Command object locks table (TX)

Im having locking probmlems with ODP.NET. Im updating same table with many connections in many threads. I get table locks for hours (over 24 hours) and I cant find any timout to set. The CommandTimeout on the Command object is not implemented.
In the V$Lock table I can see two locks on the same table made by two session ids from the same computer.
Im using transactions on the Connection object.
How do I set a timout for the update so that the lock will dissapear?
String connString = "Data Source="     + dsn + ";"
          + "User ID="          + user + ";"
          + "Password="          + pwd;
OracleConnection conn = new OracleConnection(connString);
String sql = "UPDATE ABDATA2 SET ABNAVN='SOLNA STAD ' WHERE OBJID = -21805738";
OracleCommand command = new OracleCommand(sql, m_conn);
//command.CommandTimeout = 60000; Exists but not supported
command.ExecuteNonQuery();
Is there anyone who has a clue?

Hi Neo, thanks for responding;
I did not publish the report with saved data, and I'm not sure what you mean about appending the string value? Could you explain that part?
The parameter I created is only declared as a string with no default value with a name of "CodeTableName". I used the Create paramter button you have in the Command object window to make it.
I then added the parameter name to my SQL statement as listed above.
The actual code table names in the database is actually longer then what the parameter calls for. They all start with "TIBURON.ZZ_" and end with "_Codes". I didn't want the users to have to remember the full names so that's why the SQL statement shows those additional parts.
The report works perfect when I'm running this report from Crystal Reports 9 or CR11 itself. It's only when I upload the report to our web server that the users isn't provided a prompt to enter a parameter. They only have button labed "Run Report".
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Joe

Similar Messages

Lock object for table KNVP and KNVK

Hello Friends,
Can you please tell me the standard lock object for the table KNVP and KNVK.
Thank and regards,
Kuldeep

Hi
see this and do accordingly
Lock objects are use in SAP to avoid the inconsistancy at the time of data is being insert/change into database.
SAP Provide three type of Lock objects.
- Read Lock(Shared Locked)
protects read access to an object. The read lock allows other transactions read access but not write access to
the locked area of the table
- Write Lock(exclusive lock)
protects write access to an object. The write lock allows other transactions neither read nor write access to
the locked area of the table.
- Enhanced write lock (exclusive lock without cumulating)
works like a write lock except that the enhanced write lock also protects from further accesses from the
same transaction.
You can create a lock on a object of SAP thorugh transaction SE11 and enter any meaningful name start with EZ Example EZTEST_LOCK.
Use: you can see in almost all transaction when you are open an object in Change mode SAP could not allow to any other user to open the same object in change mode.
Example: in HR when we are enter a personal number in master data maintainance screen SAP can't allow to any other user to use same personal number for changes.
Technicaly:
When you create a lock object System automatically creat two function module.
1. ENQUEUE_<Lockobject name>. to insert the object in a queue.
2. DEQUEUE_<Lockobject name>. To remove the object is being queued through above FM.
You have to use these function module in your program.
check this link for example.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/cf/21eea5446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
tables:vbak.
call function 'ENQUEUE_EZLOCK3'
exporting
mode_vbak = 'E'
mandt = sy-mandt
vbeln = vbak-vbeln
X_VBELN = ' '
_SCOPE = '2'
_WAIT = ' '
_COLLECT = ' '
EXCEPTIONS
FOREIGN_LOCK = 1
SYSTEM_FAILURE = 2
OTHERS = 3
if sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
endif.
Normally ABAPers will create the Lock objects, because we know when to lock and how to lock and where to lock the Object then after completing our updations we unlock the Objects in the Tables
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/cf/21eea5446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
purpose: If multiple user try to access a database object, inconsistency may occer. To avoid that inconsistency and to let multiple user give the accessibility of the database objects the locking mechanism is used.
Steps: first we create a loc object in se11 . Suppose for a table mara. It will create two functional module.:
1. enque_lockobject
1. deque_lockobject
before updating any table first we lock the table by calling enque_lockobject fm and then after updating we release the lock by deque_lockobject.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cf/21eea5446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
GO TO SE11
Select the radio button "Lock object"..
Give the name starts with EZ or EY..
Example: EYTEST
Press Create button..
Give the short description..
Example: Lock object for table ZTABLE..
In the tables tab..Give the table name..
Example: ZTABLE
Save and generate..
Your lock object is now created..You can see the LOCK MODULES..
In the menu ..GOTO -> LOCK MODULES..There you can see the ENQUEUE and DEQUEUE function
Lock objects:
http://www.sap-img.com/abap/type-and-uses-of-lock-objects-in-sap.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/cf/21eea5446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
Match Code Objects:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/41/f6b237fec48c67e10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
http://searchsap.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid21_gci553386,00.html
See this link:
http://www.sap-img.com/abap/type-and-uses-of-lock-objects-in-sap.htm
Check these links -
lock objects
Lock Objects
Lock Objects
Regards
Anji

Set Table Location for Reports(Command Objects)

Hi SAP Gems,
I would like to thank TED,Merry,Jonathan, Shawn, and all the developers contributing to this community.
I would really appreciate any help on following question:
1. I have a report designed in CR 2008 against DB2(JDBC Connectivity).
2. The report is working fine in the designer.
3. There are five sub reports in the main report.
4. The main report doesnt have any command object however every child/sub report has command object with paramaters.
5. Every subreport is linked.
6. I would like to change runtime datasource location for this report using CRJ 2.0 SDK'S.( from AIX to Windows BOX)
7. Both BOX's have same database schema.
8. I am able to view the report in the jsp page using SDK's, however "set table location doesnt works and prompts me the error:
com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.lib.ReportSDKException: Unexpected database connector error---- Error code:-2147467259 Error code name:failed
*There is no problem with the code because the sample code is taken from sdn.sap as it is and it works for other report without subreport and command objects.
I tried using the following code piece but again same problem.
if(table instanceof com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.data.CommandTable)
                    IProcedure command = (IProcedure)table;
                    ParameterField commandParam = (ParameterField) command.getParameters().get(0);
                    Values values = new Values();
                    ParameterFieldDiscreteValue pfdv = new ParameterFieldDiscreteValue();
                    pfdv.setValue("ANTON");
                    values.add(pfdv);
                    commandParam.setCurrentValues(values);
I would like to know if I dont want to set the command level param using:
ParameterField commandParam = (ParameterField) command.getParameters().get(0);
                    Values values = new Values();
                    ParameterFieldDiscreteValue pfdv = new ParameterFieldDiscreteValue();
                    pfdv.setValue("ANTON");
                    values.add(pfdv);
                    commandParam.setCurrentValues(values);
would the parameter would be prompted automatically?
how do I find what paramaeter to set and how ?
Regards,
Jonathan Roy

Hi ,
Can any one help please?
Ted !! I would really appreciate an answer from you.
Regards,
Jon

Issue: Lock table is out of available object entries

Hi all,
We have a method to add records into BDB, and after there are more than 10000 records, if we continue add records into BDB, such as add 400 records into BDB, then do other update/add operation to BDB, it will be failed.
The error message is Lock table is out of available object entries.
How to resolve it?
Thanks.
Jane.

Frist the BDB stat as bellow:
1786 Last allocated locker ID
0x7fffffff Current maximum unused locker ID
9 Number of lock modes
2000 Maximum number of locks possible
2000 Maximum number of lockers possible
2000 Maximum number of lock objects possible
52 Number of current locks
1959 Maximum number of locks at any one time
126 Number of current lockers
136 Maximum number of lockers at any one time
26 Number of current lock objects
1930 Maximum number of lock objects at any one time
21M Total number of locks requested (21397151)
21M Total number of locks released (21397099)
0 Total number of lock requests failing because DB_LOCK_NOWAIT was set
0 Total number of locks not immediately available due to conflicts
0 Number of deadlocks
0 Lock timeout value
0 Number of locks that have timed out
0 Transaction timeout value
0 Number of transactions that have timed out
736KB The size of the lock region
0 The number of region locks that required waiting (0%)
Then I run the method to insert 29 records into BDB, the BDB isn't locked yet, and the stat:
1794 Last allocated locker ID
0x7fffffff Current maximum unused locker ID
9 Number of lock modes
2000 Maximum number of locks possible
2000 Maximum number of lockers possible
2000 Maximum number of lock objects possible
52 Number of current locks
1959 Maximum number of locks at any one time
134 Number of current lockers
136 Maximum number of lockers at any one time
26 Number of current lock objects
1930 Maximum number of lock objects at any one time
22M Total number of locks requested (22734514)
22M Total number of locks released (22734462)
0 Total number of lock requests failing because DB_LOCK_NOWAIT was set
0 Total number of locks not immediately available due to conflicts
0 Number of deadlocks
0 Lock timeout value
0 Number of locks that have timed out
0 Transaction timeout value
0 Number of transactions that have timed out
736KB The size of the lock region
0 The number of region locks that required waiting (0%)
Then I run the method again to insert records, the issue "Lock table is out of available locks" occur, and the BDB stat:
1795 Last allocated locker ID
0x7fffffff Current maximum unused locker ID
9 Number of lock modes
2000 Maximum number of locks possible
2000 Maximum number of lockers possible
2000 Maximum number of lock objects possible
52 Number of current locks
2000 Maximum number of locks at any one time
135 Number of current lockers
137 Maximum number of lockers at any one time
27 Number of current lock objects
1975 Maximum number of lock objects at any one time
26M Total number of locks requested (26504607)
26M Total number of locks released (26504553)
0 Total number of lock requests failing because DB_LOCK_NOWAIT was set
0 Total number of locks not immediately available due to conflicts
0 Number of deadlocks
0 Lock timeout value
0 Number of locks that have timed out
0 Transaction timeout value
0 Number of transactions that have timed out
736KB The size of the lock region
0 The number of region locks that required waiting (0%)
Why this issue occur and how to resolve this issue.
Thanks very much.
Jane

Lock table is out of available object entries

hi,
i am using db4.6.21 version.
i have created an table where other applications writes to this tables concurrently.
this table opened in DB_THREAD and every application writing in DB_WRITE_CURSOR mode. and i am note using any Locking subsystems.only READ_COMMITTED and DB_WRITE_CURSOR are used by applications to access the table.
while In PC it is working properly.
But in At91SAM9260EK with kerenl 2.6.23.9 ,
Berkeley DB error: Lock table is out of available object entries
error comes...what would be the reason..???

Hi Ratheesh,
Please search through the forum; similar locking subsystem configuration issues have already been discussed.
In short, you'll need to increase the number of lock objects:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/ref/lock/max.html
I see you're using the DB_WRITECURSOR flag which is specific to CDS (Concurrent Data Store), so you should size the locking subsystem appropriately to CDS: the number of lock objects needed is two per open database (one for the database lock, and one for the cursor lock when the DB_CDB_ALLDB option is not specified). The locking subsystem configuration should be similar for all the processes accessing the environment, or not specified for the processes that just join the environment.
If you still see this error message reported, provide some information on your OS/platform, information on how the processes access the environment and the locking statistics (db_stat -N -Co -h <env_dir>).
Regards,
Andrei

Using a Variable in SSIS - Error - "Command text was not set for the command object.".

Hi All,
I am using a OLE DB Source in my dataflow component and want to select SQL Query from the master table I have created variables v_Archivequery
String packageLevel (to store the query).
<Variable Name="V_Archivequery" DataType="String">
     SELECT a.*, b.BBxKey as Archive_BBxKey, b.RowChecksum as Archive_RowChecksum
     FROM dbo.ImportBBxFbcci a LEFT OUTER JOIN Archive.dbo.ArchiveBBxFbcci b
     ON (SUBSTRING(a.Col001,1,4) + SUBSTRING(a.Col002,1,10)) = b.BBxKey
     Where (b.LatestVersion = 1 OR b.LatestVersion IS NULL)
    </Variable>
I am assigning this query to the v_Archivequery variable, "SELECT a.*, b.BBxKey as Archive_BBxKey, b.RowChecksum as Archive_RowChecksum
FROM dbo.ImportBBxFbcci a LEFT OUTER JOIN Archive.dbo.ArchiveBBxFbcci b
ON (SUBSTRING(a.Col001,1,4) + SUBSTRING(a.Col002,1,10)) = b.BBxKey
Where (b.LatestVersion = 1 OR b.LatestVersion IS NULL)"
Now in the OLE Db source, I have selected as Sql Command from Variable, and I am getting the variable, v_Archivequery .
But when I am generating the package and when running I am getting bewlo errror
Error at Data Flow Task [OLE DB Source [1]]: An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80040E0C.
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "Microsoft SQL Native Client" Hresult: 0x80040E0C Description: "Command text was not set for the command object.".
Can Someone guide me whr am going wrong?
Please let me know where am going wrong?
Thanks in advance.
Thankx & regards, Vipin jha MCP

What happens if you hit Preview button in OLE DB Source Editor? Also you can use the same query by selecting SQL Command option and test.
Could you try set the Delay Validation = True at Package and re-run ?
If set the query in variable expression (not in value), then Set Evaluate As Expression = True.
-Vaibhav Chaudhari

Creating a LOV by using a Command Object

Hello All,
I have a report that's driven by a parameterized sproc, which is a year parameter. However, we have a table that I would like to use in my object command to populate this parameter with the values from the select statement to enforce consistency. A new year is inserted into to this table yearly by another process, which would keep me from having to go into a static list to update the year options yearly.
I've created the command object and saved it to the repository, but I can't figure out how to associate it to the report as the parameter.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Thanks in advance.

hi DevinM,
two choices:
A) add the Command to your report
1) you can add the Command to your report...don't link it to any tables though...you'll get a "Generally not supported error" but you can ignore it for this test
2) now in your prompt you will have the Command available for the dynamic values
3) check that the number of records on your report remains the same as before...it should...any test i have run on this is aok
B) create a Business View
1) go into the Business View Manager and create a business view from the data foundation up
2) once you've got the business view built you can create an LOV from there which is available to your current report and all other reports
jw

Problem creating a SQL command object and adding it to a Crystal report

Hi,
I'm trying to add the following SQL command object with the following sql for MYSQL 5.1
SELECT lic.id, lic.productionname, comp.companyname, lic.paymentreceiveddate, lic.licenseissuedate,
IFNULL((SELECT sum(licsong.feequoted) from licensesong licsong where licsong.licenseid = lic.id), 0) as totalfeequoted,
IFNULL((SELECT sum(licsong.feetax) from licensesong licsong where licsong.licenseid = lic.id), 0) as totalfeetax,
IFNULL((SELECT sum(licsong.feequoted + licsong.feetax) from licensesong licsong where licsong.licenseid = lic.id), 0) as totalfee,
IFNULL((SELECT sum(pay.fullamount) from payment pay where pay.licenseid = lic.id),0) as totalpaid
FROM license lic
INNER JOIN company comp on lic.licensecompanyid= comp.id;
This sql runs fine in the Query Browser of mysql and returns what I want.
When I try to add this SQL command to a new Crystal Report, (by right clicking in the sql editor and selecting Crystal Reports - Add to new Crystal Report), it locks up my Eclipses and it ends up not responding. If I just do a simple SELECT * FROM license it works fine.
The Eclipse I'm using is from the CR4E download page with the crystal plugin already installed.
Any help with this would be greatful, as I am not having much joy with this CR4E 2.0 with MySQL and may have to scrap it and go back creating reports in Apache POI.
Any help greatly received.
Kind regards

Hi,
Try to select a particular columns instead of doing SELECT * FROM license.
Thanks,
Saravanakumar

How to Create an Alert on a V$Lock Table

Hi Gurus,
Can anyone help me out on. how to create an event alert on locks table (V$LOCK). so that whenever a table is locked , i can send the email notificaiton to the user regarding the locking history.
any approach is highly appreciable.

Hi,
as event alerts in eBS in fact are based on trigger concept and it's not allowed to
create triggers on objects owned by SYS i don't think that this will be possible.
Regards

SQL Command Object

We are in the process of migrating reports from SSRS to Crystal 2011.
In SSRS we are able to paste complex SQL into reports as the data source for the report (e.g. multiple CTE's, correlated subqueries, temp tables, etc).
It appears that we can accomplish the same thing using Crystal command objects, but the reports created have to be distributed as stand-alone rpt files to customers. In that case the reports that use sql commands return an error that the command object does not exist. It seems the command object exists in the data connection (which is generated at run-time in the host application) and not in the rpt file itself.
Is it possible to somehow use an sql query as the data source in the report in a manner that is independent of the data connection?
Thanks

Hi,
That's interesting, the query shouldn't be stored in the data connection. It should be saved inside the rpt as part of the SQL Query.
How are you distributing the reports?
How is your application connecting the reports to the database?
As long as the reports logon to the tables and objects used in the SQL Command exist on the database it should run without a problem.
As a test, open the report in Crystal and go to Database | Show SQL Query. You should see your SQL Command there. Copy and paste the SQL into your production database and see if it runs.
Good luck,
Brian

MM42 change material, split valuation at batch level, M301, locking table

Dear All,
I'm working on ECC 6.0 retail and I have activated split valuation at batch level. Now in MBEW for this specific material I have almost 14.400 entries.
If I try to change some material data (MM42) I receive an error message M3021 A system error has occurred while locking and then Lock table overflow.
I used SM12 to see the table (while MM42 is still running) and it seems that MBEW is the problem.
What should I do? For any material modification the system has to modify every entry in MBEW? Is there any possibility to skip this?
Thank you.

Hi,
Symptom
Key word: Enqueue
FM: A system error has occurred in the block handler
Message in the syslog: lock table overflowed
Other terms
M3021 MM02 F5 288 F5288 FBRA
Reason and Prerequisites
The lock table has overflowed.
Cause 1: Dimensions of the lock table are too small
Cause 2: The update lags far behind or has shut down completely, so that the lock entries of the update requests that are not yet updated cause the lock table to overflow.
Cause 3: Poor design of the application programs. A lock is issued for each object in an application program, for example a collective run with many objects.
Solution
Determine the cause:
SM12 -> Goto -> Diagnosis (old)
SM12 -> Extras -> Diagnosis (new)
checks the effectiveness of the lock management
SM12 -> Goto -> Diagnosis in update (old)
SM12 -> Extras -> Diagnosis in update (new)
checks the effectiveness of the lock management in conjunction with updates
SM12 -> OkCode TEST -> Error handling -> Statistics (old, only in the enqueue server)
SM12 -> Extras -> Statistics (new)
shows the statistics of the lock management, including the previous maximum fill levels (peak usage) of the partial tables in the lock table
If the owner table overflows, cause 2 generally applies.
In the alert monitor (RZ20), an overrunning of the (customizable) high-water marks is detected and displayed as an alert reason.
The size of the lock table can be set with the profile parameter u201Cenque/table_size =u201C. specifies the size of the lock table in kilobytes. The setting must be made in the profile of the enqueue server ( u2026_DVEBM.. ). The change only takes effect after the restart of the enqueue server.
The default size is 500 KB in the Rel 3.1x implementation of the enqueue table. The resulting sizes for the individual tables are:
Owner table: approx 560.
Name table: approx 560.
Entry table: approx 2240.
As of Rel 4.xx the new implementation of the lock table takes effect.
It can also be activated as described in note 75144 for the 3.1I kernel. The default size is 2000 KB. The resulting sizes for the individual tables are:
Owner table: approx 5400
Name table: approx 5400
Entry table: approx 5400
Example: with the
u201Cenque/table_size =32000u2033 profile parameter, the size of the enqueue table is set to 32000 KB. The tables can then have approx 40,000 entries.
Note that the above sizes and numbers depend on various factors such as the kernel release, patch number, platform, address length (32/64-bit), and character width (Ascii/Unicode). Use the statistics display in SM12 to check the actual capacity of the lock table.
If cause 2 applies, an enlargement of the lock table only delays the overflow of the lock table, but it cannot generally be avoided.
In this case you need to eliminate the update shutdown or accelerate the throughput of the update program using more update processes. Using CCMS (operation modes, see training BC120) the category of work processes can be switched at runtime, for example an interactive work process can be converted temporarily into an update process, to temporarily increase the throughput of the update.
For cause 3, you should consider a tuning of the task function. Instead of issuing a large number of individual locks, it may be better to use generic locks (wildcard) to block a complete subarea. This will also allow you to considerably improve the performance.

MySQL lock table size Exception

Hi,
Our users get random error pages from vibe/tomcat (Error 500).
If the user tries it again, it works without an error.
here are some errors from catalina.out:
Code:
2013-07-31 06:23:12,225 WARN [http-8080-8] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - SQL Error: 1206, SQLState: HY000
2013-07-31 06:23:12,225 ERROR [http-8080-8] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
2013-07-31 06:23:12,242 WARN [http-8080-8] [org.kablink.teaming.web.portlet.handler.LogContextInfoInterceptor] - Action request URL [http://vibe.*******.ch/ssf/a/do?p_name=ss_forum&p_action=1&entryType=4028828f3f0ed66d013f0f3ff208013d&binderId=2333&action=add_folder_entry&vibeonprem_url=1] for user [kablink,ro]
2013-07-31 06:23:12,245 WARN [http-8080-8] [org.kablink.teaming.spring.web.portlet.DispatcherPortlet] - Handler execution resulted in exception - forwarding to resolved error view
org.springframework.dao.InvalidDataAccessApiUsageException: object references an unsaved transient instance - save the transient instance before flushing: org.kablink.teaming.domain.FolderEntry; nested exception is org.hibernate.TransientObjectException: object references an unsaved transient instance - save the transient instance before flushing: org.kablink.teaming.domain.FolderEntry
at org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.SessionFactoryUtils.convertHibernateAccessException(SessionFactoryUtils.java:654)
at org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateAccessor.convertHibernateAccessException(HibernateAccessor.java:412)
at org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTemplate.doExecute(HibernateTemplate.java:411)
2013-07-31 06:23:36,474 ERROR [Sitescape_QuartzSchedulerThread] [org.quartz.core.ErrorLogger] - An error occured while scanning for the next trigger to fire.
org.quartz.JobPersistenceException: Couldn't acquire next trigger: The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size [See nested exception: java.sql.SQLException: The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size]
at org.quartz.impl.jdbcjobstore.JobStoreSupport.acquireNextTrigger(JobStoreSupport.java:2794)
at org.quartz.impl.jdbcjobstore.JobStoreSupport$36.execute(JobStoreSupport.java:2737)
at org.quartz.impl.jdbcjobstore.JobStoreSupport.executeInNonManagedTXLock(JobStoreSupport.java:3768)
at org.quartz.impl.jdbcjobstore.JobStoreSupport.acquireNextTrigger(JobStoreSupport.java:2733)
at org.quartz.core.QuartzSchedulerThread.run(QuartzSchedulerThread.java:264)
Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.createSQLException(SQLError.java:946)
at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.checkErrorPacket(MysqlIO.java:2870)
at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sendCommand(MysqlIO.java:1573)
at com.mysql.jdbc.ServerPreparedStatement.serverExecute(ServerPreparedStatement.java:1169)
2013-07-31 06:27:12,463 WARN [Sitescape_Worker-8] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - SQL Error: 1206, SQLState: HY000
2013-07-31 06:27:12,463 ERROR [Sitescape_Worker-8] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
2013-07-31 06:27:12,463 ERROR [Sitescape_Worker-8] [org.jbpm.graph.def.GraphElement] - action threw exception: Hibernate operation: could not execute update query; uncategorized SQLException for SQL [update SS_ChangeLogs set owningBinderKey=?, owningBinderId=? where (entityId in (? , ?)) and entityType=?]; SQL state [HY000]; error code [1206]; The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size; nested exception is java.sql.SQLException: The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
org.springframework.jdbc.UncategorizedSQLException: Hibernate operation: could not execute update query; uncategorized SQLException for SQL [update SS_ChangeLogs set owningBinderKey=?, owningBinderId=? where (entityId in (? , ?)) and entityType=?]; SQL state [HY000]; error code [1206]; The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size; nested exception is java.sql.SQLException: The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
at org.springframework.jdbc.support.AbstractFallbackSQLExceptionTranslator.translate(AbstractFallbackSQLExceptionTranslator.java:83)
at org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateAccessor.convertJdbcAccessException(HibernateAccessor.java:424)
2013-07-31 06:27:22,393 INFO [CT-kablink] [org.kablink.teaming.lucene.LuceneProvider] - (kablink) Committed, firstOpTimeSinceLastCommit=1375251142310, numberOfOpsSinceLastCommit=12. It took 82.62174 milliseconds
2013-07-31 06:28:22,686 INFO [Sitescape_Worker-9] [org.kablink.teaming.jobs.CleanupJobListener] - Removing job send-email.sendMail-1375252102500
2013-07-31 06:29:51,309 INFO [Sitescape_Worker-10] [org.kablink.teaming.jobs.CleanupJobListener] - Removing job send-email.sendMail-1375252191099
2013-07-31 06:32:08,820 WARN [http-8080-2] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - SQL Error: 1206, SQLState: HY000
2013-07-31 06:32:08,820 ERROR [http-8080-2] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
2013-07-31 06:32:10,775 WARN [http-8080-1] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - SQL Error: 1206, SQLState: HY000
2013-07-31 06:32:10,775 ERROR [http-8080-1] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
2013-07-31 06:32:12,305 WARN [http-8080-1] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - SQL Error: 1206, SQLState: HY000
2013-07-31 06:32:12,305 ERROR [http-8080-1] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
2013-07-31 06:32:14,605 WARN [http-8080-3] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - SQL Error: 1206, SQLState: HY000
2013-07-31 06:32:14,606 ERROR [http-8080-3] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
2013-07-31 06:32:16,056 WARN [http-8080-3] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - SQL Error: 1206, SQLState: HY000
2013-07-31 06:32:16,056 ERROR [http-8080-3] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
2013-07-31 06:32:24,166 WARN [http-8080-1] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - SQL Error: 1206, SQLState: HY000
2013-07-31 06:32:24,166 ERROR [http-8080-1] [org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter] - The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
2013-07-31 06:32:24,167 WARN [http-8080-1] [org.kablink.teaming.spring.web.portlet.DispatcherPortlet] - Handler execution resulted in exception - forwarding to resolved error view
org.springframework.jdbc.UncategorizedSQLException: Hibernate flushing: could not insert: [org.kablink.teaming.domain.AuditTrail]; uncategorized SQLException for SQL [insert into SS_AuditTrail (zoneId, startDate, startBy, endBy, endDate, entityType, entityId, owningBinderId, owningBinderKey, description, transactionType, fileId, applicationId, deletedFolderEntryFamily, type, id) values (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, 'A', ?)]; SQL state [HY000]; error code [1206]; The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size; nested exception is java.sql.SQLException: The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size
at org.springframework.jdbc.support.AbstractFallbackSQLExceptionTranslator.translate(AbstractFallbackSQLExceptionTranslator.java:83)
at org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager.convertJdbcAccessException(HibernateTransactionManager.java:805)
at org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager.convertHibernateAccessException(HibernateTransactionManager.java:791)
at org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateTransactionManager.doCommit(HibernateTransactionManager.java:664)
It always logs the Mysql error code 1206:
MySQL :: MySQL 5.4 Reference Manual :: 13.6.12.1 InnoDB Error Codes
1206 (ER_LOCK_TABLE_FULL)
The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size. To avoid this error, increase the value of innodb_buffer_pool_size.
The value of innodb_buffer_pool_size is set to 8388608 (8MB) on my server.
In the documentation (MySQL :: MySQL 5.4 Reference Manual :: 13.6.3 InnoDB Startup Options and System Variables) it says that the default is 128MB.
Can i set the value to 134217728 (128MB) or will this cause other problems? Will this setting solve my problem?
Thanks for your help.

I already found an entry from Kablink:
https://kablink.org/ssf/a/c/p_name/s...beonprem_url/1
But i think this can't be a permanent solution...
Our MySQL Server version is 5.0.95 running on sles11

Addition of Command based Custom table removes 'Distinct' keyword in Query

Hi,
I use 'Command' Object in 'Datbase Expert' to create 'Custom Tables' and use these tables to fetch LoVs. Addition of 'Command' Object is changing the existing Query and the only change is 'Distinct' in the Query got eliminated and showing 210 recirds instead of Just 10. I did not link this Custom table with any of the tables. If I delete this again the query showing only distinct values eliminating duplicates. Please help.
Edited by: Nanda Kishore B on Jul 16, 2010 12:36 PM

Nanda,
My guess would be that you've placed one of the fields from the LOV Command somewhere on your report. The fact that the LOV Command isn't linked to any of the other tables will cause CR to create a Cartesian join if any of the Command fields are used outside of the parameter's LOVs.
HTH,
Jason

Object Lock Shortcut (Cmd 2) - Not working

I can use the Object Lock shortcut on my Mac at home but for some reason that I can't solve, it does not work on my office Mac.
Are there any triggers or settings that I can toggle to allow me to use this extremely helpful shortcut???
Thanks

There are a couple of places to look as to why your CMD 2 is not working
Illustrator >> Edit >> Keyboard Shortcuts
Yours should look like mine.
Also look at your system preferences >> Keyboard, and you want to look at all of these to make sure CMD 2 has not been used for nay of the commands here.

Changing Data Source for command objects

Hi,
My report (designed in CR 10) is running based on the Stored Procedure call using a command object; which is running successfully in the DEV environment. The report data source connectivity is a DSN.
Now i want to switch it to QA environment with different DSN name. When i tried to update the Change Data Source option, it doesn't allows to update the existing command with a new command!!!!
I don't know how to fix this. Could any one of you have idea, pls. share it here???
Thanks
Viswa

If you have same table structure in new data source then you can change the datasource connection.
Follow the steps in this article
KBase Article ID:c2016958
Article refers to:Crystal Reports 10
Symptom
In Crystal Reports (CR) 10, can you change the database connection of an existing command object to use a different database connection without the use of a Crystal Repository?
Resolution
Yes, you can change the database connection of an existing command object to use a different database connection without the use of a Crystal Repository by using the following steps:
====================
NOTE:
You must apply the CR 10 Monthly Hot Fix (cr10win_en.zip) and the CR 10 Database and Export Drivers Monthly Hot Fix (dbex10win_en.zip) before starting the steps below.
You can download these hot fixes at http://support.businessobjects.com/search
====================
1. Open a report with a command object.
2. Go the 'Database' menu and click 'Set Datasource Location'.
3. In the 'Set Datasource Location' dialog box, select the connection for the command object (the connection appears as a cylinder with a plug).
4. In the lower window, select the new connection and log on to the database.
5. Ensure the connection is highlighted for the command object in the top window, and the connection is highlighted for the new command object in the bottom window.
6. Click Update.
The database connection for the command object now changes to use the new database connection information.
Regards,
Raghavendra

Command object locks table (TX)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for