CO41: cost determination error and no routing

Hello,
I convert planned orders in production orders massively with CO41. Is it possible to set automatically the answer "no" for popup "no routing" and "cost determination error" ? Is there a point of customizing for this? Or I can only say it one by one?
Thanks

Hi,
Goto OPL8 (Order type dependent parameters) and under Routing, you have Routing Selection selection option. If you do not have routing for this type of orders, then choose 0.
This will solve first issue.
Cost determination error - are you planning to release materials without SCE?
Thanks
Prem

Similar Messages

BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN - cost determination error when deleting operations

Dear all,
I have a problem with BAPI 'BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN'.
When I add and delete operations several times in an order using this BAPI, cost determination works incorrectly:
in transaction IW32 Plan costs sum on 'Costs' tab becomes wrong. But if I look at the detailed report (Rep. Plan/Act button on the same tab), the total plan costs sum is correct.
What I have tried so far:
1. adding method 'CALCULATE' for the header (within the same call and within a call in separate transaction)
2. changing the order in IW32 and saving it
3. 'Calculate costs' button in the same transaction
3. clearing buffers using FM 'CO_ZF_DATA_RESET_COMPLETE' before calling the BAPI,
but without luck.
Any help will be much appreciated!
Andrey

Hi Andrey,
Thanks a lot for the prompt reply.
As you said, the problem is in the standard BAPI BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN where the costs table is not getting refreshed, it is taking the buffer value.
Few OSS notes like 750606 were suggested by SAP, which also suggested the solution suggested by you, ( to use'Destination 'NONE' when callling the function module so that the BAPI will get called in the new session each time ),but it did not work. and SAP note also says that the complete solution is not yet implemented.
So, to resolve this ( to clear the buffer) I have used two programs, the internal one is called by the main program using 'submit' statmeent so that buffer value is cleared as it is a separate program. Finally it worked out
Thanks & Regards,
Vishnu Priya

Account Determination Error: How to properly cancel the invoice/ cr memo

Hello SAP Guru's,
What is the correct procedure in cancelling an invoice with Account Determination errors and subsequent credit memo? The error is a result of the user entering line items that are not permitted for the order type thus we suspect caused the Account Determination error. We were however unable to verify or correct that.
We now want to cancel the invoice and all the subsequent credit memos. What is the correct procedure in doing so?
I think we start off by VF03 then select the billing and select Display Document then Cancel? Is this correct?
Thank you.

Hi,
If you want to block specific line items in the sales order then you could enter a u201Creason for rejectionu201D in those line items and save the sales order. This can be done by going to the tab "Reason for Rejection".
If you want to stop delivery creation for the entire sales order then you could enter a delivery block in the sales order. Delivery block field can be found on the main "Sales" tab.
Cheers,
Shailabh

Document flow says "Acct determin error". The invoice not posted in FI

Hello SAP gurus,
Having an issue with my sales order (IJ1 single instance client 100 system)
The document flow is saying "Acct determin error" and in the header status - billing document Invoice posting says "Not posted in FI".
checked MM03 settings and everything looked okay. Can you please help? Thankyou

Hi Lionel,
Business Area is not supporting now-a-days. Hence somewhere the business area is activated and hence ask your FI consultant to remove the assignment.
Regards,
Elanchezhian. K.C.

Report on Account determination errors

Normally, when billing sometimes you get the account determination errors and then users have to investigate and find solutions. My user wants to run a report prior to billing to detect any possible errors that prevent the posting to accounting document. If it is, does anyone know of such report.
Thanks.

Hi,
There is no standard report for checking SD account determination, as there is no specific reason for account determination error, possible Account determination error reasons are account group is not maintain in customer master, new condition is not mapped in COPA. Finished product Sales, Account view is not maintain properly, Account key is not assigned properly to condition in pricing etc. If you need a report better you can develop based on above checks.
Regards,
Santosh

Do I miss something when checking the error 'Acct. determine error'

Hi there,
Need ur help urgently. Using VF02, I can see 'Acct. determine error' and do checking VKOA and also do the detail checking as all of you suggested in the previous posting. But everything is ok, do i miss something?
Thank you for your help
2tea

Hi,
1. check that the material is assembly or production related. if yes then the account determination setting for KOFK condition type should be there.
2. see that the customer and material account assignment groups in the billing document created. if it is missing then we need to add.
3. please check the process say if i want to create a credit memo , i have document type zcr, where u have created with some CR .
thanks
Kuntla

Sales order prod costing error and extracting the cost $ value

We are doing sales order product costing via custom program which internally calls FM CKKA_Costing_Process, CK_F_SD_ORDER_CALC and all other std processes and calculates the cost. In the event of error, the calculated dollar value is getting cleared. Is there any way we can find and extract the cost $ value in case of costing error?

Owen,
That's fine. Not worried about the error. But business needs the cost calculated with the error. Is there anyway we can get the cost $ while error. VA02 costing returns error too, but we have the cost updated.
Regards
Gopi

Router CRC error and IP conflict

Hi All,
I just setup my Cisco router 1921/K9 router via lease line. I managed to reach both end using ping command via local network. After an hour, my local LAN with different subnet starting to act weird, IP conflict error message pop up on the screen. It gradually spread over the network, PC by PC.
By issuing #sh int s0/0/0 and #sh int giga0/0 , I can see an input error, and CRC error. "Reliability" was perfect 255/255. Duplex and Speed all set to 100Mbps full duplex.
I have been looking into this matter for a few days, but still no idea what is actually going on. When I unplug LAN cable from giga interface to my local LAN cisco switch, IP conflict has disappeared.
Has anyone encounter this issue before? Kindly assist.

Hi,
As per my understanding you are facing 2 different issues one is related to IP conflict and other is CRC and i don't think both have any co-relation as such.
- Are you using DHCP to assign IP address to the users or static? Check if anyone is using the same IP addresses causing this problem.
- For CRC error check with your provider. To isolate any hardware related problem you can try loop test.
If you feel your query has been answered please mark this as answered. In case you have any additional query please feel free to contact.
Thanks & Regards
Sandeep

Error - unable to determine DB and SAP version

Hi!
Getting struct in prepare phase of solution manager 3.2 to 4 upgrade.
Getting error unable to determine the DB and SAP version.
during the prepare during the DBCHK
phase of solution manager getting the error " SEVERE ERROR: unable to
determine DB and SAP version."
The following files must be in the path described by
the environment variable "PATH":
icuuc30.dll, icudt30.dll, icuin30.dll [nlsui0.c 1489] pid = 2268
Kindly assist

dear Elmar,
Hi!
The entries are not there in path, but R3trans -d IS SHOWING ONLY following-
C:\Documents and Settings\smpadm>r3trans.exe -d
This is r3trans.exe version 6.13 (release 640 - 26.02.07 - 15:37:00).
r3trans.exe finished (0000).
And Echo path is - E:\oracle\SMP\102\bin;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32;E:\usr\sap\SMP\SYS\exe\run
Kindly suggest
sanjay
Message was edited by:
Sanjay Birari

Crc error between 2950 and 3620 router

I have connected the 2950 to the 3620, and the running-config of 2950 below:
2950#show running-config
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1279 bytes
version 12.1
no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
hostname 2950
enable secret xxxx
no ip subnet-zero
no ip finger
no ip domain-lookup
interface FastEthernet0/1
duplex half
speed 10
interface FastEthernet0/2
interface FastEthernet0/23
interface FastEthernet0/24
interface FastEthernet0/24.122
interface FastEthernet0/24.123
interface Vlan1
bandwidth 10000
ip address 192.168.10.200 255.255.255.0
no ip route-cache
delay 100
ip default-gateway 192.168.10.254
no ip http server
line con 0
transport input none
line vty 0 4
password xxx
login
line vty 5 15
login
end
And the 3620 router just set the interface ethernet0/3:
interface Ethernet0/3
ip address 192.168.10.254 255.255.255.0
half-duplex
I have connected the f0/1 of switch to the eth0/3 of router. There are many crc errors between the switch and router, and try to change the duplex and speed rate, but it didn't take effect. I ensure the cable is good.
Thank you for your suggestion!

First, thank you for your notice of my problems.
Yes. When I ping from both directions, I'm seeing the CRC error only in the switch. And I have cleared the counters in both ends.
And I try to connect to another port of the router, It exists the same problem.
I'm seeing both of the input errors and CRC errors.
The interface of f0/1 (in switch)is following:
2950#show int f0/1
FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0007.84fc.d1c1 (bia 0007.84fc.d
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
reliability 219/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Half-duplex, 10Mb/s
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:03:10, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:11:25
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue :0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 1000 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 1000 bits/sec, 3 packets/sec
299 packets input, 39511 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 5 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
164 input errors, 164 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 33 ignored
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
1058 packets output, 81544 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
2950#

Unity Connection 8.6.2 report error and issues

Hello,
I found some other hits on this error and tried the workarounds (restarting tomcat, and report data harvester) but am still getting "Unable to find any report data based on parameter(s)" for a certain timeframe on multiple reports when I know activity occurred in that timeframe.
User Phone login report, Outcall Billing Detail Report, others.
CUC version is 8.6.2.20000-2
Problem is during this timeframe someone dialed into system and changed the transfer extensions to various LD numbers throughout an entire day and the reports aren't showing these outcalls. Call Manager CDR data show the calls being placed from Unity VM ports and the Unity Conversation Manager traces I grabbed for the timeframe show the calls to those numbers to. I'm just trying to match up with a report and figure out if there is some other log or trace file I can look to determine for sure the caller logged in to the voicemail box and changed the transfer extension on it. (guessed the voicemaill password). The failed log in report doesn't even show the failed login attempt in output from traces below. The transfer extension dest addr was different on the transfers on this same mailbox. Have locked down the system since but want to get better grip on this with the reports and traces.
I looked over the CUC 8.6.2 SU1 and SU2 release notes and not seeing any resolved bugs for these matters either.
Here are some samples lines from Conversation Manager traces:
00:32:46.399 HDR|02/04/2013 ,Significant
00:32:46.399 |9744,PhoneSystem-1-001,E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='' callerName='' calledID='555123' redirectingID='555123' lastRedirectingID='555123' reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=8=FwdUncond] port=PhoneSystem-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=23 callGuid=E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9
00:33:55.006 |9744,PhoneSystem-1-001,E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9,MiuGeneral,25,Enter CAvMiuCall::TransferEx destAddr='715551231234' type=2=Release maxRings=4 mediaSwitch='00a499fa-a193-45b0-a153-564a64019eb8'
00:33:58.955 |9744,PhoneSystem-1-001,E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9,MiuGeneral,25,Exit CAvMiuCall::TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK
00:34:37.090 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='' callerName='' calledID='555123' redirectingID='555123' lastRedirectingID='555123' reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=8=FwdUncond] port=PhoneSystem-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=23 callGuid=9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806
00:34:50.403 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,CDL,11,CCsCdlImsAccess::AuthenticateSubscriber: Cannot authenticate user: JOESMITH IMS Result Code: 1 on line 108 of file CdlIms/src/CsCdlImsAccess.cpp: Error: 0x80046505 Description: E_CDL_SP_EXEC_FAILURE
00:34:50.403 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,CDE,3,Authentication Failed for Subscriber 555123 (Src/CsCallSubscriber.cpp 2969)
00:34:50.404 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,-1,-1,An invalid password entered when trying to log into a user mailbox. Details - [].
00:36:29.331 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,MiuGeneral,25,Enter CAvMiuCall::TransferEx destAddr='715551231234' type=2=Release maxRings=4 mediaSwitch='00a499fa-a193-45b0-a153-564a64019eb8'
00:36:33.484 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,MiuGeneral,25,Exit CAvMiuCall::TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK
00:44:53.444 |9743,PhoneSystem-1-001,FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='' callerName='' calledID='555123' redirectingID='555123' lastRedirectingID='555123' reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=8=FwdUncond] port=PhoneSystem-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=23 callGuid=FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6
00:45:20.019 |9743,PhoneSystem-1-001,FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6,MiuGeneral,25,Enter CAvMiuCall::TransferEx destAddr='715551231234' type=2=Release maxRings=4 mediaSwitch='00a499fa-a193-45b0-a153-564a64019eb8'
00:45:24.121 |9743,PhoneSystem-1-001,FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6,MiuGeneral,25,Exit CAvMiuCall::TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK
Thanks

Hello ebergquist,
As advised we could try to run a report before an upgrade was performed to verify if it will pull the information, which in the event it does we would be matching the bug, therefore access the CUC CLI and type the following command: file get install *
You will be required to have an SFTP available for the file transfer and port 22 open on the sftp client.
Once you receive the files you would need to check system-history.log, below is an example.
=======================================
Product Name -    Cisco Unity Connection
Product Version - 8.5.1.12900-7
Kernel Image -    2.6.9-89.0.20.EL
=======================================
02/24/2013 13:35:02 | root: Boot 8.5.1.12900-7 Start
02/24/2013 16:03:45 | root: Install 8.5.1.12900-7 Success
Once you check the time stamp and date of the upgrade try to gather a report for a time range before the upgrade was performed, even though they might be overwritten, there still could be a possibility that it succeeds.
If this bug is not the issue then you might want to take into consideration:
1. Make sure that the service ReportDB is [STARTED] in the output of the command: utils service list.
2. If you have Digital Networking on your server make sure there is no stalled replication. Go to RTMT (Real Time Monitoring Tool)> Syslogs> Select on the dropdown your server> Doble click on Application logs> CiscoSyslog. You can then do a manual search or sort with the filter option:
Severity: Error
App ID: CuReplicator
Hit apply. Below is an example:
Date: Feb 19 08:01:15
Machine Name: LAB1111
Severity: Error
App ID: CuReplicator
Message: : 1151681: LAB1111.corpnet2.com: Feb 19 2013 08:01:11.662 UTC : UC_UCEVNT-3-EvtReplicatorStalledReceiveReplication %[ClusterID=][NodeID=LAB1111]: Detected stalled replication receiving from location LAB1111. Waiting for missing USN 2222. This situation may indicate network connectivity problems.
3.Make sure that replication is working properly in the cluster. You can check them via the following commands: showcuc cluster status    and   utils dbreplcation runtimestate
For the TransferEx that you state changed to ceros -> TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK , this is just a hexadecimal value that is returned stating that the transfer that took place during the call was successful, in this case the actual transfer was to the following destination -> TransferEx destAddr='715551231234', and was during a call to ->calledID='555123' , this does not have to do with the actual change of a transfer number performed by a user.
Those traces won't be enough you will have to additionally set: ConvSub, level 3   and CDE, level 16 so that you may see output in the traces as the example posted in the previous thread.
Traces would be the path to follow in order to verify the user that changed the transfer rule, as this is as i understand the goal your pursuing.
However if it is of any help, another way to get on hold of the numbers that were updated on the Transfer Rule is to use the User Data Dump tool, this information reflects changes regardless of whether it was done via TUI (Telephone User Interface) or GUI (Graphic User Interface). For more information on the tool go to:
http://ciscounitytools.com/Applications/CxN/UserDataDump/Help/UserDataDump.htm
Traces are extensive to be reviewed if done manually, however you can do a text search with a tool as Notepad ++ to look for keywords as "NewTransferNumber =" or "CDE,16,Transfer allowed", once you find this you check the call GUIDwhich is the reference number of the call and that exists during the entire length of the call, whether it is while a person is leaving a voicemail or the user is accessing his/her's inbox. This would speed up your search.
So as explained in the first thread you would then do another text search returning all possible matches with that callGUID.
Now if you get to the very beginning of the call you would see something like:
Line 13712: 18:58:05.156 |24720,CCIE-1-001,0C9C97BDF5F444F0B535D231C32DDCB4,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='2199' callerName='' calledID='6789' redirectingID='' lastRedirectingID='' reason=1=DirectlastReason=1024=Unknown] port=CCIE-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=1callGuid=0C9C97BDF5F444F0B535D231C32DDCB4
In this example you see my test user callerID='2199' calling the Pilot number 6789 which is the voicemail button
calledID='6789, and the what type of call is it whether Forward or Direct, when logging to voicemail you are going to see Direct which is going to match the Direct Routing Rules and send the call to the attempt sign in conversation.
The other approach is a rule out method between the Audit traces and the User Data Dump tool.
So let's say you have a baseline document that states all of the Transfer numbers for all users.
If the User Data Dump reflects a different number and the Audit logs do not show any change, starting from the time the baseline was created and the point of time where the number was changed, then you could deduce the change was done via TUI (Telephone User Interface). Unfortunately you wouldn't be able to tell who did the change in this case.
Nevertheless, remember that a user may have for example an Alternate Extension so the change might not necessarily be done from the office phone: "Alternate extensions can make calling Cisco Unity Connection from an alternate device—such as a mobile phone, a home phone, or a phone at another work site—more convenient. When you specify the phone number for an alternative extension, Connection handles all calls from that number in the same way that it handles calls from a primary extension (assuming that ANI or caller ID is passed along to Connection from the phone system). This means that Connection associates the alternate phone number with the user account, and when a call comes from that number, Connection prompts the user to enter a PIN and sign in."
Best regards,
David Rojas
Cisco TAC Support Engineer, Unity
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 1-407- 241-2965 ext 6406
Mon, Wed, and Fri 12:00 pm to 9:00 pm ET, Tue and Thu 8:00 am to 5:00pm ET
Cisco Worldwide Contact link is below for further reference.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_worldwide_contacts.html

Material Determination error during Transaction DP90

Dear Experts,
I am configuring the Depot Repair scenario for a Hitech Industry.
The Process is as follows;
1. Ceating the Notification
2. Creating a repair order using Notificaion. and getting the repaired items in to the plant
3. Creaing and confirming the service order and delivering the repaired product to the customer.
4. Creating a Billing Request using service order during transaction DP90.
I am facing the following error!!! -
Material Determination error in the service order line item xxxxx/xx!!!!!!
I have configured the DIP Profile YBR00099 as below.
The characteristics Activity Number, Activity Type and Cost Elemnt were given the Material Determination Check.
The source is---- " Actual Costs and Line Items " with 100 Percent, No sets are used for the source characteristics.
In the Material Determination a Blank Item is used with a Check for the field " Material Direct"
In the Material Determination Criteria for the Blank Material, it is configured as below;
Activity Type            No Set Used - No Value used
Activity NUmber        No Set Used - No Value used
Cost Element           YBR-Material-01(Set values are 608110 and   * )
Note : the above configuration was done using the Config guide AS IS.
The material that was used in the Service order is not maintained in the ODP1 transaction ---> Material Determination.. instead ,only a blank material is used and configured as above.
The subsequent Process should continue as follows;
5. After saving the billing request, two more line items are determined in the repair order.
6. Debit memo is created using the repair order. where the Actual confirmed hours of service and spare parts confirmed if any are billed for the customer.
Basically I am very much new to this RRB concept and I was facing the above error and could n't be able to proceed further.
Please help me in this regard.
BadariNath .G
Answerthink India Limited, Hyd
9989425075

Material Determination error in the service order line item
Check note 460415 and 545095
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Account determination error for EK02

Hi,
I am using EK02 for unit costing in quotation used specially for PS.
I have assigned EK02 in the quotation doc type and have added the same to the pricing procedure (marked it manual & ststistical) and assigned it SubTotal-B.
It is working perfectly in the quotation but while in Sales Order it is giving account determination error for EK02.
I am unable to understand when there is no account key assigned to it, how is this error ?
Please advise immediately.
Regards,
Rajesh

Check the Requirement class in order - in procurement tab.
when you use the EK02 cost estimation condition type, Controlling documents get generated once you save the sales order.
i.e. the reason, in VKOA for the all the access keys maintained in order pricing procedure, should have valid record with Costing conditon type:KOFK.
maitain entries in table:005- Account key for all the account keys maitained
such as;
Application / Condition type-KOFK/ chart of accounts/ Acct key - G/L account ( here maintain same G/L account which have you assigned with Condition type KOFI)
it will solve your issue.

Accounting Determination Error

Hi,
I am getting the below error message in VF02.
"Account determination error".
Accounting document has not been released yet though SAP billing documentcreated.
Please let me know where the configuration happens.
Thanks
Venkatesh

Hi Venkatesh,
We can determine the GL accounts through access sequence.
Access sequence is nothing but SAP terminology of determing the GL accounts.
Basically the FI- SD integration is for picking up the revenue accounts or the discounts and surcharges.
The account key determines whether it is a revenue or a surcharge or discount.
Actually Goods issue and billing generate account entries.
Goods issue:
Cost of goods sold account                          Dr
Inventary finished goods account                 Cr
Billing:
Customer               Dr
Sales                     Cr
Please check configuration GL account determinations.at VKOA
ERL               Sales revenue
ERS               Sales deductions
MWS             Sales Tax    etc.....
and also please check automatic account determination in OBYC. In OBYC need to maintain offsetting entry.
GBB       -
>              Inventary stock account
I hope you are understand.
Thanks & Regards,
Haribabu Bodapudi

Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "117122"

Hi people,
We have the error:
=====================
Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "117122"
Diagnosis
In Profitability Analysis (CO-PA), the system tried to valuate a line item using the current standard cost estimate.
In order to determine the current plan period, the system needs to read the valuation segment of the material master.
The system has found that the current plan period is not filled forproduct "117122" in plant "UBE1".
We have the follow configuration in trans.: KE40:
. Determine material cost estimate
   . Transf. Standard Cost Estimate
. Costing Variant
. Control Data for Standard Cost Estimate
   . Period Indicator = "Current Standard Cost Estimate acc. to entry in mat master
. Addiitonal data CO-PC
    . Transfer cost estimate in controlling area currency "activated"
We think the reason about our error is because the field above is activated and some configuration more is necessary for this case. For examplo: Trans.: OKYW and this one was not configurated yet.
Do you know what happend?
If we need to configure some transation, or sonly process the cost estimate?
Thanks,
Rosana.

Hello Guido
Thank you very much for your return.
It is happenning in a Client that some people are doing the configuration.
Before we didin't have in KE40, the fiel "Transfer cost estimate in controlling area currency" activated.
And now, the people activate that in this new Client and I don't know the impact about that.
I think we have to make the configuration in OKYW.
The other transation you told me, we don't have any information.
Could you tell me some other idea what happend?
Message error is just "Message no. KE350"
Abou claculate the cost:
It was calculated by trans.: CK11N for future planning and the real wasn't not possible to release because this material already have moviments.
Could you tell us is there is some thing more to do?
Thanks,
Rosana.

CO41: cost determination error and no routing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for