Classical music editing (maybe a plugin?)

Hello,
I am a classical musician who has used a variety of audio programs for professional editing for commercial CD release of recorded classical music, but for more general teaching needs, I've started using Logic (just downloaded Logic X, but still have Logic 9). 
In this world, we look for an application that allows precision edits.  The work involves starting with a 3-4 hour multi-track recording session (this for about 10-15 minutes of music). During the session, every passage is played perfectly somewhere. As an editor, I string together regions chosen from around the session recording, with customizable crossfades. Logic can do all of this, but what I miss is the ability to do precision "nudging" of any and all region boundaries at any time.
The best such program for stereo only, 15 years ago, was called Sound Designer II, which worked on a playlist principle. Sound Designer was bought by Digidesign, who retired it when Mac moved from OS9 to OSX, forcing classical music editors to move to ProTools (or something else). One other program, a mastering program from TC Works, looked very much like SDII, and it lasted only a couple of years into the OSX time before it was dropped.  Other programs, each with their proponents, have come and gone.
What made Sound Designer and TC Works so wonderful was something we called a "nudge box."  I wonder if such a thing could be made as a plugin for Logic?  I know some classical editors who use Logic, but it has surprising limitations, which cost us a LOT of time.  For me the biggest thing: There is region boundary nudging, but only for the region ending, not the region beginning, nor for shared boundaries.  Region beginnings and shared boundaries can be adjusted only with mouse dragging. I hoped for an improvement in the new Logic release, but it didn't happen.  When I was a ProTools user, I could do all those kinds of nudges, but it was ungainly in other ways, and I HATED the proprietary plugins, the need constantly for a dongle, and the upgrades that made plugins and expensive hardware obsolete. I don't expect Avid to make things any better...
For the tracks being assembled (with all the carefully chosen regions), the nudge box in SDII and the TC Works program would show the wave for a region end (let's call it region A), a bar to represent the region end, a bar to represent the next region beginning (region B), a wave for the beginning and end of that region, a bar to represent Region B's end, a bar to represent the next region's beginning (C), and finally, the beginning of the wave for region C.
Like this:
A | | B | | C
Above were pre-roll and post-roll controls.  Below were two play buttons, one for A into B, one for B into C, according to pre-post roll amounts.  The boundary bars were selectable, individually or in groups.  There was a pair of nudge buttons (left/right) with a place to enter a nudge amount setting (in milliseconds).  Pressing the button would shorten or lengthen any region by the nudge amount according to which border bars were selected.  At each border bar pair, you could select a crossfade type (equal power, X, or any combination of fast/slow in with fast/slow out) and a cross fade length (again in milliseconds).  Finally, there was a button to advance through the regions, from ABC to BCD (then CDE, etc. to the end of the track).
With access to such a box -- and, of course, these all things that are controllable in Logic -- classical editors initially piece together a recording, but spend most of their time fine tuning the places where regions meet, with no need for mouse dragging.  In a typical 10-15 minute piece of music, there could be 50-100 regions, each ranging in length from a minute to less than a second.
There is no program I know of that has this kind of nudge box now.  Further, what never happened, to my knowledge, was applying this kind of interface to more than a stereo track.  In the old days, classical sessions were either recording to stereo (mixed down on the spot), or mixed down before editing. Now, typically, the final mix down happens during mastering, after the edits are done.
Is it possible for a plug in to replicate this kind of editing control in Logic Pro X, but for multiple tracks (say, applied to a track stack)?  If so, I know a LOT of people, including me, who would pay handsomely for it.  It would save us folks hours and hours of work on each project, providing an ideal workflow for this particular task.
If anyone knows a plugin writer who might be interested in corresponding further with me on this topic, please write to me at:
[email protected]
If I am incorrect in anything I've said about Logic's capabilities, please let me know.  The program is deep and rich, and beyond classical music editing, I'm am very pleased with it, and just scratching the surface. In classical music editing, I can get it to do what I need it to do, but am unable to find a comfortable and efficient workflow.  I'd love some advice about this.
Thank you very much,
David Froom

Hi David, although I can't provide any solutions you're not already aware of, I was wondering if you have tried to use the Junction pointer to Roll edit outgoing- versus incoming-takes?
I've given up hope a long time ago for a stereo editor in Logic 'alla' this mastering program from TC Works. Instead of that I've adapted my workflow to suit Logic's edit capacities. And lets face it, even the clumsiest editor app outperforms razor blade/ scissor editing in now a days. I fully agree with what you are saying though! Having had my share of complex classical music editing of all sorts in Logic, withstanding scrutiny of even the most critical (british) producers, I can say that I can accomplish just about any classical music editing task in this very program. And about efficiency……..well, thats a different kind of story.
Have a nice day!

Similar Messages

  • How do I stop iTunes from re-altering my sorting info for classical music?

    Hi there. Hope someone can help. This is really irritating me now.
    I have a lot of classical music in my iTunes library. Since very early on I have taken the decision to alter the Artist name in the sort field to the name of the composer rather than the performer as the listing of artists in classical music is so inconsistent (sometimes it's the orchestra, or the orchestra & conductor, or just the conductor, or the soloists, or it changes from track to track). I have kept the performer's details in the Comments box.
    This has been absolutely fine until the last year or so, when I have noticed that music that I have downloaded from the iTunes store automatically reverts to the original sorting information even though I've changed it. So, for instance, I will have changed "Alfred Brendel" to "Mozart" as the Artist for a Mozart piano sonata. And even though I have changed the Artist, the Album Artist, the Sort Artist and the Sort Album Artist ALL to Mozart and synced that successfully to my iPhone, the next time that I launch iTunes or turn on my iPhone it will all mysteriously have reverted to the original sorting information. And I don't want that for classical music - fine for rock, pop etc., but classical music has a different set of priorities. I'm guessing this has something to do with iCloud, but how do I stop it happening? It is really tedious to keep altering these things. And some bizarre anomalies have appeared, such as some early Baroque music (Monteverdi) being labelled by iTunes as Electronic in the genre box!! Which it clearly isn't! But the same thing happens - I change the genre, but it changes back! Surely once I sort something it should stay sorted!
    I'm sure there's a fantastically obvious explanation for this, and I apologise for missing it. But I don't know what to do . I have iTunes 11.3.1 and am running OS 10.9.4 (Mavericks).
    Many thanks.

    Yes, others are seeing this. Something in purchased media (I am pretty sure this has only happened with purchased media) is periodically checking back with the iTunes Store and resetting the tags in the iTunes library file but not in the actual media files (metadata are stored in both).  I haven't seen a truly systematic diagnosis of the issue (I use an old iTunes and have no iTunes account so I can't test anything myself).  There are temporary workarounds but tags will still revert after a time.
    2014 discussion about edited tags for Store purchases reverting to originals - https://discussions.apple.com/message/26077896#26077896 - edited tags are still present in the media file but revert to the originals in the iTunes library file.  Workaround is to refresh tags so media file tags are re-read and used in library file.
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/26193185#26193185
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/26335620#26335620 - user ended up rebuilding iTunes library from scratch
    Send feedback to Apple about this so they know it is an issue they need to investigate: 
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html
    Don't expect an immediate solution but maybe the next time they update the software it may be resolved.

  • Music Editing with Audio Hijack or WireTap

    WireTap Pro vs. Audio Hijack with Fission for one simple editing task
    I have a collection of about 500 pieces of classical music in iTunes and on my iPod and iPhone. Some recordings come with adequate fade-out or decay time at the end of each piece of music (or each movement), some with little or none. I would like to get into my iTunes library and extend the fade-out silence at the end of each piece to a time that better suits my ear -- adding perhaps 10-15 seconds before the next piece of music starts if I have the iPod set for "shuffle." I'm not wanting to edit sound out...I'm just wanting to extend or append a silence. Are either of these program well-suited to that task? Any glitches I should be aware of? If both can do what I need is there any reason to favor one or the other?

    I use Fission for such tasks - I've never tried WireTap.
    Audio Hijack is for recording internet streams or other sound coming through your computer. It's for making new recordings - you don't need it if all you're doing is the sound editing like you mention.
    With Fission, you can fade a song out or in, and do some other sound editing, like splitting a piece into two. It's not for making real minute cuts or real fine tuning, but it works well for simple editing.
    For adding silence, it's pretty straightforward - you move the playhead to the end of the track (in your case), and there's a menu item (under the 'clip' menu, I think, that's called "insert silence". Then a counter comes up and you can tell it how much silence you want, and it will add it at the playhead. It does it as a separate track, though, with a 'split' in between. So the next step is in the edit menu, 'remove all splits' (or you can do it manually).
    Then you can save the file - if you 'replace' the old file with the new one, you're done, and the new file overwrites the old one. If you give the new track a different name, then you have to navigate to the folder it's in and double-click to import it into iTunes, where it will have the same name (in iTunes) as the old track, even if you saved it under a different name. You can change the metadata for the track before saving, to avoid that.
    But I just add silence and then overwrite the old track, so it's gone from iTunes, and the new one is there.
    It can be a little tedious to do several tracks (one at a time). No real glitches - sometimes when messing with a track too much, there can be a 'popping' sound added, but it's rare and easily fixed by undoing the editing. You have to undo it one step at a time, but you can undo it every step back to the beginning.
    Also, Fission works on all types of sound files without transcoding - Apple Lossless, AIFF, mp3, AAC - it doesn't change the file format (unless you ask it to convert the file).
    Maybe somebody will post about WireTap Pro - I assume it can do the same things, but I've never seen the interface.

  • I have a large classical music collection.  As I uploaded into the IMAC needless duplication occurred in the genre classifications.  Some compositions are separated by movement and placed in "LP-Classical" genre, but in duplicated genres. How combine thos

    Question:  I have a large classical music collection which I have  uploaded into my IMAC computer. In the process many of the compositions were placed in needlessly duplicated genre categories ( a sonata turns in three SEPARATE "LP-Classical" categories, all 3 movements separated into different "LP-Classical"  categories, one atop the other.  How does one eliminate the foolish duplication and recombine the three movements into one composition? I am Desperate.
    Normal editing techniques do not work for this problem!  Thank you/

    Question:  I have a large classical music collection which I have  uploaded into my IMAC computer. In the process many of the compositions were placed in needlessly duplicated genre categories ( a sonata turns in three SEPARATE "LP-Classical" categories, all 3 movements separated into different "LP-Classical"  categories, one atop the other.  How does one eliminate the foolish duplication and recombine the three movements into one composition? I am Desperate.
    Normal editing techniques do not work for this problem!  Thank you/

  • Organising classical music

    I started to write this as a response to somebody else's query, but then I thought no, I'm asking for general guidance on the best way to organise classical music to be listened to on my Mac and on my iPod.
    I know that classical music lovers are a (threatened) minority, but oh, how I wish Apple would heed these regular sounds of anguish from us.
    *What we need*
    The 'Song' is an almost meaningless concept when organising classical music; 'Artist' is not much better.
    Classical music fans may want to:
    1. sort by composer
    2. within composer, possibly sort by type (eg symphony)
    3. within type, sort by work (eg Symphony 1)
    4. within work sort by movement.
    *Nested folders?*
    A pretty obvious case for nested folders? (Not to mention having a clear consistent way to order and group movements.)
    Yes - provided you dont have an iPod.
    Thus I can have a folder 'Beethoven', within that I have a folder 'Symphonies' and within that I can have a playlist 'Symphony 5' ( actually two playlists for my two different recordings, otherwise I risk hearing the first movement twice before moving to the second movement). To ensure the movements are played in order, I have to ensure they are listed in the right order in Names (ie have 1,2,3,4 in the title).
    This cludge sems to work in ITunes (although how nice it would be if Names and Albums were replaced by something a bit more akin to the world of classical music, and how nice it would be if one could have an Opus field.
    *Not if you have an iPod*
    But then this scheme falls apart if I sync with my iPod, which can't handle nested folders.
    I quote from my message of 21 October 2006:
    +... is there any sign of Apple introducing nested folders for the iPod (as it did with iTunes) and if not is there any manageable workaround for organising large collections of music?+
    If you have a playlist for every symphony within a folder called Symphonies within Beethoven, you end up with at least nine playlists to scroll through! (Imagine the effect on my 400+ Bach items.)
    I have found the only two useable viewing methods on the ipod are Playlists and Composers and both have serious problems. This is how they seem to work:
    Under Playlists on the iPod:
    If in iTunes, you have a playlist Symphony 1, within a folder Symphonies, within a folder Beethoven,
    on your iPod there will be an item for each playlist, ie lines for each of the nine symphonies And if you select one, you will get the four movements of that symphony.
    If you had made a playlist Beethoven Symphonies, there would be just one item in the playlist - but then once selected there would be all the movements of all the symphonies.
    Under Composers on the iPod,
    everything by Beethoven is listed, with a line per movement! Things are better if you have sussed (as I did not) that if the Album name for All the movements of Symphony 1 was exactly the same, eg 'Beethoven: Symphony 1', then this particular item appears once in the list.
    *So, what am I doing?*
    When not cursing Apple, I have already grouped music in folders by composer/broad category of music (in the case of the main composers) and under one playlist for minor composers (ie ones which I dont have much music for).
    I'm painfully renaming every Name of every piece so that the movements appear in the correct order.
    I'm painfully renaming the Album name of each piece so that all movements have exactly the same Album name (starting with 'Composername: )
    (By the way I tried and abandoned some people's strategies involving calling Composers 'Artists' and vice versa. Too messy, and besides, I do from time to time download the metadata from Gracenote CDDB - deeply flawed though it is - and don't want to have to do more editing than necessary.
    So, for example, for the first movement of one recording of Beethoven's Symphony Number 1 I have the following:
    Name-- Symphony 1 In C, Op. 21 - 1. Adagio Molto, Allegro Con Brio (crucial that the movements are numbered, to get them in the right order)
    Artist-- Nikolaus Harnoncourt; Chamber Orchestra Of Europe
    Composer-- Beethoven (I also put Bach for JS and only put the initials for the other Bachs)
    Album-- Beethoven: Symphony 1 In C, Op. 21
    *Is there a better way to do this?*
    Wouldn't be surprised. But you don't expect Apple software to be so bad that simple users like me have to work out a logic to make things work on both Mac and iPod.

    ed2345 wrote:
    What, for example will you do with an albmum of Maria Callas singing arias from many composers?
    I have indeed got an album of Maria Callas and I put each song under the composer. (I can after all select Callas under Artist and get all her songs that way.)
    ed2345 wrote:
    As a workaround for the iPod, I suggest to manually add the composer in to the Artist field (since the Composer field does not show on the iPod).
    As I said, I tried that and, apart from finding it a messy fix, it means changing EVERY entry, whereas sometimes I get a semi decent one from the CD or the database. (Actually the Composer field does show on the iPod - the problem is that I scroll for ages to get through Bach.)
    I'm pretty certain I sent feedback a couple of years ago, but see absolutely no signs of development of the metadata behind iTunes or the iPod. Sad. I'm an Apple user going back 20 years.

  • IPod Classic music artwork Displayed on TV????

    Is there a way to display my iPod Classic music artwork to my TV like my Zune does?

    You cannot drag and drop photos. Read your manual and you will quickly find out it mentions nothing. However in ITunes, click edit and preferences while your IPOD is connected. Click IPOD tab and you will see a photos tab. Designate where your photos are you want to snyc.

  • What's Best Approach for Multitrack Classical Music?

    Can someone suggest the best approach for recording classical musicians onto
    four tracks? In this scenario, they play until they make a mistake on, say,
    measure 24, stop, then (take 2) go back to measure 20 and play until the next
    rough spot, and so on. Ultimately there may be 15 takes that all need to be
    trimmed and stitched together.
    In the old (tape) days, this was pretty basic editing. I would use a blade and block
    to cut out all the bad stuff on the multitrack tape, then I could mix. But how do I
    do this in Audition? (I use version 1.5.)
    I can't do the cuts it in edit view because the tracks would get out of sync
    Assuming all the takes are in one session, in multitrack view, this most basic of
    functions seems to elude me. What am I missing?

    Al the Drifter wrote:
    If you follow Steve's advice, and after doing the edits you discover
    that one instrument should come up 1db, you are screwed.
    I could be wrong about this in the classical music environment,
    where things are not close-mic'ed but if I am, I am confident Steve
    will correct me.  Ha.
    You always run the risk of small changes between takes - and that's where Audition 3 and the new improved crossfades score rather heavily. You won't notice 1dB on a single instrument across a fade though - it's hard to spot this as a jump, even, unless it's on pure tone. No, I very rarely close-mic stuff at all, although I did with a clavichord recently - it's seriously too quiet to mic any other way.
    jaypea500 wrote:
     when recording classical music, any engineer worth anything has the mix down pat as it's being recorded. 
    That's the way they used to work, certainly - but not nowadays, especially if it's done on location, which most classical recording is. What's more likely to happen is that you'd use decent mic preamps feeding straight into a multitrack, or even some software on a laptop. I generally record like that - but I also feed the multitrack outputs to a Yamaha mixer via ADAT, do a mix on that and record it back to a spare multitrack pair. I don't actually need to do that - but having a mix available from the multitrack that's pretty much there is good as far as being able to play back takes to conductors is concerned.
    Of course, one of the other reasons that classical sessions recorded on location aren't mixed on the spot is that the monitoring conditions are invariably far from ideal, and I'd have it that no engineer worth anything would ever risk a final mix done on location.
    But I only get paid to do all of this on a regular basis, so what would I know? Must be something though - my customers come back for more...

  • Classical music organisation

    My carefully organised classical music collection on my iPhone is now impossible to navigate after updating to iOS5. I know I'm not the first to feel that iTunes wasn't designed with classical music listeners in mind and thankfully enough fellow sufferers were generous enough to post suggestions up to get around that, but iOS5 appears to have rendered them a waste of time. Can't say I feel too happy about re-categorising loads of music just to be able to easily access it on my iPhone. Think I'll lave my iPod running iOS4 unless anyone has any other bright ideas.

    Thanks to Mike and Lance for the replies. I had seen those four videos listed. Unfortunately, only the Lang Lang is a classical music video. Andre Rieu plays mostly "New Age" nonsense and the "East Village Opera Company" is -- I don't know what -- jazz-rock fusion, maybe. I like J-R fusion mind you, but I'm looking for classical recordings in this instance.
    Two Intel, Two Dual G5's, Three PowerBooks, etc.   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   A passel of Macs in the house.

  • Classical Music storing and sorting

    Hi all,
    I love classical music and have a lot of them in my iTunes and iPod 30G.
    I'm used to editing their tags like this:
    - Name: BWV 1048 - Brandenburg Concertos #3 In G - 1. Allegro
    - Artist: Capella Istropolitana/ Bohdan Warchal
    - Album: Bach: Brandenburg Concertos
    - Composer: Bach, Johann Sebastian
    But I think that this is not quite nice, because:
    - The name of this masterpiece is "Brandenburg Concertos #3"
    - "BWV 1048" is a sorting method, not a name
    - "In G" and "1. Allegro" are like suffixes of the name, the tune and the movement
    - "Capella Istropolitana" is an artist, but "Bohdan Warchal", the conductor, other artist
    Does anyone have a tip for me, to store and sort my music better?
    Thanks!
    Aldo

    As you say, in Classical music the composer is more important than the performer. Personally, I put the composer in the 'Artist' field as well as the composer field, and list the performers in the 'Info' section along with recording dates, venues, etc. Also, I put the 'year' as the year of composition, rather than the year of recording. For the track titles I just have the title or indication of the movement, eg 'Allegro' and use the track numbering to put them in the right order. So your example would end up as:
    - Name: Allegro
    - Track #: 1 of 3
    - Artist: Johann Sebastian Bach
    - Album: Brandenburg Concerto #3 In G, BWV 1048
    - Year: 1721
    - Composer: Johann Sebastian Bach
    - Notes: Capella Istropolitana/ Bohdan Warchal
    The downside of this is that you end up with lots of tracks called 'Allegro' and 'Adagio'!

  • Importing classical music

    I use iTunes 9.1.1 on Windows XP and want to import about 1.500 cd's of classical music (AAC 320 kbps). I see that every album is stored in folders the following way: first name of the artist and then in a subfolder the name of the album. (Artist / Album). For classical music that's not logical. Logical is: Composer / Album / Artist. Is there a possibility to change that?
    I also heard some rumours aout a new version of iTunes this summer. I hope there are some extra features on managing large libraries better. For example: if you have more than one library, you can hold the shift-key while clicking the iTunes icon for a popup that let you choose the library you want. That is rather complex. Why not a on-off box in the advanced properties tab in the Edit -Preferences menu option?
    Thanks for an answer

    For classical music I tend to use the Composer as the Artist & Album Artist and either discard the performer details or place these into the Comments field.
    If you're really particular about how your tracks get organised at the file & folder level then MediaMonkey has some extensive renaming tools. The drawback with using these is you then have to remove & reimport all your tracks from iTunes. I have been working on a script called FilenameFromTag to manage renaming my tracks just the way I want which also updates iTunes as part of the process. It is still kind of a work in progress but if you're interested you could tweak it to rename your files just the way you like. You simply select some tracks, call the script, and it renames them accordingly. At the moment it doesn't tidy up emptied folders or relocate folder art but I hope to import these features from the CleanDeadArt project soon.
    tt2

  • About N73 Music Edition

    Hails to everyone!
    I hope this is not a boring topic to start with
    I am considering to buy an N73 Music Edition, and I wanted to learn your personal opinions about the issue.
    Would you recommend/suggest buying one? Or would you advice to go with other phone brands?
    Thanks in advance
    Cheers

    13-Aug-200703:47 PM
    clonmult wrote:
    13-Aug-200702:26 PM
    grayburn wrote:
    Maybe you need a firmware upgrade.
    I'm on the v4 firmware, and its still slow though.
    Menu speed has improved a little for sure, but most things are still relatively painful, especially when compared to something like a SE K800 (which uses the same darned processor, running at a similar speed, around 200mHz).
    I had the ME software on my N73 and had no problems what so ever.
    How you doing anyway mate,it's Mr G btw from Whatmobile!
    Grayburn @ www.nokiausers.net & www.dailymobile.se....come say Hello!!!
    If you appreciate ANY help from a member,then show it by clicking on the Blue Star button, cheers

  • Using iPod for Classical Music?

    Good Morning,
    I've been loading my entire CD collection onto my iPod Classic (about 300 titles). My collection is all over the board, but a lot of it is classical music.
    With classical music, I'm having a problem neatly organizing my titles. Often, with classical music, there are multiple "artists" (performers, conductors, etc), but we only have one artist field in iTunes. Of course, I can list multiple artists in the "artist" field, but that makes a mess of things.
    I'm not an expert with iTunes, so maybe I'm missing something. Does anyone know a way to get multiple artists entered into iTunes?
    Thanks,
    Matthew

    *Grouping tracks into albums*
    Excuse the long post, but hopefully covering all the bases (that I can think of) will help you fix the other issues you are likely to run into as you try to organise your library.
    The iPod (and iTunes to a lesser extent) conflates two or more albums with the same title, most obviously with *Greatest Hits*. On the iPod this can result in one album acting as a combination of two or more. Selecting any cover gives all the tracks of all albums with the same title. The workaround for this "Greatest Hits" bug is to give each album a unique title - I tend to go for *Album - Album Artist* as this reads clearly in the iTunes browser. Alternatively you could use the wording as it appears on the cover, append different numbers of spaces for each different album or set different values for the Sort Album.
    iTunes relies on the Gracenote CDDB database when identifying CD's. This often marks collections or anthologies of an artist's work as a compilation. In iTunes, however, the compilation flag has the logical function of grouping together tracks with the same album name, but different artists on each track, e.g. "Now That's What I Call Metal 666!". These compilations are then all grouped together at the end of cover flow. Most of us however, would expect "Greatest Hits" albums to be listed with the other albums by the same album artist. For albums which are essentially by a single album artist or group it is best to set the appropriate value for the album artist and clear the compilation flag.
    Sadly the iPod ignores the Album Artist field when grouping albums which causes problems when some tracks list guest artists. You can simply mark the entire album as a compilation which seems to be the way iTMS handles it, however that's not an ideal fix. Short of waiting for Apple to address this issue (and as far as I can tell it goes back to the 1st gen. of iPods) we need a workaround. What I do is to put any additional artist info. in square brackets after the song name. E.g. *Track \[Feat. Guest\]* and then set *Artist=Album Artist* for each track. For anthologies where the Album Artist is credited as part of another group, e.g. for Cream tracks on an Eric Clapton anthology, I use *Track \[As Group\]*. For a track where the main Album Artist doesn't receive a credit, e.g. the first track of the Slim Shady LP credited to Jeff Bass, I just set the track name to *Track \[Guest\]* while still setting the artist to the album artist. N.b. I use square brackets to indicate this is information about the track rather than part of the song title and also use this style for Mix/Live/Bonus info.
    iTunes may split albums into two or more sections if some tracks from the album have different values for Artist, Album Artist, Album, No. of Discs or Part of a Compilation. Tiny differences such as trailing spaces, accented characters or variants of symbols can sometimes be quite hard to spot. The iPod is also more sensitive to case variations and may split or reorder an album that looks okay in iTunes. Normally overtyping the desired value for each shared field will complete the grouping of the album into one entity. Occasionally, however, this method seems to fail. When this happens I've found that you can force every field to update properly by adding some extra text - e.g. a trailing X, which once applied seems to complete the joining of the tracks into one album. Once this has happened the extra data can be removed and the album should remain properly grouped.
    The Sort Artist, Sort Album & Sort Album Artist fields can be used to override the normal sort order. For example iTunes automatically drops leading prepositions (a/an/the) so "The Beatles" are arranged under "B" instead of "T". Occasionally different tracks from the same album can have different values in these sort fields which can also break up the grouping. Making the sort columns visible in iTunes can help with spotting & correcting such problems.
    Multi-disc albums are often listed as *Album (CD1)* for CD 1, *Album (CD2)* for CD 2 etc. To display these properly using just one cover, each disc should have the correct *Disc X of Y* values set, and then the entire album should be given the single title Album. Being somewhat obsessive I also renumber the tracks sequentially, working backwards from the last track until I reach disc 1.
    With classical music you also need to be wary of alternative representations of artist/composers names. The menus will work best if for each composer you standardise on just one form of their name. E.g. make a choice between Mozart, W.A. Mozart or Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, and then apply it consistently. I tend also to use the Composer as the Artist & Album Artist and either discard performer details or place these into the Description field. (I’d use the Comments field but iTunes has a habit of writing long hex strings into it for no readily apparent reason).
    tt2

  • Changing GB to Indian Classical Music scale?

    Does anyone know of GB plugins that will let me work with Indian classical music scales? (E.g. the "Pa" note of Indian music is slightly sharper than the "G" of Western music, etc.)?
    BTW, there is a nice article on Indian notes vs. Western notes at http://www.perfectthird.com.
    Thanks..
    [IndiSoft]
    MacMini   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

    Welcome to the forum.
    I don't think such a thing exists. The closest you could come to this in GB that I can think of is to use the limited pitch shifting capabilities of GB on different tracks to get parts of the scale in each track. Then you'd have to divide up what you are playing between the different tracks so they would be in the right pitch. This would be a huge pain in the @ss, so I wouldn't advise it.
    However, there is nothing stopping you from recording real instruments using the Indian scale. There is no restrictions for real audio, just the limits of your imagination....
    Oh, and welcome to the forum.
    X

  • Classical Music Videos in the iTunes Store?

    In Europe, classical music videos are (or were a few years back) often shown on television. Mostly the performances were chamber music and they were filmed in beautiful locations -- baroque churches, castles, palaces, for example.
    I know that there are classical music videos (at least one) in the iTunes Store because I stumbled upon a video performance of the Hungarian Rhapsody #2 played by Lang Lang.
    Is there a secret to searching for videos of classical performances in the iTunes Store? I've tried everything I can think of, to no avail.
    Thanks!
    Two Intel, Two Dual G5's, Three PowerBooks, etc.   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   A passel of Macs in the house.

    Thanks to Mike and Lance for the replies. I had seen those four videos listed. Unfortunately, only the Lang Lang is a classical music video. Andre Rieu plays mostly "New Age" nonsense and the "East Village Opera Company" is -- I don't know what -- jazz-rock fusion, maybe. I like J-R fusion mind you, but I'm looking for classical recordings in this instance.
    Two Intel, Two Dual G5's, Three PowerBooks, etc.   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   A passel of Macs in the house.

  • No support for the N91 8GB Music Edition within iSync ?

    Hi all.
    After checking on the Apple website and seeing the N91 was supported by isync, I went out and purchased the newest version, the N91 8GB Music Edition. Basicly the N91, with an 8GB hard disk and a firmware update.
    However when I tried to use iSync it said it's not support, arrrr !!
    Can anyone help with this issue, I've had a look in the metafile and did a google for help, but there talking about the N91 working with older versions of iSync.
    I'm sure all it needs is some kind of update to the iSync metafile, but what and where? It's paired ok, and can access the drive via Bluetooth so know that's ok, have also tried USB but it doesn't even see the phone.
    Please help
    Thanks

    Problem Sorted
    Remove all bluetooth pairing of the N91 (if exitis) from the Mac and the phone and backup the file your going to edit below.
    - Find the iSync application.
    - Press CTRL and click with the mouse, and select Show Package
    - Then go to: Contects/Plugins/Nokia-N91.phoneplugin/Contents/Resources
    - Using TextEdit edit MetaClasses.plist
    - Search for N91-1 and replace with N91-2
    - Save the files
    And that's it
    Mr Apple one for the next iSync update ?
    My the way so far this phone is great !!

Maybe you are looking for