Canon S90 raw - lens profile overcorrect distortion

I was able to successfuly create profiles for all my Nikon gear, but Canon S90 is a completely different story. I tried all possible variations, focus distance, diferent charts, sizes, changing advanced settings and so on, but the result is always way overcorrected geometric distortion. It actually makes it worse then original. If I reduce correction to about 22% then it looks right. The same applies to available S90 profile on-line. Chromatic and vignetting models appear to be correct.
Original image:
Corrected image in Camera Raw:
I can send you zip file with original raw if you like to test it in the lab.

The S90 images are already auto-corrected for distortion based on metadata. Hence the raw images processed by CR/LR will have a similar shape to the JPEGs produced by the camera (e.g., if you shoot raw + JPEG).
At present we do not support user-created lens profiles for the S90 for raw files. This is a known limitation of CR/LR that will be corrected.
The same limitation applies to CR/LR with regards to Micro 4/3 cameras and the Panasonic LX3 / Leica DLUX4.

Similar Messages

  • Can I obtain a Camera Raw lens profile for my Fujifilm X100S?

    Can I obtain a Camera Raw lens profile for my Fujifilm X100S?

    The Fuji X100S uses built-in lens profile supplied in the raw files, themselves, so Adobe applies the profile automatically and it cannot be turned off.
    There is no indication of the profile being applied in Lightroom but the recent versions of the Camera Raw plug-in for Photoshop will indicate that a built-in profile is being used:

  • GoPro Camera Raw Lens Profile settings not working for image sequence in Photoshop/AE/Premiere CS6

    Hey Everyone,
    I'm in need of assistance in either Photoshop CS6, After Effects CS6, or Premiere Pro CS6.  I just installed the trials after seeing Russell Brown demo the GoPro Lens Profile correction feature in Camera Raw.  Basically what I'm looking to do is make adjustments (in Adobe Camera Raw) to a series of still images (shot with the time-lapse mode on the GoPro) and then either export those stills through Photoshop or Bridge to a temporary movie file that will be imported into a timeline (with other video clips), or import the JPG files (with Camera Raw settings) directly into After Effects or Premiere as an image sequence.  The latter would be preferable as it'd avoid the extra step of having to render the intermediate/temporary movie file.
    Right now, my current workflow for GoPro time-lapses is:
              - use Bridge CS4 to do basic color correction on the still images
              - save those as TIF files
              - run the TIF files through a custom script to have Hugin 2012.0.0 (open source pano stitcher) remove the fisheye distortion
              - open the new TIF image sequence into QuickTime Player 7 (Pro)
              - export the image sequence as a QuickTime movie file
              - import the movie file into Premiere Elements 10 to place on a timeline with other video clips (as Premiere Elements can't handle the sequence(s) of thousands of still images without crashing)
    If I can go directly from Bridge to a timeline, it'd save a lot of processing time (and it'd be much nicer to preview the images in Bridge without the fisheye distortion)!
    I can prepare the GoPro JPG files through Adobe Camera Raw in Bridge CS6, though when I go to import the JPEG image sequence into Premiere Pro CS6 or After Effects CS6, none of the Camera Raw settings are applied.  If I export the Camera Raw files in Bridge CS6 as DNG files (a step I'd really prefer to avoid) and then import the DNG image sequence into After Effects CS6, the Camera Raw settings are applied except for the Lens Profile settings -- I can pick other cameras but not the GoPro lens profiles when the DNG image sequence loads in After Effects.  It also appears that once I open the DNG files in After Effects CS6, I can no longer access the GoPro Lens Profile in Adobe Bridge CS6 -- the list changes to the same list I get in After Effects.  Premiere Pro CS6 doesn't let me import the DNG files at all.  I've also tried to import the JPG files (as well as the converted DNG files) into an image sequence in Photoshop CS6, though it doesn't allow me to do so (the Image Sequence checkbox is grayed out after I apply the Camera Raw settings in Bridge).
    There could be an issue going on with different Camera Raw versions.  I didn't have Premiere Pro CS6 installed during my initial testing, though now do notice that the Camera Raw dialog in Bridge CS6 only lets me choose compatibility up to "Camera Raw 7.1 and later" when I choose to export the files as DNG.  I thought Camera Raw 8.2 was an option there a couple days ago when I only had installed Photoshop CS6 and After Effects CS6 (though am not 100% certain).
    Please let me know if there is some workaround to get the GoPro lens profile Camera Raw corrections applied in an image sequence in one of the Adobe CS6 products (without having to export the files as temporary TIF or JPG files out of Camera Raw).  I'd greatly prefer to shorten my current workflow for these files.  (I just updated the CS6 trials and have tested all three programs again though I still get the same results described above.)
    Does Lightroom 5 have any option to export Camera Raw image sequences as movie files (or any other feature that might help in simplifying my current workflow)?  I can't install the trial right now as it's not compatible with OS X 10.6.8.  I'd consider upgrading OS X if I knew Lightroom 5 would do what I need, though am waiting for any potential color profile issues to be resolved in OS X 10.9.
    I can open the image sequence in Photoshop CS6 if no Camera Raw settings are applied and then use the Lens Correction Filter to apply the GoPro Lens Profile settings, though I really prefer the Camera Raw interface in Bridge for tweaking image settings.  As soon as I apply Camera Raw settings to the first image, Photoshop CS6 grays out the image sequence checkbox.
    If there isn't a way to take Camera Raw files straight from Adobe Bridge to a timeline, I may stick with my current workflow using CS4 and see what I can do to better automate some of the steps as the TIF export in Bridge, fisheye distortion removal in Hugin, and render in QuickTime Player all take quite a while.  I won't mind waiting for all the processing if I can set it and check back on it in later the next day when it's fully complete.  Is there a way to have Adobe ExtendScript execute an external shell command (i.e.: a command I could type into the bash shell in Terminal in OS X)?  If not, is there a way to call/run an ExtendScript script from the command line and pass a parameter to it that my custom script could use?
    Thanks in advance,
    Mark

    Can you zip up a few of your GoPro images, upload them to dropbox.com and post a share link, here, so others can experiment with them, or do you mean this issue is global to all camera models?

  • Why are no Pentax lenses in the Adobe Camera Raw lens profiles when processing JPG files?

    I normally shoot and process raw files and use the latest version of Adobe Camera Raw for processing. Some of these files are converted to jpg for use on the net or e-mailing etc. Sometimes I want to make minor changes to the now converted jpg file and often go to Adobe Camera Raw for ease and speed of use. Lately I have gone back to some files that were not thoroughly processed as raw files before conversion to jpg. When, in ACR, I go to Lens Corrections panel, Profile tab, I Enable Lens Profile Corrections and choose Setup: Auto (or Default) and get the message, "Unable to locate a matching lens profile automatically".
    I then go down to Lens Profile and click on Make with the intention of choosing the Pentax lens which I used for the photo. Here is the problem - there are only six choices under make, namely Apple, Canon, Nikon, Sigma, Sony and Tamron. I have no such issues when processing a raw file in Adobe Camera Raw. Pentax lenses are automatically detected and Pentax, along with Leica, Samsung, Zeiss, etc. are choices under Make of lens.
    Do other people have this problem? Is there some setting I have missed? Is Adobe just not permitting some makers' lenses, for which there are profiles, to be corrected if the files are jpgs?
    BTW, I have checked and the same issues exist for tiff files opened in ACR.

    Assuming I read your post correctly, and that you're trying to use Lens corrections on JPEGs and TIFFs...  I believe there's a completely different set of profiles for correcting already "developed" images (such as JPEGs and TIFFs).  If I recall correctly (and it's been a while since I read about this), it's the same set that's used inside Photoshop for the Filter - Lens Correction tool (I hope someone here will correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm sure I read this somewhere).
    If your lenses are known to Camera Raw when you develop raw files, I suggest you will need to go all the way back to your Raw file and reprocess it from that stage.  You'll get a better result anyway.
    -Noel

  • DNG Converter 5.6 and Canon S90 RAW Images

    This has been an ongoing query with the Adobe Customer Support Centre since November 12 last year. Refer case no #0181279281. Although the documentation that accompanies DNG 5.6 states that the Canon S90 is a supported camera, the converted images come out far too saturated and are not usable. Has anyone been able to rectify this problem? I use Photoshop CS3.

    Rob_Minter wrote:
    …if I upgrade to ACR 5.6, will the image look the same (on my monitor) as when it is opened in ACR 4.6?
    Rob,
    Well, for starters, you cannot open the CR2 in ACR 4.6 directly.  You know that, of course, otherwise you wouldn't have to mess with the DNG Converter in the first place.  
    If you use ACR 5.6 and if you have correctly installed the additional camera profiles that will get added to ACR 5.6 once you correctly install the DNG Converter 5.6, you will have a variety of choices to open your CR2 file or a DNG derived from that file.  Even the "Adobe Standard" profile for your particular will most likely improve the rendition, but you can choose the "Camera Faithful" or any of the other five profiles specifically provided for your camera model.
    Note that the screen shot is a medium-resolution JPEG only.
    This ACR rendition was generated in ACR 5.6 with the "Adobe Standard" profile
    and an Exposure correction of +1.45.
    Also note that only the profiles for the specific camera that generated the raw file will show in the profile menu of the Camera Calibration tab at any given time.  Other cameras will cause that profile menu to show different profiles.  In actuality, the installation of the DNG Converter adds a gazillion profiles for all supported cameras, so it's a good thing that only the camera-model-specific ones show. 
    This ACR rendition was generated in ACR 5.6 with the "Camera Faithful" profile
    and an Exposure correction of +1.45.
    The rendition of the image will be different with each of the profiles (as you can see above), but even so, I doubt any of those profiles will match the rendition of the totally obsolete ACR 4.6.  The ACR 5.6 rendition is bound to be better.
    Each new version of ACR includes improvements, enhancement and bug fixes that are not publicized or even admitted. 
    If you have mastered the use of ACR, you can match the rendition of just about any raw converter and any other profile, especially if you calibrate your camera, which is extremely easy to do in ACR 5.6.  You can save as many presets as you want.
    That's why I strongly recommend Jeff Schewe's book.  As far as I'm concerned, it's required reading.
    Finally, there are many other reasons to upgrade to ACR 5.6, like the spot Adjustment Brush and the Targeted Adjustment Tool (TAT).
    Don't take my word for it, download the CS4 trial version and update that to ACR 5.6 (it comes with 5.0, also very obsolete).  You can keep different versions of Photoshop on your disk.  On the Mac, you can even run different versions simultaneously by launching the older version(s) first.
    Uninstalling CS4, though, may mangle your CS3 install, so keep that in mind.  My feeling is, though, that once you use CS4, you won't ant to look back at CS3.  DISCLAIMER:  I have no connection to Adobe whatsoever.
    I cannot speak to Lightroom because I do not use it, for a number of reasons that are not relevant to your issue.
    Respectfully,
    Wo-Tai-Lao Wo-Tai-P'ang. 

  • Camera Raw - Lens Profile Correction

    I'm just beginning to work with Photoshop CS5.  When I was editing with the camera raw features; I discovered that there had not been a "Lens Profile Correction" loaded for my Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10 with a Leica lens 14-150.  I"m looking for a method to get this lens added to the Profile Connection.

    Maybe you should also check over at
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/cameraraw
    You could also check out Adobe Lens Profile Creator if the lense has not profiled yet.
    http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lensprofile_creator/

  • Canon S90 Raw

    Doesn anyone know when Aperture 2 will handle S90 Raw files?

    I think this was a surprise to everyone. I can't believe Apple would just choose to skip that camera -- it got very good reviews and is considered a favorite in the advanced point & shoot category.
    Adobe did have problems with their own RAW drivers for the S90. While the beta-versions of Adobe's Camera RAW were available, it was the one camera where lots of users on the Adobe forums were complaining that the images were having problems.
    My "guess" (and this is my own personal speculation) is that there was something strange about that camera that gave both Adobe (who obviously did have problems with it -- we know that) and Apple (who is very secretive about what they're working on.) Apple might have opted to just ship the Camera RAW update with only the cameras that they were able to get working properly and push the S90 to a later update -- rather than making everyone who bought one of the new cameras on the support list wait until the S90 support was ready.
    I only wish Apple would tell users what their intentions are... do they at least plan to support it but need more time?
    I totally understand why Apple's secrecy works to their advantage when it comes to NEW products being announced (phones, Macs, etc.) Apple doesn't even have to promote stuff because the press goes wild with speculation until everyone just has to tune in to find out what Apple really is announcing. The strategy is brilliant. But that same secrecy works against them when it comes to customer support intentions for existing products.
    Message was edited by: Tim Campbell1

  • Canon FD 50mm 1.8 Lens Profile for Canon 60D

    I've created a lens profile today for the Canon FD 50mm 1.8 on a Canon 60D using the Fotodiox adapter.  I sent it to Adobe for posting publicly.   If anyone would like to download it in the meantime you can find it here:
    Please click this link
    I might have messed it up.  It's my first time creating a profile and seemed to work fine for me in Lightroom.  Let me know if there are any improvements to be made. I used f5.6 since that seemed to be the sweet spot on the lens and the imager was about 5 feet from the chart.

    JPG lens profiles are distinct from RAW lens profiles because cameras can fix things with the camera-produced JPGs that the lens profiles also fix and you can get double-corrections by using a raw lens profile with a jpg, but it depends on the capabilities and settings of the particular camera.
    If you are sure your camera isn’t correcting geometric and vignetting issues with your JPGs, then you can hack the lens profile you downloaded to use it with JPGs, by editing the .lcp file with a text editor and change the flag indicating it is for raw files from True to False.  I forget what this flag is called, exactly, but it is obvious and near the top of the files.
    On Windows, the lens profiles are downloaded to:
    C:\Users\--username--\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\
    AppData is a hidden or system folder so you’ll need to unhide such folders in the folder options in Explorer or just type in the path an hit Enter in the address area of Explorer.

  • Lens profile for Canon 28/1.8 - already installed in LR4?

    Hmm, the explanation of lens profiles and how to add them is a little confusing.
    When I look here in Adobe's own list of supported lenses, my new "Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 IS USM" is listed there:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/multi/lens-profile-support-lightroom-4.html
    Does that mean that profile should already be installed in LR 4? (I am running 4.4)
    The profile is not showing up in Lightroom for me. (I am shooting JPEG.)
    I downloaded the lens profile downloader, and found a profile for this lens, but is that the official Adobe profile for the lens? I installed it but it still doesn't work for me because it is for RAW only.
    Sorry for the newbie question.
    thanks in advance,
    Paul D.

    JPG lens profiles are distinct from RAW lens profiles because cameras can fix things with the camera-produced JPGs that the lens profiles also fix and you can get double-corrections by using a raw lens profile with a jpg, but it depends on the capabilities and settings of the particular camera.
    If you are sure your camera isn’t correcting geometric and vignetting issues with your JPGs, then you can hack the lens profile you downloaded to use it with JPGs, by editing the .lcp file with a text editor and change the flag indicating it is for raw files from True to False.  I forget what this flag is called, exactly, but it is obvious and near the top of the files.
    On Windows, the lens profiles are downloaded to:
    C:\Users\--username--\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\
    AppData is a hidden or system folder so you’ll need to unhide such folders in the folder options in Explorer or just type in the path an hit Enter in the address area of Explorer.

  • Need additional Lens Profiles in Camera RAW

    Hello, I have Photoshop CC (always kept up to date), and I would like to add some lens profiles to the camera RAW section. When I select Camera RAW, Lens correction, then Canon, I can not see the lens I actually want, EF16-35 II for the 5DII. This is a very common lens and I have no idea why it is missing.
    Do I need to update this somehow manually?
    (I can see this lens in Photoshop CC, and the Lens filter, but I want/need it in Camera RAW)

    So you use Photomatix to create a 32-bit HDR file and then tone that 32-bit file in ACR?  Are the Photomatix 32-bit files that much different than the PS-CC 32-bit files?  The Photomatix 32-to-16-bit conversion is quite a bit different and perhaps preferable, but I didn’t realize the 32-bit result file is also that much different.  It’s been a while since I’ve tried 32-bit HDRs and even longer since I’ve tried them in Photomatix so things may have changed or I’ve forgotten.
    If you are using Photomatix, then you are not using an Adobe raw conversion at all, so Adobe settings and raw lens profiles are not seen and used at the initial raw-conversion stage in Photomatix.
    The choices would seem to be that you can use Adobe products to create 16-bit TIFs as an input to Photomatix, or hack an Adobe raw lens profile to be used with non-raw files in ACR, or do your lens profile corrections after you’ve saved your 32-bit HDR image back as a 16-bit one and use the lens corrections area in Photoshop if that is still possible, nowadays.

  • CR 6.1 - Unable to locate lens profile automatically

    Raw files from Canon camera are correctly identified and lens distortion is corrected automatically, but on jpgs from same camera I get this error: "unable to locate lens profile automatically".Can't even do it manually as lens profile that is available for raw file is missing from drop down menu on jpgs. Also weird because it does show some lens profiles in drop downs, just not the right one. But, again, right one is there for raw files. Weird!

    That is because lens profiles for raw and non-raw are necessarily different and separate (like color profiles). We have more raw lens files available than non-raw lens profiles (e.g., Canon 70-200 lenses). As a general rule, I would encourage you to be applying lens corrections via profiles at the raw stage in CR, rather than to JPEGs/TIFFs (given a choice between the two), because of various technical advantages in the former case.
    Eric

  • Lens Profile Support LR5

    Lens profiles not showing up in LR 5.
    Working on a Mac 10.7.5, Photoshop CS6, and Camera Raw 8.3 installed. In Lightroom 4, my Canon 6D camera was supported, all lens profiles appearing in LR, was able to choose my Tamron 28-200 mm profile for raw images. Have installed LR 5 and no profiles are coming up. The profiles all appear in: Mac/Library/Application Support/Adobe/Camera Raw/Lens Profiles, on my system, but I cannot seem to get them to appear in LR 5 so I can choose my lens for "Enable Lens Correction" option.
    Have opened a raw file in PH 6, Lens correction, my correct lens is appearing, but says it cannot be found online.
    Any ideas or suggestions, thanks

    Do you have the latest camera raw installed for Photoshop? If so, you can find the profiles in /Library/Application\ Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/LensProfiles/1.0/Nikon/ . Lightroom should recognize them if you move them into your home directory's Library folder in the exact same folder structure (but in the Library folder in your home directory). This is assuming you are using Mac OS X. No clue where these files would be on Windows. If you don't have Photoshop, you can install Camera Raw using the combined installer with DNG converter which is a free download from Adobe. This should (I think) give you the profiles in that exact location without owning Photoshop.

  • How do I create a new lens profile?

    How do I creat a new lens profile for a Canon EF135mm f/2 and EF200 f/2.8 in lightroom 3.3?

    Hi Simon,
    Thanks for your reply.   I figured it out, I  downloaded the new version of Raw 6.3 and now I have the lens profile and others  such as crop constraint and
    chromatic abrerrations.  I was looking for these items in Photoshop Raw
    Thanks,
    Aideen
    If I understand you correctly, you found and downloaded a lens profile that matches your camera and lens, and you don't see the profile in LR?
    1. Make sure that you relaunch LR after you downloaded the lens profiles.
    2. The type of lens profiles (raw or non-raw) matches your image type (raw or non-raw). Namely you can only apply raw lens profiles to raw image files and vice versa for the non-raw profiles.
    -Simon
    >

  • Adobe Lens Profile Creator Crashes with DNG files

    Hi, I'm using Win 7 with the latest version of the Adobe Lens Profile Creator, v 1.0.4. I have no issues generating profiles from jpeg or tiff files, but every time I try to add a DNG file, I get a "Adobe Lens Profile Creator has stopped working..." error message. The DNG files were created from a Canon 5D Mk II .CR2, using the latest DNR converter 7.3.
    The crash information from Windows Reliability Monitor goes:
    Description
    Faulting Application Path:          F:\Adobe Lens Profile Creator\Adobe Lens Profile Creator 1.0.4\Adobe Lens Profile Creator.exe
    Problem signature
    Problem Event Name:          APPCRASH
    Application Name:          Adobe Lens Profile Creator.exe
    Application Version:          1.0.0.0
    Application Timestamp:          500d1325
    Fault Module Name:          Adobe Lens Profile Creator.exe
    Fault Module Version:          1.0.0.0
    Fault Module Timestamp:          500d1325
    Exception Code:          c0000005
    Exception Offset:          0007ce0c
    OS Version:          6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.48
    Locale ID:          1033
    Additional Information 1:          0a9e
    Additional Information 2:          0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
    Additional Information 3:          0a9e
    Additional Information 4:          0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
    Files that help describe the problem
    AppCompat.txt
    WERInternalMetadata.xml
    memory.hdmp
    minidump.mdmp
    Really appreciate any help to solve this issue, so I can continue to create raw lens profiles. Thanks!

    German Jack ha scritto:
    create an jpg/tif – profile
    create a copy from the lcp
    rename this copy with “ – RAW”
    open this lcp with an editor
    search any “False” and rename it to “True”
    save it and you have a perfect raw - lensprofile
    Ok, but what does it mean rename and correct the content of the lcp file?
    It remains a profile created from jpg source, CameraRaw could consider it like a raw lens profile but it has no more value than a jpg profile, I believe...
    Anyway, for whatelse it could be useful your suggestion to modify lcp file?
    Thank you for your attention

  • Should I bother with the Adobe Lens Profile Creator?

    I am concentrating mostly on architectural photography these days and I need a pep talk about the "Adobe Lens Profile Creator". The process seems laborious and error prone -  in other words it could end up being a waste of time and money (for the printing of the calibration charts). Has anyone used it to good effect? And with what lenses?
    I do the bulk of my work with the 24mm PC-E Nikkor f/3.5 lens and I also use two older lenses  - the 28mm PC Nikkor f/3.5 and (my favorite) the 15mm Nikkor f/3.5. All three lenses suffer from a small amount of barrel distortion and chromatic aberration so some correction is usually needed.
    I have two specific reservations about the lens profiling process -
    1. It came out with Photoshop CS5. Since then the manual controls have increased in sophistication. Can't I get pretty much the same result using the manual adjustments?
    2. In my drop-down menu in Adobe Camera Raw CC there are eighty-one lenses listed - but not the three I am using! This is crazy and reflects badly on the people who designed the whole process. Who cares about perspective correction in a 600mm lens?
    Anyway, I would appreciate a reply from anyone who has gone through the profiling process. Thanks.
    Kevin from Cambridge, Massachusetts

    German Jack ha scritto:
    create an jpg/tif – profile
    create a copy from the lcp
    rename this copy with “ – RAW”
    open this lcp with an editor
    search any “False” and rename it to “True”
    save it and you have a perfect raw - lensprofile
    Ok, but what does it mean rename and correct the content of the lcp file?
    It remains a profile created from jpg source, CameraRaw could consider it like a raw lens profile but it has no more value than a jpg profile, I believe...
    Anyway, for whatelse it could be useful your suggestion to modify lcp file?
    Thank you for your attention

Maybe you are looking for