Value of the condition should not added to NETWR filed of Item & Header

Hi Experts,
My clients has a specific requirement he wants header freight condition type should go to accounting but *it should not include in (NETWR field) net value field of header and line item of invoice (Table VBRK and VBRP)*
I have done the configuration of pricing procedure and allocated ERF as account key to freight condition type and placed the freight condition type after net value condition type and tax condition type
But unfortunately the value of freight condition type getting added to NETWR field kindly suggest how to handle this problem
Thanks
Krushna

Dear Krushna,
in the internal field komp-netwr are all conditions included which are non statistical and active.
(taxes are excluded).
This is the standard behaviour.
But if you set a condition as statistical, this condition has no influence to the komp-netwr but it will be not transfer to FI. Because only all active condtions which are non statistical are transfer to FI.
Maybe you can create your own formula to exclude this condition from the komp-netwr.
I hope that the information are helpful.
regards
Claudia
Edited by: Claudia Neudeck on May 28, 2009 3:25 PM

Similar Messages

System should not allow to delete PO line Item after GR/IR

Hi,
I am working on a SAP Retail Implementation project.
Currently the system is allowing us to delete the PO line items after doing GR or IR against that PO line item. But the clients requirement is that the system should not allow to delete PO line item after doing GR/IR.
We are using Account Assignment Category-N, Item Category-S.
Please let me know if you have the solution for this requirement.
Thanks in advance
Thanks & Regards,
Suresh

Hi,
Standard SAP will not allowed the PO to be deleted once it was GR done. The controlled is on the attributes of message to set as "E"
Message no. 06115
But if invoiced takes place, the is the point that PO can be deleted.
You have to do have a Enhancement using MM06E005, insert you logic here to check PO history tables like EKBE, then check if invoice " Q" (BEWTP) exist, the PO cannot be deleted once the user delete the PO line and SAVE it. Ask you developer to help you on the following coding.
Use MM06E005 and EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
IF SY-TCODE = 'ME22N'.
IF sy-ucomm = 'MESAVE' OR SY-UCOMM = 'YES'..
LOOP AT TEKPO.
IF TEKPO-LOEKZ = 'L'.
SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR1 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'E'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR2 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'Q'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
Regards,

Condition value of Tax condition type gets added to Total Value in Contract

Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this.   When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header =   700.00 EUR
                   Material          Outgoing Target val
Item 0010    MAT1               450.00                          ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020    MAT2               150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header =   550.00 EUR
                        MAterial       Outgoing target val
Item 0010         MAT1             450.00                    ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020         MAT2              0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.
Edited by: Venkatesh Gopalarathnam on Jan 24, 2012 9:48 AM

No, i didn't.
Actually, i enter condition type and amount in sales order manually.
At that time my program which i modified at 'Define And Assign Pricing Procedures' in IMG should be run.
But the result of running is different from my purpose.
To change Condition value of condition type in sales order, are there any solution?

Restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO

Hi
how to restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO
if the material Excisable user can bale to select the No Excise entry tab in MIGO . my requirement .... if the Pop come Please enter Excise Invoice number and Excise Invoice Date user should not change the No Excise how to restrict pls advise me
@sakhi

These are the options provided by SAP keeping in mind Indian Scenario. Sometimes, vendor forget to send excise invoice copy with the material, in such case, you can select 'Only Part I'.
Even if you have maintain vendor excise details & material excise details (By mistake) in J1ID, system will throw an error message, excise invoice value is zero. In such case, we can select option 'No excise entry'.
Your requirement can't be fulfilled in standard way. Even if you go for any Z- developement, you will lose the option.

USER EXIT/ BADI (The price should not be changed in the billing document)

Hi all,
We have given manual entry provision for pricing in Sales order level. But as per the company requirement, the price should not be changed in the billing document. Also the point to be considered is, it is a delivery based billing.
Kindly help me for finding USER EXIT/ BADI to achieve my requirement.
Thanks.

Hi,
Please refer to OSS notes:
105621 - Authorization check for the condition screen - you can use following user-exit includes for changing the condition tab to display only:
    USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION
    USEREXIT_PRICING_CHECK
    USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFIC_LEER
    USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFIC_KZWI
    USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFIC_KOPF
1165078 - Authorization check for conditions or subtotals - from ECC6.0 EHP4 there is a dedicated BAdI for authorization check, however if the user is not aurhorized to change the conditions, the conditions are not visible for the user as well.
Regards,
Marcin

Value from a condition type not to inventorize

Hi friends,
I have a Pricing procedure for Cross company stock transfers.
Supplying plant put some margin on the material price and will supply it.
Now My question is how to avoid the value of the margin getting inventorized(adding to the material price) in the receiving plant
As iam using Std price for this FERT material in the receiving plant , it is trying to inventorize.
I have assigned an Account key and accrual key , for this margin condition type in my pricing procedure.
many thanks
krishna

Hi Manish,
If you dont want it to add to your inventory make that condition stastical in pricing
Put stastical check box tick
Hope this will help you
BR
Diwakar
reward if useful

The condition you are adding has caused the query to be invalid.

I select a column from the structure query: DATA_SET_ID [RDF_STATEMENT]
I enter a condition: = :P_RSTA_RDSE_ID. (This refers to a hidden field on the page. I have confirmed that the correct value is passed.)
I click on 'apply changes' and the page returns:
1 error has occurred
* The condition you are adding has caused the query to be invalid.
Previewing the condition gives: (("RDF_STATEMENT"."DATA_SET_ID" = :P_RSTA_RDSE_ID)) which looks fine.
I've tried a literal - (("RDF_STATEMENT"."DATA_SET_ID" = 1)) - and get the same error.
I've tried converting to an unstructured query and get 'no data found' where the same query in SQL+ returns the desired rows.

Mak,
I will log this as a bug. You may have to recreate the report. Sorry about that.
Scott

The shipment should not allow to save without partner forwarrding agent.

The CR (forwarding agent) partner is set as Mandatory in the configuration for partner procedure TR, but you can save a shipment without this partner function. We are only using Shipment type Z003 and the TR procedure is assigned, and the CR partner is set as mandatory but the system is not requiring it. Why isn't the Mandatory flag working in create mode? If there is a CR on a shipment already, it will not let you delete it, but it will let you create a shipment and save without the CR partner. See Shipmentxxx in DX1, it was created and saved without any partners on the partner tab.
The shipment should not allow to save without partner forwarrding agent.

Hi,
Check config for 'Set Up Partner Determination for Shipments'.
I believe the Partner function for Forwarding agent is FA and here you are talking about CR.
Also make sure you Partner determination procedure is reflecting in your Shipment type.
Regards,
Amit

Target Value of the contract can not exceed ...

Hi All,
Target Value of the contract can not exceed ...
Thanx

Since your refer the Contract for creating the Purchase order, it takes the specified value limit mentioned in the contract. The Value of that particular contract must have reached it purchasing limit. So u cant raise any further PO refering that.
Hope this helps.
Reward if u find it useful

Error Logging In with live Connect Oauth2: invalid_grant The provided value for the 'redirect_uri' is not valid

Hello,
I've been working with oauthwebsecurity to add a few identity providers to work with for authorization. But for some reason i can't get the Oauth2 protocol to work with windows live. I constantly get this error:
{"error":"invalid_grant","error_description":"The provided value for the 'redirect_uri' is not valid. The value must exactly match the redirect URI used to obtain the authorization code."}
I've checked the redirect_uri i send to the initial login request, and i get an access code back. but when i attempt to request the access token in the callback I get the error above even though the redirect_uri i send in the callback request is the same
as the initial log in request. any help or ideas would be appreciated.
Thx,
Ruud

Hello Ruud,
How are you? I just posted a similar problem, however, I vividly understand the process flow. I believe this is a bad design and your can review my post entitled "Azure
Graph API oAuth 2.0 - redirect_uri required - bad design." People are already starting to experience the problem and this wasn't required in the previous version.
I'd like to know Microsoft's feedback on this, particularly someone who has experience / insight into development.

AFTER 60 DAYS THE PL SHOULD NOT ACCUMULATED

DEAR ALL,
MONTHLY PL ELIGIBILITY IS 30 DAYS ,AFTER 60 DAYS THE PL SHOULD NOT ACCUMULATED, IF IT IS ABOVE THE LEAVE WILL LAPSE, IF THEY WANT TO DO THE LEAVE ENCASHMENT, HOW TO DO THE CONFIGURATION CAN U SEND IT TO MY PERSONNEL ID [email protected]

Application is retired, deployments removed, no references. Manual deletion of the applications is not the problem, this works as it should.
However SCCM documentation says "If an application that has no deployments is retired, it will be deleted from the Configuration Manager console after 60 days."
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg682031.aspx
This does not work
Steven Mudde

My trackpad is not responding properly on MacBook Pro. Can move the cursor but not click on icons or similar items.

My trackpad is not responding properly on MacBook Pro. Can move the cursor but not click on icons or similar items.

Intel-based Apple Portables: Troubleshooting unresponsive trackpad issues

Restrict display of Condition Value in the Conditions tab in Purchase Order

Dear All,
We have a requirement that in the Conditions tab the condition value column should be displayed as blank to users other than those related to Purchasing and Costing.
I have checked that there are no standard authorization objects to restrict these.
Any inputs on how to achieve this?
Thanks!
Tejasav

Hi,
you can influence fields using BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST. I don't think that you can disable just your field but you should be able to hide whole tab "Conditions". So you can perform your own authorization check in implementation of this BADI and then display or hide tab.
Cheers

CHAR's value in the query but not in the report??

Hi all,
I loaded master data and crm transaction data from ODS to Cube. The data is in the cube but there is no value in my report when running it. EX: there are some CHARs in my report, I checked those CHARs have value in the query but it shows 'not assign' in my report when I run it. What happen?
Thanks.
J.

Please see below text and also the sent link..
If a navigation attribute is used in an aggregate, this aggregate has to be adjusted using a change run as soon as new values are loaded for the navigation attribute (when master data for the characteristic belonging to the navigation attribute is loaded.) This change run is usually one of the processes that are critical to the system performance of a production BW system. This is why, by avoiding using navigation attributes or not using navigation attributes in aggregates, you can improve the performance of this process. On the other hand, not using navigation attributes in aggregates can lead to poor query response times. The data modeler needs to find the right balance.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/b2/e50138fede083de10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
cheers,
Vishvesh

When I delete emails in gmail, the emails should not get deleted in thunderbird. Please advise. Thank you.

Thank you for taking out time to help. I have thousands of emails in gmail which I keep on deleting. I have configured thunderbird for this email account and it is sunchronized and upto date. If I delete the emails in gmail now, I do not want them to get disappeared from thunderbird. Basically, whatever the emails I delete in gmail and it's trash should not be deleted from thunderbird. Please advise on what steps should be taken. Thanking you once again.

'''If you have a IMAP mail account:'''
You are remotely viewing the folders and emails on the server.
You subscribe to see folders. but this only downloads emailsheaders and downloads the emails upon selection to a temp cache for viewig. They are not stored in your profile.
If you also synchronise then a copy of the server folder is downloaded and stored in the Thunderbird Profile, but synchronised folders keep synchronising so that the server and TB folders are the same.
IT does not matter whether you delete emails via Thunderbird or webmail, you are deleting from the same folders. So, if you delete off server and then discover it has been deleted from Thunderbird, everything is working perfectly.

Value of the condition should not added to NETWR filed of Item & Header

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for