Copy To Field not Enabled for finance user in GRPO

Hi experts,
One of my client is having a problem with copy to field in GRPO to copy for A/P Invoice can any one help me out how to resolve this issue

Hi
If user having Limited Finance license then user can use only copy from function.
check the SAP B1 LicenseComparisonChart
http://softengineusa.com/wp-content/uploads/SAP_B1_LicenseComparisonChart.pdf
Thanks
Mohammad Imran

Similar Messages

ACL is not enabled for this user OSX 10.5

I am running OS X 10.5 on a Mini Mac.
It was a clean install, everything went smoothly except for configuring the mail server.
I created my users as I normally do using Workgroup manager.
However 2 out of 3 of users I created can not log into the IMAP server.
You get the error message ACL is not enabled for this user.
What is the ACL and how do I enable it ?
Thanks
Nov 9 18:38:12 ns1-2 imap[22604]: badlogin from: [192.168.15.101]. plaintext user: friverr. service ACL is not enabled for this user
Nov 9 18:38:12 ns1-2 imap[22607]: badlogin from: [192.168.15.101]. plaintext user: herbs. service ACL is not enabled for this user
Nov 9 18:38:12 ns1-2 imap[22607]: badlogin from: [192.168.15.101]. plaintext user: friverr. service ACL is not enabled for this user
Nov 9 18:38:12 ns1-2 imap[22604]: badlogin from: [192.168.15.101]. plaintext user: herbs. service ACL is not enabled for this user

Hi there
I had the same problem and I found this post which fixed it:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1244694&tstart=0
Hope it works for you too!
Chris

Thousands of "mail is not enabled for this user"

Someone is sending my domain email to thousands of non existent mail accounts. It's like they are combining every possible prefix to my domain they know of. It's been going on for weeks. The Mail service, however, is not being brought down by this at all. So I don't know what kind of attack this is or how to stop it.
Can someone help me? Below is a minute section of my System log:
Dec 31 15:08:55 nameserver lmtpunix[19165]: warning: unable to post message for user: [email protected], mail is not enabled for this user
Dec 31 15:08:55 nameserver lmtpunix[19165]: warning: unable to post message for user: [email protected], mail is not enabled for this user
Dec 31 15:08:55 nameserver lmtpunix[19165]: warning: unable to post message for user: [email protected], mail is not enabled for this user
Dec 31 15:08:55 nameserver lmtpunix[19165]: warning: unable to post message for user: [email protected], mail is not enabled for this user
Dec 31 15:08:55 nameserver lmtpunix[19165]: warning: unable to post message for user: [email protected], mail is not enabled for this user
Dec 31 15:08:55 nameserver lmtpunix[19165]: warning: unable to post message for user: [email protected], mail is not enabled for this user
Dec 31 15:08:55 nameserver lmtpunix[19165]: warning: unable to post message for user: [email protected], mail is not enabled for this user
Dec 31 15:08:55 nameserver lmtpunix[19165]: warning: unable to post message for user: [email protected], mail is not enabled for this user
Dec 31 15:08:55 nameserver lmtpunix[19165]: warning: unable to post message for user: [email protected], mail is not enabled for this user
------------------

Two possibilities - both fall under the heading 'reconaissance by e-mail'. A spammer or hacker will try 1000's of common names, then look at which ones didn't bounce to determine which ones have accounts on your system.
They then have a comprehensive list of account names on your server, and can proceed to attempt likely passwords for each, or send endless spam to your users. Either one is a Bad Thing, doubly so if you've got any accounts that you created just to test things, and have weak passwords, but you've always counted on nobody knowing they exist.
At one point, I actually had a 'testuser' account that had 'testuser' as the password - I just hadn't remembered to delete it after I was done testing. It's very common for a system to have a couple of these hanging around. I didn't have trouble with it, but looking for and getting rid of these is critical.
Either way, the immdiate solution is to go Server Admin->Mail->Settings->Relay, and add the IP address(es) of the senders to the 'Refuse all messages from these hosts or networks' section. Mail attempts will still show up in your SMTP log, but they'll look like this one I got this morning (one of dozens):
Jan 3 11:07:33 miniserver postfix/smtpd[1440]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[66.180.115.17]: 554 <unknown[66.180.115.17]>: Client host rejected: Access denied; from=<[email protected]> to=<[email protected]> proto=SMTP helo=<xptwfs.gov>
Next is to take a look at your password policies - if you've got strong password policies (must include characters and numbers, must be 7 characters or longer, etc., you're probably OK, but if anyone has weak passwords, or god forbid, uses their userid as their password, you're pretty vulnerable.
It's also worth noting that someone with a full list of your users has a fair number of tools for improved odds of phishing, or spear-phishing, where they create finely targeted mails that say things like 'Bob Smith told me to contact you for your password', and look very real. A warning mail to your users to remind them that they need to keep passwords secret, and be cautious about mail, even if it appears to know something about them, would be good. I wouldn't specify that you've been recon'd, just a general 'New Year Security Reminder' or some such.
Hope this helps!

Calendaring not enabled for all users

OK, I am sure I have overlooked something, but why do some of my user have Calendaring enabled when I look at End User Information on the CUPS Server and some do not? All users are setup with the same profiles. But I can't find where to enable it for the other users.
Thanks in advance,
Doug

Calendaring is enabled by the end user-
In CUPC
File>Preserences>Status>Show me as "in a Meeting"
In CCMUSER Options
https://CUPSSERVER:8443/ccmuser/showHome.do
User Options>Preferences>Calendar Settings
I'm not sure if there is a way to do it from the Admin side....

Delta field not enabled for selection in generic data source

Hi
I have created a generic data source for the table VBFA....and for the delta pick up i have put the delta option as CALDAY on the field ERDAT...and i have selected that field for the selection option. but after i made it delta enabled the selection option got disabled.
Now when i check the info package delta selection tab that date column is not apperaing.
But when i have to run the info package for the first i dont want all the data as it has a huge set of data.
I wanted to take only this months data.
So is there any option to be set to enable this selection in info package.
please suggest.
Regards
Shilpa

Hi there,
That's the stardard behaviour. If you use delta based om ERDAT, that field won't be available for selecting.
You could for example try to build a view over VBFA, and let the field ERDAT there and another field, for example ZERDAT (that is just another alias for ERDAT). Create the delta based onyour view over the field (ERDAT), but you can still control the restrictions over the extractore with your ZERDAT.
I don't know if this is possible, this is only an assumption.
Another option could be first to create an extractor based on the table VBFA but without delta, that field ERDAT would be available. Do your full data restricting it, and after that, change your datasource to use deltas based on ERDAT. It will be unavailable than, but since you've already loaded previous full data, you could than use your delta like it is. But here, remember, your deltas will bring new and change data based on ERDAT. If it brings delta based on changed data over ERDAT to a record that you didn't brought over your full (only some data), it will be incorrect records.
Also just an assumption, did not try it.
Diogo.

Agent "User" is not enabled for enterprise voice. Only Enterprise Voice users can receive Response Group calls.

I have standard edition Lync 2013 deployed. I have also enabled enterprise Voice for all my users.
When I try to create a response group under group tab, I add the enterprise voice enabled users to the group and click on commit I get this warning:
Agent "User" is not enabled for enterprise voice. Only Enterprise Voice users can receive Response Group calls.
This is clearly a glitch since the users are already enabled for enterprise voice. Has anyone come across this issue before?
Thanks

Have you tried restarting the Response Group service? Are you able to add any EV enabled users to this RGS?
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
Lync Sorted blog

My app went from working fine to: Id field not defined for cfc Path.to.my.ORMCfCPag when I restarted

Hi everyone,
I have a CF9 ORM problem that I haven't been able to figure out and thought I'd see if you had any idea. I have seen a few postings talking about a "similar" problem but none of them correctly resolved this particular issue. I appreciate any help you can offer.
I recently created a CF9 app where I generated scripted ORM CFCs for my app using ColdFusion Builder. It worked great and my app was completely working. However, when I was adding some enhancements, I ran into an error when I restarted the CF app server. Here's the message I keep getting:
"Id field not defined for cfc Path.to.my.ORMCfCPage. Either the table should have a PK column mapped to a cfc field OR at least one field should be specified as id."
My App.cfc file only had orm enabled (no other mappings) when it was working. I've since tried specifying things like the cfc location etc. and it still hasn't helped.
// MORE DETAILS:
- When my app was working, I had moved it to 2 other servers. I had this error on both of those but not on my local copy. They all use the exact same database.
- The last change I made before the error was adding a generator="identity" field to my generated ORM beans. Once I got the message, I tried changing it back and restarting again but still got the error.
- I've also made sure all of the Adobe tags are in my web root (as suggested in a prior posting about this problem). I've search all over for a solution and nobody has a solution posted online that works so far.
Do you have any idea why this is happening?
Thanks!
Jeff

Quick thought and probably not relevant, but do you have this.ormsettings.savemapping set to true in your Application.cfc? I've fallen foul of this before - once CF has generated the hbmxml files and saved them to disk you can make all kinds of changes to your code which won't make a difference as it'll continue to read from the file versions, but only for certain properties and methods at times it seems.
Long shot I know, but I found CF ORM to be a nightmare for seemingly random caching.

Line items are not appearing for some users

Hi
In one module pool program some line items are not appering for specific users. For Ex: Out of 5 line items user1 is able to see only 3 and user2 able to see all the line items. what might be the reason.
Regards
John.

Hi,
What do you mean by line items? Are you talking about screen fields in your module pool program or output of the program?
Please clarify your issue.
Regards,
RS

Fingerprint utility is not working for normal users - Tecra M11

Hi All,
I installed windows 7 pro in Tecra M11 laptop and the Toshiba finger print utility is not working for normal users.
It is working only for domain administrators. The TFPU is not working for, normal domain users, local users, local administrators. If we run the utility it will ask to enter the windows password and once we applied the password then the message saying "entered password is not valid" will prompt even if we are trying to use the utility first time.
If we try with a domain admin account it will work without any problem. Can somebody help me to trouble shoot this issue?
Thanks.

People nowadays experienced that no matter How many times we glide our finger it have no response.In this instance, you might be very afraid of Windows password lost by reason that there is a plenty of important data on your PC.
Then what should you do? One choose is fix the Fingerprint scanners, but this method will cost a lot of money. The other is use the Windows password function to solve the problem. Certainly, this is a very safer, faster and easier to use method for you.
According my personal experience, you can try these three ways to re-access to your PC:
Method 1: Login with the default administrator account
* Step 1: Start Windows PC
* Step 2: When you can see the Windows login screen, press ctrl+alt+del keys Twice and it'll show Classic Login box
* Step 3: Type Administrator as Username and leave the password field blank
* Step 4: Press the Enter Key and then you can be able to login the default windows administrator account which is it created by default when install windows.
*Note:* This trick is only work for Windows XP. And when you input the key combination Please don't put the cursor on any account. And if you change the name or password before, you cannot login by this way.
Method 2: Use the previous password reset disk
This method describes how to create and use a password reset disk for a computer that is a member of a domain. You can use a Windows password reset disk to gain access to your Microsoft Windows Professional-based computer if you forget your Windows password. Please click here to learn more.
Method 3: Using Windows Password Unlocker
Using Windows password remove software is could be the fastest and easiest way for you to reset your Windows password while you didn't create a password reset disk before.
There are 2 options for you: recover Windows password with a bootable CD/DVD or recover Windows password with a USB flash drive.
Before starting, a bootable CD/DVD or USB flash drive and a computer with CD drive are required. (Internal CD drive and external CD drive are both OK.
Option 1: Recover Windows password by burning a bootable CD/DVD
Option 2: Recover Windows password by burning a USB flash drive
The whole Windows password recovery process can be divided to 3 big steps:
* >> Step 1: Burn a USB flash drive to remove lost Windows password
* >> Step 2: Set your target computer to boot from USB
* >> Step 3: Recover forgotten Windows password with the burned USB flash drive
In fact, all you need is a *Windows Password Unlocker www.passwordunlocker.com/windows-password-recovery.html which can help you directly reset your windows xp password, and then you can login your XP without a password required. Of course, there are also some other ways to do it, but this way may be most convenient one.

IE 11 Enhanced Security improperly enabled for one user in domain

I'm running a small network with two domain controllers which use Server 2008 R2 Standard. The clients all run Windows 7 with the latest updates. Today one user suddenly started having their browser always start in Enhanced Security mode on the Windows
7 clients! This happens for any client in the domain, but it does not happen when then user logs into the terminal server for the domain. I use roaming profiles and redirected folders. I have separate profiles for the Terminal server from those used for the
local computers. I have restored the user's profile to last week when the problem was not happening, but it did not help. It does not happen for any other user in the network, even if the user logs in on the same computer. So there is something in the user's
environment that is causing the problem. I have reset IE 11 to default and it still comes up in with Enhanced Security for that user on the Windows 7 clients. I've searched the internet for this problem without success.

So I figured this out. I think that it is a mis-feature in Server 2008. The particular user is a member of the Backup Operators security group on the domain. Recently they did a backup on the server and then this problem started.
It appears that even though they are not a server administrator or a domain administrator, the Enhance Security settings got put into their roaming profile and when they logged into their workstation, the settings got applied to IE on their workstation.
If I turned of Enhance Security on the server for only users, the problem still happened for this user, even though they are only a Backup Operator, not an administrator. If I turned off Enhanced security on the server for administrators, logged in and out
of the server as this user, then the problem went away.
So it seems that Backup Operators are viewed as "administrators" by Enhanced Security and if you use roaming profiles for such users, Enhanced Security will be enabled for such users on their workstations. Yuck.
Easiest solution is probably to have a separate user account for the backup role on the server.

Bank Charges field not enabled in Receipts Form though the profile is set

Bank Charges field not enabled in Receipts Form though the profile "AR: Create Bank Charges" is set to 'Yes' at Application and Responsibility level. I have also given GL codes for Bank Charges in Payment Method Im using.
What could be the reason for the above?

For Bank Charges to work, we have to use payment method attached to Receipt Class with "No Remittance" Remittance Method and "Directly" Clearance Method. I created a new payment method, using that in receipts form enabled the bank charges.

C4C & Lotus Notes integration for service users

Hi,
I tried to find information about C4C and Lotus Notes integration for service users without success. User manual says on Sales both Outlook and Notes, but in Service only Outlook. Does Lotus Notes add-in work for service users similar than sales users? Is there anywhere demo video for that? I can only found demo video for sales (SAP Sales OnDemand Outlook Integration Demo (new) - YouTube).
-Aatos

Hi Aatos,
The Lotus notes integration currently supports the "Field Service" role in Cloud for Service where you are primarily servicing customers in the the field and have direct email communications with your customers. In this use-case, similar to "Field Sales" (AKA SFA Users) in Cloud for Sales, you can receive an email from a customer, get information about that customer from Cloud for Customer via the Lotus Integration, and be able to upload that email into Cloud for Customer as an email activity to track the email correspondence between the user and the customer.
However, the Lotus notes integration does not support the "Call Center" role in Cloud for Service where you are a contact center agent in a centralized service center processing emails that are routed into a common inbox and all correspondence is sent out in behalf of a central inbox such as [email protected] In this usecase all emails automatically create tickets and all emails both inbound and outbound are automatically recorded as email activities without customer or user intervention. The email client for this usecase is either a C4C email client or Windows Outlook Client as you found in the documentation.
Thanks,
Rei

Thunderbird Mission Control Desktop/AutoConfig not working for some users

I have the file: "C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Thunderbird\defaults\pref\custom.js"
It contains:
pref("general.config.obscure_value", 0);
pref("general.config.filename", "TMcustom.cfg");
I have the file: "C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Thunderbird\TMcustom.cfg"
It contains:
var promptService = Components.classes["@mozilla.org/embedcomp/prompt-service;1"]
.getService(Components.interfaces.nsIPromptService);
promptService.alert(null, "title", "testing");
For most of my users the alert pops up fine when I start Thunderbird, but for a few it doesn't. All of the machines where setup with the same install script. If I log into one of the machines where it's not working as a different user, then it works fine, so I know the files are in the right spot. So why would it not work for specific users? Is there something in the user's Windows profile that could cause it to not work? Or are there any other suggestions?

As it turns out this was a known bug that was corrected in the recent release of Java 7_65 and Java 8_11. Here is a link to the bug description in the database.
Bug ID: JDK-8019274 RMI thread can no longer call out to AWT thread for webstart app

After Upgradation BPF is not working for some users

Hi All,
We have recently upgraded from BPC 5.1 to 7MS SP7. we are having multi server setup with one application / reporting server (windows 2003 and one sql server 2008 (windows 2003 64 bit).
Intially before upgradation we don't have any issues with BPF and it worked fine for all users. But post upgradation tasks within the BPF does not work for other users except for the first two people who first used it. Other users have the same rights as the ones who can access the tasks.
when they click on the link it gets them to eExcel and the right application but doesnt open the package or report assigned to the task. It doesn't give us any errors, on the status bar we get a message finalising but does not getting any thing.
Any inputs ??

Hi,
Are you sure that those users have installed BPC 7 SP7 clients on their machine? Meaning that you uninstalled 5.1 clients and installed the new client from http://servername/Osoft?
If yes, you should maybe run a client diagnostic on the machines and also check the Management Console for any error messages.
Hope this will drive you to a potential solution.
Best Regards,
Patrick

MAM application is not working for some users

Hi All,
Tha MAM application is not working for some users.Different users have different workcenters other than that I dont see any other change. When I run MAM30_090_GETLIST in the backend I can see the no of customized users.But I cant see same no of users in the MEREP_207 table for the Syncbo MAM30_090 and strcture id TOP in the middleware. There is a data when I checked under worklist monitor for that user. But neither the MAM application nor MAM data is downloading to that device.
If I use different user on the same device I can see the MAM application and MAM data.
What could be the wrong in this case. Any help would be highly appreciated.
Mobile Client:MI 70 SP 15 Patch 0 Build 200802280918
Middleware:SAP NetWeaver 2004s with Patch leve 15
Backend:SAP ECC 6.0
Application:MAM 3.0
Thanks and Regards,
Ameer.

Hi,
from your description the source of your issue is quite obvious: some of the MAM users configured in spro are not configured properly.
For T01 SyncBos the number of TOP records in merep_207 MUST be the same as number of headers returned by an appropriate getList FM in the backend.
You need to solve this before you can go any further.
Reason why a record is not recorded in MEREP_207 - getdetail failed for whatever reason. So execute MAM30_ML_getdetail for each of the users that is not replicated in the middleware and check if there are errors in RETURN table. If there is no error - one of the common reason for replication fail is when there are records in item tables that have duplicate primary keys.
Regards,
Larissa Limarova

Copy To Field not Enabled for finance user in GRPO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for