CE 7.1 Ehp1 SP5 on Oracle 10.2.0.4 Performance - XSS track import of SCAs

Hi,
I'm currently building a new track on my newly built CE server which has the NWDI capability configured. I've had a few problems importing the SCA files into the track. I've been getting DTR internal server errors. Looking through the logs I couldn't see a specific reason as per OSS 774339 and the subsequent notes this refers to. After restarting the CE server I've imported the SCA files individually and this has at least enabled me to get the SCA files imported without error.
The time taken to import is very long - the ESS SCA file (290 MB) took 3.5 hours alone.
I've read OSS 1361525 which is related to DTR performance with Oracle but the Patch provided is for 7.01 / 7.02 releases of CE.
I have already patched my CE 7.1 Ehp1 SP5 server with the available patches for DICMS05, DICLIENTS05 & DICBS05* - there is none current available for download for the DIDTR05* CE 7.1 Ehp1 release.
Can anyone suggest what could be done to reduce the import runtimes ?.
I'm regularly updating the Oracle Statistics as per OSS 1229080 and the Oracle params have been set as per OSS 830576.
Regards,
Brian.

Hi Ervin,
1. The NWDI Server is a distributed configuration - the DB instance is on it's own Solaris 10 zone and the central services & instance are on another Solaris zone. Both zones have plenty CPU/Memory resources and the load values on both are low. The systems are not overloaded.
2. THis is a new build and I'm setting up the first track to enable the customer to start a XSS development project. The first 10 or so SCs imported without error into the track. ESS, MSS & PCUI_GP SCA files are the ones remaining and are failing to import.
3. Our OS is Solaris 10 on Sun Sparc - so no windows type anti-virus software to contend with.
4. I've run the statistics a few times over the last day or so :-
brconnect -u / -c -o summary -f stats -o SAPSR3DB -t all -p 8 -f nocasc
5. Trace levels are default.
6. The logs & traces have no OutOfMemory errors as per OSS 1001502. The error received is :-
20100908171424 Info   :Starting Step CBS-make at 2010-09-08 17:14:24.0632 +1:00
20100908171425 Info   :wait until CBS queue of buildspace S01_Sandbox_D is completely processed, before starting the import
20100908171425 Info   :CBS queue of buildspace S01_Sandbox_D is completely processed. Starting the import now.
20100908181425 Fatal :CBS throws exception during activation:
20100908181425 Fatal :caused by Exception:com.sap.tc.cbs.client.error.CommunicationException: Read timed out (Service call exception; nested exception is:
     java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out):Read timed out (Service call exception; nested exception is:
     java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out)
The interesting thing here is that the error is thrown exactly one hour after the CBS-make operation starts.
7. We've got Oracle DB.
Hopefully you'll be able to suggest how best I can resolve the error and continue.
Also - from the logs there was further error activity for this same import operation 3 hours later after I'd gone home :-
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:064#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBS/Service#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D058200680000000E000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.rt.rq.RequestOrc####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[CBS Request Orc,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
Request arranged for processing for BuildSpace S01_Sandbox_D. [bsID:3, rID:62, node:14060650]#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:086#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D058200690000006F000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.dao.impl.Request####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
Build number assigned: 67#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:088#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000070000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.dao.impl.Request####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
Change request state from QUEUED to PROCESSING#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:095#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000071000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:096#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000072000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
REQUEST PROCESSING started at 2010-09-08 20:34:50.095 GMT#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:098#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000073000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.proc.RequestHandler####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
    ACTIVATION request in Build Space "S01_Sandbox_D" at Node ID: 14,060,650
        [id: 62; parentID: 0; type: 4]
        [options: IGNORE BROKEN DC, FORCE ACTIVATE PREDECESSORS, FORCE INTEGRATED, IGNORE COMPONENT INTERSECTION]#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:149#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000074000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:150#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000075000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
    Waiting for access: 54 ms#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:151#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000076000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:151#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000077000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
    ===== Pre-Processing ===== started at 2010-09-08 20:34:50.150 GMT#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:152#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000078000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.proc.impl.ActivationPreProcessor####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
        List of requested for activation activities:#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:184#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000079000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.proc.impl.ActivationPreProcessor####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
            ''sap.com_SAPPCUI_GP_1'' compartment#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:184#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D058200690000007A000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.proc.impl.ActivationPreProcessor####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
                CMS_sap.com_SAPPCUI_GP_590_aabfda99de4511d9b84800300530c04f#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:185#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D058200690000007B000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.proc.impl.ActivationPreProcessor####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
                    [ISN 2][created by MAIN at 2010-09-08 17:14:24.0][OID e4fdda79781d11dec2470030057116fe]#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:185#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D058200690000007C000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.proc.impl.ActivationPreProcessor####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
            There is 1 activity in compartment sap.com_SAPPCUI_GP_1#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:186#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D058200690000007D000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.proc.impl.ActivationPreProcessor####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
            1 activity will be processed by this request#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:647#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D058200690000007E000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:648#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D058200690000007F000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
        Analyze dependencies to predecessor activities... started at 2010-09-08 20:34:50.647 GMT#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:648#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000080000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.proc.impl.ActivationPreProcessor####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
            Analyzing predecessors in compartment "sap.com_SAPPCUI_GP_1"#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:669#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000081000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.proc.impl.ActivationPreProcessor####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
                No dependencies to predecessor activities found.#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:669#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000082000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
        Analyze dependencies to predecessor activities... finished at 2010-09-08 20:34:50.669 GMT and took 22 ms#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:670#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000083000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:670#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000084000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
        Analyze versions... started at 2010-09-08 20:34:50.670 GMT#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:712#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000085000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
            ===== Pre-Processing ===== finished at 2010-09-08 20:34:50.711 GMT and took 561 ms#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:712#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000086000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.dao.impl.Request####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
            Change request state from PROCESSING to FAILED#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:713#+0100#Error#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000087000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.proc.RequestHandler####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
            Error! The following problem(s) occurred during request processing:#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:713#+0100#Error#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D0582006900000089000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.proc.RequestHandler####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
            Error! The following error occurred during request processing:Server error [500 Internal Server Error]#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:714#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D058200690000008B000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.RequestPerformanceMeter####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
        REQUEST PROCESSING finished at 2010-09-08 20:34:50.714 GMT and took 619 ms#
#2.#2010 09 08 21:34:50:728#+0100#Info#/Applications/CBSRequestLog/RequestProcessing/id67#
#BC-CTS-CBS#tc.CBS.Service#0021286D058200690000008C000004DB#14060650000000783##com.sap.tc.cbs.server.dao.impl.Request####97674940BB5111DFA9180021286D0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#97674940bb5111dfa9180021286d0582#0#Thread[SystemThreadGroup - 70,5,SystemThreadGroup]#Plain##
Regards,
Brian.

Similar Messages

Issue installing PI 7.1 EHP1 on AIX,Oracle

Hi Friends,
I am installing PI 7.1 EHP1 on AIX,Oracle.Iam facing some issue during installation(25th phase of installation).
I have 10 Gb RAM and 20 Gb SWAP.
Do you have any idea?
sapinst.log:
13.10.2009 11:02:22
GetProcessList
FAIL: NIECONN_REFUSED (Connection refused), NiRawConnect failed in plugin_fopen()
INFO 2009-10-13 11:02:22.229
Connect to message server (s0001079/3901) succeeded.
INFO 2009-10-13 11:02:22.229
Disconnect from message server (s0001079/3901) succeeded.
WARNING[E] 2009-10-13 11:02:22.240
CJS-30087 Instance XDN/SCS01 [PARTIAL] did not stop after 2:00 minutes. Giving up.
ERROR 2009-10-13 11:02:23.421
FCO-00011 The step stopInstance with step key |NW_Onehost|ind|ind|ind|ind|0|0|NW_Onehost_System|ind|ind|ind|ind|1|0|NW_CI_Instance|ind|ind|ind|ind|11|0|NW_Instance|ind|ind|ind|ind|1|0|stopInstance was executed with status ERROR .
WARNING 2009-10-13 11:02:23.576
Could not get property IDs of the JavaScript object.
ERROR 2009-10-13 11:02:23.577
FJS-00010 Could not get value for property .

Hi Milos,
The problem is with the starting of the SCS instance by sapinst, on AIX the port that we used (SAP default) 3901 during the input step for SCS was in usage at AIX by some application
nimsh 3901/tcp # NIM Service Handler
nimsh 3901/udp # NIM Service Handler
I had to free up the port for some time, stop processes running on the port and then continued with my installation. After the installation was complete, I changed the port number of SCS to 3601 and gave the port back to AIX application.
Beaware that you have to change the port number is various places, including Config tool, all the JSPM, Configtool properties
Check if this helps to resolve your problem, else I will have to recollect if I resolved it differently.
Regards,
Nilesh

Upgrading as abap 7.0 SP17 to as abap 7.01 ehp1 sp5 BI system

hi all
i'm upgrading as abap 7.0 SP17 to as abap 7.01 ehp1 sp5
during the phase preprocessing i get the following error
The EhP Installation program builds the shadow system from the original
one.
in the logfile TPSQLSTD.OUT
TRACE-INFO: 105: dev trc ,00000 SELECT VERSION FROM SVERSTRACE-INFO: 106:
11 0.100363
TRACE-INFO: 107: dev trc ,00000 DbSlRead(): table='SVERS'
21 0.100384
TRACE-INFO: 108: dev trc ,00000 OCI-call failed with -
1=OCI_ERROR
668 0.101052
TRACE-INFO: 109: dev trc ,00000 SQL error 942: 'ORA-00942:
table or view does no
t exist'
TRACE-INFO: 110:
10 0.101062
TRACE-INFO: 111: dev trc ,00000 set_ocica() -> OCI or SQL
return code 942
12 0.101074
TRACE-INFO: 112: dblink ,01299 ***LOG BZA=>table SVERS
does not exist on data
base dblink#5 @ 1299
TRACE-INFO: 113:
any idea
regards tom

Hi,
> 10 0.101062
> TRACE-INFO: 111: [dev trc ,00000] set_ocica() -> OCI or SQL
> return code 942
> 12 0.101074
> TRACE-INFO: 112: [dblink ,01299] ***LOG BZA=>table SVERS
> does not exist on data
> base [dblink#5 @ 1299]
> TRACE-INFO: 113:
Check SVERS table exist or not ?
Also, check SAP Note 662644 - Composite SAP Note: ORA-00942
Thanks
Sunny

Upgrade Enterprise Portal from EHP1 SP5 to EHP2 SP7

How do we upgrade from EHP1 SP5 to EHP2 SP7 ?
Can we do that directly from JSPM or i should go with ehpi ?
Just download all the files of EHP2 SP7 to EPS/in directlry and start JSPM ?
or
Upgrade EHP1 to SP5 then run PREPARE tasks from the DVD's then apply the SP's.
Let me know your thoughts.
Thanks

Hi Markus,
I've upgraded Standalone JAVA stack from EHP1 -> EHP2 and basically, what EHPI did was just call up JSPM and perform the upgrade. Therefore, is feasible to upgrade standalone JAVA system via JSPM, of cos generate XML with MOPZ.
also, from sap note 1472520:
8. Question: Can I use JSPM for applying EHPs on JAVA only systems?
Answer:
Yes. On Java standalone systems it makes more sense using JSPM as a standalone tool using 'support package stack' option instead of running EHPI. Whereas on dual stack (ABAP + Java systems) you have to use EHPI with the exception of Solution Manager systems (see SAP note 1245473 for SolMan EHP installations).
Cheers,
Nicholas Chang

Class oracle.xml.sql.query.OracleXMLQuery not found in import

I tried to perform load java using a non-sys user :
loadjava -user user1/passwd -v -o -r Archive.java
but encountered the following error:
Errors in Archive:
ORA-29535: source requires recompilation
Archive:11: Class oracle.xml.sql.query.OracleXMLQuery not found in import.
Info: 1 errors
loadjava: 3 errors
But if I use sys user I don't have any error:
loadjava -user sys/manager -v -o -r Arachive.java
initialization complete
loading : Archive
creating : Archive
resolver :
resolving: Archive
Why is this so?
ANy security setup that I missed?
Thanks in advance.
Note:
my Archive.java file contains:
// Core Java Classes
import java.io.*;
import java.sql.*;
// Oracle Java classes
import oracle.jdbc.*;
import oracle.jdbc.driver.*;
import oracle.xml.sql.query.OracleXMLQuery;
null

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Azman Diron ([email protected]):
I tried to perform load java using a non-sys user :
loadjava -user user1/passwd -v -o -r Archive.java
but encountered the following error:
Errors in Archive:
ORA-29535: source requires recompilation
Archive:11: Class oracle.xml.sql.query.OracleXMLQuery not found in import.
Info: 1 errors
loadjava: 3 errors
But if I use sys user I don't have any error:
loadjava -user sys/manager -v -o -r Arachive.java
initialization complete
loading : Archive
creating : Archive
resolver :
resolving: Archive
Why is this so?
ANy security setup that I missed?
Thanks in advance.
Note:
my Archive.java file contains:
// Core Java Classes
import java.io.*;
import java.sql.*;
// Oracle Java classes
import oracle.jdbc.*;
import oracle.jdbc.driver.*;
import oracle.xml.sql.query.OracleXMLQuery;
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Managed to solve this problem.
Drop all xml objects owned by sys and user1.
Reload xml objcets for user1 with -force option.
null

I export dump from oracle database 8.1.7 and try to import in 10.2.0. while import its prompt error

I export dump from oracle database 8.1.7 and try to import in 10.2.0. while import its prompt error as follow
8.1.7
SQL> select * from nls_database_parameters where parameter like '%SET%';
PARAMETER                      VALUE
NLS_CHARACTERSET               US7ASCII
NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET         US7ASCII
10.2.0
SQL> select * from nls_database_parameters where parameter like '%SET%';
PARAMETER                      VALUE
NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET         AL16UTF16
NLS_CHARACTERSET               WE8MSWIN1252
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>imp system/manager file=H:\CGlByte\cglby
te_03-07-2013Wed.dmp fromuser=system touser=cglbyte ignore=y
Import: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Thu Jul 4 16:11:49 2013
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Produc
tion
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
Export file created by EXPORT:V08.01.07 via conventional path
import done in US7ASCII character set and AL16UTF16 NCHAR character set
import server uses WE8MSWIN1252 character set (possible charset conversion)
export client uses WE8ISO8859P1 character set (possible charset conversion)
export server uses US7ASCII NCHAR character set (possible ncharset conversion)
Import terminated successfully without warnings.
Pl suggest remedy
Regards,

8.1.7
AMERICAN_AMERICA.WE8ISO8859P1
10.2.0
AMERICAN_AMERICA.WE8MSWIN1252
exp system/manager file=d:\cgl.dmp owner=cgl, even i set character set before export but no impact

Needed help on connecting weblogic 8.1 SP5 with oracle 10g and mysql 5.0

Hi !!
Hope you are doing well...
Can anyone tell me how to connect weblogic 8.1 SP5 with an oracle 10g DB on windows..
also, how to connect weblogic 8.1 SP5 with mysql 5.0 on windows..
Please step by step... very urgent..
Thanks!! Jhonson

Shouldn't this be posted in BEA forums?
Try getting help there and if you encounter any Oracle related exception, you can post here.

JTA with WLS 8.1 sp5 and Oracle 10.1.0.4

Hi,
          I am testing a global transaction involving two EJBs (stateless session beans) running on two separate WebLogic servers. Each ejb calls an Oracle stored procedure against a different datbase. One ejb is deployed on one server the other one on the second server.
          I want to know if it is mandatory to set up a trust relationship between the two servers. The reason I ask is that it seems the transaction is working without it (with the SecurityIdentity automatically downgraded to 'anonymous').
          However it only seems to consistently work between certain servers and randomly failing when using a different pair of servers.
          Thanks
          Cristian

Cristian Mihaila wrote:
          > Hi Joe,
          >
          > Here is the stack trace :
          Ok, you should make sure you're using consistent SecurityInteropMode settings
          on the different servers. Trust is only needed if the servers are on different
          domains otherwise trust is not needed. We made many changes to correct a downgrade
          issue on different subsystems JTA, JMS, EJB in 81sp6. There is a patch
          available for 81sp5 for this.
          Please read: http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/ConsoleHelp/jta.html#1120356
          Joe
          >
          > <Feb 20, 2007 11:53:54 AM EST> <Error> <EJB> <BEA-010026> <Exception occurred during commit of transaction Name=[EJB com.loyalty.arrow.services.epin.ejb.EPinFacadeSession.authenticate(java.lang.String,java.lang.String,java.lang.String,java.lang.String)],Xid=BEA1-02DD480140BE7F28EDB9(12622847),Status
          > =Rolling Back. [Reason=weblogic.transaction.internal.TimedOutException: Transaction timed out after 29 seconds
          > BEA1-02DD480140BE7F28EDB9],numRepliesOwedMe=0,numRepliesOwedOthers=0,seconds since begin=89,seconds left=10,XAServerResourceInfo[OmdbXMultiPool]=(ServerResourceInfo[OmdbXMultiPool]=(state=new,assigned=pinpp2),xar=null,re-Registered = false),SCInfo[pinpp+pinpp2]=(state=rolling-back),SCInfo[mydomain+m
          > yserver]=(state=rolledback),properties=({weblogic.transaction.name=[EJB com.loyalty.arrow.services.epin.ejb.EPinFacadeSession.authenticate(java.lang.String,java.lang.String,java.lang.String,java.lang.String)]}),OwnerTransactionManager=ServerTM[ServerCoordinatorDescriptor=(CoordinatorURL=myserver+159
          > .175.18.251:7001+mydomain+t3+, XAResources={JMS_FileStore, shadbConnectionPool, arrow1lclprdPool},NonXAResources={})],CoordinatorURL=myserver+159.175.18.251:7001+mydomain+t3+): weblogic.transaction.internal.TimedOutException: Transaction timed out after 29 seconds
          > BEA1-02DD480140BE7F28EDB9
          > at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.wakeUp(ServerTransactionImpl.java:1600)
          > at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionManagerImpl.processTimedOutTransactions(ServerTransactionManagerImpl.java:1147)
          > at weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionManagerImpl.wakeUp(TransactionManagerImpl.java:1882)
          > at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionManagerImpl.wakeUp(ServerTransactionManagerImpl.java:1064)
          > at weblogic.transaction.internal.WLSTimer.trigger(WLSTimer.java:31)
          > at weblogic.time.common.internal.ScheduledTrigger.run(ScheduledTrigger.java:243)
          > at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
          > at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:121)
          > at weblogic.time.common.internal.ScheduledTrigger.executeLocally(ScheduledTrigger.java:229)
          > at weblogic.time.common.internal.ScheduledTrigger.execute(ScheduledTrigger.java:223)
          > at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:224)
          > at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:183)
          > --------------- nested within: ------------------
          > weblogic.transaction.RollbackException: Transaction timed out after 29 seconds
          > BEA1-02DD480140BE7F28EDB9 - with nested exception:
          > [weblogic.transaction.internal.TimedOutException: Transaction timed out after 29 seconds
          > BEA1-02DD480140BE7F28EDB9]
          > at weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl.throwRollbackException(TransactionImpl.java:1684)
          > at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.internalCommit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:311)
          > at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.commit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:228)
          > at weblogic.ejb20.internal.BaseEJBObject.postInvoke(BaseEJBObject.java:320)
          > at weblogic.ejb20.internal.StatelessEJBObject.postInvoke(StatelessEJBObject.java:168)
          > at com.loyalty.arrow.services.epin.ejb.EPinFacade_y6z7xe_EOImpl.authenticate(EPinFacade_y6z7xe_EOImpl.java:110)
          > at com.loyalty.arrow.services.epin.ejb.EPinFacade_y6z7xe_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
          > at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:492)
          > at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ReplicaAwareServerRef.invoke(ReplicaAwareServerRef.java:108)
          > at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:435)
          > at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
          > at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:147)
          > at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:430)
          > at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicExecuteRequest.execute(BasicExecuteRequest.java:35)
          > at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:224)
          > at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:183)
          >
          > Thanks
          > Cristian

Any known issues on upgrading SAP Netweaver from 7.0 EHP1 SP5 to SP6

Hi All,
Please let me know the implications after upgrading our portal from 7.0 SP19 to SP21 and also Netweaver ABAP stack from BW 7.0 EHP1 SP 5 to 7.0 EHP1 SP6.
Thanks & Regards,
Sowmya
Edited by: Sowmya B on Apr 15, 2010 2:27 PM
Edited by: Sowmya B on Apr 16, 2010 6:44 AM

Hi Experts,
We're in the process of upgrading SAP NW 7.0 EhP1 SP3 to SP10 using Enterprise Portal. I download the all the patches MOPZ via in Solution Manager System. NW 7.0 EhP1 SP10 Related patches successfully downloaded. But i didnt get
Enterprise Portal related patches for Example.
sap.com/CAF-KM.SCA
sap.com/EP-PSERV.SCA
sap.com/EP-WDC.SCA
sap.com/EPBC.SCA
sap.com/EPBC2.SCA
sap.com/KMC-BC.SCA
sap.com/KMC-CM.SCA
sap.com/KMC-COLL.SCA
sap.com/LM-PORTAL.SCA
sap.com/NET-PDK.SCA
sap.com/RTC.SCA
sap.com/RTC-STREAM.SCA
sap.com/SAP-EU.SCA
sap.com/SAP_BUILDT.SCA
I serached through SMP, But I am getting NW 7.00 releated patches, But our current running pathes NW 7.0 EhP1 SP03 upgrade plan for SP10. Please How to download the Those Patches. Thanks for All.
Thanks,
Selva

Unable to download Oracle Data Integrator-Version 11.1.1.6(Important)

Unable to download Oracle Data Integrator with version 11.1.1.6.Hope this could be resolved ASAP.

966234 wrote:
Unable to download Oracle Data Integrator with version 11.1.1.6.Hope this could be resolved ASAP.What is the file you are trying to download? Is it for Windows or Linux or All Platforms?
Thanks,
Hussein

URGENT: Migrating from SQL to Oracle results in very poor performance!

*** IMPORTANT, NEED YOUR HELP ***
Dear, I have a banking business solution from Windows/SQL Server 2000 to Sun Solaris/ORACLE 10g migrated. In the test environment everything was working fine. On the production system we have very poor DB performance. About 100 times slower than SQL Server 2000!
Environment at Customer Server Side:
Hardware: SUN Fire 4 CPU's, OS: Solaris 5.8, DB Oracle 8 and 10
Data Storage: Em2
DB access thru OCCI [Environment:OBJECT, Connection Pool, Create Connection]
Depending from older applications it's necessary to run ORACLE 8 as well on the same Server. Since we have running the new solution, which is using ORACLE 10, the listener for ORACLE 8 is frequently gone (or by someone killed?). The performance of the whole ORACLE 10 Environment is very poor. As a result of my analyse I figured out that the process to create a connection to the connection pool takes up to 14 seconds. Now I am wondering if it a problem to run different ORACLE versions on the same Server? The Customer has installed/created the new ORACLE 10 DB with the same user account (oracle) as the older version. To run the new solution we have to change the ORACLE environment settings manually. All hints/suggestions to solve this problem are welcome. Thanks in advance.
Anton

On the production system we have very poor DB performanceHave you identified the cause of the poor performance is not the queries and their plans being generated by the database?
Do you know if some of the queries appear to take more time than what it used to be on old system? Did you analyze such queries to see what might be the problem?
Are you running RBO or CBO?
if stats are generated, how are they generated and how often?
Did you see what autotrace and tkprof has to tell you about problem queries (if in fact such queries have been identified)?
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/server.101/b10752/sqltrace.htm#1052

[Oracle 8i] Help with query performance

The following query is running VERY slowly for me:
SELECT     oord.part_nbr
,     sopn.ord_nbr
,     sopn.sub_ord_nbr
,     sopn.major_seq_nbr
,     sopn.wctr_id
,     sopn.oper_desc
,     SUM(pact.act_dlrs_earned+pact.act_brdn_dls_earned+pact.tool_dlrs_earned+pact.act_fix_brdn_dls_ea)
,     pact.activity_date
FROM     PACT pact
,     SOPN sopn
,     OORD oord
WHERE     pact.order_nbr          = sopn.ord_nbr          AND
     pact.maj_seq_nbr     = sopn.major_seq_nbr     AND
     sopn.sub_ord_nbr     = pact.sub_order_nbr     AND
     sopn.ord_nbr          = oord.ord_nbr          AND
     sopn.sub_ord_nbr     = oord.sub_ord_nbr     AND
          pact.activity_date     >= ?          AND
          sopn.rework_ind          = 'N'          AND
          (oord.part_nbr, sopn.major_seq_nbr, sopn.wctr_id)
          NOT IN     (
                    SELECT     rout.doc_nbr
                    ,     rout.major_seq_nbr
                    ,     rout.wctr_id
                    FROM ROUT rout
                    WHERE     (rout.begn_eff_dt    <=SYSDATE)     AND
                         (rout.end_eff_dt    >SYSDATE)     AND
                         (rout.po_rework_ind    ='N')
GROUP BY     oord.part_nbr
,          sopn.ord_nbr
,          sopn.sub_ord_nbr
,          sopn.major_seq_nbr
,          sopn.wctr_id
,          sopn.oper_desc
,          pact.activity_dateI sent a request off to my IT department (specifically asking for the explain plan and tkprof, as described in the [main post on this topic|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=501834] ), and they replied with a screen shot of the 'explain plan' the tool they use (Toad) provides.
!http://temp-sample.webs.com/explain_plan.jpg!
I don't know if anyone can help me based off this, since I know it's not really what the main post says to provide, but it's all I was given.
My IT department also made a few changes to my original query (see below) and told me it got rid of one of the full scans of the PACT table, but they aren't sure why it helped, and I have to say I'm suspect of any fixes where it's not understood why it helped.
SELECT     oord.part_nbr
,     sopn.ord_nbr
,     sopn.sub_ord_nbr
,     sopn.major_seq_nbr
,     sopn.wctr_id
,     sopn.oper_desc
,     SUM(pact.act_dlrs_earned+pact.act_brdn_dls_earned+pact.tool_dlrs_earned+pact.act_fix_brdn_dls_ea)
,     pact.activity_date
FROM     PACT pact
,     SOPN sopn
,     OORD oord
WHERE     sopn.ord_nbr          = pact.order_nbr     AND
     sopn.major_seq_nbr     = pact.maj_seq_nbr     AND
     pact.sub_order_nbr     = sopn.sub_ord_nbr     AND
     oord.ord_nbr           = sopn.ord_nbr          AND
     oord.sub_ord_nbr     = sopn.sub_ord_nbr     AND
     (pact.activity_date >= ?)               AND
     'N'               = sopn.rework_ind     AND
     pact.order_nbr          = oord.ord_nbr          AND
     oord.sub_ord_nbr = pact.sub_order_nbr          AND
     (oord.part_nbr, pact.maj_seq_nbr, sopn.wctr_id) NOT IN
          SELECT /*+ INDEX_JOIN(ROUT) */     rout.doc_nbr
          ,                    rout.major_seq_nbr
          ,                    rout.wctr_id
          FROM     ROUT rout
          WHERE     rout.begn_eff_dt     <= SYSDATE     AND
               rout.end_eff_dt      > SYSDATE     AND
               'N' = rout.po_rework_ind
GROUP BY     oord.part_nbr
,          sopn.ord_nbr
,          sopn.sub_ord_nbr
,          sopn.major_seq_nbr
,          sopn.wctr_id
,          sopn.oper_desc
,          pact.activity_dateAny help on this would be appreciated... when I run this (right now) for 2-3 months of data, it takes a minimum of 3 hours to complete, and I'll eventually need to run this for up to a year's worth of data.

Hi,
Well, let's see.
You get 156 rows returned using IN and 121 rows using exists.
You need identify the 'missing records' and conclude if that's correct or not, I'm not able to do that from remote, without knowing your data or system.
It would be helpful if we could see cost and cardinalities, you (or your IT dept.) can get them easily be running the queries from your SQL*Plus prompt.
Type
SET AUTOTRACE TRACEONLYbefore running the queries.
That gives you the explain plan and additional statistics (sorts in memory and sorts to disk).
Since you use a group by, and you're on 8i can you also post results of these queries:
select banner from v$version;
select name, value, isdefault from v$parameter where name like '%area%';Finally, does below query give you a different plan?
select oord.part_nbr
,      oord.ord_nbr
,      oord.sub_ord_nbr
,      pact.major_seq_nbr
,      sopn.wctr_id
,      sopn.oper_desc
,      sum(pact.act_dlrs_earned + pact.act_brdn_dls_earned + pact.tool_dlrs_earned + pact.act_fix_brdn_dls_ea)
,      pact.activity_date
from   oord oord
,      pact pact
,      sopn sopn
where oord.ord_nbr       = pact.order_nbr
and    oord.sub_ord_nbr   = pact.sub_order_nbr
and    oord.ord_nbr       = sopn.ord_nbr
and    oord.sub_ord_nbr   = sopn.sub_ord_nbr
and    sopn.major_seq_nbr = pact.maj_seq_nbr
and    (pact.activity_date >= ?)
and    'N' = sopn.rework_ind
and    (oord.part_nbr, pact.maj_seq_nbr, sopn.wctr_id) not in ( select rout.doc_nbr
                                                                ,      rout.major_seq_nbr
                                                                ,      rout.wctr_id
                                                                from   rout rout
                                                                where rout.begn_eff_dt <= sysdate
                                                                and    rout.end_eff_dt > sysdate
                                                                and    'N' = rout.po_rework_ind)
group by oord.part_nbr
,         oord.ord_nbr
,         oord.sub_ord_nbr
,         pact.major_seq_nbr
,         sopn.wctr_id
,         sopn.oper_desc
,         pact.activity_date

Question for ORACLE EXPERTS!!! PERFORMANCE PROBLEM!!!

I have 2 nodes on RAC. On node1 the following query run in 15 seconds and on node2 the same query run in 40 minutes. This is a big problem because we are migrating a SQL Server database to Oracle RAC 10gR2 (10.2.0.2) on HP-UX Itanium and we can´t finish the project because of this performance problem!!! PLEASE HELP ME ORACLE GURUS !!! I have opened a TAR at Metalink a 3 month ago,but they can´t help me with this. Can anyone explain this event to me please??? " gc cr multi block request 92011 0.33 737.49
This is the query that i run on both nodes and this is the tkprof of the trace file when i run this on second node:
select /*+ NO_PARALLEL(t) */ sum(t.saldo_em_real)
from
brcapdb2.titulo t
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 13.76 790.26 0 107219 0 0
total 3 13.76 790.26 0 107219 0 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 31
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 2 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 2 0.02 0.02
gc cr multi block request 92011 0.33 737.49
gc current grant busy 1 0.00 0.00
latch: KCL gc element parent latch 4 0.00 0.00
latch: object queue header operation 17 0.00 0.01
latch free 6 0.00 0.00
gc remaster 9 1.94 9.00
gcs drm freeze in enter server mode 19 1.97 30.52
gc current block 2-way 10 0.61 2.72
SQL*Net break/reset to client 1 0.01 0.01
Please help me if you can!!
Tks,
Paulo.

Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 2 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 2 0.02 0.02
gc cr multi block request 92011 0.33 737.49
gc current grant busy 1 0.00 0.00
latch: KCL gc element parent latch 4 0.00 0.00
latch: object queue header operation 17 0.00 0.01
latch free 6 0.00 0.00
gc remaster 9 1.94 9.00
gcs drm freeze in enter server mode 19 1.97 30.52
gc current block 2-way 10 0.61 2.72
SQL*Net break/reset to client 1 0.01 0.01There's lots of global cache traffic going on. All those multiblock transfers seem to be saturating the interconnect. Some things to consider:
- Have a look at metalink note 3951017.8 for a possible fix
- Check that your interconnect is properly configured
- Try running the query with PARALLEL hint. This would mean doing disk I/O instead of buffer & interconnect I/O.
edit: changed "without NOPARALLEL" to "with PARALLEL"
Message was edited by:
antti.koskinen

** JDBC Receiver - Oracle Stored Procedure - Large Records - Performance

Hi friends,
In my File to JDBC scenario, I use Oracle SP. I designed my target structure as mentioned in help.sap.com. In this scenario, the Sender file sends large no. of records, we have to update those records in the Oracle table. As per this requirement, I did mapping. I tested one file with 4 records. In SXMB_MONI, mapping works fine. I have given below the target payload. The message is processed successfully. (Still I have not created SP in database I am unable to check for the updating of records in the table).
My doubt is
1) Whether the target payload is correct ?
2) For each <STATMENT> tag, Will XI establish connectivity to JDBC and update the record ? If it is, in real time if we send large no. of records, ex: 50 thousand records, performance isssu will come or not?
3) How to solve the problem as said in point 2. (LookUp procedure etc)
Kindly reply friends. (If you have faced this problem ... kindly reply how to solve this issue)
Target Payload:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ns1:PSABCL_Mumbai xmlns:eds="http://sdn.sap.com/sapxsl" xmlns:ns0="http://abc.xyz.com" xmlns:ns1="http://abc.xyz.com/ABCL/Finance">
<STATEMENT>
<SP_ABCL ACTION="EXECUTE">
<IF_ROW_STAT>FOR_IMPORT</IF_ROW_STAT><CON_FST_NAME>John</CON_FST_NAME><CON_LAST_NAME>Test001915</CON_LAST_NAME><CON_MID_NAME>W</CON_MID_NAME>
</SP_ABCL>
</STATEMENT>
<STATEMENT>
<SP_ABCL ACTION="EXECUTE">
<IF_ROW_STAT>FOR_IMPORT</IF_ROW_STAT><CON_FST_NAME>Josephine</CON_FST_NAME><CON_LAST_NAME>Walker</CON_LAST_NAME><CON_MID_NAME>Rose</CON_MID_NAME>
</SP_ABCL>
</STATEMENT>
<STATEMENT>
<SP_ABCL ACTION="EXECUTE">
</SP_ABCL>
</STATEMENT>
<STATEMENT>
<SP_ABCL ACTION="EXECUTE">
</SP_ABCL>
</STATEMENT>
</ns1:PSABCL_Mumbai>
Thanking You.
Kind Regards,
Jegathees P.

Hi,
The structure should be -
<MsgType Name>
<StatementName>
<storedProcedureName action = "EXECUTE">
<table>
<List of Parameters isInput = "true" type = "STRING">
Map the table node to the stored procedure name.
Also,
For each statement, XI would make a database call. For better performance, do not check the button in CC - Open a new connection to database for each message.
Also another solution would be, collect all the data in the mapping to a comma or a pipe separated string in the mapping and have the statement node created only once. This way, though you have 5000 records, they all will be given to the SP in one DB call. you can also manage the mapping so that you will not send more the the X number of records to database in a single call. We are using an XML created in code in an UDF for this. The SP has to take care of stripping the comma or pipe separated values or the XML sent as a string input parameter.
VJ

Does oracle 8i can be able to export and import long raw data?

Hi freinds,
i m trying to export a user schema that includes emp_photo a long raw, it got exported with out errors (oracle 7 doesnt). when im tryuing to import it is getting failed, does it cant be imported? or this is becz of some other problems.
thanks in advance

Hi,
Could you list the error messages that you are getting when you try to do an import.

CE 7.1 Ehp1 SP5 on Oracle 10.2.0.4 Performance - XSS track import of SCAs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for