Create an Object(Store) based on Store Id,it should display Store Name

Hi,
My Question is, Create an Object(Store) based on Store Id,it should display Store name at report level.
I did the list of values Name changed from Store Id to Store Name in Object Properties in Universe level. These values are changed in the universe level, but not displaying in Report level. How it is possible? can any one give the reply.
Thanks & Regards
Madhu...

What i understand is you wan the user to be prompted with STORE_ID values and when they select a store_id or multiple store _id then you want to display the store names for these store _id selected in the report . If this is correct then follow below
In Universe create a object whose definition is store_name and not store id. In the LOV of this object click edit and then in the LOV add STOREID, STORE_NAME COLUMN with STORE_ID so now the user will see the store-id and the store name for that store_id but when you select any values it will show only the store name.

Similar Messages

How to create conditional text? (based on selected option, different text displays)

Hello, and thank you in advance for any assistance.
I need to create a .pdf with conditional text. Ideally, the user would select (via checkboxes) certain options, and only the text relevant to those selections would be included in the .pdf. Is this possible in Acrobat? If so, how? If not, what tool accomplishes this?
Many thanks.

Sorry 'bout that ! I was responding from e-mail and as you can see it's not working quite right. This is what I had wrote;
Tools ? What do you mean tools ? Adobe Acrobat is your tool. :-)
If you don't know javascript then you should entertain learning some if
you wish to "extend" Acrobat. That's the nature of the beast.
You may find some precompiled javascripts; but if you want customization
then you'll either have to pay someone to do it or yeah, learn javascript.
Check out Acrobatusers.com they have an excellent Acrobat Javascript section.
Best Regards,
Steve
Message was edited by: S.D.A.

Create "Object" Type based on columns of a table

Hi Experts
is it possible to create an Object Type based on columns of a table?
for example the syntax for creation of type is
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE temp_t
AS OBJECT (ID number, code number)
can we create a type that is based on columns of an existing table? so that we donot have to write down all the column names in each type as i have to create types based on 100 and above tables :-s
Please help me out here!
Best Regards

You cannot do that Zia, check below code:
SQL> create or replace type temp_t as object(object_name all_objects.object_name%TYPE);
2 /
Warning: Type created with compilation errors.
SQL> sho err
Errors for TYPE TEMP_T:
LINE/COL ERROR
0/0 PL/SQL: Compilation unit analysis terminated
1/35 PLS-00201: identifier 'ALL_OBJECTS.OBJECT_NAME' must be declared

Createing string objects

String s= new String("abc");
String s1="abc";Is there any performence issue between these two?
I think both will take same time to create objects.

Yes, there is a performance implication.
When using the first line String s = new String("abc"); you are actually creating two objects. As a general rule, you should never use a String class constructor when initializing to a literal value. Even doing String s = new String("abc" + someVariable) is creating one more object than needed. "abc" is the firs object, the result of "abc" + someVariable is the second object, and the String created by the constructor is the third.
It should be noted most recent JVMs use some level of caching of String Literal value objects (I believe this goes as far back as JDK 1.3), such that "abc" is only be created once by the JVM (though I'm not sure if it will cache all literal String objects or use some type of LRU algorthm to discard some of them). Regardless, there is some level of efficiency you get from the JVM doing this. Thus if a method containing String s = "abc" is called repeatedly, a reference to the same String object should be used everytime; there will be no further creations of the object as long as the JVM keeps it in cache.
Using String s= new String("abc") will leverage the cached literal reference to "abc", but also creates a new instance of String to refer to the literal everytime your method is called. This is much less efficient.
Run the following code (I did it using JDK 6):
package org.einsteinium.samples;
public class StringTest {
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          String s1 = "abc";
          String s2 = "abc";
          boolean equalMethodTest = s1.equals(s2);
          System.out.println("Are the objects the same using the equals method? " + equalMethodTest);
          boolean equalOperatorTest = (s1 == s2);
          System.out.println("Are the objects the same using the equal operator? " + equalOperatorTest);
}It will print:
Are the objects the same using the equals method? true
Are the objects the same using the equal operator? trueNow if you re-write it to:
package org.einsteinium.samples;
public class StringTest {
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          String s1 = new String("abc");
          String s2 = "abc";
          boolean equalMethodTest = s1.equals(s2);
          System.out.println("Are the objects the same using the equals method? " + equalMethodTest);
          boolean equalOperatorTest = (s1 == s2);
          System.out.println("Are the objects the same using the equal operator? " + equalOperatorTest);
}it will print:
Are the objects the same using the equals method? true
Are the objects the same using the equal operator? falseI hope this helps some.

How do I create an object store on JMQ 2.0?

I have a question about creating an object store in JMQ 2.0 using the
administration tool.
The documentation doesn't explain it that clearly because it says for
development purposes, you should be able to get away with the default
configuration. The default configuration as far as I can see has no object
store for JNDI lookup.
What I need is an object store that I can connect with using an
InitialContextFactory to the broker URL. I'd like to then use that
Connection to lookup ConnectionFactories (topic and queue).
Again, I thought the documentation would explain all of this, but haven't
been able to find anything. Please advise.

To answer your question, you can use the 'jmqadmin'
(graphical interface) or 'jmqobjmgr' (command line interface)
to configure administered objects that you store in a
JNDI service provider. This object store has to be set up
in advance which may mean creating a directory if a file store
is used, or setting up an LDAP server.
Here as the basic steps to add administered objects
if you're using the graphical implementation ('jmqadmin'):
1. Set up some sort of object store repository outside the admin
tool (you can use LDAP or create a file system directory).
2. Add an Object Store connection to the repository you
just set up:
- Run 'jmqadmin', click on the tree node "JMQ Object Stores".
- Select Actions->Add Object Store.
- Name this Object Store with a value in "Object Store Label".
- Fill in the values for java.naming.factory.initial
and java.naming.provider.url and any other necessary JNDI values.
- Select OK
3. To add objects to this object store you just set up:
- First make a connection to this store:
Select Actions->Connect to Object Store
- Click on the "Destinations" or "Connection Factories" node
under this object store.
- Click on Actions->Add Destination Object or Add Connection Factory Object
and fill in the values in the dialog.

How to create unique objects in class and store

Hi, I have a class that opens a text file and reads in the
lines. each line holds an ip address. i need to create x amount of
objects, and each object is assigned a unique ip address from the file.
and here i am stuck. the class reads in the file, then i think it should create an object for each line read in and assign that object the ip address. i want to store the objects in some sort of array or collection, and i guess each object will need a unique name, but i dont know how many objects until i read in the file and count the number of lines. can anyone give me any pointers as to how i should create/store the objects
many thanx
ness

You could use your own object:
public class Test {
public class IPNumber {
    public int ip;
    public IPNumber(int ip) {
      this.ip = ip;
public Test() {
    int numberOfIPs = 5; // this is your number of lines
    IPNumber[] ips = new IPNumber[numberOfIPs];
    for (int i = 0; i < numberOfIPs; i++) ips[i] = new IPNumber(i); // assign ip address from file
public static void main(String args[]){
    new Test();
}or you could store the ips as strings:
public class Test {
public Test() {
    final int numberOfIPs = 5; // this is your number of lines
    final java.util.ArrayList al = new java.util.ArrayList(numberOfIPs);
    for (int i = 0; i < numberOfIPs; i++) al.add(""+i); // assign ip address from file
public static void main(String args[]){
    new Test();
}p.s Objects don't have names

Why when I create a object in system automaticlly store in $TMP?

Hi, all
As title, when I create a object in my quality system , always automatically store the object in the $TMP,
I have to modify it from menu Goto->Object Directory Entry-> Change Package.
I hope when I crate a object automatically store in the package NOT $TMP.
Edited by: xuehui li on Jul 9, 2010 4:50 AM

Hi, But when I create a new DTP NO asking me let me create or select a place to store. Just automatically store in $TMP immediately!
So I have to go to menu 'Goto-> Object Directory Entry->' modify the package from $TMP to my working package.
so it is very strange! I think for sure there is somewhere to set up this option to DONOT store at $TMP automatically instead of asking for me store in where.
Edited by: xuehui li on Jul 9, 2010 5:20 AM
Edited by: xuehui li on Jul 9, 2010 5:22 AM

Where should I store objects in my design

Hello guys,
I have a system that needs to store various kinds of information such as users, publications, meetings etc. I have various objects describing that sort of information but I am having a hard time choosing where to store the objects inside the design.
Quick overview of the system: I have a SystemAdmin who registers users. I have a RegisteredUser who makes publications and meetings. I have Publications and Meetings.
Where should I store the objects created by all these classes? Where should I store the "RegisteredUser" or the "Publication"? Should I use a "super" class with a bunch of collection objects or is it a bad design?
I would like to avoid using a DBMS, but if you think it would get messy otherwise, I can give it a go. Thanks

If you want to do this right, you should definitely be starting your design using a DBMS. Once that's done, you can look at EJB 3 or Spring as a persistance layer to your exterprise java app.
In today's world, it is smart to decouple your data, storage, and application layers. The buzz word being DECOUPLE

A dynamic table based on run-time created view object -- please help!

Hello!
I'm trying to create a dynamic table based on an run-time created view object. All go ok, but table binding component take the first view/iterator state and don't reflect changes they have. Please, take a look:
1. At run-time the view is being replaced by new red-only one based on query in application module:
getQueryView().remove();
createViewObjectFromQueryStmt("QueryView", statement);
2. Page definition file contains an iterator (using iterator or methodIterator - doesn't matter) binding and table, which binds to the iterator, like:
<methodIterator id="distributeQuery1Iter" Binds="distributeQuery1.result"
DataControl="QueryServiceDataControl" RangeSize="10"/>
<table id="distributeQuery11" IterBinding="distributeQuery1Iter"/>
3. The page code uses <af:table>. But, if I use table binding (it's right) like this:
<af:table var="row" value="#{bindings.distributeQuery11.collectionModel}">
<af:forEach items="#{bindings.distributeQuery11.attributeDefs}" var="def">
the table will never changed (i.e. still show the first view instance).
When I tried to use iterator binding directly (it's bad and cannot provide all needed features unlike CollectionModel from table binding) I saw that table works!
(Code is somehing like:
<af:table var="row" value="#{bindings.myIterator.allRowsInRange}">
<af:forEach items="#{bindings.myIterator.attributeDefs}" var="def">
Why the table binding do not reflect changes in iterator? Or should I use different approach?
Thanks in advance!
Ilya.

I got it to work! I used a hybrid approach comprised of some of your code and some of Steve Muench's AcceessAppModuleInBackingBean example.
In the setBindings method, I execute an app module method that redefines the query, then I used your code to delete and recreate bindings and iterator:
public void setBindingContainer(DCBindingContainer bc) {
this.bindingContainer = bc;
rebuildVO();
The rebuildVO() method looks like the code you provided in your example:
private void rebuildVO() {
DCDataControl dc;
DispatchAppModule dApp;
DCBindingContainer bc;
DCIteratorBinding it;
OperationBinding operationBinding;
ViewObject vo;
DCControlBinding cb;
try {
bc = getBindingContainer();
dc = bc.findDataControl(DATACONTROL);
dApp = (DispatchAppModule)dc.getDataProvider();
// Execute App Module Method to rebuild VO based upon new SQL Statement.
dApp.setDispatchViewSQL();
vo = dApp.findViewObject(DYNAMIC_VIEW_NAME);
it = bc.findIteratorBinding(DYNAMIC_VO_ITER_NAME);
it.bindRowSetIterator(vo, true);
// logger.info("Remove value binding...");
cb = bc.findCtrlBinding(DYNAMIC_VIEW_NAME);
cb.getDCIteratorBinding().removeValueBinding(cb);
bc.removeControlBinding(cb);
// logger.info("Creating new value binding...");
FacesCtrlRangeBinding dynamicRangeBinding =
new FacesCtrlRangeBinding(null,
bc.findIteratorBinding(DYNAMIC_VO_ITER_NAME), null);
// logger.info("Add control binding...");
bc.addControlBinding(DYNAMIC_VIEW_NAME, dynamicRangeBinding);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
And my App Module method that redefines the view object looks like this:
public void setDispatchViewSQL() {
String SQL =
"begin ? := PK_BUsiNESS.F_GETDISPATCHVIEWSQL();end;";
CallableStatement st = null;
String ViewSQL = null;
try {
st = getDBTransaction().createCallableStatement(SQL,
DBTransaction.DEFAULT);
* Register the first bind parameter as our return value of type LONGVARCHAR
st.registerOutParameter(1, OracleTypes.LONGVARCHAR);
st.execute();
ViewSQL = ((OracleCallableStatement) st).getString(1);
findViewObject(DYNAMIC_VO_NAME).remove();
ViewObject vo = createViewObjectFromQueryStmt(DYNAMIC_VO_NAME, ViewSQL);
vo.executeQuery();
} catch (SQLException s) {
throw new JboException(s);
} finally {
try {
st.close();
} catch (SQLException s) {
s.printStackTrace();
When I run it I get my desired results. One thing I don't quite understand is why when the page is first rendered it shows the last set of records rather than the first. Now I have to figure out how to put navigation URLS in each of the table cells.
Thanks for your help; I would not have gotten this far without it,
Jeff

HT2731 I have created my apple ID yesterday and I could not use app store that shows a message that "This Apple ID has not yet been used in the iTunes Store". What should I do?

I have created an Apple ID yesterday and I could not use App store that shows a message when I try to install something that "This Apple ID has not yet been used in the iTunes Store". What should I do?

Try this support article > Using an existing Apple ID with the iTunes Store, Mac App Store, and iBooks Store

Need to create a Store Business document type for material master and store a sharepoint link

Hello,
I need to create a Store business document type for material master and store a URL link . How do I do that?( or is there any functionality to upload a document for a store business document that it will automatically saves to sharepoint?)
Thanks,
Ran.

>
dhayes12 wrote:
> A) When I do the (Material Backflush) MFBF for the 04 type, the Inspection Lot gets created OK. I then can go into QA32 and assign the correct Inspection Plat by clicking the Inspection Lot button.
>
> B) When I do the MIGO via the Purchase Order (type Z01), it will not create the Lot if I have the Multiple Specs selected in the QM Material Master MM02. If, I turn off the Multiple Specs in the QM Material Master and create a new PO and MIGO, it will create the Lot, however, it automatically assigns the lot to the wrong Inspection Plan (2nd Plan see above) I need to be able to select the plan like I can with the 04 type.
>
> Is their some setting that can be changed in Config or somewhere that acts the same way as example A above?
For case A, create insp plan with usage "1- production" If you have one IP with this usage for given material then system will assign Plan to lot automatically. In your case for second plan update usage as 1.
For case B, system should assign 1st plan make sure for both plan udage is correct. for 1st plan usage should be 5 while 2nd plan usage should be 1. Now if your 1st have status 4 and key date before lot date then system will assign plan auto.
Thanks!!!

Can we create entity object based on a text file on the OS?

I understand you can interface with files using webDAV. Can we just create a entity object with source to a text/xml file on the OS instead of a table?

Have a look at the URL data source (under new->business tier->web services) - it allows you to create a data control based on an XML or csv file.
http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=1592
You can also create a data control based on a Java class that interact with a file.

HT2534 Hi, if I create a new iTunes Store etc account to access a European iTunes store, will this wipe all the apps I've downloaded via my UK AppleID (which I'm using across 3 different devices)?

NB. the app I'm initially interested in downloading for is the paid global/worldwide BBC iPlayer app that's only accessible outside the UK, if that helps.
Message was edited by: HayMow

Hi ...
if I create a new iTunes Store etc account to access a European iTunes store, will this wipe all the apps I've downloaded via my UK AppleID (which I'm using across 3 different devices)?
Yes.
And, your credit or debit card credentials must be associated with the same country where you reside.
"Although you can browse the iTunes Store in any country without being signed in, you can only purchase content from the iTunes Store for your own country. This is enforced via the billing address associated with your credit card or other payment method that you use with the iTunes Store, rather than your actual geographic location."
From here > The Complete Guide to Using the iTunes Store | iLounge Article

I connected a friends ipod to my computer without syncing it. Now my apple ID is on their ipod. How do they delete my iD and create their own to be able to facetime and use apple store

I connected a friends ipod to my computer without syncing it. Now my apple ID is on their ipod. How do they delete my iD and create their own to be able to facetime and use apple store?

For Apple store go to Settings>iTunes and App Stores and sign out and sig in with correct ID
For messages go to Settings>FaceTime>You can be reached at and ad an their own unique email address and delete the common Apple ID address.
Similar for Messages too.

My daughter and i own all apple -- we were sharing the same apple id i went and created my own- now i cant access my mail icloud itunes store nothing help me please

i need help
y daughter and i were sharing an apple id
now i have created my own
now i cant access my mail itunes icloud store nothin

All apps are forever tied to the Apple ID that bought them. To stop your id from popping up, you need to delete the apps on his phone, and then repurchase them under his account.

Create an Object(Store) based on Store Id,it should display Store Name

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for