Conflict Handler Start (Attn: Rob Wollen)
Hi,
We have functionality for user sessions, which needs to be shared in
a cluster. We do the following
a). Implement a entity bean, which represents the user session. This
entity bean is created when the user logs in and remains alive as long
as
the weblogic cache keeps it around. (We do not persist this entity bean
ex., EJBStore does not do anything).
b). We have 2 windows NT machines.
On each machine we run a pair of weblogic servers.
ex., Machine A has server 1,2
Machine B has server 3,4
Servers 1,3 run on cluster mode, where as servers 2,4 do not
run within the cluster. Also in servers 1,3 nothing is deployed, Only in
servers 2,4 the UserSessionEJB is deployed.
c). When a user logs in, Let us say he contacts server 2, an instance of
UserSessionEJB is created on server 2 with a primary key of user_id.
Also
the user_id, instance is bound in the clustered jndi tree (servers 1,3).
Next time the user logs in, our code checks in the clustered jndi tree,
to see
if there is a instance bound for a particular user_id, If so it retrieves
the session
and talks to the particular session.
Currently we are getting the following problem,
Occasionally the cluster servers would produce the following error
message.
Conflict Handler start....
After that our servers start behaving erratically. I am not sure,
what is
going on?, Can anyone shed some light on this. See attached weblogic.log
file
for the clustered jndi tree servers.
Thanks,
-Venkat.
[weblogic.log]
Were the RMI objects compiled with the the WebLogic rmic "-clusterable" option?
Stephen Earl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> <<<
> (the only time this is
> > not considered a conflict is when the objects are RMI objects -- e.g., an
> EJB
> > Home).
> >>>
>
> This is strange because the objects that seem to be causing the
> ConflictHandler message are RMI objects.
>
> Steve...
>
> Robert Patrick <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Stephen,
> >
> > ConflictHandlers are there to resolve conflicts in the naming tree. For
> > example, if you create a normal serializable Java object in one of your
> servers
> > and try to bind it into JNDI, a copy of the object will be made and bound
> into
> > the each server's JNDI tree. Therefore, if you deploy this "binding of
> the
> > object" in all servers in the cluster, the second server will be trying to
> > create this object and bind it into the tree with the same name as the
> > replicated object that was created by the first server (the only time this
> is
> > not considered a conflict is when the objects are RMI objects -- e.g., an
> EJB
> > Home).
> >
> > If you do not want the object being bound into JNDI to be replicated,
> there is a
> > property you can pass to the InitialContext constructor that will prevent
> any
> > object bound via that context from being replicated. The property is
> defined on
> > the weblogic.jndi.WLContext class as the constant (i.e., static final)
> > REPLICATE_BINDINGS and setting this to false will prevent the replication
> of the
> > bindings.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> > Robert
> >
> > Stephen Earl wrote:
> >
> > > Well... I want to know exactly what the ConflictHandlers are doing.
> > >
> > > Steve...
> > >
> > > "Venkat Krishnamoorthy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > Steve,
> > > > I am not clear on ur posting, can u clarify?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Venkat.
> > > >
> > > > Stephen Earl wrote in message <[email protected]>...
> > > > >This isn't a solution... instead another question.
> > > > >
> > > > >What exactly are the ConflictHandlers doing??? I only want HTTP
> sessions
> > > > >replicated in the cluster all other services should be pinned to the
> WL
> > > > >instance in which they were instanciated or started. Are the
> > > > >ConflictHandlers handling some replication across the cluster???
> > > > >
> > > > >Steve...
> > > > >
> > > > >"Venkat Krishnamoorthy" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > >news:[email protected]...
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We have functionality for user sessions, which needs to be
> shared
> > > in
> > > > >> a cluster. We do the following
> > > > >>
> > > > >> a). Implement a entity bean, which represents the user session.
> This
> > > > >> entity bean is created when the user logs in and remains alive
> as
> > > > long
> > > > >> as
> > > > >> the weblogic cache keeps it around. (We do not persist this
> entity
> > > > >bean
> > > > >> ex., EJBStore does not do anything).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> b). We have 2 windows NT machines.
> > > > >> On each machine we run a pair of weblogic servers.
> > > > >> ex., Machine A has server 1,2
> > > > >> Machine B has server 3,4
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Servers 1,3 run on cluster mode, where as servers 2,4
> do
> > > not
> > > > >> run within the cluster. Also in servers 1,3 nothing is
> deployed,
> > > Only
> > > > >in
> > > > >> servers 2,4 the UserSessionEJB is deployed.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> c). When a user logs in, Let us say he contacts server 2, an
> instance
> > > > of
> > > > >> UserSessionEJB is created on server 2 with a primary key of
> > > user_id.
> > > > >> Also
> > > > >> the user_id, instance is bound in the clustered jndi tree
> (servers
> > > > >1,3).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Next time the user logs in, our code checks in the clustered
> jndi
> > > > >tree,
> > > > >> to see
> > > > >> if there is a instance bound for a particular user_id, If so it
> > > retrieves
> > > > >> the session
> > > > >> and talks to the particular session.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Currently we are getting the following problem,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Occasionally the cluster servers would produce the following
> error
> > > > >> message.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Conflict Handler start....
> > > > >>
> > > > >> After that our servers start behaving erratically. I am not
> > > sure,
> > > > >> what is
> > > > >>
> > > > >> going on?, Can anyone shed some light on this. See attached
> > > weblogic.log
> > > > >> file
> > > > >>
> > > > >> for the clustered jndi tree servers.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> -Venkat.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
Similar Messages
-
Oracle Streams Update conflict handler not working
Hello,
I've been working on the Oracle streams and this time we've to come up with Update conflict handler.
We are using Oracle 11g on Solaris10 env.
So far, we have implemented bi-directional Oracle Streams Replication and it is working fine.
Now, when i try to implement Update conflict handler - it executed successfully but it is not fulfilling the desired functionality.
Here are the steps i performed:
Steap -1:
create table test73 (first_name varchar2(20),last_name varchar2(20), salary number(7));
ALTER TABLE jas23.test73 ADD (time TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE);
insert into jas23.test73 values ('gugg','qwer',2000,SYSTIMESTAMP);
insert into jas23.test73 values ('papa','sdds',2050,SYSTIMESTAMP);
insert into jas23.test73 values ('jaja','xzxc',2075,SYSTIMESTAMP);
insert into jas23.test73 values ('kaka','cvdxx',2095,SYSTIMESTAMP);
insert into jas23.test73 values ('mama','rfgy',1900,SYSTIMESTAMP);
insert into jas23.test73 values ('tata','jaja',1950,SYSTIMESTAMP);
commit;
Step-2:
conn to strmadmin/strmadmin to server1:
SQL> ALTER TABLE jas23.test73 ADD SUPPLEMENTAL LOG DATA (ALL) COLUMNS;
Step-3
SQL>
DECLARE
cols DBMS_UTILITY.NAME_ARRAY;
BEGIN
cols(1) := 'first_name';
cols(2) := 'last_name';
cols(3) := 'salary';
cols(4) := 'time';
DBMS_APPLY_ADM.SET_UPDATE_CONFLICT_HANDLER(
object_name => 'jas23.test73',
method_name => 'MAXIMUM',
resolution_column => 'time',
column_list => cols);
END;
Step-4
conn to strmadmin/strmadmin to server2
SQL>
DECLARE
cols DBMS_UTILITY.NAME_ARRAY;
BEGIN
cols(1) := 'first_name';
cols(2) := 'last_name';
cols(3) := 'salary';
cols(4) := 'time';
DBMS_APPLY_ADM.SET_UPDATE_CONFLICT_HANDLER(
object_name => 'jas23.test73',
method_name => 'MAXIMUM',
resolution_column => 'time',
column_list => cols);
END;
Step-5
And now, if i try to update the value of salary, then it is not getting handled by update conflict handler.
update jas23.test73 set salary = 1500,time=SYSTIMESTAMP where first_name='papa'; --server1
update jas23.test73 set salary = 2500,time=SYSTIMESTAMP where first_name='papa'; --server2
commit; --server1
commit; --server2
Note: Both the servers are into different timezone (i hope it wont be any problem)
Now, after performing all these steps - the data is not same at both sites.
Error(DBA_APPLY_ERROR) -
ORA-26787: The row with key ("FIRST_NAME", "LAST_NAME", "SALARY", "TIME") = (papa, sdds, 2000, 23-DEC-10 05.46.18.994233000 PM +00:00) does not exist in ta
ble JAS23.TEST73
ORA-01403: no data found
Please help.
Thanks.
Edited by: gags on Dec 23, 2010 12:30 PMHi,
When i tried to do it on Server-2:
SQL> ALTER TABLE jas23.test73 ADD SUPPLEMENTAL LOG DATA (ALL) COLUMNS;
it throws me an error,
Error -
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-32588: supplemental logging attribute all column exists -
Streams Conflict Handler Date Format
Hi.
Into my Conflict Handler PL/SQL I have this instruction:
tmp := lcr.get_value('NEW','DT_ULT_VERIFICACAO'); rc := tmp.getDATE(v_DT_ULT_VERIFICACAO);
IF (v_DT_ULT_VERIFICACAO is not null) THEN
cmdupd := cmdupd||',DT_ULT_VERIFICACAO='||'TO_DATE('''||v_DT_ULT_VERIFICACAO||''','''||'DD/MM/RR'||''')'; END IF;
The result after execution is:
UPDATE HW_ITENS SET USER_UNF_ID=13,CD_ITEM=4,NR_INMETRO=32037347,NR_SERIE='ME - 0295',
DT_ULT_VERIFICACAO=TO_DATE('04-DEC-09','DD/MM/RR'),NR_ULT_VERIFICACAO=21036627,TP_ULT_RESULTADO=4
WHERE ITM_ID = 2836955 and SRV_UNF_ID = 13
As we can see, I received a date format of DD/MON/AA. This is not good to my work. I need a date format of DD/MM/AA.
How can I change this when using a Apply Conflict Handler ?
Thank in advance.
JoseFormigaDid you checked the setting of the database NLS_DATA_FORMAT if the column was date or NLS_TIMESTAMP_FORMAT for timestamp.
Check the setting of V$NLS_PARAMETERS.
set pages 66 lines 190
SQL> select * from V$NLS_PARAMETERS
PARAMETER VALUE
NLS_LANGUAGE AMERICAN
NLS_TERRITORY AMERICA
NLS_CURRENCY $
NLS_ISO_CURRENCY AMERICA
NLS_NUMERIC_CHARACTERS .,
NLS_CALENDAR GREGORIAN
NLS_DATE_FORMAT DD-MON-RR
NLS_DATE_LANGUAGE AMERICAN
NLS_CHARACTERSET AL32UTF8
NLS_SORT BINARY
NLS_TIME_FORMAT HH.MI.SSXFF AM
NLS_TIMESTAMP_FORMAT DD-MON-RR HH.MI.SSXFF AM
NLS_TIME_TZ_FORMAT HH.MI.SSXFF AM TZR
NLS_TIMESTAMP_TZ_FORMAT DD-MON-RR HH.MI.SSXFF AM TZR
NLS_DUAL_CURRENCY $
NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET AL16UTF16
NLS_COMP BINARY
NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS CHAR
NLS_NCHAR_CONV_EXCP FALSE -
Oracle Replication update conflict handler creating notifications
Hi All,
I want to use an update conflict handler that overwrites the records in the destination database, while notifying the dba about the conflict by creating a log entry to a log file (alert log or other custom log file).
I know that I can use prebuilt overwrite update conflict handler to overwrite the conflicting record. As far as I know there is no way to create a log entry using this prebuilt conflict handlers.
Is there a way to create a log entry via prebuilt conflict handlers?
Or else I can use pl/sql to create a log entry and a pl/sql can be used as conflict handler.
But how can I create a pl/sql overwrite conflict handler?
Thank you,
Sasika.You must create your own update conflict handler.
Conflict handler is a PL/SQL procedure (usually in package). For given conflict type is defined what parameters this procedure must have.
And in procedure you simply put locig you need:
1/ write a log entry
2/ update (overwrite) data in table -
Enabling client side conflict handling after download of application
Hello,
we got a custom MI-Application in which we do conflict handling in the mobile application.
Now that we have over a hundred productive clients, we discovered that for many (not all) of the clients, the application level conflict handling is not enabled.
This seems to be due to the fact that the download (and install) of the application has been done while the setting for conflict handling was set to "Framework" instead of "Application".
The merepMeta.xml file however does contain the setting.
Is it possible and if yes how, to enable the application level conflict handling after installation?
best regards
Niels OberbäumerHi Niels,
so I am confused. Lets first clarify if we talk about the same feature. The config handling I have in mind will be configured in MEREP_PD - Synchronizer Tab. There you have the settings available in the last column for each syncBO. One of the settings is called: SKIP_CONFLICT. By default it is not set, so the conflict handling takes place in the server and if the data was changed on Backend and client after the last sync, it throws an error.
To change this behaviour, you set the X into the colum in the SKIP_CONFLICT line and after that the middleware will handle the conflict and send the data through even it was changed on both sides.
Is this the thing we talk about? So what do you mean with MCD then? This handling has no setting in MCD and it should be independend from MEREPSBUILDEr.
Oh - I see now where it is stored... This value is does not get a reset with Client data reset - it comes from the MCD - no, sorry, in that case you need to uninstall and reinstall the App to get the value active on these devices. Sorry, but this is based on where the value is stored, there is not another way to reset that value unfortunately that I am aware of.
Regards,
Oliver -
Find Conflicts between start and end time
I have a table appointment (appointment_id, start, end , Location) will hundreds of records like below
appointment_id start
end Location
1 2015-04-29 10:00:00.000 2015-04-29 12:00:00.000
ABC
2 2015-03-29 09:00:00.000 2015-03-29 13:00:00.000
XYZ
3 2015-03-29 10:00:00.000 2015-03-29 11:00:00.000
XYZ
if you see appointment id 2 and 3 they are conflicting with same location
appointment id2 starts at 9 am and ends at 1pm ,
but appointment id3 also reserved same day & same location start at 10am and ends at 11 am ..
this should not be possible ....
can you help in finding how many such conflicts are there in the appointment table ?
i will have to find a report...
ThanksHi coolguy123SQL,
Regarding your description, does the appointments happened in the same prefixed locations with a time span overlap mean a conflict? If my understanding is correct, you may reference the below code.
DECLARE @myTable TABLE (appointment_id INT, startDateTime DATETIME, endDateTime DATETIME, location VARCHAR(10))
INSERT INTO @myTable
SELECT 1, '2015-04-29 10:00:00.000', '2015-04-29 12:00:00.000', 'ABC' UNION ALL
SELECT 2, '2015-03-29 09:00:00.000', '2015-03-29 09:30:00.000', 'XYZ-123' UNION ALL
SELECT 3, '2015-03-29 10:00:00.000', '2015-03-29 11:00:00.000', 'XYZ-456' UNION ALL
SELECT 4, '2015-03-29 11:00:00.000', '2015-03-29 13:00:00.000', 'XYZ-789'
;WITH CTE AS
SELECT appointment_id,startDateTime,endDateTime,location,
CASE WHEN CHARINDEX('-',location)=0 THEN location ELSE SUBSTRING(location,1,CHARINDEX('-',location)-1) END AS locationID FROM @myTable
CTE2 AS
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY locationID ORDER BY startDateTime) AS seq FROM CTE
SELECT
c.appointment_id conflict_appmt_id1,c.startDateTime startDateTime1,c.endDateTime endDateTime1,c.location location1,
t.appointment_id conflict_appmt_id2,t.startDateTime startDateTime2,t.endDateTime endDateTime2,t.location location2
FROM CTE2 c JOIN CTE2 t ON c.locationID=t.locationID and c.endDateTime>=t.startDateTime AND c.seq<t.seq
If you have any question, feel free to let me know.
Eric Zhang
TechNet Community Support -
0Person to 0employee loading, how to handle start and end date
Hi
I need help on some basic understanding of time dependent master data object.
In my scenario i am loading 0employee and 0Person from R/3. I need to update 0employee from 0person.
0employee
BEGDA ENDDA PERNR Position....................So many fields
10.10.2001 10.10.2004 8000123 Associate
11.10.2004 10.10.2008 8000123 Consultant
11.10.2008 31.12.9999 8000123 Senior Consultant
0Person
BEGDA ENDDA PERNR City....................So many fields
10.10.2001 10.10.2003 8000123 Singapore
11.10.2003 10.10.2007 8000123 Tokyo
11.10.2007 31.12.9999 8000123 Newyork
As the begining and end date are different i can't simply read City from 0person into 0employee. If i go for checking the city for the start and end date in 0employee, i will get multiple records ( If try to get city for 0employee's first record, i will get 2 city Singapore and Tokyo).
Please help me out how to handle this ...... i think i am missing somelink somewhere
Thanks
Tripple kHi Srini
Yes i need to have parallel flow for both and in the cube where my reporting will be on monthly basis i need to read these 2 master data and get the required attributes ( considering last/first day of that month as per the requirement).......but i am just wondering this is common scenario....while there are so many threads written for populating 0employee from 0person......don't they have such requirement.....
Thanks
Tripple k -
Exchange/Outlook reccuring meeting single conflicts handling
Hello,
we run Exchange 2010 SP3 and mainly Outlook 2010.
On Exchange we have some shared resources, e.g. meeting rooms.
These rooms can be booked, obvoiusly, as ressource for meetings within outlook appointements.
But there is an issue when one tries to book such a room for a reccurent meeting and at one of the planned dates the room is already booked. We do not allow conflicting meeting requests on these ressources. So, in additon if I want to book room1 for Mo - Fri
from 10am - 11am and this room is arleady booked on Wednesday 10 - 11 my whole ressource booking request fails, resp. is rejected. So, I canot book this room on Mo, Tu, Th and Fri but not on We. Is this by design or is there a chance to sort this issue out
by some triggers, settings?
If I only book the room for one week, this might be possible to be handled manaully, but what if I want to book the room for the whole next year every Monday? I cnanot overview what happens to this room over the whole year period.
kind regards,
DieterThe key lies in configure the settings for ConflictPercentageAllowed and
MaximumConflictInstances. The below blog post describes this very well.
Automatic Processing of Recurring Meeting Requests with Conflicting Instances
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2011/02/07/3411956.aspx
Martina Miskovic -
How to handle starting of external processes with Runtime.exec() properly
hi people,
you find a lot about starting external processes with the Runtime class in every forum.
-> that the stdout of the started processes has to be redirected and read
due to os buffer problems
-> that calling batches is done by starting the interpreter and the batch as parameter (cmd.exe, /bin/sh,..)
-> that the created process doesn't have an os environment
-> ...
but what if you don't know anything about the started process.
what if you only want only to start an external process. if you don't want to wait til waitfor() returns and if you don't read the streams of the created processes, the os stdout buffer will overflow immediately an the started process will be blocked.
you can read the stdout of the started process, but what if the process does print nothing to stdout, and your bufferreader.readLine() will block ?
you can do this (read buffer, waitFor()) in an separate thread, but the thread lives til the started process will finish, so maybe you got dozens of senseless thread ?
So, what is an effective and good way to start external programs/processes if you don't know about them.
so i would be grateful for an answer
regards
AlenI realize that's a pat answer, but it's true. Spawing off another program without being able to predict its behavior is dangerous.
But anyway, as I understand it creating a new process is relatively expensive. The cost of creating new threads to read the process's I/O and later garbage collecting those threads when the process dies, probably isn't much of an additional burden. -
Conflict Handler acceptClient error
When calling the acceptClient method on a conflict I get the error below.
The acceptServer method works just fine - and I am lost...
TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null object reference.
at mx.data::ConflictResolver/updateMessageForAcceptClient()[C:\depot\flex\branches\enterpris e_corfu_rc\frameworks\projects\data\src\mx\data\ConflictResolver.as:458]
at mx.data::ConflictResolver/acceptClientForPullConflict()[C:\depot\flex\branches\enterprise _corfu_rc\frameworks\projects\data\src\mx\data\ConflictResolver.as:316]
at mx.data::ConflictResolver/acceptClient()[C:\depot\flex\branches\enterprise_corfu_rc\frame works\projects\data\src\mx\data\ConflictResolver.as:84]
at mx.data::Conflict/acceptClient()[C:\depot\flex\branches\enterprise_corfu_rc\frameworks\pr ojects\data\src\mx\data\Conflict.as:239]
at org.arauser.blackbelt.agency.delegates::ContactsDelegate/conflictHandler()[E:\projects\ag ency\flex_src\org\arauser\blackbelt\agency\delegates\ContactsDelegate.as:36]
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
at mx.data::ConcreteDataService/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::dispatchConflict Event()[C:\depot\flex\branches\enterprise_corfu_rc\frameworks\projects\data\src\mx\data\Co ncreteDataService.as:2520]
at mx.data::DataStore/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::processConflict()[C:\depot \flex\branches\enterprise_corfu_rc\frameworks\projects\data\src\mx\data\DataStore.as:2539]
at mx.data::CommitResponder/result()[C:\depot\flex\branches\enterprise_corfu_rc\frameworks\p rojects\data\src\mx\data\CommitResponder.as:371]
at mx.rpc::AsyncRequest/acknowledge()[E:\dev\3.1.0\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\AsyncR equest.as:74]
at NetConnectionMessageResponder/resultHandler()[E:\dev\3.1.0\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx \messaging\channels\NetConnectionChannel.as:491]
at mx.messaging::MessageResponder/result()[E:\dev\3.1.0\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\messa ging\MessageResponder.as:199]When calling the acceptClient method on a conflict I get the error below.
The acceptServer method works just fine - and I am lost...
TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null object reference.
at mx.data::ConflictResolver/updateMessageForAcceptClient()[C:\depot\flex\branches\enterpris e_corfu_rc\frameworks\projects\data\src\mx\data\ConflictResolver.as:458]
at mx.data::ConflictResolver/acceptClientForPullConflict()[C:\depot\flex\branches\enterprise _corfu_rc\frameworks\projects\data\src\mx\data\ConflictResolver.as:316]
at mx.data::ConflictResolver/acceptClient()[C:\depot\flex\branches\enterprise_corfu_rc\frame works\projects\data\src\mx\data\ConflictResolver.as:84]
at mx.data::Conflict/acceptClient()[C:\depot\flex\branches\enterprise_corfu_rc\frameworks\pr ojects\data\src\mx\data\Conflict.as:239]
at org.arauser.blackbelt.agency.delegates::ContactsDelegate/conflictHandler()[E:\projects\ag ency\flex_src\org\arauser\blackbelt\agency\delegates\ContactsDelegate.as:36]
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
at mx.data::ConcreteDataService/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::dispatchConflict Event()[C:\depot\flex\branches\enterprise_corfu_rc\frameworks\projects\data\src\mx\data\Co ncreteDataService.as:2520]
at mx.data::DataStore/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::processConflict()[C:\depot \flex\branches\enterprise_corfu_rc\frameworks\projects\data\src\mx\data\DataStore.as:2539]
at mx.data::CommitResponder/result()[C:\depot\flex\branches\enterprise_corfu_rc\frameworks\p rojects\data\src\mx\data\CommitResponder.as:371]
at mx.rpc::AsyncRequest/acknowledge()[E:\dev\3.1.0\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\AsyncR equest.as:74]
at NetConnectionMessageResponder/resultHandler()[E:\dev\3.1.0\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx \messaging\channels\NetConnectionChannel.as:491]
at mx.messaging::MessageResponder/result()[E:\dev\3.1.0\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\messa ging\MessageResponder.as:199] -
NEED HELP IN CONFLICT HANDLER ERROR ORA-01403: no data found
Hi All,
I am using Oracle Streams to replicate the data...
I need to update the records on the destination with some particular condition like if USER_COUNTRY = 'XXX' then the data need to be updated in the destination side else skip ...
I wrote the procedure ..below .. the data is not replicating and found the below error from dba_apply_error..
ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-06512: at "SYS.LCR$_ROW_RECORD", line 419
Table called history_row_lcrs is created in the strmadmin to store the lcr values...
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE proc_test(in_any sys.anydata)IS
lcr sys.lcr$_row_record;
rc pls_integer;
v_type varchar2(20);
col_1 sys.anydata;
lcr_usercountry varchar2(20);
TRANS varchar2(20);
skip_routine Exception;
BEGIN
rc:=in_any.GetObject(lcr);
v_type:=lcr.get_command_type();
col_1:=lcr.get_value('NEW','USER_COUNTRY');
rc:=col_1.GetVarchar2(lcr_usercountry);
for x in ( select user_country from TEST.TESTREP1
where USER_COUNTRY=lcr_usercountry)
Loop
IF (x.USER_COUNTRY = 'XXX')
THEN
insert into strmadmin.history_row_lcrs VALUES (SYSDATE, lcr.GET_SOURCE_DATABASE_NAME(), lcr.GET_COMMAND_TYPE(),
lcr.GET_OBJECT_OWNER(), lcr.GET_OBJECT_NAME(), lcr.GET_TAG(), lcr.GET_TRANSACTION_ID(), lcr.GET_SCN(),
lcr.GET_COMMIT_SCN,lcr.GET_VALUES('old'), lcr.GET_VALUES('new', 'n'));
lcr.EXECUTE(true);
ELSE
Raise Skip_routine;
END IF;
END Loop;
Exception
when skip_routine Then
null;
END;
BEGIN
DBMS_APPLY_ADM.SET_DML_HANDLER(
object_name => 'TEST.TESTREP1',
object_type => 'TABLE',
operation_name => 'UPDATE',
error_handler => false,
user_procedure => 'STRMADMIN.PROC_TEST',
apply_database_link => NULL,
apply_name => NULL);
END;
Please try to help me if am doing something wrong...because I need to update only one colums am using DML_HANDLER instead of SET_UPDATE_CONFLICT_HANDLER...
Any other inputs are also appreciated...
Thanks In Advance and appreciate for the quick reply...I fired the query, am not getting any output from dbms_output.put_line('..|USER_COUNTRY..');
Is that no data is reading or may be any reason else..
in this table store_id is the primary key ..
SQL> set serveroutput on
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE test(in_any sys.anydata) IS
2 lcr sys.lcr$_row_record;
3 rc pls_integer;
4 v_type varchar2(20);
5 col_1 sys.anydata;
6 col_2 sys.anydata;
7 lcr_usercountry varchar2(20);
8 lcr_storeid number;
9 TRANS varchar2(20);
10 store_id number;
11 USER_COUNTRY varchar2(20);
12
13 BEGIN
14 rc:=in_any.GetObject(lcr);
15 v_type:=lcr.get_command_type();
16 col_1:=lcr.get_value('NEW','USER_COUNTRY');
17 rc:=col_1.GetVarchar2(lcr_usercountry);
18 col_2:=lcr.get_value('NEW','STORE_ID');
19 rc:=col_2.getnumber(lcr_storeid);
20 select user_country into user_country from dev03.testrep1 where user_country=lcr_usercountry and store_id=lcr_storeid;
21 dbms_output.put_line('---------||USER_COUNTRY ||-----------');
22 END;
23 /
Procedure created.
Thanks for your help .... -
Conflicts in DOE when the object does not exist in CDS.
Hi all.
SCENARIO:
I have implemented a SWCV with only a DO ( backend triggered). It has a Node structure with only one child structure.
My DO has three function:
- GETLIST: return a table with objects from R3 identified by WCRN.
- GETDETAIL: For each register from getlist, return a list of child registers with state : IMP or SEÑ.
This state in R3 may be IMP, SEÑ o NORM (but in devices, only I want them in state IMP o SEÑ)
- MODIFY: modify the state for a child register.
EXAMPLE:
For example, I create a parent object in R3 with 3 children registers with state IMP. This parent register with his three children registers are upload to CDS. When I syncronize, I obtain them in my device.
PROBLEM:
The problem starts when I modify the state to NORM of any child register in R3. Then, in DOE, this child register is deleted in CDS becouse as I have said before, the function GETDETAIL only returns registers in state IMPS o SEÑ. Automatically the queue
of my device is update too. Before syncronize my device, I change the state to SEÑ of the tree children registers in PDA. Then when I syncronize, the process tries to update then in CDS but one of this child register does not exist in DOE so I obtain the error text below in DOE:
Mesage: "Cannot update/delete object that does not exist in the CDS; node 'ZMOB_DESC_ETIQUETA' "
Service Name: KEYMAP_SERVICE_BV And in my Device, the child which generated the conflict does not exist (this is oK) but I continue having the others two children registers with the same state that I modified before syncronizing (SEÑ) while in R3 those two states are IMP.
I have tested to modify the 3 posibilities of conflict detection scheme of the DO but the problem continues.
I would like to know if there is any posibility or configuration to obtain the next scenario: when this conflict will occurs, GETDETAIL will run and depending on which source will have preference:
1- DEVICE PREFERENCE - the state from children registers in R3 will be updated to SEÑ.
2 - R3 PREFERENCE - the state from my children registers in the device will be the same as in R3 (IMP).
but never never never never will happens like now ( differente state in R3 and PDA after syncronizing)
Best regards
Edited by: Maria Elena Fernandez on Feb 10, 2010 12:52 PMHi again Oliver.
Are you sure that ROW-LEVEL Conflict handling should detect the row with conflict and download the others two child register trought GETDAIL?
I've just checked it again but it continues without working. After the conflict, none child is downloaded to my device.
According to your two opcions:
1- Imposible to avoid that. It's a customer's requirement that they can modify states by R3 and Devices.
2- Imposible too becouse we've already implemented the swcv in a production scenario. The application is already running and to change the model suppose a long time.
I explain you the scenario again with an graphical example:
INIITIAL STATE: ( Device)
parent structure : ID1(key), date,
child structure: ID1, 1, IMP (status)
ID1, 2, IMP (status)
ID1, 3, IMP (status)
INITIAL STATE ( R3).
ID1(key), date, ....
- ID1, 1, IMP(status)
- ID1, 2, IMP(status)
- ID1, 3, IMP (status)
After this, I modified in R3-> ID1, 1, IMP to ID1, 1, NOR
Then, GETDETAIL starts and deletes that register in DOE.
Now I change the 3 children register in Device
ID1, 1, IMP --> ID1, 1, SEÑ
ID1, 2, IMP --> ID1, 2, SEÑ
ID1, 3, IMP --> ID1, 3, SEÑ
After I syncronice, FINAL STATE ( Device)
parent structure : ID1(key), date, ....
child strucuture:
- ID1, 2, SEÑ (status)
- ID1, 3, SEÑ (status)
FINAL STATE ( R3)
ID1(key), date, ....
- ID1, 1, NORM(status)
- ID1, 2, IMP(status)
- ID1, 3, IMP (status)
And that is the problem, different states between R3 and device. I should need that the state in device for the others two children will be also IMP if R3 has preference or the two children will be SEÑ in R3 if the device has preference. But Now neither children in R3 nor children in Device are updated . Only the first which generate the conflict is deleted from device ( normal because it was still in the queue from the device before syncronice.
Best regards.
Edited by: Maria Elena Fernandez on Feb 11, 2010 8:32 AM
Edited by: Maria Elena Fernandez on Feb 11, 2010 8:43 AM -
Windows Update KB2919355 don't start
Hi,
i'm trying to install the KB2919355 Update since a few days now. I downloaded the installer from the microsoft web page. All other Updates are installed.
If I try to start the Update with a double-click, the Update file starts the extracting and the installation windows appears, but the progressbar won't start to go up.
The log file says there is another installation in progress, but i rebootet the pc and startet the installer directly after that.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks.
CBS.log:
2014-06-03 15:31:35, Info CBS TI: --- Initializing Trusted Installer ---
2014-06-03 15:31:35, Info CBS TI: Last boot time: 2014-06-03 15:23:21.489
2014-06-03 15:31:35, Info CBS Starting TrustedInstaller initialization.
2014-06-03 15:31:35, Info CBS Ending TrustedInstaller initialization.
2014-06-03 15:31:35, Info CBS Starting the TrustedInstaller main loop.
2014-06-03 15:31:35, Info CBS TrustedInstaller service starts successfully.
2014-06-03 15:31:35, Info CBS No startup processing required, TrustedInstaller service was not set as autostart
2014-06-03 15:31:35, Info CBS Startup processing thread terminated normally
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS Starting TiWorker initialization.
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS Ending TiWorker initialization.
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS Starting the TiWorker main loop.
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS TiWorker starts successfully.
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS Universal Time is: 2014-06-03 13:31:36.105
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS Loaded Servicing Stack v6.3.9600.17031 with Core: C:\Windows\winsxs\amd64_microsoft-windows-servicingstack_31bf3856ad364e35_6.3.9600.17031_none_fa50b3979b1bcb4a\cbscore.dll
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CSI 00000001@2014/6/3:13:31:36.105 WcpInitialize (wcp.dll version 0.0.0.6) called (stack @0x7ffd02cd5d35 @0x7ffd02fd2dd7 @0x7ffd02fd2430 @0x7ff60fc1d2df @0x7ff60fc1d9e4 @0x7ffd1fbd2385)
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS Could not load SrClient DLL from path: SrClient.dll. Continuing without system restore points.
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS SQM: Initializing online with Windows opt-in: False
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS SQM: Cleaning up report files older than 10 days.
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS SQM: Requesting upload of all unsent reports.
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS SQM: Failed to start upload with file pattern: C:\Windows\servicing\sqm\*_std.sqm, flags: 0x2 [HRESULT = 0x80004005 - E_FAIL]
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS SQM: Failed to start standard sample upload. [HRESULT = 0x80004005 - E_FAIL]
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS SQM: Queued 0 file(s) for upload with pattern: C:\Windows\servicing\sqm\*_all.sqm, flags: 0x6
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS SQM: Warning: Failed to upload all unsent reports. [HRESULT = 0x80004005 - E_FAIL]
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS NonStart: Set pending store consistency check.
2014-06-03 15:31:36, Info CBS Session: 30375728_609019246 initialized by client WindowsUpdateAgent.
2014-06-03 15:31:40, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, Parent: Microsoft-Windows-Common-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, Disposition = Detect, VersionComp: EQ, ServiceComp: GE, BuildComp: EQ, DistributionComp: GE, RevisionComp: GE, Exist: present
2014-06-03 15:31:40, Info CBS Appl: detectParent: package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, parent found: Microsoft-Windows-Common-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, state: Installed
2014-06-03 15:31:40, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, disposition state from detectParent: Installed
2014-06-03 15:31:40, Info CBS Appl: Evaluating package applicability for package Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, applicable state: Installed
2014-06-03 15:31:40, Info CBS Appl: Evaluating package applicability for package Package_for_KB2919355_RTM~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, applicable state: Installed
2014-06-03 15:31:40, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_1_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, Parent: Microsoft-Windows-ApisetNamespace-Mincore-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, Disposition = Detect, VersionComp: EQ, ServiceComp: EQ, BuildComp: EQ, DistributionComp: GE, RevisionComp: GE, Exist: present
2014-06-03 15:31:40, Info CBS Appl: detectParent: package: Package_1_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, parent found: Microsoft-Windows-ApisetNamespace-Mincore-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, state: Installed
2014-06-03 15:31:40, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_1_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, disposition state from detectParent: Installed
2014-06-03 15:31:40, Info CBS Appl: Evaluating package applicability for package Package_1_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, applicable state: Installed
2014-06-03 15:31:42, Info CSI 00000002 IAdvancedInstallerAwareStore_ResolvePendingTransactions (call 1) (flags = 00000004, progress = NULL, phase = 0, pdwDisposition = @0xa9b0acd1d0
2014-06-03 15:31:42, Info CSI 00000003 Creating NT transaction (seq 1), objectname [6]"(null)"
2014-06-03 15:31:42, Info CSI 00000004 Created NT transaction (seq 1) result 0x00000000, handle @0x24c
2014-06-03 15:31:43, Info CSI 00000005 Poqexec successfully registered in [ml:26{13},l:24{12}]"SetupExecute"
2014-06-03 15:31:43, Info CSI 00000006@2014/6/3:13:31:43.527 Beginning NT transaction commit...
2014-06-03 15:31:43, Info CSI 00000007@2014/6/3:13:31:43.543 CSI perf trace:
CSIPERF:TXCOMMIT;19128
2014-06-03 15:31:43, Info CSI 00000008 CSI Store 728992125632 (0x000000a9bb5112c0) initialized
2014-06-03 15:31:43, Info CSI 00000009@2014/6/3:13:31:43.559 CSI Transaction @0xa9bb670d50 initialized for deployment engine {d16d444c-56d8-11d5-882d-0080c847b195} with flags 00000002 and client id [25]"TI5.30375728_609019246:1/"
2014-06-03 15:31:43, Info CSI 0000000a@2014/6/3:13:31:43.559 CSI Transaction @0xa9bb670d50 destroyed
2014-06-03 15:31:43, Info CBS Appl: Selfupdate, Component: amd64_microsoft-windows-mincoreapinamespace_31bf3856ad364e35_0.0.0.0_none_9345d40e3f833ebc (6.3.9600.17031), elevation:4, lower version revision holder: 6.3.9600.16384
2014-06-03 15:31:43, Info CBS Appl: SelfUpdate detect, component: amd64_microsoft-windows-mincoreapinamespace_31bf3856ad364e35_6.3.9600.17031_none_043e952c12cce236, elevation: 4, applicable: 1
2014-06-03 15:31:43, Info CBS Appl: Package: Package_1_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, Update: 2919355-1_neutral_GDR, Applicable: Applicable, Dis
2014-06-03 15:31:43, Info CBS External EvaluateApplicability, package: Package_1_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, package applicable State: Installed, highest update applicable state: Installed, resulting applicable state:Installed
2014-06-03 15:31:43, Info CBS External EvaluateApplicability, package: Package_for_KB2919355_RTM~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, package applicable State: Installed, highest update applicable state: Installed, resulting applicable state:Installed
2014-06-03 15:31:43, Info CBS External EvaluateApplicability, package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, package applicable State: Installed, highest update applicable state: Installed, resulting applicable state:Installed
2014-06-03 15:32:05, Info CBS Read out cached applicability from TiLight for package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, ApplicableState: 112, CurrentState:32
2014-06-03 15:32:05, Info CBS Read out cached applicability from TiLight for package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, ApplicableState: 112, CurrentState:32
2014-06-03 15:32:05, Info CBS Session: 30375728_906692368 initialized by client WindowsUpdateAgent.
2014-06-03 15:32:06, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Resume and Download Job
2014-06-03 15:32:06, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
2014-06-03 15:32:06, Info DPX Ended DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
2014-06-03 15:32:06, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
2014-06-03 15:32:14, Info DPX Ended DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
2014-06-03 15:32:14, Info DPX CJob::Resume completed with status: 0x0
2014-06-03 15:32:14, Info DPX Ended DPX phase: Resume and Download Job
2014-06-03 15:32:14, Info CBS Opened cabinet package, package directory: \\?\C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda\, sandbox location: \\?\C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda\inst\, cabinet location: \\?\C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda\windows8.1-kb2919355-x64.cab, manifest location: \\?\C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda\inst\update.mum
2014-06-03 15:32:14, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Resume and Download Job
2014-06-03 15:32:14, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
2014-06-03 15:32:19, Info DPX Ended DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
2014-06-03 15:32:19, Info DPX CJob::Resume completed with status: 0x0
2014-06-03 15:32:19, Info DPX Ended DPX phase: Resume and Download Job
2014-06-03 15:32:19, Info DPX Extraction of file: update.ses failed because it is not present in the container.
2014-06-03 15:32:19, Info DPX DpxException hr=0x80070002 code=0x020109
2014-06-03 15:32:19, Info CBS Not able to add file to extract: update.ses [HRESULT = 0x80070002 - ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND]
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, Parent: Microsoft-Windows-Common-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, Disposition = Detect, VersionComp: EQ, ServiceComp: GE, BuildComp: EQ, DistributionComp: GE, RevisionComp: GE, Exist: present
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Appl: detectParent: package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, parent found: Microsoft-Windows-Common-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, state: Installed
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, disposition state from detectParent: Installed
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Appl: Evaluating package applicability for package Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, applicable state: Installed
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Exec: Asynchrous operation, session completes later
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Asynchronous Session: 30375728_906692368 finalized. [HRESULT = 0x00000000 - S_OK]
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Exec: Processing started. Client: WindowsUpdateAgent, Session: 30375728_906692368, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Exec: Using execution sequence: 152
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Reboot mark set
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Winlogon: Registering for CreateSession notifications
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Perf: Entering stage: Planning
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Disabling LKG boot option
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Exec: Creating restore point: Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, current: Resolved, targeted: Resolved
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Client specifies CbsMovePayload, or client is Windows Update, will move payload to system.
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, Parent: Microsoft-Windows-Common-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, Disposition = Detect, VersionComp: EQ, ServiceComp: GE, BuildComp: EQ, DistributionComp: GE, RevisionComp: GE, Exist: present
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Appl: detectParent: package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, parent found: Microsoft-Windows-Common-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, state: Installed
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, disposition state from detectParent: Installed
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info CBS Appl: Evaluating package applicability for package Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, applicable state: Installed
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Resume and Download Job
2014-06-03 15:32:20, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
Windowsupdate.log:
2014-06-03 15:30:13:865 996 4d8 AU ReAttemptDownloadsAsUserIfNecessary, No calls in download progress.
2014-06-03 15:31:29:120 4184 1060 Misc =========== Logging initialized (build: 7.9.9600.16384, tz: +0200) ===========
2014-06-03 15:31:29:120 4184 1060 Misc = Process: C:\Windows\system32\wusa.exe
2014-06-03 15:31:29:120 4184 1060 Misc = Module: C:\Windows\System32\wuapi.dll
2014-06-03 15:31:29:120 4184 1060 COMAPI ----------- COMAPI: IUpdateServiceManager::AddScanPackageService -----------
2014-06-03 15:31:29:120 4184 1060 COMAPI - ServiceName = Eigenständiges Windows Update-Installationsprogramm
2014-06-03 15:31:29:120 4184 1060 COMAPI - ScanFileLocation = C:\a9ec81761db03008d175\wsusscan.cab
2014-06-03 15:31:29:589 996 db4 Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\ScanFile\e75dcd23-f7ef-4508-a48f-1f5881180fe1\Source.cab:
2014-06-03 15:31:29:620 996 db4 Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2014-06-03 15:31:30:105 996 db4 DtaStor Default service for AU is {7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D}
2014-06-03 15:31:30:105 996 db4 IdleTmr Incremented idle timer priority operation counter to 1
2014-06-03 15:31:30:105 4184 1060 COMAPI - Added scan package service, ServiceID = {E75DCD23-F7EF-4508-A48F-1F5881180FE1} Third party service
2014-06-03 15:31:30:120 4184 1060 COMAPI -------------
2014-06-03 15:31:30:120 4184 1060 COMAPI -- START -- COMAPI: Init Search [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-03 15:31:30:120 4184 1060 COMAPI ---------
2014-06-03 15:31:30:120 4184 1060 COMAPI -------------
2014-06-03 15:31:30:120 4184 1060 COMAPI -- START -- COMAPI: Search [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-03 15:31:30:120 4184 1060 COMAPI ---------
2014-06-03 15:31:30:136 996 db4 IdleTmr WU operation (CSearchCall::Init ID 24) started; operation # 13; does use network; is not at background priority
2014-06-03 15:31:30:136 996 db4 IdleTmr Incremented PDC RefCount for Network to 1
2014-06-03 15:31:30:136 996 db4 IdleTmr Incremented idle timer priority operation counter to 2
2014-06-03 15:31:30:292 996 db4 Report *********** Report: Initializing static reporting data ***********
2014-06-03 15:31:30:292 996 db4 Report * OS Version = 6.3.9600.0.0.131088
2014-06-03 15:31:30:292 996 db4 Report * OS Product Type = 0x00000021
2014-06-03 15:31:30:292 996 db4 Report * Computer Brand = FUJITSU
2014-06-03 15:31:30:308 996 db4 Report * Computer Model = PRIMERGY TX100 S3P
2014-06-03 15:31:30:308 996 db4 Report * Platform Role = 1
2014-06-03 15:31:30:308 996 db4 Report * AlwaysOn/AlwaysConnected (AOAC) = 0
2014-06-03 15:31:30:308 996 db4 Report * Bios Revision = V4.6.5.3 R1.10.0 for D3009-B1x
2014-06-03 15:31:30:308 996 db4 Report * Bios Name = BIOS Date: 12/18/12 09:10:43 Ver: 04.06.05
2014-06-03 15:31:30:308 996 db4 Report * Bios Release Date = 2012-12-18T00:00:00
2014-06-03 15:31:30:308 996 db4 Report * Bios Sku Number = S26361-Kxxx-Vyyy
2014-06-03 15:31:30:308 996 db4 Report * Bios Vendor = FUJITSU // American Megatrends Inc.
2014-06-03 15:31:30:308 996 db4 Report * Bios Family =
2014-06-03 15:31:30:308 996 db4 Report * Bios Major Release = 1
2014-06-03 15:31:30:308 996 db4 Report * Bios Minor Release = 10
2014-06-03 15:31:30:308 996 db4 Report * Locale ID = 1031
2014-06-03 15:31:30:323 996 db4 Agent *** START *** Queueing Finding updates [CallerId = wusa Id = 24]
2014-06-03 15:31:30:323 4184 1060 COMAPI <<-- SUBMITTED -- COMAPI: Search [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-03 15:31:30:323 996 10ac Agent *** END *** Queueing Finding updates [CallerId = wusa Id = 24]
2014-06-03 15:31:30:323 996 10ac Agent *************
2014-06-03 15:31:30:323 996 10ac Agent ** START ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = wusa Id = 24]
2014-06-03 15:31:30:323 996 10ac Agent *********
2014-06-03 15:31:30:323 996 10ac Agent * Online = Yes; Ignore download priority = No
2014-06-03 15:31:30:323 996 10ac Agent * Criteria = "DeploymentAction='Installation'"
2014-06-03 15:31:30:323 996 10ac Agent * ServiceID = {E75DCD23-F7EF-4508-A48F-1F5881180FE1} Third party service
2014-06-03 15:31:30:323 996 10ac Agent * Search Scope = {Machine}
2014-06-03 15:31:30:323 996 10ac Agent * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-21-471457994-3697983611-1614797316-500
2014-06-03 15:31:31:230 996 10ac PT +++++++++++ PT: Synchronizing server updates +++++++++++
2014-06-03 15:31:31:230 996 10ac PT + Offline serviceId = {E75DCD23-F7EF-4508-A48F-1F5881180FE1}
2014-06-03 15:31:31:261 996 10ac PT WARNING: Cached cookie has expired or new PID is available
2014-06-03 15:31:44:324 996 10ac PT +++++++++++ PT: Synchronizing extended update info +++++++++++
2014-06-03 15:31:44:324 996 10ac PT + Offline serviceId = {E75DCD23-F7EF-4508-A48F-1F5881180FE1}
2014-06-03 15:31:44:731 996 10ac Agent * Added update {ACBE97D7-83F2-410D-97CF-5A63D58D6923}.501 to search result
2014-06-03 15:31:44:731 996 10ac Agent * Found 1 updates and 52 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 115 out of 238 deployed entities
2014-06-03 15:31:44:731 996 10ac Agent *********
2014-06-03 15:31:44:731 996 10ac Agent ** END ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = wusa Id = 24]
2014-06-03 15:31:44:731 996 10ac Agent *************
2014-06-03 15:31:44:731 996 10ac IdleTmr WU operation (CSearchCall::Init ID 24, operation # 13) stopped; does use network; is not at background priority
2014-06-03 15:31:44:731 996 10ac IdleTmr Decremented PDC RefCount for Network to 0
2014-06-03 15:31:44:731 996 10ac IdleTmr Decremented idle timer priority operation counter to 1
2014-06-03 15:31:44:731 4184 1080 COMAPI >>-- RESUMED -- COMAPI: Search [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-03 15:31:44:840 4184 1080 COMAPI - Updates found = 1
2014-06-03 15:31:44:840 4184 1080 COMAPI ---------
2014-06-03 15:31:44:840 4184 1080 COMAPI -- END -- COMAPI: Search [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-03 15:31:44:840 4184 1080 COMAPI -------------
2014-06-03 15:31:46:574 996 2d0 DnldMgr *********** DnldMgr: Copy update to cache [UpdateId = {C7DE6463-8565-4BC1-A722-6967E7569D32}.501] ***********
2014-06-03 15:31:46:653 996 2d0 DnldMgr Asking handler to generate non-range requests.
2014-06-03 15:31:46:668 996 2d0 Handler Generating request for CBS update C7DE6463-8565-4BC1-A722-6967E7569D32 in sandbox C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda_ctc
2014-06-03 15:31:46:668 996 2d0 Handler Selecting self-contained because update does not have express payload.
2014-06-03 15:31:46:668 996 2d0 Handler Selected payload type is ptSelfContained
2014-06-03 15:31:46:668 996 2d0 Handler Detected download state is dsStart
2014-06-03 15:31:46:668 996 2d0 Handler Adding windows8.1-kb2919355-x64.cab (entire file) to request list.
2014-06-03 15:31:46:668 996 2d0 Handler Request generation for CBS update complete with hr=0x0 and pfResetSandbox=0
2014-06-03 15:31:53:731 996 2d0 Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda_ctc\windows8.1-kb2919355-x64.cab:
2014-06-03 15:32:00:559 996 2d0 Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2014-06-03 15:32:00:591 996 2d0 DnldMgr Asking handler to generate non-range requests.
2014-06-03 15:32:00:591 996 2d0 Handler Generating request for CBS update C7DE6463-8565-4BC1-A722-6967E7569D32 in sandbox C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda_ctc
2014-06-03 15:32:00:591 996 2d0 Handler Selecting self-contained because update does not have express payload.
2014-06-03 15:32:00:591 996 2d0 Handler Selected payload type is ptSelfContained
2014-06-03 15:32:00:591 996 2d0 Handler Detected download state is dsHavePackage
2014-06-03 15:32:05:122 996 2d0 Handler Request generation for CBS update complete with hr=0x0 and pfResetSandbox=0
2014-06-03 15:32:05:263 4184 1060 COMAPI -------------
2014-06-03 15:32:05:263 4184 1060 COMAPI -- START -- COMAPI: Install [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-03 15:32:05:263 4184 1060 COMAPI ---------
2014-06-03 15:32:05:263 4184 1060 COMAPI - Allow source prompts: Yes; Forced: No; Force quiet: No; Attempt close apps if necessary: No
2014-06-03 15:32:05:263 4184 1060 COMAPI - Updates in request: 1
2014-06-03 15:32:05:263 4184 1060 COMAPI - ServiceID = {E75DCD23-F7EF-4508-A48F-1F5881180FE1} Third party service
2014-06-03 15:32:05:263 996 2d0 IdleTmr WU operation (CInstallCall::Init ID 25) started; operation # 27; does not use network; is not at background priority
2014-06-03 15:32:05:263 996 2d0 IdleTmr Incremented PDC RefCount for System to 1
2014-06-03 15:32:05:263 996 2d0 IdleTmr Incremented idle timer priority operation counter to 2
2014-06-03 15:32:05:544 996 2d0 Agent Beginning install of conventional work item
2014-06-03 15:32:05:544 4184 1060 COMAPI - Updates to install = 1
2014-06-03 15:32:05:544 996 1164 Agent *************
2014-06-03 15:32:05:544 4184 1060 COMAPI <<-- SUBMITTED -- COMAPI: Install [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-03 15:32:05:544 996 1164 Agent ** START ** Agent: Installing updates [CallerId = wusa]
2014-06-03 15:32:05:544 996 1164 Agent *********
2014-06-03 15:32:05:544 996 1164 Agent * Updates to install = 1
2014-06-03 15:32:05:544 996 1164 Agent * Title = Update für Windows (KB2919355)
2014-06-03 15:32:05:544 996 1164 Agent * UpdateId = {ACBE97D7-83F2-410D-97CF-5A63D58D6923}.501
2014-06-03 15:32:05:544 996 1164 Agent * Bundles 1 updates:
2014-06-03 15:32:05:544 996 1164 Agent * {C7DE6463-8565-4BC1-A722-6967E7569D32}.501
2014-06-03 15:32:05:794 996 1164 Handler Attempting to create remote handler process as SK\Administrator in session 1
2014-06-03 15:32:05:825 996 1164 DnldMgr Preparing update for install, updateId = {C7DE6463-8565-4BC1-A722-6967E7569D32}.501.
2014-06-03 15:32:05:888 4460 1178 Misc =========== Logging initialized (build: 7.9.9600.16403, tz: +0200) ===========
2014-06-03 15:32:05:888 4460 1178 Misc = Process: C:\Windows\system32\wuauclt.exe
2014-06-03 15:32:05:888 4460 1178 Misc = Module: C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\wuaueng.dll
2014-06-03 15:32:05:888 4460 1178 Handler :::::::::::::
2014-06-03 15:32:05:888 4460 1178 Handler :: START :: Handler: CBS Install
2014-06-03 15:32:05:888 4460 1178 Handler :::::::::
2014-06-03 15:32:05:888 4460 1178 Handler Starting install of CBS update C7DE6463-8565-4BC1-A722-6967E7569D32
2014-06-03 15:32:05:888 4460 1178 Handler CBS session identity: 30375728_906692368
2014-06-03 15:32:06:075 4460 1178 Handler CBS package identity: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14
2014-06-03 15:32:06:091 4460 1178 Handler Installing self-contained with source=C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda\windows8.1-kb2919355-x64.cab, workingdir=C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda\inst
2014-06-03 15:40:13:874 996 4d8 AU User login event timer expired for session id: 1.
2014-06-03 15:40:13:874 996 4d8 AU #############
2014-06-03 15:40:13:874 996 4d8 AU ## START ## AU: Install updates
2014-06-03 15:40:13:874 996 4d8 AU #########
2014-06-03 15:40:13:874 996 4d8 AU # Agent can not allow installs right now because - Another install is in progress
2014-06-03 16:09:36:637 4460 e94 Handler CUHCbsHandler::Cancel called with fReleaseThreadNow=0Ok, now I tried these Steps:
- Starting these commands:
dism /online /remove-package /packagename:Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14
dism /online /cleanup-image /startcomponentcleanup
dism /online /cleanup-image /CheckHealth
dism /online /cleanup-image /RestoreHealth
- KB2919442 is installed
- startet clearcompressionflag.exe
- start the KB2919355 installer
- now I see since 1 hour the installation window, but the status bar didn't start to go up. Nothing happened since 1 hour.
this is the cbs log since starting the installation:
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS TI: --- Initializing Trusted Installer ---
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS TI: Last boot time: 2014-06-04 13:16:05.489
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS Starting TrustedInstaller initialization.
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS Ending TrustedInstaller initialization.
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS Starting the TrustedInstaller main loop.
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS TrustedInstaller service starts successfully.
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS No startup processing required, TrustedInstaller service was not set as autostart
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS Startup processing thread terminated normally
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS Starting TiWorker initialization.
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS Ending TiWorker initialization.
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS Starting the TiWorker main loop.
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS TiWorker starts successfully.
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS Universal Time is: 2014-06-04 11:31:56.834
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS Loaded Servicing Stack v6.3.9600.17031 with Core: C:\Windows\winsxs\amd64_microsoft-windows-servicingstack_31bf3856ad364e35_6.3.9600.17031_none_fa50b3979b1bcb4a\cbscore.dll
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CSI 00000001@2014/6/4:11:31:56.834 WcpInitialize (wcp.dll version 0.0.0.6) called (stack @0x7ffbd5f25d35 @0x7ffbda352dd7 @0x7ffbda352430 @0x7ff631c2d2df @0x7ff631c2d9e4 @0x7ffbf1a92385)
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS Could not load SrClient DLL from path: SrClient.dll. Continuing without system restore points.
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS SQM: Initializing online with Windows opt-in: False
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS SQM: Cleaning up report files older than 10 days.
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS SQM: Requesting upload of all unsent reports.
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS SQM: Failed to start upload with file pattern: C:\Windows\servicing\sqm\*_std.sqm, flags: 0x2 [HRESULT = 0x80004005 - E_FAIL]
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS SQM: Failed to start standard sample upload. [HRESULT = 0x80004005 - E_FAIL]
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS SQM: Queued 0 file(s) for upload with pattern: C:\Windows\servicing\sqm\*_all.sqm, flags: 0x6
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS SQM: Warning: Failed to upload all unsent reports. [HRESULT = 0x80004005 - E_FAIL]
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS NonStart: Set pending store consistency check.
2014-06-04 13:31:56, Info CBS Session: 30375912_2542173815 initialized by client WindowsUpdateAgent.
2014-06-04 13:32:02, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, Parent: Microsoft-Windows-Common-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, Disposition = Detect, VersionComp: EQ, ServiceComp: GE, BuildComp: EQ, DistributionComp: GE, RevisionComp: GE, Exist: present
2014-06-04 13:32:02, Info CBS Appl: detectParent: package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, parent found: Microsoft-Windows-Common-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, state: Installed
2014-06-04 13:32:02, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, disposition state from detectParent: Installed
2014-06-04 13:32:02, Info CBS Appl: Evaluating package applicability for package Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, applicable state: Installed
2014-06-04 13:32:02, Info CBS Appl: Evaluating package applicability for package Package_for_KB2919355_RTM~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, applicable state: Installed
2014-06-04 13:32:02, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_1_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, Parent: Microsoft-Windows-ApisetNamespace-Mincore-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, Disposition = Detect, VersionComp: EQ, ServiceComp: EQ, BuildComp: EQ, DistributionComp: GE, RevisionComp: GE, Exist: present
2014-06-04 13:32:02, Info CBS Appl: detectParent: package: Package_1_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, parent found: Microsoft-Windows-ApisetNamespace-Mincore-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, state: Installed
2014-06-04 13:32:02, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_1_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, disposition state from detectParent: Installed
2014-06-04 13:32:02, Info CBS Appl: Evaluating package applicability for package Package_1_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, applicable state: Installed
2014-06-04 13:32:03, Info CSI 00000002 IAdvancedInstallerAwareStore_ResolvePendingTransactions (call 1) (flags = 00000004, progress = NULL, phase = 0, pdwDisposition = @0xa4bf9d480
2014-06-04 13:32:03, Info CSI 00000003 Creating NT transaction (seq 1), objectname [6]"(null)"
2014-06-04 13:32:03, Info CSI 00000004 Created NT transaction (seq 1) result 0x00000000, handle @0x244
2014-06-04 13:32:04, Info CSI 00000005 Poqexec successfully registered in [ml:26{13},l:24{12}]"SetupExecute"
2014-06-04 13:32:04, Info CSI 00000006@2014/6/4:11:32:04.663 Beginning NT transaction commit...
2014-06-04 13:32:04, Info CSI 00000007@2014/6/4:11:32:04.679 CSI perf trace:
CSIPERF:TXCOMMIT;19948
2014-06-04 13:32:04, Info CSI 00000008 CSI Store 44402478464 (0x0000000a56980d80) initialized
2014-06-04 13:32:04, Info CSI 00000009@2014/6/4:11:32:04.694 CSI Transaction @0xa54f9e420 initialized for deployment engine {d16d444c-56d8-11d5-882d-0080c847b195} with flags 00000002 and client id [26]"TI5.30375912_2542173815:1/"
2014-06-04 13:32:04, Info CSI 0000000a@2014/6/4:11:32:04.694 CSI Transaction @0xa54f9e420 destroyed
2014-06-04 13:32:04, Info CBS Appl: Selfupdate, Component: amd64_microsoft-windows-mincoreapinamespace_31bf3856ad364e35_0.0.0.0_none_9345d40e3f833ebc (6.3.9600.17031), elevation:4, lower version revision holder: 6.3.9600.16384
2014-06-04 13:32:04, Info CBS Appl: SelfUpdate detect, component: amd64_microsoft-windows-mincoreapinamespace_31bf3856ad364e35_6.3.9600.17031_none_043e952c12cce236, elevation: 4, applicable: 1
2014-06-04 13:32:04, Info CBS Appl: Package: Package_1_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, Update: 2919355-1_neutral_GDR, Applicable: Applicable, Dis2014-06-04 13:32:04, Info CBS External EvaluateApplicability, package: Package_1_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, package applicable State: Installed, highest update applicable state: Installed, resulting applicable state:Installed
2014-06-04 13:32:04, Info CBS External EvaluateApplicability, package: Package_for_KB2919355_RTM~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, package applicable State: Installed, highest update applicable state: Installed, resulting applicable state:Installed
2014-06-04 13:32:04, Info CBS External EvaluateApplicability, package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, package applicable State: Installed, highest update applicable state: Installed, resulting applicable state:Installed
2014-06-04 13:33:19, Info CBS Read out cached applicability from TiLight for package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, ApplicableState: 112, CurrentState:0
2014-06-04 13:33:20, Info CBS Read out cached applicability from TiLight for package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, ApplicableState: 112, CurrentState:0
2014-06-04 13:33:20, Info CBS Session: 30375912_3376749782 initialized by client WindowsUpdateAgent.
2014-06-04 13:33:20, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Resume and Download Job
2014-06-04 13:33:20, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
2014-06-04 13:33:20, Info DPX Ended DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
2014-06-04 13:33:20, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
2014-06-04 13:33:29, Info DPX Ended DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
2014-06-04 13:33:29, Info DPX CJob::Resume completed with status: 0x0
2014-06-04 13:33:29, Info DPX Ended DPX phase: Resume and Download Job
2014-06-04 13:33:29, Info CBS Opened cabinet package, package directory: \\?\C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda\, sandbox location: \\?\C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda\inst\, cabinet location: \\?\C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda\windows8.1-kb2919355-x64.cab, manifest location: \\?\C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda\inst\update.mum
2014-06-04 13:33:29, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Resume and Download Job
2014-06-04 13:33:29, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info DPX Ended DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info DPX CJob::Resume completed with status: 0x0
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info DPX Ended DPX phase: Resume and Download Job
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info DPX Extraction of file: update.ses failed because it is not present in the container.
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info DPX DpxException hr=0x80070002 code=0x020109
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Not able to add file to extract: update.ses [HRESULT = 0x80070002 - ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND]
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, Parent: Microsoft-Windows-Common-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, Disposition = Detect, VersionComp: EQ, ServiceComp: GE, BuildComp: EQ, DistributionComp: GE, RevisionComp: GE, Exist: present
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Appl: detectParent: package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, parent found: Microsoft-Windows-Common-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, state: Installed
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, disposition state from detectParent: Installed
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Appl: Evaluating package applicability for package Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, applicable state: Installed
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Exec: Asynchrous operation, session completes later
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Asynchronous Session: 30375912_3376749782 finalized. [HRESULT = 0x00000000 - S_OK]
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Exec: Processing started. Client: WindowsUpdateAgent, Session: 30375912_3376749782, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Exec: Using execution sequence: 157
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Reboot mark set
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Winlogon: Registering for CreateSession notifications
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Perf: Entering stage: Planning
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Disabling LKG boot option
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Exec: Creating restore point: Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, current: Absent, targeted: Absent
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Client specifies CbsMovePayload, or client is Windows Update, will move payload to system.
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, Parent: Microsoft-Windows-Common-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, Disposition = Detect, VersionComp: EQ, ServiceComp: GE, BuildComp: EQ, DistributionComp: GE, RevisionComp: GE, Exist: present
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Appl: detectParent: package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, parent found: Microsoft-Windows-Common-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384, state: Installed
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Appl: detect Parent, Package: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, disposition state from detectParent: Installed
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info CBS Appl: Evaluating package applicability for package Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14, applicable state: Installed
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Resume and Download Job
2014-06-04 13:33:35, Info DPX Started DPX phase: Apply Deltas Provided In File
and this is the windowsupdate log:
2014-06-04 13:31:51:568 3560 d00 Misc =========== Logging initialized (build: 7.9.9600.16384, tz: +0200) ===========
2014-06-04 13:31:51:568 3560 d00 Misc = Process: C:\Windows\system32\wusa.exe
2014-06-04 13:31:51:568 3560 d00 Misc = Module: C:\Windows\System32\wuapi.dll
2014-06-04 13:31:51:568 3560 d00 COMAPI ----------- COMAPI: IUpdateServiceManager::AddScanPackageService -----------
2014-06-04 13:31:51:568 3560 d00 COMAPI - ServiceName = Eigenständiges Windows Update-Installationsprogramm
2014-06-04 13:31:51:568 3560 d00 COMAPI - ScanFileLocation = C:\46be249b623a7645d22fc834c9406a\wsusscan.cab
2014-06-04 13:31:51:615 992 1290 Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\ScanFile\2d656f38-f410-4501-80a7-b0a7b571bcf4\Source.cab:
2014-06-04 13:31:51:631 992 1290 Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2014-06-04 13:31:51:850 992 1290 DtaStor Default service for AU is {7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D}
2014-06-04 13:31:51:850 992 1290 IdleTmr Incremented idle timer priority operation counter to 1
2014-06-04 13:31:51:850 3560 d00 COMAPI - Added scan package service, ServiceID = {2D656F38-F410-4501-80A7-B0A7B571BCF4} Third party service
2014-06-04 13:31:51:865 3560 d00 COMAPI -------------
2014-06-04 13:31:51:865 3560 d00 COMAPI -- START -- COMAPI: Init Search [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-04 13:31:51:865 3560 d00 COMAPI ---------
2014-06-04 13:31:51:865 3560 d00 COMAPI -------------
2014-06-04 13:31:51:865 3560 d00 COMAPI -- START -- COMAPI: Search [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-04 13:31:51:865 3560 d00 COMAPI ---------
2014-06-04 13:31:51:865 992 1290 IdleTmr WU operation (CSearchCall::Init ID 24) started; operation # 14; does use network; is not at background priority
2014-06-04 13:31:51:865 992 1290 IdleTmr Incremented PDC RefCount for Network to 1
2014-06-04 13:31:51:865 992 1290 IdleTmr Incremented idle timer priority operation counter to 2
2014-06-04 13:31:51:865 992 1290 Report *********** Report: Initializing static reporting data ***********
2014-06-04 13:31:51:865 992 1290 Report * OS Version = 6.3.9600.0.0.131088
2014-06-04 13:31:51:865 992 1290 Report * OS Product Type = 0x00000021
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * Computer Brand = FUJITSU
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * Computer Model = PRIMERGY TX100 S3P
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * Platform Role = 1
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * AlwaysOn/AlwaysConnected (AOAC) = 0
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * Bios Revision = V4.6.5.3 R1.10.0 for D3009-B1x
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * Bios Name = BIOS Date: 12/18/12 09:10:43 Ver: 04.06.05
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * Bios Release Date = 2012-12-18T00:00:00
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * Bios Sku Number = S26361-Kxxx-Vyyy
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * Bios Vendor = FUJITSU // American Megatrends Inc.
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * Bios Family =
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * Bios Major Release = 1
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * Bios Minor Release = 10
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Report * Locale ID = 1031
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 1290 Agent *** START *** Queueing Finding updates [CallerId = wusa Id = 24]
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 a30 Agent *** END *** Queueing Finding updates [CallerId = wusa Id = 24]
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 a30 Agent *************
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 a30 Agent ** START ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = wusa Id = 24]
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 a30 Agent *********
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 3560 d00 COMAPI <<-- SUBMITTED -- COMAPI: Search [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 a30 Agent * Online = Yes; Ignore download priority = No
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 a30 Agent * Criteria = "DeploymentAction='Installation'"
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 a30 Agent * ServiceID = {2D656F38-F410-4501-80A7-B0A7B571BCF4} Third party service
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 a30 Agent * Search Scope = {Machine}
2014-06-04 13:31:51:928 992 a30 Agent * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-21-471457994-3697983611-1614797316-500
2014-06-04 13:31:52:162 992 a30 PT +++++++++++ PT: Synchronizing server updates +++++++++++
2014-06-04 13:31:52:162 992 a30 PT + Offline serviceId = {2D656F38-F410-4501-80A7-B0A7B571BCF4}
2014-06-04 13:31:52:178 992 a30 PT WARNING: Cached cookie has expired or new PID is available
2014-06-04 13:32:05:491 992 a30 PT +++++++++++ PT: Synchronizing extended update info +++++++++++
2014-06-04 13:32:05:491 992 a30 PT + Offline serviceId = {2D656F38-F410-4501-80A7-B0A7B571BCF4}
2014-06-04 13:32:05:898 992 a30 Agent * Added update {ACBE97D7-83F2-410D-97CF-5A63D58D6923}.501 to search result
2014-06-04 13:32:05:898 992 a30 Agent * Found 1 updates and 52 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 115 out of 238 deployed entities
2014-06-04 13:32:05:898 992 a30 Agent *********
2014-06-04 13:32:05:898 992 a30 Agent ** END ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = wusa Id = 24]
2014-06-04 13:32:05:898 992 a30 Agent *************
2014-06-04 13:32:05:898 992 a30 IdleTmr WU operation (CSearchCall::Init ID 24, operation # 14) stopped; does use network; is not at background priority
2014-06-04 13:32:05:898 992 a30 IdleTmr Decremented PDC RefCount for Network to 0
2014-06-04 13:32:05:898 992 a30 IdleTmr Decremented idle timer priority operation counter to 1
2014-06-04 13:32:05:898 3560 1258 COMAPI >>-- RESUMED -- COMAPI: Search [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-04 13:32:05:991 3560 1258 COMAPI - Updates found = 1
2014-06-04 13:32:05:991 3560 1258 COMAPI ---------
2014-06-04 13:32:05:991 3560 1258 COMAPI -- END -- COMAPI: Search [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-04 13:32:05:991 3560 1258 COMAPI -------------
2014-06-04 13:32:09:429 992 1290 DnldMgr *********** DnldMgr: Copy update to cache [UpdateId = {C7DE6463-8565-4BC1-A722-6967E7569D32}.501] ***********
2014-06-04 13:32:09:507 992 1290 DnldMgr Asking handler to generate non-range requests.
2014-06-04 13:32:09:507 992 1290 Handler Generating request for CBS update C7DE6463-8565-4BC1-A722-6967E7569D32 in sandbox C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda_ctc
2014-06-04 13:32:09:507 992 1290 Handler Selecting self-contained because update does not have express payload.
2014-06-04 13:32:09:507 992 1290 Handler Selected payload type is ptSelfContained
2014-06-04 13:32:09:507 992 1290 Handler Detected download state is dsStart
2014-06-04 13:32:09:507 992 1290 Handler Adding windows8.1-kb2919355-x64.cab (entire file) to request list.
2014-06-04 13:32:09:523 992 1290 Handler Request generation for CBS update complete with hr=0x0 and pfResetSandbox=0
2014-06-04 13:32:17:961 992 1290 Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda_ctc\windows8.1-kb2919355-x64.cab:
2014-06-04 13:32:27:695 992 1290 Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2014-06-04 13:32:27:774 992 1290 DnldMgr Asking handler to generate non-range requests.
2014-06-04 13:32:27:774 992 1290 Handler Generating request for CBS update C7DE6463-8565-4BC1-A722-6967E7569D32 in sandbox C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda_ctc
2014-06-04 13:32:27:774 992 1290 Handler Selecting self-contained because update does not have express payload.
2014-06-04 13:32:27:774 992 1290 Handler Selected payload type is ptSelfContained
2014-06-04 13:32:27:774 992 1290 Handler Detected download state is dsHavePackage
2014-06-04 13:32:34:711 992 1290 Handler Request generation for CBS update complete with hr=0x0 and pfResetSandbox=0
2014-06-04 13:33:19:651 3560 d00 COMAPI -------------
2014-06-04 13:33:19:651 3560 d00 COMAPI -- START -- COMAPI: Install [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-04 13:33:19:651 3560 d00 COMAPI ---------
2014-06-04 13:33:19:651 3560 d00 COMAPI - Allow source prompts: Yes; Forced: No; Force quiet: No; Attempt close apps if necessary: No
2014-06-04 13:33:19:651 3560 d00 COMAPI - Updates in request: 1
2014-06-04 13:33:19:651 3560 d00 COMAPI - ServiceID = {2D656F38-F410-4501-80A7-B0A7B571BCF4} Third party service
2014-06-04 13:33:19:651 992 1290 IdleTmr WU operation (CInstallCall::Init ID 25) started; operation # 28; does not use network; is not at background priority
2014-06-04 13:33:19:651 992 1290 IdleTmr Incremented PDC RefCount for System to 1
2014-06-04 13:33:19:651 992 1290 IdleTmr Incremented idle timer priority operation counter to 2
2014-06-04 13:33:19:932 992 1290 Agent Beginning install of conventional work item
2014-06-04 13:33:19:932 3560 d00 COMAPI - Updates to install = 1
2014-06-04 13:33:19:932 3560 d00 COMAPI <<-- SUBMITTED -- COMAPI: Install [ClientId = wusa]
2014-06-04 13:33:19:932 992 11fc Agent *************
2014-06-04 13:33:19:932 992 11fc Agent ** START ** Agent: Installing updates [CallerId = wusa]
2014-06-04 13:33:19:932 992 11fc Agent *********
2014-06-04 13:33:19:932 992 11fc Agent * Updates to install = 1
2014-06-04 13:33:19:932 992 11fc Agent * Title = Update für Windows (KB2919355)
2014-06-04 13:33:19:932 992 11fc Agent * UpdateId = {ACBE97D7-83F2-410D-97CF-5A63D58D6923}.501
2014-06-04 13:33:19:932 992 11fc Agent * Bundles 1 updates:
2014-06-04 13:33:19:932 992 11fc Agent * {C7DE6463-8565-4BC1-A722-6967E7569D32}.501
2014-06-04 13:33:20:182 992 11fc Handler Attempting to create remote handler process as SK\Administrator in session 1
2014-06-04 13:33:20:229 992 11fc DnldMgr Preparing update for install, updateId = {C7DE6463-8565-4BC1-A722-6967E7569D32}.501.
2014-06-04 13:33:20:276 4768 1034 Misc =========== Logging initialized (build: 7.9.9600.16403, tz: +0200) ===========
2014-06-04 13:33:20:276 4768 1034 Misc = Process: C:\Windows\system32\wuauclt.exe
2014-06-04 13:33:20:276 4768 1034 Misc = Module: C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\wuaueng.dll
2014-06-04 13:33:20:276 4768 1034 Handler :::::::::::::
2014-06-04 13:33:20:276 4768 1034 Handler :: START :: Handler: CBS Install
2014-06-04 13:33:20:276 4768 1034 Handler :::::::::
2014-06-04 13:33:20:276 4768 1034 Handler Starting install of CBS update C7DE6463-8565-4BC1-A722-6967E7569D32
2014-06-04 13:33:20:292 4768 1034 Handler CBS session identity: 30375912_3376749782
2014-06-04 13:33:20:464 4768 1034 Handler CBS package identity: Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14
2014-06-04 13:33:20:479 4768 1034 Handler Installing self-contained with source=C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda\windows8.1-kb2919355-x64.cab, workingdir=C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\c4f773201ad8a9011e06c2ba0e830cda\inst
What can I try now? -
How to activate Forward Error Handling in SRM
Hello Gurus,
I got an requirement to activate Forward Error Handling in SRM. I have searched on SDN but didn't find appropriate answer on it.
Even I found some link: PI/XI: Forward Error Handling (FEH) for asynchronous proxy calls with the use of Error and Conflict Handler (ECH)
It explains me some points like activating FEH from SRM in SPRO. I have activated the same, plz check the screen shot:
It also follows some development for the same.
Here my concern is, should I follow this document? Does it applicable to all to all the scenarios?
Step 8: it assign object id and type what does it mean...
Does any one can explain me in detail..... Please provide me any document to configure the FEH in SRM.
I am trying to implement FEH in my SRM system. So that when even XML fails due to error, I should be able to reprocess/restart it with some editing to the XML.
My receiver interface for XML is PurchaseRequestERPSourcingRequest_In
I think this is standard one and no need to make any custom code for it. SAP has all ready given solution for it with some Configuration.
I have made some configurations like:
The view FEHV_ACTIVE must have the status active.
In transaction /SAPPO/LOGSYS , the logical system must be defined for the software component SRM-EBP-ESA .
As stated in in the link :
http://esworkplace.sap.com/socoview%28bD1lbiZjPTAwMSZkPW1pbg==%29/render.asp?id=2BAABCB0D30111DC2B8D000F20FCB6A9&fragID=…
Also I have made some configuration according to the Note: 1973768 - No reprocess option is available in FEH for failed in XML in SRM
Resulted, the “Process” button get activated in the XML Post Processing screen.
But can I reprocess my XML with edited value from there..?
All the configuration part of PI is already done .
I wanted to know about the FEH Part. what are the steps i am missing or where i am going wrong ?
Please let me help.
Thanks
Regards
KaranDear Raz,
I have gone with above mentioned note, it explains about creating Custom Proxy and configuration with PI scenario. Even the link in my previous post, explains about the custom proxies and configuration..
I think I should must be descriptive about my issue.
I am trying to implement FEH in my SRM system. So that when even XML fails due to error, I should be able to reprocess/restart it with some editing to the XML.
My receiver interface for XML is PurchaseRequestERPSourcingRequest_In
I think this is standard one and no need to make any custom code for it. SAP has all ready given solution for it with some Configuration.
I have made some configurations like:
The view FEHV_ACTIVE must have the status active.
In transaction /SAPPO/LOGSYS , the logical system must be defined for the software component SRM-EBP-ESA .
As stated in in the link :
http://esworkplace.sap.com/socoview%28bD1lbiZjPTAwMSZkPW1pbg==%29/render.asp?id=2BAABCB0D30111DC2B8D000F20FCB6A9&fragID=…
Also I have made some configuration according to the Note: 1973768 - No reprocess option is available in FEH for failed in XML in SRM
Resulted, the “Process” button get activated in the XML Post Processing screen.
But can I reprocess my XML with edited value from there..?
Can any one tell me, what are the steps I am missing here. As this is my first time to implement FEH, I am confused.
Please let me help.
Regards,
Chandan -
Hi,
I try to put my handler to handler chain (on client side) this way:
// MyService class is generated from WSDL file by Apache-CXF wsdl2java tool.
// Of course MyService extends javax.xml.ws.Service
MyService myService = mew MyService()
myService.setHandlerResolver(new HandlerResolver() {
public List<Handler> getHandlerChain(PortInfo arg0) {
System.out.println(arg0);
List c = new ArrayList();
// MyHandler class prints some text to System.out in handleXXX() methods, it implements javax.xml.ws.handler.Handler
c.add(new MyHandler());
return c;
It is a snippet of StatelessBean - it is client of external services.
When I next try to invoke some service - myService.getPort().run() - the handler is not "notified".
Why it doesn't work???
I tried another way:
((BindingProvider) myService.getPort()).getBinding().getHandlerChain().add(new MyHandler())
It doesn't work too!
And surprise:)
I wrote that code:
((BindingProvider) myService.getPort()).getBinding().getHandlerChain().add(new MyHandler())
System.out.println(
((BindingProvider) myService.getPort()).getBinding().getHandlerChain().size()
What's the result of print?
0 (zero)
Could someone tell me why?
Thx,
Peter.I am having a similiar problem with Vista x32. The preview handler is able to display the pdf, but the fields that were filled in prior to the email are not showing any values, but when you open the pdf with reader the values are there. Below is a more detail account of what is happening. I have contacted the third party dll as well, but thought someone here might have an idea too.
I have a client that is using the a thrid party PDF dll (Syncfusion) to generate and email PDFs reports. There seems to be an issue with the PDFs that are generated and using the built-in PDF Preview Handler for Vista. The scenario is ...
1. User receives an email into Outlook that contains a generated PDF (see image ''01-Opening-Email.jpg'')
2. User clicks on the attachment in Outlook and the preview handler starts up (see image ''02-Loading-Previewer.jpg'')
3. The PDF displayed in the preview handler does not have any of the fields filled out (see image ''03-Report-Loaded-In-Viewer.jpg'')
4. User then right clicks on the PDF (in outlook) and selects to open the PDF with Adobe Acrobat Version 9.0 and the report is displayed with all the fields filled out (see image ''04-Report-Opened-With-Adobe.jpg'')
All of these images are included in the attachment that I have uploaded with this incident. As well, in the RAR file is the PDF that was sent by the system using the PDF dll from Syncfusion. Please let me know if you need any more information from me.
Maybe you are looking for
-
ITunes has detected an iPod that appears to be currupted.
About a week ago my iPod completely froze while I was trying to use it. Since then nothing has worked right. It doesn't seem to charge and it doesn't connect and disconnect correctly. When I try to connect my iPod it either doesn't show up in iTunes
-
ACCESSING a file out of the web contex in JSP
hi i'm a new JSP developer ius eclipse 3.2 environment and tomcat 5. i wanna include an html file from somewhere outside of the web directory (for exapmle "c:\test.html")with <jsp:include> ; but i cant!what shold I do?
-
Help -- I saw a similar topic in IPhoto 8 forum but I am still using version 6.0. I want to resize a photo to a specific custom size. 4.5x4.5 inches. I am not sure how to do this. Tried to convert to pixels under custom constraint and that didn't see
-
Hi, I Am using the t3 protocol to connect to the server in the BEA weblogic, now I am porting my beans to IPLANET, now how can I make use of the Attached piece of java code, the file makes use of the table called "ts_lookup". java file package com.se
-
I can no longer increase or decrease the width of a column as you do in Excel by using the mouse, finding the cross-hair and dragging....and I can no longer drag and fill. Is there a setting for this? I've done both of these things for years, and fo