Business Area not visible to account with admin privileges

Hello,
I've encountered the following scenario on visiting a client site:
A Business area has been created by the EUL owner account (IFL) and he has granted admin privileges to another account (BRIANB who has been granted the DBA role). However, when BRIANB logs onto DIscoverer Admin, the Business area in question is not visible. BRIANB is able to create a new business area in the EUL which includes folders that are part of the 'invisible' BA. BRIANB is not able to access the 'invisible' BA using Discoverer End User. I'd be very grateful if anyone out there has an explantion for this,
regards,
KEvin.

Problem solved. My client inadvertently created an additional EUL when initially logging onto Disco Admin as BRIANB. Thereafter this was the default EUL. The errant EUL has now been deleted the required BA's are now in view,
Kevin.

Similar Messages

Using Business Area and Profit Center Accounting with New GL functionality

Hello,
We are Public Sector and using ECC 6.0, we have been using Business Area with Fund Management. We also use Special Purpose Ledger with Document splitting. Before migrating to New GL functionality, we want to understand
-     The possibility of using both Business Area and Profit Center Accounting, and the impact on the system
-     If we activate Profit Center Accounting before migration, how will it work with the splitting process?
-     If we migrate without Profit Center Accounting, will this cause the activation of Profit center accounting later to be more complicated, even if we migrate again?
Thanking you

Hi Sachin,
Thank you for the reply, we want to know that
-     The possibility of using both Business Area and Profit Center Accounting, and the impact on the system
If we decide using Profit Center Accounting with Business Area with New GL functionality how we should do it
-     should we activate classical Profit Center Accounting before migrating to New GL functionality, if we do this how will it work with the splitting process?
-     If we migrate to New GL functionality without Profit Center Accounting, will this cause the activation of Profit center accounting later to be more complicated, even if we migrate again?
Thanking you
Tipu Khan

Business Area not populating in Accounting Doc Post Division Change

Hello Friends,
Platofrm: SAP R/3
We created a new Divisions (06) and assigned them to the Material in Plant 155. A new business arae (PTIC)
was also created and assigned to sales are 0020 00 06.
Later we did couple of assignments (Enter Str>Assig>SD>) where we assigned business area to division - Plant - Sales Org
and Dris Channel ) .
Now to validate the changes I am posting a Sales order in sales area 0020 00 10 - to see whether the newly created business area is getting populated or not. Post sales order - delivery- goods issue and _accounting doc - in the accounting document
I dont see the business arae PTIC. Old business area (PTI) is getting populated.
I wanted to know whether Material is controlling the business area in accounting doc and where I am missing the link.
Our aim is to see business area PTIC in final accounting document so that we are sure that the material - whom we assigned division -06 is giving business are ptic.
Please assist and provide suggestions.
George

Hi,
Go to SPRO > Enterprise Controlling > Consolidation > Integration: Preparation for Consolidation > Preparation in the Sender System > Further Settings for Business Area Consolidations > Sales and Distribution
And check the below settings:-
- Assign Rules per Sales Area
- Assign Business Area per Plant and Division
- Assign Business Area per Sales Area
Regards,
SDNer

Business area not appearing in Accounting document of 543's materail doc

Hello ,
We have created new plant CN06 (and assigend to Company code CN06) by copying existing plant CN03 (assigned to Company code CN03). Business area CN06 was defined and assigned to plant CN06 and valuation area. When we do normal GR document business area appears in material document but when we are doing GR for sub contracting (posting key 81) with movement type 543 Business area doesnt appear in the material doc .
In cancellation of Subcontracting material document for plant CN06(Movement type 544) Business area appears properly . We are unable to analyse the issue.
We have checked field status through RM07CUFA program , there wn't be any mismatch. Please required your help.
Regards
Mahesh Naik

Hello ,
We have checked
please check the for the sales area have u assigned rule (2 or 1) or not in t-code OVF2.----- Rule assigned is -1
please check business area is assigned to plant & division in t-code OVF0----correct assignment is there
please check assignment of business area to sales area OVF1.--correct assignment is there .
Still we are facing problem.
Regards
Mahesh Naik

Business Area Not visible at document display

Dear All,
I have confi. document spllitting. Posted documents with busines area and profit centre.
But at document display business area filed is not appearing.
Only Profit Centre is appearing
Please let me know wht is the problem.
Regards
Partha

Please let me what are the PCA reports??????
Regards
Partha

Few folders in Business area not visible in Desktop edition

I am using Discoverer 4 on Windows NT. I created a new business area using Administrative edition. When I used Desktop edition to create a new workbook, in Step 2, when I selected the new business area I created, the folders (tables) in this business area are listed in the Available list. A few of the folders that are shown in the Administrative edition are not shown in the Available List in the Desktop edition. Are there specific conditions for a folder to be listed in the Available list of the Desktop edition?
Please reply to [email protected]
Thanks.

I had a similar problem. What you might want to try is to Refresh the business area in the Admin edition. That should work.
I am using Discoverer 4 on Windows NT. I created a new business area using Administrative edition. When I used Desktop edition to create a new workbook, in Step 2, when I selected the new business area I created, the folders (tables) in this business area are listed in the Available list. A few of the folders that are shown in the Administrative edition are not shown in the Available List in the Desktop edition. Are there specific conditions for a folder to be listed in the Available list of the Desktop edition?
Please reply to [email protected]
Thanks.

Business area not populated in Accounting Document

Gurus
Business Area showing in Billing document, item detail tab but not populated in Accounting Document BSEG/GSBER.
We have upgraded 4.5b to ECC6.
regards
imdad

Hi:
This happens in instances if one invoice contains multiple business areas, then only blank space will appear in accounting document for business areas. If this is the case then invoice split should happen based on business area. Invoice split can be done through VOFM data transfer - billing document.
However if invoice contains only one Business Area then please check in IMG --> Sales and Distribution --> Basic Function --> Account Assignment / costing --> Business Area Account Assignment....check whether you have assigned the Business Area to Sales Area to Rule "1".
Regards

Profiles are not taken into account with DIS

Hi,
I created several profiles in the content management.
They work correctly.
Now, I have to use Desktop Integration Suite.
The installation worked correctly.
The problem is, when a user saves and closes the document, the "check-in" screen is the standard one.
So, all the metadata are displayed on the screen (nearly 40 - it is becoming a mess for the users to known which ones to fill).
I would like to use the profiles to reduce the metadata (as it is done for the check-in and search in the content server).
How can I do it ?
Does anybody encounter this problem ?
Any help is welcome.
Kind regards
Pierre

Hi Jason,
I understood my mistake (but I installed the patch).
The profile is correctly taken into account.
But the trigger of my profile is the document type.
With the DIS, I don't know how to transfer metadata before to open the "standard check-in" page.
Once the check-in page is opened, if I change the document type, the profile is not activated.
Do you know if it is possible :
- To transfer metadata to the content server that could be used to determine the profile, for example by defining properties on the Word document.
- To change of profiles by changing the value of the trigger used for the profile.
For the moment, the only trick I've found was to create a "server" by value of the trigger and to put the document type as a data to be remembered.
At that moment, the profile is correctly loaded.
But, this solution is not very user-friendy. Do you see another one ?
Pierre

Several user accounts with admin privileges.

When I try to open a different adim account in the user folder, it says I don't have permission. How can I open the other user account?

You can't, in the Finder. The only thing special about an Admin account is you can temporarily elevate your privileges to perform certain tasks. That does not include viewing other user's home.
You can access it from the Terminal.

In Business Rule child elements of Unbounded element are not visible.

Hi All,
Jdev version 11.1.1.7.0
I am facing one issue in Business Rule...
Scenario: I am creating Approval Service (BPEL) with Human Work flow and Bunises Rule.
I am assingning participant in HW by using Rule based(Connecting HW and BR).
Problem here is:
Shema has "unbounded" element.
<element name="ExpenseItem" maxOccurs="unbounded">
     <complexType>
      <sequence>
       <element name="ItemID" type="string"/>
       <element name="ItemName" type="string"/>
       <element name="ItemPrpjectID" type="string"/>
       <element name="ItemStatus" type="string"/>
      </sequence>
     </complexType>
    </element>
Whenever I create Busines rules to configure rules.
While configuring rules child elements of ExpenseItem are not visible. But those are neccesary to configure rules.
If you can help to me resolve would help.
Is it a bedault behaviour of BR? If so how can i acheive this?
Thanks,
Santosh

Solution found:
Click on RuleSet which you have created.
Expand Rule inside it.
Enable Advanced mode and Tree mode and click OK.
Select Root as Task and click on insert pattren and create pattren which is based on unbounded element (here its meant as fact)
Once you create pattren , will be able access elements under unbounded element for Business rule configuration.

Business area not appearing against VAT entry in Accounting doc for Invoice

Dear All,
We have configured Business areas,
When we post an invoice with multiple line items and open the Accounting document for this invoice we find that Business area is visible against Freight Amount and the ,Sales A/c but that no business area is appearing against the Vat payable amount in the accounting doc.
Why so?
what should we do so that system determines the business area against the VAT Account also.
Regards,
Avinash Gyale

This could be due to two reasons
1) If one invoice contains multiple business areas, only blank space will appear in accounting document. To avoid this, invoice split should happen based on business area. Invoice split can be done through VOFM data transfer - billing document.
2) If a particular G/L Account is assigned in multiple Business Areas, this problem will come and you need to apply Substitution Exit RGGBS000
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

HT4623 I recently updated my iPhone 5 to iOS 6.1 and lost all of my contacts. My phone was less than 30 days old and I did not have an account with iCloud prior to the back-up. Any way to restore my contacts or are they lost forever?

I recently updated my iPhone 5 to iOS 6.1 and lost all of my contacts. My phone was less than 30 days old and I did not have an account with iCloud prior to the back-up. Any way to restore my contacts or are they lost forever?

I have the exact same problem. I did the update on my iPhone 5 yesterday, opted for the iCloud set up in the update and then it wiped my contacts. They are not on my phone or in the cloud...

Documents are not visible with layoutset AppBulletinBoardExplorer

Hi experts,
I created a km navigation iview with layoutset AppBulletinBoardExplorer. I created a new networklocation on my PC to the portal repository and upload a lot of documents (becasue a multiple upload from the portal is not possible). The documents are not visible in the iview. When Is change the layout set to ConsumerExplorer the documents are visible. A reboot did not help. If the documents are saved from the portal again, they are visible. Another layoutset or to upload file by file is also not an option.
How to solve this problem? .
gr
Joeri

Hi Simon,
thanks for your reply!
1. Have you tried mass upload via explorer into one KM folder then move the documents you uploaded into another area using the standard UI?
I have moved the content via KM content option, but problem still exist.
2. Have you checked the trace files on the portal to see if there is some error being logged that is not showing in the UI, but might give you a clue as to what is going on?
In the log there is a warning: user | ACCESS.ERROR"| /KM path | node_create_child. Everyone has read permissions.
3. Have you raised an support message with SAP?
not yet
4. Have you tried using the Portal Drive rather then just windows explorer? (probably won't make a different as I think it uses webdav anyway)
With the portal drive the same issue :-(.
It's something with the layoutset in combination with upload via webdav or explore. The documents are also available with a search
gr
Joeri

Follow-on documents are not visible in MIRO in TEST server, awsys = PRD300.

Dear Experts ,
The Test Server was refreshed around mid-June 2011 with data of
Production Server. The follow-on documents are not visible for the
invoice documents in MIRO in TEST server due to value in tables
BKPF,RBKP : field : AWSYS = PRD300 .
The newly created Purchase Orders after the refresh, the accounting
documents can be seen for the Goods Receipt (MIGO_GR-display) and
Invoice documents (MIRO).
we had already raised this issue in March & got the feedback from SAP
as shown below.
accordingly we have developed & run the program "zzlogsys2" which
updates the Logsys/Awsys field from PRD300 ( of production server ) to
that of the current server i.e. TST300 as required.
after which the FI documents for the material documents are visible in
MIGO,but follow-on documents are not visible for the invoice documents
in MIRO.
we have Checked notes 781498 and 28958 to see if the logical system is
correctly assigned , where we found that in table RBKP after entering document number, Fiscal Year , the
Field AWSYS is "PRD300" & not "TST300" as it should be. We will take up the activity of updating table RBKP
also as we are currently doing for tables MKPF & BKPF.
But to have clear picture as to what we are doing is correct , pl
advise about the following :
1) Is it a correct process done by our SAP-Basis team , that every time
any Server ( e.g. Test or Quality ) is refreshed with Production server
data, the Field AWSYS in various transaction tables gets value as
"PRD300" which then is required to replaced by running program such as
ZZlogsys.
REPORT ZZLOGSYS.
TABLES: T000, MKPF.
DATA: NEW_SYS LIKE MKPF-AWSYS.
PARAMETER: OLD_SYS LIKE MKPF-AWSYS.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM T000 WHERE MANDT EQ SY-MANDT.
NEW_SYS = T000-LOGSYS.
CHECK NOT NEW_SYS IS INITIAL.
UPDATE MKPF SET AWSYS = NEW_SYS
WHERE AWSYS = OLD_SYS.
WRITE:/ 'Number of updates: ', SY-DBCNT.
2) if the above process is correct & normal , then which are the other
tables in a particular server ,apart from tables MKPF,BKPF,RBKP , which
needs to be updated the value of field "AWSYS" in the same way
replacing value "PRD300".
3) if the process in point no. 1 is not correct , then what is the
correct process that the Basis team can do while refreshing any target
server with production data so that target server retains its value in
Field AWSYS & not showing "PRD300".
With 3 servers TEST,DEV & Quality , recently refreshed with production
server to bring all servers in Sync for a HR patch application, we have
this situation now in all 3 servers .
Thanks in advance ,
Anil Shanbhag

It is appropriate to move this thread from ERP-MM to [Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)|Enterprise Resource Planning (SAP ERP);
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Jul 7, 2011 4:56 PM

Difference between Business area and profit center accounting

Hi Frnds,
Can any body explain about difference between business area and profit center accounting .

Hi
Business area will have many profit centers. For example Vehicle is a business area in a company. Vehicle can be cars and Bikes etc. Here Vehicle is business area and Cars and Bike are profit centers. In broad Vehicle is a profit center. But as it has sub areas those are profit centers. So profit centers cannot be replaced with business area and vice versa. We can replace business area by Profit centre, only condition is that it should be in same controlling area. The business area is more like a business unit of a company. You can have multiple profit centers within a business area.
Main distinguish factor is that distribution and assessment in possible in profit center but not in business area.
One more distinction is that Business area need not be attached to any organisation structure. But profit centres can be created only under the controlling area. Business area can be across controlling area.
Business area concept is used for making stragic decisions by the management whereas the primary purpose of profit centre accounting is responsibility accounting.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/ff/277203deea11d3b5b4006094b9b0a5/frameset.htm

Business Area not visible to account with admin privileges

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for