CPU Usage: Performance questions

Hi,
i've a two node rac 11.2 on aix.
There are some nightly job that consume high cpu.
Looking awr i see:
Load Profile              Per Second    Per Transaction   Per Exec   Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~         ---------------    --------------- ---------- ----------
      DB Time(s):                7.1                0.0       0.00       0.07
       DB CPU(s):                1.0                0.0       0.00       0.01
       Redo size:        1,633,163.0            2,639.6
   Logical reads:          112,042.4              181.1
   Block changes:           10,777.0               17.4
  Physical reads:              286.1                0.5
Physical writes:              174.2                0.3
      User calls:              105.3                0.2
          Parses:            1,172.9                1.9
     Hard parses:               30.2                0.1
W/A MB processed:               11.0                0.0
          Logons:                0.8                0.0
        Executes:            8,386.1               13.6
       Rollbacks:                0.1                0.0
    Transactions:              618.7Top events:
                                                           Avg
                                                          wait   % DB
Event                                 Waits     Time(s)   (ms)   time Wait Class
DB CPU                                            7,215          14.1
db file sequential read             882,357       2,914      3    5.7 User I/O
resmgr:cpu quantum                  406,418       1,915      5    3.7 Scheduler
buffer busy waits                   192,071         466      2     .9 Concurrenc
gc cr grant 2-way                   253,278         298      1     .6 ClusterHost cpu:
Host CPU (CPUs:    6 Cores:    3 Sockets: )
~~~~~~~~         Load Average
               Begin       End     %User   %System      %WIO     %Idle
               14.23      5.11      58.5      18.0       1.9      23.5It shows 23.5% of idle cpu.
Looking vmstat for the period:
DATA     RUN     BCK     AVM     FRE     PRE     PPI     PPO     PFR     PSR     PCY     FIN     FSY     FCS     Cpu User     Cpu Sys     Cpu Idle     Cpu Wait
01/14/2013 22:33:54     16     0     6639173     8973     0     0     0     0     0     0     3716     124593     17276     87     13     0     0
01/14/2013 22:33:55     15     0     6639055     9073     0     0     0     0     0     0     3799     122613     17578     89     11     0     0
01/14/2013 22:33:55     14     0     6636873     11234     0     0     0     0     0     0     3144     108492     16358     90     10     0     0There is no idle.
Looking Active sessions graphs:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/855/graph01.jpg/
So, why AWR show only 14.5% ob db cpu and 23.5% of idle and vmstat and active session history show 0 of idle?
Thank you.
Edited by: 842366 on 15-gen-2013 7.53

842366 wrote:
i've a two node rac 11.2 on aix.
There are some nightly job that consume high cpu.
Looking awr i see:
Load Profile              Per Second    Per Transaction   Per Exec   Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~         ---------------    --------------- ---------- ----------
DB Time(s):                7.1                0.0       0.00       0.07
DB CPU(s):                1.0                0.0       0.00       0.01
Redo size:        1,633,163.0            2,639.6
Logical reads:          112,042.4              181.1
Block changes:           10,777.0               17.4
Physical reads:              286.1                0.5
Physical writes:              174.2                0.3
User calls:              105.3                0.2
Parses:            1,172.9                1.9
Hard parses:               30.2                0.1
W/A MB processed:               11.0                0.0
Logons:                0.8                0.0
Executes:            8,386.1               13.6
Rollbacks:                0.1                0.0
Transactions:              618.7[/code]
Top events:
Avg
wait   % DB
Event                                 Waits     Time(s)   (ms)   time Wait Class
DB CPU                                            7,215          14.1
db file sequential read             882,357       2,914      3    5.7 User I/O
resmgr:cpu quantum                  406,418       1,915      5    3.7 Scheduler
buffer busy waits                   192,071         466      2     .9 Concurrenc
gc cr grant 2-way                   253,278         298      1     .6 Cluster[/code]
Host CPU (CPUs:    6 Cores:    3 Sockets: )
~~~~~~~~         Load Average
Begin       End     %User   %System      %WIO     %Idle
14.23      5.11      58.5      18.0       1.9      23.5[/code]
Is this a standard one-hour report, and does it cross the peak hour of the graph you published, and is it for the same node ?
There are several anomalies here, not the least of which is that your event percentages don't get close to 100%.
To me the thing that really stands out as a possible source of your problems is the 8,386 executions per second - if there has been a recent dramatic change in performance, it may be related to this.
I'd be taking a quick look at the SQL ordered by CPU and SQL ordered by Executions sections of the report for any clues.
I'd also be cross checking the Time model and OS statistics, and instance activity CPU details to see if they were consistent with the Event figures.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis

Similar Messages

  • Logic Pro 9: CPU usage

    I could definitely use some help!
    I am a well experience Logic Pro 9 user, and I am having some serious issues with CPU usage.  I have a Mac Mini Server with a 2 GHz Core i7 and 8 GB of 1333 MHz DDR3 RAM.  With my current system, I run all of my applications and operating system on a dedicated internal HD.  All my sessions are run from a seperate internal HD.
    Typically I don't experience many issues with CPU usage with exception of this project.  Every 5 seconds I get this error.
    "System Overload.
    The audio engine was not able to process all required data in time.
    (-10011)"
    I have tried everything under the sun and even the old "who's your father" trick to eliminate this issue.  NOTHING has worked yet.  Here's what I've done so far: 
    1. Increase my buffer size to it's max at 1024 samples.
    2. Freeze all tracks which I use heavy processing plugins.
    3. Flatten and merge all take folders.
    4. Merge all audio regions.
    5. Delete all unused audio regions in my bin.
    6. Set all channels to "No Input"
    7. Close out of all other programs.
    8. Turn off WiFi.
    9. Turn off Bluetooth
    I'm currently running 35 audio tracks, 3 Aux tracks and 0 midi tracks.  I have very little automation, and I'm not using Flex time. I have never experience this much CPU usage ever, and it's driving me INSANE.
    Any help is grealy appreciated.

    What does the Drive/CPU usage (Performance) metering look like in Logic? That overload error can mean a lot of different things. Typically... it's a system bus overload and can be caused by Logic's Space Designer and/or Delay Designer. What is the Process Buffer Range set at?
    Have you tried a project of this size since upgrading to 10.8.4? 
    Curious, what sample rate are you using?
    I like AOL's idea of importing each track, might narrow it down.

  • How to monitor CPU usage and performance on a Hyper-V server with several VM's

    I have a server that is running Windows 2008 64 bit Hyper-V, with 8 gigs of RAM and Intel Xeon X3440 @ 2.53 Ghz, which gives me 8 logical cores in the performance monitor on the host system.
    I have set up three Virtual Machines, all running Windows 2008 32 bit.
    Build server, running Team City
    Staging server
    SQL Server, running SQL Server 2005
    I have some troubles with the setup in that the host monitor remains responsive at all times, even though the VM's are seemingly working at 100% cpu and are very sluggish and unresponsive. (I have asked a separate question about that.)
    So the question here is: What is the best way to monitor how the physical CPU's are actually utilized? The reason I am asking is that I am being told that i cannot reliably use the task manager to monitor CPU usage in a VM.

    First, you have to remember that in Hyper-V that the "host" is called a parent partition and it really just like a virtualized guest with special permissions and roles. Just like any other child/guest, when you open up Task Manager, you can not see the CPU
    usage of the other children on the server.
    Ben Armstrong has a good explanation of this here:http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2008/02/28/hyper-v-virtual-machine-cpu-usage-and-task-manager.aspx
    To summarize his post, you need to check three things to get an accurate picture of CPU utilization:
    View the CPU usage on each guest - this is available through Hyper-V Manager or Performance Monitor.
    CPU usage due to context switching - this is the perfmon counter called % Hypervisor Run Timeunder Hyper-V Hypervisor Virtual Processor
    Child partition worker process - vmwp.exe running on the parent partition (1 per child). This handles Hyper-V operations like saving
    state.

  • System Performance window and CPU usage

    The System Performance window shows two bars - what do these mean? My guess would be for dual cpu, on my quad only two show up but I assume that's because Apple needs to update to show all four?
    Related question - when doing a torture test on my quad, Logic seems to show almost full CPU usage and choke while Activity Monitor only has logic using about 130% of available cpu (out of 400%). Processor load seems to be split equally between all four (none of which seem to be averaging over 50%). On a dual, how close does Logic get to 200%? Is there anything I can do to get Logic to use more of the available CPU power?
    I'm running an assortment of softsynths, most with Space Designer (do longer verbs in SD use more CPU?).
    Along these same lines, are there any standard Logic benchmarks?

    They indicate multiple processors if audio is subdivided. It is most likely Logic hasn't got a CPU meter update-don't the quads simply operate as pairs per core-fuctionally similar to a Dual but when it comes to the processor the duties are split, as opposed to 4 procs it works more like 2 coupled...
    Longer IRs require more calculations, they add up really fast, esp. at higher sampling rates-because the IRs convert to the host (session) rate, as opposed to the rate the IR is.

  • Question about CPU usage for video playback

    I've asked a related question already on the Safari forum, but would like some clarification, please.
    The speed of this iMac is 400 MHZ and whenever I go to YouTube or almost any other site that requires video I see that the CPU usage can peak way up at 80% or more. I have Flash 9 installed which has a minimum of 500 MHZ, so I get pretty choppy video, but that's not the issue here. I can live with that. I keep any other applications closed. I'm often running a small fan over the top of the iMac to help vent the buildup of heat. I can monitor the temperature at the Hard Drive and I suppose that gives me an idea, of sorts, about general temperature conditions inside.
    The answer I got was that this kind of CPU usage could be detrimental to the processor as it builds up excessive heat and to keep this kind of video to a minimum.
    My question is can anyone roughly suggest what a maximum time on YouTube, for example, would be, 2 minutes, 5 minutes, is 10 minutes too long? I have plenty of RAM at 768. Some guidelines?
    Thanks.

    Hey WZZZ,
    Thanks for the star and kind words.
    I'm the de facto Mac guy at my kids' school and we have around 25 iMac Slot Loaders working there. You can imagine they get abused quite a bit. There are 10 running Garage Band in the Music Department. That puts a tremendous strain on the CPU and I'm actually surprised that they run it so well. My son had a 600 iMac running GarageBand, he was complaining that it was getting jumpy and when I looked at it he was running 10 unlocked tracks simultaneously! So now he has an eMac G4 800 and that of course runs a lot better.
    So to sum up, with all the abuse of those machines in terms of the CPUs the problems I have with them have nothing to do with that. The problems have more to do with parts of the OS that they toss, headphone jacks abused, CDs jammed in the slots, and the like.
    A couple of other related things. I've got Hardware Monitor, demo, installed and I think it reported it could only find the hard drive sensor, if I'm not mistaken - nothing else on this Mac with a sensor. Is that right?
    I see references to CPU sensors on 400 iMacs but on the 400 I have here for repair Temperature Monitor reports no sensors. Perhaps there were different versions of the 400.
    But very good to hear that the fan is a good idea for CRT related things. Should I keep the fan running-mostly for that hard core CRT stuff- even if the computer is sleeping and the room temp. is only around 62-64 F.? (We need to put on warm clothes to sit in front of this thing now, but worth it to keep this old machine happy).
    On the one I did the fan pushed the airflow in the direction of the passive flow of the iMac - in at the bottom and out the grill by the handle.
    One more question, more out of curiosity than anything else: If I move this small clip-on fan close to the case - right now it's about 3 feet away and the image is stable - the screen begins to flicker and flutter quite a lot. My theory is that that's happening not necessarily because of electro-magnetic interference from the fan motor, but rather, because the back of the tube is getting cooled unevenly. What do you think?
    Well the classic failures that I see in the iMac are in this order:
    1) Dielectric breakdown of the flyback transformers internal insulation. This is heat/age related and a common problem with CRTs in general.
    2) Breakdown of high voltage electolytic capacitors and regular high voltage capacitors on the neck board and PAV supply.
    3) Solder problems with the flyback itself. This is diagnosed by the upside down boot technique.
    I used to repair these problems but now it's easier for me to swap the Firewire boards into working 350s. I've got 12 of those in the basement currently.
    Richard

  • Acrobat very Slow performance (50% CPU usage)

    My acrobat 9 PRO (9.3.2) has suddently started to use 50% of my CPU usage everytime a *.pdf document is opened.
    It is the task Acrobat.exe which is the problem. This results in VERY slow performance and I cannot use the review function without adobe is crashing!
    This has not always been a problem!
    Does anyone know why this is happening?
    I have tried to uninstall and reinstall acrobat, without any luck!
    Thanks
    Peder

    You probably have the same problem as I do. I use version 9.3.3 on a fairly powerful machine with Windows vista. In my case, the problem is related to the weblink.api (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/675941?tstart=0). I also uninstalled, reinstalled, repaired - nothing helps.

  • Re: Satellite Pro M70 - High CPU Usage - Low Performance

    I sincerely hope someone can help. I do not consider myself really computer illiterate, but this is where my understanding ends and I would truly value all help offered.
    I have a Toshiba Satellite Pro M70 of 2 yrs old and I am a definite advocate for Toshiba. However, my operating system is slow. Average day usage with Internet Explorer and Office 2007 is a painstaking process that takes too long. I have had conflicts with Trend Micro Internet Security 2008, which works perfectly.
    But starting up the computer takes ages. CPU usage is usually high and System Idle Processes as well. I have reinstalled Windows XP from the Toshiba Boot DVD already 4 times with starting fresh and installing everything time and time again. Each time after getting everything up to speed again, the performance is disappointing.
    I have extended RAM to 1,49 GB which made little difference from the original 1/3 of RAM. It seems that something is slowing down the computer, but this is not visable in the processes; other than quite a few svhost.exe processes that take little processing capacity nor CPU usage.
    I have used Windows Gold Certified Uniblue Power Suite with a good registry cleaner. This helps a bit, but after a couple of days it seems to get only worse. I have an Intel Pentium M 1.73 GHz processor. Research online reveals that Trend Micro IS 2008 is quite good and demanding little capacity in comparison to competing security packages.
    Is this system/software related or could this be a hardware issue?
    Thanks in advance to all!

    Hi!
    This definitively not a hardware issue and I think should try to optimize some Windows settings to make your notebook faster.
    At first you should clean the start up folder. Remove all programs that you dont need at start up. For example I dont have programs in the start up folder.
    Furthermore you can customize the start up programs in msconfig (start => run => msconfig). There you can disable more programs that you dont need. Its your choice what do disable or enable.
    You can improve the performance if you defragment your HDD from time time.
    Remove all programs and trial software that you dont need and after this clean the registry. You can use CCleaner as Jimi said.
    Try an other antivirus program. Maybe TrendMicro is not full compatible to the software that you use. I use AntiVir.
    Bye

  • Any suggession on Tools for Performance testing of application designed for Blackberry phones.. which can get some details on CPU usage, memory, response time?? any help on the same is much appriciated.

    Hi Team,
    Any suggession on Tools for Performance testing of application designed for Blackberry phones.. which can get some details on CPU usage, memory, response time?? any help on the same is much appriciated.
    Thank You,
    Best Regards,
    neeraj

    Hi Team,
    Any suggession on Tools for Performance testing of application designed for Blackberry phones.. which can get some details on CPU usage, memory, response time?? any help on the same is much appriciated.
    Thank You,
    Best Regards,
    neeraj

  • CPU Usage Question between Premier and Media Encoder

    Hey guys,
    Here is the question. I just built a new machine with the following specs:
    Intel i7 2.66GHz process overclocked to 3.2GHz
    12GB Memory
    Nvidia 260 Overclocked video card.
    When I export a video from Adobe Premier into Media Encoder, all 8 cores peg out at 100% and thus my CPU temp get hot really quick (78 - 80 degrees Celsius)
    Now if I take the same original video file and just drag it into Media Encoder, my 8 cores only show about 24-40% usage and the temp only gets to around 55-60 degrees Celsius.
    What is causing such a big difference in CPU usage? I'm afraid to use Adobe Premier as it causes the CPUs to max out everytime. I want to edit my videos, but as stuck with just using AME on the original files.

    I suspect its simply because in the first case Pr and AME are both running. In the later, just ame loading the Pr project. In the forst case two projects are running simultaneously, the one in Pr and a temp copy in AME.
    But more troublesome to me is why youve built a system that cant be maxed out. IN editing, we Want the CPUs to peg to process as fast as possible. IMHO; You should re-think the design of your workstation if it overheats so easily.
    Curt

  • Swing performance question: CPU-bound

    Hi,
    I've posted a Swing performance question to the java.net performance forum. Since it is a Swing performance question, I thought readers of this forum might also be interested.
    Swing CPU-bound in sun.awt.windows.WToolkit.eventLoop
    http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=1636&tstart=0
    Thanks,
    Curt

    You obviously don't understand the results, and the first reply to your posting on java.net clearly explains what you missed.
    The event queue is using Thread.wait to sleep until it gets some more events to dispatch. You have incorrectly diagnosed the sleep waiting as your performance bottleneck.

  • Performance depends on hardware for CPU usage below 50%?

    I need to assess whether we should move our service to more capable hardware. At present our bandwidth is about 25 megabit out of our gigabit link and typical CPU usage is about 10-40%. I want to know whether FMS will stream with less lag or does that purely depend on client upstream bandwidth?
    Cheers.

    So there's a couple of pieces you care about here.
    1. In your Application.xml your <Live> tag will have settings for queueing aggregate messages (both in size and in time).  That will induce delay into your stream (up to a single GOP (keyframe interval)) but will save you oodles of CPU on not having to deliver single messages to clients.  However, as mentioned you pay for it in stream latency of about a keyframe interval.
    2. The CPU chart from your system is more accurate - FMS historically reported CPU percentage that ONLY FMS is using.  I'm not a big fan of that stat since it's deceptive, (only 40% CPU the system must be fine - but only if the other 60% is free) - anyway that can't be changed currently thanks to backward compatability issues .  While I can't recommend against it, I will say it's not our most useful stat.
    LMK what you find with the live stream queueing, that's more relevant to your performance characteristics on live.
    Asa

  • Weak performance and high cpu usage

    I've been wondering for sometime now, how can some flash games run so laggy on my pc at the same time where i run DX and OpenGL games without any problem and smooth!
    Whenever i play games in FB or any other site, i notice high cpu usage about 70-90% especially when i run them fullscreen (1152x864) and with effects enabled then my system kneals almost!!!!!! This is UNACCEPTABLE of course..
    I also found an interesting article which i dought if it has been updated as it was supposed to, which is the following link: http://forums.adobe.com/message/5417983#5417983
    I run Flash player on an Intel E5700 - Win XP sp3 - 4GB ram and an Nvidia GTX650.. for those who understand, such a system is in position to run flash games like an adult holds a baby in his arms... so either the hardware acceleration does not work or adobe has let this problem unresolved for years now as i have made an interesting research on this case before i come here.
    For the records, i run flash games within Chrome since it's proved to be the most apropriate browser for videos and flash-shockwave games.. firefox comes 2nd to me and IE 8.....leave it unused better!
    Even in 2006 up to today, people are facing high cpu usage and weak performance in flash apps no matter what pc they have, so who is to blame here?? Adobe ofc.
    Is there anyone who has a solution to propose or has found somethin relevant to this case? Or should we wait a solution in 2020?

    Mike M., i didn't give any load or credit on u, but Adobe, as i see you're not responsible for their mistakes or ignorance so i have nothin to ask from u, i have seen that u reply to ppl and good for u.
    All i have to say to what u replied, is that, what if win xp reach the end of life? i mention a problem that remains for years now and is unresolved, or didn't they see that the previous years?since 2008 let's say!!!
    I have noticed the same exactly behavior on newer OS and specifically tested on Win Vista 32-64 and Win 7 32-64 too..... it's EXACTLY the same behavior, so it's not OS dependant, i won't take any excuse for Adobe cause i have experienced their terrible work on flash-shockwave for too long.
    It's their responsibility to solve it but they have chosen to ignore this and many other mistakes that users report weekly for years, their response is 2/10 solved... it's just disgusting. I dont' want to argue with anyone for Adobe's shake, they don't worth it.

  • CPU usage very high, performance low

    Using activity monitor, I gauge my cpu usage to be between 50 and 60 percent, with the Activity Monitor being THE ONLY APPLICATION OPEN! There are only two events which I can remotely correlate to this problem: downloading and using a new version of Firefox (3.07) and downloading and using Amadeus so I could listen to a Wiki file.
    When I open Firefox or any other application, CPU usage goes straight to 100%. Then the machine slows down significantly. Any ideas?

    You guys are not going to believe this! I did some searching where I discovered this comment by a user on MacRumors (sp?) named "cyantist:"
    "For some reason I remember having this issue a while back, and the solution was this: right-click on the desktop > show view options > deselect show item info. It worked for me, but it wasn't Finder that was giving me 100% cpu, it was Safari or Camino."
    Well, I couldn't really figure out what he had done but I right-clicked on the desktop>More>Configure Folder Actions> disable Folder Actions. Voila! Finder and mds dropped off the Activity Monitor list with percentages less than 1. Yikes! I did some experimentation and it turns out that all one has to do IS RIGHT-CLICK ON THE DESKTOP! At first, I thought it was toggling every time I selected and deselected "Enable Folder Actions," but doggone if the Finder and mds didn't drop off the map by simply right-clicking on the desktop. Bizarre! Now, with Activity Monitor and Firefox open, the cpu is running between 10% and 20%. Go figure! I'm not going to mark this problem as solved until someone chimes in with a reasonable explanation (which might come from . . . The Twilight Zone . . . )

  • Google Earth Plugin and LabVIEW: High CPU usage when adding placemarks

    Hi,
    I posted this question on stackoverflow earlier this week but feel it might be better suited to the LabVIEW community specifically so I'm reposting here:
    I'm writing an application which uses the Google Earth Plugin to display events on the globe. Each event is a single point kml placemark with an icon which is a 3kb png file. Placemarks are uploaded to the plugin as they are received by the software. I am experiencing increasing CPU usage with the number of placemarks that are added.
    I have tested displaying a new placemark every second and running until the software running the plugin completely froze (graph attached). The GEPlugin (green trace) stopped responding (i.e. the globe did not respond to the mouse) at around 1200 placemarks added and CPU usage was at ~30%. When the software itself (red trace) froze the plugin was using around 50% CPU and ~3700 placemarks had been added). After the freeze, no new placemarks were added which caused the software to respond (but not the plugin) so I could clear all the placemarks. After the placemarks were cleared from the globe, the CPU usage of the plugin returned to around 5% CPU.
    So what I've seen is that GEPlugin CPU usage increases linearly with each kml placemark added. Is this the expected behaviour/ a normal limitation of the plugin? If not is there a more efficient way of adding many placemarks to the globe?
    I am using GEPlugin version 7.1.1.1580 (API version 1.010) and LabVIEW 12.0f3
    Please see the test results attached. Any input greatly appreciated!
    Original stackoverflow post:
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20994323/google-earth-plugin-with-labview-high-cpu-usage-when-add...
    Attachments:
    Performance Log 020114_095115.png ‏82 KB

    Hello,
    I have had a look at your graphs and understood what you are trying to do. To me it seems that as the image gets more complex it gets harde to render which wold likely cause increase in CPU usage resulting in the freeze. I would suggest you try running the program on anoher computer to check on the RAM front of things. If this is a limitation of the GE Plugin then unfortunately I can not do much to help, but if you think this is a problem coming from your LabVIEW code then you can post your code here and I can take a look.

  • Windows 8.1 CPU Usage being used by Service Hosts

    My problem has been persistant for several of days and I really need my CPU usage. Some Service Hosts using sometimes up to 50% of my CPU usage. I have tried using the Refresh tool in the advanced settings
    which deletes everything installed to the computer to no prevail. I have even come to the idea of resetting to factory settings but I am beginning to think that the problem will still persist. I have seen several people have this problem with no solution that
    is visible. I have not installed anything to make my CPU usage do this, I have clicked Run then typed in Services.msc and did some things in there. I saw somewhere that the Windows Modules Installer was one of those "CPU-eaters" along with Windows
    Search, so I set there Start Up Type to Manual and put them to a halt. I will put a picture for these Service Host files and how much power each one individually takes. Before the Refresh I would click on the services and then try to end their task, still
    no prevail. Please tell me how I can fix this, I don't really see a need to post my speculations for my computer since it is happening to a lot of other people on Windows 8.1, not a selected few. I hope someone will read my post through and help me, because
    this is troublesome and limits the performance of my PC. Thank you for reading, I hope you have some solutions for my situation.
    Images
    As for the first image, I am showing you the Windows Module Installer Worker using up some CPU, and I am not installing a Windows update by the way.
    As for the second image, I really don't understand what is happening since they are labeled all the same but numbers and networks. But still, they are eating at my usage, just one service taking up 40% is uncalled for in my books. Also,
    as the Service Host rises, the System coincides with it too, rising at the same time. I really don't know how to go about fixing the Hosts. Maybe a downgrade to Windows 7 which I don't have? The most recent version of Windows I have on file is Windows Vista,
    and well, I don't really want to go that far back.
    When I tried to submit my question, I got some red text saying "Body text cannot contain images or links until we are able to verify your account.", and I don't really feel like waiting for that,
    so you are just going to have to go off of the summaries I gave you. Sorry.

    Hi,
    Can you use process explorer to narrow down the culprit?
    Process Explorer v16.02
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx
    Alex Zhao
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for

  • Agent Assignment in Process Controlled workflows

    1. For testing one-level approval, I activated the one-step apparoval shopping cart BC set. while creating the shopping cart it is showing the manager id. But when manager logs in, there is no workitems, Also if I check from workflow log I cannot see

  • [SOLVED] - How to Rename a Win 7 Computer Using Powershell (deployment)

    For those who just want to know what I'm trying to do here's my question: How I can programmatically rename machines during the auditSystem/auditUser portion of Sysprep using PowerShell? What is the exact command and/or function should I be issuing?

  • Another CSS layout question

    Hi! I have finally ditched tables and I'm now doing my first div-based css layout. At times I still feel totally lost like in this example. I can't seem to get the page subtitle ("Etusivu") to move down from the top of the div it is in. I tried diffe

  • Black point compensation

    I have a problem with Black Point Compensation in the print dialog when printing my book pages. It almost seems that the on/off toggle is reversed. I usually have BPC on when printing in Photoshop and I can preview its effect there. I use Relative Co

  • Creating a xml service defination

    Before 10g I had a sdf.jar which allowed me to create a service defination from an activity diagram. Does anyone know how I can accomplish this in 10g?