Condition not to inventorize

Hi Everyone,
My requirement is that I don't want to inventorize freight. In my pricing procedure standard condition type fra1 is used and is marked as accruals in m/06. Also in the procedure the condition is marked as statistical, in the accounts key FRE is given and in accruals key FR1 is given.
Now say a PO is created for a material with 100 INR as price and fra1 is 10%.So the PO shows net price is 100 which is correct. But at the time of migo, the postings that take place are as follows,
BSX: +110
WRX: -100
FR1: -10.
So, the freight is getting inventorized.
Also, I tried removing the accruals flag for the condition type. But in that case the postings at MIGO are as follows,
BSX: +110
WRX: -110
So, in this case too freight gets inventorized.
Can we do this ourselves or help of abaper is required.
Also where does account key FRE come into picture.
The matter is of utmost urgence. Your suggestions would be seriously appreciated.
Regards.

HI
In M/06 for the condition type under control data - condition category - make it delivery costs and assign the freight vendor in migo to freight condition
If u cant do tht then keep the freight condition after NAVS condition type in pricing procedure and maintain it as accruals and also assign fre fr1 keys
thank You

Similar Messages

I list books on Amazon when on IE my condition notes were always saved & I could pick any one but when using firefox they not saved how can I fix this?

I list books on Amazon when on IE my condition notes were always saved & I could pick any one but when using firefox they not saved how can I fix this?

Clear the cache and the cookies from websites that cause problems.
"Clear the Cache":
*Firefox/Tools > Options > Advanced > Network > Cached Web Content: "Clear Now"
"Remove Cookies" from sites causing problems:
*Firefox/Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: "Show Cookies"
Make sure that you aren't blocking cookies.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Cookies
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Deleting+cookies
Start Firefox in [[Safe Mode|Safe Mode]] to check if one of the extensions (Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Extensions) or if hardware acceleration is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Appearance).
*Do NOT click the Reset button on the Safe Mode start window or otherwise make changes.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Safe+Mode
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes

OR condition not working correctly in SQL

I am adding the folling condition to a sql statement and
AND (status_code IS NULL or status_code <> 'T'
or (status_code IN ('A','B','C','D') and TRIM(order_type) NOT LIKE '%9999')
or (status_code IN ('A','B','C','D') and order_type IS NOT NULL)
or (status_code NOT IN ('A','B','C','D')))
but the or condition work...
if i change it too
AND ( (status_code IN ('A','B','C','D') and order_type IS NOT NULL) )
then this portion of the OR condition work but when I use the OR condition something weird is happening that the condition not working... and i dont see a record that meets that condition...

Hi,
It's not the "trim" that implies "not null", but rather the fact that:
- "not like" operator works only on non-null values and
- "not like" operator disregards null values.
Consider this:
test@ORA92>
test@ORA92>
test@ORA92> l
1 with x as (
2 select null as y from dual union all
3 select 'a9999' from dual union all
4 select 'bxx' from dual
5 )
6 select * from x
7* where y not like '%9999'
test@ORA92>
test@ORA92> /
Y
bxx
1 row selected.
test@ORA92>
test@ORA92>Here, trim function was not used, but still the first row (that had null for y) was not returned. That's because Oracle disregarded the first row for comparison and out of the next two rows, it returned the third row because it satisfied the condition.
As for your query, do the following conditions hold true:
1. if status_code is null - show the row regardless of order_type
2. if status_code <> 'T' - show the row regardless of order_type
3. if status_code in (a,b,c,d) and order_type is not null and order_type ends with something other than 9999 - show the row
4. if status_code in (a,b,c,d) and order_type is null - do not show the row
5. if status_code in (a,b,c,d) and order_type is not null and it ends with 9999 - do not show the row
6. if status_code is anything other than (a,b,c,d) - do not show the rowpratz

Tax Condition not geeting updated

Hi Friends,
I have a problem of tax condition not appearing in the contracts. My condition is based on the combination (IN VK11) of Country/Customer/Material/Pricegroup.
All my masters are maintained, my problem is the field price group in the header level has actually gone blank due to which the condition is not appearing. This field used to get popoulated from the customer master and my customer is up to date. I want to fill in the field with the required data as maintained i the customer master. Can someone please suggest how can I achieve this.
Currently the only option that I see is go in the contract and fill the price gropu field manually. Is there a way to populate this field automatically as I have more than 5000 contract which have been affected.
Please help.
Regards,
Wasim.

Hi
Kindly check the pricing analysis in the order on whoich key combination the tax is coming
and check the routine maintained against the condition type UTXJ in V/08 t code
Regards
Damu

Conditional Not Null

I am trying to create an item level validation on an entry form for a Conditional Not Null. For example ...
Field 1 = Animal Type
Field 2 = Dog Type
If Field 1 = Dog .... Field 2 must be Not Null.
Can someone help me set this up. Thanks in advance for your assistance.

Are REQUEST_TYPE and ACCT_EXTERNAL_ONLY page items? Because in that case you have to use the bind variable syntax to access them.
IF :REQUEST_TYPE = 'External' AND :ACCT_EXTERNAL_ONLY IS NULL THEN
RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR (-20001,'Error Message');
END IF;Patrick
My APEX Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
The APEX Builder Plugin: http://builderplugin.oracleapex.info/
The ApexLib Framework: http://apexlib.sourceforge.net/

How to make a condition not changeable in VA02 and VF01

Dear All,
i want to make basic price condition not changable and other two condition named as retaintion and advance changable in VA02 and VF01
How can i do it
in VF01 It should only copy from sales order and come should comes as not chngable and changable respectively
how to do this.
Regards
Subrat

Thanks sai
for your fantastic reply this is what i need .
actually scinario is a project based so i can not make conditions automatic.
but i need that it should not be changable in the system again and again.
as per ur suggestion i ll do this but will it give effect to past documents.
as i want to give authorization for changes to some of the users can i do it.
thanks for ur very help..
i am assigning points to it but not closing the issue if u ll tell i can open another issue by closing this..
regards
Subrat

Need multiple variables to select data based on OR condition not AND condit

Hello All,
We have a requirement where we want the user to enter a variable 1X. Then based on this entry select from the InfoCube to check multiple fields where this value could potentially be. If we put variables on each characteristic in the query and let them input the same value for each, the system tries to find a record where all characteristics have this value. Our situation is that we don't know if field1, field2, field3 will have this value. So an OR condition, not an AND needs to be generated.
We are stuck. Has anyone tried this before?
Thanks!

You can create 3 restricted Key Figures.
RKF1 : KF restricted by var1 on Char A
RKF2 : KF restricted by var2 on Char B
RKF3 : KF restricted by var3 on Char C
Make var1, var2 and var3 as ready for input. Don't use variables in Free Characteristic

VPRS condition not floating in to sales order...

Good evening every body...
My query is VPRS condition not floating in to sales order...
Please give your valuable inputs
I checked Pricing procedure analysis
giving error requirement 004 not fulfilled
Note:
I checked determine cost in Item category (TAN)
VPRS condition in my pricing procedure
I maintained Standard price in Accounting1 tab of MMR
Valuation class I maintained in MMR
VPRS condition type I maintain condition category-"G"
Anything I missed out???
Regards,
Krishna

In my view, the information provided by you is not sufficient to provide you an exact solution.
As based on & differs business scenario to business scenario you are following.
Like whether it is BOM, MTO/MTS, Free Goods, batches, third party sales, Order-related billing or Delivery-related billing:...
Business Process
Source of costing
- Order-related billing
Valuation price of the material master
- Delivery-related billing
Goods issue
Further there are various way to carry out costing at Sales order, like
- Product costing
- Unit costing
So, you can check whether EK01/EK02 or any other cost related is executing prior/take preference to VPRS in your pricing
Also. kindly check your entries for Account Determination for valuation area(T001K) by using TCode OMWD.
If everything is fine, then test run a Sales cycle till Billing, so as to see whether at billing VPRS is reflecting or not.
If in case you need further assistance, do let us know.
Regards
JP

Value from a condition type not to inventorize

Hi friends,
I have a Pricing procedure for Cross company stock transfers.
Supplying plant put some margin on the material price and will supply it.
Now My question is how to avoid the value of the margin getting inventorized(adding to the material price) in the receiving plant
As iam using Std price for this FERT material in the receiving plant , it is trying to inventorize.
I have assigned an Account key and accrual key , for this margin condition type in my pricing procedure.
many thanks
krishna

Hi Manish,
If you dont want it to add to your inventory make that condition stastical in pricing
Put stastical check box tick
Hope this will help you
BR
Diwakar
reward if useful

Terms and conditions not getting displayed on the last page

Hi All,
I have to display a smartform, on the front side of the page i have to display material details and on the back side of the page i have to display terms and conditions. I' am unable to print the material details and terms and conditions in duplex mode, but on the last page only material details are getting displayed, terms and conditions are not getting displayed.
Can you please help me how to make the terms and conditions get printed on the back side of the last page.
Thanks,

I'm a bit confused by the statement "I' am unable to print the material details and terms and conditions in duplex mode".
I suppose you meant to say "I am able to print the material details and terms and conditions in duplex mode", correct?
If the problem is that on the last form page, the T&C is not getting printed on the back of the form, you could force the T&C page by using a flow logic command as the very last element of the main window, which gets processed when all the data is already output. For the command, use the 'Go to New Page' and specify the page name for the Terms & Conditions.
In case this causes an issue that the last page is printed twice (since the T&C page is likely defined with the next page being NEXT_PAGE), then copy the already existing T&C page, call it LASTPAGE and leave the Next Page attribute empty.

Date condition not working correctly in Desktop

Hello,
I have two custom folders in Admin that are joined. One of the folders contains the following query:
SELECT ORGANIZATION_ID, ASSET_NUMBER, MIN(CURRENT_READING_DATE) FIRST_READ_DATE, MIN(CURRENT_READING) FIRST_READING
FROM EAM_METER_READINGS_V
WHERE PREV_DESC IS NULL
Group By ORGANIZATION_ID, ASSET_NUMBER
I want my workbook to report the earliest meter reading that exists, based on the date that is specified in the parameters in Desktop. When I create a parameter for the date, the workbook reports the earliest reading in the database; it ignores the date restriction entered in the parameter. This is the parameter:
First Read Date MIN BETWEEN :First Reading Date and SYSDATE
If I include the date condition in the SQL of the custom folder the workbook functions exactly as it should. The date condition is in the SQL as the following:
and current_reading_date between '01-JAN-2007' and SYSDATE
Since the workbook functions correctly when the condition is coded in the SQL but not when it is based on a parameter, I assume the problem is with the parameter. Any ideas on how I may correct this?
Thanks,
Steve

Thanks for the response Michael. I tried using the MIN function as you suggested, but I still am not getting the expected result. I’m not sure that I was clear in my initial problem description. I will try to provide more detail with this post.
The reason I have two custom folders is that my original query has a nested Select statement (EAMV) and I couldn’t find a way to pass the parameter from EAMV to Discoverer. Following is the original query. I suppose the first logical questions would be, is there a way to pass the parameter to Discoverer? Would this alleviate the need for the second custom folder?
SELECT K.ORGANIZATION_CODE "ORG" -- ORGANIZATION
, K.ORGANIZATION_ID
,A.NAME "PM SCHEDULE NAME" -- PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE NAME
--( (B.RUNTIME_INTERVAL/F.USER_DEFINED_RATE) + D.LAST_SERVICE_END_DATE) "PROJECTED READ DATE" -- USES USER_DEFINED_RATE FROM METER DEFINITION
,(C.LAST_SERVICE_READING + B.RUNTIME_INTERVAL) "PROJECTED READ UNITS" -- NEXT SERVICE READING DUE UNITS
,F.METER_UOM "UOM" -- UNIT OF MEASURE ON METER
,F.METER_NAME "METER NAME" -- METER NAME
,G.SERIAL_NUMBER "MAINT EQ NO" -- MAINTAINED EQUIPMENT NUMBER
,H.C_ATTRIBUTE1 "MAKE" -- MAINTAINED EQUIPMENT NUMBER - MAKE/MANUFACTURER
,H.C_ATTRIBUTE2 "MODEL" -- MAINTAINED EQUIPMENT NUMBER - MODEL
,H.C_ATTRIBUTE4 "SERIAL NO" -- MAINTAINED EQUIPMENT NUMBER - SERIAL NUMBER
,I.SEGMENT1 "ACTIVITY" -- ASSET ACTIVITY
,D.LAST_SERVICE_END_DATE "LAST READ DATE" -- DATE OF LAST PM SERVICE READING
,C.LAST_SERVICE_READING "LAST READ UNITS" -- UNITS OF LAST PM SERVICE READING
,E1.CURRENT_READING_DATE "CURRENT READ DATE" -- DATE OF CURRENT SERVICE READING (FROM METER FORM)
,E1.CURRENT_READING                                   "CURRENT READ UNITS" -- UNITS OF CURRENT SERVICE READING (FROM METER FORM)
,E1.LIFE_TO_DATE_READING "LIFE TO DATE READING" LIFE TO DATE READING
--,(E1.CURRENT_READING - C.LAST_SERVICE_READING) "CURRENT/LAST VARIANCE" -- UNITS SINCE LAST PM SERVICE READING
,( (C.LAST_SERVICE_READING + B.RUNTIME_INTERVAL) - E1.CURRENT_READING ) "PROJECTED/CURR VARIANCE" -- UNITS REMAINING UNTIL NEXT SCHEDULED READING
,J.DESCRIPTION "LOCATION" -- OWNING DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION OF ASSET NUMBER
,J.DEPARTMENT_CODE
,E1.DISABLE_FLAG
,G.CURRENT_STATUS
,B.RUNTIME_INTERVAL
,Y.SET_NAME
,EAMV.FIRST_READ_DATE READ_DATE
,EAMV.FIRST_READING READING
FROM EAM.EAM_PM_SCHEDULINGS A
,EAM.EAM_PM_SCHEDULING_RULES B
,EAM.EAM_PM_LAST_SERVICE C
,INV.MTL_EAM_ASSET_ACTIVITIES D
,EAM.EAM_ASSET_METERS E
,EAM.EAM_METER_READINGS E1
,EAM.EAM_METERS F
,INV.MTL_SERIAL_NUMBERS G
,INV.MTL_EAM_ASSET_ATTR_VALUES H
,INV.MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B I
,BOM.BOM_DEPARTMENTS J
,INV.MTL_PARAMETERS K
,EAM.EAM_PM_SET_NAMES Y
     ,(SELECT ORGANIZATION_ID, ASSET_NUMBER, MIN(CURRENT_READING_DATE) FIRST_READ_DATE, MIN(LIFE_TO_DATE_READING) FIRST_READING
          FROM EAM_METER_READINGS_V
          WHERE CURRENT_READING_DATE BETWEEN '01-JAN-2007' AND '30-JUN-2007'
          GROUP BY ORGANIZATION_ID, ASSET_NUMBER) EAMV
WHERE A.PM_SCHEDULE_ID = B.PM_SCHEDULE_ID
AND A.ACTIVITY_ASSOCIATION_ID = C.ACTIVITY_ASSOCIATION_ID
AND C.ACTIVITY_ASSOCIATION_ID = D.ACTIVITY_ASSOCIATION_ID
AND D.SERIAL_NUMBER = E.ASSET_NUMBER
AND D.ORGANIZATION_ID = E.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND E.METER_ID = E1.METER_ID
AND E1.METER_READING_ID =
(SELECT MAX(METER_READING_ID)
FROM EAM_METER_READINGS
WHERE METER_ID = E1.METER_ID
AND (DISABLE_FLAG = 'N' OR DISABLE_FLAG IS NULL))
AND E.METER_ID = C.METER_ID
AND E.METER_ID = B.METER_ID
AND E.METER_ID = F.METER_ID
AND D.MAINTENANCE_OBJECT_ID = G.GEN_OBJECT_ID
AND D.ORGANIZATION_ID = G.CURRENT_ORGANIZATION_ID
AND G.SERIAL_NUMBER = H.SERIAL_NUMBER
AND G.CURRENT_ORGANIZATION_ID = H.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND D.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = H.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
AND H.ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY = 'EQUIPMENT DETAILS'
AND D.ASSET_ACTIVITY_ID = I.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID
AND D.ORGANIZATION_ID = I.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND G.OWNING_DEPARTMENT_ID = J.DEPARTMENT_ID (+)
AND I.ORGANIZATION_ID = K.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND A.SET_NAME_ID = Y.SET_NAME_ID
AND Y.SET_NAME IN ('MAIN','COMP')
AND G.CURRENT_ORGANIZATION_ID = EAMV.ORGANIZATION_ID
AND G.SERIAL_NUMBER = EAMV.ASSET_NUMBER
AND K.ORGANIZATION_CODE = 'MCC'
Using this query I want to show the most recent reading (current reading) and then give users the flexibility to enter an earlier date so the earliest reading as of that date will also show. For example, if they enter 1-JAN-2007 as the parameter and there was a reading taken on 2-JAN-07 and 28-JAN-07, the report should show the 2-JAN-2007 reading (in addition to the most recent reading in a separate column). Currently, everything on the report displays correctly, except for the reading based on the parameter.

Condition not updating in Sales Document.

Hi,
We have created a Conditon type ZEX2, a copy of JEX2 with negative value for Deemed Exports. It is working fine in Quality server but not working in PRD Server. Analysis says Condition record not found. Some times it says condition record exists but removed manually and sometimes it says missing.
I tried but couldn't get to a conclusion where I am missing. Please advise.
Regards,
Ajit

Hi Ajit,
Normally this program is run only if u create a new routine for some calculation/requirements in pricing.
If the same worked well for you, I guess it has got to do something with generation of routines after the request has been transported.
Next time try logging off and log in again or run the same program for errors related to pricing. Most of the errors are eliminated in these 2 steps.
Kindly close the thread if ur question is answered
Regards,
Amit
Edited by: Amit Iyer on Aug 24, 2010 11:11 AM

PL/SQL report condition not working

I have a PL/SQL statement to display a report based on a condition and no matter what i try, it still displays all the records. Im trying to display all the records where chart.voided does not equal 'Y'.
I have tried to add the condition to the where clause and also have tried to add a hidden item with a filter. Neither one seem to work.
Does anyone know what i am doing wrong here?
Thanks
Deanna
declare
q varchar2(4000);
begin
-- setup sql for report source
q := 'select * from
(select CHART.RECNUM,CHART.CASE_NUMBER,
CHART.INCIDENT_DATE,CHART.INCIDENT_TIME,
CHART.TROOP#1,CHART.TROOP#2,
CHART.COUNTY,
CHART.LOCATION,CHART.CASE_COMPLETED,CHART.CASE_STATUS,CHART.RECONSTRUCTION,CHART.MAP,
CHART.VOIDED,
CHART.TECHNICIAN1_RADIO,CHART.TECHNICIAN2_RADIO,
chart.technician1_lastname||'',''||chart.technician1_name "TROOPER#1",
chart.technician2_lastname||'',''||chart.technician2_name "TROOPER#2",
chart.technician3_lastname||'',''||chart.technician3_name "TROOPER#3",
chart.technician4_lastname||'',''||chart.technician4_name "TROOPER#4",
chart.technician5_lastname||'',''||chart.technician5_name "TROOPER#5",
CHART.ROLE#1,CHART.ROLE#2,CHART.ROLE#3,CHART.ROLE#4,CHART.ROLE#5,
CHART.TECHNICIAN1_LASTNAME,CHART.TECHNICIAN1_NAME,
CHART.TECHNICIAN2_LASTNAME,CHART.TECHNICIAN2_NAME,
CHART.TECHNICIAN3_LASTNAME,CHART.TECHNICIAN3_NAME,
CHART.TECHNICIAN4_LASTNAME,CHART.TECHNICIAN4_NAME,
CHART.TECHNICIAN5_LASTNAME,CHART.TECHNICIAN5_NAME
FROM CHART)
WHERE (
--:P22_VOID !=''Y'' AND
instr(upper("RECNUM"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"RECNUM"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("CASE_NUMBER"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"CASE_NUMBER"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("INCIDENT_TIME"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"INCIDENT_TIME"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("INCIDENT_DATE"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"INCIDENT_DATE"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("TROOP#1"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"TROOP#1"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("TROOP#2"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"TROOP#2"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("TECHNICIAN1_RADIO"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"TECHNICIAN1_RADIO"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("TECHNICIAN1_NAME"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"TECHNICIAN1_NAME"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("TECHNICIAN1_LASTNAME"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"TECHNICIAN1_LASTNAME"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("TECHNICIAN2_RADIO"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"TECHNICIAN2_RADIO"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("TECHNICIAN2_NAME"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"TECHNICIAN2_NAME"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("TECHNICIAN2_LASTNAME"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"TECHNICIAN2_LASTNAME"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("COUNTY"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"COUNTY"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("LOCATION"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"LOCATION"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("CASE_COMPLETED"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"CASE_COMPLETED"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("CASE_STATUS"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"CASE_STATUS"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("RECONSTRUCTION"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"RECONSTRUCTION"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("MAP"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"MAP"))) > 0 or
instr(upper("VOIDED"),upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"VOIDED"))) > 0)';
--Filter Voided
--         if :P22_VOID !='Y' THEN
--                q := q || ' and instr(upper("VOIDED"),upper(nvl
--(:P22_VOID,"VOIDED"))) > 0';
--         end if;
return q;
end;

Hi, Deanna.
If the only condition for being selected is chart.voided = 'Y', then the WHERE clause should be:
WHERE   chart.voided     = 'Y'If the condition chart.voided = 'Y' is just one of many conditions that must be met, use AND, like this:
WHERE   chart.voided     = 'Y'
AND     (     instr(upper("RECNUM"),         upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"RECNUM")))         > 0
     OR     instr(upper("CASE_NUMBER"), upper(nvl(:P21_SEARCH,"CASE_NUMBER"))) > 0
     OR     ...
     )Don't mix ANDs and ORs at the same level. In my example above, notice how there are two conditions, connected by AND
(1) "chart.voided = 'Y'"
(2) a whole bunch of tests involving INSTR, all connected by OR. The parentheses around this condition are necessary: they keep the ORs at a lower level than the AND connecting the 2 top-level conditions.
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Aug 17, 2009 6:55 PM

IF-condition not working in sap script??????

hi,
 i am trying to chk one condition in sap script using if statement....but it is not working at all.
statement i am writing is :-
/: IF &IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT& <> 0
p7 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,SAD,, 4.00 &IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT&
/: ENDIF
value for IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT is coming as it is shown while debuging .
eventhen control is going inside if statement independent from the value of IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT
how to use if statement properly....
regards
Deepak

Hi,
Declare a dummy variable of type IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT and then use that variable in sapscript..
Ex..
Print program
DATA: V_DUMMY LIKE IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT.
Sap script
/: IF &IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT& <> &V_DUMMY&
p7 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,SAD,, 4.00 &IST_ITEM-SAD_PRINT&
/: ENDIF
Thanks,
Naren

Conditions not appearing in the display mode of Purchase order

Hi,
We are facing an issue where in the display mode of Purchase order,if I click on the conditions tab in the item details, Iam getting a blank screen. But if I trigger the pricing procedure in the change mode for eg. by changing the quantity or price, the conditions are appearing.
I want to know why the conditions are not being shown in the display mode. All the PO's are using the standard pricing proceduresRM0000.
Also when I trigger the pricing in the change mode for some POs the condition types like PB00, NVAS etc are appearing twice, in some POs the condition types are appearing thrice and in some all the condition types are appearing four times.
I have checked out some OSS notes like 798449, 456690 and 772035 but could not find the solution.
Any pointers to this will be eagerly awaited and highly appreciated.

Hi Ramachandra,
The problem on not being able to see details in condition tab is due to lack of authorizations
prasanna

Condition not to inventorize

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for