Capturing a nested "Section" hierarchy with a Conversion Table?

(Frame 9) - I'm using a Conversion Table to convert a client's unstructured documents to structured. Much of the structure is importing with a certain amount of success, but I can't figure out how to capture the nested hierarchy. The client's template uses the same "Section" element with a "Title" child element for each level of the document.
I can capture the document headings from the H1, H2, H3 paragraph tags form the old document and wrap them in "Title" elements with H1, H2, H3 qualifiers but I can't figure out how to then wrap the Title elements in the corresponding Section elements that reflect the hierarchy levels. Frame must have an internal qualifier for the Section elements but I can't figure out how to look it up?
Thanks, Chris

Chris,
It should work fine if you have the qualifiers properly specified in the rules for wrapping the sections. Here is a link to a working sample that shows how it is done, which coincidentally also uses Section elements (but Heading elements in place of Title elements):
http://www.weststreetconsulting.com/WSC_ResourceDownloads.htm
Get the FrameSLT sample.
Russ

Similar Messages

Hierarchy with multiple Physical tables

Some time ago there was a post with this subject and I am in need, if you pls, with the same situation:
I am looking for Dim (1) - (1:N)-> Dim (3). And Dim (3) - (1:N)-> Fact.
Suggestion by Mr. Bharath was to, just reduce your snowflake to star in your BMM with Dim (3) as your single LTS. Within the LTS map Dim (1). to Dim (3).
Could someone pls. help me clarifying the suggestion .../
a) Should I use the Dim(3) LTS and how to map Dim(1) ? - I believe we should use a column ? right ? Or just Add the Dim(3) in the LTS tables
Txs. for any hints
Antonio

Hi Antonio,
First of all - try to avoid SNF in BMM.
http://www.oraclebidwh.com/2010/10/obiee-bmm-layer-design-principalsbest-practices/
Comments:
1) You can keep the SNF model in BMM, but if you keep them, then you cannot create an hiearchy with combination of Dim(1) and Dim(3) together as those are two seperate LT.
2) OBIEE will take the shortest path in forming the query. But, if there are multiple shortest path, then OBIEE will use the latest relationship ID in creating the execution plan. For example: Dim (1) is joined with Dim(3) and Dim(4) and your report pulls - Dim(1) and Fact(1), then the shortest path can be either through DIM(3) or Dim(4), and for such scenario's OBIEE will use the ID (latest ID). Say Dim(4) was the latest join - then OBIEE will use Dim(4) in the query to join with Dim(1).
3) I actually do not undertstand your issue here - if you are creating an Hiearchy using Dim(1) and Dim(3) together, then why don;t you pull all the fields from Dim(1) into this LT. And in your presentation create folders if you want both the dimensions to be displayed seperately.
If you are trying to understand and explore OBIEE - then go ahead play with all possible ways you could think off.
Regards,
Bharath

Conversion Table Questions: problems converting tables to structured

I'm in the process of converting unstructed FM8 docs to structured docs using FM10 and DITA structure. Right now I'm trying to build a conversion table to structure the docs, but I'm having a lot of trouble with the tables. The main problem seems to be with the tgroup element since I can't figure out how to get the thead and tbody to wrap in the tgroup element.
Here is an example of one of the tables I'm trying to structure:
This is the Table section of the conversion table I've had the most success with:
And this is the result:
As you can see, the thead and tbody elements are not wrapped in tgroup and the structure is invalid. I've been playing around with the conversion table for several days now and can't seem to figure out how to fix this. If anyone has any suggestions, they would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
D'Arcy

D'Arcy,
Here are a few observations that might help:
1) The structure you use within FM (which is what the conversion table helps create) need not be exactly the same as the structure you use in XML.
2) Do not confuse the element named table with a FrameMaker table.
3) As Michael has pointed out, the CALS table model used by DITA is a five-level structure:
table
tgroup
 tbody
 row
 entry
while the FrameMaker table model has 4 levels:
table
tbody
 row
 cell
4) FrameMaker can map between the 5-level structure and the 4-level structure in one of two ways, controlled by the element definitions (usually specified in an EDD), the read/write rules, and the DTD:
a) The element named table can be a container while the element named tgroup is the actual table. This model has a closer correspondence between the FrameMaker and the DITA table structure. Michael has pointed out one of its biggest weaknesses. If a FrameMaker table (regardless of its element name) has a title, then FrameMaker repeats the title on each page of a multipage table. However, if the element named table is a container and the actual table is an element named tgroup, the title is a container preceding the table and this automatic repetition does not happen.
b) If you are sure that your tables will always consist of a single tgroup, you don't have to use the tgroup element within FrameMaker. Make the element named table a FrameMaker table and include the read/write rule:
element "tgroup" unwrap;
FrameMaker will recreate the tgroup element whenever you save a document as XML. This model allows you to make the table title a FrameMaker table. However, you cannot use the element named title as both a FrameMaker table title and a container. Typically, therefore, people use the element named title as a container that is the title of things like chapters and sections and use an element named something like tabletitle for the title of tables.
Read/write rules like:
element "title" is fm element:
element "title" is fm table title element "tabletitle"'
let you save your documents as XML with both title and tabletitle represented as <title> in XML. You'll need to use a custom client or XSLT to map the XML element named title to either title or tabletitle depending on whether the XML element occurs within a table or not.
5) Your conversion table had one row with T: in column 1 and another with T:Format A in column 1; one mapped to table and the other to tgroup. The row with T:Format A would apply to all tables with the specified format, the other row would apply to all tables with other formats. These conversion table rows do not define a relationship between table and tgroup. Map T: to table if you want the model in 4b) above and to tgroup if you want the model in 4a). In the latter case, use an additional row with:
title?, tgroup
in column 1 and table in column 2.
 --Lynne

How to create a hierarchy with postable notes

Hi all,
Please take e look at the following case:
In BPS we want to make a planning on groups of FI-GL-accounts. For the grouping of the GL-account we make use of the Financial Statement functionality in R/3. With a BC DataSource (0GL_ACCOUNT_T011_HIER) this Financial Statement is imported in BW as a hierarchy on InfoObject 0GL_ACCOUNT. As said, we do not want to make a planning on the GL-account but on the groups, i.e. the nodes of the hierarchy. We think in this case we need a BW hierarchy with postable nodes and make the planning on the inner nodes of the hierarchy.
So far so good, but when we execute the Manual planning the system responds with Hierarchy xxxx does not contain any postable nodes Anyone has a clue? Did we forget something?
Thx,
Henk van der Haar.

Hi Henk,
For the hierarchy with postable nodes the nodes also have to be captured as characteristic values firstly. For more details refer to the document link below
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/g-i/how to plan in bps using hierarchies with several characteristics.pdf
Some useful threads also on the same.
Hierarchy with Postable nodes
Bbw hierarchy with postable nodes Disabled
Hope it helps.
Cheers
Anurag

Query rewrites with Nested materialized views with different aggregations

Platform used : Oracle 11g.
Here is a simple fact table (with measures m1,m2) and dimensions (a) Location (b) Calendar and (c) Product. The business problem is that aggregation operator for measure m1,m2 are different along location dimension and Calendar dimension. The intention is to preaggregate the measures for a product along the calendar dimension and Location dimension and store it as materialized views.
The direct option is to define a materialized view with Inline queries (Because of the different aggrergation operator, it is not possible to write a query without Inline query). http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28313/qradv.htm#BABEAJBF documents the limitations that it works only for 'Text match' and 'Equivalent queries' and that is too limiting.
So decided to have nested materialized view, with first view having just joins(my_dim_mvw_joins), the second view having aggregations along Calendar dimension (my_dim_mvw_calendar) and third view having aggregations along the Location dimension(my_dim_mvw_location). Obviously I do not want the query I fire to know about materialized views and I fire it against the fact table. I see that for the fired query (Which needs aggregations along both Calendar and Location), is rewritten with just second materialized view but not the third. (Had set QUERY_REWRITE_INTEGRITY as TRUSTED) .
Wanted to know whether there are limitations on Query Writes with nested materialized views? Thanks
(Have given a simple testable example below. Pls ignore the values given in 'CALENDAR_IDs', 'PRODUCT_IDs' etc as they are the same for all the queries)
-- Calendar hierarchy table
CREATE TABLE CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE
(     "CALENDAR_ID" NUMBER(5,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"HIERARCHY1_ID" NUMBER(5,0),
"HIERARCHY2_ID" NUMBER(5,0),
"HIERARCHY3_ID" NUMBER(5,0),
"HIERARCHY4_ID" NUMBER(5,0),
CONSTRAINT "CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("CALENDAR_ID")
-- Location hierarchy table
CREATE TABLE LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE
(     "LOCATION_ID" NUMBER(3,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
"HIERARCHY1_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
"HIERARCHY2_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
"HIERARCHY3_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
"HIERARCHY4_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
CONSTRAINT "LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("LOCATION_ID")
-- Product hierarchy table
CREATE TABLE PRODUCT_HIERARCHY_TREE
(     "PRODUCT_ID" NUMBER(3,0) NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "HIERARCHY1_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
     "HIERARCHY2_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
     "HIERARCHY3_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
     "HIERARCHY4_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
     "HIERARCHY5_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
     "HIERARCHY6_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
     CONSTRAINT "PRODUCT_HIERARCHY_TREE_PK" PRIMARY KEY ("PRODUCT_ID")
-- Fact table
CREATE TABLE RETAILER_SALES_TBL
(     "PRODUCT_ID" NUMBER,
"PRODUCT_KEY" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
"PLAN_ID" NUMBER,
"PLAN_PERIOD_ID" NUMBER,
"PERIOD_ID" NUMBER(5,0),
"M1" NUMBER,
"M2" NUMBER,
"M3" NUMBER,
"M4" NUMBER,
"M5" NUMBER,
"M6" NUMBER,
"M7" NUMBER,
"M8" NUMBER,
"LOCATION_ID" NUMBER(3,0),
"M9" NUMBER,
CONSTRAINT "RETAILER_SALES_TBL_LOCATI_FK1" FOREIGN KEY ("LOCATION_ID")
REFERENCES LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE ("LOCATION_ID") ENABLE,
CONSTRAINT "RETAILER_SALES_TBL_PRODUC_FK1" FOREIGN KEY ("PRODUCT_ID")
REFERENCES PRODUCT_HIERARCHY_TREE ("PRODUCT_ID") ENABLE,
CONSTRAINT "RETAILER_SALES_TBL_CALEND_FK1" FOREIGN KEY ("PERIOD_ID")
REFERENCES CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE ("CALENDAR_ID") ENABLE
-- Location dimension definition to promote query rewrite
create DIMENSION LOCATION_DIM
LEVEL CHAIN IS LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE.HIERARCHY1_ID
LEVEL CONSUMER_SEGMENT IS LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE.HIERARCHY3_ID
LEVEL STORE IS LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE.LOCATION_ID
LEVEL TRADING_AREA IS LOCATION_HIERARCHY_TREE.HIERARCHY2_ID
HIERARCHY PROD_ROLLUP (
STORE CHILD OF
CONSUMER_SEGMENT CHILD OF
TRADING_AREA CHILD OF
CHAIN
-- Calendar dimension definition
create DIMENSION CALENDAR_DIM
LEVEL MONTH IS CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE.HIERARCHY3_ID
LEVEL QUARTER IS CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE.HIERARCHY2_ID
LEVEL WEEK IS CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE.CALENDAR_ID
LEVEL YEAR IS CALENDAR_HIERARCHY_TREE.HIERARCHY1_ID
HIERARCHY CALENDAR_ROLLUP (
WEEK CHILD OF
MONTH CHILD OF
QUARTER CHILD OF
YEAR
-- Materialized view with just joins needed for other views
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW my_dim_mvw_joins build immediate refresh complete enable query rewrite as
select product_id, lht.HIERARCHY1_ID, lht.HIERARCHY2_ID, lht.HIERARCHY3_ID, lht.location_id, cht.HIERARCHY1_ID year,
cht.HIERARCHY2_ID quarter, cht.HIERARCHY3_ID month, cht.calendar_id week, m1, m3, m7, m9
from retailer_sales_tbl RS, calendar_hierarchy_tree cht, location_hierarchy_tree lht
WHERE RS.period_id = cht.CALENDAR_ID
and RS.location_id = lht.location_id
and cht.CALENDAR_ID in (10,236,237,238,239,608,609,610,611,612,613,614,615,616,617,618,619,1426,1427,1428,1429,1430,1431,1432,1433,1434,1435,1436,1437,1438,1439,1440,1441,1442,1443,1444,1445,1446,1447,1448,1449,1450,1451,1452,1453,1454,1455,1456,1457,1458,1459,1460,1461,1462,1463,1464,1465,1466,1467,1468,1469,1470,1471,1472,1473,1474,1475,1476,1477)
AND product_id IN (5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20)
AND lht.location_id IN (2, 3, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 4, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20)
-- Materialized view which aggregate along calendar dimension
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW my_dim_mvw_calendar build immediate refresh complete enable query rewrite as
select product_id, HIERARCHY1_ID , HIERARCHY2_ID , HIERARCHY3_ID ,location_id, year, quarter, month, week,
sum(m1) m1_total, sum(m3) m3_total, sum(m7) m7_total, sum(m9) m9_total,
GROUPING_ID(product_id, location_id, year, quarter, month, week) dim_mvw_gid
from my_dim_mvw_joins
GROUP BY product_id, HIERARCHY1_ID , HIERARCHY2_ID , HIERARCHY3_ID , location_id,
rollup (year, quarter, month, week);
-- Materialized view which aggregate along Location dimension
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW my_dim_mvw_location build immediate refresh complete enable query rewrite as
select product_id, year, quarter, month, week, HIERARCHY1_ID, HIERARCHY2_ID, HIERARCHY3_ID, location_id,
sum(m1_total) m1_total_1, sum(m3_total) m3_total_1, sum(m7_total) m7_total_1, sum(m9_total) m9_total_1,
GROUPING_ID(product_id, HIERARCHY1_ID, HIERARCHY2_ID, HIERARCHY3_ID, location_id, year, quarter, month, week) dim_mvw_gid
from my_dim_mvw_calendar
GROUP BY product_id, year, quarter, month, week,
rollup (HIERARCHY1_ID, HIERARCHY2_ID, HIERARCHY3_ID, location_id)
-- SQL Query Fired (for simplicity have used SUM as aggregation operator for both, but they will be different)
select product_id, year, HIERARCHY1_ID, HIERARCHY2_ID,
sum(m1_total) m1_total_1, sum(m3_total) m3_total_1, sum(m7_total) m7_total_1, sum(m9_total) m9_total_1
from
select product_id, HIERARCHY1_ID , HIERARCHY2_ID , year,
sum(m1) m1_total, sum(m3) m3_total, sum(m7) m7_total, sum(m9) m9_total
from
select product_id, lht.HIERARCHY1_ID , lht.HIERARCHY2_ID , lht.HIERARCHY3_ID ,lht.location_id, cht.HIERARCHY1_ID year, cht.HIERARCHY2_ID quarter, cht.HIERARCHY3_ID month, cht.calendar_id week,m1,m3,m7,m9
from
retailer_sales_tbl RS, calendar_hierarchy_tree cht, location_hierarchy_tree lht
WHERE RS.period_id = cht.CALENDAR_ID
and RS.location_id = lht.location_id
and cht.CALENDAR_ID in (10,236,237,238,239,608,609,610,611,612,613,614,615,616,617,618,619,1426,1427,1428,1429,1430,1431,1432,1433,1434,1435,1436,1437,1438,1439,1440,1441,1442,1443,1444,1445,1446,1447,1448,1449,1450,1451,1452,1453,1454,1455,1456,1457,1458,1459,1460,1461,1462,1463,1464,1465,1466,1467,1468,1469,1470,1471,1472,1473,1474,1475,1476,1477)
AND product_id IN (5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20)
AND lht.location_id IN (2, 3, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 4, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20)
GROUP BY product_id, HIERARCHY1_ID , HIERARCHY2_ID , HIERARCHY3_ID , location_id, year
) sales_time
GROUP BY product_id, year,HIERARCHY1_ID, HIERARCHY2_ID
This Query rewrites only with my_dim_mvw_calendar. (as saw in Query Plan and EXPLAIN_MVIEW). But we would like it to use my_dim_mvw_location as that has aggregations for both dimensions.

blackhole001 wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to make my programmer's life easier by creating a database view for them to query the data, so they don't have to worry about joining tables. This sounds like a pretty horrible idea. I say this because you will eventually end up with programmers that know nothing about your data model and how to properly interact with it.
Additionally, what you will get is a developer that takes one of your views and see's that of the 20 columns in it, it has 4 that he needs. If all those 4 columns comes from a simple 2 table join, but the view has 8 tables, you're wasting a tonne of resources by using the view (and heaven forbid they have to join that view to another view to get 4 of the 20 columns from that other view as well).
Ideally you'd write stored routines that satisfy exactly what is required (if you are the database resource and these other programmers are java, .net, etc... based) and the front end developers would call those routines customized for an exact purpose.
Creating views is not bad, but it's by no means a proper solution to having developers not learn or understand SQL and/or the data model.

Best way to batch resize images in nested folder hierarchy?

Hello,
I'm looking for help on [what is probably] a classic problem related to content sites.
I'm launching a content site that has numerous articles, and attached to each article is a number of images. The raw site assets are currently set up in a folder hierarchy like this:
Overall site assets folder
Category One folder
Article One folder
Unmodified images folder
Resized, production-ready images folder
Article Two folder
Unmodified images folder
Resized, production-ready images folder
Etc..., etc....
There are hundreds of articles in this hierarchy.
I'm looking for a script that will take every image in each "Unmodified" folder and save a resized copy to the "Resized" folder, preferably with different settings for vertical and horizontal images (though I'll be OK with just fixing the width if need be).
I realize that I can do this manually and locally within each folder with a droplet, but between droplets / actions / plug-ins or third-party tools, is there an easy way to accomplish this across a large nested hierarchy with many folders as long as the Unmodified and Resized folders are nested together? And what about horizontal vs. vertical images?
THANKS!!!!!!
Scott

Ahhh, I understand what you're saying. I'm downloading and installing this CS6 script, which might be along the lines of what I'm looking for:
Dr. Brown Services - Image Processor Pro
http://www.e-zest.net/blog/photoshop-cs6-save-for-web-images-batch-processing-keeping-nest ed-folder-structure-intact/
Photoshop supports recording the actions and the facility to run that action for batch processing. But it also has a couple of limitations up to Photoshop cs6 as mentioned below –
Photoshop does not maintain the source, hereditary/nested folder structure for the output (destination) images. Save for web only saves all the files to the folder specified when you record the action.
In case of some file handling issues, Photoshop action throws an error & pauses/stops working, wherein we need to skip these errors manually.
I I tried to Google it to find answers and also tried couple of JavaScript solutions such as the – SFW Batch Processor, SFWCS4-5, Picture Processor etc., but unfortunately all of them didn’t work for me. Either it gave up or stopped working or even threw errors for PhotoshopCS6 and CS2.
Thanks to Russell Brown for providing new CS6 Extension script to resolve the ‘save for web’ batch processing issue like maintaining the images nesting folder structure.
Not sure if it does exactly what I need, but checking....
Best,
Scott

[svn:fx-trunk] 9287: Fixes bug with shader-transition effects ( AnimateTransitionShader, Wipe, and CrossFade) when acting on targets that either have filters or are inside a hierarchy with filters .

Revision: 9287
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-08-13 15:53:43 -0700 (Thu, 13 Aug 2009)
Log Message:
Fixes bug with shader-transition effects (AnimateTransitionShader, Wipe, and CrossFade) when acting on targets that either have filters or are inside a hierarchy with filters. Fix was to capture the bitmap snapshot of the target without any of its own filters applied and to then use the ShaderFilter in conjunction with the target's filters during the animation.
QE notes: Probably need more tests in this area, now that we handle it
Doc notes: none
Bugs: sdk-20250
Reviewer: Jason
Tests run: Checkintests, Mustella (spark/effects/[AnimateTransitionShader|Wipe|CrossFade])
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-20250
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/AnimateTransitionShader.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/supportClasses/AnimateTransiti onShaderInstance.as

Lots to be excited about. BUT...Just updated to 8.1 on one of my computers to test it out...
Sadly, the following issue is NOT fixed for me. Is it with new projects only? I haven't started a new project on 8.1 I've only opened an old project but the issue that I'm referring to which involves also a delay/freeze of anywhere from a few seconds to a MINUTE while the render bar goes from yellow to red and then back to yellow is still there. Boo.
On the list above...
Switching between sequences can turn the render bar red.
This issue is incredibly easy to replicate. I really do hope it gets fixed. Here are the steps:
1) Create two sequences with multiple short clips (the more clips the better)
2) Make sure GPU acceleration is enabled.
3) Add warp stabilizer to the clips in both sequences. Again, the more clips the longer the delay/freeze will be as the render bar goes from YELLOW to RED and then eventually back to YELLOW again.
4) Hit SAVE.
5) Now, toggle between sequences. You'll hit a short delay with a few clips stabilized and a LONG delay with lots stabilized. In my case this delay is around a full minute. The render bar will go from YELLOW to RED and then back to yellow...eventually.
6) Toggle back to the original sequence and the delay occurs again.
7) Once you've toggled between sequences and have gone through this delay, that's it, there is no longer a delay...UNTIL...(and here's the big kicker)...until the project is SAVED again. After that the issue returns when you toggle between sequences. Both saving manually and AUTOSAVING cause this issue. No way around it except not editing with GPU acceleration.
Not sure what the issue is...caching issue when saving maybe? Either way, it stinks and it's still there in 8.1. Big bummer.
Again, lots to be excited about with this release but I really was hopefully this specific issue was resolved.
Sigh.

Is there a recommended limit on the number of custom sections and the cells per table so that there are no performance issues with the UI?

Is there a recommended limit on the number of custom sections and the cells per table so that there are no performance issues with the UI?

Thanks Kelly,
The answers would be the following:
1200 cells per custom section (NEW COUNT), and up to 30 custom sections per spec.
Assuming all will be populated, and this would apply to all final material specs in the system which could be ~25% of all material specs.
The cells will be numeric, free text, drop downs, and some calculated numeric.
Are we reaching the limits for UI performance?
Thanks

BO Webi report hierarchy with measure values showing more(almost double value) compare to BW Bex report

Hi,
In our BO Webi report hierarchy with measure values showing more(almost double value) compare to BW Bex report. Can any one please help on this.
Is it BW problem or BO problem?
I checked in some other threads but it's not given solution.
Thanks,
Manjunatha

Hi,
Is it BW problem or BO problem? : BO
is it causing problem with hierarchly data only ? without hierarchies data is matching or not?
Post same in SAP BusinessObjects Web Intelligence .
Thanks.

TS2755 Me and my wife r sharing the same Apple ID, with the conversion IOS7 all of a sudden my wife can read all my sended and received iMessages! What t.f is going on? I tried all kind of things, pls help

Gentlemen,
Me and my wife r sharing the same Apple ID, with the conversion to IOS7 all of the sended and received iMessages on my phone comes in also on my wife's phone! Tried all kind of things, pls help
Marco

Are you both using the same Apple ID?
What do you have here:
Settings > Phone > My Number > ?

Issue with PR conversion to PO using ME59 withqty of similar line items

Hi All,
I'm having an issue with PR conversion to PO using ME59
I have a PR with the following line items with all same details except quantity
ex 1
Mat Qty Unit Plant   St Loc
M1   1    EA   P1      S1
M1   29   EA   P1      S1
The PR brings in the Unit automatically
EA is Base Unit Of Measure -Material Master
BT is Order Unit           -Material Master
Conversion
30 EA = 1BT
When i convert this PR to PO using ME59N then i see 2 lines items
M1   1   BT
M2   1   BT
Its doubling the qty (2 BT = 60 EA)
ex 2
Mat Qty Unit Plant   St Loc
M1   1    EA   P1      S1
M1   2    EA   P1      S1
M1   27   EA   P1      S1
The PR brings in the Unit automatically
EA is Base Unit Of Measure -Material Master
BT is Order Unit           -Material Master
Conversion
30 EA = 1BT
When i convert this PR to PO using ME59N then i see 2 lines items
M1   1   BT
M1   1   BT
M1   1   BT
Its 3 times no
PR Qty = 30 EA
PO qty = 3 BT = 90 EA
I guess during conversion to PO
It sees PR Line item 1 and looks for another line items with similar fields ( in our case it sees line 2 in ex 1 and 2 and 3 in ex 2)
i adds the qty 1 and 29 in ex1 and converts the total 30 each to 1 BT and when it moves to 2 line it see item1 and again creates 1BT but the line item 2 was already considered and it should be ignored
Similarly if you see ex2 then it creates 3 limes with 1 BT each
Let me know how to resolve this issue
Thanks

As for std SAP ME59N - make sure there is not rounding value is activated in the Material master as well as info record
If this is not the case than check any custom code is activated for ME59N
becuase generally in many compnay when they use ME59n they don't want the same material from diff PR to create the diff line item in the PO so using the custom logic in the user exist they trick the code
it might be the case for you where you have issue.

Dynamic file name in receiver - empty line problem with content conversion

Hi,
I do a variable substitution from a filename node in my xml structure. Because I don't want to have the the filename in my flatfile i supress the output with the conversion parameters:
filename.fixedLengthTooShortHandling = Cut
filename.fieldFixedLengths = 0
It's working but: the adapter is puting an empty line at the end of the file. If I even put the filename node at the top of the xml struture it generates the empty line at the top of the flatfile.
Anyone has an idea? is there an other way to set the filename or how can I supress this empty line( I have to) ?
Regrads
J.

Jorg,
Actually speaking we cannot get rid of this with XI. You have to write a OS script to remove this.
Else
you add one more parameter as .endSeparator as backspace ie., 0x08. It will definitely remove the line but I think it is putting a square box at the end of previous line. Please check by giving this and let us know the updates.
Regards,
---Satish

Sender File Adapter with file conversion

Hi guys,
Im using a Sender File adapter with file conversion. The message to be processed has a structure with fixed lengths and in your content are some values that needs to be ignored.
An example:
value1 value2 value3
I want to ignore value 2 but I cant find a parameter for that! Do I need to define dummy fields on my data type and ignore those fields during mapping? Or there is a specific parameter for that?
Thanks in advance,
Ricardo.

hi,
there always is another way:)
you can import the whole line to one field
and cut it inside the adapter module
(then you can define start and stop of the substring that you need to use)
but of course it's not standard even though it's quite easy to achieve in java
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions">XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</a>

10g Dimension Hierarchy with strange behaviour

I have a Dimension Table (Calendar) with the following columns:
Date------Year------Semester-----Desc_Sem-------Trimester-------Desc_Trimester--------Month------Desc_Month-------Day
20110101---2011--------1-----------1st Semester----------1----------------1st Trimester---------1-------------January---------1
20111231---2011--------2-----------2nd Semester----------4---------------4th Trimester--------12-------------December--------31
My hierachy looks like this: !http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/851/bmm.jpg/!
What happens is that when i drill down everything is ok until the Month level but when i try to drill down from the Month level to the Day level it only shows results if i drill down on February!!!
!http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/830/drilln.jpg/!
A bit more information to add here:
- If on the hierarchy level "Month" instead of "Desc_Month" as the logical level key i choose "Month" (1,2...12) than i have no problems with the drill and it works perfectly...
- I tried the same thing on the samplesales.rpd and the exactly same thing happens. The hierachy there is Year->Half->Quarter->Month->Week->Day and when we drill from Month to Week we also get no results.
Any ideas here? I've searched for some time now and haven't seen anything that can help me here, to be honest i didn't even find a problem similar to this one.
Thanks

Not sure if this is the cause, but your hierarchy isn't strictly correct.
In a hierarchy, the key of each node needs to relate to only one parent. You have Day 1 which could belong to January, February etc. This isn't a key, it's an attribute of the detail level. Likewise, your semester doesn't belong to one year, your quarter doesn't belong to one semester etc.
With the data you have, the 'hierarchy' should be very flat:
[Grand Total]
--[Year]
----[Detail] (key is date, and day is an attribute)
--[Semester]
----[Detail]
--[Trimester]
----[Detail]
--[Month]
----[Detail]
You could define drills paths between levels to sort out your navigation.
If you want your original hierarchy, then your calendar table needs key fields to identify the parentage.
Eg Semester key is 2011-1, 2011-2. Description is 1st Semester.
This is especially important if you move to 11g and want to use the hierarchy features.
Regards,
Robert
Edited by: Robert Tooker on Nov 25, 2011 2:29 AM

I'm looking for a capture device that is compatible with Adobe Flash Media Live Encoder. I bought elgato but it is not compatible. Anyone know?

I'm looking for a capture device that is compatible with Adobe Flash Media Live Encoder. I bought elgato but it is not compatible. Anyone know?

This is just a shot in the dark....
Do you have all your devices hooked up (and on) when you launch FMLE? For example -- your camera or digitizer? When FMLE launches it will try to launch with the last known settings... including input devices. If it can't find these devices (they're not hooked up and on) it can crash, although in most situations it will simply show a default screen with default settings.
If you do have your equipment hooked up (and on) when you launch FMLE, try unplugging them and then launching FMLE so that it opens up in default configuration mode (no input devices selected; all default settings). Then uncheck the "preview" boxes for both your input and output preview windows. Close FMLE and then plug in your equipment (and turn it on) and relaunch FMLE. I offer this suggestion as FMLE can sometimes act funny when the preview windows are open with certain types of input devices. Don't worry -- you don't have to keep the preview windows off forever. If you can get FMLE to successfully launch with the preview windows off, then you can set your settings however you like and save the profile. Then quit and relaunch FMLE and then turn the preview windows back on and see if it works. If it does, great. Just be aware that making any settings changes while the preview windows are open could result in FMLE crashing. Again -- this only happens with some capture devices, such as certain Dazzle capture boxes.
If none of this works, you could always try to upgrade to FMLE 3.2 and see if that solves your problem.

Capturing a nested "Section" hierarchy with a Conversion Table?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for