Cost of goods manufactured vs COGS+ Material ledger

Hi Experts,
My company is implenting Material Ledger. They want to see the actual cost of goods manufactured. We are able to develop the actual cost of goods sold in COPA. The required report is to show:
1- Direct material used at standard + variances (price + usage) to give the actual.
2- Direct labor (standard + variances = Actual)
3- Manufacturing overhead ( standard + variances = Actual)
Attached excel file is showing the requirement.
Your guidance to develop this report by any means (Report painter, BI, other).
Regards
Ahmed Zain Hassan

Hi Ahmed / Ajay.
1. In order reports KKO0, you dont see the revaluation of ML, as you said Consumption and Activities are revaluated at  Material level, and as far as i know, theres no way to add  records that represent the revaluation.
2. The easy way to have a Order Report revaluated at actual cost is with LIS(Logistic InfoSys), creating a Z infostructure (eg copy lis S027) that store consumption and activity QTY, and a user exit  that read the actual cost of consumed materials (depending if this is V, S2, S3) and activities and revaluate. In LIS, there are standard way to "re-post" or repopulate the infostructures. This LIS can be reported with the standard functions (ReportPainter, quers on SQ01), or create a Z tcode that show the info stored in the way you want. Problem: Not all know how to customize LIS, and also you need code in the exit.
3.  In my country (Peru), there are lots of companies that develop a Z Kardex valuated at actual cost (because, is a legal requirement), and also create Zprograms that calculate the order at actual cost (indeed, i create this reports twice). Its a bit complex, but not impossible and depends on custo EG if you have multiple valuations, you need to write code in order to get the infor for this specific valuations.
4. About COPA, you can post to copa the Actual Cost Component Split calculated by ML. In this CCS, you can identify the Labor, Direct Materials, and overheads.  You have 2 options, You can post the delta to the original field or have an aditional field that store the difference. This stuff is done in KE27, i see 1 example in the SCN (i guess i bookmarked). Its important to understand you dont have the detail of the delta per consumed material, just an agregated value.
Here is the link
http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/KE27+Periodic+Valuation
5. There is a new ML DrillDown report functionality. Indeed, i couldnt spend time analizing the solution (my test system is with EHP5 and dont plant to upload the OSS), but i guess this is the future. You can look for info with tcode KKML0 in the marketplace, also check this oss 1639462 - ERP accelerators: enhancements in ML drilldown reporting
My questions:
What you want?
+ Order Report, i mean Cost detaild per Order? The Actual CCS por order?
+ Material Report? I mean, the monthly average of a Fert, and its CCS ?
+ a PA Report, that show Sales (Incomes), and Costs per matiral , split by Direct, Labor and OverHead?
Arturo.

Similar Messages

  • COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED IN COPA - MARGINAL COSTING?

    Dear members,
    I need to confirm the following:
    COPA provides profitability based on Cost of Sales and not Cost of Goods Manufactured (COGM) for the period.
    I need to confirm if this is possible in a COPA report:
    SALE as per Billing
    COGS:
    Material Costs (as per costing key settings in COPA) relevant to sales
    Activity Costs:
    Labor (cost for the period)
    Overheads (cost for the period)
    For activity cost if I take the data available from the value fields, it will be relevant to Cost of Sales and and not COGM.
    Firstly is it possible to call up cost elements and cost centers in COPA report painter (costing based COPA)? If I can, I take this cost as posted in cost element (primary) and cost center (for my overheads and labor costs) then it provides me cost for the period. But will it show me that cost by SKU (Finished Material)?
    If the above is not possible please suggest how can I get Marginal Costing in COPA?
    Regards.
    MAK

    Hello MAK,
    Right, you can use both form of reporting simultaniously. No consequenses, but every time ou need to change the type in KEBC.
    But while getting requirement from client you need to make sure which type suites the most. This will yield better report.
    To achive Marginal costs results you can go for the Costing based report. becase you need to analyse the pattern of change of total cost over period of time.
    Ex:                           Period 01          Period 02           Period 03          P............................
      Total revenue:
       -Total Cost :
    Contrbution Margin:
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    Ajith

  • Cost of goods manufacturing gl assignment in obyc

    hi,
    cost of goods manufacturing gl account with which account modifier combination we need to link
    obyc transaction code - gbb - which account modifier we need to link
    with regards,
    jaya prakash

    Check the following message in the forum
    OBYC- GBB- Transaction keys

  • Cost of Goods Manufactured

    Dear Experts,
    Kindly guide how to configure cost of goods manufactured and designing of cost sheet.
    would appriciate if you could guide step by step methods.
    Thank you
    Adi

    Hi Aadi,
    Maintain Overhead Cost Elements
    Define Calculation Bases, Percentage Overhead Rates, Quantity-Based Overhead Rates,  Credits, Origin Groups (Optional)
    then you can define Costing Sheets
    If you have any question feel free to contact me.
    Regards,
    Srinivas Muthyala

  • How to use COGM ( cost of goods manufactured )

    Hi my company is a consumer goods ( dairy product ) manufacture. I 'm interested to use SBO.
    I have installed a trial version, and see the process on the SBO using sample database ( OEC Computer ). There is a GL account for COGS ( Cost of Goods Sold ), but why i can't find COGM account? is it possible to count COGM on SBO? Is there any add on that can solve this problem? And do SBO suitable for manufacture?
    Thank You.

    Hi.......
    All those will be taken care by COGS concept.
    For this you need to Plan the Labour and Overhead cost at the time of Production Planing stage if you dont want to include in Bill of Material.
    the description for your quesry would be
    COGM = Direct Raw material Cost + Direct Labor Cost + Factory Overhead + opening Work in Process inventory - ending work in process inventory
    During production Plan COGM will be Child Component Purchase CostOverheads (as service item with standard cost)Cost of WIP
    COGS = COGM + Opening finish goods inventory - Ending finish goods inventory
    During Sale COGS will be COGM+Opening
    Regards,
    Rahul

  • Table for Cost of Goods Manufactured price

    Hi Gurus
    I want to find out the cost of manufacture price for the item number
    eg
    if we go tcode ck11n , enter the material number and execute twice we get the total cost of the manuafactured which is ppc3
    so could anyone tell me which table can I see the cost of manufacture total price
    regards
    Piroz

    Hi Srimanta
    I check all the tables KEKO ,CKIS AND KEPH
    but did not find the cost of goods manufactureed Total costs in that table could you tell me which field it is ?
    CK11N - Enter the material press execute twice and you will see the costs componet view I need that field
    regards
    Piroz

  • How to see cost of Goods manufactured

    How to see cost of Goods manufactured

    Hi,
    If u have used production/process order , u can see the  cost of lot produced at Porduction order itself.
    Order header View  - Goto- cost- analysis (C003/COR3).
    Pradeep

  • Material Ledger Active - K088 Settlement doesnt use Actual Cost Comp Split

    Production Order quantities are all scrap (in confirmation) thus order balance contains Consumed Materials and Activity Allocation
    When KO88 Settlement is run, the system uses Standard Cost Component Split to allocate the residual to Cost Components instead of the Actual Cost Component Split
    When we run the flow trace, the message says:
    "Splitting according to output material S-Price CCS"
    Expectation was that costs would flow according to Actual Cost Component split.
    There is note 756167 - This note activates the update of the actual cost component split information in the material ledger document when you perform the order settlements.
    However current release is 604, so its expected that this is already applied.
    Any help or insight on how to settle using Actual Cost Component split is appreciated.
    Edited by: Chris Gibson on May 5, 2010 8:57 PM
    Edited by: Chris Gibson on May 5, 2010 8:59 PM

    The second option you mentioned of using separate value field for transferring the standard cost component split from the actual cost component split is the way SAP designed this integration between CO-PA and the Material Ledger.  But 40 value field for cost component split is excessive.  CO-PA allows up to 120 value fields maximum, so I agree it does not seem prudent to use 80 of them for this purpose.
    I suggest you reexamine the level of detail you think may be needed in CO-PA and try to use CO-PC reports at the cost element level to report on more detail.  Keep the CO-PA view more aggregated and you can stick with the standard solution for comparing standard to actual costs in CO-PA.
    Best regards,
    Jeffrey Holdeman

  • Cost of goods sold for trading goods

    In my company Cost based copa is configured.
    We do manufacture and sale the goods, also we do trading to goods. for manufacturing goods the standard cost estimation is released but for trading we are not doing std cost estimation. In SD pricing procedure VPRS condition is incorporated to get cost of good manufactured. Now i want  the cost of goods sold for Trading material to flow to co-pa.
    How do i do it?
    Do i need to create and release the std cost estimate for trading material? or there is any way i can manage the cogs to flow to co-pa actual cost.
    Regards
    Sanjay Petkar

    One way is certainly to create standard cost estimates for the purchased products. Depending on your costing view qty structure and MRP view procurement settings you can use either CK40N or costing without qty stucture.
    If you want moving average, then you need to exclude the purrchased material type from looking for a cost estimate in COPA, and then you need to link VPRS to your cost of sales key figure in PA.

  • LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in Stock and

    Problem:
    we must add the cost of goods of the raw material (for which was made a check invoice) of the costs, which are arising and charged by different suppliers (transport, freight, insurance, etc. ..). These are already included in FI with fb60.
    The result should be:
    - From the consignment of goods entering, add (only in Warehouse (STOCK), NOT IN ACCOUNTING ') cost accessory
    - Do not change the quantity
    - Having the total cost of stock
    - Exploiting the average cost to FIFO must consider the total cost after additional adjustment
    Example:                                                                                data
    ME21N: purchaise order No. 321 = article 1000kg a price of u20AC / kg 2.30          01/07/2008
    MIGO: goods receipt PO confirms price quantity x (u20AC 23,000) batch 298          07/07/2008
    MIRO(enter incoming invoice): Check invoice OK per (u20AC 23,000) batch 298       07/08/2008
    Invoices received for costs Accessories:                                                                08/08/2008
    FB60: transportation bill on all'purchaise order above cost u20AC / 0.11 kg
    0.11 * 1000kg = 110 recorded in cost and accounting of stock.
    In accounting, the cost has been reported, in warehouse I need to reverse (add) u20AC / kg to 0.11 initial cost of u20AC / 2.30 kg without adjustments in general accounting, but only in warehouse value and not in the quantity.
    So in the end I should have:
    batch n° 298 -  kg  1000 at a cost of u20AC 2.41 (2.30 +0.11) for the year 2008. How should I do?
    thanks

    Hi Rahul,
    In My GRPO in all there are e items in 2, 3 and 4 qty respectively.
    During GRPO:
    Finished Product=149610
    During Landed Cost:
    Finished Product= 35764.22
    So (149610+35764.22)/GRPO Qty (9) = Per Unit Cost during GRPO (20597.135)
    Now when you sale against above GRPO then
    you COGS Will be
    In my invoice i sold all the above items in qty 1 each so
    COGS= Per Unit Cost during GRPO ( 20597.135) * Sales Qty(3)  Dr,
    Finished Product= 32634.71 (CR) does not come to this
    So this Finished Product 32634.71 (CR) is nothing but Per Unit Cost during GRPO*Sales Qty
    Am i doing something wrong ?
    Thanks
    Malhaar

  • Cost of Goods Sold Value

    Hello,
    In our material master, neither Moving Average price nor Standard price is maintained,But while doing PGI it is taking value of Cost goods Manufactured from costing Sheet.
    Pls help me to know,how this value gets determined during PGI and procedure to capture this cost of Goods manuf. in condition type in a sales order.
    Regards
    Amit
    Edited by: Amit Gupta on Mar 23, 2009 5:40 AM

    Hello Lakshmipathi ,
    Yes, Our is Make to Order Scenario.Pls help us to determine this cost in Sales order after costing Run.
    In EK02 we can capture Cost of Goods Sold,But i want to capture Cost of Goods Manufactured.
    Thanks for your prompt response.
    Regards
    Amit

  • Material ledger is not active in valuation area C002

    Dear All,
    I have a Scheduling Agreement for a material 'A' with Vendor 'V' with diff prices with validity dates, I did the GR & when i am posting the invoice thro' miro, system is throwing error as above Material ledger is not active in valuation area C002 Why should I activate the material ledger here ? Pls suggest how can i solve this ?
    regds,
    Kallu

    Hi
    For a Particular material, Material Ledger is active or not? Can be checked in Accountig view of Material Master.
    Why we need Material Ledger?
    A fundamental task of the material ledger is carrying inventories in multiple currencies and/or
    valuations.
    Material inventory values are normally carried by the SAP system in one currency. The material
    ledger component enables the R/3 System to carry inventory values in two additional
    currencies/valuations. Therefore, all goods movements in the material ledger are performed in up
    to 3 currencies or valuations. Currency amounts are translated into foreign currencies at
    historical exchange rates directly at the time of posting. Businesses such as those in highinflation
    countries can therefore carry their inventories in a more stable currency (such as US
    dollars). This reveals inflationary effects on inventory values.
    If you use transfer prices to represent value flows in your company in different
    valuation views, you must use the material ledger. This allows you to carry your
    inventories in three different valuations (legal valuation, valuation for reporting
    purposes, and profit center valuation).
    Before activating the material ledger, make sure you know which currencies and valuations
    you want to use, because you cannot go back and change the setting.
    Activating the material ledger is a prerequisite for using multiple valuations.
    Thanks
    Raman

  • LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse

    Subject: LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse and not accounting for the year 2008)
    Problem:
    we must add the cost of goods of the raw material (for which was made a check invoice) of the costs, which are arising and charged by different suppliers (transport, freight, insurance, etc. ..). These are already included in FI with fb60.
    The result should be:
    - From the consignment of goods entering, add (only in Warehouse (STOCK), NOT IN ACCOUNTING ') cost accessory
    - Do not change the quantity
    - Having the total cost of stock
    - Exploiting the average cost to FIFO must consider the total cost after additional adjustment
    Example:                                                                                data
    ME21N: purchaise order No. 321 = article 1000kg a price of u20AC / kg 2.30               01/07/2008
    MIGO: goods receipt PO confirms price quantity x (u20AC 23,000) batch 298                      07/07/2008
    MIRO(enter incoming invoice): Check invoice OK per (u20AC 23,000) batch 298           07/08/2008
    Invoices received for costs Accessories:                                                                08/08/2008
    FB60: transportation bill on all'purchaise order above cost u20AC / 0.11 kg
    0.11 * 1000kg = 110 recorded in cost and accounting of stock.
    In accounting, the cost has been reported, in warehouse I need to reverse (add) u20AC / kg to 0.11 initial cost of u20AC / 2.30 kg without adjustments in general accounting, but only in warehouse value and not in the quantity.
    So in the end I should have:
    batch n° 298 -  kg  1000 at a cost of u20AC 2.41 (2.30 +0.11) for the year 2008. How should I do?
    thanks

    Thomas,
    I presume that your client has activated 'Revenue Recognition' component in SAP.
    If your client has already activated the RR component, they may be aware that the activation is unreversible.
    Recognition of costs in a deferred revenue scenario requires some customization effort but definitely do-able. It is not falling within standard SAP.
    I worked on scope of one such project but it did not happen unfortunately.
    Can you please post your regular updates in this forum?
    All the best.
    Thanks
    PS: I am not an employee of SAP AG and by answering questions, I am not getting any monetary benefits anywhere. I am answering questions here in my spare time for recognition and the points awarded, which gives me a sense of self-satisfaction. Awarding points is also a way of saying thanks and it will encourage me to answer more questions and share my knowledge and experience

  • Material ledger using several plants

    Hi all,
    I have  the plan B that receives 2 FG items from Plant A they make and adjustment delivering some additional cost, both are valuation areas with  material ledger, when the stock transfer take place, its moved with standard price $ 100 and with the costing run the real cost from this periods is $120 the stock and the GI from sales are properly  revalued with the actual price ($120), not the transfer stock, the difference between the stock transfer price and the actual price ($20)  remains on ckm3n as non allocated cost, how this work I need to transfer this $20 price difference to cost of plant B ? 
    THANKS A LOT!

    Hi Sarada
    thanks for your time, this is the scenario details
    Plant A  (production and Sell)
    - initial invent.  $110 dls    per Ton
    - initial invent.      10 Ton.
    - production cost  $130 Dls per Ton
    - production units     10 Ton.
    - Actual Cost  $ 120 Ton  Total Inv. 20 Tons
    - Stock transfer plant to Plant 
    Plant A to Plant B
    10 Ton --> $110 Dls.
    When ckmlcp it's carry out I have $100 cost as non allocated from $ 1o from prices difference with actual cost per ton transferred to Plant B
    Plant B( just sell purpose)
    - initial invent.  $100 dls    per Ton
    - initial invent.      1 Ton.
    - receive stock transfer 10 Ton at $110 dls
    - additional Cost (freight) $ 2 per ton
    on Plant B CKMLP its  "ok" because all cost that was allocated to plant B have been take to inventory valuation how ever its under the real cost because $100 dls from the actual cost from plant A never reach Plant B
    Again Thanks a lot.

  • Wt entry for cost of good sold

    Hi guru's
    wt is entry for cost of good sold,

    The cost of goods sold consists of the cost of goods manufactured together with sales and administration overhead costs.

Maybe you are looking for