Cloud backup recommendation for imac

I would like to backup my iMac computer and external HD to a cloud backup service. Do you have a recommendation cloud vendor?

Similar Messages

DPM Off site backup recommendations for all workloads without using tapes

Hi All
I'm looking for recommendations for off site backups avoiding tapes if at all possible.
My scenario is as follows:
We are soon to be migrating our backups to DPM 2012 R2 and will be backing up all workloads to disk, this will be around 10TB initially but could ramp up to over 30TB as more workloads are brought in.
What we would like to do is remove the need for tapes and shove our backups offsite onto some sort of cloud storage. We've looked at the obvious Azure online option but unfortunately this doesn't support all workloads (just File, SQL and Hyper-V).
We would need a decent retention period (7 years).
We'd like to go as direct as possible to the cloud from DPM without the need to locally double up or stage.
I'm very interested to know what's out there and what are people using.
Cheers!

Yes but...
As it's going to be writing potentially GB/TB of data to the VTL file it might not be the most efficient to go directly across the cloud. There are lots of issues latency, speed, contention, etc. to take in to consideration. Most of the Cloud Storage appliances
like StorSimple, BridgeStor, etc. have the smarts of cope with variables such as above. Once the complete file is on disk moving it to the cloud is relatively easy.
I agree that you'll be duplicating data but it would be far safer to write locally then move to the cloud.
A secondary is a good option too but as you're looking for long term retention, 7 years, then it may be very tricky with file data due to the 64 VSS snapshot limit. For other workloads it would be fine but would require a significant capital investment to
create the infrastructure as DPM doesn't play well with new features like Storage Spaces.

Replacement Hard drive recommendations for iMac G5

I need to replace my hard drive on my old iMac computer and I wanted to know if anybody has a recommendation for an inexpensive replacement unit. I don't need too much memory space, probably anywhere from 500 G to 1 T would be plenty

Hitachi, WD Caviar, or any drive from [macsales.com] will be good. But remember that you get what you pay for. Look at [xlr8yourmc.com] and see what people there are installing.
Good luck,

External Hard Drive Recommendation for iMac 24

I'm a Mac Newbie; 25 plus years using HP's. I'm needing advise on best external HD for Time Machine and media storage. I currently have a MacBook 13" and an iMac 24 (3.06 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 1.0 TB Internal Hard Drive). I've noticed a lot of positive comments about OWC external drives, especially the Mercury Elite Series. Is there a particular model or size in that series that would make sense based on my current equipment? Also, just curious, there doesn't appear to be many recommendations for Apple Time Machine units; why not? Thanks in advance for your time into my query.

I'm very happy with my OWC Mercury Elite Pro. How large a unit you get it mostly a matter of your budget and how much data you want/need to back up. A 1TB external drive would probably do most people quite nicely for a long time, but if you're going to be accumulating a lot of video material, that will fill up space fast, so you might need a larger drive or RAID. OWC has RAID units up to 4TB.
just curious, there doesn't appear to be many recommendations for Apple Time Machine units; why not?
Do you mean Apple's Time Capsule? If so, many people are quite happy with it, but since it's more than just an external hard drive, you won't see it mentioned very often when someone asks for a recommendation for an external drive. If you need to share a drive between more than one system, and particularly if you're also in the market for a wireless base station, a Time Capsule might be just the thing for you. If all you need is an external drive for a single computer, a Time Capsule would be overkill.

Cloud Backup Solution for outsourced IT Management company

I really like Carbonite for this. We have used it on our subsidiary of 4 people. It is pretty much set it and forget it. You will get emails when backups are not working for a set amount of time.

In addition to working as an IT Manager, I also work as an outsourced IT Consultant for small / medium sized companies (and some individuals) that don't need or can't afford a full time IT person in house.Part of the services that I provide is ensuring that each customer's computer (or server) is backed up. Now that cloud backup has become more reasonably priced, I am looking for a solution that would allow me to centrally manage these backups for all of the different companies in one place. The current project that I'm working on is for a very small law office that doesn't even have a server, so it's only backing up desktop machines, but as time goes by I hope to implement a standard across all of my clients servers and/or desktops as needed. Some of the companies already have other solutions in place, so I guess my ideal would be to...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Dvd software recommendations for Imac

It seems that idvd is no longer installed on the imac. I purchased a 27 inch refurbished, went to create dvd movie from Imovie, but no software to write files to dvd.
Any recommendations from app store or elsewhere? Seems Apple wants me playing in the cloud or something rather than using dvd.

Exactly so. The latest imacs don't even have a Superdrive!
There is no real substitute for iDVD if you want t make video DVDs:
Why is there no iDVD on my new Mac?
https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3673
UPDATE & ADDENDUM:
But even though you can still buy iLife 11 that includes iDVD 7 from Amazon, Apple now make it difficult to install:
Poster jhb21939 posted this in another thread:
“when I attempted to load iDVD into a new iMac. A notice came up on the screen stating that the 'Authorisation Licence' had expired on 25 March this year (2012).
I contacted the Apple support team and eventually, I was told that the Licence had been withdrawn and could no longer be used.”
In other words Apple are now so adamant that we don’t use iDVD that they have tried to make it impossible to install.
In response, Old Toad posted this solution:
“You can still use it one all of your Macs. If you get an invalid certificdate message just set your Mac's clock to sometime before early 2011 and run the installer. After you're done reset the time back to the correct time.” He added this comment:
“It began after iDVD and iWeb were discontued and they were dropped from the Apple Store. All I can think of is the certificate was set to expire after a certain time period after the intitial iLife disc was released.
I've been able to use the installer even without setting back the date. I just clicked on the Continue button and it would work as expected. For some it would not continue unless the date was set back.”
The latest anorexic iMacs just announced do not even include a CD drive! Proof positive that Apple virtually prohibit the use of DVDs - although the newly announced Mac Minis do include a Superdrive.
Yet, they still include iMovie! Heaven alone knows or understands what you are supposed to do with your newly edited masterpiece - except make a low quality version for YouTube?

Printer recommendations for iMAc Core Duo

Greetings! I need a recommendation from anyone who is successfully using a multi function printer with an iMac Core Duo. I am returning an EPSON CX5800f because the scanning driver does not work. The printer works great but the scanner does not. Any success stories? Thanks Billy D

Hello, again! I am back. I returned the EPSON today and I am looking at an HP OfficeJet 7310 for printing, faxing, and scannng on my iMac Core Duo running OS 10.4.6. Any one with good or bad experiences with the 7310? I received an email back from HP saying that the 7310 would work with Intel Macs but I see no such indication on their web site driver download page. Plus HP has not said that the scanning driver for the 7310 would work with the iMac Core Duo. Any comments? Thanks!

Cloud Computing Recommendation for Small Business

Hey all,
So the company I currently work for is in need of a cloud service (other than iCloud) that caters to both Mac and PC. We just need it to be multi-user and also able to upload/download files/pics/videos that can be retrieved by any user that has access.
Thank You in advance

Dropbox is often recommended. I use it in a limited way as I'm not sure I want to have too much stuff stored in the cloud. That said, their product is easy to use and very reliable, in my experience. You can use it for free in a limited way to test it out, and then pay depending on how much storage you want:
https://www.dropbox.com/

Online backup recommendations for Aperture 3?

I'm interested in an online backup for just my Aperture library and would like to know if anyone has a recommendation and how it works. I have a vault archived to an external hard drive, and don't know, because of the way Aperture 3's library is stored, if I can do it easily or not. My library is only around 20GB right now, and would like to find a way do to incremental backups online, after the initial backup. I've heard about Crashplan, Mozy, Carbonite, Smugmug, etc., but don't know how to find a good one without wasting time. Thanks.

Referenced vs. managed should make no difference to a backup solution because a managed Aperture library isn't actually a file; it's a directory. It only has the illusion of being a single file when viewed in Finder.
An incremental backup solution can't actually tell the difference. The only reason Finder knows is because Apple puts an extended attribute on the directory node which flags Finder to not display it as a normal directory (but it is a normal directory). But any other software not programmed to check for this special flag would never know to treat the library any differently than it would treat any other directory hierarchy.
BTW, although you can descend into the Aperture Library and snoop around, you should NOT change anything. This can cause corruption as Aperture also maintains indexes & meta-data inside the library which it updates accordingly whenever it makes a change. If you were to manually make a change, you wouldn't also be able to update the appropriate meta-data and that will cause problems.

Backup recommendations for G5 10.5.8?

I'm wondering what the best backup solutions are for a G5 running 10.5.8. I'm open to online options and whatever other kinds of options there are. I'd also appreciate any advice on options I should avoid. (Unfortunately I have never backed up my machine, so I'm brand new at this.)
Thanks in advance for any advice you may have.
Chris

Hi Chris,
Personally I'd avoid online backups, they're slow, expensive, and not very useful if say your Hard Drive goes down.
I strongly recommend that you get a good Firewire drive to Clone your Internal drive to ASAP!
http://eshop.macsales.com/search/firewire+drives
Many of those come with Backup SW, or...
Get carbon copy cloner to make an exact copy of your old HD to the New one...
http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html
Or SuperDuper...
http://www.shirt-pocket.com/SuperDuper/
Or the most expensive one & my favorite, Tri-Backup...
http://www.tri-edre.com/english/products/tribackup.html

Looking for recommendations for iMac support for senior citizens in their home in Sunset Hills, Missouri

I am looking for someone to help my parents with using their iMac in their home in Sunset Hill, Missouri ( St Louis County).

http://www.apple.com/buy lists authorized service centers 1-800-APLCARE offers free 90 dsy support for new hardware after purchase, which can be extended with the 3 year Applecare plan at http://www.apple.com/support Many usergroups offer local unauthorized support through http://www.apple.com/usergroups and so do many colleges and universities have unlisted groups. Or they can come to this forum once they know what they need support with and post through this link https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-2463

Cloud Backup Software for mac?

Hello
At this moment we backup our Server Data to an external RAID1 and take them out of the office 3 days a week.
Now we intend to store the Backups to an own Cloud Service at a private place, with an NAS or an macmini server. The Speed of the Internet ist Fast Enough Down 250000 kbit/s - Up 15000 kbit/s.
We can't subrscribe to most of the most of the cloud service availible because of legal rules the sensible data doesn't allowed to be stored abroad.
Is their a got software which is able to backup the data over the internet device connected in the net. (If possible without an NSA BackDoor)
regards
Gérard

If there is some national security entity is interested in or actively targeting your organization, then you're already toast. Such entities are far better funded, with far more experience and tools, and have far greater reach than most any private entity can ever manage.
cpragman has discussed some of the details of the general backup sequence, if you're using some of the standard, commercial tools.
If you're thinking of "rolling your own scheme", and based on what I'm inferring was a reference to OwnCloud (or to running your own storage on your own (remote) server, that's little more than encrypting your data locally, and pushing the wads of data to your own remote storage server. Biggest issues here tend to be the recovery testing, the details of the implementation of the encryption used, and also obviously scrupulously controlling access to your keys; PKE will work here and means you can keep your private keys more tightly controlled — encrypt the data to the public key of the "backups"), as will AES or similar symmetric encryption. The data encryption itself is a fairly isolated part of this whole backup processing, and various security mistakes tend happen with the handling and with processing around that — not within the encryption itself — when you're using the typical encryption tools correctly.
Compress your data before you encrypt it. Only then transfer it. Properly encrypted data does not compress.
I'd probably then transfer the files to the remote site with sftp or similar, or via VPN. Preferably with PFS enabled, if you're sufficiently paranoid.
Calculate using your 15 ~Mbps link speed against the volume of data involved; against the average backup transfer size when compressed and encrypted. That'll tell you how long the transfers will require, and whether that link is fast enough. If it's not, you'll either need to do partial transfers — which are more complex to manage and to restore — or you'll need a faster link.
Test the complete recovery process from whatever you implement. At least once, and preferably periodically. Document it, too, as you won't be thinking as clearly when the server(s) are down.
Some comments from folks that have used OwnCloud on Mac and Linux.

Antivirus software recommendations for IMac ( OSX10.7.5) and ipad2

I know it has been discussed and re-discussed, but please update me on the latest recommendations as I was not able to upgrade a year ago to Mavericks (even with Apple Support on 2 occasions) and I am reluctant to upgrade to Yosemite due to the WIFI issues. Update tells me that my software on my Mac is up to date, but that is not the OSX.

Mac users often ask whether they should install "anti-virus" (AV) software. The usual answer is "no." That answer is right, but it may give the wrong impression that there is no threat from what are loosely called "viruses." There is a threat, and you need to educate yourself about it.
1. This is a comment on what you should—and should not—do to protect yourself from malicious software ("malware") that circulates on the Internet and gets onto a computer as an unintended consequence of the user's actions.
It does not apply to software, such as keystroke loggers, that may be installed deliberately by an intruder who has hands-on access to the computer, or who has been able to take control of it remotely. That threat is in a different category, and there's no easy way to defend against it. AV software is not intended to, and does not, defend against such attacks.
The comment is long because the issue is complex. The key points are in sections 5, 6, and 10.
OS X now implements three layers of built-in protection specifically against malware, not counting runtime protections such as execute disable, sandboxing, system library randomization, and address space layout randomization that may also guard against other kinds of exploits.
2. All versions of OS X since 10.6.7 have been able to detect known Mac malware in downloaded files, and to block insecure web plugins. This feature is transparent to the user. Internally Apple calls it "XProtect."
The malware recognition database used by XProtect is automatically updated; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders.
The following caveats apply to XProtect:
☞ It can be bypassed by some third-party networking software, such as BitTorrent clients and Java applets.
☞ It only applies to software downloaded from the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not checked.
As new versions of OS X are released, it's not clear whether Apple will indefinitely continue to maintain the XProtect database of older versions such as 10.6. The security of obsolete system versions may eventually be degraded. Security updates to the code of obsolete systems will stop being released at some point, and that may leave them open to other kinds of attack besides malware.
3. Starting with OS X 10.7.5, there has been a second layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and Installer packages downloaded from the network will only run if they're digitally signed by a developer with a certificate issued by Apple. Software certified in this way hasn't been checked for security by Apple unless it comes from the App Store, but you can be reasonably sure that it hasn't been modified by anyone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so he could be held legally responsible if he distributed malware. That may not mean much if the developer lives in a country with a weak legal system (see below.)
Gatekeeper doesn't depend on a database of known malware. It has, however, the same limitations as XProtect, and in addition the following:
☞ It can easily be disabled or overridden by the user.
☞ A malware attacker could get control of a code-signing certificate under false pretenses, or could simply ignore the consequences of distributing codesigned malware.
☞ An App Store developer could find a way to bypass Apple's oversight, or the oversight could fail due to human error.
Apple has taken far too long to revoke the codesigning certificates of some known abusers, thereby diluting the value of Gatekeeper and the Developer ID program. Those lapses don't involve App Store products, however.
For the reasons given, App Store products, and—to a lesser extent—other applications recognized by Gatekeeper as signed, are safer than others, but they can't be considered absolutely safe. "Sandboxed" applications may prompt for access to private data, such as your contacts, or for access to the network. Think before granting that access. Sandbox security is based on user input. Never click through any request for authorization without thinking.
4. Starting with OS X 10.8.3, a third layer of protection has been added: a "Malware Removal Tool" (MRT). MRT runs automatically in the background when you update the OS. It checks for, and removes, malware that may have evaded the other protections via a Java exploit (see below.) MRT also runs when you install or update the Apple-supplied Java runtime (but not the Oracle runtime.) Like XProtect, MRT is effective against known threats, but not against unknown ones. It notifies you if it finds malware, but otherwise there's no user interface to MRT.
5. The built-in security features of OS X reduce the risk of malware attack, but they are not, and never will be, complete protection. Malware is a problem of human behavior, not machine behavior, and no technological fix alone is going to solve it. Trusting software to protect you will only make you more vulnerable.
The best defense is always going to be your own intelligence. With the possible exception of Java exploits, all known malware circulating on the Internet that affects a fully-updated installation of OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "Trojan horses," which can only have an effect if the victim is duped into running them. The threat therefore amounts to a battle of wits between you and Internet criminals. If you're better informed than they think you are, you'll win. That means, in practice, that you always stay within a safe harbor of computing practices. How do you know when you're leaving the safe harbor? Below are some warning signs of danger.
Software from an untrustworthy source
☞ Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, doesn't come directly from the developer’s website. Do not trust an alert from any website to update Flash, or your browser, or any other software. A genuine alert that Flash is outdated and blocked is shown on this support page. Follow the instructions on the support page in that case. Otherwise, assume that the alert is fake and someone is trying to scam you into installing malware. If you see such alerts on more than one website, ask for instructions.
☞ Software of any kind is distributed via BitTorrent, or Usenet, or on a website that also distributes pirated music or movies.
☞ Rogue websites such as Softonic, Soft32, and CNET Download distribute free applications that have been packaged in a superfluous "installer."
☞ The software is advertised by means of spam or intrusive web ads. Any ad, on any site, that includes a direct link to a download should be ignored.
Software that is plainly illegal or does something illegal
☞ High-priced commercial software such as Photoshop is "cracked" or "free."
☞ An application helps you to infringe copyright, for instance by circumventing the copy protection on commercial software, or saving streamed media for reuse without permission. All "YouTube downloaders" are in this category, though not all are necessarily malicious.
Conditional or unsolicited offers from strangers
☞ A telephone caller or a web page tells you that you have a “virus” and offers to help you remove it. (Some reputable websites did legitimately warn visitors who were infected with the "DNSChanger" malware. That exception to this rule no longer applies.)
☞ A web site offers free content such as video or music, but to use it you must install a “codec,” “plug-in,” "player," "downloader," "extractor," or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown one.
☞ You win a prize in a contest you never entered.
☞ Someone on a message board such as this one is eager to help you, but only if you download an application of his choosing.
☞ A "FREE WI-FI !!!" network advertises itself in a public place such as an airport, but is not provided by the management.
☞ Anything online that you would expect to pay for is "free."
Unexpected events
☞ A file is downloaded automatically when you visit a web page, with no other action on your part. Delete any such file without opening it.
☞ You open what you think is a document and get an alert that it's "an application downloaded from the Internet." Click Cancel and delete the file. Even if you don't get the alert, you should still delete any file that isn't what you expected it to be.
☞ An application does something you don't expect, such as asking for permission to access your contacts, your location, or the Internet for no obvious reason.
☞ Software is attached to email that you didn't request, even if it comes (or seems to come) from someone you trust.
I don't say that leaving the safe harbor just once will necessarily result in disaster, but making a habit of it will weaken your defenses against malware attack. Any of the above scenarios should, at the very least, make you uncomfortable.
6. Java on the Web (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it's not related, despite the similarity of the names) is a weak point in the security of any system. Java is, among other things, a platform for running complex applications in a web page, on the client. That was always a bad idea, and Java's developers have proven themselves incapable of implementing it without also creating a portal for malware to enter. Past Java exploits are the closest thing there has ever been to a Windows-style virus affecting OS X. Merely loading a page with malicious Java content could be harmful.
Fortunately, client-side Java on the Web is obsolete and mostly extinct. Only a few outmoded sites still use it. Try to hasten the process of extinction by avoiding those sites, if you have a choice. Forget about playing games or other non-essential uses of Java.
Java is not included in OS X 10.7 and later. Discrete Java installers are distributed by Apple and by Oracle (the developer of Java.) Don't use either one unless you need it. Most people don't. If Java is installed, disable it—not JavaScript—in your browsers.
Regardless of version, experience has shown that Java on the Web can't be trusted. If you must use a Java applet for a task on a specific site, enable Java only for that site in Safari. Never enable Java for a public website that carries third-party advertising. Use it only on well-known, login-protected, secure websites without ads. In Safari 6 or later, you'll see a padlock icon in the address bar when visiting a secure site.
Stay within the safe harbor, and you’ll be as safe from malware as you can practically be. The rest of this comment concerns what you should not do to protect yourself.
7. Never install any commercial AV or "Internet security" products for the Mac, as they are all worse than useless. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use one of the free security apps in the Mac App Store—nothing else.
Why shouldn't you use commercial AV products?
☞ To recognize malware, the software depends on a database of known threats, which is always at least a day out of date. This technique is a proven failure, as a major AV software vendor has admitted. Most attacks are "zero-day"—that is, previously unknown. Recognition-based AV does not defend against such attacks, and the enterprise IT industry is coming to the realization that traditional AV software is worthless.
☞ Its design is predicated on the nonexistent threat that malware may be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; it doesn't materialize from nowhere. In order to meet that nonexistent threat, commercial AV software modifies or duplicates low-level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a common cause of instability, bugs, and poor performance.
☞ By modifying the operating system, the software may also create weaknesses that could be exploited by malware attackers.
☞ Most importantly, a false sense of security is dangerous.
8. An AV product from the App Store, such as "ClamXav," has the same drawback as the commercial suites of being always out of date, but it does not inject low-level code into the operating system. That doesn't mean it's entirely harmless. It may report email messages that have "phishing" links in the body, or Windows malware in attachments, as infected files, and offer to delete or move them. Doing so will corrupt the Mail database. The messages should be deleted from within the Mail application.
An AV app is not needed, and cannot be relied upon, for protection against OS X malware. It's useful, if at all, only for detecting Windows malware, and even for that use it's not really effective, because new Windows malware is emerging much faster than OS X malware.
Windows malware can't harm you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows.) Just don't pass it on to anyone else. A malicious attachment in email is usually easy to recognize by the name alone. An actual example:
London Terror Moovie.avi [124 spaces] Checked By Norton Antivirus.exe
You don't need software to tell you that's a Windows trojan. Software may be able to tell you which trojan it is, but who cares? In practice, there's no reason to use recognition software unless an organizational policy requires it. Windows malware is so widespread that you should assume it's in every email attachment until proven otherwise. Nevertheless, ClamXav or a similar product from the App Store may serve a purpose if it satisfies an ill-informed network administrator who says you must run some kind of AV application. It's free and it won't handicap the system.
The ClamXav developer won't try to "upsell" you to a paid version of the product. Other developers may do that. Don't be upsold. For one thing, you should not pay to protect Windows users from the consequences of their choice of computing platform. For another, a paid upgrade from a free app will probably have all the disadvantages mentioned in section 7.
9. It seems to be a common belief that the built-in Application Firewall acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents malware from functioning. It does neither. It blocks inbound connections to certain network services you're running, such as file sharing. It's disabled by default and you should leave it that way if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate it only when you're on an untrusted network, for instance a public Wi-Fi hotspot, where you don't want to provide services. Disable any services you don't use in the Sharing preference pane. All are disabled by default.
10. As a Mac user, you don't have to live in fear that your computer may be infected every time you install software, read email, or visit a web page. But neither can you assume that you will always be safe from exploitation, no matter what you do. Navigating the Internet is like walking the streets of a big city. It can be as safe or as dangerous as you choose to make it. The greatest harm done by security software is precisely its selling point: it makes people feel safe. They may then feel safe enough to take risks from which the software doesn't protect them. Nothing can lessen the need for safe computing practices.

Need a full backup cloud storage recommendation.

iCloud advertises upgrades to the 25GB basic storage but that doesn't seem nearly enought for an offsite full data backup. I've got over 30K photos in iPhoto alone. Can anyone make a cloud backup recommendation for about 150GB of data?

This page examines some options:
http://rfwilmut.net/missing3
Several of them provide large - in a couple of cases unlimited - amounts of storage. You might find it useful to assess the amount of data you think you will want to upload and use your internet connection speed (remember this is in bits, not bytes) to calculate the time this is likelly to take.

Does Revel have a backup retention for deleted files in the cloud and what is the encryption level it uses both end-to-end and locally?

I'm interested in the premium version of this service however I'd like to know if:
1. Revel has any kind of cloud backup feature for accidentally deleted files.
2. What encryption strength does it use for it's end-to-end transfers and also for the local app and cloud storage
3. Does it have 2 stage authentication?
I ask because I need something picture friendly but is also HIPAA and SEC compliant.
thanks!

Hi nick2048,
We take security and privacy very seriously and send all communication over encrypted channels.
However, as a consumer photo site that supports user sharing, it is not our goal to achieve HIPAA certification
Hope this helps!
Glenyse

Cloud backup recommendation for imac

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for