Data block corrupted on standby database (logical corruption)

Question

Hi all,
we are getting the below error on our DRSITE,it is MANUAL PHYSCIAL STANDBY DATABSE...
The following error has occurred:
ORA-01578: ORACLE data block corrupted (file # 3, block # 3236947)
ORA-01110: data file 3: '/bkp/oradata/orcl_raw_cadata01'
ORA-26040: Data block was loaded using the NOLOGGING option
I have checked in the Primary database, that there are some object which are not being logged into the redo logfiles.....
SQL> select table_name,INDEX_NAME,logging from dba_indexes where logging='NO'
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME LOG
MENU_MENUS NUX_MENU_MENUS_01 NO
MENU_USER_MENUS MENU_USER_MENUS_X NO
OM_CITY IDM_OM_CITY_CITY_NAME NO
OM_EMPLOYER                    EMPLR_CODE_PK                  NO
OM_EMPLOYER                    IDM_EMPLR_EMPLR_NAME           NOOM_STUDENT_HEAD OM_STUDENT_HEAD_HEAD_UK01 NO
OT_DAK_ENTRY_DETL DED_SYS_ID_PK NO
OT_DAK_ENTRY_HEAD DEH_SYS_ID_PK NO
OT_DAK_ENTRY_HEAD IDM_DEH_DT_APPL_REGION NO
OT_DAK_ENTRY_HEAD IDM_DEH_REGION_CODE NO
OT_DAK_REFUNDS_DETL DRD_SYS_ID_PK NO
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME LOG
OT_MEM_FEE_COL_DETL IDM_MFCD_MFCH_SYS_ID NO
OM_STUDENT_HEAD IDM_STUD_COURSE NO
13 rows selected.
so the main problem is in the OM_EMPOYER tables if i would delete the indexes from that table recreate it again with the logging clause,and then apply the archvied logs to the DRSITE.WILL THE problem will resolve.
Pls suggest me...

Answer 1

Hi..
Firstly how did you confirm that it was that index only.Can you post the output of
SELECT tablespace_name, segment_type, owner, segment_name
FROM dba_extents WHERE file_id = 3 and 3236947 between block_id
AND block_id + blocks - 1;
This query can take time, if are sure that its the index don't fire this command .
Secondly, when you will drop and recreate the index, it will be logged into the redo logfile.This information will be be logged in to an the archivelog file as its the replica of the redo logfile. Then when you apply this archive log maually, it will drop that index and then recreate it using the same sql.
HTH
Anand