Coldfusion developr version meta tag

I'm using coldfusion developer version. So when i execute a
coldfusion template, there is a meta tag in the source code.
Therefore I can't use coldfusion generated XML data as a Flex data
source. If any one know avoid this problem please help me. I'm
trying to lear flex.
Thank you,
Buddhika

buddhika23 wrote:
> I'm using coldfusion developer version. So when i
execute a coldfusion
> template, there is a meta tag in the source code.
Therefore I can't use
> coldfusion generated XML data as a Flex data source. If
any one know avoid this
> problem please help me. I'm trying to lear flex.
> Thank you,
> Buddhika
>
Do you have the devnet edition? As far as I know the
developer edition
you download from adobe.com doesn't do this, but the old
Macromedia
DevNet edition had this problem. Quickest solution is just to
reinstall
CF using the developer edition that you can download from
adobe.com
Matt
Matt Woodward
[email protected]
Adobe Community Expert - ColdFusion

Similar Messages

How do I add Meta tags to my website

I have produced a website in i web and published it to my .mac account.
I need to know how to add meta tags to get it recognised by the search engines.
The company I am using to do this want the ftp info. As I upload directly to my .mac account I am not sure what they need. Can you help please?

I think I may have a good workaround here, not sure how it will work with .mac as I dont use it, I am in control of my default page within Apache.
Create your site as normal within Iweb and publish it.
Outside of iWeb create your site's real default homepage by hand, that contains the meta tags and that redirects to your iWeb homepage. In this way any Search engine hits to your site will hit the external page first, reading the meta tags then get redirected to your real home page. Not ideal of course but at least you don't have to keep an eye on your metatag's being overwritten by republishing your homepage.
Here is the code from mine, it appears to work:
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://+
+www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title></t+
+itle><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0;url= Welcome.html" />+
+<META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="enter,your,keywords,here">
+<META NAME="description" CONTENT="description of your website">+
</head><body></body></html>
This page will redirect to the "Welcome.html" page created in iWeb.
Hope this helps.
Message was edited by: berrymp

What is the best way to add "meta tags" in edge?

Trying to add meta tags for search engines, what are the best ways to do this?

With the latest version of Edge (3.0) is still the best practice to edit index.html or is there a better one?
Y try for example...
var meta1 = '<meta name="robots" content="index, follow" />';
$(meta1).appendTo("head");
...in creationComplete or in document.compositionReady but I can't see these lines in index.html file, are stored in index_edgeActions.js file.
But maybe that works to attach the meta tags with append to head because it does work fine (and neither are saved in the index.html):
var favicon = "<link rel='shortcut icon' href='images/volicon.png' type='image/png'/>" ;
$(favicon).appendTo("head");
I don't know if Google detect meta tags stored in index_edgeAtions.js or is more recommended to modify index.html manually with notepad.
Maybe the best practice are save and publish Edge project with a name different than index (for example project.an and project.html) and to create an index.html manually with meta tags, code of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, etc., and with HTML meta http-equiv Attribute for to redirect immediately to project.html generate with Edge (remember disallow project.html in robots.txt). In this way is not necessary to modify the index.html file each time that we publish.
How do you see?

Invalid meta tag generated when using XHTML method

Hi,
I'm trying to generate an XHTML file using XSL and the XHTML output method. However, transformation results in adding the following XHTML-invalid meta tag (uppercase and non-closing) in the head tag:
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
Is it a bug in the XDK or am I missing something? Transform is performed using the JXTransformer provided in 11g.
Thanks in advance,
Stephane
input file:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xml:lang='en' lang='en' xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<head>
     <title>Some title</title>
</head>
<body></body>
</html>
xsl file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
     <xsl:output method="xhtml"
doctype-public="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" doctype-system="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"/>
<xsl:template match="*">
     <xsl:element name="{local-name()}" namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
          <xsl:apply-templates />
     </xsl:element>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
output:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
*<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">*
<title>Some title</title></head><body></body></html>

For some reason when I use MapForce tool to generate my xslt mapping source, it is generating the following statement in the xsl file.
     <xsl:namespace-alias stylesheet-prefix="n" result-prefix="#default"/>
So at the root element of XML file, it is replacing the character n with '#default' for some reason, I don;t know the purpose of this.
As you suggested, I changed the name space, still I experienced same problem.
It is now resolved after removing the above xsl statement from the xsl file before creating/uploading the relevant zip file into archives folder.
It works fine now. Thanks for the clue.

Are the META tags in a pdf file visible by search engines?

I have several hundred newsletters in pdf format on a website.
I am in the process of entering META tag information (title,description,keywords) through the Properties panel of each pdf file. Is this information that will be visible by search engines in a WordPress site?
I ask, because every post in WordPress has a place to enter keyword tags. The problem I'm having in WordPress is that every post shows the tag information rather than making it invisible. If the properties information in the pdf file does the same thing, I won't bother with entering it again in WordPress.
Thanks to anyone who might have insight into this question.
Many thanks!

It is a high order probability that your SQL's report generator is creating the PDF, not Acrobat (which by design and EULA cannot be used in as/with server).
That the report generator outputs to an old-old version of PDF bears this out.
Wiki articles on PDF are very nice for those high level intro summaries.
To know / understand PDF you purchase and study the ISO Standard for PDF (ISO 32000-1:2008).
Rather than "PDF validation" you may want to consider addressing the appearent root cause of the problem(s).
You can change the email2fax application to one that can deal with older PDF versions.
You can change the report generator to one that can output to the ISO Standard.
(Perhaps the in-use application can be configured to output to the current version of PDF (i.e., the ISO Standard).
Be well...

Using Web Widgets in iWeb to Create meta tags???

I am using iWeb '08 version 2.0.3
There is a feature in iWeb 08 to add HTML snippets (when you click on the button at the bottom "Web Widgets".
I have added some Meta tags on each of my pages, for example (my keywords & descriptions have different content, this is an example):
<META NAME="Description" CONTENT="this is my description">
<META NAME="Keywords" CONTENT="these are my keywords">
<title>this is my title</title>
<meta name="robots" content="index,follow">
<meta name="GOOGLEBOT" content="INDEX, FOLLOW">
I published to a folder, then pushed the code out to my site. When I view the source code, I do not see any of these tags on any of my pages (I put this on all of my pages).
My question is why is this not showing up? I can certainly add this content via dreamweaver, but that would be a pain as every time I update my site, I would have to publish to a folder and then, in dreamweaver, put the code out there again on each page. What a pain in the a*@!
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Because whatever you add to HTML Snippet is actually added to another page called widget#_markup.html .
iWeb then link this widget#_markup page to the main page with a iframe, this is the same reason why google analytics javascript and statcounter javascript don't track correctly when add in HTML Snippet.
You better off using some scriptable applications or AppleScript to do post editing.

Meta tags and describtion

Will it be SEO friendly if the meta tags and desribtion of the tablet and phone version are similar to the desktop version ?
Thank you

is it possible to take a page from the net e.g by saving site and importing it to iWeb for editing?
No.
http://homepage.mac.com/thgewecke/iwebdata.html

PDF properties (meta tags) can't be changed (error 0x80040154 - class not registered)

Hello,
Changing PDF properties (meta tags: author, title, comment, theme etc) in Adobe Reader as well as in Windows Explorer are disabled rsp does not funtion.
1. In Adobe Reader "File properties", the overwriting rsp insertion of text is disabled in grey.
2. In Windows Explorer, following message window appears: "Properties change: Due to an unexpected error, properties can't be changed - Error 0x80040154: class not registered"
(Sorry for the bad translation, but I am running the German version)
Is there a technical explanation and solution for this problem? In other PDF programms, the change of meta data does work fine.
=====================
Windows 7 64-bit, Acrobat Reader X 10.1.1. (Standard PDF Viewer)
=====================
Many thanks & best regards
adiflis

@MadEyes: I found out you had to set a site address in wordpress the hard way, i set it for a dns host and I couldn't get into the wp-admin page or load any sort of image or css.
At the moment i have a server root directory with a wordpress folder on it. Eg:
(/srv/http)/wp/
and a test index file in the root. Eg:
(/srv/http)/index.html
The index file doesn't show up publicly, but it will on the local network.
I set the apache port back to 61669 and tested with canyouseeme.org. I got (i will email you the ip addy):
Success: I can see your service on X.X.X.X on port (61669) >EDIT: If I close apache, then it fails. Start it back up, it succeeds.
Your ISP is not blocking port 61669
I also nmap'd myself and got this:
Host is up (0.025s latency).
Not shown: 996 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
23/tcp open telnet
5989/tcp open wbem-https
6881/tcp filtered bittorrent-tracker
8080/tcp open http-proxy
A port forward is definitely set up, so i dont know how much I can trust this (I did make 6881, but them program isn't open).
Any of this any help?
>EDIT: Excerpt from Webmin: "System hostname localhost.localdomain" this doesn't seem right.
Localhost:
#<ip-address> <hostname.domain.org> <hostname>
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost ablanck
#::1 ablanck.localdomain localhost
Last edited by lucytheboydog (2011-02-07 04:34:24)

Base meta tag not working

We have a trial version of Dreamweaver CS3. Up to this point,
we've been using MS FrontPage.
We have a standard meta tag in our header that looks like
this:
<BASE HREF="
http://myURL/">
This code allows the page to complete relational links so
that, for instance, our styles from our stylesheet are brought into
the page while we're editing it. However, while this code works
fine in FrontPage, it isn't working in Dreamweaver. We have to use
absolute paths to link to all images, media, linked pages, etc.,
for Dreamweaver to render them.
I should add that when we edit pages, they are on a server
that isn't a web server (no IIS). But this lack doesn't bother
FrontPage.
Anyone know what's going on here? I suspect it's an easy fix,
but if it isn't, then we probably won't be buying
Dreamweaver.

I have never used or heard of the base meta tag and I have
never had any problems using relational links in Dreamweaver. Not
sure what could be causing your problems. Can you post a sample of
code or a link?
J

Can a website's viewport meta tag be over-ridden in Firefox?

I'm hoping there's an add-on to override viewport meta tags. I checked about:config and didn't see anything relevant.
A website I use, tumblr, does no browser version checking, and mis-uses the viewport setting to apply a value of "960" to every device. Since my laptop's browser window is 1230 actual pixels, the tumblr webpage is stretched out, which makes images look terrible.
Their viewport tag minus the lesser/greater symbols:
meta name="viewport" content="width=960" id="viewport"
I'd like to override their viewport tag completely, as if it did not exist, or substitute one with <i>content=”width=device-width, initial-scale=1”</i> so I'll have a 1-to-1 pixel ratio.
Not much hope of getting tumblr to stop treating all devices the same; their code to get the language version from browsers for font settings has been broken for years. I have reported the viewport problem to tumblr support, however.
I'm using Firefox 25.0.1 for Windows (Vista).

I'm sorry that no one replied to your question.
If you're looking for a Firefox add-on, you can search through addons.mozilla.org or ask a question on the Mozilla Add-ons forum, which is here:
* https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/

Meta tagging audio files in os x

hi, I have just moved from MS to Apple. In MS I used to input important meta tags for mp3files (my own) via "info". When I chose info on OS X my only option is to use the field for Spotlight commentaries. But since I want to fill inn composer, year and so forth this seems to be to little.

once your mp3 are in the itunes LIBRARY then you choose command + i to enter your own information. Once this is done go to advanced and convert the id3 tag to version 2.4
You can also select a multiple number of files to do some of the information ; just experiment with it. Oh BTW if you are successful and id3 tag your files remember to copy these over to your older mp3 files where ever you have them stored and most of the information after you id3 tag them will go with the copy.

How do I add multiple scripts from search engines to my meta tag properties?

I currently have copied the goolge script for website varification and analytics, etc and pasted it into my meta tag properties dialog box. There is no problem as far as Google varifying the page. However, I would like to copy Bing's search engine script into my meta tag in addition to Googles script. How do I go about doing this? Do I hit the return on my keyboard under the ending of Googles script, then paste in the Bing script?
The the last part of the Google script ending in this:
</script>
(paste new script from Bing here?)
Will this cancel out each other and cause problems?
Can someone walk me through this process, because Bing's search engine will not varify my site through two of the three other methods.
Ben

Adding a script after the closure of previous script is the way to go i.e. right after the </script> tag.
So it should look something like below:
<script>
Google's script
</script>
<script>
Bing's script
</script>
Cannot comment on one interfering with the other since it really depends on what exact code is there in the scripts. Google and Bing help resources will be able to help more with this.
Thanks,
Vikas

Adding meta tags to published web site

I have created my website using iWeb and subsequently downloaded the RAVE SEO tool and used it to add for meta tags to my sites (description and keywords).
I followed this procedure:
1) I published my site from iWeb to a local folder on my iMac
2) I added the meta tags using the RAVE SEO tool
3) I tried to publish the site to my webhotel with tags added using the ftp tool in the RAVE SEO tool.
PROBLEM:
when I publish from the SEO tool, it is the old sites which are published. In my local folder where I started out publishing the web site to, I can see that the tags from description and keywords have been added. But the site which is published does not contain the tags.
I have a feeling that the SEO tool is looking in a wrong foder, but I cannot change the folder using the "FTP Details" funktion in the SEO tool.
Do anyone have a suggestion for what to do?
Thanks,
Klaus

I have a feeling that the SEO tool is looking in a wrong foder, but I cannot change the folder using the "FTP Details" funktion in the SEO tool.
When you click publish and choose FTP you can create a new setup or use an existing one.
And if you do not know which folder to publish to, click browse. You decide.
!http://www.wyodor.net/_Discussions/SEOToolFTP.png!
Message was edited by: Wyodor

Can't get a web page to validate with meta tags with w3c??

I have created a website for my school projects, and every week I have to add something to it for the course, and every monday I have to submit my code in a zipped folder to the professor, after running it through the w3c validation page, and passing, This current week, I was instructed to swork on SEO for my site, and add meta tags to the site to fish for traffic, and then I have to validate it through w3c and submit. Well, I did not complete this because w3c would not validate my page until I removed every single meta tag from the code, and I cannot for the life of me understand the error that is holding me back. So, in an effort to see if I could get some help here, I have included my code, and will try to explain what is happening and the code as well as the error from the validator service. Please have a look, help me, because I am totally lost here....
Thanks in advance!!
zlloyd1
This is my code:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>zlloyd on the web</title><meta name="" content="Zachariah Lloyd, basketball, computers" /><meta fttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="stylez.css" />
</head>
<body><div id="container"><h1>ZLLOYD ON THE WEB</h1> <div id="navbar"><a href="about.html">About me</a> <a href="OceanView.html">Ocean View</a> <a href="swimming.html">Swimming</a> <a href="gaming.html">Gaming</a> <a href="BBall.html">Basketball</a></div><div><a href="gaming.html"><img src="images/Gaming-Desktop-Configuration.jpg" width="107" height="239" alt="console" /></a><a href="BBall.html"><img src="images/300px-Basketball_pictogram.svg.png" width="82" height="76" alt="BallinGuy" /></a><a href="swimming.html"><img src="images/swimming.jpg" width="100" height="237" alt="Strokin" /></a></div></div>
<a href="contactsupport.html">Support </a>
</body>
</html>
and this is what w3c says when I try to validate the page:
Line 5, Column 131: there is no attribute "fttp-equiv"
…mputers, swimming" /><meta fttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; chars…
✉
You have used the attribute named above in your document, but the document type you are using does not support that attribute for this element. This error is often caused by incorrect use of the "Strict" document type with a document that uses frames (e.g. you must use the "Transitional" document type to get the "target" attribute), or by using vendor proprietary extensions such as "marginheight" (this is usually fixed by using CSS to achieve the desired effect instead).
This error may also result if the element itself is not supported in the document type you are using, as an undefined element will have no supported attributes; in this case, see the element-undefined error message for further information.
How to fix: check the spelling and case of the element and attribute, (Remember XHTML is all lower-case) and/or check that they are both allowed in the chosen document type, and/or use CSS instead of this attribute. If you received this error when using the <embed> element to incorporate flash media in a Web page, see the FAQ item on valid flash.
What in the world does this mean, because I am seriously lost on this, and the only way I could get around this was to completely remove the entire line, "<meta name="" content="Zachariah Lloyd, basketball, computers" /><meta fttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />", which removed all of my meta tags completely, in order to validate it?? I cannot see what is setting this thing off like that, I have never gottena validation error before, and I now know that they are written as meaningless gibberish that does not even remotely explain what is wrong, at least not to me....
Please help!!!!

Line 4 and line 5 are trying to do the same thing. Take out the
<meta fttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
line entirely and you will be good.

How do I add Meta tags to pages?

Is it possible to add meta tag information for the pages (such as keywords, description, robots, etc.) directly in Muse?
I'd like to add meta tag data to describe the page to help with search engine optimization.

I found a lot of useful information on here: http://www.muse-themes.com/blogs/news/6103624-seo-in-adobe-muse-search-engine-optimization #comments
However I would like to know: If you have multiple pages dealing with different topics does one need to adjust the meta-data accordingly for each page.
For example, I am redoing a website for a small earthmoving contractor who offers a range of services including new lawn installation (NOT mowing!), drainage, landscaping, post hole boring, driveways - to name a few; these are essentially the main pages with content explaining each service a little further.
So would I be correct in assuming I should have a unique description, keywords and (obviously) page title for each page?
How about the home page? Should the metadata attempt to cover all services offered within the website as a whole, or just the content of the home page?
Thanks in advance!

Coldfusion developr version meta tag

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for