Business rules in ADF-BC

Hi JHS-team,
I found an Oracle white paper on BR's in ADF dated April 2004. In it are, amongs a lot of other interesting stuff, examples on howto code business rules. These rules usually "raise" an error when it gets violated (for example a change in civil state) by calling a method addUserError(). This method is no longer part of JHeadstart 10.1.2; see the revision history in class AdfbcUtils which says: "removed addUserError methods (not applicable anymore with ADF)".
Now for my question; why is addUserError() no longer applicable with ADF and how should an exception be raised now?
Thanks,
Tim

Tim,
You can find the answer in this post: BusinessRulesInBc4j.pdf
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Similar Messages

Using Business Rules with ADF

I would like to use oracle business rules to handle the business logic in an ADF based application; can anyone advise me where to do this? I am thinking as either a custom service method or in the same way as validation on a view-object. Ultimately i need to work with data from multiple tables so the enitity object level is not really appropriate.

Hi
Does anyone know the answer to this one?
Here is another one: Where in a View Object (that represents a detail record made up of 3 EOs in a Master/detail configuration) during the creation of the View Object would you call out to a Rule so that the Rule could populate a data field in the View Object?
Also, is there a document anywhere that explains how to get ADF and Oracle Business Rules to work together? There is a simplistic example available but I was hoping for more depth and documentation.
Thanks!
Ted

Oracle Business Rules with Fusion Release 4

Hi
I am wondering if we can use the Oracle Business Rules product with the Oracle Fusion Compensation APplication Release 4.
Thanks
Srinivasa Sunchu

Srinivasa,
There are relevant chapters in the Oracle Fusion Middleware User's Guide for Oracle Business Rules. There is sample code interspersed in the chapters.
7 Working with Rules SDK Decision Point API
http://fmwdocs.us.oracle.com/vol/doclibs/fusionapps/review/E36909_01/user.1111/e10228/decision_point.htm#ASRUG455
10 Working with Oracle Business Rules and ADF Business Components
http://fmwdocs.us.oracle.com/vol/doclibs/fusionapps/review/E36909_01/user.1111/e10228/adfbc.htm#ASRUG378
I looked through the source code of one of our products that uses the Rules SDK to see if there is an easy-to-extract example, but it's far beyond the scope of a forum post. We'll probably create one or more blog posts that dive deeper into this topic, but I cannot promise a date for that. Keep an eye on http://blogs.oracle.com/fadevrel please.

Can I ReUse business rule with JHeadStart ?

Hi All,
I am looking for tools and methods for our development team to achieve this goal. The keyword is Re-Use as far as we can, in all application layer.
We will have core application, and for any new customer we will only develope the things that specific to that customer and Re-use the core application.
Will JHeadStart help us to achieve that goal ?
Could anybody pls help me with the scenario for maximum reUse ?
Thank you for your help,
Krist

Krist,
JHeadstart does not 'help' much with your business rule implementation, but it also does not prevent it (I'll get to the bugs you mentioned later). ADF BC is an excellent framework for implementing your business rules, and if you implement these rules on Entity Objects (instead of View Objects) as much as you can, they are highly reusable. Have a look at this paper, which is from the 'before ADF' era but will still contain lots of information on how to implement various types of Business Rules in ADF BC:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/htdocs/bc4j/BusinessRulesInBc4j.pdf
The JHeadstart bugs you mention should not hinder you (much). The first should not reproduce in the latest patch version; you can create your own application module subclass as long as it (directly or indirectly) extends the JHeadstart one.
The bug with respect to View Object extending does not mean the Java class extending of the View Object classes, but rather the situation where one View Object 'inherits' the attribute definitions of another View Object. I would not advice using this type of 'definition inheritance', and furthermore implementing business rules on View Objects should be avoided as much as possible if re-use is your goal; the Entity Objects underneath the View Objects are a much better location.
The bug with imported Entity Object is more a restriction in how you organise your sources in JDeveloper (i.e. spreading your Business Components across multiple projects) than it is a limitation on reusing business logic.
Kind regards,
Peter Ebell
JHeadstart Team

Business Rules:Non-oracle db connections not shown in the ADF-BC Facts sect

Hi everyone
I'm working with Oracle BPM 11.1.1.5.0
JDeverloper: 11.1.1.5.0
Database : SQL Server 2008.
I'm trying to create some rules based on some value in my tables in the database.
The problem:
My non-oracle DB connections are not shown in my Business rule, in the ADF-BC Facts section on the Facts tab.
I have two oracle db connections and one SQL Server connection, and all three have been working perfectly before.
But in the business rules facts section, when I want to add a new ADF-BC fact, only the oracle connections are shown.
I have tried recreating all of them a few times, re registering my sqljdbc jar file, creating a new test application from scratch, but none seems to work.
Can some one give me any hint please?
Thanks in advance

has anyone else had this problem ?

Business Rules with BPEL or ADF

Hi,
My requirement is :
We have to migrate records from one DB table to another DB table.
And we have to apply Business Rules on those records while they are on there journy from source DB to target DB.
We have two choices to achieve this:-
1) Use BPEL process and Tranform Record from Source to Destination by applying Business Rules
Or
2) Develop ADF application and use business rules SDK to fetch the Rules and apply them to Tranfer Data from Source DB to Traget DB.
Can anybody suggest the better approach on this.
Thanks & Regards,
anvv sharma

You may want to provide more information on your use case. The way I read this is that neither product would suite your use case. This looks more like an ETL solution, therefore ODI may be a better play.
Is this a one off exercise?
How big is the payload?
what are the examples of the business rules?
Are the business rules dynamic?
cheers
James

Validate ADF UI field as per Oracle Business Rules

Hi ,
I have a requirement where the relationship between the various data fields are defined in Oracle Business Rule 11g inside BPM Project.I need to call these rules on ADF screens for data population.
Eg, If there are two fields on ADF UI,field1 and fiedl2.
Possible combinations of the two field are:
Field1 Field2
A B
C D
E null
The rules are part of OBPM 11g project as customer can change the rules through composer at run time as per business need.
How can i achieve this requirement.Please help urgent.
Regards...

Hi Daniel
Lets say i have two attribute 'Product Code' and 'Department id'.The relationship between the two attributes is defined in Oracle Business Rule.
eg.
If Product Code is '111' then Department is 'Finance'
If Product Code is '222' then Department is 'Inventory'
The values for each of the attribute is defined in a database
Product Code Table
Value Description
111 SalaryAllowance
222 Current Stock
Department Table
Value Description
Finance Handles Payroll
Inventory Handles Packaging
I am displaying these two attribute on the ADF UI as dropdowns. If I select '111' from the product code dropdown then the value in Department dropdown should automatically be set as 'Finance'.I need to trigger the validation/relationship between the attributes from business rules.
The reason for keeping the relationship in rules is because business wants to change these relationships at run time.
Hope the scenario is clear to you.
Regards...

Business Rules & ADF

Hi,
My requirement is :
I have millions of records to be processed by Oracle Business Rules.
I understand that Oracle Business Rule engine process record by record and we want to use ADF technology to process millions of records at a time with Oracle Business Rules.
Is this possible with ADF to process thousands / millions of records to process at a time and how is the performance ?
we are looking at the following documentation from Oracle
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12839_01/integration.1111/e10228.pdf
thanks & Regards,
anvv sharma

Tim,
You can find the answer in this post: BusinessRulesInBc4j.pdf
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

ADF BC, how implements business rules?

Hi.
I am new in oracles technology. Please help me understand how implements business rules.
For example: I have two tables operation(id,code) and operation_item(id, operation_id, code). I create entities objects for it: OperationEntity, OperationItemEntity and association: OperationItemToOperation. Then create entity-based view object OperationById which have bind parameter id for find operation by id. I also create entity-based view object OperationItem and view link OperationItemToOperationLink.
My ApplicationModule contains OperationById and OperationItem via OperationItemToOperationLink
I want implements "clone" method at OperationById view for current row. This method create copy selected row from operation table and copy all rows from operation_item table where operation_item.operation_id = operation.id.
I add method createCurrentRowClone to OperationById:
public void createCurrentRowClone() {
OperationByIdRowImpl currentRow =
(OperationByIdRowImpl ) getCurrentRow();
OperationByIdRowImpl newRow = (OperationByIdRowImpl ) createRow();
insertRow(newRow);
newRow.setAttributes(currentRow);
//TODO create copy for all rows from OperationItem
//??? how get OperationItem instance
and I add method clone to OperationItem:
public void createClone {
// for all row from OperationItem create clone
but I don't understand how get OperationItem instance in OperationById scope. I have method getOperationItems() in OperationByIdRowImpl class which return RowIterator, and it give me instances of OperationItemRowImpl class, but not OperationItem with rows where operation_item.operation_id = operation.id
Thanks in advance

For realizations "clone" method which make copy for current row from OPERATION table and all rows from OPERATION_ITEM table where
operation_item.operation_id = operation.id I moved realisation business logic from View Object to Entity.
For it enough:
1) entities objects: OperationEntity, OperationItemEntity;
2) association for this entities: OperationItemToOperation;
3) entity-based view object: OperationById which have bind parameter "id" for find operation by ID;
4) application module: ApplicationModule;
I add method createCurrentRowClone to OperationByIdImpl class. It just call createClone method for current row:
public void createCurrentRowClone() {
OperationByIdRowImpl currentRow = (OperationById) getCurrentRow();
currentRow.createClone();
method createClone in OperationByIdRowImpl class call createClone method from entity layer:
public void createClone() {
getOperationEntity().createClone();
method createClone in OperationEntityImpl class make new row and call createClone for all row from OperationItemEntity:
public void createClone() {
OperationEntityImpl newRow = (OperationEntityImpl) getDefinitionObject().createInstance2(
getDBTransaction(),null);
newAtm.setCode(getCode());
//create copy for all rows atm_operation
RowIterator itemIterator = getOperationItemEntities();
while ( itemIterator .hasNext() ) {
OperationItemEntity itemRow = (OperationItemEntity ) itemIterator.next();
itemRow.createClone(newRow);
and finally method createClone(OperationEntityImpl operation) in OperationItemEntityImpl class make new row in OPERATION_ITEM table
public void createClone(OperationEntityImpl operation) {
OperationItemEntityImpl newItem = (OperationItemEntityImpl) getDefinitionObject().createInstance2(
getDBTransaction(), operation);
newItem.setCode(getCode());
If you have another solution, please post it here.

Deferred Syntax Error : ADF Business Rules

Hi all,
I am working on business rule implementation in my project . I have created a dictionary (.rule) file and added oracle rules and oracle rule editor component libraries to the project . The page fragement contains the rulesdc component which reads the dictionary file from a path . i have also added oracle.soa.rules_dict_dc.webapp.war to the integerated WLS Deployments section. when i run the page i get an error ' Error: Encountered deferred syntax #{ in template text. If intended as a literal, escape it or set directive deferredSyntaxAllowedAsLiteral' . I have also tried with having deferredSyntaxAllowedAsLiteral value true in the page which contains the rulesdc component but no use. the error still persists .
can anybody help in this case?
Thanx in advance

Thank you for pointing this out.
I'm currently browsing metalink kb but "7021469 - Business Rules should support dataexport and dataimportbin functionality" provides no results.
hbr_93300_readme.pdf refers indeee to that issue but I cannot upgrade to that version (because, as stated in that pdf, I should upgrade all prouducts to 9.3.3)
You said it might be solved in Administration Services release 9.3.1.5 (I believe 9.3.1.1.5 was a typo), but the readme does not mention it...

How to get rid of Business Rule in JhsModel: JHS-00128 Allowable Values req

JHeadstart 10.1.3.2
We are using FlexItems in our application.
The JhsModel implementation, shipped in Jar file jhsadfrt-10.1.3.jar, contains the underlying ADF BC objects for the FlexItem functionality.
When we try to create (or remove) a FlexItemDefinition of type Dropdown List, we are stopped by the error: JHS-00128: Allowable Values are required for this Item Display Type.
We do not want that - we have a UID that does not allow editing of master and details on the same page. Therefore, we will never be able to successfully create a dropdown list item since we cannot in the same transaction create the allowable values as well.
How could we disable this business rule - or remove it altogether? I suppose it is implemented somewhere in the jar file that contains the JhsModel project. What is the recommended way of disabling this constraint?
thanks for your help
Lucas

Hi Lucas,
This error is raised if the number of allowable values is zero and the allowable values query of the flexitemdefinitions entity is 'empty'. You could write a (temporary) dummy allowable values query in the flexitemdefinitions entity in order to save the master, and then once you've input the allowable values in the details page, remove or reset the value in the allowable values query attribute of the flexitemdefinitions entity.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Ibrahim

Developing Business Services with ADF BC

Hello all,
I was following the tutorial at http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/obe1013jdev/10131/bslayer/bslayer.htm#t2s5, which is Developing Business Services with ADF Business Components
AND i was wondering if i could add a custom validation that would: prevent the user from entering a Gender IF the credit limit is greater than 400? Is this possible? If so, could some point me in the right direction
Cheers

Hi,
you have two options:
1. add the validation on the ADF BC model using a method validator. This would compare the two attributes and throw an exception if the business rule is violated
2. Use a ValueChange Listener on the credit limit field (in association with a autosubmit=true setting on the field) to enable the gender field through a Partial Page Refresh. To programmatically refresh a field using PPR, you create a binding of the component to refresh o a managed bean using its binding property. Then you call
AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(<component reference here>)
Frank

Business Rule - Problem with Validation Execution

I'm running into an issue where conditional Validation Execution is not working as expected. The background is that i have an Entity Object containing a few string attributes on which i must apply Regular Expression business rules to make sure only characters in a certain range is set. I am using a Not Matches regex on the following:
.*[^\u0020-\uD7FF].*1 attribute is required, 2 are optional. The problem I am experiencing is with the 2 optional attributes.
Since these are optional, I intended to use the Validation Execution tab so that the Rule is executed only when the attribute is not null. For example, here is what i tried for an attribute named Comments:
Comments != nullNo validation occurred when I entered an invalid value, such as a string containing line breaks, in a corresponding ADF Faces page. For the heck of it, i experimented by setting the validation execution to the opposite of what i should be - in other words, trigger validation if the attribute is null, such as:
Comments == nullWith this, the validation occurred as expected.
Is this a bug, or am I misunderstanding something? I'm not particularly good with RegEx - is it possible this is due to some nuance of the expression?
Version: JDeveloper 11.1.1.6.
Thanks-
-george

i'm not sure if this is the correct answer or a workaround to the issue i had asked about. Given that caveat, if anyone else ever runs across this thread, what i found worked was to not use the attribute name in the Validation Execution tab's expression, but instead to just newValue as in the following:
newValue != null

Problem in mapping Task payload parameters to Oracle Business Rules facts

Hi all,
We are using complex types from our project XSDs inside the Human Task payload. We intend to use these Human Task payload parameters to build routing rules using the Oracle Business Rules interface. Our observation is that when the complexity of these complex types increase, the business rules editor does not show these as facts that can be used in formulating rules.
Has anybody faced such a problem before. Any help is appreciated.
We are using the following link to add routing rules –
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E25054_01/dev.1111/e10224/bp_decision.htm
Version details :
ADF Business Components     11.1.1.60.13
Java(TM) Platform     1.6.0_29
Oracle IDE     11.1.1.5.37.60.13
SOA Composite Editor     11.1.1.5.0.01.74
Thanks,
Yamini.

Problem solved. There was an element in the xml schema that had nillable = true. Because of this the XML Fact for that element would no longer be available in the BPEL Process. Removing the nillable and generating the XML Facts again solved the missing variable problem.

Oracle Business Rule : Unable to modify the rule at runtime

Hi
I am developing simple Business rule using Oracle jdevelper 11g which displays a message based on two rules.
rule1 : If amount <= 100, displays the message "Less than or equal to 100"
rule2 : If amount >100 and amount less than 200 display the message "Between 100 and 200"
The above rule is created within the BPEL process which accepts a parameter. Once the BPEL project has been published, it has created a Dictionary with one ruleset having two rules mentioned above.
If I test the BPEL process through em console response is getting displayed based on the above rule.
Now I am trying to modify Rule2 through SOA Composer as below.
Rule2 : If amount >100 and amount less than 300 display the message "Between 100 and 300"
After editing and modifying the rule , the message is not getting updated properly in the properties window. If I save and commit the rule, BPEL process is giving the error
If any one has faced this problem and got the solution, please help me to solve this issue
Thanks in advance

Hi
Thanks for the response.
I have saved and committed the new rule. When modified the rule, assert new value is displaying as blank. If I click on Validate button, it is not displaying any error. Once I save and commit it is showing below error in BPEL Process
The selected operation process could not be invoked.
An exception occured while invoking the webservice operation. Please see logs for more details.
java.lang.Exception: oracle.sysman.emSDK.webservices.wsdlapi.SoapTestException: faultName: {{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/business-process/}selectionFailure} messageType: {{http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension}RuntimeFaultMessage} at oracle.sysman.emas.model.wsmgt.WSTestModel.invokeOperation(WSTestModel.java:575) at oracle.sysman.emas.view.wsmgt.WSView.invokeOperation(WSView.java:381) at oracle.sysman.emas.view.wsmgt.WSView.invokeOperation(WSView.java:298) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at com.sun.el.parser.AstValue.invoke(Unknown Source) at com.sun.el.MethodExpressionImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.taglib.util.MethodExpressionMethodBinding.invoke(MethodExpressionMethodBinding.java:53) at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.broadcastToMethodBinding(UIXComponentBase.java:1256) at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXCommand.broadcast(UIXCommand.java:183) at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.ContextSwitchingComponent$1.run(ContextSwitchingComponent.java:92) at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.ContextSwitchingComponent._processPhase(ContextSwitchingComponent.java:361) at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.ContextSwitchingComponent.broadcast(ContextSwitchingComponent.java:96) at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.UIXInclude.broadcast(UIXInclude.java:102) at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.ContextSwitchingComponent$1.run(ContextSwitchingComponent.java:92) at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.ContextSwitchingComponent._processPhase(ContextSwitchingComponent.java:361) at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.ContextSwitchingComponent.broadcast(ContextSwitchingComponent.java:96) at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.UIXInclude.broadcast(UIXInclude.java:96) at javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot.broadcastEvents(UIViewRoot.java:475) at javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot.processApplication(UIViewRoot.java:756) at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl._invokeApplication(LifecycleImpl.java:788) at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl._executePhase(LifecycleImpl.java:306) at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.execute(LifecycleImpl.java:186) at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:265) at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227) at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300) at weblogic.servlet.internal.TailFilter.doFilter(TailFilter.java:26) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.help.web.rich.OHWFilter.doFilter(Unknown Source) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.sysman.emSDK.license.LicenseFilter.doFilter(LicenseFilter.java:101) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.adf.model.servlet.ADFBindingFilter.doFilter(ADFBindingFilter.java:205) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.rich.RegistrationFilter.doFilter(RegistrationFilter.java:106) at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl$FilterListChain.doFilter(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:446) at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.activedata.AdsFilter.doFilter(AdsFilter.java:60) at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl$FilterListChain.doFilter(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:446) at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl._doFilterImpl(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:271) at org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.TrinidadFilterImpl.doFilter(TrinidadFilterImpl.java:177) at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.webapp.TrinidadFilter.doFilter(TrinidadFilter.java:92) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.sysman.emas.fwk.MASConnectionFilter.doFilter(MASConnectionFilter.java:41) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.adf.library.webapp.LibraryFilter.doFilter(LibraryFilter.java:175) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.sysman.eml.app.AuditServletFilter.doFilter(AuditServletFilter.java:179) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.sysman.eml.app.EMRepLoginFilter.doFilter(EMRepLoginFilter.java:203) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.sysman.core.model.targetauth.EMLangPrefFilter.doFilter(EMLangPrefFilter.java:158) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.sysman.core.app.perf.PerfFilter.doFilter(PerfFilter.java:141) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.sysman.eml.app.ContextInitFilter.doFilter(ContextInitFilter.java:542) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter$1.run(JpsAbsFilter.java:111) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at oracle.security.jps.util.JpsSubject.doAsPrivileged(JpsSubject.java:313) at oracle.security.jps.ee.util.JpsPlatformUtil.runJaasMode(JpsPlatformUtil.java:413) at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.runJaasMode(JpsAbsFilter.java:94) at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.doFilter(JpsAbsFilter.java:161) at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsFilter.doFilter(JpsFilter.java:71) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at oracle.dms.servlet.DMSServletFilter.doFilter(DMSServletFilter.java:136) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at weblogic.servlet.internal.RequestEventsFilter.doFilter(RequestEventsFilter.java:27) at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(WebAppServletContext.java:3715) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3681) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2277) at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2183) at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1454) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178) Caused by: oracle.sysman.emSDK.webservices.wsdlapi.SoapTestException: faultName: {{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/business-process/}selectionFailure} messageType: {{http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension}RuntimeFaultMessage} at oracle.sysman.emSDK.webservices.wsdlapi.dispatch.DispatchUtil.invoke(DispatchUtil.java:260) at oracle.sysman.emSDK.webservices.wsdlparser.OperationInfoImpl.invokeWithDispatch(OperationInfoImpl.java:992) at oracle.sysman.emas.model.wsmgt.PortName.invokeOperation(PortName.java:729) at oracle.sysman.emas.model.wsmgt.WSTestModel.invokeOperation(WSTestModel.java:569) ... 79 more Caused by: javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPFaultException: faultName: {{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/business-process/}selectionFailure} messageType: {{http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/extension}RuntimeFaultMessage} at oracle.j2ee.ws.client.jaxws.DispatchImpl.throwJAXWSSoapFaultException(DispatchImpl.java:1024) at oracle.j2ee.ws.client.jaxws.DispatchImpl.invoke(DispatchImpl.java:808) at oracle.j2ee.ws.client.jaxws.OracleDispatchImpl.synchronousInvocationWithRetry(OracleDispatchImpl.java:235) at oracle.j2ee.ws.client.jaxws.OracleDispatchImpl.invoke(OracleDispatchImpl.java:106) at oracle.sysman.emSDK.webservices.wsdlapi.dispatch.DispatchUtil.invoke(DispatchUtil.java:256) ... 82 more

Business rules in ADF-BC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for