Cred.lim.used field in FD32 not getting updated

hi All,
I have a scenario where my Cred.lim.used field which is a %age value is not getting updated in fd32
when I go to fd33 for a customer my Credit limit is 1,000,000.00
and Credit exposure is 1,138.28- but the %age is 0.00 %.
any suggestions
thanks,

Hi
Think logically how it will show the credit limit used in percentage just calculate
credit limit used*100/ total credit limit
1,138.28*100
1,000,000.00
will come to 0.11 % so system wont show it will consider only if it is more than 1%
regards

Similar Messages

Field TSABR is not getting updated in MHIS table.

Hi All,
The field TSABR (Scheduling Status: New Start Called) is not getting updated in MHIS table.
Please do tell me how it will get updated.
What is a logic behind it.
Many Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sanjay Tiwari

Hi,
I checked it my system and that field was getting updated ..
For calls with status "New start called " will get updated in MHIS and for these call you will only have the field scheduling status :planned date called " as marked . pls check
regrds
pushpa

Price for I/C (Cost) field in VF03 not getting updated for an Invoice

hi,
the amount field (KBETR) for condition type ZR04 in VR03, for a specific invoice generated, is coming out to be 0.00 USD.
as a result, the condition value is also coming out to be 0.00 and hence, not getting updated.
can anyone help me out with this?

Hi Pratima,
unfortunately i can only write that I am facing the same challenge at the moment. I will update the discussion as soon as I have a solution.
Best regards
Bjoern

Field KZWI4 is not getting updated in table EKPO

I have a case where for two scheduling agreements the pricing procedure getting determined is the same, but the field KZWI4 (subtotal 4) in table EKPO is getting updated for one SA and not for the other. The only difference in the two SAs are the tax codes. Do tax codes have any bearing on the field KZWI4 getting updated in table EKPO?
Regards,
Pratima.

Hi Pratima,
unfortunately i can only write that I am facing the same challenge at the moment. I will update the discussion as soon as I have a solution.
Best regards
Bjoern

Formula field, Detail records not getting updated

Hello seniors,
i need help on 2 issues;
first, Issue No. 1
i have master-detail form with the following tables;
POH                                  master record table
PH_NO                              pk
PH_PARTY
PH_FXRATE                       exchange rate
PH_PD_LOCAL_TOT           total of PD_LOCAL_AMT from details records
PH_PD_FOREIGN_TOT       total of PD_FOREIGN_AMT from details records
POD                      Detail records table
PD_PHNO              fk
PD_ITEM
PD_QTY
PD_PRICE
PD_LOCAL_AMT
PD_FOREIGN_AMT
M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT       Formula (PD_QTY * PD_PRICE)
M_PD_LOCAL_AMT           Formula (M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT/PH_FXRATE)
CTRL                 Control block
M_PH_PD_LOCAL_TOT           Summary-Sum-Table=POD, Field=M_PD_LOCAL_AMT
M_PH_PD_FOREIGN_TOT       Summary-Sum-Table=POD, Field=M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT
Triggers
POH Table
Pre-Insert   and   Pre-Update
:PH_PD_LOCAL_TOT := :M_PH_PD_LOCAL_TOT
:PH_PD_FOREIGN_TOT := :M_PH_PD_FOREIGN_TOT
POD Table
Pre-Insert   and   Pre-Update
:PD_LOCAL_AMT := :M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT
:PD_FOREIGN_AMT := :M_PD_LOCAL_AMTThe problem that i am facing is while i UPDATE a record.
whats happening is when the form is in Query mode and if i change a record, lets say
change the value of the field PH_FXRATE, then what happens is, on screen i get all Detail
record's M_PD_LOCAL_AMT Calculated & Updated, but the actual db field PD_LOCAL_AMT remains unchanged
in the database after i press F10 or Save button.
The update takes place for the POH table and form displays 1 Record updated.
whereas if i have for example 4 detail records, then form should update those as well and display finally
5 records updated is'nt it..?
In query mode,if i insert new or modify an existing record in the detail block, then at this point, form marks just
that particular record as CHANGED. Thus making changes at db level only for this particular record.
what i want is once i make changes to the field PH_FXRATE, then form should mark all detail records
as CHANGED and on saving, the PRE-UPDATE tigger of POD table should come in to force and the changes
in the values of M_PD_LOCAL_AMT in turn to the db field PD_LOCAL_AMT should get affected at db level.
i have also tried to put these assignments
:PD_LOCAL_AMT := :M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT
:PD_FOREIGN_AMT := :M_PD_LOCAL_AMT
at PRE-UPDATE of POH table, thinking that form might consider
all detail records, at this point. i noticed that it does it, but only picks
1 record (i guess just the first record always) and change a db level.
No. 2 Issue:
i have put a POST-FORM-COMMIT at form level for auditing the Total fields of POH table against the details records.
Declare
     M_LC_AMOUNT NUMBER(13,3);
              M_FC_AMOUNT NUMBER(13,3);
Begin
     SELECT SUM(PD_LOCAL_AMT) INTO M_LC_AMOUNT
     FROM POD
     WHERE PD_PHNO = :PD_PHNO;
     IF :PH_PD_LOCAL_TOT != M_LC_AMOUNT THEN
          :PH_PD_LOCAL_TOT := M_LC_AMOUNT;
     END IF;
     SELECT SUM(PD_LOCAL_AMT) INTO M_FC_AMOUNT
     FROM    POD
     WHERE PD_PHNO = :PD_PHNO;
     IF :PH_PD_FOREIGN_TOT != M_FC_AMOUNT THEN
          :PH_PD_FOREIGN_TOT := M_FC_AMOUNT;
     END IF;
End;i was testing and notice that in a query mode when all records are displayed.
if i go on changing values on records and save or save later keeping the form open,
form allows, but if 1 come back to a record which i may have changed and saved earlier, then it flashes Error;
"Records has been changed by another user, requery to ..."
i want to do an Audit before final db-Commit and keep the user free from this Error..
Please tell me first of all, is my approach for both of my issues,correct.?
if not, then please suggest what should be changed.
i'll highly appreciate for all your help. TYVM. Regards.

I did exactly as you suggested. It works well for new record insertion
but when i press F7 to query it, its flashes messages before displaying detail records
Field must be entered.
Mr. Andreas,
i have problem only when i change value of PH_FXRATE. It re-calculates on screen values for M_PD_LOCAL_AMT
(Formula M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT/PH_FXRATE)
i want the changed value of M_PD_LOCAL_AMT to be saved in the actual db-field PD_LOCAL_AMT.
for this i have PRE-UPDATE on POD Table
:PD_LOCAL_AMT := :M_PD_LOCAL_AMT
:PD_FOREIGN_AMT := :M_PD_FOREIGN_AMT
Which is doing that.It is not marking the detial record as CHANGED.
I tried giving the above assignments in the PRE-UPDATE on POH table.
It saves the changed value in the db-field, but not all detail records, if more than 1.
what you have suggested, will get me acheived what i am looking for..?

Using PC data targets not get updated...

Hai murali/friends...
now in my daily running process chain i have one error . i.e. in that if i use transaction rspcm the daily running chain is showing yellow colour...not showing in green colour and then i have displayed , display varient and then it shows one execute info package as yelloow colour i tried to right click on that and i displayed display messages and then it shows
"INFORMATION WAS STORED IN SOURCE SYSTEM"
to avoid this i mean i need to get data succefully updated but instead of this am getting above messages and my data targets also not updated succefully ...what will be the solution??? and in PSA data is available.....
help me friends.... last day onwards am trying to solve this issue but i can not......

thnak you very much sreekanth....
but while trying to load manually .. it is saying that already already data is there in delta... we cant not process this request...
like that am getting ... am totally ... confused sreekanth... in other messages am getting
There is a discrepancy between the confirmation and deletion of qRFC-LUWs
Message no. RSQU016
Diagnosis
When data was confirmed and deleted in the qRFC queue, the system found a discrepancy between the number of newly confirmed LUWs ( 2282) and the number of LUWs to be deleted ( 3424).
Where more LUWs are to be deleted than were previously confirmed, a previous delete attempt was terminated.
The LUWs were confirmed but not completely deleted from the qRFC and tRFC tables. The confirmation already ensures that the data is not transferred into the BW again with a subsequent request.
Delta extraction was continued.
Procedure
You do not need to do anything urgently.
If the message also arises during all subsequent delta requests, contact SAP Support with the message number at hand. In this case, there is a danger that the qRFC and tRFC tables run at full capacity, which may also affect other applications.

KINAK field in Table KONV not getting updated with value W

Hi,
I have a PO where I am deleting a line item.
After I delet line item the field KINAK in table KONV gets updated with value W.
But I am getting instance where in some cases the field KINAK is not getting updated.
The result is deleted line item is getting populated in PO output also.
Regards
Nandiini

KINAK is updated only when a Condition is inactive ! So when a item is deleted the condition becomes inactive and gets updated with 'W' which means statistical(not to be counted)
A     Condition exclusion item
K     Inactive due to calculation basis/shipping material type
L     Condition exclusion header or inactive at header level
M     Inactive due to manual entry
T     Inactive at header level
W     The document item is statistical
X     Inactive via formulae of incorrect
X     Inactive via formulae of incorrect
Y     Inactive because of subsequent price

How to change credit limit used % in fd32

Hi all,
Credit limit has been maintained to customer with max of 2,00,000 inr previously. Now Credit exporsure is 1,50,000 inr. credit limit used is 75%.
But we are going to set new credit limit to a particular customer with 1,00,000 inr.
We have changed credit limit to 1,00,000 in FD32. Now credit limit has been changed to 1,00,000.
But the problem is credit limit used percentage 150%. I want to reset the credit limit used to 0%.
How to make credit limit used from 150% to 0% without any FI adjustment? ( since this has to be done in production server)
Thanks in advance,
Babu

How is the Credit Exposure of Rs. 1,50,000 calculated?
Is it outstanding Invoices to be paid by the Customer? Then once the Customer pays the amount the % would come to 0.
Is it due to Open sales order or Open Deliveries or Open Invoices? Then once the entire cycle is completed then the % would come to zero.
Hope this helps..
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Open sales order not getting updated in FD32

HI
We are configuring Credit management, and found that the open sales orders are not getting updated in FD32.
I have checked all the settings in OVA8 and all are working fine. This is a Static credit check and system is blocking the customer in case, the limit is exceeded. But the values are not getting reflected in FD32, for open sale orders, that are not blocked.
Info structure S066 in OMO1 all are configured perfectly. I have run F.28 and no log was issued.
Request to suggest other reasons for not getting updated in the table.
I have gone thru the previous threads, but cud not find any solution.
Regards
Vamsi Javaji.

Hi Vamsi Javaji
First of all check in OVA8 wheather you have checked Open sales orders feild or not . Secondly check in your pricing procedure wheather you have maintained Subtotal A or not for the Net Value .Also check wheather you have assigned to your sales document type correctly or not Finally check in OMO1 wheather S066 has been assigned correctly or not
Check wheather you have assigned the Credit control area to the customer in CMR , in sales tab
Regards
Srinath

FD33 - Receivable Field in Customer master is not getting updated

FD33 - Receivable Field in Customer master is not getting updated for the FI documents posted in the customer account. I need to know is there any setting either in FI or in SD, which control whether the FI document is relevant to credit check?
In SD, we are having the item category but i am not getting how to control for FI documents? How can i make them credit relevant item. Also for special item, we are controlling the same through Transaction code : OBXY - by special GL indicators but what about the normal/general item?
How can I control the general FI documents having various FI documents type as relevant to credit check?

Apart from the above,please also check the below:
FD33 - Receivable Field in Customer master is not getting updated for the FI documents posted in the customer account. I need to know is there any setting either in FI or in SD, which control whether the FI document is relevant to credit check?
As per me there is no specific control to active the credit active field in FI values unlike for updating the sales values in FD32 we activate credit active for the item cat(VOV7) which will ensure the sales values to update (open order, open delivery and open invoices) in to credit management.
For FI values to update i think this is inbuilt in the program only.( example update group 000012,15,18 etc).
Any way coming into query not updating the receivables, please check the below points once again.
1. Check the whether invoice has accounting document generated or not, make sure that it is generated then only system update the receivables.
2. Even if the above all points are checked including above all posts,then also still the same issue repeating then try to run the program RVKRED77, before this first run RVKRED88 and compare this values with FD32.
thanks,
Srinu.

Open order value and credit limit used are -ve

Hi,
We are running into the problem where there is a negative open order value and orders are bypassing credit hold.
The values are incorrect in the open order value and in the credit limit used. These both show as negative values, which is bad.
We have made settings in OVA8 correctly. Is there any other setting should be made in order to block the open order value and credit limit used ????
Thanks in advance. Appreciate if it is replied immediately.
Sankar

Hello,
Please take the help of the SD consultant in this regard. Because open orders means there are many like invoiced and not yet delivered. And the credit limit is also part of the SD to check.
Please check in the T.code FD32 to find out the credit limit detials of the customer.
If helpful pls assign points.
Rams

Product ID is not getting updated in SC Goods /Service field

Hi Gurus,
While creating shopping carts in EBP, we are able to find the Product ID from the Good/Service find option, but when we select the Product ID in the search, it's not getting updated in the SC Goods/Service field.Also when we try to find the Cost center / WBS using find button it's not going to the search area after software upgrade.
Could you please suggest us why system is behaving like this.
Thanks
Sada

Hi Gurus,
Any Idea on this.
Also few of the Product ID's are getting updated from the search help to Goods /Service field of the SC and some are not getting updated. while debug the SC , we are geeting the error message as BBP_SC006, Its relavant to catlog. But we are not transfering the Product from catlog to SC item.
The error mesage as: Good/Service & does not exist.
Thanks & regards
Sada

Information in the case folder is not getting updated in Oracle Credit Mgt

Hi,
I have created an SO and an Invoice for this SO for a particular customer. Now, when I create a credit application and a case folder in OCM for this customer, Fields like Receivables Balance, Credit Exposure, Days Sales Outstanding etc. in the case folder are not getting updated. These fields are not getting updated even after refreshing the case folder. It means that the information from the 'Receivables Responsibility is not getting updated in the case folder.
I have already run the 'Initialize credit Summaries' concurrent program after creating the Sales Order and Invoice.
PS: The case folder gets updated only when I set the Profile Option: "AR: Allow summary table refresh" to Yes and then running the "Refresh AR Transactions Summary Tables" concurrent program. But once this program runs the Profile Option again becomes 'No' (Which is a Standard functionality).
So this is a manual way to update the case folder. My requirement is that the case folder should get updated automatically and no manual intervention should be required.

Sumit Malik wrote:
Hi,
I have created an SO and an Invoice for this SO for a particular customer. Now, when I create a credit application and a case folder in OCM for this customer, Fields like Receivables Balance, Credit Exposure, Days Sales Outstanding etc. in the case folder are not getting updated. These fields are not getting updated even after refreshing the case folder. It means that the information from the 'Receivables Responsibility is not getting updated in the case folder.
I have already run the 'Initialize credit Summaries' concurrent program after creating the Sales Order and Invoice.
PS: The case folder gets updated only when I set the Profile Option: "AR: Allow summary table refresh" to Yes and then running the "Refresh AR Transactions Summary Tables" concurrent program. But once this program runs the Profile Option again becomes 'No' (Which is a Standard functionality).
So this is a manual way to update the case folder. My requirement is that the case folder should get updated automatically and no manual intervention should be required.Duplicate post -- Information in the case folder is not getting updated in Oracle Credit Mgt

TDS amount not getting updated in the table under the field QBSHB

Dear Friends,
The TDS amount entered while booking the vendor invoices through MIRO T-cde, is not getting updated in the table BSEG under the field QBSHB.
Kindly let me know the reason for the same and guide me to correct it
TIA.
Regards,
Vincent

HI Vincent,
Bseg-QBSHB field is relavent for classic WT.
I hope you are using the EWT.
Hence if you post a document through MIRO it will not update
(but if you post document FB60 it will update but wrongly).
Reason is Miro document is posted through interface.
Hence SAP is suggested to not refer the Bseg-QBSHB and etc., fields.
refer only with_item table.
Please refer the below replay from SAP
Please refer the below note .363309
Please review attached note 363309 for detailed explanation
BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And
extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table
WITH_ITEM.
You can check in table BSEG for the fields and will find that system
do NOT update field BSEG-QBSHB.
In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actully the field
of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows
zero in line item display.
And as note 363309 says,
"Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information
from your display variant.
If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on
the document number and subsequently choose 'Withholding tax' button."
(BSEG-QSSKZ, BSEG-QSSHB, BSEG-QBSHB) field is not relavent for
Extended withholding tax and not suppose to use in report FBL1N.
It basically does not make any sense to use the withholding tax fields
of the document line items (BSEG-QSSKZ, BSEG-QSSHB, BSEG-QBSHB) with the
activated extended withholding tax.
regards
Madhu M
Edited by: M Madhu on Jan 31, 2011 1:19 PM

Field not getting updated in BDC while running in background

Hi Friends,
I'm executing a BDC transaction to update the Alternate Tax Classification (VBAK_TAXK1) field in Sales Order. I'm passing value 1 to the field and then saving it directly. While running the BDC in background, the field is not getting updated. On the other hand i checked it running in foreground, the field got updated without any error message.
Can anybody help me advicing why the field is not getting updated in background?
Thanks,
Bestin

Hi ,
Check the the log if you are using a session method and if call transaction then capture the messages for the same,
Because in the foreground the BDC will update the records even if there is a warning message nut in background it will not update. So check the data which you are inserting and try avoid the warning messages also so that it can run smoothly in backfround.
Thanks & Regards
Jyo

Cred.lim.used field in FD32 not getting updated

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for