Check in Standard USer decsion step before Approval

Hi ,
I am using a standard SAP User desion task I have requirment from the user that the user should not APProve or reject without putting a note as attachement .
how can I achieve the same ?
do we have any user exits on the standard user decsion step or in methods option I also find Secondary methods call do anyone have an idea what this is for ?
Regards
Abhilash
Edited by: Abhilas Stanly on Mar 18, 2009 11:22 AM
Edited by: Abhilas Stanly on Mar 18, 2009 11:22 AM

Hi,
Below the approve & Reject branch of the User decision call the std. Task TS20000139 and give the neccessary binding.
While the approver approves or reject this will open as a popup and they have to the enter the comments. This can be sent to email and also mail to SAP Inbox.
Regards,
Surjith

Similar Messages

Ways to check if AD user already exist before creating a new AD user

Hi all,
I need to import users into a new active directory domain. I will make an extract from the old active directory domain.
The thought process on paper is something like
import csv with data from source AD
For each entry check to see if there already is a user account in the target AD
If there is do nothing and move on to the next entry
If no user is found in the target AD, then create a new user using new-aduser cmdlet
output to console or log file (not decided yet)
I would especially like to get an idea on how to do step 3 and 4. I am thinking something like if else statement.
Regards

That is what I had originally but because he doesn't want to do anything if they do exist, so I figured rather then doing an if/else, just do an if, but you are correct, it does not work that way.....I tend to mix C# programming and powershell
scripting
If you find that my post has answered your question, please mark it as the answer. If you find my post to be helpful in anyway, please click vote as helpful.
Don't Retire Technet
PowerShell is finicky with -not and ! it is also hard for some people tosee and we don't normally think in negative logic. A positive assertion is best even when testing for the negative. It is clearer and avoids fall-through.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

User decision step execution from UWL

Hi,
 I copied the standard user decision step and added my own text in that task. My requirement is i have to execute that step from UWL . i need to configure this task in SWFVISU, so that it will appear in UWL. My question is what are the parameters i need to maintain in swfvisu TXn . because this is not a webdynpro application or Bsp Application.

Please check this SAP help [document|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/44/b7047434d91578e10000000a114a6b/content.htm]
In SWFVISU the two mandatory parameters that you need to consider are
APPLICATION -
> <application name>
PAGE_ID -
> page1.htm/ default.htm.
<ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.TS<XXXXXXXX>.SAP_ECC" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="DefaultView" defaultAction="launchBSP" executionMode="default">
 <ItemTypeCriteria systemId="SAP_ECC" externalType="<XXXXXXXX>." connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
 <Actions>
 <Action name="launchBSP" groupAction="" handler="SAPBSPLauncher" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="yes" launchNewWindowFeatures="resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes,toolbar=no,menubar=no,location=no,directories=no">
 <Properties>
 <Property name="CustomerNamespace" value="sap"/>
 <Property name="Namespace" value="sap"/>
 <Property name="Application" value="<app_name>"/>
 <Property name="PageId" value="page1.htm"/> " case senitive
 <Property name="System" value="${item.systemId}"/>
 <Property name="display_order_priority" value="5"/>
 </Properties>
 <Descriptions default=""/>
 </Action>
 </Actions>
 </ItemType>

User Decission Step

Hi,
I create a user decission step to approve or reject changes at it0008. workflow has to wait for four hours for approvers decission. if approver didnt take any action, the mail has to go to manager to do the same. for this, i have set time at latest end at user decission step, even though mail is not going to manager. still its waiting only at 1st level only.
what might b the problem.
]how to solve this.
thanks in advance,
regards,
venkat

Hi,
First you need to user the modeled option in the latest end tab.
Therefore a branch will be created where you can add the mail step.
Please run report RSWWDHEX to make the deline effective.
You can also make a periodic background job with report with this report.
You can also check the Tocde SWWA to maintain WI Deadline Monitoring.
Thanks and regards,
SNJY

Risk Analysis mandatory before approvation?

Referring to this discussion: How to switch on mandatory risk analysis in Business Role Management?
I'd like to propose another scenario.
Now Risk Analysis is before profile generation and it is correct in this way.
But also Risk Analysis must be mandatory in that step (before approvation) and NOT ONLY during profile generation.
Is it possible to setup a "specific" configuration in this way?
Thanks.
Ettore

Hi Ettore,
you need to Create deterrent Methodology.in Access Control > Role Management> Define Methodology Process and Steps >
Example Methodology 1 for only steps sequence 1,3,4,5 (With Risk Analysis) and
other Methodology 2 for only steps 1,2,3,5 (Without Risk Analysis)
Now Assign those Methodology in Access Control > Role Management> Associate Methodology Process to condition Group.
Now call those condition group name from BRF+ decision table.
Thanks, Arif

Are some standard guidelines/steps to follow before approving Transports?

Hi,
can you help to with steps and procedures that needs to be followed before approving objects to be transported to Productions?
Are some standard guidelines i.e steps to follow before approving Transports?
Or, just the fact that a solution to a problem has been established in the Development and tested in the Test environment, it is ready to be moved to Production?
Thanks

on your point 4:
. . be sure that other requests/tasks are not locking these objects.
I believe if other requests are locking the objects then you probably cant even add those objects to your transport, isnt it?
Yes .you are correct.
also you noted that
: . Whenever you put objects in your task, lock them
Isnt this done automatically by the system? If so then provide how to do that (with tcodes please)
Yes added objects are locked automatically.
To lock them manulally(if necessary), right click on TR-->Lock Objects.
Here is an example whre you have to unlock and lock objects amnuallay..
Leats assume your Objects are already collected in one TR1.
Now you have acreated a new TR2 and want to transport only few objects from TR1.
Then go to Transaction SE03>unlock Objects>Provide TR1--> execute(ignore the warning message).
Then Collect the required objects in TR2 and release it.
Now you have to lock the Objects on TR1. from context menu of TR1-->lock the Objects...
makesure inbetween nobody changes the unlocked Objects otherwise it will cause in consistencies..
you can also unlock required Objects manually but it's time consuming process...
Message was edited by:
Murali

Did the user open the document before approving it? How to log this in workflow logs?

Hi there,
My workflow on Document Library needs to keep logs of:
- When a user is assigned the document for approval/rejection, did he actually open it or download it before approving?
How to get this information please in workflow logs please? (I know this information exists in SharePoint Audit logs but that does not work for me - I need this in workflow logs).
Thanks.

If you are looking for event logs for Document open/edit you can use "Audit Logs". For more information check these links:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/3217c715-3ba7-4925-a18e-d7b01ceee71b/-is-it-possible-to-set-alert-on-open-document-event?forum=sharepointadminprevious
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/9315/view-document-event-for-document-library
***If my post is answer for your query please mark as answer***
***If my answer is helpful please vote***

Run step before workflow ends by user

Good day! I need to clear some fields in entity with workflow status.
Is there an opportunity to run custom step in Designer before workflow is terminated by user?

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you want to run step before workflow ends by user.
In the Workflow, the actions are runing step by step.
To clear some fields in workflow, you can create a workflow variable containing a single space character and use the Trim function to blank the variable.
For more information, you can refer to:
http://officepowerups.com/2014/01/28/how-to-blank-a-text-field-with-a-workflow/
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

I can't seem to get Firefox to open links in Thunderbird, for ex. and when checking defauts, it doesn't show up in my standard user profile (Win7)

I've tried a few browsers, but want to go back to only Firefox as default browser. I can find it and allocate it in the Administrator profile, but not my daily use, standard user. It doesn't even appear in the list of programs to assign defaults.
And when I click on a web link (in Thunderbird, for ex.) I have to copy and paste it in Firefox to go to the page.

This - https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-make-web-links-open-firefox-default - didn't work?

Is it possible to check if a user has a device font before using it?

It's all in the title really. I was hoping there might be a way to check if the user had a certain font already installed on there computer to try and save loading the font at runtime when not needed. Is this possible with Flex4 and the new TLF?
Thanks
Ollie

Font.enumerateFonts(true); will give you an array of device and embedded fonts.

User exit to check the consistency of filled fields before saving

Hi,
I am looking for a User Exit which can be executed when a user click on "Save" button.
In this User Exit, I would like to implement some controls to check the consistency of filled fields.
I have an example to better understand : I work on transaction code ME11 and ME12 (create and modify Info Record). When all mandatory fields are filled, the user can save its. When the user click on "Save" button, I want that a checking (with a user exit, or anything else) verify the consistency of some fields (for example, the consistency between the Tax code of the country and the country of the supplier).
If it's not clear, I could precise...
Thanks in advance for you help...

Hi,
I am looking for a User Exit which can be executed when a user click on "Save" button.
In this User Exit, I would like to implement some controls to check the consistency of filled fields.
I have an example to better understand : I work on transaction code ME11 and ME12 (create and modify Info Record). When all mandatory fields are filled, the user can save its. When the user click on "Save" button, I want that a checking (with a user exit, or anything else) verify the consistency of some fields (for example, the consistency between the Tax code of the country and the country of the supplier).
If it's not clear, I could precise...
Thanks in advance for you help...

Tcode in user decision step

Dear experts,
I have a user decision step. Before the approver can approve or reject the workitem i need to show a tocde screen to him. Say for example CN25. My workitem will be generated only after initiator makes changes in that tcode. I want approver who gets the workitem to see CN25 tcode screen and then only make decision. Is there any possibility to attach or bring a tcode screen in user decision step.

Dear Hemalatha,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
You can direct;y use the Object which is used to trigger the workflow. Then you can bind this object to get that tcode as
attachment in decision task.
This is exactly my requirement. In my BO i have a standard method "display" to display the Tcode. I want to know how should i do the binding from BO's method to user decision task so that i can display a link as attachment of user decision step, by clicking which user can see the display screen.

What is/are the diagram just one step before coding?

My question above is quite clear. I would like to know what is/are the diagram (in UML) one step before coding?
The sequence diagram for coding, does it need to include details? i mean detail here is implementation detal. For example, if my GUI is using swing JTree, do i need to draw the method called from JTree model and JTree itself (all those standard method between them)?

My take on it is this.
UML is a language for communication and clarification of ideas (a few chapters of the UML User Guide by Booch, et al should convince you of that).
All too often I see the language used at too great a level of ceremony, probably owing to the option to export and import source into the model. As a result, many people seem to think that every detail must be modelled in UML prior to export.
My approach, which may not be right for you, is to clarify my approach with UML, such that it can be communicated properly to others. Then export a code framework from the existing model (not just one diagram). Then implement the methods, and add the trivial fields, methods and classes that support the design inherent in the model.
My key check here is to balance quality versus speed. UML should enable the process of software development, and not be another barrier to it.
/k1

ESS deleting an Absence request before approving it.

Hello,
I have problems stopping the ESS Absence Request workflow after the user deletes it before the manager approves.
Reproduction scenario:
- The requestor creates an Absence request.
... the workflow (a copy of WS12300111) is instantiated
... the manager of the requestor gets a work item
Now the requestor decides to delete the absence request...
- Requestor deletes the absence request.
The user now gets the information message:
... the ESS application now tries to complete (FM: SAP_WAPI_WORKITEM_COMPLETE) the Work item of the manager.
No administrator found for the task
(By debugging, I found out that this was message 5W 141.)
The result is that the request document is ended with status WITHDRAWN, which is correct, however the workflow has still a READY work item for the manager which he cannot start anymore.
Analysis:
The error message is a little bit weird, because it actually ment that the requestor is not an agent for the work item of the manager.
I could solve this problem by giving the requestors more authorization. When I added SAP_ALL to the requestor, the error does not occur.
The transition table determines:
Documentstatus: SENT
Status transition: DELETE
Workflow control: CONTINUE Continue Workflow
...that's why it start FM: SAP_WAPI_WORKITEM_COMPLETE
I hope you have an answer to my problem.
Kind regards,
Alwin van de Put
(I expected that ESS would make use of events for terminating work items in stead of using SAP_WAPI_WORKITEM_COMPLETE.)

Hello Ravi,
Thank you for answering.
The standard task is a General Task.
The main problem is, that the agent determined in the step (in my case: Expression: &AGENT_0001.AGENTS&) is not the one who will complete the task.
This is the case when the Requester deletes (withdraw) the absence request, than the ESS function module tries to complete the work item of the Manager with the user of the Requester.
We could solve this problem by giving all requesters the following rights:
S_CODE id TCD field SWIA.
But we don't want to give all users rights to transaction SWIA.
Kind regards,
Alwin.

Sending Email Notification to User's of PO Approval Workfow .

Hi ,
I have copied the standard Workflow template for PO Approval Workflow from WS20000075 to Customized one.
Standard Behaviour :
According to SPRO COnfiguration , agents are picked according to REL Strategy and corresponding Rel code.
For Eg : if REL Strategy = 1 and Associated Release Code is from 1 2 3 4 5 then it is 5 level approval.
all the setting are done correct .i am using default rule for agent determination i.e 20000027. which is working correct.
My requirement is before sending the Workitem to SAP Inbox for release , Email notification should be send to approver
for Eg : if Rel Strategy = 1 and Rel code = 1 then listed user should get Email Notification to his outlook about the PO, once he releases it , next User should recieve the Email Notification till all the Overall release.
*Scot settings are maintained .
i have tried diferent ways to find the solution but dint suceed in finding the solution , neither was able to find the solution for this case in SDN threads .
Request you to share your knowledge . Points are guaranteed.
Thanks in Advance
chitis

Hello,
"I just want to send the Subject line as the Notification to the Email Id and not the workitem from SAP , workitem needs to be executed from Inbox .can it be achieved ?"
The subject line will be: "you have new workitems in your inbox". Simple and to the point. The text of the workitem will be in the contents of the email. If you want anything fancier then you will have to add a sendmail step to every decision step in every workflow. Not worth it.
"Secondly , do i need to maintain the Email ID of the user in SU01 for this?"
Yes, that's where it reads the email address. It has to get it from somewhere.
"What all the prerequisites for this config ?"
Search for Extended Notifications in this forum.
regards
Rick Bakker
hanabi technology

Check in Standard USer decsion step before Approval

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for