Cannot assign changes to groups, only to single images

Since aperture 3.4.4. I cannot assign changes to selected groups of images. Changes are only accepted to single images, although groups are selected. Can anybody help me?

You may have set the "Primary Only flag" - uncheck the little button with the framed "1" or the menu option "Edit > Primary Only".
See my User Tip:
Keywords or ratings are applied only to one of the selected images - why?
Regards
Léonie

Similar Messages

Contact sheet only shows single image; need multiple duplicates

I'm trying to print an image using the "Contact Sheet" setting. I need to output a page containing multiple instances of one single image. When I select the image and select "Contact Sheet," it shrinks the single image down and sticks it in the top-left box of what should be a page full of that single image ... but it's only creating a single instance of the image, and the rest of the blocks on the contact sheet are blank.
I'm ready to put my fist through the monitor. Please help before it's too late. Thanks.

{quote:title=LarryHN wrote:}
In the customize window when you click the settings icon ther is a pull down menu in teh resulting screen that lets you select multiple photos pre page and multiples of a photo{quote}
Oh, how I do so wish that were the case, but when I click "Customize" and then get to the subsequent screen containing the "Settings" button, and then click said "Settings" button, I get, as previously stated, nothing but a dropdown that allows me to changes settings only for the text that one can select to accompany one's image, as shown in the screen capture found here:
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/1009048/iphoto-customize-settings.jpg

Assigning different record groups to a single LOV

I have an LOV named as ship_refrence and this is how i display
DECLARE
     a_value_chosen BOOLEAN;
BEGIN
     a_value_chosen := Show_Lov('ship_refrence');
END; and the corresponding query for
the RG1 is
SELECT ALL TBLOBLIGATION.MATID, TBLOBLIGATION.MATCODE, TBLOBLIGATION.DESCRIPTION,
TBLOBLIGATION.PARTNO, TBLOBLIGATION.DESCRIPTION1, TBLOBLIGATION.PARTNO1, TBLOBLIGATION.MANUFACTURER,
TBLOBLIGATION.NETYPE, TBLOBLIGATION.CAT2, TBLOBLIGATION.CAT3,
TBLOBLIGATION.CAT5, TBLOBLIGATION.CAT6, TBLOBLIGATION.CAT7, TBLOBLIGATION.COMMCODE,
TBLOBLIGATION.NSMCODE, TBLOBLIGATION.UNIT_TYPE_ID
FROM TBLOBLIGATION Now i have created
RG2
select matcode,description,partno1,description1,partno1 from tblobligation where cat2!='C'
RG3
select matcode,description,partno1,description1,partno1 from tblobligation where cat2='C'now the thing is I want my default LOV which has been using rg1 to use RG2 if the billtype is 'Send it to site' or else use RG3 if it is 'Send it to Consumed'
Edited by: Suhail Faraaz on Jan 29, 2011 12:35 AM

i have solved it.. by creating 3 different LOV for the record group and under when button pressed i have written this
Declare
     a_value_chosen BOOLEAN;
BEGIN
     if
          :shipbill.billtype
          in ('Send it to staff','Send it to store','send it to repair','Received from staff','Received from site','Received from store','Received from STC')
          then
     a_value_chosen := Show_Lov('ship_refrence');
     else
     if :shipbill.billtype='Send it to site'
          then
          a_value_chosen :=Show_Lov('RG_SITE');
     else
          if
               :shipbill.billtype ='Send it to consumed'
               then
                    a_value_chosen :=Show_Lov('RG_CONSUMED');
     end if;
     end if;
     end if;
END;
END;

Cannot Save Changes in Library - Help!

I still cannot save changes I make to a library image back to
the library. I open library, drag the image to the stage, make a
change ... and then it just sits there. Nothing in the library
changes, nothing I do can make the original image in the library
take the changes. I've tried saving as, exporting, creating a new
image (it will not allow me to give it the same name as an existing
library image .. the one I want to change).
I suspect some bug in Flash since I re-installed it on a new
laptop. It worked before. I have tried re-installing it and have
the latest updates from Flash site.
Any ideas???

OK, never mind, I figured it out ... it was my unfamiliarity
with Flash, I rarely do anything there. I had selected the "open as
library" command which does not permit editing. Instead I needed to
open the fla file, then choose Library from the Window menu
Duh.

Sales Office and Sales Group cannot be changed

Hi folks,
when i create a sales doc. based on a billing doc./sales doc., the sales units - sales ortgn, dist. channel, division, sales office and sales group are copied onto the newly created doc.
Sales orgtn, distr. channel and division are coming in grey mode or in disable mode which cannot be changed.
But Sales office and sales group are changeable..
Is there any way to make these two fields i.e Sales Office and Sales Group also in grey mode / disable mode or unchangeable mode.
thanx in advance,
Sourav

hello, friend.
try using SHD0 to create your own screen variant for the sales order. just follow the on-screen instructions. look for Sales Office and Sales Group (if any) and check the box making manual entries not possible. after you save the variant, assign this to your order type and test.
regards.

4.0.8.2.4 Cannot start listener after changing user/group to nobody/nobody

Installed OAS 4.0.8.2.4 and configured it. Everything is working fine with listener, plsql cartridge, Java cartridge and OSSWA. But if change listener's user/group from Oracle/Dba to nobody/nobody. Listener will not start. It hangs in as follows:
========================================================================
Information: Listening on NORM port 80 address 0.0.0.0
Information: wriorProcessInit: RMProxy IOR Bootstrap Service initialized
Information: Adapter services initialized successfully
Information: The server started successfully
Server now running as process 15654
OWS-08850: Oracle Web Listener 'www' started.
Oracle Web Listener 4.0.8.2.4 Enterprise Edition - Release (Domestic)
Copyright (c) Oracle Corporation 2000. All rights reserved.
Information: Listening on NORM port 5502 address 0.0.0.0
Information: wriorProcessInit: RMProxy IOR Bootstrap Service initialized
===========================================================================
from the message above, we can see if it failed to start the "Adapter services"
If we change the user/group back to Oracle/Dba, it starts fine.
And also, we have under $ORACLE_BASE/admin, the listener ( name devl ) permission has been changed accordingly to the user/group change. We follow the instruction from OAS configuration to change user/group.
( Read access to the configuration file
Read access to all files that provide content for servicing requests
Read access to all imagemap files
Execute access to all Oracle Application Server binaries and program files that the Web Listener must execute
Write access to the log and error files
Read access to user directories )
Thanks.

Thanks. After a few more days testing. We finally figure out where it went wrong. We changed user/group from node manager. ( from Oracle/dba, installer, to nobody/nobody). After that, we only changed $ORACLE_BASE/admin/ows/SITE_name/httpd-host_name/listener_name to be read and write accessed by nobody. We forgot to change owl.cfg to be read access to nobody/nobody. After we changed that. It starts fine.
Thanks again.

Account assignment category cannot be changed for limit items

HI all,
I am getting same error in RZ20
Instance POXXXXX of object type PurchaseOrder cou ld not be changed
Purchase order still contains faulty items
Account assignment category cannot be changed for limit items
PO is created with service item and it is in backend.
When it is changed it is giving error. User is added contract no# on change version.
Could you please share the solution...

sometimes sap throws unwanted error messages. these are example notes
415346 ME21n, ME456 when filling the account assignment type
411883 ME21N, ME456 when filling the account assignment category
403537 PO from PReq with different account assignment type: E456
Using Transaction ME21N,you create a purchase order for external service and add a new item by copying a request for quotation. If the request for quotation does not have a plant, when you enter the assignment category, the system displays error message ME456 "Account assignment category cannot be changed for limit items". Also there is no account assignment change involved.
Additional key words
what exactly you are trying to change the carts?

Cannot change BBM group details/setting, on BES

Hi All,
I'm newbie forgive if I wrongly put this question in this thread..
After updating to latest asia firmware (666), suddenly I cannot change BBM group detail on my torch (9800). Therefore, now I always get unwanted notification/update from new group that I recently join.
I am on BES, using a provider in Indonesia.
Any solution for this? I just want to turn off group notification..
Many thanks

Hmm... still no answer? Is it too specific?

Cannot make changes to the contents of this read-only folder

I recently got a new laptop and loaded Office 2013. We have three inboxes in Outlook and are using Cox IMAP. I get the following message when I try to delete emails from the primary inbox "Cannot make changes to the contents of this read-only
folder". Emails can be deleted from the other folders with no problem.
Does anyone know what could be causing this and how to fix it?

Hi
As per the information and details provided by you, to solve the problem of Outlook inbox folder, please follow these steps: -
Step 1: - If you are unable to delete all emails from a given Outlook folder, most likely that folder is locked.
Restarting Windows should fix it.
Step 2: - If you are unable to delete only some emails, then your
Outlook data file might be corrupted.
Step 3: -
Empty your Deleted items mail folder, then try again to delete emails.
Step 4: -
Hard deletes the selected emails – While the emails are highlighted/selected, keep the
Shift key pressed and hit the Delete key.
Step 5: -
Restart Outlook in Safe Mode and try deleting the emails from there.
Step 6: -
Edit the culprit email (Actions > Edit Message), save it back and try to delete it.
I hope this information will be helpful for you.
Thanks and regards
Shweta@G

BBP purchase order cannot be changed in R/3. Can only be displayed.

Hi,
(1) I am trying to changes the Payment term in the PO from 0012 to 0000.
But getting error as "BBP purchase order cannot be changed in R/3"
(2) As Invoice is already booked against this PO. I feel the change Payment terms will not come in the picture.
If I want to change the payment terms as well as it should come in the consideration for payment. Then what can be done? what is the way forward?
Thanks in advance.
Pradeep S Yekunde

plz check the settings in spro > material management > purchasing > purchase order > define screen layout at document level.
here you plz check the settings for aktv and me22n for "terms of delivery and payment".
check whther it is optional entry or not.
regards
jash

Generated analysis authorization cannot be changed

Hello all,
did someone manage to edit/delete generated (from DSO) analysis authorizations? When I want to correct a typo in one of the generated analysis authorizations it is not possible although the system is telling that it should be possible to do so. I did not find any note or thread yet.
Message number RSEC292:
Diagnosis text
A generated authorization can be changed (this message is only a warning ), but one should be sure that this authorization is not generated again. Then it will be removed from the user, created again (perhaps with different content), and if there no fixed name was generated, it is renamed.
Thanks in advance for your inputs

Hello Lana,
this is how SAP solved the problem
Bye Petra
Spezifikation: Message RSEC292: Generierte Analyseberechtigungen können nic
Short text:
Message RSEC292: Generierte Analyseberechtigungen können nic Langtext
It is not possible to change from DSOs generated analysis
authorizations although the system is telling that it should be
possible to do so. Authorizations are sufficient (SU53; SAP_ALL)
Message number RSEC292:
Diagnosis text
A generated authorization can be changed (this message is only a
warning ), but one should be sure that this authorization is not
generated again. Then it will be removed from the user, created again
(perhaps with different content), and if there no fixed name was
generated, it is renamed.
Here is the communication path (please read from below):
09.07.2007 - 09:03:36 CET Petra King Info für SAP
Hello Ms. ,
I always was telling about one issue:
Change of generated analysis authorization is not possible.
Since BI 7.0 we are talking about analysis authorizations so the
transaction code used is obvious.
There is no need for furhter information because it is only this single
issue: I guess that it should be an error message and not a warning
message and SAP made a mistake here by using the wron message category.
I was never talking about users and xxxxxx is not an user but an
analysis authorization.
Please consider the call a solved - in the meantime I got
professional support from the SDN platform.
Regards,
Petra King
05.07.2007 - 09:14:22 CET SAP Antwort
Hello Ms King,
I must say that I find this message quite incomprehensible. First you
write that you are irritated because my colleague asked you which
transaction is being used to generate authorizations. This information
is necessary so that the message can be assigned to the appropriate
area. Indeed, the message was incorrectly sent to BC-SEC. Next you
write that you are angry when I give you a consulting note regarding
generation of analysis authorizations. I am mystified as to how such
information from customers should help us in solving a technical or
procedural probem. I have read the message from the beginning and
there is very little technical and procedural information. Moreover, itis not clear what the "error" is here. The message RSEC292 is a warning(as clearly stated in the long text of the message) and this should not
hinder the process. Lastly, in your last info you refer to a specific
user, xxxxxxxx, as an example of a generated authorization. This is
separate issue than the original:
It is not possible to change from DSOs generated analysis
authorizations although the system is telling that it should be
possible to do so. Authorizations are sufficient (SU53; SAP_ALL)
So in response to the original inquiry regarding RSEC292. The answer,
as I have already mentioned and as stated in the text, is that this
is just for information purposes. Please continue with the process.
If you have a separate inquiry regarding the authorizations of
particular users, please open a second message. We request that
customer log one issue per message. Please read note 375196:
Separate message for new problem/subsequent problem
Regards,
Senior Support Consultant
SAP Active Global Support
Netweaver Business Intelligence
03.07.2007 - 15:14:39 CET Petra King Info für SAP
Hello ,
can you please contact the Basis Administrator xxx via phone
(+xxxxx) so he can open the line and provide you with the
user and password for system xxxxx.
Please note that the error occurs on xxxx and you can have a look at the
analysis auth. xxxxxxxx as representive for one of the generated
authorizations.
03.07.2007 - 15:08:43 CET Petra King Info für SAP
Hello ,
I am getting angry because note 1052242 is a documentation and I
executed everything besides the fact that the analysis auths cannot be
changed. Please read the error message from the beginning.
Regards,
Petra King
28.06.2007 - 14:52:09 CET SAP Antwort
Hello Ms King,
Please excuse the delay in the processing of your message.
Please read note 1052242 if you have not already done so. If this note
does not help you to solve the problem, I would like to have a look at
the situation on your system. Please open the R/3 Support connection
provide me with a user and password. This information can be stored
in the log on information of this message.
Regards,
Senior Support Consultant
SAP Active Global Support
Netweaver Business Intelligence
25.06.2007 - 08:48:03 CET Petra King Info für SAP
Hello ,
if this is in the wrong queue, yes please forward it to the appropriate
queue and please let the question be answered asap.
Thanks,
Petra King
21.06.2007 - 07:47:29 CET SAP Info für Kunde
Hello Petra,
it is possible to generate authorizations in PFCG too. As RSECADMIN
belongs to BW-BEX-OT-OLAP-AUT, I forward your message accordingly.
Best regards
Support Consultant
Global Support Center Austria
Netweaver Web Application Server ABAP
20.06.2007 - 09:54:47 CET Petra King Info für SAP
Hello ,
sorry to let you know so late but there was a typo in my email address
xxxxxinstead of xxxxxxxxx
Your question is a little bit irritating. Generation of analysis
authorizations in 7.0 is usually done only with transaction code
RSECADMIN - correct me if there is another possibility. Generation
works fine but the authorizations cannot be edited after then.
Bye,
Petra
23.05.2007 - 11:53:16 CET SAP Antwort
Dear Ms. King,
please let me know which transaction code do you use or in which
transaction do you get this message.
Best Regards
Support Consultant
SAP Active Global Support - Netweaver Web Application Server

Policy Assignment to AD Groups

Perhaps I'm going about this the wrong way, but can someone explain if this should work or not?
I have ZESM 4.1 IR 1 installed on a Windows 2003 server with a seperate SQL box - all installed and configured fine.
Created a user source pointing at AD, and have a single OU set up with 2 groups that I want to assign the policies to. When I open up a policy and click on the publish tab, I can expand down the AD tree to the OU and can see the relevant groups I've created.
If I then add a user to one of the groups then attempt to publish a policy to the group, the ZESM Management Console says "Policy Assignment Complete", however, if I then right click on the agent on the taskbar and "Check for Update", its saying there is "No Policy Update at this time"
If I assign the policy directly to the user, then it works correctly.
Am I missing something?
The reason I want to restrict it to a single OU and specific named groups is because we've had issues in the past with multiple admins in the system overwriting users policy assignments so I want to try and control policy assignments as much as possible.

Hum, I think you're out of luck.
At least with 3.5 it doesn't refreshes group memberships once they're added to the DB. So, group memberships are only "read" at directory configuration time. You can try this by deleting and re-creating the directory config once you update the group memberships and see if they publish to the correct users.
However, I haven't tried this with the current 4.1. Good news are, this issue is addressed in ZCM/ZESM 11, since we'll be using the LDAP configuration that comes with ZCM.
HTH,
Daniel
>>>
From: andystewartSL<[email protected]>
To:novell.support.zenworks.endpoint-security-management
Date: 8/3/2010 5:16 AM
Subject: Re: Policy Assignment to AD Groups
Forgot to mention, the plan is, if any users are added/removed from the
groups then the policy would be re-published to the group - I'm assuming
this will work also?
Andy Stewart - Somewhere In Scotland
zcm 10.2.2, 4 servers in esx vm environment, 2000 users so far...
(i'd still rather be snowboarding)
andystewartSL's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=1054
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=417317

Provisioning multiple AD Groups from a Single Privilege

Experts,
We're encountering a situation here when we provision to multiple Active Directory groups from a single IDM Role.
The scenario is this:
We have a workflow that has multiple conditional and switch tasks that result in the provisioning of users to Active Directory 2008 (mixed mode) Our workflow uses the provisioning framework and all users have been granted the ONLY privilege for the system.
The workflow will result in adding the users to multiple AD groups sometimes two AD groups that are associated with a single IDM role. The first assignment always works, the second does simply does not occur, no entry in the system or job log although IDM does show that the role has been assigned with an 'OK' status.
We've accomplished a workaround by redesigning the workflow so that only single roles are assigned at a time and using chain result OK links to move from one provisioning activity to another, but frankly, we are unsatisfied with this. IDM should be handling this much better through
I'm wondering if we have a pending value floating out there and we should just be applying the pending value at the end of every AD group add.
Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Matt

Matt,
In your post you mention "I'm wondering if we have a pending value floating out there and we should just be applying the pending value at the end of every AD group add"... I'm faced with a similar issue were I'm left pending values for privileges after the group is assigned.
I've imported the AD groups as privileges. I assign them without issue. But when I review the assignments I can see that each corresponding privilege assignment now has a pending value. I can not remove the privilege from the user at this point.
Have you seen this before? Any suggestions on how I can clean this up. BTW, I'm using the SAP PF basically unchanged...
Thanks!

Exchange Connector 3.0 (Hotfix Release) Error - Error Message=The key value of an object cannot be changed.

Hello,
I am running Service Manager 2012 with the Exchange Connector 3.0 RTM (Re-release Version). The issue I have is that when an e-mail is processed that is trying to update the status or event log of an incident, the Exchange Connector encounters an error
and will not update the object. The Operations Manager log denotes:
Exchange Connector: Unable to process mail item. Subject="Close Ticket: [IRXXXXX]", Error Message=The key value of an object cannot be changed.
This will happen on a seemingly random selection of Incident work items. I cannot correlate them with a specific template, exchange connector, or incident tier queue that could be causing the issue. I can recreate the way a specific ticket
was created and update it through e-mail without issue, and the next ticket can cause the error to trigger.
I have already opened a Microsoft Support Case using our Software Assurance agreement. After a few months of troubleshooting the issue and trying different fixes, Microsoft support said they were unable to fix the problem and that we would need to
purchase Premier support to go further. At this point I thought I would reach out to the community for ideas.
The setup I have for the Exchange connectors is as follows.
I have three separate Exchange connectors set up to three different mailboxes. One Exchange connector processes external support tickets and applies a specific template. Another processes client support tickets and applies a different template.
And the last Exchange connector processes internal tickets and also processes the updates of tickets created by the other two exchange connectors.
Here are the fixes I've attempted so far:
1. Changed the templates that each Exchange connector applies.
2. Changed the management pack that each template is stored in.
3. Checked my management pack(s) for extended classes by searching for Extension="true" (This was also checked by Microsoft support)
4. Deleted each Exchange connector and recreated each connector
5. Deleted each Exchange connector, deleted the management pack, and reinstalled the management pack and connectors
6. Repeated Step 5, deleted Microsoft.SystemCenter.ExchangeConnector.dll and Microsoft.SystemCenter.ExchangeConnector.resources.dll and then installed the Exchange connector Re-release version 3.0 Published 10/7/2013 (which is supposed to address this
issue)
7. Deleted the HealthServiceState folder and restarted the Management Service
I'm not really sure what to do at this point. I've put many hours into customizing my installation to get it working for my organization so reformatting and starting from scratch would be a nightmare scenario. This environment is in production.
I do have a band-aid in place using Orchestrator. Basically I have a monitor task searching for the error message and when it finds one it searches the mailbox for the offending e-mail and applies either the Resolve or Close status change that is requested
from the user. However, I do not have it working to update the ticket if a comment is applied to the incident. If anyone is in this position and needs to know how to apply this Orchestrator task I am willing to provide my workflow.
I am new to the community and am already impressed with the amount of help and effort there is in this forum. I appreciate in advance any help that is provided and am open to any ideas at this point. I can post more information as needed.
Thank you,
John

Yes that is the whole template. However, I did confirm that this is only happening to incidents where either of two situations triggers a runbook to fire and modify the incident. When I remove the activity from the incident it does clear the
issue. For some background the first Runbook Activity set's the first response date when an incident is resolved if the first response value is null. The second assigns the incident to a user upon creation if the title contains assignto:username;
1.)
<ObjectTemplate ID="Template.d33b5bbcaf3c49b18d8b72bc1e5e1ee4" TypeID="IncidentManagement!System.WorkItem.Incident.ProjectionType">
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/Escalated$">False</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/NeedsKnowledgeArticle$">False</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/HasCreatedKnowledgeArticle$">False</Property>
<Object Path="$Context/Path[Relationship='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItemContainsActivity' TypeConstraint='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity']$">
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/RunbookId$">4085f0da-ab83-48e5-bbe3-1f3b5fa2dc4a</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/TemplateId$">Template.d33b5bbcaf3c49b18d8b72bc1e5e1ee4</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/IsReadyForAutomation$">True</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/PropertyMapping$"><?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?>
<ParameterMapping xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<ParameterList>
<RunbookParameterItem>
<Name>Get RA Guid</Name>
<Id>344b15effc1a44528e517c5b4227179c</Id>
<Type>String</Type>
<Value>Generic::Id</Value>
<Direction>In</Direction>
<ContextInfo />
</RunbookParameterItem>
</ParameterList>
<RunbookId>4085f0da-ab83-48e5-bbe3-1f3b5fa2dc4a</RunbookId>
</ParameterMapping></Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItem.Activity']/ChildId$">1906</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItem.Activity']/Status$">$MPElement[Name='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!ActivityStatusEnum.Active']$</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItem.Activity']/Skip$">False</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Library!System.WorkItem']/Title$">Set First Response on Resolve</Property>
</Object>
</ObjectTemplate>
2.)
<ObjectTemplate ID="Template.b311e1f9126e4e19bbbbeb65ddb220ba" TypeID="IncidentManagement!System.WorkItem.Incident.ProjectionType">
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/Escalated$">False</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/Status$">$MPElement[Name='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!IncidentStatusEnum.Active']$</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/NeedsKnowledgeArticle$">False</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Incident_Library!System.WorkItem.Incident']/HasCreatedKnowledgeArticle$">False</Property>
<Object Path="$Context/Path[Relationship='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItemContainsActivity' TypeConstraint='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity']$">
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/RunbookId$">ca88b13b-861a-4d39-a3cb-fd912d951e35</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/TemplateId$">Template.b311e1f9126e4e19bbbbeb65ddb220ba</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/IsReadyForAutomation$">True</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomMicrosoft_SystemCenter_Orchestrator!Microsoft.SystemCenter.Orchestrator.RunbookAutomationActivity.Base']/PropertyMapping$"><?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?>
<ParameterMapping xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<ParameterList>
<RunbookParameterItem>
<Name>RA Activity GUID</Name>
<Id>5677d117a0294a2c898a695032f26c72</Id>
<Type>String</Type>
<Value>Generic::Id</Value>
<Direction>In</Direction>
<ContextInfo />
</RunbookParameterItem>
</ParameterList>
<RunbookId>ca88b13b-861a-4d39-a3cb-fd912d951e35</RunbookId>
</ParameterMapping></Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItem.Activity']/ChildId$">1120</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItem.Activity']/Status$">$MPElement[Name='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!ActivityStatusEnum.Active']$</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='CustomSystem_WorkItem_Activity_Library!System.WorkItem.Activity']/Skip$">False</Property>
<Property Path="$Context/Property[Type='WorkItem!System.WorkItem']/Title$">Execute Orchestrator IR - Autoassign</Property>
</Object>
</ObjectTemplate>

Novated Purchase orders cannot be changed error

Hi Experts,
while trying to edit the PO we are getting an error as " Novated Purchase orders cannot be changed" . I am confused that which field is used to differentiate the normal PO to that of novated PO at portal level. Please let us know why this error occurs and how can we solve the issue ?
Thanks in Advance.
Thanks & Regards,
Aishwarya.M

Hello Aishwarya ,
A Novation is agreement of parties usually done in conjunction with an assignment where upon the assignment there is now a new agreement between the original party whose contract was assigned and the party to whom the contract was assigned that in effect extinguishes (cancels) the old agreement and relieves the assigning party of liability under the contract.
For example if A and B have a contract and there is an assignment and novation of that contract by B to C, the contract would now be between A and C and B would no longer be liable to A under the contract as the “novation” extinguishes their liability.
If you wanted to prevent a novation you might include something like the following:
“This contract shall be binding on the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns. Except in the instance of an assignment or transfer by Buyer of all or any portion of this agreement, the assigning party shall remain liable for the performance of any assigned or transferred obligations hereunder.
The requirements for a novation may vary by jurisdiction. For example in New York for there to be a novation it must specifically say it is a novation. In assignment consent letters Suppliers may try to create a novation by the words they use where the language in affect would say that Buyer may only look to the new entity going forward. Please check with the PO which supplier is being used and also check is there any third party involvement in that PO.
Thanks
Gaurav Gautam

Cannot assign changes to groups, only to single images

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for