Cisco AP disable PEAP server certificate validation

Hi,
My question if it is possible on Cisco 1600 AP's to disable the server certificate validation on a dot1x peap authentication method (please provide if any the appropiate CLI)
I now the in PEAP for a PEAP user implementation you want to validate the the server as that this is PEAP phase 1.
But we want only user PEAP as machine authentication, which I don't care the validation of the server. hence like in Windows you have a check box, so you can disable the validation of it.
Thanks in advance,
Kind regards,
Michel

Not really, let me explain the toplogy;
we want to enable 802.1x on the network switches and let the Cisco AP authenticate the AP (PEAP-MSCHAPv2) on the switch via 802.1x. Therefore we specify the following config on the AP:
eap profile PEAP
method peap
dot1x credentials test
username
password xxxxxx
interface GigabitEthernet0
dot1x pae supplicant
dot1x credentials test
dot1x supplicant eap profile PEAP
The question is the a possebility to disable the server certificate validation (as like in Windows) because we want to verify the AP, and yes I know for PEAP-user implementation it is a good practise to validate the server certificate.
Kind regards,
Michel

Similar Messages

Any way to bypass server certificate validation in AIR client?

Is there any way to bypass certificate validation and server identification for secure Channels or ChannelSets? I am aware of the existing workaround to import my own certificate into the user's CA chain, but I feel that having greater control on the client-side is preferred.
If there is not a way to bypass client-side certificate validation I will be filing this as a feature request at http://bugs.adobe.com
Thanks,
Karl
When producing a client-server solution it is occasionally useful to override the default behavior of HTTPS certificate validation and server identification. I would like to request the ability to override these systems in the AIR environment for applications installed with the "UNRESTRICTED" system access option.
Simply allowing the use of self-signed certificates without verification (perhaps signified by a secure protocol identifier other than "https") would provide adequate functionality, but some users may desire finer control.
This issue is partly addressed by bugs FP-711 and FP-214 but I feel it is important that any enhancement include the BlazeDS Channel in the case that the AIR application has unrestricted system access.
When deploying an AIR client application which is securely connected to a network appliance which is controlled by the same developer it is desirable to bypass the overhead of acquiring a PKI issued certificate for every customer. Independent, open-source, and not-for-profit developers could see increased ability to adopt the AIR platform with this improvement.
When deploying a network appliance to be used with an AIR application the requirement for a PKI issued certificate complicates the deployment of the network appliance by requiring DNS access, and thereby requiring Internet connectivity. Some customer sites require network isolation.
It is possible to generate a developer-specific certificate and import that certificate into the AIR client host's Trusted Root Certification Authorities list. This workaround deteriorates PKI best practices and complicates the installation of AIR software. It is not possible to depend solely on the ".air" packaging for installation with the added requirement to install a new CA on the user's host.
Java provides the requested functionality by allowing developers to provide their own implementations of javax.net.ssl.TrustManager for verification and javax.net.ssl.HostnameVerifier for identification. We have used this technique to communicate over the SDEE protocol with Cisco IDS devices which do not usually have PKI issued certificates.

Hi Robert,
No specific option to controle TOP/First features use.
However other options exist to control IQ resources.
Eg. Query_temp_sopace_limit, Query_Time, Max_IQ_Threads_Per_Connection, Max_Cartesian_Result.
Regards,
Tayeb.

Need for NPS server certificate with PEAP-MS-CHAPv2

Hi,
I have a question about a small setup I'm currently testing. In a Wireless access with 802.1X authentication based on PEAP/MS-CHAPv2, and a NPS server (MS server 2012R2), I've noted reading technet documentation that the NPS server or other RADIUS server
do have a certificate (issued by a 3rd party CA or by an AD CS environment).
However, it remains for me a point I would like to clarify (sorry I surely have a bad understanding of documentation). If my client is configured for not "validate server certificate", do I still need to have a certificate on the NPS server ?
Well, I know it is not secured, but this will permit me to test without configuring an AD CS, and without buying a certificate.
Many thanks in advance for your answer.
Regards,
Fabrice

You also need a server certificate in this case as the protection in Protected EAP is due to the encryption of the TLS session.
Not validating the server certificate just means that no additional check of the name is done, so the client would be able to connect to any RADIUS server - given that its certificate chain is valid. But the certificate chain as such is checked as in every
SSL handshake.
You don't need a certificate issued by a commercial CA though - you could use an inhouse PKI. For tests you could use a self-signed certificate as well.
Edit: If you want to test self-signed certificates the easiest way is probably to install the web server role and use its built-in option to create a self-signed certificate.
Elke

PEAP: Enforce that client must verify server certificate

Hi,
I have PEAP setup with server certificate. The ACS server is used for radius authentication and cisco wireless access point 1240 series are used in WPA2/AES. In my setup, clients are working fine with or without server certificate verification. how could i enforce that client should verify the server certificate otherwise the wireless not authenticated..
Regards

You could to that with an Active Directory policy or something like that. There isn't anything on the AP or Radius server that can be done.

Import a valid Server Certificate as a trustStore.?

How do I import a valid server certificate as a trustStore and put
this in jre/lib/security.
I have a Java class that needs to connect to a valid HTTPS Server
having a certificate issued by a CA.
Now,I have a Java client that connects to this server,and sends and
receives data.
I will need to import the server certificate into the jre/lib/security
directory?
I guess we need to do this so that the client accepts the server's
certificate
Has anyone understood my question?
Attached is my java class:
public class HttpsSender
String sURL = "SomeServerAddress";
public static String ec(String sMess)
String response=null;
try {
Security.addProvider(new com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.Provider());
System.setProperty("java.protocol.handler.pkgs","com.sun.net.ssl.internal.www.protocol");
/* Temporarily testing on Tomcat and hence the Context:A_SYMBIAN_SERVLET */
URL url;
String uri = "https://" + sURL
url = new URL(uri);
HttpsURLConnection hpCon= (HttpsURLConnection)url.openConnection();
hpCon.setRequestMethod("POST");
hpCon.setDoOutput(true);
hpCon.setDoInput(true);
/** Transfer Data over https */
DataOutputStream dos = new DataOutputStream(hpCon.getOutputStream());
dos.writeUTF(sMess);
/* Response from the Receiving Servlet.*/
DataInputStream dis = new DataInputStream(hpCon.getInputStream());
try {
response = dis.readUTF();
}finally
dos.close();
dis.close();
}catch(IOException e)
System.out.println("Error in Client " + e);
return response;
} // End of Method Encrypt.

You can import a valid server certificate into a Store with the keytool!
Good link:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=2&thread=4240
You must provide to the Java-VM where it can find the TrustStore:
-> on command line:
java -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=XXX/jssesamples/samplecacerts
For Testing the Debug Output can be usefull! Enable with:
java -Djavax.net.debug=handshake,ssl
-> in source code:
System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.trustStore",STORE_FILE);
System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword",STORE_PASS);

N79 NAM RM350 server certificate not valid "firmwa...

i have updated my phone frm v11 to v20 but nw wen i go to devices update to update to latest firmware
it says " SERVER CERTIFICATE NOT VALID"
i want to update to v30 plzz help anyone
reguards
zain
Message Edited by kaskay on 21-Aug-2009 10:42 AM

i am not sure that v30 had been released for nam devices, if it has have you tried NSU ?
http://europe.nokia.com/get-support-and-software/download-software/device-software-update
You know what I love about you the most, the fact that you are not me ! In love with technology and all that it can offer. Join me in discovery....

Disable ADF Client and Server side validation during drop down changes

In my ADF Faces there is PanelFormLayout containing dropdown with country code value. Changing the dropdown value should change the layout to different country.
If the data is proper in the form the Layout changes perfectly but if the data is not proper it gives client validation & the layout doesn't get changed.
I want to disable the client/server side validation while changing the dropdown.

Hi Just framing the Question once again -
In my ADF Faces there is PanelFormLayout containing dropdown with country code value. Changing the dropdown value should change the layout to different country.
If the data is proper in the form, the Layout changes perfectly but if the data is not proper it gives client validation & the layout doesn't get changed.
I want to disable the client side validation just for that page or panelformLayout
Issue -
If the data is incorrect on the form, user is able to change the countrycode from the dropdown but the layout doesn't changes because client validation is stopping.
Below is the code -
1) Changing the drop down cause the switcher to call the code - defaultFacet="#{backingBeanScope.AddressComp.displayType}" which changes the layout.
2) But if the data is not correct the country value is getting change with the new Country but the Layout is unable to get change. ADF start showing client validation.
<af:panelGroupLayout id="pglA1" partialTriggers="plcol1:table1 *usCountryId caCountryId*">
     <af:switcher binding="#{backingBeanScope.AddressComp.switcherComp}" defaultFacet="*#{backingBeanScope.AddressComp.displayType}*">
          <f:facet name="US">
               <af:panelFormLayout>
                    <af:selectOneChoice value="#{bindings.CntryCd.inputValue}" label="#{bindings.CntryCd.label}" required="#{bindings.CntryCd.hints.mandatory}"
     id="usCountryId" autoSubmit="*true*">
                    <f:selectItems value="#{bindings.CntryCd.items}" id="si14"/>
               </af:selectOneChoice>
               </af:panelFormLayout>
          </f:facet>
          <f:facet name="CA">
                    <af:panelFormLayout>
                    <af:selectOneChoice value="#{bindings.CntryCd.inputValue}" label="#{bindings.CntryCd.label}" required="#{bindings.CntryCd.hints.mandatory}"
     id="caCountryId" autoSubmit="true">
                    <f:selectItems value="#{bindings.CntryCd.items}" id="si14"/>
               </af:selectOneChoice>
          </af:panelFormLayout>
          </f:facet>
     </af:switcher>
</af:panelGroupLayout>

SCCM 2012 MP - Site Database Server Without Valid Certificate fail

When we just imported the 2012 Management Pack we cant get this monitor back to green state:
Site Database Server Without Valid Certificate (Database Certificate Validity Monitor)
But we have a valid Certificate, so i dont know what this monitor reacts on.
This info is gathered from Alert Context on the Alert:
< DataItem type =" MOM.RegistryData " time =" 2013-05-29T15:15:55.0774480+02:00 " sourceHealthServiceId =" 79B707F7-327F-214F-02FD-8523D5BB9141 " >
< Values >
< Severity VariantType =" 19 " > 3 <Severity>
< State> VariantType =" 19 " > 3332 </State>
</ Values>
</ DataItem>
Now what?
/Maekee

Hi,
Regarding the alert, please refer to the following page to check it:
Database Certificate Validity Monitor Monitor
http://mpwiki.viacode.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=145897
Thanks.
Nicholas Li
TechNet Community Support

AnyConnect 3.1 - removing Security Warning: Untrusted VPN Server Certificate!

Hi guys,
Is there a way to disable the warning generated from using self signed certs?
I would like to make the process as seamless as possible.
AnyConnect 3.1
ASA 8.4(2)
Thanks.

Hi,
We had problem with the above error message with our certificate when we moved to AnyConnect 3.1
We were instructed to request a new one
Also here is the link to Cisco site we were provided that explains the changes in 3.1
IPSec and SSL connections require server certificates to contain Key Usage attributes of Digital Signature and Key Encipherment, as well as an Enhanced Key Usage attribute of Server Authentication or IKE Intermediate. Note that IPSec server certificates not containing a Key Usage are considered invalid for all Key Usages, and similarly an IPSec server certificate not containing an Enhanced Key Usage is considered invalid for all Enhanced Key Usages.
Link to document
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/vpn_client/anyconnect/anyconnect31/release/notes/anyconnect31rn.html#wp1049936
Sadly I dont dable with certificates myself so I'm not really familiar with this.
- Jouni

Content server certificate verification

Hello, everybody,
we would like to use the proxy server as an HTTP-to-HTTPS converter for around 30 URLs/destination servers in a configuration as follows:
clients (actually another proxy)
--->HTTP---> web proxy
--->HTTPS--> firewall
--->Internet
We added the forward (http-->https) and reverse (https-->http) mappings in the web proxy already, and they work.
I'd like to know which certificate/key file is for client requests (not used here, only HTTP), and which is for the outgoing HTTPS requests for content servers, and how exactly content server certificate checking can be manipulated.
There are:
(a) a key file in magnus.conf
(b) a cert database in magnus.conf
(c) a security setting (on/off) in magnus.conf
(d) a key file in the Init statement in the obj.conf
(e) a cert file in the Init statement in the obj.conf
(f) a security setting (on/off) in the Init statement in the obj.conf
...but which is for what?
The admin document (which I have read up and down) mentions "security" and "encryption", but IMHO fails to state whether the terms refer to incoming requests (which I assume), and which refer to outgoing requests.
So in more detail:
1) If I generate a key and put a corresponding certificate into a key file, what is the effect if I mention this file in (a) or (d) above, resp.? Do these entries have to be the same (i.e., do they have to mention the same file)?
2) In (1), for which connection does the certificate/key apply: to requests incoming from the clients (if HTTPS/SSL were used there), acting as a server certificate, or as client certificate for outgoing requests, or both?
3) The certificate database in (b) and (e), resp., is it for verifying the client certificates in incoming requests (which is often mentioned), for verifying the content server certificates in outgoing requests (which is hardly ever mentioned), or both? I need to verify the content server certificates, and some of them are issued by strange or own CAs, so I need to add a few CA certificates.
4) Do I have to add the CA certificates as chain certificates or as CA certificates? "CA certificates" would make sense to me (after all, they are CA certificates), but those are apparently only for client certificate verification, so I added them as chain certificates (a chain of a single element...). Strange that if I click "Do not trust", a certificate that was earlier trusted for client certs is now "only" valid as CA certificate -- as if one was somehow "less" than the other.
5) With an Equifax server certificate on a certain host, I get a message that the content server allegedly refuses to respond to the connection or may be highly loaded. Using openssl, I can connect from the same host to the content server without problems, in SSL2, SSL3, TLSv1. It makes no difference if the Equifax CA certificate is in the cert database or not, or if "Security" is on or off, or if "Initialize certs only" is checked. Using ssldump, I see that the proxy gives a "bad_certificate" fatal alert to the server. (The list of supported ciphers is a lot shorter with the proxy than with openssl, BTW.) Happens with at least two content servers, both of which can be contacted without problems via openssl, and the server certificates of which can be verified with their corresponding CA certificates I have available.
6) What does "Security on", "off" and "Initialize certs only" actually do? (...apart from putting a line into obj.conf...)."Security" is such a broad term used in (c) and (f), but does it refer to the client or the content server side? (Yes, I know that SSL provides authentication and encryption, I'm just not sure about how to configure what on the proxy software.) Guess I'm repeating myself here ;-)
7) I read that there is a tool "certadmin". Is it provided with some other Sun software? (I think with the portal server, right?) I would love to get hold of a tool for really looking into the cert databases (not using the admin server functionality). I also heard of another tool, but don't recall its exact name -- something like idscertutil, or some other *certutil. Does this ring a bell with anybody?
I'm using proxy 3.6 SP6.
Any insights are welcome.
Thanks for your help,
Stefan

Gerd,
Don't know which version of fetchmail comes with 10.3.x and 10.4.x respectively.
However, older versions would check for an SSL certificate in an opportunistic way and still go ahead if there wasn't one. More recent versions will interrupt comunications.
In other words, since you do not use SSL you must disable it in fetchmail. If I remember correctly (not 100% sure), you must add:
sslproto ''
to .fetchmailrc
Alex

Wired 802.1x EAP-TLS Server Certificate Problem

I have setup wired 802.1x authentication using EAP-TLS with ACS 3.3 and backend link to Active Directory. Root CA certificates are installed on the ACS and Client PC. Machine certificates and user certificates are also installed on Client PC. A Server certificate is installed on the ACS. All has been configured as detailed on the Cisco Web Site (numerous documents).
If I set the client to authenticate the Servers certificate I get a failure. The clients log (Cisco Secure Services Client) states:
11:48:53.088 Validating the server.
11:48:53.088 Server list is empty, trusted server can not be validated.
11:48:53.088 Server list is empty, trusted server can not be validated.
11:48:53.088 The server certificate is invalid, the common name ACS-One.rotherham.gov.uk does not match.
11:48:54.776 Port state transition to AC_PORT_STATE_UNAUTHENTICATED(AC_PORT_STATUS_ERR_SERVER_TLS_CERTIFICATE_REJECTED)
11:48:54.776 The authentication process has failed.
If I look at the Auth log on ACS (set to full logging) it states:
AUTH 08/27/2008 14:09:04 I 0701 1492 AuthenProcessResponse: process response for 'paul.kyte@domain' against Windows NT/2000
AUTH 08/27/2008 14:09:04 E 0350 1492 EAP: TLS: ProcessResponse: SSL handshake failed, status = 3 (SSL alert fatal:bad certificate)
If I configure the client to not check the servers certificate it all works ok.
Can anyone tell me why my server certificate is getting rejected?
Thanks,
Paul

If Cisco Secure ACS runs on a member server and any user is to be authenticated using EAP-TLS, you must complete additional configuration in Active Directory of the domain containing Cisco Secure ACS. The username that you configured to run all Cisco Secure ACS services must also have permission to read user properties in Active Directory, else EAP-TLS authentication fails.

Android Client working on WPA2 PEAP without certificate loaded

I am trying to figure out why the andriod phone will work on our Cisco WPA2 Enterprise PEAP wireless when we use a custom internal certificate for authentication with our Cisco 1200 series AP's, ACS 4.x, and AD user group/accounts.
The certificate is not loaded on the client, nor from what I learned is very difficult to import for use when trying to install a MS generated certificate
I did debugs between my regular Domain computer which has the domain certificate, and the Andriod and collected captures; see attachment tabs.
I do see that the certificate is used somehow and I do see what looks like a ldap lookup.
See the attached xls sheet with a debug tab for each the PC and the android.
I stripped out any sensitive account/domain info for viewing.
I'm not sure if this is a potential security loophole or not and welcome a discussion on this.

Really?
Its been a long time since I set this up and tested this and understood all the components. I just read up on it again and it appears your correct that PEAP only requires the server (ACS) side cert and the users credentials are protected during logon within MSCHAPv2.
If I recall, When I set up our enviroment, we had to install our domain cert on Pocket PC's (warehouse scanners), to get them to work with PEAP as the cert was not from a default trusted publisher. I don't understand why this was an issue then. Any ideas?
Our AD client computers all get the root cert by default, and all we do is push the wireless setting to the client by GP.
I was under the impression that we were protected by the client requiring the domain cert, and that pocket PC's, and other rogue wireless devices would not work without them. So how to best control rogue devices without using some NAP system?

Two error - certificate validation operation took X milliseconds & Alternate access mappings have not been configured

Dear all,
I have two questions on my SP2013 standard (on premise). They are very usual and I can find lots of work around and resolutino on web. But I cannot fix my environment and I am looking for more detail explaination if possible.
At the beginning, I found there are lots of Critical error log in my SP App server every 1-2 minutes:
A certificate validation operation took X milliseconds and has exceeded the execution time threshold. If this continues to occur, it may represent a configuration issue.
My system doesn't have Internet access. After some research it happened to be SharePoint certificate CRL checking issue:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2625048/en-us
I applied BOTH resolustion but the error still throw.
After more research, it seems Sharepoint will keep looking for
http://crl.microsoft.com. Some discussion suggested to add a HOSTS line "127.0.0.1 crl.microsoft.com". I have added the line and now I see a new warning log:
Alternate access mappings have not been configured. Users or services are accessing the site
http://domain.com with the URL
http://127.0.0.1. This may cause incorrect links to be stored or returned to users. If this is expected, add the URL http://127.0.0.1 as an AAM response URL.
I guess Sharepoint is trying to contact http://crl.microsoft.com to retrieve the crl. How can I resolve both error? Why Microsoft have this design knowing that many Sharepoint site are sit within Intranet?
Thanks a lot.
Mark

Anything in the CAPI log? It shouldn't be going to the internet anymore.
Do you have loopback disabled?
http://blogs.technet.com/b/sharepoint_foxhole/archive/2010/06/21/disableloopbackcheck-lets-do-it-the-right-way.aspx

SSL VPN Failed to validate server certificate (cannot access https)

Hi all,
I have the next problem.
I've configured in an UC520 a SSL VPN.
I can access properly and I can see the labels, but I only can access urls which are http, not https:
I can access the default ip of the uc520 (192.168.1.10) but
When I try to get access to a secure url I get the msg: Failed to validate server certificate
I'm trying to access a Cisco Digital Media Manager, whose url is https://pc.sumkio.local:8080
Does the certificate of both hardware has to be the same?
How can I add a https?
Here is the config of the router:
webvpn gateway SDM_WEBVPN_GATEWAY_1
ip address 192.168.1.254 port 443
ssl trustpoint TP-self-signed-2977472073
inservice
webvpn context SDM_WEBVPN_CONTEXT_1
secondary-color white
title-color #CCCC66
text-color black
ssl authenticate verify all
url-list "Intranet"
   heading "Corporate Intranet"
   url-text "DMM Sumkio" url-value "http://pc.sumkio.local:8080"
   url-text "Impresora" url-value "http://192.168.10.100"
   url-text "DMM" url-value "https://pc.sumkio.local:8443"
   url-text "DMM 1" url-value "http://192.168.10.10:8080"
   url-text "UC520" url-value "http://192.168.10.1"
policy group SDM_WEBVPN_POLICY_1
   url-list "Intranet"
   mask-urls
   svc dns-server primary 192.168.10.250
   svc dns-server secondary 8.8.8.8
default-group-policy SDM_WEBVPN_POLICY_1
aaa authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1
gateway SDM_WEBVPN_GATEWAY_1
max-users 10
inservice
Any help would be apreciatted.
Thank you

Hi, thanks for your advise.
I'm trying to copy the certificate via cut and paste, but I'm getting a
% Error in saving certificate: status = FAIL
I dont know if I'm doing this right.
I open the https page from the DMM with Mozilla Firefox, and in options I export the certificate in PEM format.
I get a file which if I open with notepad is like
-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
MIICOzCCAaSgAwIBAgIET7EwyzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBhMQswCQYDVQQGEwJV
KoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEAdk7n+tJi0igrTD2o7RD9ty8MLTyHN4uk8km+7DbpEy0g
mxLY0UZswYvbj15kPdd8QbeGEdDR6SXOYePsfIRJzL0mqMON4oiUhsqAK5y2yC6R
nqy4wWQ2fGVEYAeLpb1jGKdZWpuag/CO90NMHcMiobfBh+4eTqm7kRPTEyma6V0=
-----END CERTIFICATE-----
If I try to authenticate the trustpoint, I get that error.
how can I export the certificate from the DMM?
I think that this file is not the right file.
and then, do I have to make some changes in
webvpn gateway SDM_WEBVPN_GATEWAY_1?
Should I choose the new trustpoint?
I understand that the old trustpoint is for the outside connection, no for the LAN connection.
Dont worry about me, answer when you can but I really need to fix this.
Thank you so much

How can I make Firefox trust a Server Certificate by Default?

I'm trying to distribute Firefox via Empirum. All settings are made using the CCK-Wizard Addon.
When I import our Certificates in CCK-Wizard, I can make trust-settings for CA's, but not for Server Certificates, and so the SC isn't trusted by default.
Is there any way to make the trust Settings for SC's in the install package, maybe through an option in about:config (didn't find any, but maybe somebody knows more than google :P )?
I tried to do it like PRF_1 suggested here https://support.mozilla.org/de/questions/687296#answer-112220 but in the last step I got an Error 1: C compiler cannot create executables.
Regards,
Bowser

Hello,
'''Try Firefox Safe Mode''' to see if the problem goes away. Safe Mode is a troubleshooting mode, which disables most add-ons.
''(If you're not using it, switch to the Default theme.)''
* On Windows you can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by holding the '''Shift''' key when you open the Firefox desktop or Start menu shortcut.
* On Mac you can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by holding the '''option''' key while starting Firefox.
* On Linux you can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by quitting Firefox and then going to your Terminal and running: firefox -safe-mode (you may need to specify the Firefox installation path e.g. /usr/lib/firefox)
* Or open the Help menu and click on the '''Restart with Add-ons Disabled...''' menu item while Firefox is running.
[[Image:FirefoxSafeMode|width=520]]
''Once you get the pop-up, just select "'Start in Safe Mode"''
[[Image:Safe Mode Fx 15 - Win]]
'''''If the issue is not present in Firefox Safe Mode''''', your problem is probably caused by an extension, and you need to figure out which one. Please follow the [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] article for that.
''To exit the Firefox Safe Mode, just close Firefox and wait a few seconds before opening Firefox for normal use again.''
''When you figure out what's causing your issues, please let us know. It might help other users who have the same problem.''
Thank you.

Cisco AP disable PEAP server certificate validation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for