C200 M2 forgets SW RAID Setting

Hello Folks,
I'm using the SW Raid feature of an C200 M2 Server. It works well, but if the server is disconnected from power for some hours it "forgets" the SW RAID Setting and boot order in the BIOS, defaults back to Enhanced mode. BIOS and CIMC Firmware are in actual SW state (updated with the
ucs-c200-huu-1.4.2.iso ) Is there any solution for this problem?
Thanks
Bernhard Dick

Hello Padma,
there is no additional controller card, I'm only using the integrated Software RAID, the boot configuration consists only of the Raid volume. And it matches the shown configuration within the CIMC.
I could reproduce it the last three times I had disconnected power for about 10 hours, last switch on after ~6 hours w/o power everything went fine. During the week the system sits in a production environment, I'll go and check if I can reproduce it again with >= 10 hours without power next weekend.
I did the update all selection in the Host Upgrade Utility.
Regards
Bernhard

Similar Messages

Vista won't install on a RAID set. ***SOLVED***

I just installed my new MSI 790GX-G65 system and I cannot install Vista (32-bit) on any type of 2 disk RAID set that I have tried to create. I can get the installer to see the drive(s) by loading the driver, but after partitioning and formatting, I get a message about "windows cannot find a valid drive for install" or something to that effect. I can install fine using IDE mode and just picking one of the drives. Any help would be appreciated.

Quote from: FrogmanTM on 09-August-09, 05:39:36
Well, I solved it! The problem was with the Vista installation process itself. It turns out that Windows reads information about the boot sequence from the BIOS of the motherboard. It looks at this information to understand what will happen when the system boots for the first time. If you have a USB drive connected to the system and it is listed in the boot config as a bootable device (in my case the BIOS put the USB stick as the second boot device, right after the CD drive, and the RAID volume was listed AFTER the USB stick) - you will probably see this error: "Windows could not determine if this computer contains a valid system volume."
To get past it, I had to re-configure the BIOS Boot options to NOT include my USB drive as a bootable device (or just drop the priority below whatever drive you will be booting from). You can also boot your system without a USB drive installed - not an option for me since I need to install 3rd party raid drivers.
Whew! Thanx for all your help, I am glad I finally figured it out.
Wow dude you're a genius for two days I've been searching and searching and searching wondering why my vista wont install onto my raid 0. I have a DFI board with a 760fx chipset, i have done all the bios updates and brand new raid drivers and to no avail. Found this post and voila. Thanks a lot. Such a simple fix usually the last thing you think of or not think of it at all.

Mac Pro (2009) RAID Card - Can't create RAID Set

Hi Everyone,
I have a Mac Pro 4,1 (Model 2009) running Mavericks 10.9.2. with the Apple RAID Card installed. I got 4 new SAS Drives (Dell Toshiba MK2001TRKB) which I'm trying to configure into a single RAID5 set.
OS X detects the individual drives and with Disk Utility I can partition and/or format the individual drives. However when I try to create a RAID5 set using RAID Utility, the card won't create the RAID set. Ik keeps on showing the white-blue stripped progress bar. Tried creating a RAID0 or RAID1 with just 2 drives, but the card just doesn't create a RAID set.
Anyone got a clue why this isn't working?
Thanks,
Sander

Manualy erased all 4 the drives and it worked instantly. System is now initializing the volume :-)
Still a bit strange. All 4 the drivers where brand new. I did some further testing and if I select the partion tab and just create a new partition on each drive, it still doesn't work. I have to select the erase option in Disk Utility and just do a simple erase on each drive in order to be able to create the RAIDset.
Anyway, Thanks for the advise; performance even during initializing is pretty fast. I'm curious to see what kind of performance I get aftet the initialization is completed.

Mac Pro 2009 Raid Set Lost after Hard Reboot

We have a newer Nehalem based Mac Pro with a 2009 Black Apple Hardware Raid card. The Hard Drive Configuration is: 4 x 2TB Western Digital drives setup as a Raid 1+0 array providing 4TB of space with what we believed to be optimal performance and redundancy. We had two volumes / partitions configured on the array, one 120GB for the OS and the remaining 3.8TB for data.
Everything was working fine when the server froze up. ON the Screen an error message said there is a problem with your Raid controller, Please open Apple Raid Utility.. Unfortunatly when we tried to do that we just got a spining beachball. We tried to open finder and it beachballed. We tried to force quit and nothing working. Finally we were left with no choice but to do a hard restart of the server and turn the machine off and then back on.
When the server came back on it would not boot up. We were greeting with the Folder with a Queston Mark. We booted from the Mac 10.6 Snow leopard Server Disk and opened up Apples Raid utility software. Much to our shock the Raid Set and the two Volumes were not shown in the Utility. However all 4 of the drives were listed and all being shown as Green light good status, but listed as "Roaming". We weren't sure what to do, the volumes weren't accesible since they didn't exist, the Raid set wasn't there, there was no way to run something like Data Rescue Recovery software. We tried calling Apple and have to wait until they open this morning. After looking online at various forums we came accross this problem with no solutions. Most of the people with the problems had the older 2006 Blue Raid card, and this appeared to be a common issue amoung others with the older card. I decided to try and re-create the Raid 1+0 set. However as soon as I did that I was prompted by Raid Utility that the drives I was selecting to use for the Raid set were already a part of another raid set and using them would delete the data on the set. I obviously canceled the process. Crazy enough the system knows the drives belong to a Raid set but doesn't realize it should know what the raid set information is.
We were using Mac OS 10.6.7 Snow Leopard Server, and I even tried installing and updating an external drive with 10.6.7 Server and booted from the drive from the machine and try to run Raid Utility. That did not work either. Any advice from anyone would be awesome. I'm worried what Apple is going to say when I do get a hold of them, the system is under Apple Care warranty. Thanks in advance for anyone's time.

I haven't lost data, but in my 2010 Mac Pro with 2009-vintage Apple RAID card, it has this Really Annoying Habit of constantly losing Disk 3 (the spare) in my 4x2 TB internal RAID5 array whenever I have to do a hard reboot.
I keep having to re-mark the now-"Roaming" drive as a Spare and then wait 8+ hours for it to rebuild the array ... grrr.
I saw an Apple KB article that suggests removing the Roaming disk and re-inserting it. Duh. Fat lot of good that did. Really wish there was some answer to this issue ... hard reboots should NOT cause array disks to go from "Assigned"/good to "Roaming"!

Advice on RAID Sets, Volume Sets, and RAID Levels of the Volume Sets using an Areca Controller

I have read through a lot of information on disk usage, storage rules for an editing rig, users inquiries/member responses in this forum and I thank each and every one of you – especially Harm.
In building my new workstation, I purchased five (5) WD 1T, 7k, 64M SATAIII hard drives and an Areca RAID card, ARC-1880ix-16-4G, which I plan to use primarily as my media/data disk array. The workstation will use a 128GB SATAIII SSD as the OS/program drive and I will transfer two (2) WD Raptor/10k SATA 70GB drives from my current system for pagefile/scratch/render use. I tentatively plan on using a mobo SATAIII port for the SSD and mobo SATA ports with a software RAID (level 0) for the 10k Raptors.
In reading the Areca Instruction manual, I am now considering exactly how I should configure the 5 physical 1TB drives in terms of RAID Level(s), Volume Sets, and RAID Sets. I must admit that I like the opportunity of allowing for a Dedicated Hot Spare as I am generally distrustful of the MTBF data that drive vendors tout and have the bad experience in the past of losing data from a mal-configured RAID array and a single drive hardware failure (admittedly, my fault!).
In line with the logic that one doesn’t want to perform disk reading while trying to write at the same time (or vice-versa), I am thinking the approach above should work OK in using the mobo disk interface and both software and external hardware RAID controllers without having to create separate RAID level configurations within a Volume Set or further dividing up the physical drives into separate RAID sets. I know in forum messages that Harm noted that he had 17 drives and I could envision a benefit to having separate RAID sets in that situation, but I am not at that point yet.
To some degree I think it might be best to just create one RAID Level on one Volume Set on one RAID Set, but want to solicit thoughts from veteran controller users on their workflows/thoughts in these regards.
Anyone care to share thoughts/perspectives? Thanks
Bill

Thanks for the speedy feedback Harm - I appreciate it.
I was thinking RAID level 3 as well.
Of course, it's always something! I purchased the Caviar Blacks by mistake - which are non-TLER. I will work with EggHead to return the ones I purchased and replace them with RE4 versions as I'm not thrilled about the possibility of the controller declaring the volume/disks degraded unnecessarily and although I have the DOS utility WDTLER where one is supposed to be able to enable/disable TLER on WD drives - I suspect WD is way beyond that now anyway with current builds.
I agree with you about just testing the performance of the options for the raptors - on the mobo and then on the controller. When I benchmark them I'll post the results in case others are curious.
Thanks again....off to EggHead!

This disk doesn't contain an EFI system partition. If you want to start up your computer with this disk or include it in a RAID set, back up your data and partition this disk.

As stated above. I get this when I try to resize my HD. Was having issues with BootCamp so I removed it and got this.
This disk doesn’t contain an EFI system partition. If you want to start up your computer with this disk or include it in a RAID set, back up your data and partition this disk.

the same problem...
any help?

Creating a mirrored raid set with a hard drive that already has data on it.

I have a hard drive that I keep my photos on, and want to create a mirrored raid set that includes this drive, with its data, and another drive. How can I do this without erasing the drive with my photos on them? I am running 10.7.5 if that matters.
Thanks for any help.

Creating a Mirrored RAID reformats the drive and loads a substantial RAID driver and some tables onto it. When completed, the drive is inherently a member of a RAID set, and will continue to be so even if moved to another Mac.
because of this, you cannot create a RAID directly on a standard drive that contains data already in any reasonable, risk-free way.
To amplify what The Hatter has said above, Mirrored RAID is not Backup. Mirrored RAID only increases mean time to repair to keep a drive failure from becoming a Data Disaster. You still need a Backup. Mirrored RAID does not protect you from deletions from user error, crazy software, or "just because".
I run a mirrored RAID in my Home Server, which contains all the Users files for everyone in the Household. And I also recognize (after being burned by it) that Mirrored RAID is helpful, but not a sufficient Backup by itself. I back up the Users Drive automatically to an External drive using Time Machine. [So what I am advising is not just theoretical, I am living what I am advising.]
With WD Black 1TB and other very good drives in the under US$100 range, there is really no reason NOT to invest in several drives for such an undertaking.

Macbook Pro with Dual hard drives. Scratch Disk, Memory 64bit, Raid, Set Up Questions.

Hello, this is my first post.
I just upgraded from the original 2006 17" Macbook Pro to a refurbished 13" Macbook Pro 2.53GHZ 4GB Ram (2009 model).
I bought the MCE Tech Optibay and installed it (if you dont know anything about it, ask me, its amazing.) So now I have 2x 500GB 7200RPM Seagate hard drives installed.
I am running Snow Leopard, CS3, Lightroom 1.4.
I have the main hard drive set up with Snow Leopard and all the Applications. I keep all my files on external firewire 800 drives, except files I am currently working on.
The second hard drive is set up as a scratch disk for Photoshop CS3 and that is it.
I am looking to upgrade to CS5 and Lightroom 3 here within this month or so. Or if I get anxious, tomorrow, haha.
I want to know the best setup I can do with my current set up with CS3 and for my future setup with CS5.
Any info will appreciated.
-Would some kind of raid set up with my internal drives be better? How does raid work with scratch disks?
-If I upgrade to 8GB memory in my macbook pro, would I even see a difference in performance if I didn't have a scratch disk? Since CS5 and Snow Leopard can use more memory in 64bit.
I think thats all I have on my brain right now. I may have more questions, or I can guarantee I will have more later.
Thanks alot.

First the scratch. Like you said, most everyone has a different take on scratch discs but I'd guess you're wasting one heck of a lot of hard drive space using all 500 GB for Scratch, did I read that right? If I did read it correctly YES, partition it and get some use out of it!!
I've got a unibody MBP 2.93GHz, OS 10.5.8, CS3 & PS 5 (running in 32bit mode), and 8 gigs of ram. I've partitioned the one 300 GB drive so 50GB is scratch, the other partition is for OS, & Apps, and documents (images).
I use LR 2 first than export to PS 5 to finish up. My photos get to be 300MB to 500MB in size and both versions of PS work on this setup just fine. Using PS 5 in 64 bit mode is faster opening files but NON of my plugin's are 64 bit yet, that's why I'm still stuck in 32 bit mode.
Not knowing what size or kind of files you work on makes giving advice a bit tough but try setting the status indicator (don't know the right name for it) in the bottom left corner of any PS open file to "Efficiency" and watch what happens when you process your files. I rarely see mine drop below 90%, I've got the usable RAM in PS Prefs set to it's max suggested, cut way back on History and Cache.
Can't wait for NIK and others to offer their plugin in 64 bit, later this year is what I was told.
There used to be an old "rule of thumb" with old version of PS about Scratch disc size. I don't remember exactly but it may have been 3 to 5 times the size of your biggest file??
Good luck, Alan

How can I temporarily remove a RAID set but keep the data?

I recently had to restore my Netgear ReadyNAS to factory settings, which meant that I needed to make a backup of its data and restore it afterwards. The only possible way to back up the 8.5Tb of data was to get 9Tb of WD Red disks and somehow use them - so my immediate thought was that the Mac Pro would be a good idea. I t had four drives in it, but three of them were not being used by the OS so they could be temporarily removed.
So I replaced three of my four Mac Pro drives with new 3Tb drives and used Disk Utility to set them up as a JBOD. I then used this JBOD drive to back up the NAS and restore it again after I had re-installed its O/S (the whole thing took two weeks!!!).
So now I'm in the following situation:
* I want to tear down the JBOD set and take the three new drives out of the Mac Pro again and replace them with the drives I normally use there so that I can go back to making music (which is what I usually use it for).
* I also want to be able to put the new drives back in and read the data as a JBOD again if needed (in case anything is discovered to be amiss with my ReadyNAS backup/restore operation) - let's say for the next month I'll plan to keep the old drives around for safety.
How can I remove the JBOD set in such a way that I can set it up again using the same drives, and access the data (i.e. I don't want to delete the RAID set the usual way because that will delete the data too - apparently...)?

Going to ask the mods to move this to MacPro, Hatter can answer your question, but I'm pretty sure if you power down and remove the RAID drives, you can put them in back again and boot up and the RAID will still be recognized as the info is stored on the drives themselves in the GUID/MBR of each drive in the set.
Also you should know, there is a new MacPro coming and it doesn't accept internal drives, only external.
So you should prepare and have some sort of external hardware redundancy for your data that isn't dependent on the Mac HFS+ formatting as Windows doesn't read that.
Perhaps exFAT would be better as both platforms can read/write that, but if the drives are going to be used with a PC ever, they need to be formatted by Windows for exFAT to get it right. Check first before you commit to copying huge data over.
Anyway research it, because if your MacPro dies, you might be up the creek and have some issues getting at all that data since it's in a RAID, external options might not work correctly or reliably for RAID.
Also consider talking to the fellows at MacGuru's, they are external RAID box setup experts for Mac's, sounds like you need a RAID 5 box, gives redundancy and can connect to any computer.
Hardware RAID is more reliable than software ones, cross platform as well.
good luck.

RAID Sets:

What are RAID sets?????????????
I want to use them if they are what I think they are. Automatic synchronization of volumes???????????????????
Am I Correct???????????????????????
How do I begin??????????????
And is it possible for volumes from two different Hard Drives to be part of the Raid Set??????????????????????????

A RAID is only really beneficial if the drives being used are internal drive on a fast bus, such as in a Mac Pro or Power Mac.
The only way to do it with an iMac G3 is to string a few external drives from the FireWire port (or get one of those enclosures that house multiple drives). Because modern single drives already exceed the speed of the FireWire connection, having a RAID connected to FireWire will not significantly increase data transfer rates. Also, modern single drives can now go as high as 2TB, so the other RAID benefit of creating a large volume is also negated. As for data redundancy, it may be beneficial to be able to sway drives without downtime, but it is not that useful in a desktop (client) machine. Using a single drive is simpler and more reliable, with backups to a separate single drive.

RAID Set not showing up - 3 severe events

Intelle Xserve running 10.6 RAID Card running firmware v E-1.3.2.0, Two it drives set up with I think RAID 5.
The main person for the system is away as well as his backup. So I'm running on very little information at the moment.
Log:
Called in due to user not able to access shared files (Also shared FileMakerpro databases and Portfolio server). Only access to server was via screen share.
Could not connect. After trying all that I could, powered down the server. Restarted, got a login startup permissions error for an item to run at startup. (I'll have to check what exactly that was). Started the Portfolia server and the FileMakerpro databases. Users able to access and use.
Next day same thing. User lost connection with the server. Restarted, start filemakerpro databases and portfoilio services. User able to access.
I suggest pulling over the files needed to work just in case it looses connection again, User starts to pull over some files which is transfering.
About 15 minutes later I get a call that the user lost connection again.
Restart the once again. This time get errors from the RAID utility:
Non-viable RAID set RS1 and all associated volumes are offline
Drive 3:500 missing - Replace immediately or acknowledge loss of RAID set RS1 and associated volumes
Drive 3:500 missing - Previous drive status was inuse
The RAID utility does not show a RAID set.
The drive appear to be OK
The drive shows up on the desktop but when I go into the drive the folders etc are showing. Access the main folder results in a loop where it bails out and just shows the desktop again.
I'm going to get some files to the user from the timemachine backup for now.
Is it possible that the data is OK and maybe the drive are marked off line for the set but still OK?
Any info would be great,
Thanks

Yes the 160GB has the OS. I'm coming into this cold as the main person and the backup are currently away.
I have got the users a work around so they can do thier work. The backup person has very limited email contact and he had thought it was a RAID 5.B But I would agree this looks to be a RAID 0 or 1 since there are only two drive available for data.

RAID sets and volumes

I am trying to set up a RAID5 but am having trouble with the volumes. My RAID set is 5.23TB but my Volume is only 2TB. I am creating a second volume of 3.23TB. Is there a way to combine the two volumes into one volume of 5.23TB to match the RAID set?

Use this guide:
RAID Utility - User Guide
To delete a RAID set or a volume:
1 Open RAID Utility and choose the volume or RAID set in the left column.
2 Click Delete Volume or Delete RAID Set.

Volumes and raid sets disappeared

I booted my machine and it gave me a question mark folder I booted it off an external drive but the internal bay hdds arent mounting. When I was looking through raid utility it says they are all good and viable disks in roaming but no raid sets or volumes are there anymore. This all happened to my xserve (2008 2.8ghz 4gb ram) Three apple brand hdd at 1TB(in a raid 5 configuration) the os I had installed on the external hdd was 10.5.3..... any ideas or thoughts to getting the raid sets or volumes back.... also Disk utility still doesnt recogonize the three internal bays is that cause for concern or do you have to have a raid set and volume before disk utility to recogonize it. Thank you for your time and insight to my problem!

Use this guide:
RAID Utility - User Guide
To delete a RAID set or a volume:
1 Open RAID Utility and choose the volume or RAID set in the left column.
2 Click Delete Volume or Delete RAID Set.

Can't create a RAID set using the Utilities window

Hello! this seems so weird to me. I have 2 new LaCie 500GB drives. I'm working with ProTools (music production) and I need redundancy in terms of data safety, that's the reason for creating a mirrored RAID set. 500 GB should last me for awhile OK. Drives are brand new out of the box. They came formatted as FAT-32, got rid of that and erased and reformatted them as OS extended, journaled. They can be seen in system profiler. They mount and unmount OK. They can each accept and store files and I can retrieve files from them. But I can't join them to create a mirrored RAID set. In the disk utility window, I highlight the icon of either drive and try to drag it into the window but it won't drag. What's going on? I did this just fine with my earlier Lacie 200GB drives and an MBP, what's wrong here?
I have a feeling I'm doing something really basic and really wrong but I can't see it!
Anybody got any ideas? Thanks
Rick

It's subtle; I had the same problem and it took me a month to track it down.
It's not enough to reformat your new drives, you also need to repartition them to either GUID Partition Table or Apple Partition Map. Look and I'll bet your drives, properly formated as HFS+ (Mac, Journaling) are still however showing Master Boot Record as their partition scheme -- you'll need to re-partition them.
You need to use the "Options..." button when partitioning via the Disk Utility. You can choose whichever Map/Table is appropriate for your hardware from the window that opens.
My scheme: copy the data to one, repartition the second, copy the data back onto the second one from the first one, repartition the first one, copy the data back onto the first one from the second, and you should be good to go in setting up your RAID.

Offline Disc In Degraded Mirrored RAID Set

I have a 2 disc (300GB each) mirrored RAID set that has worked fine up until recently. One slice appeared failed so I attempted to rebuild it. 7 hours later it still showed up as failed. I attempted a rebuild once more and the same result. I then shut everything down and re-booted my whole system. Now the RAID set is still degraded but the slice now shows up as offline as opposed to failed.
I checked the connections and it's all connected fine.
I have run First Aid several times and no repairs were necessary.
Anyway I can get this back 'online'?
If not, can I delete it, repair it and if it's repaired add it back to the RAID set?

It sounds like one of the drives in the mirrored set has lost its mind (i.e., failed).
This is exactly the situation Mirrored RAID is good for.
Remove the failed drive, insert your spare drive of the same or larger size, and assign it as a spare. Then you should be able to get the RAID to rebuild onto the spare and bring it up to date in the next half-a-day or so. Then the mirror will show as working again.
Make sure your Backup is up-to-date. A second failure now (before the array has rebuilt) will give you data loss.

C200 M2 forgets SW RAID Setting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for