Create table more than 1000 colum

Hello
I have 1500+ column in my select query. how to create table like my query is
create table xyz nologging as
select a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,b1,b2,b3,b4,b5,................a1500
from abcd a,bcde b
where a.a1=b.b1
In oracle 10g I can create only 1000 column in a table.
Please suggest

799301 wrote:
My all columns are formulated with different different tables and want to create one intermediate table
below query is just example
select count(unique((case when sysdate >45 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_45,
count(unique((case when sysdate >105 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_105,
count(unique((case when sysdate >195 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_195,
count(unique((case when sysdate >380 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_380,
count(unique((case when sysdate >45 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_45,
count(unique((case when sysdate >105 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_105,
count(unique((case when sysdate >195 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_195,
count(unique((case when sysdate >380 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_380
from abcd a,bcde b
where a.a1=b.b1;
please suggest how create more than 1000 table columnBy creating a proper relation between the "formulated function" and stored value.
Simplistically put:
Do you model invoices as entities INVOICES_2010, INVOICES_2011 and so on?
Or do you model it as INVOICES that has a year (date) attribute?
It does not make sense to put attribute data into the name of entity. Nor does it make sense to put relationship data into the name of an attribute and create a 1000+ attributes as a result.

Similar Messages

How to create more than 1000 entitie in FDQM

Hi Gurus
1.How to load locations to FDQM without manual Entry?
Can we load locations by using flat files?
Requirement: I have to create more than 1000 entities in FDM Application for mapping Target in HFM Application.
How to achieve this?
regards
Dev

Two things :
#1 - The tables you need to add data to are : tPOVPartition, tStructPartitionHierarchy, tStructPartitionLinks. The first table is the basic location information. The last two tables define the relationship hierarchy of where the locations belong. I would expect that if the Strcut information is missing, FDM will not be able to place it anywhere on the locations screen.
Additionally, for the tPOVPartition, there is required information and you need to make sure you are including all of that info when you create your record.
#2 - If you are handy at coding, I'm positive there is an API call to create a location. It would make more sense perhaps to write a script that uses the APIs to create the locations so that you can be sure that it is being done right.

Save More than 1000 chars in a field of (Z) Database Table?

Hi Friends,
I created a database table with few fields. In the table, one field is REMARKS which should save more than 1000 characters for every record. For that field, I created domain & data element of char with 2000 length. But system gives an error representing that "Should not be more than 255 chars ".
Even, select statement is also retrieving 132 chars only, if remarks are less than 255 and greater than 150 chars.
Could you please provide me solution?
Thanks
Sarayu

Hi,
The Most simple solution for it can be that Divide the field REMARKS of size 1000 in multiples of 200 characters like REMARK1, REMARK2....REMARKn.
Now you can create two FMs :
zset_data: To Store 1000 char long data in Table
Here you will divide the data of Variable (type char1024) in multiples of 200 and will store in REMARK1, REMARK2.....
zget_data: To Get 1000 char long data back from Table
Here you will concatenate REMARK1, REMARK2..... and will store in Variable of Type char1024.
This is the best solution if Table is not going to be maintained by Table Maintenance Generator.
Thanks
Ajay

Tables containing contractors who provide services more than 1000 FC

Can anyone will tell me which tables I have to use to create this report................
Report to identify the contractors who provide services to the company for a amount more than 1000 FC during the 2000 year.

Hi,
You need to work out how to identify a Contractor.
Your contractors need to be setup as Suppliers in Oracle, Suppliers have Classifications (Type) and perhaps your Payables team always use a specific Supplier Type for contractors ... or maybe not!
If they use a Supplier Type to identify contractors then your query might be something like the following (assuming you don't want to consider tax/freight/etc.):
set pages 9999
col vendor_name format a50
select pv.vendor_name, pv.vendor_id, sum(aid.amount)
from ap_invoices_all ai
, ap_invoice_distributions_all aid
, po_vendors pv
where ai.invoice_id = aid.invoice_id
and ai.vendor_id = pv.vendor_id
and pv.vendor_type_lookup_code = '&Contractor'
and aid.accounting_date >= to_date('01-JAN-2003','DD-MON-YYYY')
and aid.accounting_date < to_date('01-JAN-2004','DD-MON-YYYY')
and aid.line_type_lookup_code = 'ITEM'
group by pv.vendor_name, pv.vendor_id
having sum(aid.amount) > 1000;
Running this in Vision Demo 11.5.10.2 with vendor_type_lookup_code = "Contractor" gets:
VENDOR_NAME VENDOR_ID SUM(AID.AMOUNT)
Next Generation Graphix (DBA, Art Wilde) 12 1447238.5
Gareth
Blog: http://garethroberts.blogspot.com

Trouble with the SQL smt to :list tables having more than 1000 rows

Please I trying to list only tables having more than 1000 rows, but the sql stmt below doesn't work, can someone gives me a tips
select table_name from user_tables where table_name in ( select table_name from user_tables where rownum > 1000 ) : The result is no rows!
But I know that I have at lest 50 tables having more than 1000 rows
Thanks a lot for the help

If your tables are reasonably analyzed, then you can simply query:
SELECT table_name,
num_rows
FROM user_tables
WHERE num_rows >= 1000This will give you quite a reasonable estimate.
Otherwise you have to go for dynamic sql or use the data dictionary to help you generate suitable scripts ....

How to find tables which has more than 1000 Partitions

Hi All,
Is there any other way to find out the tables which has more than 1000 Partitions ?
Apart from SAP report RSDD_MSSQL_CUBEANALYZE. Because this report is not working for me as job getting cancel again and again with ABAP dump DBIF_DSQL2_SQL.I already check SAP Note 1309838, but itu2019s not applicable for us because we are on highest support package level SAP_BW 701 SP06.
Thanks,
Harshal

If you are running SQL Server as your database platform run this query:
select o.object_id,o.name,p.Partition_count from sys.objects o
inner join
(select object_id,count(distinct partition_number) as Partition_count
from sys.partitions
group by object_id)
p
on o.object_id = p.object_id
where o.type = 'U'
order by p.Partition_count desc

Error Creating Invoices with more than 1000 positions

Hello.
I am creating invoices in SD module with VF01 transaction. When the document has more than 1000 positions an error is displayed.
The text of the error is:
Memory area p.status GUI SAPMV60A SM is too small.
área memoria p.status GUI SAPMV60A SM demasiado pequeña.
I would like to know if there is any way to correct this error. If it happens because memory is too small, how could it be increased?
Thank you.
Diana Carolina.

Hi Diana
As far as I know, standard SAP has restricted the no. of line items in an accounting document to 999.
So, this is in turn impacts the no. of line items you can have on a Sales invoice,
Since every invoice line item can have atleast 2 accounting entries, the max. no. of invoice line items you can have is 499.
I dont think there is no work around for this
Rgds

Cant we create a custom PA infotype whose size is more than 1000 chars?

can we create a custom PA infotype whose size is more than 1000 characters
i have tried this way i have given 4 fields in PM01 transaction with the data element 255 so the total size is 1020 it is throwing an error. pls help......

Hi,
as described in the following documentaion the length of the data could be 1500 bytes.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/4f/d526be575e11d189270000e8322f96/content.htm
Regards
Bernd

List with more than 1000 elements

I'm trying to use this query:
select *
from street
where street_cod in ('street_code_list')
It working well when the 'street_code_list' has less than 1000 codes but it fails when it have more, with a message that says that a list can't have more than 1000 elements. How can I fix this problem? Can I use any other kind of object to store my list?
I'm querying the database in ColdFusion using ODBC.
Thank you in advance,
Rui

Another thing to consider doing is simply creating a "list table" which would contain your list elements and allow you to do a
SELECT X
FROM Y
WHERE X IN (SELECT X
FROM Z)
type query.
I don't know where you are getting your list from, but if it is persistant (i.e, doesn't change with every program run) this is certainly a viable option (and may be usable even if the list does change every run).
If this is being executed in PL/SQL (or some other procedural language) you could also just loop through your list: execute the query with the first 1000 list elements and do your processing, then the next, and so on. Of course, to some extent this depends on your processing, but if you need the entire result set before you can process it, then you could store the individual result sets in a PL/SQL table or an array (if you are using Pro*C or whatever) and then process when the PL/SQL table/array was fully populated.

How to pass more than 1000 entries in 'IN' clause, Oracle 11g

Hi All,
I know this is a very common question in Oracle discussion forum. But, Im in different zone.
I use C#, .NET and Oracle 11g. I have a situation where I will create a query statement using 'IN' clause in C# code based on my requirement and execute that statement from code itself with oracle connection object. I do not have any procedures. I must phrase my query statement and pass it on to OracleConnection object to execute it.
My code looks like this....
List<decimal> x_Ids = new List<decimal>();
I will load my IDs into x_Ids here;
string whereInClause = ........I will prepare a 'IN' clause (All IDs separated by ',')
My query would looks like this....
string query = select * from MYTABLE where X_ID in [ whereInClause with more than 1000 entries]
oraConn.ExecuteQuery(query);
I have a workaround with OR operator with 'IN' clause like below.
X_ID in [ Ids till 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] ....so on.....
It is working, but, I heard that this may slowdown the performance of the application. Is this really a performance hit to my application?
Can you please suggest any other workaround to overcome this situation?

>
I have a workaround with OR operator with 'IN' clause like below.
X_ID in [ Ids till 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] ....so on.....
It is working, but, I heard that this may slowdown the performance of the application. Is this really a performance hit to my application?There should be no performance difference between a statement like
select * from myTab
where ID in (1,2,3,4,5)
OR ID in (6,7,8,10,12) and
select * from myTab
where ID in (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,12) The execution plan should be identical.
However those values might better be send as a single object (collection or table of numbers type).
I think the ODP or OO4O connectivity allows to create and such oracle object types.
Another way could be to think about how all the values are created? Did any user enter them manually? Certainly not. Then maybe you can apply the same logic to the SQL statement that created those values in your .Net application.
something like
select * from myTab
where ID in (select t2.FK_ID from otherTab t2 where t2.Col1 = 100) This approach would probably beat all others performancewise. Since you avoid the overhead of constructing the in-lists.

INDIRECT for more than 1000 Rows

Here's a puzzler!
Why does this not work for values at G6579 of more than 1000, i.e., for Cells below C1000.
=IF(G6579<=0,CHAR(32),INDIRECT("C"&G6579))
It works fine for all the rows above 6579 which find rows above C1000. The Cells in column C have values, but at Row 6579 and below, this formula generates "This formula contains an invalid reference".
Have I hit a limit on allowable INDIRECT argument values?
Dick

Dick Huitema wrote:
YVAN:
May you explain why you use CHAR(32) to define a string of one space ?
DICK:
I want the cell left blank; if there's a better way, I'm all ears. I might then be able to use the test you recommended (using LEN)... although I haven't needed one so far.
Further thoughts?
BARRY:
Previous thoughts, actually. Yvan, as he mentioned, had suggested using the empty string ( "" ) >instead of a space.
=IF(G6579<=0,"",INDIRECT("C"&1000))
Must have had your earplugs in at the time. ;-)</div>
Yup! And the sleep mask must have been on, too!
Sorry Yvan... I didn't quite understand what "empty string" meant and thought you were trying to suggest using LEN... which made no sense, of course.
An empty string is a string which contains nothing, the one defined by ""
=CHAR(32) defines a string of one space character, the one which is often created using =" "
In many tables, we need to take care of empty cells.
The true definition of an empty cell is a cell which contains nothind.
This status may be checked thanks to the function ISBLANK(theCell).
Alas, as there is no function allowing us to define the value of a cell to nothing (I'm desparately waiting for the function BLANK()) we have to use the canada dry blank cell.
My own choice is to set the content of the cell to the empty string ("") . You used the space (" ").
I described the way o check if a cell if "blank in the extended fashion"
LEN(of a true empty cell) is zero, because the length of nothing is nil.
LEN(of a cell containing "") is zero, because it's the definition of the empty string.
So, the single instruction LEN(theCell) give us the wanted informatioN
If you use the space string, the test is more complex. The one which I sdescribed was wrong because it didn't treated the case of a table using both empty strings and space strings.
It would be
=IF(OR(LEN(theCell)=0,theCell=" "),theCellIisEmpty,theCellIsNotEmpty)
Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) lundi 12 juillet 2010 19:15:08

Update the authorization object value for more than 1000 role

I need to remove one of the activity value (06) from authorization object S_SCD0.
I do a search and found out that there are more than 1000 roles which having the activity value = 06 for authorization object S_SCD0.
However, I don't think I can create a SCAT script to update all these 1000 roles and I believe its going to be a very tedious if I am going to manually change it one-by-one. Hence, I am wondering is there any standard program/function which I can use to automate the above changes for all these 1000 over roles.
Kindly advise.
Thanks

Direct update the table is the easiest way, but should be discourage for the obvious reason.
Should take a step back, take a long term view, when you need to update 1000 roles, maybe a role redesign might be needed. For example, if you can change the role model to derive role model, once update to the parent role will take care of all the child role.
Thanks,
Lye

Difference of the results more than 1000

I have to write a procedure where if the results of the following result set varies by more than 1000 than it should sent out a paramter YES
COUNT(1)     TABLE_NM
42986     A_TBL
539     B_TBL
42986     C_TBL
42986     AD_TBL
so if the difference between the counts of any tables is more than 1000 then it should send YES.
can someone suggest?

SQL> create table tbl
2    as
3      select 42986 cnt,'A_TBL' table_nm from dual union all
4      select 539,'B_TBL' from dual union all
5      select 42986,'C_TBL' from dual union all
6      select 42986,'D_TBL' from dual
7 /
Table created.
SQL> select case count(*)
2            when 0 then 'NO'
3            else 'YES'
4          end result
5    from tbl t1,
6          tbl t2
7    where t2.cnt - t1.cnt > 1000
8      and rownum = 1
9 /
RES
YES
SQL> drop table tbl
2 /
Table dropped.
SQL> create table tbl
2    as
3      select 42986 cnt,'A_TBL' table_nm from dual union all
4      select 42980,'B_TBL' from dual union all
5      select 42950,'C_TBL' from dual union all
6      select 42970,'D_TBL' from dual
7 /
Table created.
SQL> select case count(*)
2            when 0 then 'NO'
3            else 'YES'
4          end result
5    from tbl t1,
6          tbl t2
7    where t2.cnt - t1.cnt > 1000
8      and rownum = 1
9 /
RES
NO
SQL> SY.

Can columns be more than 1000 in a select query (oracle 11 g)

I am getting this error: "ORA-01792: maximum number of columns in a table or view is 1000"
I have a dynamic query where number of column can increase according to the user input.
They can expect more than 1000 columns. Is it possible to fetch more than 1000 rows in a query?
I appreciate all your help.
Edited by: user10232912 on Apr 26, 2012 2:07 AM

>
They can expect more than 1000 columns.
Then they are idiots. IMO.
Open challenge. Show me an entity with a 1000 attributes and I will show you a flawed data
model and a total lack of grasping fundamentals of implementing that into a relation database product like Oracle.I second that - as someone who once had to ETL a system which had a table with 35.000 fields - that's 35K.
It was a system which made extensive use of arrays - and arrays of arrays of arrays...
Paul...

ORA-24335 - cannot support more than 1000 columns - How to solve this?

Hi,
I got error message 'ORA-24335 - cannot support more than 1000 columns ' when i try to insert x no of rows for a table with following code:
INSERT ALL
INTO tableA Values ('A', 'B', 'C', 1, 2, 3)
INTO tableA Values ('D', 'E', 'F', 4, 5, 6)
INTO tableA Values ('G', 'H', 'I', 7, 8, 9)
SELECT *
FROM DUAL
How to solve above?
What does it really mean? It's not as easy as if my table has 10 columns than I can't insert more than 100 rows (1000 columns divided with 10 columns = maximun 100 rows to insert), or?
Is there a better/more appropriate way to do insert many rows?
Should I do my inserts with an OracleTransaction (My application is developed with C# and asp.net), as ~follows
BEGIN
INSERT INTO tableA Values ('A', 'B', 'C', 1, 2, 3)
INSERT INTO tableA Values ('D', 'E', 'F', 4, 5, 6)
INSERT INTO tableA Values ('G', 'H', 'I', 7, 8, 9)
COMMIT
END
Thx in advance!
Edited by: user8819407 on 2010-mar-07 15:40

Hi,
So how did you solve the problem? Can you please give an example?
I have the same problem inserting over 1000 values into my Oracle DB. The table only has 51 columns but to speed up the insert command, I use bulk inserts via insert all command. I need to insert 100 rows at a time for a total of 5100 values.
Example:
SQLCmd = INSERT ALL INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
SELECT 1 FROM DUAL
SQLVals = 1 22C38299 80700334 04-19-2012 13:55:33 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC93000 04/19/2012 13:55:42 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 12 4 0.792191 23 1 0.00 -113.50 13.48 9 1 9
1 36PR7038 8070EDC2 04-19-2012 12:24:35 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC60360 04/19/2012 12:24:41 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 7 4 0.757501 3 2 13.88 -114.80 14.06 5 1 6
1 42C63512 8050166F 04-19-2012 16:02:50 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC52420 04/19/2012 16:02:57 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 10 4 0.778471 8 1 0.00 -122.30 13.05 8 1 7
1 33MR3076 80803E75 04-19-2012 13:13:16 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC60330 04/19/2012 13:13:22 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 13 5 0.636721 28 3 0.00 -122.19 0.70 8 1 6
Then I call: &DBInsert($sqlCmd, @sqlVals);
This is the error I get: ORA-24335: cannot support more than 1000 columns.
I need to insert about 879,500 rows (51 cols per row). The values I read from a text file in sets of about 48,000 and put them into a hash. I tried inserting one row at a time, but it takes too long, about 28 hrs! Then, I tried the bulk update with only 6 rows and the total time was about 25 minutes. Which is acceptable to us.
Thanks!

Create table more than 1000 colum

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for