Compare query ZY/SD Functional area ZREP:Type conflict for field MARC-DISPO

Hi,
Iam in 3.1i system, trying to load fUser group SD and Query ZY for the Functional area ZREP from text file.
Iam getting error log as : Compare query ZY/SD functional area ZREP : TYPE conflict for field MARC-DISPO
Could anybody please provide the solution.
Thanks, Krishna
Edited by: Krishnama Raju Samunuri on Jun 20, 2008 8:37 PM

Hi DST
This is a great effort and gesture. thank you on behalf of all the newbies.
PJ

Similar Messages

Run Time: type conflicts in field symbol

In this statement i am getting run time error : assign component.
type conflicts in field symbol
FIELD-SYMBOLS:
    <fs_tab> TYPE ANY table,
     <wa_tab> TYPE ANY,
     <fs_field> type crmd_orderadm_h.
DATA:      w_data    TYPE REF TO data.
CREATE DATA w_data TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF (c_tabname) WITH NON-                     UNIQUE DEFAULT KEY.
    ASSIGN w_data->* TO <fs_tab>.
SELECT * FROM (c_tabname)
          INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <fs_tab>
LOOP AT <fs_tab> ASSIGNING <wa_tab>.
      DO.
        ASSIGN COMPONENT sy-index OF STRUCTURE <wa_tab> TO <fs_field>.
*Writeing: fs_field here*
Enddo.

FIELD-SYMBOLS: <fs_field> type crmd_orderadm_h.
<fs_field> type any.
i cannot pass "
lv_header_guid =    <fs_field>-guid.
complete code as follows.
LOOP AT <fs_tab> ASSIGNING <wa_tab>.
      DO.
        ASSIGN COMPONENT sy-index OF STRUCTURE <wa_tab> TO <fs_field>.
*i am assining fs_field-guid here. Thats why i am taking this field symbol as type "crmd_orderadm_h"*
*bold* * <fs_field>-guid.*bold**
        lv_header_guid =    <fs_field>-guid.
        iv_header_guid = lv_header_guid.
        REFRESH: lt_header_guid.
        INSERT iv_header_guid INTO TABLE lt_header_guid.
        REFRESH: im_orderadm_h,im_text.
        CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_READ'
          EXPORTING
            it_header_guid       = lt_header_guid
          IMPORTING
            et_orderadm_h        = im_orderadm_h
            et_text              = im_text
          EXCEPTIONS
            document_not_found   = 1
            error_occurred       = 2
            document_locked      = 3
            no_change_authority = 4
            no_display_authority = 5
            no_change_allowed    = 6
            OTHERS               = 7.
        IF sy-subrc <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
        ENDIF.
      ENDDO.

Type Conflict In Field Symbol

Hi All,
We were doing a report to read all major infotypes and displaying the relevant data. It was working fine until we included Personal data (Infotype 0002).
We used a field symbol of type any and pnnnn type prelp. It was working fine. But when we included details from PA0002, it is throwing a runtime error stating type conflict between field symbol and pnnnn. (We used pnnnn[] = <f>.
Note: We are using ECC 6.0 and the program is Unicode enabled
Kind Regards
Hari Sankar M

Hi Prince,
Yes. You need to change the declaration as follows.
Field symbols:<wa_ext> TYPE ANY,
<f_zname> TYPE any.
Data: lv_zname type sname.
ASSIGN COMPONENT 86 OF STRUCTURE <wa_ext> TO <f_zname>.
lv_zname = <f_zname>.
Try the above mentioned code. I think this should work.
Best Regards,
Ram.

Personal Profile service for Brazil - Type Conflict for infotype 0002

Hello All,
We are enabling personal profile service for Brazil. And we did all the required configuration for that.
When I access the personal info service I can see the overview page with personal data. But when I click on display link, I get the error message saying -
Type conflict with ASSIGN in program CL_HRPA_UI_CONVERT_0002_BR
Is there any configuration missing?
Thanks,
Bhushan

Short text
    Type conflict with ASSIGN in program "CL_HRPA_UI_CONVERT_0002_BR====CP".
What happened?
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "CL_HRPA_UI_CONVERT_0002_BR====CP" had to be
     terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
What can you do?
    Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.
    To process the problem further, contact you SAP system
    administrator.
    Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look
    at and manage termination messages, and you can also
    keep them for a long time.
Error analysis
    You attempted to assign a field to a typed field symbol,
    but the field does not have the required type.
How to correct the error
    Adapt the type of the field symbol to the type of the field or use an
    untyped field symbol or use the "CASTING" addition.
    If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
    find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
    If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
    keywords:
    "ASSIGN_TYPE_CONFLICT" " "
    "CL_HRPA_UI_CONVERT_0002_BR====CP" or "CL_HRPA_UI_CONVERT_0002_BR====CM003"
    "IF_HRPA_UI_CONVERT_STANDARD~OUTPUT_CONVERSION"
    If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error
    notification to SAP, include the following information:
    1. The description of the current problem (short dump)
       To save the description, choose "System->List->Save->Local File
    (Unconverted)".
    2. Corresponding system log
       Display the system log by calling transaction SM21.
       Restrict the time interval to 10 minutes before and five minutes
    after the short dump. Then choose "System->List->Save->Local File
    (Unconverted)".
    3. If the problem occurs in a problem of your own or a modified SAP
    program: The source code of the program
       In the editor, choose "Utilities->More
    Utilities->Upload/Download->Download".
Line SourceCde
    6   DATA: attributes           TYPE hrpad_field_attribute_tab.
    7   DATA: l_object_key         TYPE hcm_object_key.
    8   DATA: l_subrc              TYPE sysubrc.
    9
   10   FIELD-SYMBOLS <r0002_br>   TYPE hcmt_bsp_pa_br_r0002.
   11   FIELD-SYMBOLS <p0002_br>   TYPE p0002.
   12   FIELD-SYMBOLS <p0625>      TYPE p0625.
   13
   14   is_ok = if_hrpa_ui_convert_standard~true.
   15   ASSIGN screen_structure    TO <r0002_br>.
   16   l_object_key = <r0002_br>-object_key.
   17   MOVE-CORRESPONDING pnnnn TO super_screen_ref.
   18
   19   CALL METHOD super->if_hrpa_ui_convert_standard~output_conversion
   20     EXPORTING
   21       screen_structure_name = a_super_screen_structure_main
   22       pnnnn                 = pnnnn
   23       message_handler       = message_handler
   24       field_metadatas       = field_metadatas
   25     IMPORTING
   26       screen_structure      = super_screen_ref
   27       is_ok                 = is_ok
   28       field_attributes      = field_attributes.
   29
   30   MOVE-CORRESPONDING super_screen_ref TO screen_structure.
   31
   32   CASE a_super_screen_structure_main.
   33     WHEN 'HCMT_BSP_PA_XX_R0002'.
   34       ASSIGN pnnnn                  TO <p0002_br>.
   35       ASSIGN screen_structure       TO <r0002_br>.
>>>>>       ASSIGN pnnnn2                 TO <p0625>.
   37       MOVE-CORRESPONDING <p0002_br> TO <r0002_br>.
   38       MOVE-CORRESPONDING <p0625>    TO <r0002_br>.

Assign Type conflict with field symbols

I have two tables tab1 & tab2, want to assign field values from tab1 to tab2 suing field symbols. Deatils are :
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_tab1,
    item1   TYPE char20,
    item2   TYPE char20,
    val1 type i,
    val2 type i,
END OF ty_tab1,
BEGIN OF ty_tab2,
    item1 TYPE char20,
    item2 TYPE char20,
END OF ty_tab2.
DATA: it_tab1 TYPE TABLE OF ty_tab1,
            it_tab2 TYPE TABLE OF ty_tab2.
FIELD-SYMBOLS <fs_tab1> TYPE ty_tab1.
                 <fs_tab2t> type ty_tab2.
LOOP AT it_tab1 assigning <fs_tab1>.
    READ TABLE it_tab2 assigning <fs_tab2> WITH KEY item1 = <fs_tab1>-item1
                                                                                item2 = <fs_tab1>-item2.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      ASSIGN COMPONENT 'ITEM1' OF STRUCTURE <fs_tab1> TO <fs_tab2>.
     ASSIGN COMPONENT 'ITEM2' OF STRUCTURE <fs_tab1> TO <fs_tab2>.
    endif.
endloop.
Getting error msg
You attempted to assign a field to a typed field symbol, but the field does not have the required type.
whats the reason of error.
Edited by: Matt on May 27, 2011 8:59 AM - added tags

Taken from example dump
A new value is to be assigned to the field "...", although this field is
entirely or partly protected against changes.
The following are protected against changes:
- Character literals or numeric literals
- Constants (CONSTANTS)
- Parameters of the category IMPORTING REFERENCE for functions and
methods
- Untyped field symbols not yet assigned a field using ASSIGN
- TABLES parameters if the actual parameter is protected against changes
- USING reference parameters and CHANGING parameters for FORMs, if the
actual parameter is protected against changes and
- Accesses using field symbols if the field assigned using ASSIGN is
protected (or partially protected, e.g. key components of an internal
table with the type SORTED or HASHED TABLE) against changes
- Accesses using references, if the field bound to the reference is
protected (or partially protected) against changes
- External write accesses to READ-ONLY attributes,
- Content of a shared object area instance accessed using a shared lock
(ATTACH_FOR_READ).
You likely fall in one of these cases. Check each and if still unsure please share your code so we can reproduce the error.
Regards
Marcin

Change pointer in IDOC message-type ARTMAS, for field MARA-LVORM

Hi,
When changing the description of a material in MM02 I am able to sent an idoc using BD21. As this relevant for a change pointer. But when field MARA-LVORM (deletion flag at client level) is chosen, I can not sent an idoc with bd21. How can I make this happen?
thanks.

Hi,
Sorry I interpreted your question in wrong way. Solution I gave was for following requirement.
Every time a material is created or changed a change pointer is created, which serves as a signal for generating IDocs to dependent systems. However, change of material type creates a change pointer that doesn't trigger an IDoc.The purpose is to create the change pointers and send the idocs. Eg. Material type field. As per your reply above I guess change pointer created for LVORM is enough to send the idocs.
KR Jaideep,

Functional Area field not getting populated in the AUFK table

Hi Friends,
The table AUFK is the table for Internal Order master data.
The issue which we are facing is:
In a particular Order type, the field 'Functional Area' is suppressed in the field status group for the order master data.
But the cost centers which are maintained in the order master has the functional area field populated with value.
In the table AUFK, the functional area field is populated for some internal orders and not populated for others. In all cases it should pick the functional area from the cost center which is maintained in the internal order.
Please guide us about what can be the possible reason(s) for populating the field in some cases while not populating in other cases.
Thanks a lot in advance for your help.
Regards,
Shilpi

Hi,
maintain the functional area in order master data to ensure 100% functional area is available in AUFK.
I can't tell you the reason why its sometimes appearing and sometimes not bur FUNC_AREA is not picked from responsible/requesting cost center (from master data).
If in customizing of internal order order types a "model-order" is assigned with maintained functional area, this func_area is taken if you create a new order for this ordertype.
Best regards, Christian

Functional Area determination in MIRO postings

We are on ECC 5.0
We had A/P invoices were posted via MIRO where the account assignment was changed.
Right now we have:
-Functional areas defined in all cost center master records.
-Functional areas defined for a select group of balance sheet accounts.
-Configured a special PO type Z to allow POs to be created against balance sheet accounts
The scenario is this:
When the account assignment of a PO is changed during MIRO invoice entry, it seems as though the functional area is still being derived off of the original account assignment. So it posts it to the right cost center, wrong functional area.
Is there a way to have MIRO re-derive the functional area during invoice entry?
Also, when I tried to correct the issue through a manual journal entry via FB50, I received the error message: "
An entry in field Functional Area is not permitted for account 732000." Message no. F5394
Does anyone know what might cause this error message? I tried to change the field status group for that GL account by making functional area optional and tried the je again with the same error message.
Any idea how to correct the prior mispostings?
Thanks!

Hi,
i did nt understand what s functional area determination ! can you pls explain further. If you are talking about sales area then yes if the customer belongs to more than one sales area the system would give a pop up and you can select what you want.
you can also change later to the sales area required provided no subsequent processing of the sales order has taken place.
regards
sadhu kishore

Functional Area not picked

Hi,
I have major issue. I have activated functional area in FI and for Revenue accounts the functional area is defaulted from the GL account.
But for the month of August for few line items the functional area is not picked, therefore all you reporting are incorrect.
I have two questions;
A. How can only for certain line items functional area is not picked?
B. Is there any way to manually include the functional area for those line items?
Thanks
Gayani

Check the GL Account master data for changes at COA level. Also verify whetehr master data was ALE'd from other client that might have created this issue - check whether data was fixed with another ALE transfer.
Obviously you cant chagne existing documents. You may reverse and repost if possible.
Regards
Subodh

Derivation of functional area in CO

Hi all,
CO postings with the use of the functional area are incorrect because:
- the validity dates of the functional area (settings made in FM_Function) should prevent me from making postings in CO in certain cases. For example, I'm making internal CO postings (KP06) for the year 2008 period 12 and the functional area is valid until 2007 period 12. The system lets me register the postings. In the other hand, such a control is effective in FI because a FB60 execution controls the date with the functional area validity period.
For me it's a bug. Can you help me to identify it?
Thanks in advance
Pascal

Hi Lakshman,
1. For activation/deactivation of Cost of Sales Accounting, the path is IMG - Financial Accounting - Finacial Accounting Global Settings - Company Code - Cost of Sales Accounting - Activate COst of Sales Accounting for Preparation
2. You can derive Funcational Area by maintaining Substituation Rules and Activating them. Follow the path - IMG - Financial Accounting - Finacial Accounting Global Settings - Company Code - Cost of Sales Accounting - Set up Substitution for Cost of Sales Accounting - Define Substitution.
After define substitution, activate the same.
Hope this will help you.
Thanks & Regards

How to fill Functional Area on Appropriation request

Hi guys!
We faced a problem to fill standart field IMAK-FKBER (functional area) on Appropriation request. Despite the fact it exists in standart table, there are no standart ways to fill that field through IMA1N or IMA11.
However we assigned FA NG000001 to a Cost center 10000001 and defined that cost center in AR, but still after saving chnages no value changed in IMAK-FKBER?
Does anyone know which organisational units (company code, business area, functional location) effect on the value of functional area in IMAK table? Or is there other way to define FA for appropriation request?
Any help appreciated.

Hi Kir Zu,
I suspect this is an obsolete field, since it makes little sense to be derived from anything at all, while at the same time it is not on the screen.
SAP has a number of obsolete fields even in Customizing activities that allow an entry, but ignored by standard programs.
The best way to confirm it would be to look through ABAP code for AR data save. You can try to populate it with a user exit, but it also makes little sense since the field is not visible.
Also look at the function that creates WBS-element/Order from IMA11, it is passing the master data values to respective WBS/Order and your ABAPer can see if Functional Area is passed or not.
Functional Area makes sense only for Account Assignment Objects used in Financial Accounting, while AR is not an account assignment object.
Regards,
Paulo

Functional Area populating in MIRO during simulation

Hello,
We are in ECC6.0 EHP4, we have a need to Populate "*Functional area*" into table BSEG, for which we have maintained this in PO, and through PO this comes on to MIRO screen, but when I do simulation, The simulation screen does not show "functional area" which in turn does not populate in BSEG, how can we have this value for the field "Functional area" be populated into BSEG, if I have to use an user exit, I need one that is a part if 'MIRO" and updates the BSEG table

Hi Satya,
functional area basically define in FI module as Financial Accounting Global Settings/Financial Accounting Definition/Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)
which is just Typical functional areas are Sales, Production, Marketing, Administration and Research & Development.
so its segregating business by it department as we created via below path:
Financial Accounting Global Settings (New)->Ledgers->Fields->Standard Fields->Functional Area for Cost of Sales Accounting->Define Functional Area
Regards,
Sanjeev

Functional Area update in FAGLFLEXP table

Hi
We have activated Cost of sales accounting in ECC6 and defined the Functional Area in the Cost Center.
When we do CO Planning using KP06, ths system is not updating COSP and FAGLFLEXP tables with functional area.
Request to know if anyone knows how to populate functional area in these tables for CO Planning values.
Thanks & Regards
Manohar Bondili

Hi Suraj
Yes we have activated the Scenario of Functional Area.
The FA is getting populated for the actual values but not for planned values.
We do not enter FA in planning as it is supposed to be derived from Cost Center for which we are doing the planning.
Regards
Manohar

Update Bseg table for one field (Functional Area)

Dear all
I need to update function area in bseg table for existing records. How can i modify for that particular field without using update command. Is any BAPI is there for update document no. I have Lakhs records. So is any other way to modify that field.
This is happening in production. please give your valuable guide how to do it?

I'm not sure it is advisable to perform, take a look at OSS [Note 966428 - FB02: Functional area (FKBER) can be changed on coding block|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/966428],*this note seems to imply that this area should not be changed..
Look alsio to Customizing (SPRO) Financial Accounting, Financial Accounting Global Settings, Document, Line Item, Document Change Rules, Line Item.
Keep in mind that this field is replicated from FI line items to other applications and tables.
If you must perform this change at you own risk, you may build a huge batch-input based on FB02 or FB09 transactions. Another solution is to reverse the documents and then post again those documents with functional area.
Regards

GRC-AC 5.3 CUP Functional Area and Company - How does it works?

Hello experts,
Can someone give a clue on how do Roles Attributes -> "Functional Area and Company" works?
I was imagining that it could be used a stage with Approver Determinator by "Role" , but had no success, is that the right way to use it?

Hello Chinmaya,
Thanks for your reply.
In fact, I already use Company and also Functional Area in the role for filtering purposes. I do not need different initiators for different Companies.
What I really tried to do was make GRC-CUP determine the role approvers of a stage to those I informed in Configuration -> Roles -> Attributes -> "Functional Area and Company".
Consider this example: if someone ask for a role that have Functional Areas F1 and F2 and Companies C1 and C2, and I configured Funcional Area and Company F1C1 to approver A, F1C2 to approver B, F2C1 to approver C, F2C2 to approver D. Then the request would go to approvers A, B, C and D. This is sort of what I was expecting, but could not make it work.
Regards,
Vaner

Compare query ZY/SD Functional area ZREP:Type conflict for field MARC-DISPO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for