Tables containing contractors who provide services more than 1000 FC

Can anyone will tell me which tables I have to use to create this report................
Report to identify the contractors who provide services to the company for a amount more than 1000 FC during the 2000 year.

Hi,
You need to work out how to identify a Contractor.
Your contractors need to be setup as Suppliers in Oracle, Suppliers have Classifications (Type) and perhaps your Payables team always use a specific Supplier Type for contractors ... or maybe not!
If they use a Supplier Type to identify contractors then your query might be something like the following (assuming you don't want to consider tax/freight/etc.):
set pages 9999
col vendor_name format a50
select pv.vendor_name, pv.vendor_id, sum(aid.amount)
from ap_invoices_all ai
, ap_invoice_distributions_all aid
, po_vendors pv
where ai.invoice_id = aid.invoice_id
and ai.vendor_id = pv.vendor_id
and pv.vendor_type_lookup_code = '&Contractor'
and aid.accounting_date >= to_date('01-JAN-2003','DD-MON-YYYY')
and aid.accounting_date < to_date('01-JAN-2004','DD-MON-YYYY')
and aid.line_type_lookup_code = 'ITEM'
group by pv.vendor_name, pv.vendor_id
having sum(aid.amount) > 1000;
Running this in Vision Demo 11.5.10.2 with vendor_type_lookup_code = "Contractor" gets:
VENDOR_NAME VENDOR_ID SUM(AID.AMOUNT)
Next Generation Graphix (DBA, Art Wilde) 12 1447238.5
Gareth
Blog: http://garethroberts.blogspot.com

Similar Messages

Report to identify the contractors who provide services to company for

Hi,
I have to generate following report
Report to identify the contractors who provide services to the company for a amount more than 1000 FC during the year 2003.
but I m not getting the contractor details, amount, in which tables it is stored?
Can any one tell me please...
Thanks

Hi,
You need to work out how to identify a Contractor.
Your contractors need to be setup as Suppliers in Oracle, Suppliers have Classifications (Type) and perhaps your Payables team always use a specific Supplier Type for contractors ... or maybe not!
If they use a Supplier Type to identify contractors then your query might be something like the following (assuming you don't want to consider tax/freight/etc.):
set pages 9999
col vendor_name format a50
select pv.vendor_name, pv.vendor_id, sum(aid.amount)
from ap_invoices_all ai
, ap_invoice_distributions_all aid
, po_vendors pv
where ai.invoice_id = aid.invoice_id
and ai.vendor_id = pv.vendor_id
and pv.vendor_type_lookup_code = '&Contractor'
and aid.accounting_date >= to_date('01-JAN-2003','DD-MON-YYYY')
and aid.accounting_date < to_date('01-JAN-2004','DD-MON-YYYY')
and aid.line_type_lookup_code = 'ITEM'
group by pv.vendor_name, pv.vendor_id
having sum(aid.amount) > 1000;
Running this in Vision Demo 11.5.10.2 with vendor_type_lookup_code = "Contractor" gets:
VENDOR_NAME VENDOR_ID SUM(AID.AMOUNT)
Next Generation Graphix (DBA, Art Wilde) 12 1447238.5
Gareth
Blog: http://garethroberts.blogspot.com

Save More than 1000 chars in a field of (Z) Database Table?

Hi Friends,
I created a database table with few fields. In the table, one field is REMARKS which should save more than 1000 characters for every record. For that field, I created domain & data element of char with 2000 length. But system gives an error representing that "Should not be more than 255 chars ".
Even, select statement is also retrieving 132 chars only, if remarks are less than 255 and greater than 150 chars.
Could you please provide me solution?
Thanks
Sarayu

Hi,
The Most simple solution for it can be that Divide the field REMARKS of size 1000 in multiples of 200 characters like REMARK1, REMARK2....REMARKn.
Now you can create two FMs :
zset_data: To Store 1000 char long data in Table
Here you will divide the data of Variable (type char1024) in multiples of 200 and will store in REMARK1, REMARK2.....
zget_data: To Get 1000 char long data back from Table
Here you will concatenate REMARK1, REMARK2..... and will store in Variable of Type char1024.
This is the best solution if Table is not going to be maintained by Table Maintenance Generator.
Thanks
Ajay

Create table more than 1000 colum

Hello
I have 1500+ column in my select query. how to create table like my query is
create table xyz nologging as
select a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,b1,b2,b3,b4,b5,................a1500
from abcd a,bcde b
where a.a1=b.b1
In oracle 10g I can create only 1000 column in a table.
Please suggest

799301 wrote:
My all columns are formulated with different different tables and want to create one intermediate table
below query is just example
select count(unique((case when sysdate >45 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_45,
count(unique((case when sysdate >105 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_105,
count(unique((case when sysdate >195 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_195,
count(unique((case when sysdate >380 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_380,
count(unique((case when sysdate >45 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_45,
count(unique((case when sysdate >105 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_105,
count(unique((case when sysdate >195 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_195,
count(unique((case when sysdate >380 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_380
from abcd a,bcde b
where a.a1=b.b1;
please suggest how create more than 1000 table columnBy creating a proper relation between the "formulated function" and stored value.
Simplistically put:
Do you model invoices as entities INVOICES_2010, INVOICES_2011 and so on?
Or do you model it as INVOICES that has a year (date) attribute?
It does not make sense to put attribute data into the name of entity. Nor does it make sense to put relationship data into the name of an attribute and create a 1000+ attributes as a result.

Trouble with the SQL smt to :list tables having more than 1000 rows

Please I trying to list only tables having more than 1000 rows, but the sql stmt below doesn't work, can someone gives me a tips
select table_name from user_tables where table_name in ( select table_name from user_tables where rownum > 1000 ) : The result is no rows!
But I know that I have at lest 50 tables having more than 1000 rows
Thanks a lot for the help

If your tables are reasonably analyzed, then you can simply query:
SELECT table_name,
num_rows
FROM user_tables
WHERE num_rows >= 1000This will give you quite a reasonable estimate.
Otherwise you have to go for dynamic sql or use the data dictionary to help you generate suitable scripts ....

How to find tables which has more than 1000 Partitions

Hi All,
Is there any other way to find out the tables which has more than 1000 Partitions ?
Apart from SAP report RSDD_MSSQL_CUBEANALYZE. Because this report is not working for me as job getting cancel again and again with ABAP dump DBIF_DSQL2_SQL.I already check SAP Note 1309838, but itu2019s not applicable for us because we are on highest support package level SAP_BW 701 SP06.
Thanks,
Harshal

If you are running SQL Server as your database platform run this query:
select o.object_id,o.name,p.Partition_count from sys.objects o
inner join
(select object_id,count(distinct partition_number) as Partition_count
from sys.partitions
group by object_id)
p
on o.object_id = p.object_id
where o.type = 'U'
order by p.Partition_count desc

IN operator with more than 1000 values

Hi,
For a given list of IDs (PKs), I need to fetch the corresponding rows.
The problem is that I have more than 1000 values and as far as I know that IN operator is limited to 1000
values.
I thought about using UNION such that each Select contains up to 1000 IDs.
example":
select * from temp where id in(1....1000)
union all
select * from temp where id in(1001....2000)
Is there a better way to do that?
Thanks
dyahav

As others have presented technical solutions, i'll present you a logical one (seemingly logical anyways, but it will depend on your application).
I have seen some applications where you get
select * from some_table where ... <conditions>;That result set is returned to the front end and presented to the users who then pick a series of records and submit another request to the database which ends up being...
--note, this could be a many table join, with lots more information that just the some_table, this is illustrative only
select * from some_table where pk_value in (super_super_duper_list_based_on_last_result_set);If this mimics what you have in your application, i'd recommend just fixing it so the users can select a reasonable set of data, OR the entire set (in the last case you'd just send the <conditions> instead of a massive list of PK values).
Again, highly speculative but i thought i'd mention it in the off chance it's useful to you.

Can columns be more than 1000 in a select query (oracle 11 g)

I am getting this error: "ORA-01792: maximum number of columns in a table or view is 1000"
I have a dynamic query where number of column can increase according to the user input.
They can expect more than 1000 columns. Is it possible to fetch more than 1000 rows in a query?
I appreciate all your help.
Edited by: user10232912 on Apr 26, 2012 2:07 AM

>
They can expect more than 1000 columns.
Then they are idiots. IMO.
Open challenge. Show me an entity with a 1000 attributes and I will show you a flawed data
model and a total lack of grasping fundamentals of implementing that into a relation database product like Oracle.I second that - as someone who once had to ETL a system which had a table with 35.000 fields - that's 35K.
It was a system which made extensive use of arrays - and arrays of arrays of arrays...
Paul...

How can i get more than 1000 items in Custom List Displaying Items?

http://.....sites/_vti_bin/listdata.svc/AddressBook(List) allows 1000 items Only my AddressBook List, but i have more than 1000 items in my AddressBook list. I want to get items
from AddressBook list and bind in another place using Autocomplete method like this.
=======>>>>listurl=http://.....sites/_vti_bin/listdata.svc/AddressBook.
and my coding in camel like below
protected void btnpopulatedetails_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
SPSite objSite = SPContext.Current.Site;
SPWeb objWeb = objSite.OpenWeb();
objWeb.AllowUnsafeUpdates = true;
SPList list = objWeb.Lists["Address Book"];
SPQuery query = new SPQuery();
query.QueryThrottleMode = SPQueryThrottleOption.Override;
query.Query = "<Where><Eq><FieldRef Name='Title'/><Value Type='Text'>" + txtcustomer.Value + "</Value></Eq></Where>";
query.RowLimit = 500;
SPListItemCollection items = list.GetItems(query);
function fnCustomerSearchBind() {
if ($("input[id$='txtcustomer']").length != 0) {
var collcustomer = searchCustomers('', urlTo, fieldto);
$("input[id$='txtcustomer']").autocomplete({
source: collcustomer,
//maxLength:10,
select: function (event, ui) {
//debugger;
event.preventDefault();
$("input[id$='txtcustomer']").val(ui.item.value);
$("input[id$='btnpopulatedetails']").click();
return false;
minLength: 0,
function searchCustomers(value, listurl, fieldto) {
var collcus = new Array();
var custresults;
var url =listurl + "?$filter=startswith('" + fieldto + "','" + value + "')";
//debugger;
$.ajax({
cache: true,
type: "GET",
async:false,
dataType: "json",
url: url,
success: function (data) {
custresults = data.d.results;
//alert(listurl);
// alert(data.d.results);
for (var x = 0; x < custresults.length; x++) {
//alert(custresults[x]['To']);
collcustList.push(custresults[x]['To']);
//debugger;
//debugger;
return collcustList;
In my research listurl=http://.....sites/_vti_bin/listdata.svc/AddressBook has 1000 items in 1st Page by default, So how to change 1st Page by default to All Pages through
code. I think you understand my environment by look above coding, if you don't I am using office 365 sandbox solution. One more thing i know through my research Pages can be change by using Ado.Net Data Service, i tried this one but this one support windows
server 2008 r2 only but i am using Windows Server 2012 r2. Please help me if you know the answer.

Hi,
Here is a blog would be helpful:
ADO.NET Data Services returns 1000 items
https://gilleslauwers.wordpress.com/2010/12/08/ado-net-data-services-returns-1000-items/
Best Regards,
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

List with more than 1000 elements

I'm trying to use this query:
select *
from street
where street_cod in ('street_code_list')
It working well when the 'street_code_list' has less than 1000 codes but it fails when it have more, with a message that says that a list can't have more than 1000 elements. How can I fix this problem? Can I use any other kind of object to store my list?
I'm querying the database in ColdFusion using ODBC.
Thank you in advance,
Rui

Another thing to consider doing is simply creating a "list table" which would contain your list elements and allow you to do a
SELECT X
FROM Y
WHERE X IN (SELECT X
FROM Z)
type query.
I don't know where you are getting your list from, but if it is persistant (i.e, doesn't change with every program run) this is certainly a viable option (and may be usable even if the list does change every run).
If this is being executed in PL/SQL (or some other procedural language) you could also just loop through your list: execute the query with the first 1000 list elements and do your processing, then the next, and so on. Of course, to some extent this depends on your processing, but if you need the entire result set before you can process it, then you could store the individual result sets in a PL/SQL table or an array (if you are using Pro*C or whatever) and then process when the PL/SQL table/array was fully populated.

More than 1000 Line items

Hi
User has done the billing for 1300 line items by using transaction code VF01. After completing that process there is a option TO release Accounting, when user select on that button system throwing an error "Maximum number of items in FI
reached".
We know that from FI side system will not allow more than 999 line items. Since we are using 4.7 version.
Invoice have already send to the customer. So, How to solve this issue.
Please provide me the solution as early as possible.
Your help would really appreciated.
Regards,
Schilukuri

Hi to everyone,
My issue has been resolved.
My requirement is User has done billing (VF01) for more than 1000 line items. After that he was doing that billing document to release to accounting. That time system was throwing an error message." Maximum number of items in FI
reached"
Solution:
Use Transaction OBCY and give work area VBRK and there you have to give Table name BSEG and give Field name whichever the fields you want to give to group the same line items.(Document may have some same line items).
refer SAP Note:36353.
Regards,
Schilukuri

INDIRECT for more than 1000 Rows

Here's a puzzler!
Why does this not work for values at G6579 of more than 1000, i.e., for Cells below C1000.
=IF(G6579<=0,CHAR(32),INDIRECT("C"&G6579))
It works fine for all the rows above 6579 which find rows above C1000. The Cells in column C have values, but at Row 6579 and below, this formula generates "This formula contains an invalid reference".
Have I hit a limit on allowable INDIRECT argument values?
Dick

Dick Huitema wrote:
YVAN:
May you explain why you use CHAR(32) to define a string of one space ?
DICK:
I want the cell left blank; if there's a better way, I'm all ears. I might then be able to use the test you recommended (using LEN)... although I haven't needed one so far.
Further thoughts?
BARRY:
Previous thoughts, actually. Yvan, as he mentioned, had suggested using the empty string ( "" ) >instead of a space.
=IF(G6579<=0,"",INDIRECT("C"&1000))
Must have had your earplugs in at the time. ;-)</div>
Yup! And the sleep mask must have been on, too!
Sorry Yvan... I didn't quite understand what "empty string" meant and thought you were trying to suggest using LEN... which made no sense, of course.
An empty string is a string which contains nothing, the one defined by ""
=CHAR(32) defines a string of one space character, the one which is often created using =" "
In many tables, we need to take care of empty cells.
The true definition of an empty cell is a cell which contains nothind.
This status may be checked thanks to the function ISBLANK(theCell).
Alas, as there is no function allowing us to define the value of a cell to nothing (I'm desparately waiting for the function BLANK()) we have to use the canada dry blank cell.
My own choice is to set the content of the cell to the empty string ("") . You used the space (" ").
I described the way o check if a cell if "blank in the extended fashion"
LEN(of a true empty cell) is zero, because the length of nothing is nil.
LEN(of a cell containing "") is zero, because it's the definition of the empty string.
So, the single instruction LEN(theCell) give us the wanted informatioN
If you use the space string, the test is more complex. The one which I sdescribed was wrong because it didn't treated the case of a table using both empty strings and space strings.
It would be
=IF(OR(LEN(theCell)=0,theCell=" "),theCellIisEmpty,theCellIsNotEmpty)
Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) lundi 12 juillet 2010 19:15:08

Error occurs when executing an item in an inbox with more than 1000 entries

Hi Everyone,
One of our approvers in SRM experienced an error when his inbox contained more than 1000 entries . Further execution on any inbox item produces errors.
Would you know where to set the maximum allowable entries in a user's inbox? Can this be set thru SRM config or Basis functionality?
We also searched for existing SAP Notes but found nothing.
Your inputs and help are greatly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Vhong

Hello,
The user has sent me the screen shot. But this has no error messages. The approval transaction shows an ITS screen/code with template 'bbpapproval/99/saplbw02_1200.html'
However, we have a user in Quality where the page displays with no problem and with 1675 Entries.
Do you think this is more of an ITS setting or any Template/JavaScript issues?
I got this code (view source code) earlier today and the topmost header of the code is:

Regarding the not-so-good practice of approvers to have more than 1000 entries in their inbox, we are still in the process of planning on how to divide the task to different approvers since there is only one approver (Project Manager) for the related network.
Thanks and Redards,
Vhong

ORA-24335 - cannot support more than 1000 columns - How to solve this?

Hi,
I got error message 'ORA-24335 - cannot support more than 1000 columns ' when i try to insert x no of rows for a table with following code:
INSERT ALL
INTO tableA Values ('A', 'B', 'C', 1, 2, 3)
INTO tableA Values ('D', 'E', 'F', 4, 5, 6)
INTO tableA Values ('G', 'H', 'I', 7, 8, 9)
SELECT *
FROM DUAL
How to solve above?
What does it really mean? It's not as easy as if my table has 10 columns than I can't insert more than 100 rows (1000 columns divided with 10 columns = maximun 100 rows to insert), or?
Is there a better/more appropriate way to do insert many rows?
Should I do my inserts with an OracleTransaction (My application is developed with C# and asp.net), as ~follows
BEGIN
INSERT INTO tableA Values ('A', 'B', 'C', 1, 2, 3)
INSERT INTO tableA Values ('D', 'E', 'F', 4, 5, 6)
INSERT INTO tableA Values ('G', 'H', 'I', 7, 8, 9)
COMMIT
END
Thx in advance!
Edited by: user8819407 on 2010-mar-07 15:40

Hi,
So how did you solve the problem? Can you please give an example?
I have the same problem inserting over 1000 values into my Oracle DB. The table only has 51 columns but to speed up the insert command, I use bulk inserts via insert all command. I need to insert 100 rows at a time for a total of 5100 values.
Example:
SQLCmd = INSERT ALL INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
SELECT 1 FROM DUAL
SQLVals = 1 22C38299 80700334 04-19-2012 13:55:33 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC93000 04/19/2012 13:55:42 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 12 4 0.792191 23 1 0.00 -113.50 13.48 9 1 9
1 36PR7038 8070EDC2 04-19-2012 12:24:35 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC60360 04/19/2012 12:24:41 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 7 4 0.757501 3 2 13.88 -114.80 14.06 5 1 6
1 42C63512 8050166F 04-19-2012 16:02:50 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC52420 04/19/2012 16:02:57 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 10 4 0.778471 8 1 0.00 -122.30 13.05 8 1 7
1 33MR3076 80803E75 04-19-2012 13:13:16 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC60330 04/19/2012 13:13:22 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 13 5 0.636721 28 3 0.00 -122.19 0.70 8 1 6
Then I call: &DBInsert($sqlCmd, @sqlVals);
This is the error I get: ORA-24335: cannot support more than 1000 columns.
I need to insert about 879,500 rows (51 cols per row). The values I read from a text file in sets of about 48,000 and put them into a hash. I tried inserting one row at a time, but it takes too long, about 28 hrs! Then, I tried the bulk update with only 6 rows and the total time was about 25 minutes. Which is acceptable to us.
Thanks!

How to pass more than 1000 entries in 'IN' clause, Oracle 11g

Hi All,
I know this is a very common question in Oracle discussion forum. But, Im in different zone.
I use C#, .NET and Oracle 11g. I have a situation where I will create a query statement using 'IN' clause in C# code based on my requirement and execute that statement from code itself with oracle connection object. I do not have any procedures. I must phrase my query statement and pass it on to OracleConnection object to execute it.
My code looks like this....
List<decimal> x_Ids = new List<decimal>();
I will load my IDs into x_Ids here;
string whereInClause = ........I will prepare a 'IN' clause (All IDs separated by ',')
My query would looks like this....
string query = select * from MYTABLE where X_ID in [ whereInClause with more than 1000 entries]
oraConn.ExecuteQuery(query);
I have a workaround with OR operator with 'IN' clause like below.
X_ID in [ Ids till 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] ....so on.....
It is working, but, I heard that this may slowdown the performance of the application. Is this really a performance hit to my application?
Can you please suggest any other workaround to overcome this situation?

>
I have a workaround with OR operator with 'IN' clause like below.
X_ID in [ Ids till 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] ....so on.....
It is working, but, I heard that this may slowdown the performance of the application. Is this really a performance hit to my application?There should be no performance difference between a statement like
select * from myTab
where ID in (1,2,3,4,5)
OR ID in (6,7,8,10,12) and
select * from myTab
where ID in (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,12) The execution plan should be identical.
However those values might better be send as a single object (collection or table of numbers type).
I think the ODP or OO4O connectivity allows to create and such oracle object types.
Another way could be to think about how all the values are created? Did any user enter them manually? Certainly not. Then maybe you can apply the same logic to the SQL statement that created those values in your .Net application.
something like
select * from myTab
where ID in (select t2.FK_ID from otherTab t2 where t2.Col1 = 100) This approach would probably beat all others performancewise. Since you avoid the overhead of constructing the in-lists.

Tables containing contractors who provide services more than 1000 FC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for