Condition value of Tax condition type gets added to Total Value in Contract
Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this. When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header = 700.00 EUR
Material Outgoing Target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header = 550.00 EUR
MAterial Outgoing target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.
Edited by: Venkatesh Gopalarathnam on Jan 24, 2012 9:48 AM
No, i didn't.
Actually, i enter condition type and amount in sales order manually.
At that time my program which i modified at 'Define And Assign Pricing Procedures' in IMG should be run.
But the result of running is different from my purpose.
To change Condition value of condition type in sales order, are there any solution?
Similar Messages
-
Condition value of Tax gets wrongly added to Total value of Contract
Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this. When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header = 700.00 EUR
Material Outgoing Target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header = 550.00 EUR
MAterial Outgoing target val
Item 0010 MAT1 450.00 ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020 MAT2 0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.Got the solution by making the condition type as manual.
Thanks.
Dhruba -
Condition Records For Tax Condition types for SAP 4.7
Dear Experts,
What is the procedure to maintain condition records for tax condition types like CST , VAT and Service Tax. We are not using CIN. In MM01 and XD02 tax classifications i have maintained UTXJ condition Type and also maintained the above mention tax condition types.. But when i create condition records for UTXJ in VK11 the sysytem is asking for Tax code. In FTXP when i defined Tax code A1 for Tax ProcedureTAXIN1 where i maintained all the Tax condition types there.But i am unable to save the Tax % in FTXP.When i try to save the tax code it is not saving.
Is there any other procedure to maintain Tax condition types for SAP4.7.
My Pricing procedure that i maintained in V/08 is Z00001.
Regards
JyotiHi Jyoti
Since you are not using CIN, you can do the follwing for tax conditions
Check the assignment of the TAx procedure to country
once u do this , you will be able to maintin the vendor and customer records for MWST type for taxes
then create condition records for MWSt with access sequence MWST in condiution type or design one suited to your needs
alternatevely in the current procedure you can change access sequence for condition type UTXJ form the current one to MWST and then maintain condition records
hope this helps
thanks
Akasha -
Sales Order Unable to Use New Condition Tables for Tax Condition Type
Dear All,
I am currently working on SAP R/3 4.0. I have a new requirement for my tax where I need to create new condition tables other than the 4 standard SAP tables which are Customer/Material, Division/Customer, Departure Country/Destination Country, Domestic Taxes and Export Taxes. My new tables consists of Departure Country/Destination Country/Shipping Point/Tax Code. The requirement is that the tax code is based on the chosen destination country and shipping point. The problem I am facing now is that no matter what types of table I create or even I generate with reference to the standard table, the access sequence will only refer to the 4 standard SAP tables above. Even if I put my own table in the highest priority for the access sequence, the same thing happens. My sales order will only pick up date from the standard table.
I wonder if anyone encountered the same problem as me.
Kindly advise.
Thank you.
Regards,
YvonneHi
Yvonne
I suggest fist check a simple thing ,whether u have successfully determined shipping point for each line item ,it is possible that just adding a line item will not trigger shipping point determination . So after u update the shipping point on line level u can rerun pricing and check agian if u r getting it .
Secondly for tax purposes I suggest Try to have Customer and material tax classification approach this allows to u have long term flexibiliy and also reduces your maintenance activity . As if u change or add number of shipping points and business changes using the sequence of shipping point ,the logic of just using shipping point will not work.
In Tax classification u cna add new condition table for each new tax category and use it in different access sequences.
This information can be passed on to FI using Different Tax code for Different combination.
I hope this helps
Regards
Mandar -
Variance between total value and net value
Dear all
In the service entry sheet, the net value including tax field is 110 but the total value field is 100. Actually both should be Rs.100 only.
What may be the reason?hi
Thanks for the reply.
Input tax
In my service entry sheet, NAVM-Non deductible tax is getting added with the base price. Gross value of unit is 10, but net value incl tax is Rs 10.14. How can i make the system to calculate Gross value is equal to Net value incl of tax? I dont want the system to add Non deductible tax. Kindly help
Regards -
TAX condition value not getting calculated
Hi Gurus,
At my client we are having this strange issue in pricing when invoice creation. We've set up copy control rules as copy all unchanged. When I tried creating invoice, all the elements are getting copied, but the tax value is not getting created. We've delivery to invoice copy control rules, so that we can copy freight and price source is E (delivery/sales order). e.g.
In sales order we have following elements with values:
Price $1000
discount 10% value will be 100
tax5% value will be $45. Total value becomes $ 945
In invoice, it should copy all the elements unchanged, but we are getting following values:
Price $1000
discount 10% value will be 100
tax5% instead of showing value $45, system doesn't show anything. Total value becomes $900.
I checked all the config, including pricing and all the copy control rules. I'm not sure what I'm missing.
Please provide some inputs!!
Thanks,
KetanFirst check the root cause of miss ing TAX condition type in biling through Pricing Analysis.
To do that Billing Doc - Item - Conditions tab - click Analysis Button
Then select the missing TAX condition type for knowing the error.
Also, check the service render date in billing doc.
You can find this Biling doc - Item - Item Detail Tab - Price data
Take note of the date for Serv.rendered
And in the condition record (VK12 / VK13) for Tax condition type.
Check the validity date of condition type.
The date for service render sholud lie in the validity date maintain in condition record.
Regards
JP -
No accounting document generated while new condition type is added
Hi
I added a new condition type to the pricing procedure. While creating the invoice if i try giving a value to the new condition type then i get the message "No accounting document generated", but when i leave it as blank then there is no problem with the a/c docs.
I assume I haven't done the complete settings correctly. Pls help.
I am using RVAA01 as the pricing procedure for standard order.
Regards,
SujaiHi,
As I do not have access to your system, can not comment in details.
But if I have to add a tax codition in pricing, what I would do is :
Create a tax condition, assign it in tax procedure.
Copy it as sales pricing condition.
Assign it in pricing procedure.
Create condition record for tax condition in VK19.
Check tax code in FTXP & its assignment in OB40.
Create condition record for MWST.
I think you need to check the above configuration.
Savita -
Value of the condition should not added to NETWR filed of Item & Header
Hi Experts,
My clients has a specific requirement he wants header freight condition type should go to accounting but *it should not include in (NETWR field) net value field of header and line item of invoice (Table VBRK and VBRP)*
I have done the configuration of pricing procedure and allocated ERF as account key to freight condition type and placed the freight condition type after net value condition type and tax condition type
But unfortunately the value of freight condition type getting added to NETWR field kindly suggest how to handle this problem
Thanks
KrushnaDear Krushna,
in the internal field komp-netwr are all conditions included which are non statistical and active.
(taxes are excluded).
This is the standard behaviour.
But if you set a condition as statistical, this condition has no influence to the komp-netwr but it will be not transfer to FI. Because only all active condtions which are non statistical are transfer to FI.
Maybe you can create your own formula to exclude this condition from the komp-netwr.
I hope that the information are helpful.
regards
Claudia
Edited by: Claudia Neudeck on May 28, 2009 3:25 PM -
Wrong tax condition base value
Hi,
We are getting wrong tax condition base value if an item having particular combination of inactive condition exclusion items-
we have x abd y condition types which are inactive.
if x is having 0.01 then system is considering y value for tax condition value(it should not because it is inactive). If conditions having other than 0.01(for x), we donot have any problem. (even 0 also we donot have any problem)
Any inputs
chidambaramHi
Just check , whether some routines are written against the condition types.
Though inactive , it is picking up the values ,it may be on some per requsite condition.
Regards
KRSNA -
Modify MWST (tax condition) value
Dear All,
I got requirement to modify the value of tax (condition type MWST in Sales Pricing procedure).
Example: base value is 1000, --->tax 10% (automatic by SAP) is 100. However, I want to change this value to 120.
Can I do that, please suggest with the routine or instruction.
Thank you very much,Hi,
I guess this may be ur requirement..
Go to V/06 select ur condition type MWST under the tab Changes which can be made mark the filed Value if its unmarked..
Now create sales order and u will be able to change the value of MWST cond.type manually..in condtion tab
Reg
JJ -
Hi,
I do not want to use Tax Procedure TAXINJ or TAXINN as in this implementation there is no Cenvat, no maintenance of any excise related data, registers etc, etc
Only requirement is in PO we are able to capture various taxes like excise duty, cess on duties, sale tax, LST, etc. what vendor charges to us.
Shall we create directly Tax conditions in PO pricing procedure without using any of TAXINJ or TAXINN? Is it feasible? Any impact?
Can I create conditions with the following
Condition class D (Taxes)
Calculation Type A (Percentage)
Condition category D (Tax)
What shall be the access sequence if any in these conditions?
PO pricing procedure will have condition NAVS and NAVM as conditions or not?
RegardsHi,
If your not going to use CIN module then not to worry about TAXINN or TAXINJ. This comes only under CIN module.
Standard Pricing procedure will take care of your conditions.
For Tax codes you can use FTXP to create. VAT Taxes amount you can get Set off. Regardsing set off you can check with your FI consultant.
Regards
Give points if useful -
Vendor Field not available for Tax Condition
Hello Gurus
We have created a new pricing condition type to capture the Taxes
Condition Class: A( Taxes)
Calculation Type : A (Percentage)
Cond Category: D(Tax)
When i used this condition in PO and select the details of the conditions i can't find the field (vendor-lifnr) in the condition type at all.
When i checked the same for Frieght ( FRB1) in the condition type detials i can see the vendor which i can even change.\
Is it not possble to have vendor field when i have taxes condition class? If not how can i bring this into my condition type details screen
regards
mohammedThanks for you speedy reply ,
We wanted to post this TAX condition to a different vendor than the vendor of the PO. in my condition i did not see the field VENDOR, how can i get this feild VENDOR in this condition details.
Regard
Mohammed -
How to get a Tree Node Value when a Tree is Expanded
My reqiurement is when i Expand a Tree i need the Expanded tree Node Value. For Example Consider Parent as a Root Node of a Tree, and Consider its two Children Child1 and Child2.
When + Parent Expanded
I will Get the Output as --Parent
- Child1
- Child2
so As when i expand the Tree i must Get the String Value Parent.duplicate
How to get a Tree Node Value when a Tree is Expanded -
Opportunity Exp. Total Value field
Hello ,
Opportunity Exp. Total Value is populated automatically according to total of products in opportunity.
It work perfect in some products but I have some product that net value from item line is not populated correctly in Exp. Total Value.
For example :product net value in the line = 25.000 $
In EXP total value we get 17.500 $
In other cases net value just copied to Exp.total value as is.
I guess it is some parameter in item category.
Any help?
RikaI solved the problem
-
Dear All,
I am facing problem for aligning the total values at the bottom pf the page.The total values should be displayed exactly at the bottom of "qty" and "price" fields.On the page I have items,description also apart from these qty and price fields.
Any info plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..Hi,
Try aliging your values using the TableLayout.
Thanks.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have an HP Photosmart 5520 all in one printer and a MacBook Pro. Bought the MacBook Pro in Jan 2013 and the printer in Dec 2012. I was able to print to the wireless printer up until June 2013. In September, when I tried to use them together, I coul
-
Warning console badge on the Mac
Hello! I have a Warning console badge on the Mac for 3 days. What is wrong with? what I must do? All processes are documented there. Thank you very much! svenja
-
Can i search a day across all years in my ical?
what i am wanting to do is search for a date, say june 19th, and see what entries i have for all years i have in my ical at once. is this possible? if so, how do i do it? thanks!
-
How do I cancel my Subscription!?!!
Please help!!! I want to cancel my subscription and the web-site loops me...HELP! Someone please help. I've bee charged $13.99/mo and I have never used this service. What do I do? Thanks to anyone who can help. -dg
-
Has any body looked at oracle's BC4J framework for J2EE development included in JDeveloper?? One major thing in this framework is that entity EJBs are totally eliminated and replaced by light weight objects because of the overhead associated with ent