CIN - with TAXINJ and "condition based excise determination"

Dear All,
Can I use TAXINJ with "condition based excise determination" for CIN implemenation. We already have TAXINJ and some plants are already working on it.
If anyone already using the same, please share the problems faced / experience.
Actually I done settings for above scenario, but while GRN I am getting Message as " BED, AED and SED for the excise item is zero". And BED not getting populated while doing GRn.
I have created a tax code "C1" and assigned to company code.
THen I have maintained condition record for JMOP in FV11 for BED. ALso settings done J1ID.
PO is created with this tax code C1, taxes are getting calculated when
checked at Invoice tab at PO.
But while making GRN message comes "BED, AED and SED for the excise
item is zero" and excise values dont shows at excise tab in MIGO
Regards

Go through
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/CIN+Configuration
and
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/09/ebf138cdd78a4be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Hope you will get good idea

Similar Messages

Condition Based Interface Determination in ICO (AAE) - PI 7.1 EHP1

Hi Friends,
We have PI 7.1 EHP1 - SP 04.
In our scenario, we have 1 outbound interface and 2 inbound interface. Based on condition, it needs to select the first inbound interface or second inbound interface.
In the normal configuration, we are able to select. (By click + icon and add condition in the Receiver Interfaces in Interface Determination Step)
When we create configuration using ICO (Integrated Configuration), there is no option in "Receiver Interfaces" Tab to add two inbound interfaces with condition.
Could you please clarify how do we do this in ICO?
Kind regards,
Jegathees P.

IMHO, condition based interface determination is not possible in ICO.
Use Multiple inbound service interfaces... You can handle in design level .. ESR level.
Check the Abhishek's blog... This might be helpful.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90dcc6f4-0829-2d10-b0b2-c892473f1571?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Note: Since in your case you need two receiver agreements, you cannot handle through ICO. The above link might be helpful to do multimapping without BPM.
Edited by: Baskar Gopal on Apr 26, 2011 9:53 AM

Reg. condition based receiver Determination

Hi,
    I need to send the records to two systems based upon the value
For Ex. All the material group record letz say (1,2,3,4,5,6) Shuld go to Receiver1 and only the records which belongs to material grp shud go to Receiver2.
I am trying using Condition based Receiver Determination
   For Receiver 1 :-
              I didnot give any condition.Coz all the records have to go to Reciver1.
   For Receiver 2 :-
                 I have written the condn in the Interface determination
            i.e) Material Group = 2.
But All the records are going to these two receivers.I have tried everything.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Anandan

Anandan,
Similar situation has worked for me. Please check the condition you have mention in Interface Determination.
In the Interface determination you need to have 2 inbound interfaces. Specify the respective condition for each inbound interface.
Example: if the Response field has the value as "Success" or "Failure" the message has to go to first interface. The message has to go to second interface only if the response is "Failure". so you can provided following condition in the interface determination:
<b>Condition 1:For first inbound interface</b> (/p1:MessageType/RecordSet/Response = F) OR (/p1:MT_RESPONSE_FROM_PS_BI/RS/Response = S)
<b>Condition 2:For second inbound interface</b> (/p1:MessageType/RecordSet/Response = F)
The above condition has worked for me. Hope this would be helpful to you.
Regards,
Sridhar

CAML Query with 10 AND conditions

Hello,
I need some help with a CAML query. This particular query needs to have 10 AND conditions. Quite frankly, with all the nesting it is driving me a little nuts:
What I have is:
<Query>
<Where>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column1' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>10341</Value></Eq>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column2' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>9539</Value></Eq>
</And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column3' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>183</Value></Eq>
</And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column4' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>35</Value></Eq>
</And>
<IsNull><FieldRef Name='Column5' /></IsNull>
</And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column6' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>4387</Value></Eq>
</And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column7' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>4204</Value></Eq>
</And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column8' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>36</Value></Eq>
</And>
<Eq><FieldRef Name='Column9' LookupId='TRUE' /><Value Type='Text'>213</Value></Eq>
</And>
<IsNull><FieldRef Name='Column10' /></IsNull>
</And>
</Where>
</Query>
I have added this into my ItemAdding Event Receiver as it will basically do a check for duplicate items based on the 10 columns.
If anyone can help guide me in this, it would be much appreciated. I have been using a CAML Query Builder to help.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:xji7jOxa5_EJ:aasai-sharepoint.blogspot.com/2013/02/caml-query-with-multiple-conditions.html+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6203821/caml-query-with-nested-ands-and-ors-for-multiple-fields
Since you are not allowed to put more than two conditions in one condition group (And | Or) you have to create an extra nested group (MSDN). The expression
A AND B AND C looks like this:
<And>
A
<And>
B
C
</And>
</And>
Your SQL like sample translated to CAML (hopefully with matching XML tags ;) ):
<Where>
<And>
<Or>
<Eq>
<FieldRef Name='FirstName' />
<Value Type='Text'>John</Value>
</Eq>
<Or>
<Eq>
<FieldRef Name='LastName' />
<Value Type='Text'>John</Value>
</Eq>
<Eq>
<FieldRef Name='Profile' />
<Value Type='Text'>John</Value>
</Eq>
</Or>
</Or>
<And>
<Or>
<Eq>
<FieldRef Name='FirstName' />
<Value Type='Text'>Doe</Value>
</Eq>
<Or>
<Eq>
<FieldRef Name='LastName' />
<Value Type='Text'>Doe</Value>
</Eq>
<Eq>
<FieldRef Name='Profile' />
<Value Type='Text'>Doe</Value>
</Eq>
</Or>
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

RH6 crashes with th and conditional build tags

Hello together,
The attached code worked fine with RH X5, but leads to a
crash with X6. To fix, you have to replace the <th> by
<td>, but it is not too easy to find the topic within a
project. The fix is quite easy, but it is hard to find in a big
project.
This happens, when the conditional build tag is used.
Thanks and best regards,
Katrin Lusser

Hello Peter,
My wife created the topic with X3 or X5.
She just tried again with X6 and after several changes (set
heading, insert, delete, etc.) she had the same constellation.
Unfortunately, until now, she could not find out the exact way to
reproduce. But it is definitely possible. We will post here, when
we find out, how to do it.
Best regards,
Michael

When i try to upgrade iPad, i cannot proceed with terms and conditions page

i forgot my apple ID password when i after i upgrade my ipad. So i changed reset my password online. After i entered new password, terms and conditions page appeared, however there was no response no matter what option i choose be it agree, disagree or A and B.
maybe i accidentally disconnected my ipad with my Mac air at that time? I was not paying attention to that. now i dont konw what i can do.
i do not know the version of the previous system. however i updated as it pompted up that there is a new update.

Reset iPad and continue with update.
Hold down the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button at the same time for at least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears
Note: Data will not be affected.

My Ipad has a white square with Terms and conditions, on the bottom is agree one the right, disagree on the left, but no button works? All this happend after I started an update from Chrome?

Terms and
Conditions
Send by Email
IMPORTANT c.etc.etc.etc. etc etc
A. iCloud terms                          >
B. Privacy Policy                      >
;kgj;kvjkbkjb/jb/ljb/jb/skdjvb kjsbkjb
sjk/vb.skjbv.kjbv.kjbvkjbv.kfjdbv.kjbv
.samndb .as b.s, , ß≤ kh.sdv;iyegveiu
etc.etc.
Disagree                                                                            Agree

Reset iPad and continue with update.
Hold down the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button at the same time for at least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears
Note: Data will not be affected.

Sql query data horizontally with sum and condition in a row

I am trying to get data from the following query in a row with total but not succeed and getting error message. Please help and advise.
Select empid,name,country,
sum(case category when 'JOB' then sum(core+RR) else 0 end) as 'JOB-Sum',
sum(case category when 'PRIVATE' then sum(core+PP) else 0 end) as 'PRIVATE-Sum',
group by empid,name,country
Note: Following query is good for getting result in one row but i have to put sum calculation with 'THEN' and want result in a row.
SELECT ID, MAX(case when Col1 = 'Yes' then 1 else 0 end) AS Col1,
MAX(case when Col2 = 'Yes' then 1 else 0 end) AS Col2
FROM MyTable
GROUP BY ID

Please show some sample data and expected output.
Regards,
Rob.

Condition based Interface determination

Hi ,
Environment : PI 7.1.
Scenario : File to Proxy.
In this scenario , We have a single file interface which reads a file and routes the data to two different inbound interfaces.
Steps followed to do this -
>>Defined two inbound interfaces interface1 & interface2.
>>Both interfaces are pointed to same ECC system.
>>Read the file using a single sender file communication channel.
>>Define receiver ECC in the receiver determination.
>> Define interface determination based on a value of a field in the file structure(source structure). Used XPATH to define this content based routing and selected operation mapping specific to the interface.
1 sender agreement
1 receiver determination ( not using enhaced receiver determination because we have only one receiver)
1 interface determination which has two receiving interfaces based on XPATH condition ( maintain order runtime is checked)
2 Receiver agreements.
2 Communication channels.
For example if you have 10 lines in a file , out of which if 5 lines has a value related to interface 1 & 5 lines has a value related to interface 2. It should push the data into two different proxies as configured.
We are facing a problem in this scenario -
There is no consistency in the logic. Some times it runs interface 1 & some time it executes interface 2.
based on condition 1 it routes the data to interface 1 successfully but the structure is not getting created for interface 2 so it is giving an error stating the interface 2 structure is not available.
In SXMB_MONI the branching steps show two subnodes but if you see the log it shows that in subnode 1 the sender is sender interface & the receiver is interface 1 based on the filter condition. If you see the log for subnode 2 then it shows the sender is sender & the receiver as interface 2 below that it shows another entry which shows the reciver interface is interface2.
Please evaluate and let us know if the approach we are following works or not. If there is any limitations please let us know how to achive this.
Regards,
Reddy

Hi,
Your design is correct but here you missed one point. Here the message is send either to receiver1 or receiver2 depending on the condition but not both. As this does not result in multiple messages with the same payload because only one condition can ever be true at runtime. For more details see the below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/46/8015de950e6be3e10000000a155369/frameset.htm
If you want to create multiple message then you need do 1:n mapping :
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs;jsessionid=(J2EE3417700)ID2056393550DB10021342992851308291End?blog=/pub/wlg/2927
Shweta.

PO Report with lines and conditions matched

Dear Experts,
I need a report that controls the Invoice Verification in the following scenario:
1- The PO's have product lines and have on conditions there is excise duty
2 - The invoice verification due to the type of business, it is manual and happens in two different moments;
2.a - on the first moment "day X" - it is made the invoice verification regarding the product
2.b - on the second moment ("day X" plus 15 days) it is done the invoice verification of the excice duty (it is invoiced on a separate invoice
We need a report that gives the invoices where excise duty was not yet matched , or still open just for excise duty invoice verification.
Many thanks in advance for your help
Best Regards
Jose

Dear,
Better send Requirements & specification form to ABAPer and discuss the possibilities, since 2.a and 2.b are looks not achievable with standard.
Regards,
Syed Hussian.

Help with pagination and conditional page breaks

I have a rather complex form where pages are added based on what the user has entered in a table with repeatable rows. For most of the pages, conditional page breaks are working fairly well, but I have a group of pages with nested subforms that need page breaks. The inner subform is breaking as expected, but the parent page break isn't triggering for some reason.
Is this a bug within Livecycle or is it possible to fix?
Thanks!

May be having a look at the form helps..
If you can send the form and XML data file to [email protected] I can have a look at it..
Thanks
Srini

IDOC_AAE in integrated configuration and condition based routing RCVPRN

Hi,
we send IDOC's from an ERP system to our PI 7.3 system. The IDOC_AAE adapter is configurated inside an integrated configuration. The routing should base on the RCVPRN context field. But in that case the sending process exits in SM58 of the sender system.
If I use the XPATH based condition with RCVPRN of the EDI_DC40 structure the sending process succeeds.
Are the context fields not filled/used by the IDOC_AAE sender adapter?
BR,
Daniel

Hi Daniel, I can confirm this behavior, context objects for Idoc adapter do not work with IDoc_AAE. I also have to use XPath. Regards, Martin

MRP and NDP based excise calculation

Dear All,
In our orgainsation we have two catagories of product.
in first catagory excise duty is calculated on MRP(-)38% Abatment and 2nd catagory product Excise duty is calculated on Net Dealer billing price.
Can any one help me how to configured both the scinerio in a single pricing procedure.
Regards,
KC Choudhury

Hai,
Hope ur query is related to Maximum retail price inclusive of excise.
You have to follow this
Check the OSS note no: 1104456 for this kind of purchase.
1.Create the PO with invoicing amt. Take tax code as a Zero tax code.
2.release the PO if release strategy applicable.
3.Do the GR for the PO.As u know the exact excise amt at the time of GR, u have to enter this excise values manually.
4.In the MIGO - Header - excise invoice tab - More documents - Miscellaneous tab - Flag the MRP indicator.This must be ticked, so that the excise base value & excise duty values can be changed. This you can change at the item level Excise tab in GR.
5.Now Post the GR & post the excise invoice.
5.While doing MIRO for this PO, reduce the invoicing amt with tax values in the item level, as this invoicing amt includes taxes also. Select the proper tax code at the item & header level. Simulate & post the vendor invoice.

Weird issue with spacebar and text based apps...

I've never seen this one before and I've been using OS X since the beginning.
I'm seeing this on my boss' computer so here goes...
When using any text based app ie Text Edit, Mail, Microsoft Office 2011, etc. if I try and write a word and then add a few spaces in between that and a new word the app won't let me add more than 2 spaces. If I create another user and try with the said apps there -- adding more than 2 spaces works fine. The thing is my boss doesn't really want to transition to another user because it would take him forever. Thus far, I've repaired permissions and deleted a few suspect preferences. Nothing worked. Any ideas as to why this is happening. Could there be some hidden setting that is user wide that would cause this?
Regards,
Scotty

Moving all the prefs to a folder on the desktop seemed to work. I figured that Mail would be important along with a few other apps like Address Book and iCal so I left them in the Preferences folder. The boss is going to have to deal with any other loss of preferences.
Thanks Tom!
~Scott

JPA Criteria : LEFT JOIN with an AND condition

Hi all,
I have a question regarding JPA criteria.
Here is my JPA query :
CriteriaBuilder criteriaBuilder = em.getCriteriaBuilder();
CriteriaQuery<Long> criteriaQuery = criteriaBuilder.createQuery(Long.class);
Root<Email> emailRoot = criteriaQuery.from(Email.class);
criteriaQuery.distinct(true);
Predicate globalCondition = criteriaBuilder.equal(emailRoot.get(Email_.type), EmailType.in);
Predicate responseMandatoryCondition = criteriaBuilder.equal(emailRoot.get(Email_.responseMandatory), true);
Predicate typeCondition = criteriaBuilder.notEqual(emailRoot.join(Email_.emailsOut, JoinType.LEFT).get(Email_.responseType),ResponseType.response);
globalCondition = criteriaBuilder.and(globalCondition, responseMandatoryCondition);
globalCondition = criteriaBuilder.and(globalCondition, typeCondition);
em.createQuery(mainCriteria.where(globalCondition)).getSingleResult();
Here is the result of this query :
SELECT DISTINCT email0_.ID AS col_0_0_
FROM EMAIL email0_
LEFT OUTER JOIN email emailso1_ ON email0_.ID = emailso1_.ID_EMAIL_IN
WHERE email0_.TYPE = 'in'
AND email0_.RESPONSE_MANDATORY = true
AND emailso1_.RESPONSE_TYPE <> 'response'
LIMIT 0 , 30
And here is the request I needed :
SELECT DISTINCT email0_.ID AS col_0_0_
FROM EMAIL email0_
LEFT OUTER JOIN email emailso1_ ON email0_.ID = emailso1_.ID_EMAIL_IN AND emailso1_.RESPONSE_TYPE <> 'response'
WHERE email0_.TYPE = 'in'
AND email0_.RESPONSE_MANDATORY = true
LIMIT 0 , 30
As you can see I need to check if the RESPONSE_TYPE is equals on the same line that the LEFT OUTER JOIN. Does anybody know how to write such an JPA criteria query ?
Thanks ,
Louis
Edited by: user13105928 on 17 févr. 2011 03:06

You cannot define an ON clause with Criteria, nor JPQL.
Perhaps you can reword the query to avoid needing an ON clause.
What is the query you want to do (in english)?
Can you just use an OR in the where clause?
There is a enhancement request to have ON clause support added, please vote for it.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=312146
James : http://www.eclipselink.org

CIN - with TAXINJ and "condition based excise determination"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for