Cost of Goods Manufactured

Dear Experts,
Kindly guide how to configure cost of goods manufactured and designing of cost sheet.
would appriciate if you could guide step by step methods.
Thank you
Adi

Hi Aadi,
Maintain Overhead Cost Elements
Define Calculation Bases, Percentage Overhead Rates, Quantity-Based Overhead Rates,  Credits, Origin Groups (Optional)
then you can define Costing Sheets
If you have any question feel free to contact me.
Regards,
Srinivas Muthyala

Similar Messages

  • COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED IN COPA - MARGINAL COSTING?

    Dear members,
    I need to confirm the following:
    COPA provides profitability based on Cost of Sales and not Cost of Goods Manufactured (COGM) for the period.
    I need to confirm if this is possible in a COPA report:
    SALE as per Billing
    COGS:
    Material Costs (as per costing key settings in COPA) relevant to sales
    Activity Costs:
    Labor (cost for the period)
    Overheads (cost for the period)
    For activity cost if I take the data available from the value fields, it will be relevant to Cost of Sales and and not COGM.
    Firstly is it possible to call up cost elements and cost centers in COPA report painter (costing based COPA)? If I can, I take this cost as posted in cost element (primary) and cost center (for my overheads and labor costs) then it provides me cost for the period. But will it show me that cost by SKU (Finished Material)?
    If the above is not possible please suggest how can I get Marginal Costing in COPA?
    Regards.
    MAK

    Hello MAK,
    Right, you can use both form of reporting simultaniously. No consequenses, but every time ou need to change the type in KEBC.
    But while getting requirement from client you need to make sure which type suites the most. This will yield better report.
    To achive Marginal costs results you can go for the Costing based report. becase you need to analyse the pattern of change of total cost over period of time.
    Ex:                           Period 01          Period 02           Period 03          P............................
      Total revenue:
       -Total Cost :
    Contrbution Margin:
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    Ajith

  • Cost of goods manufactured vs COGS+ Material ledger

    Hi Experts,
    My company is implenting Material Ledger. They want to see the actual cost of goods manufactured. We are able to develop the actual cost of goods sold in COPA. The required report is to show:
    1- Direct material used at standard + variances (price + usage) to give the actual.
    2- Direct labor (standard + variances = Actual)
    3- Manufacturing overhead ( standard + variances = Actual)
    Attached excel file is showing the requirement.
    Your guidance to develop this report by any means (Report painter, BI, other).
    Regards
    Ahmed Zain Hassan

    Hi Ahmed / Ajay.
    1. In order reports KKO0, you dont see the revaluation of ML, as you said Consumption and Activities are revaluated at  Material level, and as far as i know, theres no way to add  records that represent the revaluation.
    2. The easy way to have a Order Report revaluated at actual cost is with LIS(Logistic InfoSys), creating a Z infostructure (eg copy lis S027) that store consumption and activity QTY, and a user exit  that read the actual cost of consumed materials (depending if this is V, S2, S3) and activities and revaluate. In LIS, there are standard way to "re-post" or repopulate the infostructures. This LIS can be reported with the standard functions (ReportPainter, quers on SQ01), or create a Z tcode that show the info stored in the way you want. Problem: Not all know how to customize LIS, and also you need code in the exit.
    3.  In my country (Peru), there are lots of companies that develop a Z Kardex valuated at actual cost (because, is a legal requirement), and also create Zprograms that calculate the order at actual cost (indeed, i create this reports twice). Its a bit complex, but not impossible and depends on custo EG if you have multiple valuations, you need to write code in order to get the infor for this specific valuations.
    4. About COPA, you can post to copa the Actual Cost Component Split calculated by ML. In this CCS, you can identify the Labor, Direct Materials, and overheads.  You have 2 options, You can post the delta to the original field or have an aditional field that store the difference. This stuff is done in KE27, i see 1 example in the SCN (i guess i bookmarked). Its important to understand you dont have the detail of the delta per consumed material, just an agregated value.
    Here is the link
    http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/KE27+Periodic+Valuation
    5. There is a new ML DrillDown report functionality. Indeed, i couldnt spend time analizing the solution (my test system is with EHP5 and dont plant to upload the OSS), but i guess this is the future. You can look for info with tcode KKML0 in the marketplace, also check this oss 1639462 - ERP accelerators: enhancements in ML drilldown reporting
    My questions:
    What you want?
    + Order Report, i mean Cost detaild per Order? The Actual CCS por order?
    + Material Report? I mean, the monthly average of a Fert, and its CCS ?
    + a PA Report, that show Sales (Incomes), and Costs per matiral , split by Direct, Labor and OverHead?
    Arturo.

  • Cost of goods manufacturing gl assignment in obyc

    hi,
    cost of goods manufacturing gl account with which account modifier combination we need to link
    obyc transaction code - gbb - which account modifier we need to link
    with regards,
    jaya prakash

    Check the following message in the forum
    OBYC- GBB- Transaction keys

  • Table for Cost of Goods Manufactured price

    Hi Gurus
    I want to find out the cost of manufacture price for the item number
    eg
    if we go tcode ck11n , enter the material number and execute twice we get the total cost of the manuafactured which is ppc3
    so could anyone tell me which table can I see the cost of manufacture total price
    regards
    Piroz

    Hi Srimanta
    I check all the tables KEKO ,CKIS AND KEPH
    but did not find the cost of goods manufactureed Total costs in that table could you tell me which field it is ?
    CK11N - Enter the material press execute twice and you will see the costs componet view I need that field
    regards
    Piroz

  • How to use COGM ( cost of goods manufactured )

    Hi my company is a consumer goods ( dairy product ) manufacture. I 'm interested to use SBO.
    I have installed a trial version, and see the process on the SBO using sample database ( OEC Computer ). There is a GL account for COGS ( Cost of Goods Sold ), but why i can't find COGM account? is it possible to count COGM on SBO? Is there any add on that can solve this problem? And do SBO suitable for manufacture?
    Thank You.

    Hi.......
    All those will be taken care by COGS concept.
    For this you need to Plan the Labour and Overhead cost at the time of Production Planing stage if you dont want to include in Bill of Material.
    the description for your quesry would be
    COGM = Direct Raw material Cost + Direct Labor Cost + Factory Overhead + opening Work in Process inventory - ending work in process inventory
    During production Plan COGM will be Child Component Purchase CostOverheads (as service item with standard cost)Cost of WIP
    COGS = COGM + Opening finish goods inventory - Ending finish goods inventory
    During Sale COGS will be COGM+Opening
    Regards,
    Rahul

  • How to see cost of Goods manufactured

    How to see cost of Goods manufactured

    Hi,
    If u have used production/process order , u can see the  cost of lot produced at Porduction order itself.
    Order header View  - Goto- cost- analysis (C003/COR3).
    Pradeep

  • Cost of Goods Sold Value

    Hello,
    In our material master, neither Moving Average price nor Standard price is maintained,But while doing PGI it is taking value of Cost goods Manufactured from costing Sheet.
    Pls help me to know,how this value gets determined during PGI and procedure to capture this cost of Goods manuf. in condition type in a sales order.
    Regards
    Amit
    Edited by: Amit Gupta on Mar 23, 2009 5:40 AM

    Hello Lakshmipathi ,
    Yes, Our is Make to Order Scenario.Pls help us to determine this cost in Sales order after costing Run.
    In EK02 we can capture Cost of Goods Sold,But i want to capture Cost of Goods Manufactured.
    Thanks for your prompt response.
    Regards
    Amit

  • Cost of goods sold for trading goods

    In my company Cost based copa is configured.
    We do manufacture and sale the goods, also we do trading to goods. for manufacturing goods the standard cost estimation is released but for trading we are not doing std cost estimation. In SD pricing procedure VPRS condition is incorporated to get cost of good manufactured. Now i want  the cost of goods sold for Trading material to flow to co-pa.
    How do i do it?
    Do i need to create and release the std cost estimate for trading material? or there is any way i can manage the cogs to flow to co-pa actual cost.
    Regards
    Sanjay Petkar

    One way is certainly to create standard cost estimates for the purchased products. Depending on your costing view qty structure and MRP view procurement settings you can use either CK40N or costing without qty stucture.
    If you want moving average, then you need to exclude the purrchased material type from looking for a cost estimate in COPA, and then you need to link VPRS to your cost of sales key figure in PA.

  • Wt entry for cost of good sold

    Hi guru's
    wt is entry for cost of good sold,

    The cost of goods sold consists of the cost of goods manufactured together with sales and administration overhead costs.

  • Posting of Commission Exp to calculate the Cost of Goods Sold

    Hi Team,
    I do work in an automobile manufacturing organization and is new to SAP FI module. I have a business requirement which I need to fulfill; I would appreciate if all you gurus help me with finding the solution.
    Business Scenario:  at present, we are posting the following entries to record the commission we paid to dealers for selling vehicles.
    Commission Exp (DR)
         Customer (CR)
    Customer (DR)
         Dealer (CR)
    With these entries we are not been able to track the commission based on vehicle variants i.e. Toyota GLI, XLI etc.
    New Requirement:
    To calculate the Cost of Goods Sold for a variant, I need to track the commission expense based on vehicleu2019s variants. Please help me in finding the solution.
    Thanks

    Thanks for quick response.
    Let me give little more details of type of commission entries we have
    1) Normal Commission - Fixed commission variant wise and is derived from SD.
    2) Additional Commission - No predefined formula, this is totally based on top management discretion. Management decides how much would be paid to a particular dealer.
    3) Sliding Commission deduction - Deduction of certain amount from commission on late payments.
    4) Additional Sliding Commission - Payment of additional commission based on early payment terms.
    Currently, FI department is calculating all these figures on Excel sheets and then post a JV for each type of above mentioned commission.
    How can I configure the system to calculate these amounts automatically without involving Excel Sheet help?
    and how to post these amounts variant wise along with dealers and customers.

  • Cost of Goods Sold by Cost Elements Accounting

    EBS Version: 12.1.3
    Is it possible to define the COGS (OM: Generate Cost of Goods Sold) to capture Cost of Goods Sold by Cost Elements ?
    The way the cost is built through the WIP process is through Cost Elements:
    * direct material,
    * direct labor,
    * manufacturing overhead
    * material overhead
    * etc...
    All these elements are captured separately in WIP and in separate accounts.
    Is it possible to keep in separate COGS accounts (COGS -Direct Material, COGS Direct Labor, etc.) and not just be lumped into one Total COGS account at the time of sales order issue.
    Is It possible with SLA Customization (derivation rules, etc.)? or modifying workflow?? I need detailed solution please!!!
    I need the information in SLA, i don't care if not possible in material distributions.
    Thanks...

    I need help experts!!!

  • LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse

    Subject: LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse and not accounting for the year 2008)
    Problem:
    we must add the cost of goods of the raw material (for which was made a check invoice) of the costs, which are arising and charged by different suppliers (transport, freight, insurance, etc. ..). These are already included in FI with fb60.
    The result should be:
    - From the consignment of goods entering, add (only in Warehouse (STOCK), NOT IN ACCOUNTING ') cost accessory
    - Do not change the quantity
    - Having the total cost of stock
    - Exploiting the average cost to FIFO must consider the total cost after additional adjustment
    Example:                                                                                data
    ME21N: purchaise order No. 321 = article 1000kg a price of u20AC / kg 2.30               01/07/2008
    MIGO: goods receipt PO confirms price quantity x (u20AC 23,000) batch 298                      07/07/2008
    MIRO(enter incoming invoice): Check invoice OK per (u20AC 23,000) batch 298           07/08/2008
    Invoices received for costs Accessories:                                                                08/08/2008
    FB60: transportation bill on all'purchaise order above cost u20AC / 0.11 kg
    0.11 * 1000kg = 110 recorded in cost and accounting of stock.
    In accounting, the cost has been reported, in warehouse I need to reverse (add) u20AC / kg to 0.11 initial cost of u20AC / 2.30 kg without adjustments in general accounting, but only in warehouse value and not in the quantity.
    So in the end I should have:
    batch n° 298 -  kg  1000 at a cost of u20AC 2.41 (2.30 +0.11) for the year 2008. How should I do?
    thanks

    Thomas,
    I presume that your client has activated 'Revenue Recognition' component in SAP.
    If your client has already activated the RR component, they may be aware that the activation is unreversible.
    Recognition of costs in a deferred revenue scenario requires some customization effort but definitely do-able. It is not falling within standard SAP.
    I worked on scope of one such project but it did not happen unfortunately.
    Can you please post your regular updates in this forum?
    All the best.
    Thanks
    PS: I am not an employee of SAP AG and by answering questions, I am not getting any monetary benefits anywhere. I am answering questions here in my spare time for recognition and the points awarded, which gives me a sense of self-satisfaction. Awarding points is also a way of saying thanks and it will encourage me to answer more questions and share my knowledge and experience

  • LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in Stock and

    Problem:
    we must add the cost of goods of the raw material (for which was made a check invoice) of the costs, which are arising and charged by different suppliers (transport, freight, insurance, etc. ..). These are already included in FI with fb60.
    The result should be:
    - From the consignment of goods entering, add (only in Warehouse (STOCK), NOT IN ACCOUNTING ') cost accessory
    - Do not change the quantity
    - Having the total cost of stock
    - Exploiting the average cost to FIFO must consider the total cost after additional adjustment
    Example:                                                                                data
    ME21N: purchaise order No. 321 = article 1000kg a price of u20AC / kg 2.30          01/07/2008
    MIGO: goods receipt PO confirms price quantity x (u20AC 23,000) batch 298          07/07/2008
    MIRO(enter incoming invoice): Check invoice OK per (u20AC 23,000) batch 298       07/08/2008
    Invoices received for costs Accessories:                                                                08/08/2008
    FB60: transportation bill on all'purchaise order above cost u20AC / 0.11 kg
    0.11 * 1000kg = 110 recorded in cost and accounting of stock.
    In accounting, the cost has been reported, in warehouse I need to reverse (add) u20AC / kg to 0.11 initial cost of u20AC / 2.30 kg without adjustments in general accounting, but only in warehouse value and not in the quantity.
    So in the end I should have:
    batch n° 298 -  kg  1000 at a cost of u20AC 2.41 (2.30 +0.11) for the year 2008. How should I do?
    thanks

    Hi Rahul,
    In My GRPO in all there are e items in 2, 3 and 4 qty respectively.
    During GRPO:
    Finished Product=149610
    During Landed Cost:
    Finished Product= 35764.22
    So (149610+35764.22)/GRPO Qty (9) = Per Unit Cost during GRPO (20597.135)
    Now when you sale against above GRPO then
    you COGS Will be
    In my invoice i sold all the above items in qty 1 each so
    COGS= Per Unit Cost during GRPO ( 20597.135) * Sales Qty(3)  Dr,
    Finished Product= 32634.71 (CR) does not come to this
    So this Finished Product 32634.71 (CR) is nothing but Per Unit Cost during GRPO*Sales Qty
    Am i doing something wrong ?
    Thanks
    Malhaar

  • Cost of Goods sold in cross company sales

    Hi ,
    We have a situation where we need to transfer goods from one company code and site ( Company A ) to another company code and site ( Company B )at the cost price of company A. We are creating a purchase order for this goods from Company B to Comapny A and in turn a sales order is issued for this from Company A.We pick up purchase price in PO from as the Per unit cost of comapny A.
    The issue arises here about in the delivery from company A where the cost of goods sold in delivery is done based on the total stock value divided by the quantity sold as this is SAP method of calculation and this does not always match with the per unit cost. Currently we are passing this difference as discounts.
    This is the best we could achieve where by we have been able to satisfy the business need of having no difference on the purchanse price of company B and sales price of company A.
    My question is : Whether is there any more effecient method of achieving the desired result without having the difference which we are currently passing on as discounts ???
    Would really appreciate any help.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Kartik Shah

    Hi Raj/ Mahendro,
    Thank you for sending me the reply. I will briefly explain you the our process. The purchase from external vendor is done in warehouse belonging to one company code. The purchase is done at Moving average price but normally for an  article there are no price variations. Goods receipt in warehouse is done after adding freight and insurance onto the cost of article.This is the value at which we want to transfer to another site in anotehr company code.
    Now the replneshiment requirement from the other site which belongs to different company code raises a PO on to the warehouse. This PO picks up the article price (KOMV-KBETR) as the MAP from the warehouse (MBEW-VERPR). However the field MBEW-SALK3 for the warehouse is not exactly the quantity multiplied by MAP.It is actually the VERPR field which has the value based on the field SALK3 divided by the stock quantity and rounded off to the two decimal places. There is slight variation here itself due to the rounding of the total stock value and then again rounding at the per unit price.( Both the above fields of MBEW)
    What we are doing on the sales order is to pass the MBEW-VERPR as EDI1 and the sotck value for the quantity ordered  ( ZDEI a new condition) by the site as MBEW-SALK3  divided by the total stock at that point and multiply by the quantity ordered. So due to rounding differences there is difference in the value of EDI1 and ZEDI . Again during the billing from warehouse this condition ZEDI picks up the stock value based on the quantity delivered.
    Since there are minor differences due to the rounding of values between per unit price and the actual stock value this are being passed off as discount and the payables by the ordering site and receivables from the warehouse are the same. Cost of goods sold from warehouse is the actual stock value being sold which is the revenue for the warehouse. 
    Even if we use the standard SAP stock transport order with billing how could we ensure that we do not have even this minor differences.
    Doing away with another document is not the requirement  since we already have automated the process of sales order creation from the pruchase orders.
    Do you think we can achieve our requirement using SAP standard process? Except for this rounding differences we are fine with the current process as well.
    Do Look forward to your answer.
    Warm Regards,
    Kartik Shah

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to create a report with data using the Crystal Reports for Java SDK

    Hi, How do I create a report with data that can be displayed via the Crystal Report for Java SDK and the Viewers API? I am writing my own report designer, and would like to use the Crystal Runtime Engine to display my report in DHTML, PDF, and Excel

  • My husbands itunes account is set up on my iphone - how can I change this?

    My husbands itunes account is set up on my iphone.  This wasnt an issue until we upgraded the software on our iphones recently and now his account has been applied to my icloud as well. I think this is the reason that all of my contacts on my phone h

  • GRE over DSL with OSPF in an MPLS network

    Hi guys, we run 2 GRE tunnels in our network. The A end is a PE router while the B end are 2 different CPE DSL sites. Both tunnels at the A end (PE) are using as a source a gig sub inteface which is in the same VRF interface Tunnel40 (for branch offi

  • Import Excel file to update project

    I'm trying to update my current project activities with codes in User Defined Fields created in another version of the project. Everything seems to be okay up to the point when I'm selecting the project to import the excel file to. I try and select a

  • Dictionary: the links are gone?

    I remember if I pointed to any word in the explanation, the word will appear underlined as a link. When click on it, it will take me to that word. But somehow this function is gone: there is no link and underline any more. What's wrong?