Conditional multi row Table insert

Hello,
I've a multi insert table, with 1 new row (_1B). In some cases I don't want a
new row, because there are enough rows created, how should I prevent the new row on the iterator?
Anyone an idea?
Regards,
Ruben Spekle

Wouldn't it be easyer to just omit the _1B if your condition occurs?
model = "${ ui:conc ( 'yourtablename' , ui:cond ( yourcondition , '_1B' , '' ) ) }"
Anton

Similar Messages

How to set Destination URI of a column in a multi row table

Hi,
I need to programmatically set the destinationURI property of a 'messageStyleText' column in a multi-row table.
I have used the below code in the processRequest of the Controller of the page:
OAViewObject viewObject = (OAViewObject)am.findViewObject("IntSummBackOrdDetVO");
String url = (viewObject.getCurrentRow().getAttribute("ErrorCode")).toString();
url = "/oiphtml/o2c22_"+url+".htm";
OAStaticStyledTextBean errorlink = (OAStaticStyledTextBean) webBean.findChildRecursive("ErrorCode1");
errorlink.setDestination(url);
But this code is not working. Could you please help me in correcting the above code?

user594528 ,
What ur trying to do can be conceptually possible through bound values only as there are many rows in table.Read bound values section in dev guide, to understand the fundamentals.
You can refer to thread to correct ur code:
Re: Unable to set Destination URI to URL stored in a VO attribute
--Mukul

Multi Row Madness: Insert?

Hey Guys,
I've been hitting my head against a cobbled wall trying to figure this one out.
I'm creating a form that needs to support versioning - so instead of ever using an update the form always inserts a copy of the data into the database with an incremented version number.
Frustratingly enough the form requires a dynamic amount of parts - best editting and represented but a tabular form. But MRU and MRD.... where is Multi-Row Insert?
I've tried everything i can to load the information and then change the version - but doing this will result in a ORA-20001: Error in MRU as the data in database is different and cannot "update" the row for old records (when i just want it to copy with a new version number).
The tables work with a header table that had id and version attributes making a combined pk, and the parts table with id and version which references the header table, and a parts_id to uniquely identify itself.
Is there any suggestions on this issue? I was thinking about adding an extra value and adding a trigger to do the inserting instead - but i fear this approach may change the information in the current version (i'm not that familiar with oracle databases... so prefer to try to find a solution in apex).
I'm using 2.2.
cheers,
Alex

But MRU and MRD.... where is Multi-Row Insert?
The MRU process does an update for existing rows and insert for new rows (that were added using the Add Row button)
I was thinking about adding an extra value and adding a trigger to do the inserting instead
Yes, a row-level trigger on the underlying table would be the best way to approach this problem. Let the APEX MRU and MRD processes do their job and your row-level trigger can keep inserting rows into a separate audit/history table with structure identical to the main table (plus sequence generated version number).
Something like
create table mytable_hist as select 'U' dml_action, 1 version_no,a.* from mytable a where 1=2;
create or replace trigger mytrig
after insert or update or delete on mytable
for each row
declare
l_action varchar2(1);
begin
if inserting then l_action := 'I';
elsif updating then l_action := 'U';
elsif deleting then l_action := 'D';
end if;
insert into mytable_hist
values
l_action,
version_no_seq.nextval,
nvl(:new.col1,:old.col1),
nvl(:new.col2,:old.col2),
nvl(:new.col3,:old.col3),
end;
/

Fill multi row before insert

hello guys I want to fill a block with multiple rows before inserting the rows data are from 2 blocks in the form I tried to use next_record , down but they are all restricted here an example of what I want to do
I have block1 , block2 and block3 and I want to fill block3 with the first row of each block before inserting the data in the block3
what should I do?
Thanks in advance guys

But MRU and MRD.... where is Multi-Row Insert?
The MRU process does an update for existing rows and insert for new rows (that were added using the Add Row button)
I was thinking about adding an extra value and adding a trigger to do the inserting instead
Yes, a row-level trigger on the underlying table would be the best way to approach this problem. Let the APEX MRU and MRD processes do their job and your row-level trigger can keep inserting rows into a separate audit/history table with structure identical to the main table (plus sequence generated version number).
Something like
create table mytable_hist as select 'U' dml_action, 1 version_no,a.* from mytable a where 1=2;
create or replace trigger mytrig
after insert or update or delete on mytable
for each row
declare
l_action varchar2(1);
begin
if inserting then l_action := 'I';
elsif updating then l_action := 'U';
elsif deleting then l_action := 'D';
end if;
insert into mytable_hist
values
l_action,
version_no_seq.nextval,
nvl(:new.col1,:old.col1),
nvl(:new.col2,:old.col2),
nvl(:new.col3,:old.col3),
end;
/

ODI Multi Target tables insert using single interface

Hi
I am facing an issue in ODI with multiple target tables insert.
I have a source table in Sybase ASE and want to insert the data in two different target tables which are in Sybase IQ.
Any suggestion would be appreciated !
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
Sanchit Aggarwal

Have you tried using IKM Oracle Multi Table Insert?

Transposing column names to row for a multi row table

Hi
I have a table some thing like this that needs to be transposed.
FIELD_POPULATED First_NM**Last_NM**Mi_NM*
A_NULL 0 0 0
A_NOT_NULL 120 120 120
B_NULL 0 0 0
B_NOT_NULL 0 0 0
The above table has to be transposed as
column_name*A_NULL**A_NOT_NULL**B_NULL* B_NOT_NULL
FIRST_NM 0 120 0 0
Last_NM 0 120 0 0
Mi_NM 0 120 0 0
I am working oracle on 11g. Any help is greatly appreciated

Hi,
See this thread:
Re: Help with PIVOT query (or advice on best way to do this)

Multi Row Update set fields disabled

Hi
I have a multi-row table and the functionality I need is when the user changes a value in a drop down list it either enables or disables certain fields.
I have set the depends on value for my fields to the drop down list and checked the clear/refresh box. On each field I have tried
#{bindings.dropdown.inputValue=='codeA'} and also
#{row.dropdown=='codeA'}
Each of these work as when the form is first loaded and the first row selected, the correct fields are disabled. However if I add a new row or change the dropdown, nothing happens.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Rich

Steven,
I have tried this. It simply adds in row.MyList. Here is the field that in generates
<af:selectOneChoice id="MinimumEntryFtTerritoryCode" value="#{row.FtTerritoryCode}"
partialTriggers = "MinimumEntryMetCode" required="#{(bindings.MinimumEntryFtTerritoryCode.mandatory) and (!MinimumEntryCollectionModel.newRow)}" readOnly="#{!(data.StudentsPageDef.StudentsCustomerStatus.inputValue=='ACTIVE')}" disabled="#{row.MetCode!='PRE_ASS'}" valign="top">
<af:selectItem value="" label="" rendered="#{!((bindings.MinimumEntryFtTerritoryCode.mandatory) and (!MinimumEntryCollectionModel.newRow))}" />

<af:forEach var="row2" items="#{bindings.FndTerritoriesVOLookup.rangeSet}" >
<af:selectItem label="#{row2.TerritoryShortName}" value="#{row2.TerritoryCode}"/>
</af:forEach>

</af:selectOneChoice>
It all looks like it should work but when I change MetCode in the list, everything stays disabled.
Cheers
Rich

Multi-row insert in master-detail tables

Hi, I'm using jdev 10.1.3.2 with jheadstart and my problem is:
I hava a master-detail structure, both are tables and my goal is that I want multi insert (exactly 3) in master and detail table when user makes new order(some business scenario). I cannot create rows in master or detail VO by overriding create() method because its entities have complex primary keys and some part of this key is populated by the user with lov. So I set in jhs new rows to 3 and checked multi-row insert allowed but the problem is that overall I can only create rows in master table after I submit form. I want to create row in master table and fill rows in detail table, and after that I want to have opportunity to create second (or even third) row in master table and fill rows in detail table.
thanks for help.
Piotr

See JHS DevGuide: 3.2.1. Review Database Design:
If you are in the position to create or modify the database design, make sure all
tables have a non-updateable primary key, preferably consisting of only one
column. If you have updateable and/or composite primary keys, introduce a
surrogate primary key by adding an ID column that is automatically populated.
See section 3.2.4 Generating Primary Key Values for more info. Although ADF
Business Components can handle composite and updateable primary keys, this
will cause problems in ADF Faces pages. For example, an ADF Faces table
manages its rows using the key of the underlying row. If this key changes,
unexpected behavior can occur in your ADF Faces page. In addition, if you want
to provide a drop down list on a lookup tables to populate a foreign key, the
foreign key can only consists of one column, which in turn means the referenced
table must have a single primary key column.
Groeten,
HJH

Issues in Table with Multi-Row Insert

I have created a master detail screens using jheadstart on 2 separate pages, Master in the Form layout and detail in the Table Layout with multi-row insert, update and delete flags ON. Have set the New Rows count = 2.
Issue 1
If I try to delete any existing rows, it gives error for new rows saying value is required for the mandatory fields. It should just ignore the new rows if I have not updated any values for any attributes in the those row(As it does for non Master-Detail Table layout). I guess this might be happening because the jheadstart code is setting the foreign key for new rows the detail, but not resetting the status of the rows back to INITIALIZED.
I also noticed that the create() of underlying EO is getting called for those blank rows when I click on 'Save' button, even if I have not changed any data in those rows.
Issue 2
When I try to select the new rows also for deletion, I am getting a '500 Internal Server Error' with following stack trace... This is also happening for normal (non Master-Detail) Table layout.
java.lang.IllegalStateException: AdfFacesContext was already released or had never been attached. at oracle.adf.view.faces.context.AdfFacesContext.release(AdfFacesContext.java:342) at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.webapp.AdfFacesFilterImpl.doFilter(AdfFacesFilterImpl.java:253) at oracle.adf.view.faces.webapp.AdfFacesFilter.doFilter(AdfFacesFilter.java:87)
Issue 3
I have put some validation code in the validate() method in the MyEntityImpl.java class.
The validate method seems tobe getting called lots of times, in my case 20 times, where the new rows are just 2.
Environment:
Jdeveloper 10.1.3, JHeadStart 10.1.3 build 78, Windows XP
thanks

Thanks for the reply.
Issue 1:
What I have observed that in case of multi-row select enabled tables, the blank rows do not have any data. This is because the EO's create() method is called only when we post the data using 'Save' button. Thus the Foreign Keys are also not setup. This is a correct behavior since create() and FK setups etc should get done only if the user has inputted any value in the new rows and thus intend to insert new data into the table.
I am able to find the exact cause of this issue. It is happening because in the details table, I have a column which needs tobe shown as checkbox. Since we can only bind checkbox to an Boolean attribute in VO, I have created a transient attribute of type Boolean, which basically calls the getter/setter of actual attribute doing the String "Y"/"N" to true/false conversion. Here is code for the transient attribute getter/setter
public Boolean getDisplayOnWebBoolean() {
return "Y".equals(getDisplayOnWeb()) ? Boolean.TRUE : Boolean.FALSE;
public void setDisplayOnWebBoolean(Boolean value) {
if(Boolean.TRUE.equals(value))
setDisplayOnWeb("Y");
else
setDisplayOnWeb("N");
Now when I click on the "Save" button, the setter for the boolean field is getting called with the value = false and this is resulting into the row being maked as dirty and thus the validation for the required attributes is getting executed and failing.
Issue 2:
Confirmed that correct filter-mapping entries are present in the web.xml.
Now when I select the new blank rows for deletion and click save, following exception is thrown:
java.lang.ClassCastException: oracle.jheadstart.controller.jsf.bean.NewTableRowBean at oracle.jheadstart.controller.jsf.bean.JhsCollectionModel.getRowsToRemove(JhsCollectionModel.java:412) at oracle.jheadstart.controller.jsf.bean.JhsCollectionModel.doModelUpdate(JhsCollectionModel.java:604) at oracle.jheadstart.controller.jsf.lifecycle.JhsPageLifecycle.processModelUpdaters(JhsPageLifecycle.java:541) at oracle.jheadstart.controller.jsf.lifecycle.JhsPageLifecycle.validateModelUpdates(JhsPageLifecycle.java:571)
thanks - rutwik

ADF Editable Table : CANNOT Insert Multi Rows , Please hellppppssss

Hi All,
Our customer requirement is being able to insert Multi Rows in an Editable Table and submit ALL of them with just one Click ?
Is it Really Possible ?
I have tried, even I can insert three Empty Rows and Fill them all with values, when I press Submit ONLY one row will be submitted, the other TWO will become BLANK again, is this my code is wrong ?
Or this is limitation of ADF Editable Table ?
Here is my codes, I have tried two ways, all same problem :
(1) public String create_action() {
BindingContainer bindings = getBindings();
OperationBinding operationBinding =
bindings.getOperationBinding("Create");
Object result = operationBinding.execute();
if (!operationBinding.getErrors().isEmpty()) {
return null;
return null;
public String myCreate_action() {
create_action();
create_action();
create_action();
return null;
(2) public String createMultiRows() {
DCBindingContainer dcbc = (DCBindingContainer)getBindings();
//get iterator binding
DCIteratorBinding ib = (DCIteratorBinding)dcbc.get("DeptView1Iterator");
// get viewobject
ViewObject vo = ib.getViewObject();
System.out.println(vo.getCurrentRowIndex());
vo.clearCache();
int currentRowIndex = vo.getRowCount() -1;
Row row1 = vo.createRow();
row1.setNewRowState(Row.STATUS_NEW);
vo.insertRowAtRangeIndex(++currentRowIndex, row1);
Row row2 = vo.createRow();
row2.setNewRowState(Row.STATUS_NEW);
vo.insertRow(row2);
Row row3 = vo.createRow();
row3.setNewRowState(Row.STATUS_NEW);
vo.insertRow(row3);
return null;
Please help... I am stuck ...
Thank you very much,
xtanto

Xtanto,
Could you try changing
bindings.getOperationBinding("Create");to
bindings.getOperationBinding("CreateInsert");in your first example to see if it fixes your problem?
Regards,
John

Multi-row uipdate with an insert into another table [I think]

Folks,
I'm trying to get a multi row region with a checkbox against each row. When a user checks a box I want to insert a corresponding row into another table. So I've tried to simplify the questions and distill the problem down using the EMP table.
So, here goes:
I have table EMPS, which looks like this:
EMPNO     Number
FIRSTNAME     Varchar2(9)
LASTNAME     Varchar2(10)
HIREDATE     Date
I have table EMP_CANDIDATES, which looks like this:
EMPNO     Number
SELECTION_DATE     Date
NOTES Varchar2(53)
- I want to create a multi-row region based on EMPS, with a checkbox on each employee row.
- The user should be able to select any number of employees in the region and then press submit.
- on-submit there needs to be a process, which inserts a record into EMP_CANDIDATES for each checked employee.
I've tried pre-populating a collection with the EMPS records and using apex_item.checkbox to produce a checkbox, using this code:
=============
if apex_collection.collection_exists(p_collection_name=>'EMPS') then
apex_collection.delete_collection(p_collection_name=>'EMPS');
end if;
apex_collection.create_collection_from_query(
p_collection_name=>'EMPS',
p_query=>'select
p.empno,
p.hiredate,
p.firstname,
p.lastname,
null selection
from emps p');
=========
I can create a report region on this using tthe following SQL:
select c001 empno
, c002 hiredate
, c003 firstname
, c004 lastname
,apex_item.checkbox(1,c005) selection
from apex_collections
where collection_name ='EMPS'
======
So how do I now get a MRU that will insert a row into EMP_CANDIDATES for each checked row in my region? Or have I gone about this the wrong way?
TFH
Derek

Hi Derek,
Firstly, your checkbox should be on the c001 field as this is the one that contains your empno.
Then, you need a page process that can be triggered by a button. The process should be set to run "On submit (After computations and validations)" and the PL/SQL code would be something like:
DECLARE
v_empno NUMBER;
BEGIN
IF HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01.COUNT = 0 THEN
raise_application_error(-20001, 'Please select at least one employee!');
END IF;
FOR i IN 1.. HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01.COUNT LOOP
v_empno := TO_NUMBER(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i));
INSERT INTO EMP_CANDIDATES VALUES (v_empno, whateverdate, whatevernotes);
END LOOP;
END;
This will firstly count the items that have been ticked - if there aren't any, the user gets an error message. If there is at least one item ticked, the code will loop through these, get the empno relating to the ticked box and insert a record into the emp_candidates table. Please note that no account is taken here of any validation on this second table - if you need to ensure, for example, uniqueness of records in this table, you will have to update the above to perform this validation.
Regards
Andy

Any general tips on getting better performance out of multi table insert?

I have been struggling with coding a multi table insert which is the first time I ever use one and my Oracle skills are pretty poor in general so now that the query is built and works fine I am sad to see its quite slow.
I have checked numerous articles on optimizing but the things I try dont seem to get me much better performance.
First let me describe my scenario to see if you agree that my performance is slow...
its an insert all command, which ends up inserting into 5 separate tables, conditionally (at least 4 inserts, sometimes 5 but the fifth is the smallest table). Some stats on these tables as follows:
Source table: 5.3M rows, ~150 columns wide. Parallel degree 4. everything else default.
Target table 1: 0 rows, 27 columns wide. Parallel 4. everything else default.
Target table 2: 0 rows, 63 columns wide. Parallel 4. default.
Target table 3: 0 rows, 33 columns wide. Parallel 4. default.
Target table 4: 0 rows, 9 columns wide. Parallel 4. default.
Target table 5: 0 rows, 13 columns wide. Parallel 4. default.
The parallelism is just about the only customization I myself have done. Why 4? I dont know it's pretty arbitrary to be honest.
Indexes?
Table 1 has 3 index + PK.
Table 2 has 0 index + FK + PK.
Table 3 has 4 index + FK + PK
Table 4 has 3 index + FK + PK
Table 5 has 4 index + FK + PK
None of the indexes are anything crazy, maybe 3 or 4 of all of them are on multiple columns, 2-3 max. The rest are on single columns.
The query itself looks something like this:
insert /*+ append */ all
when 1=1 then
into table1 (...) values (...)
into table2 (...) values (...)
when a=b then
into table3 (...) values (...)
when a=c then
into table3 (...) values (...)
when p=q then
into table4(...) values (...)
when x=y then
into table5(...) values (...)
select .... from source_table
Hints I tried are with append, without append, and parallel (though adding parallel seemed to make the query behave in serial, according to my session browser).
Now for the performance:
It does about 8,000 rows per minute on table1. So that means it should also have that much in table2, table3 and table4, and then a subset of that in table5.
Does that seem normal or am I expecting too much?
I find articles talking about millions of rows per minute... Obviously i dont think I can achieve that much... but maybe 30k or so on each table is a reasonable goal?
If it seems my performance is slow, what else do you think I should try? Is there any information I may try to get to see if maybe its a poorly configured database for this?
P.S. Is it possible I can run this so that it commits every x rows or something? I had the heartbreaking event of a network issue giving me this sudden "ora-25402: transaction must roll back" after it was running for 3.5 hours. So I lost all the progress it made... have to start over. plus i wonder if the sheer amount of data being queued for commit/rollback is causing some of the problem?
Edited by: trant on Jun 27, 2011 9:29 PM

Looks like there are about 54 sessions on my database, 7 of the sessions belong to me (2 taken by TOAD and 4 by my parallel slave sessions and 1 by the master of those 4)
In v$session_event there are 546 rows, if i filter it to the SIDs of my current session and order my micro_wait_time desc:
510     events in waitclass Other     30670     9161     329759     10.75     196     3297590639     1736664284     1893977003     0     Other
512     events in waitclass Other     32428     10920     329728     10.17     196     3297276553     1736664284     1893977003     0     Other
243     events in waitclass Other     21513     5     329594     15.32     196     3295935977     1736664284     1893977003     0     Other
223     events in waitclass Other     21570     52     329590     15.28     196     3295898897     1736664284     1893977003     0     Other
241     row cache lock     1273669     0     42137     0.03     267     421374408     1714089451     3875070507     4     Concurrency
241     events in waitclass Other     614793     0     34266     0.06     12     342660764     1736664284     1893977003     0     Other
241     db file sequential read     13323     0     3948     0.3     13     39475015     2652584166     1740759767     8     User I/O
241     SQL*Net message from client     7     0     1608     229.65     1566     16075283     1421975091     2723168908     6     Idle
241     log file switch completion     83     0     459     5.54     73     4594763     3834950329     3290255840     2     Configuration
241     gc current grant 2-way     5023     0     159     0.03     0     1591377     2685450749     3871361733     11     Cluster
241     os thread startup     4     0     55     13.82     26     552895     86156091     3875070507     4     Concurrency
241     enq: HW - contention     574     0     38     0.07     0     378395     1645217925     3290255840     2     Configuration
512     PX Deq: Execution Msg     3     0     28     9.45     28     283374     98582416     2723168908     6     Idle
243     PX Deq: Execution Msg     3     0     27     9.1     27     272983     98582416     2723168908     6     Idle
223     PX Deq: Execution Msg     3     0     25     8.26     24     247673     98582416     2723168908     6     Idle
510     PX Deq: Execution Msg     3     0     24     7.86     23     235777     98582416     2723168908     6     Idle
243     PX Deq Credit: need buffer     1     0     17     17.2     17     171964     2267953574     2723168908     6     Idle
223     PX Deq Credit: need buffer     1     0     16     15.92     16     159230     2267953574     2723168908     6     Idle
512     PX Deq Credit: need buffer     1     0     16     15.84     16     158420     2267953574     2723168908     6     Idle
510     direct path read     360     0     15     0.04     4     153411     3926164927     1740759767     8     User I/O
243     direct path read     352     0     13     0.04     6     134188     3926164927     1740759767     8     User I/O
223     direct path read     359     0     13     0.04     5     129859     3926164927     1740759767     8     User I/O
241     PX Deq: Execute Reply     6     0     13     2.12     10     127246     2599037852     2723168908     6     Idle
510     PX Deq Credit: need buffer     1     0     12     12.28     12     122777     2267953574     2723168908     6     Idle
512     direct path read     351     0     12     0.03     5     121579     3926164927     1740759767     8     User I/O
241     PX Deq: Parse Reply     7     0     9     1.28     6     89348     4255662421     2723168908     6     Idle
241     SQL*Net break/reset to client     2     0     6     2.91     6     58253     1963888671     4217450380     1     Application
241     log file sync     1     0     5     5.14     5     51417     1328744198     3386400367     5     Commit
510     cursor: pin S wait on X     3     2     2     0.83     1     24922     1729366244     3875070507     4     Concurrency
512     cursor: pin S wait on X     2     2     2     1.07     1     21407     1729366244     3875070507     4     Concurrency
243     cursor: pin S wait on X     2     2     2     1.06     1     21251     1729366244     3875070507     4     Concurrency
241     library cache lock     29     0     1     0.05     0     13228     916468430     3875070507     4     Concurrency
241     PX Deq: Join ACK     4     0     0     0.07     0     2789     4205438796     2723168908     6     Idle
241     SQL*Net more data from client     6     0     0     0.04     0     2474     3530226808     2000153315     7     Network
241     gc current block 2-way     5     0     0     0.04     0     2090     111015833     3871361733     11     Cluster
241     enq: KO - fast object checkpoint     4     0     0     0.04     0     1735     4205197519     4217450380     1     Application
241     gc current grant busy     4     0     0     0.03     0     1337     2277737081     3871361733     11     Cluster
241     gc cr block 2-way     1     0     0     0.06     0     586     737661873     3871361733     11     Cluster
223     db file sequential read     1     0     0     0.05     0     461     2652584166     1740759767     8     User I/O
223     gc current block 2-way     1     0     0     0.05     0     452     111015833     3871361733     11     Cluster
241     latch: row cache objects     2     0     0     0.02     0     434     1117386924     3875070507     4     Concurrency
241     enq: TM - contention     1     0     0     0.04     0     379     668627480     4217450380     1     Application
512     PX Deq: Msg Fragment     4     0     0     0.01     0     269     77145095     2723168908     6     Idle
241     latch: library cache     3     0     0     0.01     0     243     589947255     3875070507     4     Concurrency
510     PX Deq: Msg Fragment     3     0     0     0.01     0     215     77145095     2723168908     6     Idle
223     PX Deq: Msg Fragment     4     0     0     0     0     145     77145095     2723168908     6     Idle
241     buffer busy waits     1     0     0     0.01     0     142     2161531084     3875070507     4     Concurrency
243     PX Deq: Msg Fragment     2     0     0     0     0     84     77145095     2723168908     6     Idle
241     latch: cache buffers chains     4     0     0     0     0     73     2779959231     3875070507     4     Concurrency
241     SQL*Net message to client     7     0     0     0     0     51     2067390145     2000153315     7     Network
(yikes, is there a way to wrap that in equivalent of other forums' tag?)
v$session_wait;
223     835     PX Deq Credit: send blkd     sleeptime/senderid     268697599     000000001003FFFF     passes     1     0000000000000001     qref     0     00     1893977003     0     Other     0     10     WAITING
241     22819     row cache lock     cache id     13     000000000000000D     mode     0     00     request     5     0000000000000005     3875070507     4     Concurrency     -1     0     WAITED SHORT TIME
243     747     PX Deq Credit: send blkd     sleeptime/senderid     268697599     000000001003FFFF     passes     1     0000000000000001     qref     0     00     1893977003     0     Other     0     7     WAITING
510     10729     PX Deq Credit: send blkd     sleeptime/senderid     268697599     000000001003FFFF     passes     1     0000000000000001     qref     0     00     1893977003     0     Other     0     2     WAITING
512     12718     PX Deq Credit: send blkd     sleeptime/senderid     268697599     000000001003FFFF     passes     1     0000000000000001     qref     0     00     1893977003     0     Other     0     4     WAITING
v$sess_io:
223     0     5779     5741     0     0
241     38773810     2544298     15107     27274891     0
243     0     5702     5688     0     0
510     0     5729     5724     0     0
512     0     5682     5678     0     0

VLD-1119: Unable to generate Multi-table Insert statement for some or all t

Hi All -
I have a map in OWB 10.2.0.4 which is ending with following error: -
VLD-1119: Unable to generate Multi-table Insert statement for some or all targets.*
Multi-table insert statement cannot be generated for some or all of the targets due to upstream graphs of those targets are not identical on "active operators" such as "join".*
The map is created with following logic in mind. Let me know if you need more info. Any directions are highly appreciated and many thanks for your inputs in advance: -
I have two source tables say T1 and T2. There are full outer joined in a joiner and output of this joined is passed to an expression to evaluate values of columns based on
business logic i.e. If T1 is available than take T1.C1 else take T2.C1 so on.
A flag is also evaluated in the expression because these intermediate results needs to be joined to third source table say T3 with different condition.
Based on value taken a flag is being set in the expression which is used in a splitter to get results in three intermediate tables based on flag value evaluated earlier.
These three intermediate tables are all truncate insert and these are unioned to fill a final target table.
Visually it is something like this: -
T1 -- T3 -- JOINER1
| -->Join1 (FULL OUTER) --> Expression -->SPLITTER -- JOINER2 UNION --> Target Table
| JOINER3
T2 --
Please suggest.

I verified that their is a limitation with the splitter operator which will not let you generate a multi split having more than 999 columns in all.
I had to use two separate splitters to achieve what I was trying to do.
So the situation is now: -
Siource -> Split -> Split 1 -> Insert into table -> Union1---------Final tableA
Siource -> Split -> Split 2 -> Insert into table -> Union1

Is there a way to determine which rows are inserted in JDT1 table by the system automatically?

Hi,
Is there a way to determine which rows are inserted in JDT1 table by the system automatically? Example, many GLs which are mapped in GL Account Determination, like Foreign Exchange Gain / Loss, Rounding Account, etc. are inserted by the system automatically in the Journal Entry on various scenarios, like during Incoming Payment, etc.
Which SQL query can give me those rows? Basically the WHERE condition should be based on which column or multiple columns in JDT1 table?
Thanks.

Hi Rajesh,
I'm not entirely sure but I think the TransId is the same in the header that belongs to the transaction.
OINV.TransId = JDT1.TransId
Best regards,
Pedro Magueija

Multi table insert

Hello boys,
I would like to do an insert into 3 tables:
insert into t1
if found insert into t2
if not found insert into t3.
So 2 out of 3 tables will end up with data.
I would like to do it in 1 multi table insert.
I can't use selects from the destination tables cause they are in the terabytes. I tried a number of combinations of primary keys error logging tables ("log errors reject limit unlimited") but without any success.
Any ideas?

Hello Exor,
You said,
insert into t1
if found insert into t2
if not found insert into t3.
What is found condition? What are you checking and have you looked into insert all clause if that what you needed. Remember you can have complex join in your select and insert into 3 or 4 table based your "found" condition. This might be fastest way to move data into 3 tables instead of using cursor or bulk collect.
INSERT ALL
   WHEN order_total < 1000000 THEN
      INTO small_orders
   WHEN order_total > 1000000 AND order_total < 2000000 THEN
      INTO medium_orders
   WHEN order_total > 2000000 THEN
      INTO large_orders
   SELECT order_id, order_total, sales_rep_id, customer_id
      FROM orders;Regards

Conditional multi row Table insert

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for