ChaRM without transport

We'd like to implement ChaRM without transport management yet. But we still need to create transport requests from the UC, so we do need to create a maintenance cycle. Or is there a way to create UCs with transport requests without project and maintenance cycle?
However, upon creation of MC full configuration of the TMS is required! All transports to QAS and PRD are going to be done manually. Do we still need to configure the transport routes?

So, I need to create two consolidation routes for the two layers from DEV to QAS and one delivery route from QAS to PRD ADDITIONALY to the already existing transport routes and this won't be a problem for the existing configuration?
> "Create the consolidation transport routes to SMM:200, transport route must be CLIENT SPECIFIC for the use in Charm scenario, this is real important!"
If I change the transport strategy of the three systems to "client specific", won't this require change of ALL other transport routes that have already been defined for those systems?
> "RFC connections from Solution Manager to DEV, QUA and PRD system, donu2019t forget to create also SM_..._TMW connection to all satellites DEV, QUA and PRD, to clients with customizing, test and production roles, in our example, we will create the RFC connection to 100, 200 and 300. Also to client 000 of all the involved systems, DEV, QUA and PRD systems in our example."
Does this mean I have to have an user in all three systems including in all three 000-clients?

Similar Messages

In BW Reporting what can be done without transport

Hi Experts,
In BW Reporting what can be done without transport. Suppose
RRI, DIS to Nav changes
Please Detail or any documentation.
Thanks

Dear,
You cannot make changes in underlying structure of objects in prod system , the changes shoud always come through a proper tranport layer ( dev -- QA -- prod).
CTS(change and tranport system) is build to manage all changes across system , it takes care of versioning as well.
Usually in production system you can do data loading and other data oriented activities.
If you need to work on object related changes, start from a dev system.
regds
Jay

Move out Info Provider to other server without transport connection?

Hi All,
Could you share you thought ?
Is there a possibility to move out the info provider design & info object to other server without transport connection ?
The background is our project box will be decommissioned, and unfortunately it's not connected to development box. We've already found how to move out ABAP program, we generate it to XML, than upload it.
How about for info provider itself / info Object ? Is there a possibility to have the same treatment ?
Any thought from all of you ?
If you have the way, appreciate if you can share it to me.
Thanks a lot and have a good day,
Best regards,
Daniel N.

Hi,
From transport side, it is possible. You can create a dummy transport target system, then collect BI objects in request and release it. After release, the exported data is in dir_trans, you can manually copy it to realy target server, put them in dir_trans, and in STMS import Q, select from menu of import external request and import it.

Change Request Management without Transport Management

Hello Change Request Management Experts!
I have understood that It is possible to take change request managment in use without transport management. So I could handle Change Request with different statuses without automatic funtions behind these statuies. We like to see how to handle changes between different roles of people and implement the functions after that.
I suppose that I should take only Change Request (approvals) and not Change Documents (execution) from Change Request Management.
Have any of you tried to do that?
Best Regards, Leena Nissilä

Hi Andy,
Thank you for your answer. I have tried to do that also but I where is still some configuration missing because I get error message in: No maintenance cycle is open for the current system. I have also tried to to that maintenance cycle but I thought that it needs CTS activation in some project.
I also like to know what is minimun configuration for change management that I could use SDAD with Service Desk.
I looking forward to you reply,
Br Leena
Edited by: Leena Nissilä on Sep 17, 2008 1:24 PM

Code Inspector Issue - "MODIFY - without TRANSPORTING was found in line "

Hi all
I am new to abap and my transports are unable to move further because of code inspector error
"MODIFY - without TRANSPORTING was found in line ". Help me resolve the issue.
For example
LOOP AT i_user_add.
    i_user_add-mandt = sy-mandt.
    MODIFY i_user_add.
ENDLOOP.
<removed_by_moderator>
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Oct 16, 2008 3:23 PM

Hi ,
       while modifying the internal table specify wich field you are modifying
modify <internal table > from <work area> transporting <fields>.
regards
naveen

Upload of Customs Duty Rates (xml file) without transport request creation

Hi All
Can we upload the Customs Duty Rates (xml file) without transport request directly in the system.
Thanks & Best Regards
Kiran

Hi Kiran,
Please check transaction & program /SAPSLL/TLC_CUSB_UPL in GTS.
This allows you to upload the XML from a local source or an application server path.
I do not think a transport request is required in this scenario.
Best Regards,
Eoin

Charm without Cross system object lock

Dear All,
We have requirement for configuration of Charm without cross system object lock i.e. solution manager will be used for documentation but create, release, import request from the development system itself.
Can we make changes in the functionality and use charm for documentation only?
if anyone has the same requirement can you please let me know steps to be followed.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Sushant

Dear Prabhakar,
Thanks for the reply.
Our project has just gone live and issues immediate resolution is being carried. Charm will integrate with system and training is required for that which at this point of time not possible but at the same time without affecting the issue resolution we want to log the changes in solution manager.
We will use the CSOL feature may be some time later.
At present i have not activate CSOL, still the document doesn't flow through. Document got stuck at "In development" phase and doesn't move forward. It doesn't allow to change the status.
Regards
Sushant

Can Tcode exist in Pre-production and Production without transporting it...

Hi ABAP Guru's,
Can a T-code that has been created in Development system saved in a package be available in Pre-production and Production environment without transporting it.
Apt answers will be rewarded.
Raghav

Hi,
I hope it is not possible in normal scenario. But it is possible if below thing has happend.
eg: U created a transport in development system and assigned to some package/development class.
If some one created another TR and transported the whole package to quality/production then your transaction code will also be tranported but ur TR will not be. This i am not sure. But still....i think this can happen.
Check the above thing if it has happend.
Thanks,
Vinod.

Change Request Management without Transport Managment System

Hello,
we would like to use the Change Request Management but without using the Transport Managment System (TMS). Means, we do not want that transport request are created automatically, we do not want that it is possible to log on to the satellite systems via the Solution Manager and we do not want to integrate the transport track into the Solution Manager.
What effort do we have to estimate for such a change? Does anybody already use a process like this? We would be grateful for any idea or solution.
Many thanks in advance.
Jenny

Hi Jenny,
you can do this with the following activities in your custom Business Transaction (BT):
- remove un-useful actions from your action list (TA: CRMC_ACTION_CONF)
- remove the action from the actions depending on user status (TA: starting from SPRO)
- unlock the switches from your SMI Project CTS Switches (TA: SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN)
The effort, for copying a standard BT and remove the actions and testing it, is about 5 days, if you already know how to customize a ChaRM BT... last but not least if one of the standard flows is what you really need.
Please let me know if you need more details, otherwise please reward the forum points
Regards ,
Giampaolo

ChaRM: Release transport Error

Hi Team,
I have configured ChaRM in my Sol Man system (EHP1, SP24). When i try to release the transport request in Sol Man, i ma getting below error:
Error RFC destination SM_GDDCLNT300_TMW: Screen output without connection to user.
In SM59, both connection test & Authorization test is OK.
Your valuable input will be very much appreciated....
Thanks
Kumar

Hi All,
If i execute this RFC in SM59 (Connection Test & Authorization Test) in Sol Man system, it is OK. But when i try to release the transport request thro Sol MAn using the action "Release Transport Request", i am seeing this error in task list.
How this RFC can fail during transport request release, even it is working SM59?
Need your advise...
Thanks
Kumar

ChaRM - Import Transport Request - Production

Hello Dears,
I have some issues/doubts with my ChaRM process.
- Before the u201CImport Transport Request (Background)u201D on QAS environment, if I change the status to u201CGo Liveu201D in SCMA, I can u201CImport Transport Request (Background)u201D on PRD environment, without any verification in the support message.
Example: If the support message was in u201CTest statusu201D, on SCMA I can import to production environment. Wouldnu2019t have be a check or lock to not allow this action?
- Exist any way to select the requests to import to PRD environment?
Regards to all,
FS
Edited by: Fabio Sato on Jun 15, 2009 7:29 PM

Fabio
you have several options to schedule transports for like every hour
TMS jobs must be scheduled via STMS. To do this:
1) Goto transaction STMS
2) Select 'Overview --> Imports'
3) Double click on the system you wish to schedule the job for
4) Click on the truck icon to schedule an import all job (only import
   all jobs may be scheduled as periodic)
5) Fill in target client, if necessary
6) Select 'At start time' and fill in the date and time
7) Next to 'Period' there is a box with a gray background. If you
   click in the box a drop-down arrow will appear. Click on this.
8) Select your period from the menu options and click on the green
   check.
9) Click on the green check again and your job will be scheduled.
or
you schedule the automatic import of u_rgent corrections via /TMWFLOW/SCMA_BTCH_SYNC_UC
see this link for details
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm40/helpdata/en/96/0737423df2b26be10000000a155106/content.htm
nesimi
Edited by: Nesimi Buelbuel on Jun 18, 2009 11:49 AM

Solution Manager/Charm and Transport Dependency Check

Hello Everyone,
I apologize if this question has an obvious answer. I have searched SDN and could not get a 100% answer.
We are just now in the process of rolling out Charm/Solution Manager and I have noticed that it appears to not perform transport dependency checks. For example, let's say I am working on object ABC and have completed my testing (ready for transport to production) and then another developer also starts development on object ABC. When my change is moved to production, it will pick up the other developers modifications without giving a warning or an error that a dependency has been encountered between the two transport requests.
Does Charm/Solution Manager offer the option of producing a warning should a transport depedency be identified? If so, will someone explain (or point me to the appropriate documentation) how this can be set up?
Best Regards,
Scott

Hi Scott,
ChaRM supports imports from DEV->QAS->PRD by transport by transport requests level not by transport request task level. So don't worry(i.e., You can't import only your change of object ABC to production. It allows to import your change and other user's change of object ABC together to production).
This is how it works(if more than an user works on the same object):
1. Requester creates a support message from satelitte system to report a problem.
2. Service desk employee creates a change document because some changes need to be done on object ABC to correct that reported problem.
3. Change Manager approves the change document. So a normal correction is created automatically.
4. This normal correction is assigned to 2 developers(your scenario) like for an example DVPR1 and DVPR2.
5. DVPR1 creates a transport request and does some changes on object ABC. So a transport task will be created for DVPR1 under that transport request automatically.
6. When DVPR2 tries to do some changes on the same object ABC, a seperate transport task(not a transport request) will be created for DVPR2 under the same transport request because the object ABC is locked under the transport request. So DVPR2 can't create a separate transport request for the same object if any transport request is pending(not released).
7. Now object ABC will have one transport request. That transport request will have 2 transport tasks(1 for DVPR1 and 1 for DVPR2).
8. Each developer relases their transport task only(not transport request) once he/she completes his/her change on the object ABC.
9. DVPR1 or DVPR2 will change the status of normal correction to "Development Completed".
10. Now, IT operator or DVPR1 or DVPR2 can release the transport request. The transport request can be released only if all tasks are released under the same transport request.
(In this example: DVPR1 completed his change and released his transport task. Next DVPR2 completed and released his transport task).
11. Finally IT operator import the transport request to QAS and PRD.
Hope you are clear now. Let me know if you have any doubts.
Regards,
Sanjai

ChaRM: Several Transport layers

Hi!
We would like to implement ChaRM for the 3 tier landscape (DEV:100 --> QAS:200 --> PRD:100) with several transport layers and transport routes:
a) u201CZDEVu201D u2013 Standard transport layer
b) u201CSAPu201D u2013 SAP transport layer
c) u201CYCSTu201D u2013 transport layer for internal customizing
d) u201CZEXTu201D u2013 transport layer for external vendor
The problem we have is that transports within ChaRM are supported in the standard transport layer of each client.
It means that the transport requests of transport layers u201CYCSTu201D and u201CZEXTu201D that are non-standard transport layer will be ignored by CHaRM.
Has some one of you experience with configuration of ChaRM with several transport layers and can give an advice what is the best solution in my case?
Possible solutions:
a) Creation of additional clients in DEV system and assigning them other standard transport layer (e.g. DEV:200 gets u201CYCSTu201D, DEV:300 gets u201CZEXTu201D as standard transport layer)
Then it should be possible to create three maintenance projects:
1) MP1: (DEV:100 --> QAS:200 --> PRD:100) with transport layer u201CZDEVu201D
2) MP2: (DEV:200 --> QAS:200 --> PRD:100) with transport layer u201CYCSTu201D
3) MP3: (DEV:300 --> QAS:200 --> PRD:100) with transport layer u201CZEXTu201D
b) Migration of all the non-standard layers to standard transport layer.
c) Separation of ChaRM and none-ChaRM transport layers (TMS)
It would be great to get some feedback/suggestions/input
Thank you very much indeed!
regards

Hi
Sorry for my ignorance but the Transport/Routes/Layer are releated to the Development Class.. and ChaRM dont take in count this...
At the end you have 3 Development Clients...100/200/300..you need to create 3 project..
thxs
Wence

ChaRM Reporting - Transport Request, Tak and Owner columns not filled

I am using ChaRM reporting functionalities (/TMWFLOW/REPORTING transaction). When I select "display header, project, task list and transport", transport request, task and owner columns are not filled with values.
What is the problem?
Thanks
Antonello

Hi,
1. Is it configurd for ChaRM functionality in your systme landscape.
2. If not, please do the ChaRM configuration using by tcode SPRO.
Regards,
Srini Nookala

ChaRM: Standard transport layer

Hi!
I have one question regarding transport layers for usage of ChaRM.
Which standard transport layer does the ChaRM need?
a) "SAP" transport layer
2) standard transport layer "ZDEV"
What will happen when one of this (SAP or ZDEV) will be mised or used outside of ChaRM?
Thank you very much!
regards
Thom

Thom Heinemann wrote:>
>
> Which standard transport layer does the ChaRM need?
> a) "SAP" transport layer
> b) standard transport layer "ZDEV"
Anand: ZDEV should be the standard transport layer......
All SAP standard objects will only follow SAP transport layer......irrespective of whatever standard layer is mentioned.....
> What will happen when one of this (SAP or ZDEV) will be mised or used outside of ChaRM?
Anand: Little more clarity is desired on this query....can you please be more specfic about what you meant..
Inspire ppl by rewwarding !!
Regards,
Anand....

ChaRM without transport

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for