CMR and Local Interfaces

I have a question on setting up CMR in an environment where I want to utilize local
interfaces within a weblogic server instance. In the deployment descriptor, I have
set up the home, remote, local-home, local, and ejb-class entries. I then want to
define the relationships between two CMP entity beans. Here is where I run into
problems.
1) If I define the CMR field using the local interface, I get an error stating that
the type defined by the bean for the field does not match that of the remote interface.
2) If I define the CMR field using the remote interface, I get an error stating that
the bean must use the local interface for the CMR if one exists.
Seems kind of circular to me. What am I missing?

If you want to be able to have mutiple children companies for a parent
company and you want to be able to query for the parent company for a given
comapnay then this is the XML I would do something like the following. In
your xml you had the mutiplicities inverted and also the cmr field was
either in the wrong place or misnamed (ie, if it had to be in the top block
then it should have been "childCompanies" instead of "parentCompany").
Assuming the bean name in the descriptor for the CompanyEJB is Company:
<ejb-relation>
<ejb-relation-name>Company-ParentCompany</ejb-relation-name>
<ejb-relationship-role>
<ejb-relationship-role-name>Company-Has-ChildCompanies</ejb-relationship-rol
e-name>
<multiplicity>one</multiplicity>
<relationship-role-source>
<ejb-name>Company</ejb-name>
</relationship-role-source>
</ejb-relationship-role>
<ejb-relationship-role>
<ejb-relationship-role-name>Company-Has-ParentCompany</ejb-relationship-role
-name>
<multiplicity>many</multiplicity>
<relationship-role-source>
<ejb-name>Company</ejb-name>
</relationship-role-source>
<cmr-field>
<cmr-field-name>parentCompany</cmr-field-name>
</cmr-field>
</ejb-relationship-role>
</ejb-relation>
In the CompanyEJB you would have:
public abstract CompanyLocal getParentCompany();
public abstract void setParentCompany( CompanyLocal parent );
-- Anand
"Steve Ebersole" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
The jar I am running through ejbc is attached (with source). The EJBobject naming
conventions are as follows:
ejb-class = CompanyEJB
home = CompanyHome
remote = Company
local-home = CompanyLocalHome
local = CompanyLocal
The pertinent ejb-jar snippet:
<ejb-relation>
<ejb-relation-name>Company-ParentCompany</ejb-relation-name>
<ejb-relationship-role>
<ejb-relationship-role-name>Company-Has-ChildCompanies</ejb-relationship-rol
e-name>
<multiplicity>Many</multiplicity>
<relationship-role-source>
<ejb-name>Company</ejb-name>
</relationship-role-source>
<cmr-field>
<cmr-field-name>parentCompany</cmr-field-name>
</cmr-field>
</ejb-relationship-role>
<ejb-relationship-role>
<ejb-relationship-role-name>Company-Has-ParentCompany</ejb-relationship-role
-name>
<multiplicity>One</multiplicity>
<relationship-role-source>
<ejb-name>Company</ejb-name>
</relationship-role-source>
</ejb-relationship-role>
</ejb-relation>
And the weblogic-cmp-rdbms-jar snippet:
<weblogic-rdbms-relation>
<relation-name>Company-ParentCompany</relation-name>
<weblogic-relationship-role>
<relationship-role-name>Company-Has-ParentCompany</relationship-role-name>
</weblogic-relationship-role>
<weblogic-relationship-role>
<relationship-role-name>Company-Has-ChildCompanies</relationship-role-name>
<column-map>
<foreign-key-column>PRNT_COMP_ID</foreign-key-column>
<key-column>COMP_ID</key-column>
</column-map>
</weblogic-relationship-role>
</weblogic-rdbms-relation>
In the CompanyEJB, these are the two scenarios I tried:
1)
public abstract Company getParentCompany();
public abstract void setParentCompany( Company prnt );
2)
public abstract CompanyLocal getParentCompany();
public abstract void setParentCompany( CompanyLocal prnt );
The only way I have been able to get it to work so far is to use thesyntax in #1
above and then to remove all references to the local interfaces in thedeployment
descriptors.
Thanks for all help

Similar Messages

  • Remote and local interface on same ejb 3.0 bean instance

    Hi,
    Is it posible to get remote and local interface on same ejb 3.0 bean instance.
    For example get local interface of a bean and than pass it as remote to client.
    Both interfaces must operate on same bean instance.
    Thanks
    Zlaja

    yes. You can implement multiple interfaces on a single class, so you can add a local and a remote interface. One trick to avoid duplicate code is to simply make the remote interface extend the local interface; then you only have to add the @Remote annotation and you're done.
    For example get local interface of a bean and than pass it as remote to client.You don't pass an instances to a client, a client looks up a remote instance of the bean through JNDI.

  • JBoss and local interfaces (JNDI)

    I'm trying to do simple example involving local interfaces on JBoss.
    There is Bar remote interface, which uses Foo, local interface. And the problem is - i cant locate Foo within Bar:
    ejb-jar.xml:
    <session>
    <ejb-name>BarEjb</ejb-name>
    </session>
    <entity>
    <ejb-name>FooEjb</ejb-name>
    </entity>To make FooEjb accessible for Bar via local interface, as manual says, i have to put additional reference in ejb-jar.xml for Bar:
    <ejb-local-ref>
         <ejb-ref-name>LocalFooEjb</ejb-ref-name>
         <ejb-ref-type>Entity</ejb-ref-type>
         <local-home>beans.FooHome</local-home>
         <local>beans.Foo</local>
         <ejb-link>FooEjb</ejb-link>
    </ejb-local-ref>But it doesnt change anything, JBoss maps Foo like this: "Bound EJB LocalHome 'FooEjb' to jndi 'local/FooEjb@13595063'", and
    public class  Bar ... {
    Object ref = context.lookup("LocalFooEjb");
    }resuluts in exception:
    "java.lang.RuntimeException: LocalFooEjb not bound ..."
    Question: how do i map local interfaces within JBoss to some human-readable and predictable name?
    Thanks for help.
    update:
    specifying JNDI names in jboss.xml does the trick, but i still dont understand why JBoss ignores local-ref element. So anyone who can explain is welcome.
    jboss.xml
    ...xml declaration..
    <jboss>
         <enterprise-beans>
              <session>
                   <ejb-name>StockListEjb</ejb-name>
                   <jndi-name>remote/StockListEjb</jndi-name>
              </session>
              <entity>
                   <ejb-name>StockEjb</ejb-name>
                   <local-jndi-name>local/StockEjb</local-jndi-name>
              </entity>
         </enterprise-beans>
    </jboss>Edited by: anykeyN on Jun 29, 2008 7:06 AM

    [skipped]

  • RPC web service session beans and local interfaces

    I am wondering if it is possible to use EJB 2.0's local
    interface (vs remote interface) with 6.1's RPC web service
    session beans. Since WLS generates the SOAP servlet that
    invokes the RPC session bean and I do not find
    a way to some how tell SOAP servlet to use local interface to
    get the session bean's local home interface, I am not sure
    this can be done.
    Any comments would be appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Peter

    Ta. Thanks for the info.
    Any idea when Local I/F support is due?
    -Nick
    "Neal Yin" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    "Nick Minutello" <[email protected]>
    wrote
    in message news:3d4413a4$[email protected]..
    I was just about to post the very same question - but for WLS 7.0.0.1.
    There are essentially two questions:
    1) (from a functional perspective)
    Can I expose Local Interfaces as SOAP using the auto-generation(servicegen ant
    tasks)?Local Interfaces support is coming.
    2) (from a performance perspective)
    Does the generated SOAP implementation go via the (expensive) RemoteInterface
    (ie marshalling) - or is the RMI marshalling optimised out (by setting<enable-call-by-reference>true</>)?
    You can set this option by yourself on your EJB. Web service runtime
    doesn't
    do any magic in this area.
    Regards,
    Nick
    "Peter" <[email protected]> wrote:
    I am wondering if it is possible to use EJB 2.0's local
    interface (vs remote interface) with 6.1's RPC web service
    session beans. Since WLS generates the SOAP servlet that
    invokes the RPC session bean and I do not find
    a way to some how tell SOAP servlet to use local interface to
    get the session bean's local home interface, I am not sure
    this can be done.
    Any comments would be appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Peter

  • Remote and local interfaces....

    Hey.. I used to work with weblogic 8, and now have to work with 10.01....
    I remember reading some documentation about that the container can see what JVM it is running in... and hence that creating localhome interfaces it not necessary.... creating remote interfaces should be ok... as the container wont be making any remote calls and serialization when it can see that the applications are running in the same JVM...
    But where can i find some documentation about this... ???
    Regards
    Kris

    Hi Kristian,
    The term local can be misleading ...
    You've got to understand that when you talk about local with EJBs, it's not in the same JVM but within the same EAR.
    If you want to go further, I detailed the use of EJB3 on WLS 10 on my blog :
    http://m-button.blogspot.com/2008/07/reminder-on-how-to-use-ejb3-with.html
    Regards,
    Maxence.

  • Cmp2.0 /local interface

    Hi! I'm trying to deploy the wrox ch16 sample on cmp2.0 and local interfaces and got the following error:
    java.lang.InstantiationException: local/local-home tag not supported in this version
    Does OC4J ver 9.0.2 supports the new cmp2/cmr and local interfaces?
    Thanks.

    Pedro -- Local interfaces were not available in v902 but they are available in the OC4J v903 Developer Preview. You can download this from OTN. Please start at http://otn.oracle.com/tech/java/oc4j/content_preview.html to find the download as well as updated documentation and more data about the J2EE compliant version of OC4J.
    Thanks -- Jeff

  • Remote and Home Interfaces

    Why do we need a home interface and remote interface for a ejb.
    Must these interfaces be there for each ejb?

    Why do we need a home interface and remote interface
    for a ejb.The Home interface is like a factory for getting to your beans. The remote interface is what you use to speak "directly" to the bean. It's remote because the bean is usually on a remote server somewhere (not in the same VM as your client code). The same is true for the home interface in terms of it being remote.
    The corresponding LocalHome and Local interfaces are for use when the bean in question is not remote.
    Must these interfaces be there for each ejb?You need either a Home and Remote or LocalHome and Local interface for all beans except Message Driven Beans.

  • Problem with Local Interfaces (WSAD 5)

    I built an Entity Bean with Local Interface and a Remote Interface (apperently they both have the same JNDI name in WSAD)
    and when I look up for the name from other Session Bean (same EJB group) and I try to cast it to the local interface there is a classCastException.............
    HELP ME

    Nidhi
    I had the same problems as you that went away. If you have both remote and local interfaces defined, and your remote inerface can be accessed via JNDI lookup using (say) "ejb/sessionbean/stateless/HelloHome", then you can access the local intercafe using "local:ejb/ejb/sessionbean/stateless/HelloHome".
    The URL http://localhost:9080/UTC/initialize?port=2809 is very useful to browse the JNDI tree. Just expand "Local EJB beans" and position your mouse over the item of interest. The JNDI lookup name will echo in the bottom (solid) frame of the browser. The only problem is that the jndilookup name will appear (mistakenly) as local:/ejb/ejb/stateless......, just get rid of the first forward-slash to make it look like local:ejb/ejb/stateless....
    Hope this helps
    Somnath

  • Problem with local interface

    Hi all,
    I have a problem with the local interface,
    after I change the Home and Local interface I get a message when compiling saying that the bean has to implement the inherited abstract method javax.ejb.EJBLocalObject.isIdentical (EJBLOcalObject) and the mothd isPrimaryKey()...why is that, do I need to implement these methods?
    Thanks,
    A.

    solved, wrong code

  • EXTREMELY URGENT!!  Last question on Local Interfaces

    Using Oracle9iAS 9.0.3
    Running on RedHat 8.0
    Trying to implement local interfaces to my entity bean. (Oracle9iAS Containers for J2EE for 9.0.3) provides an example for writing local interfaces.
    pg. 2-10 states:
    //The variable is specified in the assembly descriptor (META-INF/ejb-jar.xml)
    Object homeObject = context.lookup("java:comp/env/EmployeeLocalBean");
    but, if you look at the ejb-jar.xml they reference, it's as follows (pg. 2-12):
    <ejb-jar>
    <enterprise-beans>
    <session>
    <description>Session Bean Employee Example</description>
    <ejb-name>EmployeeBean</ejb-name>
    <home>employee.EmployeeHome</home>
    <remote>employee.Employee</remote>
    <local-home>employee.EmployeeLocalHome</local-home>
    <local>employee.EmployeeLocal</local>
    <ejb-class>employee.EmployeeBean</ejb-class>
    <session-type>Stateless</session-type>
    <transaction-type>Bean</transaction-type>
    </session>
    </enterprise-beans>
    </ejb-jar>
    Where does the EmployeeLocalBean name come from for the lookup?!
    Also, do I NEED to deploy BOTH remote and local interfaces to get my local interfaces to work? Another post on this forum had a problem where they couldn't view the configurations of the EJB because there were not remote interfaces available, but then later they said it was just a problem with the web-based Enterprise Manager.
    Please, can someone let me know if these questions are not interesting enough to the forum? Has nobody here ever implemented Local Interfaces on 9.0.3? Do I need to be posting these questions to a different forum? Please advise and I will take care to get my answers elsewhere if necessary.
    It's just that every resource I've looked at for Local Interfaces (which 9.0.3 CAN implement...right?!) has conflicting information and seems to have buggy implementations. Please....help!
    Thanks in advance!

    Strangely enough, I'm not aware of troubles with enviroment variables and JNDI lookup. There are some misunderstandings - compared to WLS, JNDI tree is different.
    Here is an example of Session EJB settings:
    <session>
    <description>Session Bean ( Stateless )</description>
    <display-name>XSLTransformerEJB</display-name>
    <ejb-name>XSLTransformerEJB</ejb-name>
    <local-home>com.ness.europe.integration.transformer.XSLTransformerEJBLocalHome</local-home>
    <local>com.ness.europe.integration.transformer.XSLTransformerEJBLocal</local>
    <ejb-class>com.ness.europe.integration.transformer.impl.XSLTransformerEJBBean</ejb-class>
    <session-type>Stateless</session-type>
    <transaction-type>Bean</transaction-type>
    <env-entry>
    <description>path to root transformatin file</description>
    <env-entry-name>config/RootTransformFile</env-entry-name>
    <env-entry-type>java.lang.String</env-entry-type>
    <env-entry-value>/oracle/product/IAS903/j2ee/MwCezPassport/xslt/passport.xslt</env-entry-value>
    </env-entry>
    </session>
    Next, there is an MDB with reference to it:
    <message-driven>
    <description>Message Driven Bean</description>
    <display-name>PassportMDB</display-name>
    <ejb-name>PassportMDB</ejb-name>
    <ejb-class>com.ness.europe.integration.inbound.mdb.InboundMDBBean</ejb-class>
    <transaction-type>Bean</transaction-type>
    <acknowledge-mode>Auto-acknowledge</acknowledge-mode>
    <message-driven-destination>
    <destination-type>javax.jms.Queue</destination-type>
    <subscription-durability>Durable</subscription-durability>
    </message-driven-destination>
    <ejb-local-ref>
    <ejb-ref-name>ejb/XSLTransformerEJB</ejb-ref-name>
    <ejb-ref-type>Session</ejb-ref-type>
    <local-home>com.ness.europe.integration.transformer.XSLTransformerEJBLocalHome</local-home>
    <local>com.ness.europe.integration.transformer.XSLTransformerEJBLocal</local>
    <ejb-link>XSLTransformerEJB</ejb-link>
    </ejb-local-ref>
    There is basically this piece of code to do lookup environment variable:
    String toRet = (String)this.initCtx.lookup("java:comp/env/config/" + paramName);
    (of course, the config prefix is our syntax)
    As for EJB lookup, this is used:
    final InitialContext context = new InitialContext();
    return (XSLTransformerEJBLocalHome)context.lookup("java:comp/env/ejb/XSLTransformerEJB");
    I didn't created those beans but I asked mate from my team and answer as to troubles was "no".
    Is the problem lies in "not hard coded" names of beans in lookup? We are not trying to get "env/ejb" but just straighforwardly EJB using its name.
    Myrra

  • Performance: T3 vs. Local Interfaces ?

    Hi there!
    What gain in performance can be expected from Local Interfaces?
    T3 and Local Interfaces are ment to tackle the same problem, if I'm not mistaken:
    enabling a local call to a Bean
    without serializing the parameters (enabling call by reference).
    I have implemented a test scenario using:
    - T3 with <enable-call-by-reference> false
    - T3 with <enable-call-by-reference> true
    - Local Interfaces and <enable-call-by-reference> false
    The testcase with T3 and <enable-call-by-reference> false is the slowest obviously.
    The testcase with T3 and <enable-call-by-reference> true works 15% faster.
    The testcase with local interfaces shows NO improvement compared to
    T3 and <enable-call-by-reference> false.
    Is there anything else I have to think about when using local Interfaces - any
    switch forgotten?
    Or do local interfaces do not improve performance?
    Thanks for any help...
    Manfred Schneider

    Hi there!
    What gain in performance can be expected from Local Interfaces?
    T3 and Local Interfaces are ment to tackle the same problem, if I'm not mistaken:
    enabling a local call to a Bean
    without serializing the parameters (enabling call by reference).
    I have implemented a test scenario using:
    - T3 with <enable-call-by-reference> false
    - T3 with <enable-call-by-reference> true
    - Local Interfaces and <enable-call-by-reference> false
    The testcase with T3 and <enable-call-by-reference> false is the slowest obviously.
    The testcase with T3 and <enable-call-by-reference> true works 15% faster.
    The testcase with local interfaces shows NO improvement compared to
    T3 and <enable-call-by-reference> false.
    Is there anything else I have to think about when using local Interfaces - any
    switch forgotten?
    Or do local interfaces do not improve performance?
    Thanks for any help...
    Manfred Schneider

  • Local interfaces and WLS 7

    Hi *,
    does anybody know if localinterfaces work in WLS7 SP1?
    thanx,
    Yauheni

    Yes. my classes were inclueded in system CLASSPATH. but Sun spec says nothing about
    that local interfaces could work only in the application context. it says that restriction
    is that it could work only on the same JVM. so it looks very strange, isn't it? i
    will try to pack everything in ear and try it again.
    Thanx,
    Yauheni
    "Dimitri I. Rakitine" <[email protected]> wrote:
    Yes, it looks like this is a problem. Your application used to work on 6
    because you
    added all your classes to the system classpath, right? And it sounds like
    in 7, local
    calls also depend on the application environment being set.
    Yauheni Prykhodzka <[email protected]> wrote:
    actually, may be that is the problem, we have no ear. we have a set ofjars with
    ejbs and a set of web applications, whci are not packed in war. couldit be a problem,
    when i use local interfaces?
    but spec says that local interface could be used inside a JVM. i thinkit should
    not play a role, if classloadres of ejb and component that use ejb aredifferent.
    is it true?
    Yauheni
    "Dimitri I. Rakitine" <[email protected]> wrote:
    Do you mean that servlet, which is a part of a .war which is deployed
    in
    the
    same .ear with the EJB components fails to invoke EJB's using local interfaces?
    Yauheni Prykhodzka <[email protected]> wrote:
    "Dimitri I. Rakitine" <[email protected]> wrote:
    Interesting. I guess that the problem will go away if you stop using
    startup
    classes
    (for example, use load-on-startup servlet instead to perform initialization
    steps).
    No. I get the same problem after weblogic started. If i try to use localinterfaces
    from another bean o servlet i get the same exception.
    Yauheni
    Yauheni Prykhodzka <[email protected]> wrote:
    Here is the exception, which i'm getting:
    <10.07.2002 11:43:55 CEST> <Emergency> <WebLogicServer> <000342> <Unableto init
    ialize the server: Fatal initialization exception
    Throwable: weblogic.t3.srvr.FatalStartupException: Can't start serverdue to sta
    rtup class failure IdGeneratorStartUp - with nested exception:
    [javax.naming.LinkException:  [Root exception is javax.naming.NameNotFoundExcept
    ion: remaining name: /app/ejb/dox.comp.IdGenerator.jar#IdGenerator/local-home];
    Link Remaining Name: 'java:app/ejb/dox.comp.IdGenerator.jar#IdGenerator/local-ho
    me']
    javax.naming.LinkException: . Root exception is javax.naming.NameNotFoundExcept
    ion: remaining name: /app/ejb/dox.comp.IdGenerator.jar#IdGenerator/local-home
    <<no stack trace available>>
    --------------- nested within: ------------------
    weblogic.t3.srvr.FatalStartupException: Can't start server due to
    startup
    class
    failure IdGeneratorStartUp - with nested exception:
    [javax.naming.LinkException:  [Root exception is javax.naming.NameNotFoundExcept
    ion: remaining name: /app/ejb/dox.comp.IdGenerator.jar#IdGenerator/local-home];
    Link Remaining Name: 'java:app/ejb/dox.comp.IdGenerator.jar#IdGenerator/local-ho
    me']
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.StartupClassRunner$1.run(StartupClassRunner.java:95)
    at weblogic.security.service.SecurityServiceManager.runAs(SecurityServic
    eManager.java:721)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.StartupClassRunner.run(StartupClassRunner.java:71)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:484)
    >
    The WebLogic Server did not start up properly.
    the JNDI name for local interface is IdGeneratorLocalHome. i use thisname for lookup.
    Thanx,
    Yauheni--
    Dimitri--
    Dimitri
    Dimitri

  • Could I configure local switching between sub-interface and global interface on ASR9k?

    Could I configure local switching between sub-interface and global interface on ASR9k?

    For 2 interfaces it is probably best to use an xconnect. It is faster and saves system resources (eg mac learning doesnt apply to xconnect).
    Config example:
    l2vpn
     xconnect group link
      p2p link
       interface Bundle-Ether100.4321
       interface Bundle-Ether500.4321
    EFP config:
    interface Bundle-Ether100.4321 l2transport
     encapsulation dot1q 4000
     rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
    interface Bundle-Ether500.4321 l2transport
     encapsulation dot1q 2000
     rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
    This example shows that you can link 2 EFP's with different vlan's together if you'd pop the tags.
    If the EFP's are of the same vlan, then popping the tag can be done but not a must. In general it is recommended to always pop vlan tags so there is a standard EFP design, but not for any technical reasons.
    When you use a bridge domain and using a BVI, you MUST pop the tags as the BVI has no notion of a vlan tag and wants to see "plain ethernet".
    regards
    xander

  • How will be the weblogic-ejb-jar and ejb-jar xml for EJB Local Interface?

    Hi,
    I have one ear application which is using Stateless Session Beans. I don't have any Bean to Bean communication . At present, the client is invoking remote methods thro Home/Remote interfaces. My doubt is , shall I implement EJBLocal home/ local interface to obtain this same functionality cos, in this app, both client and EJb bean have been deployed in same JVM. Can Local interfaces only be applicable to Bean - Bean relation ship?If LocalHome/Local interfaces can be implemented in my scenario, then may I know how will be the ejb-jar.xml and weblogic-ejb-jar.xml?
    thanks and regards,
    Venkat.

    Local interfaces are for communication between ejbs and their clients when both are in the same JVM. The clients can be normal clients, jsps, servlets, and other ejbs. If the client is not in the same JVM you cannot use local interfaces even though your client is another ejb.
    Advantage of using local interface is it reduces the network overhead.
    For more information you can download Mastering Enterprise Java Beans Third Edition by Ed Roman. You can go through 45
    You can download pdf version from.
    http://www.theserverside.com/books/wiley/masteringEJB/index.tss.
    Let me know the URL of the ejb doc that you referred.
    Thanks..

  • CMP Entity beans using local interfaces

    Why CMP entity beans with CMR relation ship using local interfaces only?
    Why we should not use remote interface to get the CMR field relationship?
    Pls give me the solutions

    "Local interfaces provide the foundation for container-managed relationships among entity beans and session beans. The bean uses the local interface to maintain its references to other beans. For example, an entity bean uses its local interfaces to maintain relationships to other entity beans. Using local interfaces, beans can also expose their state and use pass-by-reference to pass their state between related bean instances. "
    http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/ebeans/EJB20CMP/

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can I set all existing events in a ICal Server calendar to 'private'?

    I am consolidating my calendar histories. I have been able to get everything in my iCal Server calendar. But what I'd like to do is set all events before a certain date to 'private' as public/private has been lost for all items. I do want them in the

  • Error: ORA-16525: the Data Guard broker is not yet available

    Hi , After upgrading from 11201 to 11203 ON AIX GI/RDBMS on standby but have not upgraded the primary db yet.I had set dg_broker_start=false and disable configuration before i started the upgrade . once the GI for oracle restart was upgraded i upgrad

  • Problem with part of file

    I am having a problem with a 20 minute Quicktime movie. There is a 45 second section in it that has started "strobing" or jittering. If I export a Quicktime movie from FCP of just the problem section, compress it and make a DVD of that, it plays perf

  • I want to create a blog(s) - don't want a..

    Create one easily? I downloaded Wordpress's zip file but I'm no SQL expert. Does anyone know where to get something that I can do this easily? I'm pretty good at code so it doesn't need to be blogs for dummies... but at the same time I don't want to

  • Import PO - PArtial Consignements

    Dear Friends, Need your advise on handling the given below Import Process. PR Made for Material A, 100 nos, 20 $, B, 100 nos, 120$, C, 100 Nos, 200$ PO Made for the same with Full qty and price and at the time of PO, Custom duty, and freight now know