Can we report on 2 fact tables

Hi All,
We have 2 star schema's. Lets say Star A and Star B. In both we have a Common dimension Dim D.
As we can see now we have a connection between Star A and Star B with the same Dim D, Like Star A -> DimD < - Star B.
So, When I try to built a Answer using just Star A and Dim D it works good. If I do same kind with Star B and Dim D then it works.
But, my issue is when I use Star A Dim D and any other from Star B it does not show data for last used Star.
If start my Answer with Star A then only data for Star A is shown and Star B columns has no data.
Same if I start with Star B then only data for star B is shown and Star A columns has no data. I want to know is there any other join or something I'm missing in patching up 2 star schemas.
Any pointers are highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Vijay

This question has been answered dozens of times in the forums. Use the forum search and look through the search results.
http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#before

Similar Messages

Transaction data can be loaded into the Fact table without loading the

Transaction data can be loaded into the Fact table without loading the corresponding master data (Example : Sales analysis transaction data can be loaded without populating any of its dimensions master data)
a. True
b. False

Hi Kutti,
True - You need to select the option in the infopackage - alwyas load even if no master data exists.
Bye
Dinesh

How can we report on R/3 tables using SAP BO

How can we report on R/3 tables using SAP BO.
Thanks

Hi
you can use the CR Designer and build CR reports that access your R/3 system. Another option is to use the R/3 connector for the Data Federator which is available in the Innovation Center. Still this connector is not a product rather can be used on your own risk.
Regards,
Stratos
PS: Accessing directly the tables of the underlying database(e.g oracle) using universes and Web Intelligence is not recommended. You will not be able to decode all contents of the database tables you are accessing since in some cases R/3 encodes the data before storing them in the actual database tables.

How can build BMM with multiple fact tables

HI Gurus,
I have 4 fact tables and 18 Dimension table. Dimension tables have links with multiple fact tables. i have created physical joins in Physical layer. Now my questions is how can i create Business Model with multiple fact tables.
i mean should i create 4 fact tables as logical tables and logical keys ? Then i have to move all dimension tables in to Business model?
i am new to OBIEE. i gone through tutorial it is showing with one fact and multi dimension table. Should i do follow same style with multi fact tables.
Please help me. Thanks in advance for your support.

Thanks for your response.
I had drag all tables from the phisical layer to Business Model. then i have deleted all links and recreated complex joins with default values.
now i have some revenue amont columns in fact tables.
my question is should i should i create aggregation ( like Sum..) for those columns? is it must ?
please let me know thank you very much

Report based on fact tables that don't have the same dimensionality

Hi all
I want to combine in the same report different measures from different fact tables that doesn't have the same dimensionality,for example:
measure 1 linked to dimensions : time geography and product
measure 2 linked to dimensions : time and geography
Currenctly when I create a report like:
time----gepgraphy---product------measure 1-----measure 2 I don't have any data for measure2 because it's not linked to the product dimension.
The exact report is year---store name---product area name----- store sales-----number of visitors : the number of vistors doesn't have any relation with the product dimension.
Is there a way to create this kind of report??
Regards

Don't take this the wrong way guys, but I feel compelled to say this before the answers start coming in:
This issue had been discussed already many times. Stijn, John, Kishore etc. have all answered this question for the one or the other user. This forum has a search functionality for a reason. To first look for information and then ask your question. Why wait - potentially - a couple of hours for an answer that's one search away?
Seriously people. It's not like forums magically appeared in 2k7...they've been around for quite a while now and netiquette and common sense with regards to posting should become normal.
Cheers,
C.

Join multiple fact tables and dimensions and use all tables in report issue

Hi,
I have a report requirements and need to use multiple fact tables and unconformed dimensions as described below
Fact table: F1,F2,F3
Dimensions tables: D1.....D9
F1:(joined to) D1,D2,D3,D4
F2::(joined to)D1,D2,D5,D6
F3::(joined to)D1,D2,D7,D8
D7::(joined to)D9,D8 (dimension D7 joined to two other dimensions D9 and D8
I'm trying to use columns from almost all the fact and dimension tables but getting "Unable to navigate requested expression. Please fix the metadata consistency warnings."
Repository is consistent and no errors and warnings.
How can I configure the repository to develop reports using all fact tables and dimensions?
Appreciate for your help.
Thanks
Jay.
Edited by: Jay on Feb 9, 2012 4:14 PM

So you want me to convert snowflake schema to star. does it solve my problem? individual star queries are working find but when I query multiple stars together getting inconsistency errors. I removed content tables dim level totals for unconformed dimensions in logical fact LTS and set level for measures at total level for unconformed dimensions. it is still in progress and need to test.
Thanks
Jay.

OBIEE report from multiple facts at different levels

Currently we need to develop a report with columns from 3 different facts surrounded with conformed and non conformed dimensions at different levels.
After setting the hierarchial levels and putting the facts into single logical table with different sources OBIEE is generating 2 different queries and does a full outer join.
I would like to know how we can do a left outer join instead of full outer join between the 2 queries based on a common column?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Vinod,
The scenario provided in the link above doesnt match to my issue.
We need to develop a report from multiple fact tables at different levels with conformed & non conformed dimension columns.
I have 7 dimensions D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6 and D7 & two fact F1 and F2 tables.
F1 is tied to dimensions D1,D2,D3,D4,d5
F2 is tied to dimensions D3,D4,D5, D6 and D7.
In my report I have columns from D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, F1 and F2.
So OBIEE generates 2 queries with columns from D1,D2,D3,D4,d5 & F1 measure and another query with D3,D4,D5, D6, D7 and F2 measure.
and then does a cross fact join out of box between 2 queries.
But I need to do a left outer join between the 2 queries on a common column instead of cross fact join. I would like to know how we can achive this.
Thanks.

Reg: Using Multiple fact tables in the RPD!

Hello everyone,
Can I get some help with the following scenario?
We use OBIEE 11g.
We have a report that uses only 1 fact table to retrieve the data and it takes hell lot of time to bring up the data in the report.
My question here is is there a way to bring up the performance of the report if we split the data in 1 fact table to 2 fact tables and make the report use the 2 fact tables.
Are there any other ways of tuning the report for better performance.
Thanks for the help in advance!
Ajay.

Hi Ajay,
Follow the following steps for the tuning;
1. Try to tune the SQL query first generated by the report, and make necessary changes. (Put indexes on required column so that your query is scanning the index instead of entire table)
2. You can try to create agg fact table and use the agg navigation for improving the performance. (Idea is to reduce the data set on which sql is fired)
3. You can try to create partitions on the FACT table in the DB and so that required partitions are queried as per filters.
4. In the Last if all the above doesn't tune your query you can try splitting the FACT table in to TWO or More as per your decision and then use fragmentation content in the BMM layer of the RPD so it will hit appropriate tables as per you report.
Mark Correct/Helpful if it helps.
Best of Luck,
Kashi

None of the fact tables are compatible

hi,
am developing report from two fact table columns and one dimension table in obiee 11.1.1.5.0.
am getting error
Error
View Display Error
Odbc driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
Error Details
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14020] None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request Fact - Retail.Retail. (HY000)
SQL Issued: SELECT 0 s_0, "TM Vehicle Sales"."- Offtake Facts"."Offtake" s_1, "TM Vehicle Sales"."- Retail Facts"."Retail" s_2, "TM Vehicle Sales"."Distributor"."Country" s_3 FROM "TM Vehicle Sales"
regards
vcm

need to see your design, dim is shared between the facts?
I think you can assume the physical query based on your columns selection..
Now pick one column from 1st fact and 2nd column from dim run a report, get physcial query and verify the joins with obiee and your own query.
then add column from 2nd query see how it works
Edited by: svee on Jun 29, 2012 6:21 AM

Error VLD-0917 (unknown error) while deploying FACT table

Hi,
I keep getting this error while trying to deploy a FACT table:
VLD-0917: An unknown error occured while generating <fact table name>.
An unknown error occurred while generating <fact table name>. Error details: java.lang.NullPointerException.
Do yo know what can it be? This fact table was linked to a Dimension that I modified (added one more level to its hierarchy). Since I did this change, the fact table cannot be validated.
This happens to all fact tables that use this dimension. I created a new cube with the new definition of the dimension and had no trouble at all. I disassociate the dimension from existing cubes and they validate OK. What could be happening?
I would appreciate any help you could provide.
Regards,
--oswaldo.
[osantos]

Hi,
I realized that I'm getting this error for all fact tables. I cannot deploy any of them. What could be happening? I have a dimension that is linked to all facts which I changed recently: had to redefine its default hierarchy as a value-based one. I don't know if this affected my cubes.
Any idea what might be happening here?
Best Regards,
--oswaldo.
[osantos]

Fact Table and Dimension Tables

Hi Experts, I'm creating custom InfoCubes for data coming from non-SAP source systems. I have two InfoCubes. Tha data is coming from like 10 tables. I have 10 DataSources created fo this and the data will be consolidated in Standard DSO before it will flow into 2 InfoCubes.
Now client wants to know before how much data will be there in InfoCubes in Fact table nad Dimension tables in both the InfoCubes. I have the total size of all the 10 tables from the sources given to me by the DBA. I wan not sure how I can convert that info for Fact table and Dimension table as I have not yet created these Infocubes.
Please help me with this on how I should address this.

hi,
The exact data will be hard to give however you can reach at a round figure in your case.
You are consolidating the data from the tables that means that there is relation between the tables. Arrive at a rough figure based on the relation and the activity you are performing while consolidating the data of the tables.
For example, let us say we want to combine data for sales order and deliveries in a DSO.
Let Sales order has 1000 records and Delivery has 2000 records. Both the tables have a common link (Sales Order).In DSO you are combining the data that means the data will be at the most granular level consist of Delivery data, so the maximum no of records which the consolidated DSO can have is 2000.
regards,
Arvind.

Create Report Painter using LIS table

Hi Expert,
I'n new in ECC version but I found we can create report painter using LIS table,
but I'm not success to create report without error or debug
Anybody have the documentation about it ? or tell me how it works ...
Please ..urgent...need to tell client about it..
Thanks

Hi,
I have not worked on it but you can try this out:
TCODE for report writer table is GRCT.
There You need to add your z fields in some pre-defined structure like CCSS and then activate the structure and then activate characteristics.
NOTE: 24 charcter is max. length for the characteristics.
Regards,
Harsh.

SIDs are written in a Fact Table?

Hi,
Some experts told me that SIDs are written in a fact table in extended star schema model . I am not able to understand how SIDs can be written in a fact table. As per my understing fact table contains only keyfigure and Dimids ( foreign key).
Please explain.
Thanks.
Asim

Hello!
Basically you are right. Fact table holds only DIM-ID's and key figures. But if you set a dimension to line item (line item flag in cube definition) than no dimension table is created and SID is written directly into the fact table. Therefore a line item dimension can hold only one characteristic.
Hope that helps.
kind regards,
Peter

HOW CAN I HAVE DUMMY FACT TABLES IN ONE UNION REPORT

Hello developers,
So, I am trying to have a report from 4 different subject areas. Each of these have transaction numbers under Fact-table. B’se these fact tables are under different subject area I can’t have them in one report, (fact table has to be a one to many relationship and not otherwise). How do I make sure I end up with a transaction number from atleast 1 subject area and ignore the other ones or avoid the error
Also in addition, I have to have the last 4 digits of the credit card number which is located in only one of those 4 subject area. How do I make sure its included with my final report eventhough its not in other subject areas? Please please help I am still new in this business
thanks in advance
Chuck

You got two choices:
A. Use OBIEE:
1) Create a OBIEE logical SQL like
SELECT A.s0 field1, C.s2 field2, A.s1 Measure1, B.s1 Measure2, C.s1 Measure3
FROM
(Select "Txn Attributes"."Transaction Number" s0, Measure.Measure1 s1 FROM "Subject Area 1") A,
(Select "Txn Attributes"."Transaction Number" s0, Measure.Measure2 s1 FROM "Subject Area 2") B,
(Select "Txn Attributes"."Transaction Number" s0, Credit."Last 4 digits" s2, Measure.Measure3 s1 FROM "Subject Area 3")
WHERE A.s0 = B.s0
AND B.s0 = C.s0
2) Test this SQL from "Issue SQL" section in answers.
3) Once tested, open a new analysis, go to Advanced tab and put this tested logical SQL in the SQL section and apply it. If you come back to criteria tab, you will see 5 fields are created for you.
This is technically feasible. Pulling this off is hard and this is a maintenance nightmare.
Since you are self-proclaimed newbie, I would suggest you take the alternative: fixing it through ETL. Create a new fact and write an ETL job to load this fact from other facts and dimensions. Then model it in RPD. This is more work but if you mess something up in the process of implementing first option, you may need to apply nearly same effort to fix that. Choice is yours.

Fact table with 2 time keys, measures showing together in the same report

Hello,
I am using OBI EE and I have the following scenario: a fact table hold information about enquiries. An enquiry may or may not generate an appointment. So in my fact table I have two date columns: enquiry date and appointment booked date (not the date of the appointment itself, but when it was actually booked).
This raises a couple of questions. First question is: I can only have one logical FK to the Times table, how to create two LFKs for those 2 dates? Should I create a logical copy of the Times table in the BMM, along with another time dimension?
Second question is how to display both pieces of data in the same report. For instance, in a summary report per month I want to see the number of enquiries made and appointments booked in each month. Most likely they will be different numbers and refer to different rows in the database. What is the best way to model this in the BMM?
For instance, in October there were 10 enquiries, 8 of them were converted into appointments along with 3 enquires made in September. So, the report should show for October: number of enquires: 10, number of appointments: 11 (8 from October + 3 from September)
Sorry if this is a basic question but I couldn't find around any examples of this scenario.
Thanks,
Luis

Genius, that works perfectly, thanks!
Just one issue that I noticed... I have other dimensions on that fact table, one of them is "channel". Channel is linked to a column in the original fact table, as is Number of Enquiries.
If I include Channel in a report that shows Number of Enquiries and Number of Appointments, the Number of Appointments column only shows zeros, while the Number of Enquiries column still shows the correct numbers:
Month    Channel   Enquiries   Appointments
Jan 09   Email      100           0
         Phone      120           0
Feb 09   Email       87           0
...Then I figured out that I needed to add a PFK for all dimensions to the aliased fact table, not only for the times dimension.
Thanks again
Luis

Can we report on 2 fact tables

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for