CAD interface and PRO-E interface

hi
i am new to DMS
i just want to know, how the cad interface can be linked with SAP-DMS....?
some thing like activation or some process is required? CAD licence is a must?
how can i integrate?
pls update me on this issue
wht about pro-

Hello,
You will need liscenced CAD application and Interface.
You will have to install proper CAD interface for proper CAD application. You will have to do necessary configuration settings.
Once integration is in place you can create DIR's, Materials, BOMs etc from CAD application.
CIDEON interface is available for AutoCAD, Autodesk, Inventor, Solidedge and Solidworks integration.
Interface from reissengineering is available for ProE intrgration.
Hope this information is useful to you.
Regards,
Milind

Similar Messages

Audio hardware interface to use with Logic Studio 8 and Pro Tools M-Powered

I want to get Logic Studio and Pro Tools M-Powered. I do film sound design and music as a hobby. I plan to compose music with Logic and edit film audio with Pro Tools.
Here is my main concern:
I want to get ONE firewire audio interface that will work with both programs (Logic Studio and Pro Tools). I need one that has multiple outputs because I will be mixing in surround sound (mostly the film audio). Are there any suggestions? Inputs on what people like, don't like, work well with both? What I should completely avoid? I figured Pro Tools M-Powered (as opposed to LE, HD) would be better for me simply because of price and possibly using the m-audio interface with Logic too.
Let the advice begin please. I will be happy to answer any questions you have for me that would help you provide better advice for me.
Thank you in advance
TTW13

Yes, Logic Studio is surround sound capable, but unfortunately a lot of places that I would potentially like to be working at, that do audio post, that I've seen, require a knowledge of Pro Tools. I know it's not the best but it's the industry standard and it's what many companies use so I need to learn it (basically). I don't want to limit myself to stereo outs on the audio interface on PT. Maybe I should to keep my budget down though??? I guess now I'm looking at PT LE and the 003 family, this one in particular
http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?langid=100&navid=126&itemid=5028
I dunno, by the time it's "technically" compatible with Leopard I might be able to afford it.
Anyone currently using Pro Tools LE with Leopard right now? For some people it apparently works???

Cad Interface

Dear all
What is the integration process of any cad package with SAP?
If my company uses 3D modeling software like ProE, Catia and I want to transfer documents, Material master and BOM details to SAP with seamless or batch mode options then what is the standard methodology ?
Regards
Sandeep

For SAP CAD interface you need to install software developed by PLM Alliance
CAD Integration solutions are developed by SAP Partner for each CAD Integration
For AutoCAD/ AutoDesk INVENTOR - CIDEON
For CATIA V4,V5 - CEINIT
For Pro/Engineer - .RIESS
For Solid Edge& Solid works - GEDAS
For Unigraphics - DSC
The Software are distributed by SAP.
Customization is taken care by development partner

Auto cad interface in sap

how can i do Auto cad interface in sap
Edited by: sreekanth chowdary on Feb 10, 2009 4:28 PM

Hi,
What would you like to do exactly, Create a Drawing and Save it SAP?
If you can do it in OLE then goto Transaction DWDM. There click on Demo for OLE container under Office Integration tree.
This shows how to interact with Paint, Video clip PPT's and so on.
This might be useful for your exploration getting new ideas. All the best.
Thanks,
Prashanth
Edited by: Prashanth KR on Feb 10, 2009 10:39 AM

Logic 7.1 and Pro Tools...a few questions...

Hi everyone,
I just have a couple of questions regarding Logic and Pro Tools. My employer has commissioned me to upgrade his studio from Logic 5.0 (mac os version) to the latest version, which is now 7.1.1 (but we may stick with 7.1 just till I'm sure it won't mess up his setup). I thought I'd post just to get a bit of clarification.
Here are the details of his main theatre studio:
Pro Tools 6.4.1
2 x Digidesign 888 I/O Interface
OS X Panther 10.3.5
Dual 1.25 GHz G4
1 Gig DDR SDRAM
I've read and seen a lot of posts regarding big problems running Logic and certain configurations of Pro Tools in conjunction, however until now this has not been a concern for me as my studio is purely based off of core audio Logic 7.1 and Reason 3.03. So here are the main questions I have:
1. How much is the upgrade going to be? Is is just the standard upgrade or is he going to get shafted and have to buy the whole program again (NOTE: he does have the dongle and all the necessary paperwork from Logic 5.0 mac version)
2. Are there known problems with the configuration that I've outlined above, I really don't want to suggest he go ahead and a) upgrade b) buy the the program again if he must, if there is going to be a problem, he predominantly works in Pro Tools and Logic will just be available as an added selling point to his studio, and composition ablity.
Any information about this or clarification would be greatly appreciated, thank you in advance,
Graham Campbell
PS - if you need more info to answer don't hesiate to ask.

Hi Justin,
thanks for the advice/info...I got the quote for the upgrade it'll be 435 Canadian after tax (Just curious if we order the upgrade will it upgrade to 7.1? or do we need to get that seperate, I was confused by your wording).
As for the setup my employer hasn't used Logic at all in a professional setting. He had 5.0 Platinum in case any of his clients needed it however that hasn't been the case, he said it was working fine though. As for Pro Tools, his setup the one I mentioned above, has been rock solid all the way up to 10.3.9 (which he has on two of his other editing sweets). So hopefully that will be the case for Logic as well. I've told him that I think he'll need to address the RAM issue as I'm sure he'll be suprise how quick Sculpture etc eat up the RAM.
My main concern was wether running Logic not using the 'built in audio' driver but rather say the Pro Tools interface would be incompatible, hope that makes sense I haven't done any Pro Tools with Logic set ups before so the wording may wrong. Thanks for the reply though, cheers,
Graham

Optimal Hard Drive Configuration for Premiere Pro CS5 and Pro Tools

I am in the process of upgrading a workstation that is used primarily for multi-track audio recording in Pro Tools to use the following Adobe CS5 products for production of promotional videos in HDV (and AVCHD for the web) as well as printed marketing materials for bands and musicians: Premiere Pro, Encore, Photoshop, Illustrator and Soundbooth.
Since Premiere Pro is probably the most demanding application of the group, I have been studying the suggested hardware configurations on this forum with great interest, particularly HARM's suggestions (including his Generic Guideline for Disk Setup) to determine which hard drives to purchase and the optimal manner in which to configure them.
I am upgrading an HP Z800 with dual quad core 2.44 GhZ processors with hyperthreading (16 virtual cores), 12 GB of memory and an overclocked GeForce GTX 470. Without setting up a RAID configuration (which I cannot afford at the moment), I would like to use the 4 available HDD bays in the Z800 in the optimal manner for Premier Pro, using currently available drives. I am currently considering purchasing a 300GB VelociRaptor to use as my C drive because of the extended load times and demands placed on the drive by ProTools and the associated Waves plug-ins.
I would appreciate suggestions to improve my following plan: C (300GB WD VelociRaptor) for OS and Programs; D (1 TB WD Black Caviar) for Media and Projects; E (1 250 GB WD Black Caviar) for Pagefile (approx. 18 GB) and Media Cache; and E (2 TB WD Black Caviar) for Previews, Exports and Pro Tools audio files.
I have great respect for the knowledge of the members of this forum and eagerly await your suggestions.
/Bill

I very much appreciate the responses to my email because I know that all of your time is valuable and that you have chosen to use some of that valuable time to help an unknown individual. This forum is remarkable because of the wealth of knowledge available and the willingness of so many to assist others.
I now wish to narrow my questions to save you time and so that I can get specific advice. I may not have not been clear that I have already upgraded to the HP Z800 with dual quad core processors and overclocked GTX 470, primarily for the improved performance it will provide in ProTools. My question now is how to optimize its performance for Premiere Pro CS5. Based upon my research, I am considering the following two upgrades, but I am open to other suggestions if they would provide better results at a similar cost
1. I am considering purchasing a 600GB WD VelociRaptor ( WD6000HLXH) for my C drive on which I would place OS (Windows 7, 64 Bit) and programs in an effort to reduce loading times of large programs. I have two questions: (1) Are members of the forum seeing a significant improvment in program loading times with the VelociRaptor because I am still not convinced that the price performance of SSD's justifies their use; and (2) There are so many models of VelociRaptors now that I want to be certain that I am purchasing the best version for my needs. In addition to the usual 10000 RPM speed, this model has 32MB Cache and a 3.5" form factor as well as a SATA 6.0GB/s interface (which I doubt my motherboard can take advantage of but it might extend the useful life of the drive with future configurations).
2. I currently have available for installation in the Z800 the following drives: (1) WD 2TB Black Caviar; (1) WD 1TB Black Caviar; (2) Hitachi 1TB. I believe that the Z800 can accept up to 5 SATA hard drives which I will have if I purchase the Velociraptor. Although I am reasonably knowledeable when it comes to hardware, I have never set up a RAID configuration. Therefore, it would be helpful if someone could recommend one of the various RAID configurations and brieflyexplain why it would seem to be best for my needs. I can then focus my research on understanding that one configuration.
I was planning to follow Scott's suggestion for my current 3 drives: OS and programs on C (WD 600 GBVelociRaptor), media and projects on D (WD 1TB Black Caviar), export files and Pro Tools files (all live musician tracks, no samples) on E (WD 2TB Black Caviar). However, I have been reading about the benefits of a RAID configuration so I am interested in further suggestions now that I have clarified my questions.
Thank you all for your help.
Bill

Logic and Pro Tools

Hello all. I"ve got a few questions concerning Logic and Pro Tools. First, can you trigger Logic's sounds in Pro tools? ie Logic as the "slave" and Pro Tools as the "master" And can you record vocals into Logic using an MBox 2 or is there some other interface I need? If so, what would you suggest?
Thanks in advance for your time

You can use an Mbox2 with logic. If you already have pro tools, or plan on having it in addition to logic, thats what I would do, as both programs can use the mbox2. Although, they can't both use it at the same time. Which leads to this.
It is possible to have pro tools running using the mbox2 while logic is running, using your computers soundcard. I have done this, but I have found no real way to synch them. I've been looking at ways of syncing Logic and Pro Tools together on the same computer, and it seems to be not really doable, although I believe people have done it. A lot of people have one computer for Logic and one for Pro Tools and sync them together with time code, which works really well.
I'm really pretty new to logic, so I'm sure I dont have the best answers,
Good Luck!

Differences between standard and pro versions

I was reading the comparision of these two Acrobat versions and for Pro it says:
Edit and enhance photos to add to your PDF communications with Adobe Photoshop® CS5.
Quickly transform static PowerPoint slides into compelling, interactive PDF presentations with Adobe Presenter
Rapidly combine screen recordings, narration, video, slides, and more into a rich media experience with Adobe Captivate® 5
Does that mean that the Pro version includes Photoshop, Presenter and Captivate programs as well? Or, what are the differences? As an aside, the new look and feel of the Adobe website is confusing at best. Seems geared to being flashy, not useful.
Regards, David

Acrobat does not included those other packages. One of the pages that always struck me funny (maybe I have a twisted mind) but has this artistic background is the updates page. The background looks like a lacy bra to me. It is the first thing that comes to mind every time I see it. That is a problem with abstract images (that are typically unnecessary and waste bandwidth), that a lot is in the eye of the beholder. Actually, I have heard from many others that also see the bra.
OK, back to Acrobat. There are several aspects of Acrobat that allow you to have links to the other products built in, but they are not included. The page at http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobatpro/buying-guide.html?promoid=JIJYS provides some info, but a lot is missing. For instance there are differences with PDF Optimize and Reduce File Size I think (sorry, I do not have Std to check). One important one that is part of pro is the preflight option. Apparently Std does not include portfolios or allow PDF comparison according to the chart.
If you are into forms, then Std apparently will do them as AcroForms (my preference, partially because of familiarity), but does not include Designer if that was your preference. Some of the enabling for Reader is not available in Std. Also, Std does not allow embedding Flash. Std is limited for some of the products that include PDF Maker (not a big one for me, but might be important to you).
That is a quick summary based on the chart. However, be aware there are some other features that the chart does not seem to cover. For the difference between Std and Pro, I would suggest getting Pro. The big hit is the initial cost of the product, not the step up to Pro. In a business plan consider the time that might be wasted trying to do some of the things in Pro that are not in Std. Those are the types of issues to consider. Many folks consider the cost to be large, and for a small business it is. However, in the long term it may be worth the cost.
Keep in mind that many large CAD packages in engineering run about $30,000 for a single license, half the cost of the engineer that would use it. Some other tools are about $15,000. In that view, Acrobat is cheap (except for cheapskates like me).

Key figure diffrence in Dev and Pro

Hi Experts,
I have one cube in Dev and Production but key figure Current Price out put is difference in both
like dev it comes 30.12 and in production getting like 30,12.
but make sure i am using same keyfigure.
Thanks
David

Check the user default settings in SU01D tcode in dev and pro.
SU01D -> enter ur user id -> goto Default tab and check the decimal notation.
I guess it is 1,234,567.89 in DEV and 1.234.567,89 in PRO.
Please make sure that this setting is same in DEV and PRO.
you can ask your basis consultant to changes the settings....
--- Thanks...

Different Database Behavior for UAT and PRO in same DB

Hi All,
The UAT and Production Documentum schemas reside in the same database instance referring to different applications.
Problem is when I run the same query to production it send me result in a second but in UAT it takes for ever and also its shows the different plan if do explain in UAT and PRO.
OS windows 64Bit
DB 10.2.0.3
There is frequent, automated data load.
The indexes are rebuilt every other day.
SQL on UAT
select all dm_folder.r_object_id, dm_folder.object_name, dm_repeating.i_folder_id, dm_repeating.r_folder_path from dm_folder_sp dm_folder, dm_folder_rp dm_repeating where (dm_folder.r_object_id in (select all dm_repeating.i_ancestor_id from dm_folder_sp dm_folder, dm_folder_rp dm_repeating where ((dm_folder.r_object_id='0b01b3f18000b897') and (dm_folder.a_is_hidden=0)) and (dm_folder.i_has_folder = 1 and dm_folder.i_is_deleted = 0) and dm_repeating.r_object_id=dm_folder.r_object_id )) and (dm_folder.i_has_folder = 1 and dm_folder.i_is_deleted = 0) and dm_repeating.r_object_id=dm_folder.r_object_id order by dm_folder.r_object_id
Explain Plan on UAT
This sql ran forever. An execution plan was gotten for the SQL. Note the MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN with 404 million rows and 34 GB of data highlighted in red.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1131176958
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 132 | 21M (1)| 70:20:41 |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS SEMI | | 1 | 132 | 21M (1)| 70:20:41 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 15087 | 1723K| 21M (1)| 70:08:37 |
| 3 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 404M| 34G| 802K (1)| 02:40:32 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 9854 | 606K| 382 (1)| 00:00:05 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 22358 | 1026K| 381 (1)| 00:00:05 |
| 6 | INDEX FULL SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000109 | 26813 | | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 8 | BUFFER SORT | | 41065 | 1162K| 802K (1)| 02:40:32 |
| 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DM_FOLDER_R | 41065 | 1162K| 81 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_R | 1 | 25 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F18000010A | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12 | VIEW | VW_NSO_1 | 1 | 15 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2 | 190 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 14 | NESTED LOOPS | | 4 | 304 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 42 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000109 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_FOLDER_R | 4 | 136 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | DM_FOLDER_R_IND_UT | 4 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 21 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F18000010A | 1 | 19 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - filter("YB_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "YB_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
7 - access("YB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="OG_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
11 - access("ZB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="PG_"."R_OBJECT_ID" AND
"ZB_"."I_POSITION"="PG_"."I_POSITION")
filter("ZB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="YB_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
12 - filter("YB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="$nso_col_1")
16 - access("OG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897')
17 - filter("YB_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "YB_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0 AND "YB_"."A_IS_HIDDEN"=0)
18 - access("YB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897')
20 - access("PG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897')
21 - access("ZB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897' AND "ZB_"."I_POSITION"="PG_"."I_POSITION")
SQL on Production
The following sql was run through sqlplus on production. It is identical to the one run on UAT with the exception that a different r_object_id is used.
select all dm_folder.r_object_id, dm_folder.object_name, dm_repeating.i_folder_id, dm_repeating.r_folder_path from dm_folder_sp dm_folder, dm_folder_rp dm_repeating where (dm_folder.r_object_id in (select all dm_repeating.i_ancestor_id from dm_folder_sp dm_folder, dm_folder_rp dm_repeating where ((dm_folder.r_object_id='0b01b3f080011726') and (dm_folder.a_is_hidden=0)) and (dm_folder.i_has_folder = 1 and dm_folder.i_is_deleted = 0) and dm_repeating.r_object_id=dm_folder.r_object_id )) and (dm_folder.i_has_folder = 1 and dm_folder.i_is_deleted = 0) and dm_repeating.r_object_id=dm_folder.r_object_id order by dm_folder.r_object_id
Explain Plan on Production
This query ran very quickly. The query plan does not contain a MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3553258581
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5 | 650 | 10 (20)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 5 | 650 | 10 (20)| 00:00:01 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 5 | 650 | 9 (12)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 9 | 936 | 8 (13)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 234 | 7 (15)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 186 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | VIEW | VW_NSO_1 | 3 | 48 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 7 | HASH UNIQUE | | 3 | 279 | | |
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 279 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 9 | NESTED LOOPS | | 5 | 365 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 38 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11| INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13| INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000109 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 14| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_FOLDER_R | 5 | 175 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15| INDEX RANGE SCAN | DM_FOLDER_R_IND | 5 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16| INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F08000010A | 1 | 20 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 1 | 46 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18| INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000109 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19| INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_R | 3 | 78 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 21| INDEX RANGE SCAN | D_1F01B3F08000010A | 3 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_FOLDER_R | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 23| INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000144 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
11 - access("TGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726')
12 - filter("GJ_"."A_IS_HIDDEN"=0 AND "GJ_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "GJ_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
13 - access("GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726')
15 - access("VGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726')
16 - access("IJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726' AND "IJ_"."I_POSITION"="VGB_"."I_POSITION")
17 - filter("GJ_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "GJ_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
18 - access("GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="$nso_col_1")
19 - access("GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="TGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
21 - access("IJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
23 - access("IJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="VGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID" AND "IJ_"."I_POSITION"="VGB_"."I_POSITION")
Message was edited by:
user624068

I am gathering the statistics for the full database statement is .
execute dbms_stats.gather_database_stats(ESTIMATE_PERCENT => 99, CASCADE => TRUE)
I tried to gather the stats on schema but no effect.
No of indexes are same in UAT and Pro.
I am still confuse if we have less data do it change the plan and if it did it should be faster.
Thats the max it got format. is there any other way i can format that or send u.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3842135587
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 3 | 384 | 14M (1)| 47:28:20 |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS SEMI | | 3 | 384 | 14M (1)| 47:28:20 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 10269 | 1133K| 14M (1)| 47:20:08 |
| 3 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 273M| 22G| 541K (1)| 01:48:20 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 6648 | 383K| 412 (0)| 00:00:05 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 6648 | 279K| 411 (0)| 00:00:05 |
| 6 | INDEX FULL SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000109 | 26592 | | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 8 | BUFFER SORT | | 41076 | 1163K| 541K (1)| 01:48:20 |
| 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DM_FOLDER_R | 41076 | 1163K| 81 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_R | 1 | 25 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F18000010A | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12 | VIEW | VW_NSO_1 | 1 | 15 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2 | 182 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 14 | NESTED LOOPS | | 4 | 288 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 38 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000109 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_FOLDER_R | 4 | 136 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | D_1F01B3F180000144 | 4 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 21 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F18000010A | 1 | 19 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - filter("RG_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "RG_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
7 - access("RG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="WQ_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
11 - access("SG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="XQ_"."R_OBJECT_ID" AND
"SG_"."I_POSITION"="XQ_"."I_POSITION")
filter("SG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="RG_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
12 - filter("RG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="$nso_col_1")
16 - access("WQ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897')
17 - filter("RG_"."A_IS_HIDDEN"=0 AND "RG_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "RG_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
18 - access("RG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897')
20 - access("XQ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897')
21 - access("SG_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f18000b897' AND "SG_"."I_POSITION"="XQ_"."I_POSITION")
Production Explan
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3553258581
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5 | 650 | 10 (20)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 5 | 650 | 10 (20)| 00:00:01 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 5 | 650 | 9 (12)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 9 | 936 | 8 (13)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 234 | 7 (15)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 186 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | VIEW | VW_NSO_1 | 3 | 48 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 7 | HASH UNIQUE | | 3 | 279 | | |
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 279 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 9 | NESTED LOOPS | | 5 | 365 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 38 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 1 | 22 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000109 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 14 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_FOLDER_R | 5 | 175 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | DM_FOLDER_R_IND | 5 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F08000010A | 1 | 20 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_S | 1 | 46 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000109 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000143 | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_SYSOBJECT_R | 3 | 78 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 21 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | D_1F01B3F08000010A | 3 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DM_FOLDER_R | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 23 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | D_1F01B3F080000144 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
11 - access("TGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726')
12 - filter("GJ_"."A_IS_HIDDEN"=0 AND "GJ_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "GJ_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
13 - access("GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726')
15 - access("VGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726')
16 - access("IJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"='0b01b3f080011726' AND "IJ_"."I_POSITION"="VGB_"."I_POSITION")
17 - filter("GJ_"."I_HAS_FOLDER"=1 AND "GJ_"."I_IS_DELETED"=0)
18 - access("GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="$nso_col_1")
19 - access("GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="TGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
21 - access("IJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="GJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID")
23 - access("IJ_"."R_OBJECT_ID"="VGB_"."R_OBJECT_ID" AND "IJ_"."I_POSITION"="VGB_"."I_POSITION")
Message was edited by:
user624068

After 1 year earned leave should generate and pro-rata quota should generate next year on jan 1st.

Hi Experts,
Here is the client requirement and please let me know how to solve this.
Earned Leave: after 1 year earned leave should generate and pro-rata quota should generate next year on jan 1st.
Example: if employee joins on 01/07/2012 after 1 year i.e 01/07/2013 quota should generate 22 days next year on 01/01/2014 pro-rata quota i.e 01/07/2013, 11 days pro-rata quota should generate. Total 22+11 =33 have to generate on 01/01/2014. and next year 01/01/2015 (22+11+22)=55.
Note: on 1/7/2013 = 22 days
on 1/1/2014 = 11 days +22 days; total=33
on 1/1/2015 = 33 days +22 days; total=55
Conditions: if employee joins before 15th date of current month include the current month, if employee joins after 15th date exclude the current month.

You will need 2-3 PCRs to address this.
In one PCR you need to query the Date of Hire (from IT0041 - I guess you are maintaining this) using HRS=YDAYxx - where xx is the date type. You can then check it it is the first year anniversary or not by using HRS?01. If the condition satisfies populate a custom time type with 22 days.
In another PCR, you need to check for 01 Jan by using HRS=BCURMO and HRS=BCURDY. In this PCR check again the length of service (see above). If it is more than 1, then proceed to give the pro-rata amount.
If the pro-rata formula is simple you can use the second PCR or you would need a 3rd PCR to get the pro rata amount. Using HRS=Y**** operator you can query many date differences which will help.
Regards
Pramod

Disable or Hide Online Support menu option from: Reader, Acrobat Standard and Pro XI 11.0.2

Hi,
I'm trying to make a custom installation for 3 applications: Adobe Reader XI 11.0.2, Acrobat Std. and Pro XI 11.0.2 and most of the options that I wanted to hide are done with the Customization Wizard but I can't hide Online Support. I didn't found yet any FeatureLockDown for this option so far. So our users can still use the Online Support options.
Notice that I tried to drop a script into: C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Reader 11.0\Reader\Javascripts but when you 1st open the application it has a delay and somehow you still can access it. But if you try to open it again the menu is hidden.
//HideMenu.js
//Help - Online Support
app.hideMenuItem("OnlineSupport");
But a FeatureLockDown on HKLM hive will be the best way to disable this option as users don't have access to this registry hive and some advanced users with more rights could be able to delete the .js file if they know where it is saved.
I will appreaciate your help to get this FeatureLockDown option if it exists or an alternative way.
Thanks as usual and Kind regards everyone.
Derspinne.

Moved to Enterprise Deployment (Acrobat and Reader)

Acrobat 9 Reader and Pro extremely slow when loading.

Machine: Dell Precision T3500 with an Quad Core Intel® Xeon® W3540 2.93GHz, 8M L3, 4.8GT/s Turbo processor with Windows XP Pro 32-bit and 4GB RAM NECC 1066Mhz installed.
When installing, uninstalling, restarting, reinstalling Acrobat 9 Reader and Pro, or Acrobat 9.2 Reader and Pro, and upon opening a PDF double-clicked on opens Acrobat as expected but it would take an incredibly long time to open the PDF. Opening the application and then going to File, Open also recreates the effect. When the PDF opens, you can see vector drawings appear line by line as if running on a really old machine like a Pentium II and having the computer pause like as if it has frozen up until after waiting a minute or two. During that time, Windows XP is unresponsive until after waiting for the PDF file to load. Diffferent varieties of PDF with simple one-page text to complex PDF's with scanned, vector and hundreds of pages of text has both recreated the frozen in time effect. And when scrolling to different pages within a PDF, the scrolling is choppy, jerky, and at times, pauses to have drawings to appear.
In the past, applications behaving erratically in this fashion was traced down to the software incompatible with HyperThreading and multiple processors. Does anyone know if this might be the case with Xeon processor listed above or similar hardware? Has anyone else experience this? Information about a possible issue mentioned above after searching produced no hits both at Adobe or out there.
Thanks in advance.

Thanks for your input.
Installing only one or the other (Reader vs Pro and either 9 or 9.2) produced no improvement and the same delay.
Disabling malware applications and then uninstalling them one at a time also produced no improvement.
Disabling the HyperThreading feature within the BIOS/CMOS did not help.
The only workaround so far is to launch Adobe Reader or Pro first, go into Task Manager and then "Set Affinity..." and have only one check mark on any CPU from CPU 0 through CPU 7. Then either drag the PDF into the Adobe Reader or Pro, or go to File and then Open to load the PDF. This process was the only way so far to "normally" open and immediately view and scroll the PDF regardless of complexity without delays or freezes.
Has anyone else been able to reproduce the problem and test the workaround on similar hardware?
Thanks in advance.

Standard and Pro versions compatible with Windows 7

Hello
I am looking for a list of Adobe Acrobat Standard and Adobe Acrobat Pro that are compatible with Windows 7. We are upgrading over 1000 computers to Windows 7 and we have many different versions of Adobe Acrobat writer Stndard and Pro.
Thanks

There are also issues with 32 vs 64-bit systems. The latter requires updating your version in general. Generally the initial releases have not worked in the 54-bit environment. There are many driver issues with 64-bit systems and probably should look carefully if 64-bits are needed. The 64-bit system is useful if you are computationally focused, but may not be much of an advantage in standard office environments. Just be careful. If you are installing OFFICE 2010, then you need AAX for PDF Maker compatibility -- prior versions of Acrobat only allow printing from the OFFICE 2010 suite. Some folks have been successful with AA8 on 32-bit Win7 (I have only seen 1 post that would suggest success with 64-bit Win7). Prior versions of Acrobat can be made to work on 32-bit Win7 systems, but require work arounds (i.e., the AcroTray tool that automates the conversion to PDF process fails in Win7). The 64-bit system will probably fail for most of the earlier versions in such cases.
Realize that you may have to deal with Win8 shortly that has it's own issues.

Adobe Reader 9.3.4 and Pro Extended

I tried to upgrade to the 9.3.4 version of reader and it wouldn't let me for some reason. Something about a missing .msi file in one of the directories. So I used revo uninstaller to remove it and try to reinstall it. I redownloaded the program and the ran the Adobe Reader 9.3.4 Update - setup. It processes to 100 % and then closes. And nothing. so I don't know whats going on. I also downloaded the trial of Adobe Pro Extended and everything went fine up to the install screen. I click the install button and nothing happens, so no clue whats going on with that either. Any ideas?

I tried the first link to install reader and it simply runs to 100% and then closes.
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:43:37 -0600
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Adobe Reader 9.3.4 and Pro Extended
Can you try installing the same from the following locations:
ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/win/9.x/9.3.4/enu/AdbeRdr934_en_US.exe
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/tdrc/index.cfm?product=acrobat_pro_extended
P.S. The error message that you received while updating Adobe Reader was probably due to the fact that you may have deleted the cached setup files on your system. Hence, it was prompting you to provide the required installer file (.MSI file)
>

CAD interface and PRO-E interface

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for