Change IDoc Split Threshold

Hi,
when I run transaction PFAL with message type HRMD_A and basic type HRMD_A05, I find that new IDocs are created when the number of segments exceed 400. I would like to increase that number. How can I achieve that?
Thanks.
/ Elvez

Hi!
You should have a look at transaction <b>WE20</b> (partner profiles), look for the pp that is used in this IDoc scenario, then double click on output message type, and in tab <b>Outbound Options</b> you should see the value in field <b>Pack. size</b>.
Hope this helps - please reward me if it does.
Regards, Joerg

Similar Messages

Idoc split program

hi,
what is the use of idoc split program.in which scenario it will be used?
Ganesh

Spliting the idoc - suppose you have purchase order - when you create purchase order then it will create one idoc.
some times requirement would be like - purchase order has many line items ,clients need each line item as one idoc ,here we need create multiple idoc for one order ( For this we need to change the logic with in function module)
Reward Points if it is helpful
Thanks
Seshu

Why to use chnage pointers for master data idoc why not the change idoc

Hi Gurus,
I have one doubt about Idoc.
When changes to master data has to be sent Change pointers are configured and used. (CDPOS & CDHDR). In case of the transaction data change change idoc is used as is the case with orders (we use ORDCHG for ORDERS message type to send the chnage details to a order which was already sent to other system.
Why we can't use change idoc or message type whatever, instead of Chnage pointers in case of master data or vice versa in case of transaction data.
Your valuable input will be rewarded with suitable points!!
-B S B.

Hi,
It was a good question ... SAP seems never designed the change pointer to handle transactional data IDocs. Only for master data IDocs distribution purposes.
It may due to volume data ... the transactional data can change many times within a day compare with master data which hardly change or once a while.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Change Document splitting rule

Our company has been live with the new GL and document splitting for 3 years. The original splitting rule was set to split on the Business Area. However we would like to change the rule to split on Profit Center instead of Business Area. Is it possible to change the splitting rules without adversely effecting the system?

Hi Michael,
There is no harm in discontinuing the active rule but activating the inactive rule is really a big deal and SAP doe recommend this because it has potential threat. See below example.
Only Business Area active as Document Splitting rule.
Invoice was posted where there was profit center not populated for some reason and system did not give any error since it was not active field.
Now you activate profit center as document splitting characteristic
You clear the invoice posted above, system will give error like Document Splitting: Item for clearing not found which is irresolvable by the way of confguration change for which data has to be migrated using cockpit and that has to be done under SAP's Consultancy only.
If you want activate Profit Center as a Document Splitting Characteristic then go ahead but do not select it as a Mandatory Field
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

IDoc Split to different IDocs!!!!!!!!URJENT

Hi
Is there any possibility to split the IDoc ?
We have a scenario like - Header without any data - Segments with the data - trailer segment with the details of the segment count and parent idoc details.
We received one Inbound IDoc with 20000 segments.
While processing the IDoc, because of the huge data it is going to dump with low memory issue.
Is there any possiblity to split the segments into seperate idocs...in WE19 we can cut down the segments and create seperate idoc but count is very high we are not able to identify the numbers count.
Is there any other way we can process the IDoc splitting into different IDocs.
VVR
FICO Consultant

Hi Vuppala,
CAn you please help how u split the IDOC.
I have ARTMAS IDOC and as there is huge data i need to split it.
Can you please help
Thanks,
Akriti

Changing IDOC status

Hello
I wander how to change IDOC status. I know there is an report (or a FM) which changes it but I can not find it. Could you please hepl me?
Thank you in advance

Hi,
do you mean with a transaction BD87 ? You can modify the idoc and process it ..
regards,
Sandrine

How to change Self Monitoring Thresholds in SOLMAN 7.1 SP8?

Hello Expert,
I'm wondering if there is an option to change Self Monitoring Thresholds in SOLMAN 7.1 SP8? I'm getting so many SOLMAN Self Monitoring alert's emails, so looking forward to adjust the thresholds (if this is possible at all)?
Your help is always appreciated.
Thanks & regards,
MM

Hi Roland,
Thanks a lot for advice!
Sorry, how are you getting to this screen where you can create a custom template?
Somehow I can't find any option to create a custom template in step 3.2 of the Self-Mon in my system.
When I press 'Configure and Activate' button it's just activating the Self-Mon, without any option to create a custom template.
In Alerting Directory Browser I can see SAP Standard Template for Self-Mon,...
...but I'm struggeling to find where I can create the custom template a copy of this standard one?
Probably I'm missing something.
I'm on SP08.
You help is much appreciated.
Best,
MM

Flags in IDOC for change IDOCs

Hi,
If we have an order or delivery created using the standard create IDOC then how does the changes happen using the another standard change IDOC.
The problem i am facing is as follows:
we have a flat file which maps to create IDOC,
The same flat file maps to change IDOC. the problem is change IDOC has flags which need to be set, and only then the changes happen for the corresponding fields, as we dont know what fields will have changed values XI wont be able to set these flags.
Note: create and change routing conditions are properly identified.
Is there any better solution in XI side or should it be done from the sender side where in they have to set the flags in the sending structure.

Yeah you are right about everything, but the problem here is the changes that come in flat file have all the fields populated irrescpective of whether a field is actually having the change or not.
May be i shouldnt have used the word flag but should have used a ctrl field
and the idoc is such that we have a two segment
lets say we item segment which has qty, vloume , material.....
and there is control item segment which has ctrl qty , ctrl volume, ctrl material.....
so now the case is qty field can be updated if ctrl qty has X in it. its true also for the rest of the fields.
Now the problem is the flat file cant send these X in the ctrl fields. and XI cant put X in all the ctrl fields as if we do it that way its not updating the actual updated fields

Change idoc

Hi,
is it possible to change idoc's? I have a idoc and must add one field -> is it possible?
doese anyone know a transaction or program?
thanks
michael

hello,
some more info...
<b>WE31 - segment editor</b>.
here u can create new segment with some fields or u can even change an existing segment and add new fields.
if u r changing an existing segment u first have to cancel release and then only u can change it.
for this, in WE31,
<b>EDIT -> CANCEL RELEASE</b> now u can add.
after adding new fields you should again do this in WE31
<b>EDIT -> SET RELEASE</b>
if u dont do this u will have problem later.
if u r not adding any new segments u done need to go to WE30.
<b>WE30 : Develop IDoc types</b>
here we attach all segments to make an IDoc type. It can happen that an IDoc type is already existing and u have to add a new segment with some fields. In this case also u should first CANCEL RELEASE and then add.
after adding again SET RELEASE.
hope this helps...
reward if useful....

ORDERS Idoc splitting into two

Hi,
   I have requiremnt where i need to Split Orders idoc into messages.
   1. Orders XML file 2.XML file only with control record fields.
i have seen all the discssion on this and deceiced to implement the scenario as per
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible   blog. But the problem is need to use two message types on the target side.. for splitting the message..
ORDERS and Contrlo record Fields message type... i can't change the standard idoc..
Can i add the Control record fields to Standard IDOC in any way....   like exporting file...if so..
tell me whether the Idoc will split into two messaged or not....
Regards,
Deep

My doubt is in the mentioned blog target msg type was created one.. here i need to take with ORDERS idoc(ED in our case). I need to split the IDOC everytime when it triggers based on RCVPRN field value.. this value is always so there should be 2 values everytime.
you will need to duplicate the IDOC at the target side to achieve this...if you are successful in doing the 0...unbounded thing for your IDOC....
1) Duplicating:
Duplicating is not Multimapping.....Multimapping is what you saw in the blog and duplicating is right-clicking on the node and choosing Duplicate Subtree....no two messages will be created in this process (duplicating).....
2) Multimapping:
it is used to create two (or more) different messages at the target end...
Does it split into two message ( ORDERS XML and Control Record XML)
No it wont split the IDOC into two messages.....
So if your requirement is to have only one target message with seperate IDOC nodes..having ORDERS and Control data individually...then go for duplication method...apply the condition for RCVPRN to generate the nodes...
If your req is to have two different messages at the target then use multimapping apply the condition for RCVPRN to generate the two different messages.....
Hope it helps...
Regards,
Abhishek.

IDoc Split with out BPM using SplitByValue at the LineItem Level

I have an Invoice idoc contains line item and identifier changes into groups, let's say A & B
Using Message Mapping, Will i be able to Split into 2 IDOCs and combine A into one IDOC and B into Another IDOC and send it across to ECC with out using BPM?
Btw the header is commom for both the IDOCs
Source
<Header>
<headertext>headername</headertext>
<lineItem>
<item1>A</item1>
<item2>B</item2>
<item3>A</item3>
<item3>B</item4>
</item>
</lineitem>
</header>
Target
IDOC 1
<Header>
<headertext>headername</headertext>
<lineItem>
<item1>A</item1>
<item2>A</item2>
</item>
</lineitem>
</header>
IDOC 2
<Header>
<headertext>headername</headertext>
<lineItem>
<item1>B</item1>
<item2>B</item2>
</item>
</lineitem>
</header>
Any inputs are appreciated

I actually gave wrong information on the source structure, I am trying to execute scenario with the given examples, meanwhile any help is appreciated
<Header>
               <Date>20100112</Date>
               <Amount>10</Amount>
               <No>20</No>
</Header>
            <InvoiceItem>
               <Line1>10</Line1>
               <Line2>10</Line2>
               <Amount>10</Amount>
               <ActionIndicator>I</ActionIndicator>
            </InvoiceItem>
            <InvoiceItem>
               <Line1>20</Line1>
               <Line2>20</Line2>
               <Amount>20</Amount>
               <ActionIndicator>C</ActionIndicator>
            </InvoiceItem>
            <InvoiceItem>
               <Line1>30</Line1>
               <Line2>30</Line2>
               <Amount>30</Amount>
               <ActionIndicator>I</ActionIndicator>
            </InvoiceItem>
            <InvoiceItem>
               <Line1>40</Line1>
               <Line2>40</Line2>
               <Amount>40</Amount>
               <ActionIndicator>C</ActionIndicator>
            </InvoiceItem>
Target 1
<Header>
               <Date>20100112</Date>
               <Amount>10</Amount>
               <tNo>20</No>
               <ActionIndicator>I</ActionIndicator>
</Header>
               <InvoiceItem>
               <Line1>10</Line1>
               <Line2>10</Line2>
               <Amount>10</Amount>
            </InvoiceItem>
            <InvoiceItem>
               <Line1>30</Line1>
               <Line2>30</Line2>
               <Amount>30</Amount>
            </InvoiceItem>
Target 2
<Header>
               <Date>20100112</Date>
               <Amount>10</Amount>
               <tNo>20</No>
               <ActionIndicator>I</ActionIndicator>
</Header>
               <InvoiceItem>
               <Line1>20</Line1>
               <Line2>20</Line2>
               <Amount>20</Amount>
            </InvoiceItem>
            <InvoiceItem>
               <Line1>40</Line1>
               <Line2>40</Line2>
               <Amount>40</Amount>
            </InvoiceItem>
I know the part of Splitting IDOC, which was executing correctly, with the external data type changes. Please advice

Mapping - Checking 3 fields to change IDOC

Hello,
I am triggering a new IDOC whenever the source field1 changes as below.
field1 -> removecontext -> splitbyvalue [value change] -> collapsecontext -> IDOC
If i need to check for 2 more fields field2 & field3 and if any one of these 3 field changes trigger the creation of new IDOC field?
How do I map the other two fields to IDOC?
Thanks,
Hari

Hi,
Since we can not map the target IDOC when any of the field changes using nodefunctions , you can write UDF and check the same i.e if field1 changes or field2 changes or field3 changes then trigger new IDoc. This is one of the options that you can try...please try it once.
Regards
Priyanka

PO Change IDoc to Vendor

Hello,
I wonder if a SRM expert might help me in locating an appropriate place (BADI?) to insert IDoc generating logic during a PO change. I am in SRM 7.0 and need to send a Purchase Order Change Request (EDI 860) to the vendor via IDoc.
Thank you,
JR

Hi,
I wonder why would you want to do that. Any change to the PO is internal to your organisation till such a PO is ordered(approved). Once ordered you can anyways send the output to you vendor which would inform him of the changes.
Regards
Azad

Purchase order already exists error for change Idoc 860

Hi all
I am getting an error that purchase order number already exists, when i try to post change inbound IDoc 860. How can I fix this issue?
Thanks in advance

This can be b'coz of Check purch.order no is active (A - Check whether the purchase order number already exists) in your sales doc type (TCode VOV8) used for the transaction.
So, if for your business process, one PO number can be mention in more than one sales orders. Then maintain Check purch.order no should mention as <Blank> - No Check under your sales doc type used for transaction's General Control. Or else use diff. PO Number.
Hope this can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Changing IDOC Control Record for EDI inbound Orders Creatiion

Hi,
When I try to process the Inbound orders Idocs file through the GENTRAN EDI System.IDOC's were errored out, because of the Partner function was not defined for the Customer ( Legacy ) ( Type KU ) in the SAP.
Is there any user exit/badi/Configuration to change the Legacy Partner(Customer) to the SAP Partner(Customer) mapping and update the IDOC Control record with the SAP Partner. I am calling EDI_DATA_INCOMING Function module and IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS.IDOCs errored out with Message EO-332 ( Partner function not defined ).
Advance Thanks,
Balaji.

It's been a long time since I have done any IDOC processing.
Go to SE37 and enter the function module IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS. Display the source code. Search for "CALL CUSTOMER". You should see several "CALL CUSTOMER-FUNCTION" lines. These are enhancements where you can manipulate the IDOC data. If you locate the correct one (where the data is read from the IDOC but not yet validated), you should be able to map the partner function value. Double-clicking on the number in quotes will bring you to an "EXIT_" function module. A "ZX" INCLUDE program is referenced. If you haven't used the exit yet, double-clicking on the ZX INCLUDE will create it. The values passed into the function module are available in the INCLUDE.
Ideally, you should create a project in transaction CMOD that references the chosen enhancement. This way you can activate/deactivate without commenting/uncommenting the code in the INCLUDE.

Change IDoc Split Threshold

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for