Count of id's inside FACT TABLE

hi,
I will like to calculate the count of particular id inside a FACT table.
How to get this done in AWSM or Discoverer For OLAP.
Thanks, Prasad

There is a tech note in the May 05 OLAP Newsletter that explains how to do this:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/olap/oracleorpnewsletter_may05.htm
However, there is a bug/"enhancement opportunity" with the aggregation engine which means the wrong results can be returned. To resolve this you need to run some additional DML after you have created the measure to force the aggregation engine to respect the order of the dimensions set within the Rules tab. The order of the dimensions in this tab is important as it controls when the MAX() vs SUM() aggregation methods are applied.
On the variable that supports the logical formula assign the following property by issuing the following statement:
cns YOUR_VARIABLE_NAME
PROPERTY '$AGGREGATE_FORCEORDER'
and on the logical formula update the definition by also adding a FORCEORDER statement. For example a modified formula would look as follows:
consider EXPENSE_PRT_TOPFRML
eq aggregate(this_aw!EXPENSE_PRT_TOPVAR using this_aw!OBJ311101508 FORCEORDER)
compile EXPENSE_PRT_TOPFRML
upd
commit
Obviously, if you delete the cube and rebuild it from an XML template or redefine it manually you will have to reapply these changes again.
Hope this helps
Keith Laker
Oracle EMEA Consulting
BI Blog: http://oraclebi.blogspot.com/
DM Blog: http://oracledmt.blogspot.com/
BI on Oracle: http://www.oracle.com/bi/
BI on OTN: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/
BI Samples: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/bi/samples/

Similar Messages

Record count is double in the Fact tables when compared to Cube data!

Hello BW Gurus,
I have 2 question to be answered!
1. I have a cube which consist of 3 years of data. Due to some bad data in it, I have dropped the cube data completely from fact and dim tables and did an init. from ODS. the load failed due to "No SID found for value '2000000000000000000000010' of characteristic 0MAT_PLANT". I have run a RSRV test to find if there is any inconsistency in SID's for 0MAT_PLANT but everything looks great. Considering the time span in mind to finish the load I have removed that record from PSA and re-pushed the data from PSA which was successful, however I wanted to know if anyone has come across such kind of error.
2. The load finished successfully in the cube but the performance of the cube was very bad coz my cube request shows only 3.5 million records but when I checked in the fact table it was showing double i.e. 7 million records, which is because I deleted the failed init. request and re-pushed the data from PSA. can anyone suggest me how to overcome this I mean how to bring back my fact table records to 3.5 million?
please advise me and thanks so much!
Swathi.

hi Swathi,
1. for 0mat_plant no sid, beside rsrv, you can try rsd1, infoobject maintenance, there is menu (about 3rd from left) 'fill sid ...'.
for infocube update, please make sure you 'delete data',
'fact and dim...'. check again if fact table counts 0 records then you can update from ods with 'initialize'. or if you go by psa then delete data both infocube and ods (from ods to cube should sufficient).
2. for performance, check in infocube -> manage -> performance, make sure index and statistic is green. you can create index there, also refresh the statistic.
hope this helps.

Record count is more in the Fact tables when compared to Cube data!

When i delete request from my cube it is not getting deleted from the fact table. Cube shows around 3.5 million records but when I checked in the fact table it was showing more than 11 million records.

Hi Kingsley,
   You may try this approach.
   1. Use TCode listschema
   2. Select the type of cube abd give the cube name as well.
   3. This will display the table sinvolved in the cube(star schema).
   4. Select the Ftable listed there and see the number of rows in it.
   Inorder to delete the entire data from cube, you may need to delete all the load requests that has happened before as well.
   Hope this helps...
Thanks,
Raj

Select count from large fact tables with bitmap indexes on them

Hi..
I have several large fact tables with bitmap indexes on them, and when I do a select count from these tables, I get a different result than when I do a select count, column one from the table, group by column one. I don't have any null values in these columns. Is there a patch or a one-off that can rectify this.
Thx

You may have corruption in the index if the queries ...
Select /*+ full(t) */ count(*) from my_table t
... and ...
Select /*+ index_combine(t my_index) */ count(*) from my_table t;
... give different results.
Look at metalink for patches, and in the meantime drop-and-recreate the indexes or make them unusable then rebuild them.

Distinct count of dimension business key in fact table

In my cube I have a fact table which joins to a patient dimension. The patient dimension is a type 2. What I would like to do is get a distinct count of patients who have records in the fact table. The business key in the patient dimension
is the PrimaryMrn. So a SQL query would look like this.
SELECT count(distinct PrimaryMrn)
FROM EncounterFact e
INNER JOIN PatientDim p
on e.PatientKey = p.PatientKey
Is it possible to do this via MDX?
Thanks for the help.

If you have to distinct count an attribute in a SCD 2, you might choose between:
Denormalizing that attribute in the fact table, and the create a classical DISTINCT COUNT measure
Use a many-to-many approach - see the "Distinct Count" scenario in the Many-to-Many White paper here:
http://www.sqlbi.com/articles/many2many (for both Multidimensional and Tabular
If you use Tabular, you might want to read also this pattern:
http://www.daxpatterns.com/distinct-count/
Marco Russo http://www.sqlbi.com http://www.powerpivotworkshop.com http://sqlblog.com/blogs/marco_russo

Distinct count for multiple fact tables in the same cube

I'm fairly new to working with SSAS, but have been working with DW environments for many years.
I have a cube which has 4 fact tables. The central fact table is Encounter and then I also have Visit, Procedure and Medication. Visit, Procedure and Medication all join to Encounter on Encounter Key. The relationship between Encounter
and Procedure and Encounter and Medication are both an optional 1 to 1. The relationship between Encounter and Visit is an optional 1 to many.
Each of the fact tables join to the Patient dimension on the Patient Key. The users are looking for a distinct count of patients in all 4 fact tables.
What is the best way to accomplish this so that my cube does not talk all day to process? Please let me know if you need any more information about my cube in order to answer this.
Thanks for the help,
Andy

Hi Andy,
Each distinct count measure cause an ORDER BY clause in the SELECT sent to the relational data source during processing. In SSAS 2005 or later, it creates a new measure group for each distinct count measure(it's a technique strategy for improving perormance).
Besides, please take a look at the following distinct count optimization techniques:
Create Customized Aggregations
Define a Processing Plan
Create Partitions of Equal Size
Use Partitions Comprised of a Distinct Range of Integers
Distribute the Hash of Your UserIDs
Modulo Function
Hash Function
Choose a Partitioning Strategy
For more detail information, please refer to the article below:
Analysis Services Distinct Count Optimization:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=891
In addition, here is a good article about SSAS Best Practices for your reference:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc966525.aspx
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Hope this helps.
Elvis Long
TechNet Community Support

Calculating count from two fact tables

Hi Guys,
My requirement,
i have two fact table F1, F2 connected with a D1 dimension table, all table connected with a id column
F1 ---------D1------------F2
n 1 1 n
i want to find out the distinct count from Fact F1 where the value also present in F2( ie. F1.id= F2.id condition).
this measure usefull through out my project so i want create a logical column, how to create it.
I tried this way:
i Created two fact table in to one fact table by adding logical source, and created a logical column from existing logical source where F1.id=D1.id and D1.id=F2.Id but it is wrong
Can any suggestion for solve my problem.
Thanks in advance!!!

Hi,
You can create an opaque view in physical layer and wrire a sql like
Select f1.id,count(*) from f1,f2 where f1.id=f2.id group by f1.id.Join this through id with dimesnion and add this fact table in LTS of your fact and use count(*) in report.
Regards,
Sandeep

Counting fact table records within brackets

Hi,
I have a star schema setup in OBIEE, consisting of a fact table of transaction records, linked to a customer dimension and a time dimension via PK-FK relations.
One of the requirements is to count the number of customers based on how many transactions they have done per time period. I imagine solving this by creating logical colums such as "# customers (1-10 transactions)", "# customers (11-20 transactions)", etc. The counting should be based on the current level of drill-down in the time dimension.
Any advice on how to approach this would be greatly appreciated
best regards
M

Thanks for you reply, it brought me a lot closer to a solution. So far i've been able to create a bracket attribute on the customer dimension (via Answers and then into Administrator, as advised). I've verified this against the database, and it categorizes each customer correctly.
The remaining challenge is that I want to see the count within each category on an aggregate bracket level rather than per customer. Using one attribute ("customer bracket") which can take on one of several values (e.g. "0", "1-10", "11-20", etc.) i'm not sure how to accomplish this.
As a workaround i tried creating one column in Answers for each bracket, taking on the value 1 for records falling within that bin, and 0 for all other records. Treating the column as numeric, and adding a sub total (sum), i get the answers i want for each bin. The problem here however, is that one line (value 0 or 1) is shown for each customer record, which makes the report useless for most practical intents and purposes as thousands of records are shown.
Any thoughts on which method i should go ahead with, and how?
regards
M

Fact Table Count Problem

When I do an SE16 on the fact table for 0CCA_C11 i come up with a number close to 175 million. However if I add up all the records added to the cube since it was initialized, the number is around 20 million.
Can anyone explain the discrepancy between these two numbers?

You may not be looking at all the requests in the cube. In the manage screen, change the dates so that you can see even the old requests (requests loaded some years back) and click refresh. When you get all the requests ever loaded into the cube, now try adding the records...
Hope this helps.

How to refresh the list of select one choice which is inside a table?

Hello I am using Jdeveloper Version 11.1.2.1.0.
The table is a normal table that is made to look like a treeTable.
For some rows are or can be parents with Parent_vo_group_id = null and other are children with parent_vo_group_id = vo_group_id of the parent...
If a children changes its parent_vo_group_id to null it can become a parent as well.
I am having a select one choice inside a table column. The list comes from the same table with column Name:
<af:table value="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.collectionModel}" var="row"
                                                  rows="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.rangeSize}"
                                                  contentDelivery="immediate"
                                                  visible="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2Iterator.currentRow != null}"
                                                  fetchSize="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.rangeSize}"
                                                  partialTriggers="::soc1" styleClass="AFStretchWidth"
                                                  rowBandingInterval="0" editingMode="clickToEdit"
                                                  binding="#{adminGroupManagementBean.groupTable}"
                                                  selectionListener="#{adminGroupManagementBean.groupSelectionListener}"
                                                  rowSelection="single" id="t5">
                                            <af:column sortProperty="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.hints.Name.name}"
                                                       sortable="false" styleClass="columnData"
                                                       headerClass="tableHeader"
                                                       headerText="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.hints.Name.label}"
                                                       id="c1">
                                                <af:inputText value="#{row.bindings.Name.inputValue}"
                                                              requiredMessageDetail="Please enter a group name"
                                                              label="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.hints.Name.label}"
                                                              required="true" id="it7" immediate="true" autoSubmit="true"
                                                              columns="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.hints.Name.displayWidth}"
                                                              maximumLength="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.hints.Name.precision}"
                                                              shortDesc="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.hints.Name.tooltip}"
                                                              contentStyle="#{row.ParentVoGroupId eq null? 'font-weight:bold' : 'padding-left:20px'}"
                                                              valueChangeListener="#{adminGroupManagementBean.groupNameChangeListener}"
                                                              partialTriggers="soc2">
                                                    <f:validator binding="#{row.bindings.Name.validator}"/>
                                                </af:inputText>
                                            </af:column>
                                            <af:column sortProperty="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.hints.ParentVoGroupId.name}"
                                                       sortable="false" styleClass="columnData"
                                                       headerClass="tableHeader"
                                                       headerText="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.hints.ParentVoGroupId.label}"
                                                       id="c4">
                                                <af:selectOneChoice value="#{row.bindings.ParentVoGroupId.inputValue}"
                                                                    label="#{row.bindings.ParentVoGroupId.label}"
                                                                    simple="true" immediate="true"
                                                                    required="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.hints.ParentVoGroupId.mandatory}"
                                                                    shortDesc="#{bindings.VoGroupAdminView2.hints.ParentVoGroupId.tooltip}"
                                                                    id="soc2" autoSubmit="true"
                                                                    unselectedLabel="<null>"
                                                                    valueChangeListener="#{adminGroupManagementBean.parentIdValueChangeListener}"
                                                                    visible="#{row.bindings.ChildrenCount.inputValue eq 0 ? true : false}">
                                                    <f:selectItems binding="#{adminGroupManagementBean.selectOneChoiceList}"
                                                                    value="#{row.bindings.ParentVoGroupId.items}"
                                                                   id="si2"/>
                                                </af:selectOneChoice>
                                            </af:column>
                                        </af:table> My select one choice uses the same iterator as the table.
<iterator Binds="VoGroupAdminView2" RangeSize="-1" DataControl="AppModuleDataControl"    id="VoGroupAdminView2Iterator"/>The table uses this view called VoGroupAdminView:
Select t1.vo_Group_id,
       t1.name,
       t1.Vehicle_Owner_Id,
       t1.Graphical_Symbol,
       t1.Lm_Comment,
       t1.Parent_Vo_Group_Id ,
       decode (t2.children_count, null, 0, t2.children_count) as children_count
       from
(SELECT VoGroup.vo_Group_id,
       VoGroup.name,
       VoGroup.Vehicle_Owner_Id,
       VoGroup.Graphical_Symbol,
       VoGroup.Lm_Comment,
       VoGroup.Parent_Vo_Group_Id
FROM VO_GROUP VoGroup
START WITH VoGroup.Parent_Vo_Group_Id IS NULL
CONNECT BY VoGroup.Parent_Vo_Group_Id = PRIOR VoGroup.Vo_Group_Id
order SIBLINGS by VoGroup.name) t1,
(select parent_vo_group_id, count (parent_vo_group_id) as children_count from vo_group
group by parent_vo_group_id) t2
where t1.vo_group_id = t2.parent_vo_group_id (+)the ParentVoGroupId attribute has list of values from this view object called VoGroupAdminLov:
SELECT
    VO_GROUP.NAME,
    VO_GROUP.VEHICLE_OWNER_ID,
    VO_GROUP.PARENT_VO_GROUP_ID,
    VO_GROUP.VO_GROUP_ID
FROM
    VO_GROUP
WHERE VO_GROUP.PARENT_VO_GROUP_ID is null
and VO_GROUP.VO_GROUP_ID <> ?
order by VO_GROUP.NAMEI want to refresh the list of values in the select one choice everytime when i add a new row in the table, delete row in the table or change the value of select one choice component.
What I have tried:
    public void parentIdValueChangeListener(ValueChangeEvent valueChangeEvent) {
        this.setValueToEL("#{row.bindings.ParentVoGroupId.inputValue}", valueChangeEvent.getNewValue());
        BindingContainer bc = BindingContext.getCurrent().getCurrentBindingsEntry();
        DCIteratorBinding voGroupAdminIterator = (DCIteratorBinding)bc.get("VoGroupAdminView2Iterator");
        Key selectedGroupKey = voGroupAdminIterator.getCurrentRow().getKey();
        AppModuleImpl am = (AppModuleImpl)ADFUtils.getApplicationModuleForDataControl("AppModuleDataControl");
        am.getTransaction().postChanges();
        am.getVoGroupAdminView2().executeQuery(); //refresh the table view object;
        am.getVoGroupAdminLov1().executeQuery(); //refresh the list of values view object
        voGroupAdminIterator.invalidateCache(); //remove the cache of the iterator
        voGroupAdminIterator.setCurrentRowWithKey(selectedGroupKey.toStringFormat(true)); // set the selected row again.
        RichSelectOneChoice soc =
            (RichSelectOneChoice)FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getViewRoot().findComponent(":pt1:t5:soc2");
        AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(soc);
        AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(this.groupTable);
    }When i am adding a new row to the table its select one choice list is refreshed but only for the new row. The rest rows have not updated list of values for their select one choice components.
    public String addGroupButtonAction() {
        AppModuleImpl am = (AppModuleImpl)ADFUtils.getApplicationModuleForDataControl("AppModuleDataControl");
        ViewObjectImpl voGroupAdminView = am.getVoGroupAdminView2();
        Row newRow = voGroupAdminView.createRow();
         newRow.setNewRowState(Row.STATUS_INITIALIZED);
        voGroupAdminView.insertRowAtRangeIndex(0, newRow);
        am.getTransaction().postChanges();
        return "null";
    }Edited by: 897833 on Mar 19, 2012 9:07 AM

I made a button to refresh the value of select one choice and it doesn't work yet.
So I just move one of the
    public String refreshParentIdSOCButtonAction() {
        BindingContainer bc = BindingContext.getCurrent().getCurrentBindingsEntry();
        DCIteratorBinding voGroupAdminIterator = (DCIteratorBinding)bc.get("VoGroupAdminView2Iterator");
        Key selectedGroupKey = voGroupAdminIterator.getCurrentRow().getKey();
        AppModuleImpl am = (AppModuleImpl)ADFUtils.getApplicationModuleForDataControl("AppModuleDataControl");
        am.getTransaction().postChanges();
        am.getVoGroupAdminView2().executeQuery();
        am.getVoGroupAdminLov1().executeQuery();
        voGroupAdminIterator.invalidateCache();
        voGroupAdminIterator.setCurrentRowWithKey(selectedGroupKey.toStringFormat(true));
        AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(this.parentIdSelectOneChoice); //refresh the binded SOC as you said
        AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(this.parentIdSelectOneChoiceList); //refresh the binded list even
        AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(this.groupTable); //refresh the table it is in;
        return null;
    }Edited by: 897833 on Mar 23, 2012 2:58 AM

How to create Measures for count on Flag colums in FACT with a CONDITON

I have about 6 flag columns in my fact table and I would like to create measures in my report with count as aggregation on these flag columns with a group by on a condition.
I am able to do this very easily with SQL query but am really stuck with on how to achieve this in OBIEE.
Each of my measure should be to do an aggreagation of count on the flag column with a condition such as is flag true/false.
Eg:
Measure1 - Select count(INV_ID) from payments_f where Flag 1 = "TRUE" and Flag2 = "FALSE" GROUP_BY (COLUMN1)
Measure2 - Select count(INV_ID) from payments_f where Flag 2 = "TRUE" and Flag3 = "FALSE" GROUP_BY (COLUMN1)
similar conditions for all the flag columns.
I tried to write the where condition in the Content tab of the Logical table but unfortunately it does on the table level - which was not very helpful to me
I really appreciate if some one can help me on how to achieve this.
Thanks in Advance

You need to create a new logical column in your existing logical table. Then you need to set the physical mapping to:
CASE WHEN FLAG1 = "TRUE" AND FLAG2 = "FALSE" THEN 1 ELSE 0 END.
Set aggregation rule to Sum.
Regards,
Stijn

DM - "Export from Fact Table" works but "Export" does not work properly

Hi,
I'm using BPC7M.
I found it strange that Export cannot dump data to a flat file though I'm pretty sure my selection of dimension members contain data. The existing of data was further confirmed by running Export from Fact Table successfully, where I chose the same set of dimension members. Below are the log files.
Export log file FAIL
u603Bu6B65u9AA4 2
1. Dump Data:     Failed in 32 sec.
[u9009u62E9]
FILE=\Shenergy\WJ2\DataManager\DataFiles\WJ2_SunnyTest.txt
TRANSFORMATION=\SHENERGY\WJ2\DATAMANAGER\TRANSFORMATIONFILES\SYSTEM FILES\EXPORT.XLS
MEASURENAME=PERIODIC
(u6210u5458u9009u62E9)
Category:
Time:
WED_Entity:
B_Account:
DataSrc: INPUT
[u6D88u606F]
There is no data in the selected region; select a region that has data._2_True
Export from Fact Table log file   SUCCESS
u603Bu6B65u9AA4 2
1. Dump Data:          completed in 1 sec.
2. Convert Data:       completed in 0 sec.
[u9009u62E9]
FILE=\Shenergy\WJ2\DataManager\DataFiles\\WJ2SunnyTest.txt
TRANSFORMATION=\SHENERGY\WJ2\DATAMANAGER\TRANSFORMATIONFILES\SYSTEM FILES\EXPORT.XLS
(u6210u5458u9009u62E9)
Category:
Time:
WED_Entity:
B_Account:
DataSrc: INPUT
[u6D88u606F]
Record Count: 104
Accept Count: 104
Reject Count: 0
Skip Count   :0
I tried Export in another application and it worked properly. Maybe there is something wrong with the application but I don't know how I can fix this.
Thanks!
Sunny

Hi Sorin,
In order to make sure the sum is not equal to 0, I ran the "Clear" package and full optimize the application. Afterwards, I deliberately sent only 1 record. I ran the "Export from Fact Table" and I have the following contents in my output flat file.
B_ACCOUNT,TIME,WED_ENTITY,DATASRC,CATEGORY,SIGNEDDATA
KPI0001,2009.INP,DEP_INPUT,INPUT,ACTUAL,-500.0000000
This confirms that the sum is not 0. Then, I ran "Export" package. Yet again, I encountered the same error.
There is no data in the selected region; select a region that has data._2_True
Best Regards,
Sunny

Fact Tables

Hi!
I needed help on understanding how data is tored in the FACT Tables.
I am currently facing an issue after running SPRUNCONVERSION. The stored procedure generates 4 records in the FACT tables and thereby eliminates any converted values. For eg, If an liability account 1111001 is loaded with a value -5000 at LC; Local Currency, Running SPRUNCONVERSION say wthe the Translation rate of 2, generates 4 records in the FACTWB Tables:
-10000 in USD,
10000 in USD,
-10000 in USD and another +10000 in USD at the same account and at the same crossings.
This in effect shows no converted data in USD and shows a 0 value.
Any guidance to understand how these records are generated and stored will be of great help.
Regards,
Pankti Shroff

Hi
when you save an application Outlooksoft Admin rebuilds the cube or application in Analysis Services and recreates the following SQL items on the applications wb, fac2, and fact table.
1. Dependencies
2. Indexes
3. Contraints
4. Stored procedures
The source field of the applications wb, fac2, and fact tables is used for optimization purposes only. The 'updating source field' step can vary in time depending on the record count and the default value of the source field. This process will take more time when performing a full optimization because we are querying the wb, fac2, and fact tables.
Hope this helps...
Regards
SN...

Fact tables are compatible with the query request

Hi,
i am using 11g.In 10g working fine without any error.After migrate 10g into 11g below error will returning. What is the problem and How we will fix.Could you pls let me know.Thanks
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14020] None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request FACT_AGENT_TIME_STATISTICS.FKEY. (HY000)
SQL Issued: SELECT s_0, s_1, s_2, s_3, s_4, s_5, s_6, s_7, s_8, s_9, s_10 FROM ( SELECT 0 s_0, "Team Performance"."DIMENSION - LOCATION"."COUNTRY CODE" s_1, "Team Performance"."DIMENSION - TIME"."BUSINESS DATE" s_2, CASE WHEN "Team Performance"."DIMENSION - TEAM"."ROLE" ='TEAM LEADER' THEN 'Team Leader' ELSE "Team Performance"."DIMENSION - TEAM"."TEAM" END s_3, CASE WHEN '30 Mins Interval' ='15 Mins Interval' THEN "Team Performance"."DIMENSION - TIME"."15 Mins Interval" ELSE "Team Performance"."DIMENSION - TIME"."30 Mins Interval" END s_4, ((SUM("Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT CALL STATISTICS"."TIME - ACD CALL HANDLING"+"Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT CALL STATISTICS"."TIME - AFTER CALL WORK (ACW)")+SUM("Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."AVAILABLE TIME"))/60)/(COUNT(DISTINCT "Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."DATE ID")*"Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."INTERVAL TYPE") s_5, (SUM("Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."AUX3 - TRAINING"+"Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."AUX4 - MEETING"+"Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."AUX5 - PROJECT"+"Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."AUX6 - COACHING")/60)/(COUNT(DISTINCT "Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."DATE ID")*"Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."INTERVAL TYPE") s_6, (SUM("Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."STAFFED TIME")/60)/(COUNT(DISTINCT "Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."DATE ID")*"Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."INTERVAL TYPE") s_7, COUNT(DISTINCT "Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."DATE ID")*"Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."INTERVAL TYPE" s_8, MIN("Team Performance"."DIMENSION - TIME"."FULL DATE TIME") s_9, REPORT_AGGREGATE(((SUM("Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT CALL STATISTICS"."TIME - ACD CALL HANDLING"+"Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT CALL STATISTICS"."TIME - AFTER CALL WORK (ACW)")+SUM("Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."AVAILABLE TIME"))/60)/(COUNT(DISTINCT "Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."DATE ID")*"Team Performance"."FACT - AGENT TIME STATISTICS"."INTERVAL TYPE") BY CASE WHEN '30 Mins Interval' ='15 Mins Interval' THEN "Team Performance"."DIMENSION - TIME"."15 Mins Interval" ELSE "Team Performance"."DIMENSION - TIME"."30 Mins Interval" END, CASE WHEN "Team Performance"."DIMENSION - TEAM"."ROLE" ='TEAM LEADER' THEN 'Team Leader' ELSE "Team Performance"."DIMENSION - TEAM"."TEAM" END) s_10 FROM "Team Performance" WHERE (("DIMENSION - TIME"."BUSINESS DATE" BETWEEN timestamp '2012-11-23 00:00:00' AND timestamp '2012-11-23 00:00:00') AND ("DIMENSION - LOCATION"."COUNTRY CODE" = 'US') AND ("DIMENSION - LOCATION".DEPARTMENT = 'CSG')) ) djm FETCH FIRST 65001 ROWS ONLY

Back up your repository before following these steps:
1 Reduce the problem report to minimum number of columns required to generate the error. This will usually identify which dimension and which fact are incompatible.
2 Open the repository in the Administration tool and verify that the dimension and fact table join at the physical layer of the repository
3 Verify that there is a complex join between the dimension and the fact in the business layer.
4 Check the logical table sources for the fact table. At least one of them must have the Content tab set to a level in the hierarchy that represents the problem dimension. This is usually the detailed level.
5 Check the logical table source Content tab for the dimension table. Unless there is a valid reason, this should be set to blank.
6. Save any changes to the repository.

Is it ok? if we have 42 million records in a single fact table!!

Hello,
We have three outstanding fact tables, and we need to add one more fact type, and we were thinking whether we can do two different fact tables, or can we put the values in one of the same fact table which is similar, but the records are upto 42 million if we add ,so my question is having a single fact table with all records, or breaking it down, to two different ones!!!Thnx!!

I am not sure what is an "outstanding fact" or an "fact type". A 42m fact table doesn't necessarily indicate you are doing something wrong although it does sound as odd. I would expect most facts to be small as they should have aggregated measures to speed up report. In some cases you may want to drill down to the detailed transaction level in which case you may find these large facts. But care should be taken not to allow users to query on this fact without user the "transaction ID" which obviously should be indexed and should guarantee that queries will be quick.
Guessing from your post (as it is not clear not descriptive enough) it would seem to imply that you are adding a new dimension to your fact and that will cause the fact to increase it's row count to 42m. That probably means that you are changing the granularity of the fact. That may or may not be correct, depending on your model.

Count of id's inside FACT TABLE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for