’s in a certain fashion? So field engineers know for sure they are hitting the right spot when they are looking for equipment in particular area’s?
Cheers

Hello all,
If I remember correctly it was possible to lit up led's on a GSR router...(12k) through the cli remotely....
Here comes perhaps a strange or odd request for lower end type of routers (and possible also switches)
Would
it be possible to have a command in the Cisco IOS, to light up any
light emitting diode’s in a certain fashion? So field engineers know
for sure they are hitting the right spot when they are looking for
equipment in particular area’s?
Cheers
Hi,
Yes you are right Show led is used to display the current status of all line card Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs), use the show led EXEC command. show led [slot-number] but this command was introduced in realease 11.2(09)GSbut in small end routers you can usethe following commands to display and verify the hardware features, enter the following commands:
•show version—Displays the system hardware version; the installed software version; the names and sources of configuration files; the boot images; and the amount of installed DRAM, NVRAM, and flash memory.
•show diag—Lists and displays diagnostic information about the installed controllers, interface processors, and port adapters; typical examples are network modules, interface cards (VICs, WICs, HWICs), and advanced integration modules (AIMs).
Hope to help
Ganesh.H

IOS 7 doesn't work on iPod touch 4g, so does the mean its the end for this device? Or are they going to make updates specially for lower devices an apps that are compatible ??

iOS 7 doesn't work on iPod touch 4g, so does the mean its the end for this device? Or are they going to make updates specially for lower devices an apps that are compatible ??

Which apps remain compatible will be up to the individual developers who sell those apps. There will be no further iOS updates, but those aren't really necessary to continue to use and enjoy your device. I still have an iPad 1 running on iOS 5, and it is fully functional.
The App Store has an app called VintApps 3.1.1 that is specifically geared toward iOS 3.1, however, you would probably be able to run most of those apps on your iPod, and considering that there will be a rather large market for iOS 6 apps users, it is not likely that you will see a significant reduction in choices any time soon.
It is not the end for the device in any sense except that it is at it's ultimate iOS level. And again, I have an iPad that is at it's ultimate iOS level (iOS 5), and I get new apps all the time that work for both my iPad and my iPhone that runs iOS 6.1.1
No need to fret....
Cheers,
GB

ADF Faces or APEX for a lightweight browser-based front end.

I'm tasked with prototyping a lightweight browser based front end to display consolidated customer information. It needs to be callable from half a dozen disparate and mostly non-Oracle applications. The idea is that each application will have a button that can kick off a browser session to see a data-warehouse sourced view of a customer. Forms10g (where my experience lies) seems too resource heavy for the constant opening/closing of this little application but APEX looks like a good fit with not too steep a learning curve and the guys on the forum thuoght it was well suited. ADF Faces seems to have a steep learning curve given that I don't have any Java experience but a small view-only app like this might be a good place to gain experience useful for more complex apps. My question is whether ADF Faces is a goot fit for this sort of task. If anyone has used ADF Faces and APEX I'd be very grateful for their thoughts.

Thanks for those pointers Grant.
Just a couple of further questions. As a company we're stuck on Internet Explorer 5.5 for another 18 months or so (>5,000desktops!). Does that exclude ADF Faces as an option given the prune-faced geriatric nature of the browser we're using (we're also on NT4.0 :-) Also, they're likely to be in and out of this screen like a fiddler's elbow and I'm wondering if the start-up effort using ADF Faces is likely to be significantly more resource intensive than an APEX equivalent.
My background is Oracle*Forms (since 2.0) and it would be nice to make a start on a technology that could be used in place of Forms in more complex apps - I just need to be able to justify the likely increased costs to people focused predominantly on this project's costs.

Need new low-end graphics card for Power Mac G5 (PowerPC 970)

My Power Mac G5 (PowerPC 970) has recently died I believe due to a bad
ATI RADEON X800 XT MAC EDITION video card.
Reason for thinking its the card, is that the machine was performing its intended tasks for several days even though the monitor was snow.
Having trouble determining a low-end replacement. (I no longer need the enhanced features of the RADEON X800 for this machine.
Much appreciated if someone could suggest a product appropriate for PowerPC 970.
Thanks!

I also ran into this issue with my dual G5. When I bought it, I didn't get wireless because it was a dedicated desktop on the network, but I'm upgrading and giving it to the kids to use in a room without wired network. Now that wireless would be really nice and it looks like the official solution is:
"Apple Wireless Upgrade Kit for Power Mac G5 Dual or Power Mac G5 Quad MA252G/A"
which is really expensive and difficult to install. But the weird thing is that I do have bluetooth. I wonder if there's just some little doodad I need to connect to get wireless going too, but I can't find any info on the card, and it looks like it's buried on the motherboard behind all the cooling stuff. I'll probably just spring for one of the USB solutions.

Footer art is not ending with the browser's lower horizontal edge

Footer art is not ending with the browser's lower horizontal edge, there's a gap. How do I force my footer art to butt up against the bottom of the browser window? See sites below, scroll down and the dark area does not reach the end of the browser. This is despite the fact that I dragged the edges of the art down until the red line appeared.
www.masoretinstitute.com
www.nydesign.com

Footer art is not ending with the browser's lower horizontal edge, there's a gap. How do I force my footer art to butt up against the bottom of the browser window? See sites below, scroll down and the dark area does not reach the end of the browser. This is despite the fact that I dragged the edges of the art down until the red line appeared.
www.masoretinstitute.com
www.nydesign.com

SOME Windows machines can't browse for Mac printers

I have a Mac mini with an HP 5940 attached to it. I also have three Windows machines hanging around: my laptop, my wife's laptop, and my wife's desktop. My laptop and my wife's desktop are running XP Pro SP2. My wife's laptop is running XP Media Center Edition SP2. My mini is running 10.5.3.
My laptop has no difficulty with the printer. It can print all day long, browse for the printer, anything I want to do.
My wife's machines cannot. They cannot browse for the printer (browsing ends at the computer entry for the Macintosh). They had a previously set up print queue (evidently this did work before), but cannot print using it; documents pile up on the PC.
If I create a new printer on my wife's machine and enter the \\machine\queue stuff manually, I am prompted for a username and password for the connection. Entering my Mac short username and password allows me to print from her machines, until they reboot. Upon reboot, the print queue no longer works; documents pile up at the PC, etc.
I can see no difference in the way the print queues are set up on all of the machines.
I do not know why my laptop can browse the Mac's printers while my wife's cannot.
I do not know why my wife's machines require a username and password in order to connect to the printer, while mine does not.
I do not know how to enter a username and password for my wife's printers upon rebooting without deleting and recreating the printer. Which means I have to type the lengthy \\machine\queue stuff again, because browsing doesn't work.
Any ideas?

And I have now fired up the desktop PC I retired when I installed this Mac mini.
Like my laptop, it has no trouble browsing the printers on the Mac or printing to them.
So, I have a total of 5 machines trying to print over the network to the Mac:
- My laptop PC works
- My desktop PC works
- My NetBSD box works
- My wife's laptop PC *does not* work
- My wife's desktop PC *does not* work
I don't know how the Mac can tell whether a machine is mine or my wife's so it knows whether or not to work...

Alternative Browser for Safari?

On my laptop I have IE 5.2.3 which has been on the machine since I got it. I only use it when I run into those sites that don't work on Safari. On my imac IE was not provided so I downloaded Firefox 1.0.7 which again I only use on sites not compatible with Safari maybe 2 or 3 times a month at most.
I'm aware that there is a Firefox version 1.5 available and my question is whether I should bother downloading this or just stick with the original? Again I only need another browser for those occassional sites.
Thanks for any advice,
John

There are a lot of topics here that discuss which browser is the best one for OS X. My conclusion after using 90% of them and in reading other people's comments is that there is no clear winner. There are almost a dozen very good to excellent browsers for OS X and most of them have users who insist that the one they are using is the best.
There is one clear looser: IE/Mac. Microsoft abandoned development 3 years ago, they ended support at the end of last month, and they will end distribution at the end of this month. It is way behind the times in features.
This topic does not really have much discussion, but I provide a couple links to topics which do have fuller debate.
You can get a sense from the discussions of which browsers you might like to try. My suggestion is to try one for a while, then try another for a while. You can keep the ones you like and you can delete the others. Also, with OS X you can have multiple browsers open at the same time, so you can have two different browsers open so you can go to the same sites in each to compare them. I often have five or six browsers open at once when I am testing web sites.
The major browsers are Camino, Firefox, Opera, OmniWeb, iCab, and Mozilla. Note that Mozilla and its cousin Netscape are both Internet suites that include email, a web-page editor, IRC client, and News reader. Unless you need the full suite, you do not need these programs. Also, Firefox is not a native Cocoa app, so it does not take full advantage of OS X, but many people still use it as their default browser.
Finally, many people keep at least two browsers on hand for times when a web site will work in one and not the other.

Browser for low-end laptop

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for