ChnEnvelopes gives error "Target Channel is too short for results"

I have 3 channels (1-3) of data loaded, 1 is time, the other 2 are data channels. I am trying to run ChnEnvelopes from within VBS with this command.
call ChnEnvelopes(1,2,4,5,6,7,5)
The size of the original data is 34127.
If I use the dialog it works fine.

Hi,
When you perform calculations in DIAdem, the results will be stored in a channel in the data matrix. When you load a data file, it will occupy a channel for each data channel in the file. If the data channels in the file are longer than the maximum channel length selected in the DIAdem settings, DIAdem will use 'dynamic' channels versus the channels you have configured in the settings menu.
There are two things you can do:
1. Go to the 'Window' menu in DIAdem and select 'Close all'.
2. Then select the 'Settings' menu and choose 'Data management'.
3. Click the 'Data Matrix' button and set the maximum channel length to something larger then your channel length (i.e. >= 34,127). The default value here is 8,192.
Another way to do this is to use dyn
amic channels for the calculation, i.e. use this command:
call ChnEnvelopes(1,2,,,,,5)
Altough the result channels are shorter than 34,127, the software will use these channels for some temporary data storage.
This should hopefully work for you. Let me know if you have any additional problems or questions.
Otmar
Otmar D. Foehner
Business Development Manager
DIAdem and Test Data Management
National Instruments
Austin, TX - USA
"For an optimist the glass is half full, for a pessimist it's half empty, and for an engineer is twice bigger than necessary."

Similar Messages

  • Channel length too short for calculation

    I've just switched from 9.1 to 2010 and I was told that our VBS scripts wouldn't need updating - not so it seems.
    I have the following piece of code:
    Call ChnAlloc("Input PSD") 
    L1=Cno("RealPart")
    L2=Cno("ImaginaryPart")
    Call FormulaCalc("Ch('Input PSD'):=Ch(L1)^2+Ch(L2)^2")
    but this doesn't work anymore. I get an error message saying that channel 7 (Input PSD) is too short for calculation. Previously I would have checked the data matrix but I can't find this anymore so I assume DIAdem works in a different way know. The help files suggest that the channel length option for ChnAlloc is optional so I don't understand why it thinks the channel is too short.
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks, Si.

    Hi SI,
    You only need a minor addition, and you get the benefit that all new channels can have their length(s) dynamically changed.  Please add this line of code after creating the channel and before the FormulaCalc() command:
    ChnLength("Input PSD") = NeededNumberOfRows
    Back in the dark days of the DIAdem memory matrix, DIAdem would by default launch with 60 static channels of exactly 8196 rows each.  As you apparently know, you could customize the memory matrix to have fewer or more channels, and you could change their static lengths assigned when DIAdem launched.  The fully dynamic channel lengths are a vast improvement, but it does mean that for FormulaCalc() commands you need to tell the channel to be big enough first.  Interestingly, none of the ANALYSIS commands require you to do explicitly set the channel length before writing to them-- just the channel calculator.
    Ask if you have any further trouble,
    Brad Turpin
    DIAdem Product Support Engineer
    National Instruments

  • UC560 CUE not working--gives error "your recording is too short, record a longer message"

    I have a UC560 running Unity Express 8.0.3 that is having voicemail issues. After a CUE reload, if a call goes to voicemail the caller gets a message saying "your recording is too short, record a longer message"; at this moment, an error shows up in the CUE session saying "localhost postgres: voicemail aesop [local] idle in transaction:   CRASH sql sql sql PANIC:  failed to add item to the right sibling for "pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index".  After this error appears, any calls forwarded to voicemail just ring until they eventually disconnect.
    I have confirmed that we are not exceeding maximum storage.
    Is this a corrupt database? Would resetting the CUE to factory defaults help?

    Hi Mike,
    Was your issue solved? as I am facing same issue.
    Please share your solution with me.
    Thanks. 

  • Time Machine Error - The backup is too large for the backup disk

    I have been using Lion (currently 10.7.1) on my MacBook Pro (13" - early 2011) since it was released.  I haven't had any serious problems with it.
    All of a sudden, I am getting an error in Time Machine.  When it tries to run a backup, the error "This backup is too large for the backup disk.  The backup requires 7.51 GB but only 630.1 GB are available."  What gives?  That's plenty of room.  I have installed Logic Studio and a few plug-ins, so the 7.51 GB is probably right.  The free space is correct as well.  I can't understand what the problem is.
    The backup disk is an external USB 2.0 drive with no other Time Machine backups on it or any other files.  The folder "Backups.backupdb" is the only thing on the root of the disk.
    I am reluctant to reset the Time Machine and lose all of the backups, but I will if anyone recommends it.

    Hi Linc,
    It is not working at the moment, as I have restored the original Lion image again; it has all my work and apps on it.
    Many thanks for the info on the log, though.  It tells a strange story.  Here's the log from the last backup that worked to the first one that failed: --
    Sep 12 17:15:55 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[674]: Starting standard backup
    Sep 12 17:15:55 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[674]: Backing up to: /Volumes/Backup/Backups.backupdb
    Sep 12 17:15:55 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[674]: 100.0 MB required (including padding), 633.72 GB available
    Sep 12 17:15:55 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[674]: Waiting for index to be ready (100)
    Sep 12 17:16:00 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[674]: Copied 793 files (601 KB) from volume System.
    Sep 12 17:16:00 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[674]: 100.0 MB required (including padding), 633.72 GB available
    Sep 12 17:16:01 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[674]: Copied 89 files (93 bytes) from volume System.
    Sep 12 17:16:01 Johns-MacBook-Pro mds[34]: (Error) Volume: Could not find requested backup type:2 for volume
    Sep 12 17:16:01 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[674]: Starting post-backup thinning
    Sep 12 17:16:01 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[674]: Deleted /Volumes/Backup/Backups.backupdb/John’s MacBook Pro/2011-09-11-154229 (1.1 MB)
    Sep 12 17:16:01 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[674]: Post-back up thinning complete: 1 expired backups removed
    Sep 12 17:16:01 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[674]: Backup completed successfully.
    Sep 13 10:34:12 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[287]: Starting standard backup
    Sep 13 10:34:12 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[287]: Backing up to: /Volumes/Backup/Backups.backupdb
    Sep 13 10:34:52 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[287]: 7.51 GB required (including padding), 630.11 GB available
    Sep 13 10:34:52 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[287]: No expired backups exist - deleting oldest backups to make room
    Sep 13 10:34:52 Johns-MacBook-Pro mds[32]: (Error) Volume: Could not find requested backup type:2 for volume
    Sep 13 10:35:03 Johns-MacBook-Pro com.apple.backupd[287]: Backup failed with error: Not enough available disk space on the target volume.
    I don't understand.  For starters, I think it's a little wasteful that 3.5 GB has been used to back up 601 KB.  That's the difference in free space on the backup volume between the two backups.  That can't be normal, surely.
    The only error is that mds[32] error, and from what I've read on forums, that seems to appear on backups that work perfectly.
    Too weird.  It looks like I'll have to reinstall Lion and all my applications again to get Time Machine working, or find another backup solution.

  • SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column

    Hi,
    I'm trying to understand the above error. It occurs when we are migrating data from one oracle database to another:
    Error report:
    SQL Error: ORA-12899: value too large for column "USER_XYZ"."TAB_XYZ"."COL_XYZ" (actual: 10, maximum: 8)
    12899. 00000 - "value too large for column %s (actual: %s, maximum: %s)"
    *Cause:    An attempt was made to insert or update a column with a value
    which is too wide for the width of the destination column.
    The name of the column is given, along with the actual width
    of the value, and the maximum allowed width of the column.
    Note that widths are reported in characters if character length
    semantics are in effect for the column, otherwise widths are
    reported in bytes.
    *Action:   Examine the SQL statement for correctness.  Check source
    and destination column data types.
    Either make the destination column wider, or use a subset
    of the source column (i.e. use substring).
    The source database runs - Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
    The target database runs - Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
    The source and target table are identical and the column definitions are exactly the same. The column we get the error on is of CHAR(8). To migrate the data we use either a dblink or oracle datapump, both result in the same error. The data in the column is a fixed length string of 8 characters.
    To resolve the error the column "COL_XYZ" gets widened by:
    alter table TAB_XYZ modify (COL_XYZ varchar2(10));
    -alter table TAB_XYZ succeeded.
    We now move the data from the source into the target table without problem and then run:
    select max(length(COL_XYZ)) from TAB_XYZ;
    -8
    So the maximal string length for this column is 8 characters. To reduce the column width back to its original 8, we then run:
    alter table TAB_XYZ modify (COL_XYZ varchar2(8));
    -Error report:
    SQL Error: ORA-01441: cannot decrease column length because some value is too big
    01441. 00000 - "cannot decrease column length because some value is too big"
    *Cause:   
    *Action:
    So we leave the column width at 10, but the curious thing is - once we have the data in the target table, we can then truncate the same table at source (ie. get rid of all the data) and move the data back in the original table (with COL_XYZ set at CHAR(8)) - without any issue.
    My guess the error has something to do with the storage on the target database, but I would like to understand why. If anybody has an idea or suggestion what to look for - much appreciated.
    Cheers.

    843217 wrote:
    Note that widths are reported in characters if character length
    semantics are in effect for the column, otherwise widths are
    reported in bytes.You are looking at character lengths vs byte lengths.
    The data in the column is a fixed length string of 8 characters.
    select max(length(COL_XYZ)) from TAB_XYZ;
    -8
    So the maximal string length for this column is 8 characters. To reduce the column width back to its original 8, we then run:
    alter table TAB_XYZ modify (COL_XYZ varchar2(8));varchar2(8 byte) or varchar2(8 char)?
    Use SQL Reference for datatype specification, length function, etc.
    For more info, reference {forum:id=50} forum on the topic. And of course, the Globalization support guide.

  • Replicat error: ORA-12899: value too large for column ...

    Hi,
    In our system Source and Target are on the same physical server and in the same Oracle instance. Just different schemes.
    Tables on the target were created as 'create table ... as select * from ... source_table', so they have a similar structure. Table names are also similar.
    I started replicat, it worked fine for several hours, but when I inserted Chinese symbols into the source table I got an error:
    WARNING OGG-00869 Oracle GoldenGate Delivery for Oracle, OGGEX1.prm: OCI Error ORA-12899: value too large for column "MY_TARGET_SCHEMA"."TABLE1"."*FIRSTNAME*" (actual: 93, maximum: 40) (status = 12899), SQL <INSERT INTO "MY_TARGET_SCHEMA"."TABLE1" ("USERID","USERNAME","FIRSTNAME","LASTNAME",....>.
    FIRSTNAME is Varchar2(40 char) field.
    I suppose the problem probably is our database is running with NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS='CHAR'
    I've double checked tables structure on the target - it's identical with the source.
    I also tried to manually insert this record into the target table using 'insert into ... select * from ... ' statement - it works. The problem seems to be in the replicat.
    How to fix this error?
    Thanks in advance!
    Oracle GoldenGate version: 11.1.1.1
    Oracle Database version: 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
    NLS_LANG: AMERICAN_AMERICA.AL32UTF8
    NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS='CHAR'
    Edited by: DeniK on Jun 20, 2012 11:49 PM
    Edited by: DeniK on Jun 23, 2012 12:05 PM
    Edited by: DeniK on Jun 25, 2012 1:55 PM

    I've created the definition files and compared them. They are absolutely identical, apart from source and target schema names:
    Source definition file:
    Definition for table MY_SOURCE_SCHEMA.TABLE1
    Record length: 1632
    Syskey: 0
    Columns: 30
    USERID 134 11 0 0 0 1 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
    USERNAME 64 80 12 0 0 1 0 80 80 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    FIRSTNAME 64 160 98 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    LASTNAME 64 160 264 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    PASSWORD 64 160 430 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    TITLE 64 160 596 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    Target definition file:
    Definition for table MY_TAEGET_SCHEMA.TABLE1
    Record length: 1632
    Syskey: 0
    Columns: 30
    USERID 134 11 0 0 0 1 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3
    USERNAME 64 80 12 0 0 1 0 80 80 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    FIRSTNAME 64 160 98 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    LASTNAME 64 160 264 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    PASSWORD 64 160 430 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    TITLE 64 160 596 0 0 1 0 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
    Edited by: DeniK on Jun 25, 2012 1:56 PM
    Edited by: DeniK on Jun 25, 2012 1:57 PM

  • File_To_RT data truncation ODI error ORA-12899: value too large for colum

    Hi,
    Could you please provide me some idea so that I can truncate the source data grater than max length before inserting into target table.
    Prtoblem details:-
    For my scenario read data from source .txt file and insert the data into target table.suppose source file data length exceeds max col length of the target table.Then How will I truncate the data so that data migration will be successful and also can avoid the ODI error " ORA-12899: value too large for column".
    Thanks
    Anindya

    Bhabani wrote:
    In which step you are getting this error ? If its loading step then try increasing the length for that column from datastore and use substr in the mapping expression.Hi Bhabani,
    You are right.It is for Loading SrcSet0 Load data.I have increased the column length for target table data store
    and then apply the substring function but it results the same.
    If you wanted to say to increase the length for source file data store then please tell me which length ?Physical length or
    logical length?
    Thanks
    Anindya

  • I am getting error "ORA-12899: value too large for column".

    I am getting error "ORA-12899: value too large for column" after upgrading to 10.2.0.4.0
    Field is updating only through trigger with hard coded value.
    This happens randomly not everytime.
    select * from v$version
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    CORE     10.2.0.4.0     Production
    TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    Table Structure
    desc customer
    Name Null? Type
    CTRY_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(3 Byte)
    CO_CODE NOT NULL CHAR(3 Byte)
    CUST_NBR NOT NULL NUMBER(10)
    CUST_NAME CHAR(40 Byte)
    RECORD_STATUS CHAR(1 Byte)
    Trigger on the table
    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER CUST_INSUPD
    BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE
    ON CUSTOMER FOR EACH ROW
    BEGIN
    IF INSERTING THEN
    :NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'I';
    ELSIF UPDATING THEN
    :NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'U';
    END IF;
    END;
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01001: invalid cursor
    ORA-06512: at "UPDATE_CUSTOMER", line 1320
    ORA-12899: value too large for column "CUSTOMER"."RECORD_STATUS" (actual: 3,
    maximum: 1)
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    Edited by: user4211491 on Nov 25, 2009 9:30 PM
    Edited by: user4211491 on Nov 25, 2009 9:32 PM

    SQL> create table customer(
      2  CTRY_CODE  CHAR(3 Byte) not null,
      3  CO_CODE  CHAR(3 Byte) not null,
      4  CUST_NBR NUMBER(10) not null,
      5  CUST_NAME CHAR(40 Byte) ,
      6  RECORD_STATUS CHAR(1 Byte)
      7  );
    Table created.
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER CUST_INSUPD
      2  BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE
      3  ON CUSTOMER FOR EACH ROW
      4  BEGIN
      5  IF INSERTING THEN
      6  :NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'I';
      7  ELSIF UPDATING THEN
      8  :NEW.RECORD_STATUS := 'U';
      9  END IF;
    10  END;
    11  /
    Trigger created.
    SQL> insert into customer(CTRY_CODE,CO_CODE,CUST_NBR,CUST_NAME,RECORD_STATUS)
      2                values('12','13','1','Mahesh Kaila','UPD');
                  values('12','13','1','Mahesh Kaila','UPD')
    ERROR at line 2:
    ORA-12899: value too large for column "HPVPPM"."CUSTOMER"."RECORD_STATUS"
    (actual: 3, maximum: 1)
    SQL> insert into customer(CTRY_CODE,CO_CODE,CUST_NBR,CUST_NAME)
      2                values('12','13','1','Mahesh Kaila');
    1 row created.
    SQL> set linesize 200
    SQL> select * from customer;
    CTR CO_   CUST_NBR CUST_NAME                                R
    12  13           1 Mahesh Kaila                             I
    SQL> update customer set cust_name='tst';
    1 row updated.
    SQL> select * from customer;
    CTR CO_   CUST_NBR CUST_NAME                                R
    12  13           1 tst                                      Urecheck your code once again..somewhere you are using record_status column for insertion or updation.
    Ravi Kumar

  • Apple Watch band is too short for me

    I've checked out size of band for Apple Watch and all of these model are too short for me. Even Classic Buckle that is the longest type of band in all family is still not fit. My wrist size is 230mm. Feel so sad...... Hope Apple will made longer band size in the next gen.

    Let me try this again. (This is for a stainless 38).
    I saw the specs on the band. I tried to use a tape measure to determine if it would fit, and I should have had help as that is hard to do alone. But is seemed alright, and I ordered the watch.
    I am a watch junkie. I have never had a problem like this. You come to expect a certain "standard" when you buy a watch, and ALL of my watches have a longer
    strap, and I guess (Shame on me) I assumed so would the Apple Watch.
    The band fits, so to speak, but the part that is left after you pass it though the buckle, is not long enough, and the band keeper-loop thingey does not have enough band to keep it in place. Therefore you are constantly having to slide the loop back over it to keep it in place.
    I could send it back, but you might imagine how I feel about that. I made sure I got mine on the 24th because I stayed up and ordered it right after midnight on the 10th. I really wanted the watch.

  • Time Machine Error.  Backup is too large for the backup disk.  Backup requires 289.28 GB but only 177.01 GB are available.

    My Mac has not been backing up for some time.  Tried Apple Support, but couldn't figure out problem.
    Receive the following error...
    Time Machine Error
    This backup is too large for the backup disk. The backup requires 289.28 GB but only 177.03 GB are available.

    See #C4 in Time Machine - Troubleshooting.
    If that doesn't clarify the situation, post back with:
    How much data is on your internal HD (and any others being backed-up)?
    How large is your Time Capsule?
    Is there anything else on the TC besides these backups?  If so, what and how large?

  • Time Machine Error This backup is too large for the backup disk

    Hi, I have a 1TB Time Capsule which backs up my Mac. I was having some issues with my mac so I decided to perform an erase and install and then use Migration Assistant to transfer everything back to my Mac.
    After I reinstalled Snow Leopard and restored my Mac using Migration Assistant, Time Machine says that the backup has failed. It says " Time Machine Error This backup is too large for the backup disk. The Backup requires 663 GB but only 255 GB are available.
    What do I do? Is my only option to erase my Time Capsule and have it back everything up from scratch?

    Hi, thanks for the help. I erased everything off of the Time Capsule and it's backing up my Mac from scratch. It's almost finished backing up my whole mac. It's now at 641.86gb of 646.54gb but it's now backing up very slowly. It's backing up .1 every few minutes. Is this normal?
    Here's the log from Time Machine Buddy:
    Starting standard backup
    Attempting to mount network destination using URL: afp://Stuart%[email protected]/Time%20Capsule
    Mounted network destination using URL: afp://Stuart%[email protected]/Time%20Capsule
    Creating disk image /Volumes/Time Capsule/StuartsMacPro.sparsebundle
    QUICKCHECK ONLY; FILESYSTEM CLEAN
    Disk image /Volumes/Time Capsule/StuartsMacPro.sparsebundle mounted at: /Volumes/Time Machine Backups
    Backing up to: /Volumes/Time Machine Backups/Backups.backupdb
    Ownership is disabled on the backup destination volume. Enabling.
    Detected system migration from: /Volumes/My Book
    Backup content size: 850.0 GB excluded items size: 606.5 GB for volume Stuart's Drive
    Backup content size: 425.9 GB excluded items size: 67.3 GB for volume Macintosh HD
    No pre-backup thinning needed: 722.56 GB requested (including padding), 928.68 GB available
    Waiting for index to be ready (101)
    Copied 28.3 GB of 602.1 GB, 29340 of 1478089 items
    Copied 55.0 GB of 602.1 GB, 41596 of 1478089 items
    Copied 82.9 GB of 602.1 GB, 55899 of 1478089 items
    Copied 110.7 GB of 602.1 GB, 63347 of 1478089 items
    Copied 138.8 GB of 602.1 GB, 83831 of 1478089 items
    Copied 166.8 GB of 602.1 GB, 94574 of 1478089 items
    Copied 194.7 GB of 602.1 GB, 102854 of 1478089 items
    Copied 222.8 GB of 602.1 GB, 114388 of 1478089 items
    Copied 129159 files (242.5 GB) from volume Stuart's Drive.
    Copied 248.4 GB of 602.1 GB, 130414 of 1478089 items
    Copied 265.5 GB of 602.1 GB, 355699 of 1478089 items
    Copied 293.6 GB of 602.1 GB, 382912 of 1478089 items
    Copied 322.1 GB of 602.1 GB, 387974 of 1478089 items
    Copied 349.8 GB of 602.1 GB, 399204 of 1478089 items
    Copied 378.3 GB of 602.1 GB, 399358 of 1478089 items
    Copied 406.9 GB of 602.1 GB, 399441 of 1478089 items
    Copied 434.5 GB of 602.1 GB, 415817 of 1478089 items
    Copied 461.5 GB of 602.1 GB, 471528 of 1478089 items
    Copied 488.2 GB of 602.1 GB, 537277 of 1478089 items
    Copied 515.1 GB of 602.1 GB, 580446 of 1478089 items
    Copied 541.3 GB of 602.1 GB, 590386 of 1478089 items
    Copied 566.8 GB of 602.1 GB, 602496 of 1478089 items
    Copied 593.3 GB of 602.1 GB, 649575 of 1
    Message was edited by: Stuart Lawrence
    Message was edited by: Stuart Lawrence

  • Report error: ORA-22835: Buffer too small for CLOB to CHAR or BLOB to RAW c

    report error:
    ORA-22835: Buffer too small for CLOB to CHAR or BLOB to RAW conversion (actual: 7106, maximum: 4000)
    Has anyone come across this error?
    We're inputing text using the HTML Editor Minimal. The text is saving fine, but large text inputs, when combined with the html tags, cannot be retrieved from the database, i just get the above error. I believe there is an associated DB bug for this, but i'm curious if anyone has come across this before, and if they found a work-around?

    Did you solve this?
    I have a similar problem, as posted in CLOBs Quit Working Due to > 4000 chars - ORA-22835
    Thanks,
    --BobC                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

  • Clips too short for transistions?

    i am adding images to my movie from the photos tab and when i add a transistion between them, it says clip too short for transistions. now why is that? i added transistions between other images in the beginning, so why is it giving me problems right now?

    Well then how come when i click apply on the ken burns setting for the picture, it shows 9:01, sometimes 10:01, then i add the transistion, and it says too small.. heres the new thing that just happened, i added a reflection theme and added an image in the drop zone.. now when i add a transistion right after it to a clip that shows 10:12, it says the previous clip must have a duration of 9:01. the theme itself shows 7:01.. so how do i change the duration of the theme?

  • " Server Error [2009]: Failed to allocate resources for results data" IR Error

    Hi,
    We recently moved form 9.3.3. to 11.1.2.3 and we run only IR and SQR reports. When we run few IR reports we get the below error.
    "Script(x):uncaught exception:  Server Error [2009]: Failed to allocate resources for results data."
    Any thought on what could be the cause. I changed the DSA setting, HTTP config settings for timeouts. I followed a oracle Knowledge base document to make sure I'm setting the right parameters still it doesn't work.
    Any advise will be appreciated.
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    Can you please try to increase the timeout settings for workspace and check the issue.
    You can refer following KM article for more information :
    Hyperion Interactive Reporting (IR) When Processing a BQY in Web Client and iHTML Error: "Server Error [2009] Failed To Allocate Resources To Results Data" [ID 1089121.1]
    To try in 11.1.2.x check these settings in workspace :
    Please go to Navigate -> Administer -> Reporting and Analysis -> Web Applications -> Right click on RA_FRAMEWORK_LWA and select Properties. A
    Window pops up. In that, go to Applications tab and then go to Data Access Servlet. There are two values there
    i) Hyperion Intelligence Client Polling Time(seconds) => Set this to zero
    ii) DAS Response Timeout => Set this to 3600
    Restart the R&A services and WebApp after this change.
    Hope this information helps.
    regards,
    Harish.

  • Error: "This backup is too large for the backup volume."

    Well TM is acting up. I get an error that reads:
    "This backup is too large for the backup volume."
    Both the internal boot disk and the external baclup drive are 1TB. The internal one has a two partitions, the OSX one that is 900GBs and a 32GB NTFS one for Boot Camp.
    The external drive is a single OSX Extended part. that is 932GBs.
    Both the Time Machine disk, and the Boot Camp disk are excluded from the backup along with a "Crap" folder for temporary large files as well as the EyeTV temp folder.
    Time Machine says it needs 938GBs to backup only the OSX disk, which has 806GBs in use with the rest free. WTFFF? The TM pane says that "only" 782GBs are going to be backed up. Where did the 938GBs figure come from?
    This happened after moving a large folder (128GB in total) from the root of the OSX disk over to my Home Folder.
    I have reformated the Time Machine drive and have no backups at all of my data and it refuses to backup!!
    Why would it need 938GBs of space to backup if the disk has "only" 806 GBs in use??? Is there anyway to reset Time Machine completely???
    Some screenshots:
    http://www.xcapepr.com/images/tm2.png
    http://www.xcapepr.com/images/tm1.png
    http://www.xcapepr.com/images/tm4.png

    xcapepr wrote:
    Time Machine says it needs 938GBs to backup only the OSX disk, which has 806GBs in use with the rest free. WTFFF? The TM pane says that "only" 782GBs are going to be backed up. Where did the 938GBs figure come from?
    Why would it need 938GBs of space to backup if the disk has "only" 806 GBs in use??? Is there anyway to reset Time Machine completely???
    TM makes an initial "estimate" of how much space it needs, "including padding", that is often quite high. Why that is, and Just exactly what it means by "padding" are rather mysterious. But it does also need work space on any drive, including your TM drive.
    But beyond that, your TM disk really is too small for what you're backing-up. The general "rule of thumb" is it should be 2-3 times the size of what it's backing-up, but it really depends on how you use your Mac. If you frequently update lots of large files, even 3 times may not be enough. If you're a light user, you might get by with 1.5 times. But that's about the lower limit.
    Note that although it does skip a few system caches, work files, etc., by default it backs up everything else, and does not do any compression.
    All this is because TM is designed to manage it's backups and space for you. Once it's initial, full backup is done, it will by default then back-up any changes hourly. It only keeps those hourly backups for 24 hours, but converts the first of the day to a "daily" backup, which it keeps for a month. After a month, it converts one per week into a "weekly" backup that it will keep for as long as it has room
    What you're up against is, room for those 30 dailies and up to 24 hourlies.
    You might be able to get it to work, sort of, temporarily, by excluding something large, like your home folder, until that first full backup completes, then remove the exclusion for the next run. But pretty soon, it will begin to fail again, and you'll have to delete backups manually (from the TM interface, not via the Finder).
    Longer term, you need a bigger disk; or exclude some large items (back-them up to a portable external or even DVD/RWs first); or a different strategy.
    You might want to investigate CarbonCopyCloner, SuperDuper!, and other apps that can be used to make bootable "clones". Their advantage, beyond needing less room, is when your HD fails, you can immediately boot and run from the clone, rather than waiting to restore from TM to your repaired or replaced HD.
    Their disadvantages are, you don't have the previous versions of changed or deleted files, and because of the way they work, their "incremental" backups of changed items take much longer and far more CPU.
    Many of us use both a "clone" (I use CCC) and TM. On my small (roughly 30 gb) system, the difference is dramatic: I rarely notice TM's hourly backups -- they usually run under 30 seconds; CCC takes at least 15 minutes and most of my CPU.

Maybe you are looking for